Adorno, Theodor W.; Frenkel-Brunswick, Else; Levinson, Daniel J.; and Sanford, Newitt. 1950. The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Agalianos, Angelos; Whitty, Geoff; and Noss, Richard. 2006. “The Social Shaping of Logo,” Social Studies of Science 16, 2: 241–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akrich, Madeleine. 1992. “The De-Scription of Technical Objects,” in Bijker, Wiebe E., and Law, John (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 205–224.Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis. 1971. “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses: Notes Towards an Investigation,” in Althusser, Louis, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. London: NLB, pp. 123–173.Google Scholar

Amit, Vered (ed.). 2000. Constructing the Field: Ethnographic Fieldwork in the Contemporary World. New York: Routledge.CrossRef

Asplund, Johan. 1985. Tid, rum, individ och kollektiv [Time, Space, Individual and Collective]. Stockholm: Liber Förlag.Google Scholar

Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barab, Sasha, and Plucker, Jonathan A. 2002. “Smart People or Smart Contexts? Cognition, Ability, and Talent Development in an Age of Situated Approaches to Knowing and Learning,” Educational Psychologist 37, 3: 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barab, Sasha; Sadler, Troy D.; Heiselt, Conan; Hickey, Daniel; and Zuiker, Steven. 2006. “Relating Narrative, Inquiry, and Inscriptions: Supporting Consequential Play,” Journal of Science Education and Technology 16, 1: 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barad, Karen. 1998. “Getting Real: Technoscientific Practices and the Materialization of Reality,” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 10, 2: 87–128.Google Scholar

Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, Andrew. 2001. Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar

Bingham, Nick, and Thrift, Nigel. 2000. “Some New Instructions for Travellers: The Geography of Bruno Latour and Michel Serres,” in Crang, Mike, and Thrift, Nigel (eds.) Thinking Space. London: Routledge, pp. 281–301.Google Scholar

Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Boyd, Sally. 2002. Literature Review for the Evaluation of the Digital Opportunities Projects. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar

Brewster, Maria. 2001. Supermanual: The Incomplete Guide to the Superchannel. Liverpool: Foundation for Art and Creative Technology.Google Scholar

Brown, Steven D., and Capdevilla, Rose. 1999. “Perpetuum Mobile: Substance, Force and the Sociology of Translation,” in Law, John, and Hassard, John (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 26–50.Google Scholar

Buckingham, David. 2000. After the Death of Childhood: Growing Up in the Age of Electronic Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies that Matter – on the Discursive Limits of “Sex.”New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Butler, Judith. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories of Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Callon, Michel. 1986. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen at St. Brieuc Bay,” in Law, John (ed.) Power, Action and Belief. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul, pp. 196–233.Google Scholar

Callon, Michel. 1998. The Laws of the Markets. London: Blackwell Publishers/Sociological Review.Google Scholar

Callon, Michel, and Law, John. 1997. “After the Individual in Society: Lessons on Collectivity from Science, Technology and Society,” Canadian Journal of Sociology 22: 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casey, Edward S. 1998. The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History. Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar

Christensen, Pia H., and James, Allison. 2000. Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Clarke, Adele E. 2005. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn. Thousand Oaks, CA, London, and New Dehli: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, Michael. 1996. Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Colley, Helen; Hodkinson, Paul; and Malcom, Janice. 2002. Non-Formal Learning: Mapping the Conceptual Terrain: A Consultation Report. Leeds: University of Leeds Lifelong Learning Institute.Google Scholar

Coninck-Smith, Ning, and Gutman, Marta. 2004. “Children and Youth in Public,” Childhood 11, 2: 131–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crang, Mike, and Thrift, Nigel. (eds.) 2000. Thinking Space. London: Routledge.

Cuban, Larry. 1986. Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1995. Negotiations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Despret, Vinciane. 2004a. Our Emotional Makeup. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar

Despret, Vinciane. 2004b. “The Body We Care For: Figures of Anthropo-Zoo-Genesis,” Body and Society [Special Issue on Bodies on Trial] 10, 2–3: 111–134.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. 1929. The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. 1938. Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Dillenbourg, Pierre. 2000. “Virtual Learning Environments.” Paper presented at the EUN Conference 2000, Geneva.

Dreier, Ole. 1993. Psykosocial Behandling – En teori om et praksisområde [Psycho-Social Treatment – A Theory of a Field of Practice]. Copenhagen: Dansk psykologisk Forlag.Google Scholar

Dreier, Ole. 1999. “Personal Trajectories of Participation across Contexts of Social Practice,” Outlines – Critical Social Studies 1: 5–32.Google Scholar

Dreier, Ole. 2003. “Learning in Personal Trajectories of Participation,” in Stephenson, Niamh; Radtke, H. Lorraine; Jorna, Rene; and Stam, Henderikus J. (eds.) Theoretical Psychology: Critical Contributions. Concord: Captus University Publications, pp. 20–29.Google Scholar

Dreier, Ole. 2008. Psychotherapy in Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Druin, Allison, and Solomon, Cynthia. 1996. Designing Multimedia Environments for Children: Computers, Creativity, and Kids. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Ejlskov, Morten W.; Jensen, Kenneth H.; Jensen, Tine; and Sørensen, Estrid. 2001. “Situmanual – Incomplete Guide to the Superchannel,” in ,FACT (ed.) Situmanual – Incomplete Guide to the Superchannel. Liverpool: FACT, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar

Elgaard Jensen, Torben. 2001. Performing Social Work – Competence, Orderings, Spaces and Objects. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Elgaard Jensen, Torben. 2007. “Witnessing the Future,” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 8, 1: Art. 1.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archeology of Knowledge. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 1994. The Interpretations of Dreams. New York: Modern Library Edition.Google Scholar

Gane, Nicholas, and Haraway, Donna. 2006. “When We Have Never Been Human, What Is to Be Done? Interview with Donna Haraway,” Theory, Culture & Society 23, 7–8: 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garfinkle, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Glasersfeld, Ernst. 1985. “Reconstructing the Concept of Knowledge,” Archives de Psychologie 53: 91–101.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Gomart, Emile. 2004. “Surprised by Methadone: In Praise of Drug Substitution Treatment in a French Clinic,” Body and Society [Special Issue on Bodies on Trial] 10, 2–3: 85–110.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Charles. 1994. “Professional Vision,” American Anthropologist 96, 3: 606–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Griffin, Peg, and Cole, Michael. 1984. “Current Activity for the Future: The Zoped,” in Rogoff, Barbara, and Wertsch, James (eds.) Children's Learning in the “Zone of Proximal Development.”San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 45–64.Google Scholar

Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 2004. Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Hammersley, Martyn, and Atkinson, Paul. 1995. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 1991. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century,” in Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, pp. 149–182.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. Femaleman©_Meets_OncoMouse™. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna J. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Hastrup, Kirsten, and Ovesen, Jan. 1985. Etnografisk grundbog: Metoder, teorier, resultater [Ethnographic primer: Methods, Theories, Results]. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar

Hatch, Thomas, and Gardner, Howard. 1993. “Finding Cognition in the Classroom: An Expanded View of Human Intelligence,” in Salomon, Gavriel (ed.) Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–187.Google Scholar

Henriksen, Dixi Louise. 2003. ProjectWeb as Practice: On the Relevance of Radical Localism for Information Systems Development Research. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetscenter.Google Scholar

Hetherington, John, and Lee, Nick. 2000. “Social Order and the Blank Figure,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18, 2: 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hewitt, Jim. 2001. “From a Focus on Tasks to a Focus on Understanding: The Cultural Transformation of a Toronto Classroom,” in Koschmann, Timothy; Hall, Rogers P.; and Miyake, Naomi (eds.) CSCL 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation. Mahwah and London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 11–42.Google Scholar

Hine, Christine. 2000. Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hine, Christine (ed.). 2005. Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg.

Hirschauer, Stefan. 2004. “Praktiken und ihre Körper: Über materielle Partizipanden des Tuns” [Concerning Material Participants of Doing], in Hörning, Karl H., and Reuther, Julia (eds.) Doing Culture: Neue Positionen zum Verhältnis von Kultur und sozialer Praxis. Bielefeld: Transcript, pp. 73–91.Google Scholar

Højrup, Thomas. 2003. State, Culture and Life-Modes: The Foundations of Life-Mode Analysis. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Holzkamp, Klaus. 1995. Lernen: Subjektwissenschaftliche Grundlegung [Learning: A Subjectivity Research Foundation]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar

Hoppe, Ulrich H. 2007. “Educational Information Technologies and Collaborative Learning,” in Hoppe, Ulrich H.; Ogata, Hiroaki; and Soller, Amy (eds.) The Role of Technology in CSCL: Studies in Technology Enhanced Collaborative Learning. New York: Springer, pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson-Smith, Andy. 2001. “30 Days in ActiveWorlds: Community, Design and Terrorism in a Virtual World,” in Schroeder, Ralph (ed.) The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, pp. 77–89.Google Scholar

Hughes, Thomas P. 1989. “The Evolution of Large Technological Systems,” in Bijker, Wiebe E.; Hughes, Thomas P.; and Pinch, Trevor J. (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 51–82.Google Scholar

Hultqvist, Kenneth. 2001. “Bringing the Gods and the Angels Back? A Modern Pedagogical Saga about Excess in Moderation,” Hultqvist, Kenneth, and Dahlberg, Gunilla (eds.) Governing the Child in the New Millennium. New York: Routledge Falmer, pp. 143–171.Google Scholar

Hultqvist, Kenneth. 2004. “The Traveling State, the Nation and the Subject of Education,” in Baker, Bernadette M., and Heyning, Katharina E. (eds.) Dangerous Coagulations? The Uses of Foucault in the Study of Education. New York: Peter Lang: pp. 153–188.Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila. 2007. “Making Order: Law and Science in Action,” in Hackett, Edward J.; Amsterdamska, Olga; Lynch, Michael; and Wajcman, Judy (eds.) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 761–786.Google Scholar

Jensen, Casper, and Lauritsen, Peter. 2005. “Qualitative Research as Partial Connection: Bypassing the Power-Knowledge Nexus,” Qualitative Research 5, 1: 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jensen, Tine. 2005a. Thinking about Competence and Subjectivity in the Fifth Dimension: Working on the Boundaries of Virtuality and Subjectivity in and out of School. Roskilde: Roskilde University.Google Scholar

Jensen, Tine. 2005b. “When Faith and Good Will Is Not Enough: Researcher Positions in Interactive Research with School Children,” Annual Review of Critical Psychology 4, 4: 166–178.Google Scholar

Jensen, Tine; Jensen, Kenneth; and Morten, Jack. 2005. “Learning in Virtual and Physical Communities,” in Nocon, Honorine, and Nilsson, Monica (eds.) School of Tomorrow: Teaching and Technology in Local and Global Communities. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 87–130.Google Scholar

Johnson, Jim (aka Bruno Latour). 1995. “Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer,” in Star, Susan Leigh (ed.) Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 257–277.Google Scholar

Karsten, Lia. 2003. “Children's Use of Public Space: The Gendered World of the Playground,” Childhood 10, 4: 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaspersen, Lars Bo. 1995. Anthony Giddens – introduktion til en samfundsteoretiker [Anthony Giddens – Introduction to a Social Theorist]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar

Klette, Kirsti. 1998. “Introduksjon til klasseromsforskning som forskningsfelt” [Introduction to Classroom Research as a Research Field], in Klette, Kirsti (ed.) Klasseromsforskning – på norsk. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal, pp. 13–35.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Knorr Cetina, Karin, and Preda, Alex. 2004. The Sociology of Financial Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Koschmann, Timothy. 1996. CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Koschmann, Timothy;Hall, Rogers P.; and Miyake, Naomi (eds.). 2002. CSCL 2: Carrying Forward the Conversation. Mahwah and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Laet, Marianne, and Mol, Annemarie. 2000. “The Zimbabwe Bush Pump: Mechanics of a Fluid Technology,” Social Studies of Science 30, 2: 225–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1988. The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1990. “Drawing Things Together,” in Lynch, Michael, and Woolgar, Steve (eds.) Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 19–68.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1999a. “A Collective of Humans and Nonhumans,” in Pandora's Hope – Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 174–215.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1999b. “Circulating References – Sampling the Soil in the Amazon Forest,” in Pandora's Hope – Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 24–79.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1999c. “Do You Believe in Reality” in Pandora's Hope – Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1999d. “On Recalling ANT,” in Law, John, and Hassard, John (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 15–25.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2004a. “How to Talk About the Body? The Normative Dimensions of Science Studies,” Body and Society [Special Issue on Bodies on Trial] 10, 2–3: 205–229.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2004b. “Scientific Objects and Legal Objectivity,” in Pottage, Alain, and Mundy, Martha (eds.) Law, Anthropology and the Constitution of the Social: Making Persons and Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–113.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2004c. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern,” Critical Inquiry 30: 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lave, Jean. 1988. Cognition in Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lave, Jean, and Wenger, Etienne. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, John. 1989. “Technology and Heterogeneous Engineering: The Case of Portuguese Expansion,” in Bijker, Wiebe E.; Hughes, Thomas P.; and Pinch, Trevor P. (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 111–134.Google Scholar

Law, John. 1999. “After ANT: Complexity, Naming and Topology,” in Law, John, and Hassard, John (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

Law, John. 2002a. Aircraft Stories – Decentering the Object in Technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, John. 2002b. “Objects and Spaces,” Theory, Culture and Society 19, 5/6: 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, John. 2004. After Methods – Mess in Social Science Research. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Law, John, and Hassard, John (eds.). 1999. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell.

Law, John, and Mol, Annemarie. 2001. “Situating Technoscience: An Inquiry into Spatiality,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19: 609–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, John, and Singleton, Vicky. 2005. “Object Lessons,” Organization 12, 3: 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leander, Kevin M. 2002. “Silencing in Classroom Interaction: Producing and Relating Social Spaces,” Discourse Processes 34, 2: 193–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Nick. 2001. Childhood and Society: Growing Up in an Age of Uncertainty. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Nick, and Brown, Steven D. 1994. “Otherness and the Actor Network – The Undiscovered Continent,” The American Behavioral Scientist 37, 6: 772–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lehtinen, Erno; Lipponen, Lasse; Hakkarainen, Kai; Rahikainen, Marjaana; and Muukkonen, Hanni. 2000. “Computer Supported Collaborative Learning: A Review,” in Jong, Frank; Simons, Robert-Jan; and Meijden, Henry (eds.) Computer Supported Collaborative Learning in Primary and Secondary Education: A Final Report for the European Commission. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar

Leontiev, Alexei Nikolajewitsch. 1978. Activity, Consciousness and Personality. New York and Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Ligorio, Maria Beatrice, and Veen, Klaas. 2006. “Constructing a Successful Cross-National Virtual Learning Environment in Primary and Secondary Education,” Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education Journal 14, 2: 103–128.Google Scholar

Lindblad, Sverker, and Sahlström, Fritjof. 1998. “Klasserumsforskning: En oversigt med fokus på interaktion og elever” [Classroom Research: An Overview with Focus on Interaction and Pupils], in Bjerg, Jens (ed.) Pædagogik – en grundbog til et fag. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag A/S, pp. 224–257.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas. 2002. Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft [The Educational System of Society]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar

Lyotard, Jean François. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Magnus, P. D. 2007. “Distributed Cognition and the Task of Science,” Social Studies of Science 37, 2: 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marland, Michael. 1993. The Craft of the Classroom: A Survival Guide. Oxford: Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar

McCormick, Robert M., and Paechter, Carrie. 1999. Learning and Knowledge. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Mead, George Herbert. 1932. “The Objective Reality of Perspectives,” in The Philosophy of the Present. Chicago: Chicago University Press: pp. 161–175.Google Scholar

Mead, George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Medd, Will, and Marvin, Simon. 2007. “Making Water Work: Intermediating between Regional Strategy and Local Practice,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space (Advance Online Publication), http://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=d3205.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Merton, Robert K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, Daniel, and Slater, Don. 2000. The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar

Mol, Annemarie. 1999. “Ontological Politics: A Word and Some Questions,” in Law, John, and Hassard, John (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 74–89.Google Scholar

Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mol, Annemarie, and Law, John. 1994. “Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology,” Social Studies of Science 24: 641–671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mørk, Sven. 1994. “Handlingsteorien” [The Action Theory], Udkast – Dansk tidskrift for Kritisk Samfundsvidenskab 22, 1: 3–47.Google Scholar

Newman, Fred, and Holzman, Lois. 1997. The End of Knowing: A New Developmental Way of Learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Klaus, and Kvale, Steinar. 1999. Mesterlære: Læring som Social Praksis [Apprenticeship: Learning as Social Practice]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar

Nocon, Honorine. 2005. “The Role of Network in the School of Tomorrow,” in Nocon, Honorine, and Nilsson, Monica (eds.) School of Tomorrow: Teaching and Technology in Local and Global Communities. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 131–166.Google Scholar

O'Day, Vicky; Bobrow, Daniel; Bobrow, Kimberly; Shirley, Mark; Hughes, Billie; and Walters, Jim. 1998. “Moving Practice: From Classrooms to MOO Rooms,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 7, 1–2: pp. 9–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,OECD. 2004. Learning for Tomorrow's World: First Results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Papert, Seymour. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Papert, Seymour. 1993. The Children's Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of the Computer. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Philo, Chris. 2000. “Foucault's Geography,” in Crang, Mike, and Thrift, Nigel (eds.) Thinking Space. London: Routledge, pp. 205–238.Google Scholar

Piaget, Jean. 1972. “The Myth of the Sensory Origin of Scientific Knowledge,” in Pickering, Andrew (ed.) Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a Theory of Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 45–62.Google Scholar

Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency & Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, Karl. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Quinn, Naomi. 1991. “The Culture Basis of Metaphor,” in Fernandez, James W. (ed.) Beyond Metaphor: The Theory of Trope in Anthropology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 56–93.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, Kim. 2004. “Places for Children – Children's Places,” Childhood 11, 2: 155–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rasmussen, Lise Bagge. 2006. Vejledning om disciplin, god adfærd og trivsel i folkeskolen – et inspirationshæfte [Guidance in Discipline, Good Behavior and Well-Being in Elementary School – an Inspiration Booklet]. Copenhagen: Undervisningsministerietsafdeling for grundskolen og folkeoplysning.Google Scholar

Rogoff, Barbara, and Wertsch, James. 1984. Children's Learning in the “Zone of Proximal Development.”San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Roth, Wolff-Michael. 1999. “Authentic School Science: Intellectual Traditions,” in McCormick, Robert M., and Paechter, Carrie (eds.) Learning and Knowledge. London: Open University Press, pp. 6–20.Google Scholar

Sabini, John. 1992. Social Psychology. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Salomon, Gavriel. 1993. Distributed Cognition – Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scheffer, Thomas. 2003. “The Duality of Mobilisation: Following the Rise and Fall of an Alibi-Story on Its Way to Court,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 33, 3: 313–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheffler, Israel. 1999. “Epistemology and Education,” in McCormick, Robert M., and Paechter, Carrie (eds.) Learning and Knowledge. London: Open University Press, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Ralph; Huxor, Avon; and Smith, Andy. 2001. “Activeworlds: Geography and Social Interaction in Virtual Reality,” Futures 33: 569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapin, Steven, and Schaffer, Steven. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Shutkin, David. 1998. “The Deployment of Information Technology in the Field of Education and the Augmentation of the Child,” in Popkewitz, Thomas S., and Brennan, Marie (eds.) Foucault's Challenge: Discourse, Knowledge, and Power in Education. New York: Teachers College Press: pp. 205–230.Google Scholar

Simpson, Brenda. 2000. “The Body as a Site of Contestation in School,” in Prout, Alan (ed.) The Body, Childhood and Society. London: Macmillian Press, pp. 60–78.Google Scholar

Sismondo, Sergio. 2004. An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Smith, Richard G. 2003. “Baudrillard's Nonrepresentational Theory: Burn the Signs and Journey without Maps,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21: 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sørensen, Estrid. 1998. “Computerspil – virkelighed eller fiktion?” [Computer Game – Reality or Fiction?], Nordisk Psykologi 50, 2: 135–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sørensen, Estrid. 2001. “Constituting Notions of Knowledge with Philosophy and Technology,” Outlines – Critical Social Studies 29, 1: 67–86.Google Scholar

Sørensen, Estrid. 2003. “From Research Result to Technological Development,” EU-report for Fifth Frame Program project “5D, Local Learning in a Global World.”

Sørensen, Estrid. 2005. “Lær af computerspil!” [Learn from Computer Games!], in Walther, Bo Kampmann, and Jessen, Carsten (eds.) Spillets verden. København: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitets Forlag, pp. 283–295.Google Scholar

Sørensen, Estrid. 2007. “The Time of Materiality,” Forum Qualitative Social Research 8, 1: Art. 2.Google Scholar

Spradley, James P. 1979. The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

St. Pierre, Elizabeth Adams. 1997. “Methodology in the Fold and the Irruption of Transgressive Data,” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 10, 2: 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Star, Susan Leigh. 1991. “Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On Being Allergic to Onions,” in Law, John (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 26–56.Google Scholar

Star, Susan Leigh. 2002. “Infrastructure and Ethnographic Practice: Working on the Fringes,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems [Special Issue on Ethnography and Intervention] 14, 2: 107–123.Google Scholar

Star, Susan Leigh, and Strauss, Anselm. 1999. “Layers of Silence, Arenas of Voice: The Ecology of Visible and Invisible Work,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 8: 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, Barbara. 2003. Superflex/Tools. Köln: Verlag der Buchhandling Walther König.Google Scholar

Stengers, Isabelle. 1997. Power and Invention: Situating Science. London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Stengers, Isabelle. 2000. The Invention of Modern Science. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Strathern, Marilyn. 1996. “Cutting the Network,” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2: 517–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suchman, Lucy. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy. 1999. “Working Relations of Technology Production and Use,” in MacKenzie, Donald, and Wajcman, Judz (eds.) The Social Shaping of Technology. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press, pp. 258–268.Google Scholar

Suchman, Lucy. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd Edition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Charles. 1985. Philosophy and the Human Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thrift, Nigel. 1996. Spatial Formations. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Thrift, Nigel. 2000. “Afterwords,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18: 213–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Traweek, Sharon. 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Turkle, Sherry. 1997. Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar

Turnbull, David. 1993. Maps Are Territories: Science Is an Atlas. Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar

,Uni-C. 2007. Computere i Skolen [Computers in School]. Retrieved December 6, 2007, from http://cis.emi.dk.

,U.S. Census Bureau. 2007. Administrative and Customer Services Division, Statistical Compendia Branch, Table 248. Retrieved December 6, 2007, from http://www.census.gov.

Varenne, Hervé, and McDermott, Ray. 1998. “Introduction,” in Varenne, Hervé, and McDermott, Ray (eds.) Successful Failure. Oxford: Westview Press, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Verran, Helen. 1998. “Re-Imagining Land Ownership in Australia,” Postcolonial Studies 1, 2: 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Verran, Helen. 1999. “Staying True to Laughter in Nigerian Classrooms,” in Law, John, and Hassard, John (eds.) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 136–155.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society – The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Warschauer, Mark. 1998. “Online Learning in Sociocultural Context,” Anthropology & Education Quarterly 29, 1: 68–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,Webster's New World Dictionary, and ,Thesaurus (Version 1.0). 1997. Accent Software International/Macmillan Publishers.

Winthereik, Brit Ross; Bont, Antoniette; and Berg, Marc. 2002. “Accessing the World of Doctors and Their Computers: ‘Making Available’ Objects of Study and the Research Site through Ethnographic Engagement,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems [Special Issue on Ethnography and Intervention] 14, 2: 47–58.Google Scholar

Winthereik, Brit Ross, and Vikkelsø, Signe. 2005. “ICT and Integrated Care: Some Dilemmas of Standardising Inter-Organisational Communication,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 14, 1: 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar