Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T19:35:42.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Misplaced ideas? Locating and dislocating Ireland in colonial and postcolonial studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Crystal Bartolovich
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, New York
Neil Lazarus
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Get access

Summary

The emergence of colonial and postcolonial studies within the Irish academy as a distinct mode of critical analysis can be dated to the start of the 1980s. In retrospect, the Field Day Theatre Company's staging of Brian Friel's Translations in 1980 seems a formative moment: the play dealt with the state-sponsored mapping and the Anglicization of the nineteenth-century Irish landscape, provoking questions about the relationship between knowledge, language, and power that would soon be taken up in Irish postcolonial studies also. Later in the decade, the small but growing body of work that shared this colonialistinterest received considerable stimulus when Field Day commissioned pamphlets by Edward Said (1990), Fredric Jameson (1990b) and Terry Eagleton (1990) which examined modern Irish culture within the context of colonialism, imperialism, and anticolonial nationalism. At the same time, David Cairns and Shaun Richards published their seminal Writing Ireland: Colonialism, Nationalism, and Culture (1988) – the first extended historical survey of Irish literature to draw explicitly on the wider international body of postcolonial criticism inspired by Said's Orientalism. The topic's increasing significance in Irish cultural studies was indicated at the start of the 1990s when essays by Luke Gibbons (1991), David Lloyd (1991) and Clair Wills (1991) appeared in a special issue of The Oxford Literary Review devoted to the subject of colonialism. Since then a substantial body of criticism by some of Ireland's most distinguished cultural critics has appeared, drawing extensively on the theoretical resources of postcolonial studies (e.g., Boylan and Foley 1992; Lloyd 1993, 1999; Kiberd 1995; Deane 1997; Bourke 1999).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×