Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-7sgmh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T14:33:18.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Clinical applications of the Concealed Information Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
John J. B. Allen
Edited by
Bruno Verschuere ,
Gershon Ben-Shakhar  and
Ewout Meijer
John J. B. Allen
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Bruno Verschuere
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Gershon Ben-Shakhar
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ewout Meijer
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Overview: The Concealed Information Test (CIT) can prove useful in assessing clinical populations where individuals are unable or unwilling to report on their mnemonic experience. Unlike the traditional use of the CIT, where one assumes that individuals are willfully deceiving or concealing information, in clinical settings the CIT is employed to probe whether traces of memory may be present without necessarily assuming deception on the part of the examinee. A small clinical literature has utilized both autonomic and central psychophysiological measures in the CIT paradigm to assess such conditions as prosopagnosia and Dissociative Identity Disorder, and also to assess the possibility of malingering in memory assessment contexts. To date, the key unresolved issue for clinical assessment is whether evidence of recognition with the CIT reflects explicit vs. implicit memory.

Clinical applications of the Concealed Information Test

The Concealed Information Test (CIT) has not been widely used in clinical populations or clinical applications, but illustrative studies suggest that it may provide a useful method for assessing clinical conditions where individuals are unable or unwilling to report on their mnemonic experience. Applications may include a fairly typical implementation of the CIT when assessing memory in cases of claimed amnesia where there is reason to suspect malingering, but they may also involve assessing populations where there is no reason to suspect individuals are willfully misrepresenting their experience.

Type
Chapter
Information
Memory Detection
Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test
 , pp. 231 - 252
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aldridge-Morris, R. (1989). Multiple Personality: An Exercise in Deception. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Allen, J. J. B. (2002). The role of psychophysiology in clinical assessment: ERPs in the evaluation of memory. Psychophysiology, 39, 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. J. B., and Iacono, W. G. (1997). A comparison of methods for the analysis of event-related potentials in deception detection. Psychophysiology, 34, 234–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, J. J. B., and Iacono, W. G. (2001). Assessing the validity of amnesia in Dissociative Identity Disorder: a dilemma for the DSM and the courts. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 311–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. J. B., and Movius, H. L. (2000). The objective assessment of amnesia in dissociative identity disorder using event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 38, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, J. J. B., and Mertens, R. (2009). Limitations to the detection of deception: true and false recollections are poorly distinguished using an event-related potential procedure. Soc Neurosci, 4, 473–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, J. J. B., Iacono, W. G., and Danielson, K. D. (1992). The identification of concealed memories using the event-related potential and implicit behavioral measures: a methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences. Psychophysiology, 29, 504–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn., Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
Bauer, R. M. (1984). Autonomic recognition of names and faces in prosopagnosia: a neuropsychological application of the Guilty Knowledge Test. Neuropsychologia, 22, 457–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauer, R. M., and Verfaellie, M. (1988). Electrodermal discrimination of familiar but not unfamiliar faces in prosopagnosia. Brain & Cognition, 8, 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., and Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293–1295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., and Hoesen, G. W. (1982). Prosopagnosia: anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms. Neurology, 32, 331–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dick-Barnes, M., Nelson, R. O., and Aine, C. J. (1987). Behavioral measures of multiple personality: the case of Margaret. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 18, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eich, E., Macaulay, D., Loewenstein, R. J., and Dihle, P. H. (1997). Memory, amnesia, and dissociative identity disorder. Psychological Science, 8, 417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellwanger, J., Rosenfeld, J. P., Sweet, J. J., and Bhatt, M. (1996). Detecting simulated amnesia for autobiographical and recently learned information using the P300 event-related potential. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 23, 9–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elzinga, B. M., Phaf, R. H., Ardon, A. M., and Dyck, R. (2003). Directed forgetting between, but not within, dissociative personality states. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahy, T. A. (1988). The diagnosis of multiple personality disorder: a critical review. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, D., and Johnson, R. (2000). Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: a selective review. Microscopy Research and Technique, 51, 6–28.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graf, P., Squire, L. R., and Mandler, G. (1984). The information that amnesic patients do not forget. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 164–178.Google Scholar
Grueter, M., Grueter, T., Bell, V., Horst, J., Laskowski, W., Sperling, K., Halligan, P. W., Ellis, H. D., and Kennerknecht, I. (2007). Hereditary prosopagnosia: the first case series. Cortex, 43, 734–749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermans, E. J., Nijenhuis, E. R., Honk, J., Huntjens, R. J., and Hart, O. (2006). Identity state-dependent attentional bias for facial threat in dissociative identity disorder. Psychiatry Research, 141, 233–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntjens, R. J., Peters, M. L., Woertman, L., Hart, O., and Postma, A. (2007). Memory transfer for emotionally valenced words between identities in dissociative identity disorder. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 45, 775–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntjens, R. J., Peters, M. L., Postma, A., Woertman, L., Effting, M., and Hart, O. (2005). Transfer of newly acquired stimulus valence between identities in dissociative identity disorder (DID). Behaviour Research & Therapy, 43, 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntjens, R. J., Peters, M. L., Woertman, L., Bovenschen, L. M., Martin, R. C., and Postma, A. (2006). Inter-identity amnesia in dissociative identity disorder: a simulated memory impairment?Psychological Medicine, 36, 857–863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntjens, R. J., Postma, A., Hamaker, E. L., Woertman, L., Hart, O., and Peters, M. (2002). Perceptual and conceptual priming in patients with dissociative identity disorder. Memory and Cognition, 30, 1033–1043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, R. (1986). A triarchic model of P300 amplitude. Psychophysiology, 23, 367–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennerknecht, I., Ho, N. Y., and Wong, V. C. (2008). Prevalence of hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA) in Hong Kong Chinese population. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 146A, 2863–2870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennerknecht, I., Plumpe, N., Edwards, S., and Raman, R. (2007). Hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA): the first report outside the Caucasian population. Journal of Human Genetics, 52, 230–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennerknecht, I., Grueter, T., Welling, B., Wentzek, S., Horst, J., Edwards, S., and Grueter, M. (2006). First report of prevalence of non-syndromic hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA). American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 140, 1617–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindt, M., and Hout, M. (2003). Dissociation and memory fragmentation: experimental effects on meta-memory but not on actual memory performance. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 41, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, L. L., Allen, J. J., and Glisky, E. L. (2008). Interidentity memory transfer in dissociative identity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 686–692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ludwig, A. M., Brandsma, J. M., Wilbur, C. B., Bendfeldt, F., and Jameson, D. H. (1972). The objective study of a multiple personality. Or, are four heads better than one?Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 298–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 43, 385–388.Google Scholar
Merckelbach, H., Devilly, G. J., and Rassin, E. (2002). Alters in dissociative identity disorder. Metaphors or genuine entities?Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 481–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merskey, H. (1992). The manufacture of personalities: the production of multiple personality disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merskey, H. (1995). Multiple personality disorder and false memory syndrome. British Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 281–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mertens, R., and Allen, J. J. (2008). The role of psychophysiology in forensic assessments: deception detection, ERPs, and virtual reality mock crime scenarios. Psychophysiology, 45, 286–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcombe, N., and Fox, N. A. (1994). Infantile amnesia: through a glass darkly. Child Development, 65, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nissen, M. J., Ross, J. L., Willingham, D. B., Mackenzie, T. B., and Schacter, D. L. (1988). Memory and awareness in a patient with multiple personality disorder. Brain & Cognition, 8, 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paller, K. A., Voss, J. L., and Boehm, S. G. (2007). Validating neural correlates of familiarity. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, M. L., Uyterlinde, S. A., Consemulder, J., and Hart, O. (1998). Apparent amnesia on experimental memory tests in dissociative identity disorder: an exploratory study. Consciousness & Cognition: an International Journal, 7, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, A. (1994). Multiple personality disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 600–612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, G. E., Gudjonsson, G. H., and Mullen, P. (1983). Application of the Guilty-Knowledge Technique in a case of Pseudologia Fantastica. Personality & Individual Differences, 4, 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H. L., and McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 803–814.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. P. (2002). Event-related potentials in the detection of deception, malingering, and false memories. In Kleiner, M. (ed.), Handbook of Polygraph Testing (pp. 265–286). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. P., Ellwanger, J., and Sweet, J. (1995). Detecting simulated amnesia with event-related brain potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 19, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenfeld, J. P., Sweet, J. J., Chuang, J., Ellwanger, J., and Song, L. (1996). Detection of simulated malingering using forced choice recognition enhanced with event-related potential recording. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 10, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. P., Reinhart, A. M., Bhatt, M., Ellwanger, J., Gora, K., Sekera, M., and Sweet, J. (1998). P300 correlates of simulated malingered amnesia in a matching-to-sample task: topographic analyses of deception versus truthtelling responses. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 28, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rugg, M. D., and Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 251–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnyer, D. M., Allen, J. J. B., and Forster, K. I. (1997). Event-related brain potential examination of implicit memory processes: masked and unmasked repetition priming. Neuropsychology, 11, 243–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnyer, D. M., Allen, J. J. B., Kaszniak, A. W., and Forster, K. I. (1999). An event-related potential examination of masked and unmasked repetition priming in Alzheimer's disease: implications for theories of implicit memory. Neuropsychology, 13, 323–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silberman, E. K., Putnam, F. W., Weingartner, H., Braun, B. G., and Post, R. M. (1985). Dissociative states in multiple personality disorder: a quantitative study. Psychiatry Research, 15, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soares, J. J., and Ohman, A. (1993). Backward masking and skin conductance responses after conditioning to nonfeared but fear-relevant stimuli in fearful subjects. Psychophysiology, 30, 460–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spanos, N. P. (1994). Multiple identity enactments and multiple personality disorder: a sociocognitive perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 143–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spanos, N. P. (1996). Multiple Identities & False Memories: A Sociocognitive Perspective. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanos, N. P., Weekes, J. R., and Bertrand, L. D. (1985). Multiple personality: a social psychological perspective. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 362–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
State v. Badger, 551 207 (Atlantic Reporter 2nd Edition 1988).
Stormark, K. M. (2004). Skin conductance and heart-rate responses as indices of covert face recognition in preschool children. Infant and Child Development, 13, 423–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabbert, K., Stark, R., Kirsch, P., and Vaitl, D. (2006). Dissociation of neural responses and skin conductance reactions during fear conditioning with and without awareness of stimulus contingencies. Neuroimage, 32, 761–770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tranel, D., and Damasio, A. R. (1985). Knowledge without awareness: an autonomic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics. Science, 228, 1453–1454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tranel, D., Fowles, D. C., and Damasio, A. R. (1985). Electrodermal discrimination of familiar and unfamiliar faces: a methodology. Psychophysiology, 22, 403–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooff, J. C., Sargeant, E., Foster, J. K., and Schmand, B. A. (2009). Identifying deliberate attempts to fake memory impairment through the combined use of reaction time and event-related potential measures. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 73, 246–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verfaellie, M., Bauer, R. M., and Bowers, D. (1991). Autonomic and behavioral evidence of “implicit” memory in amnesia. Brain and Cognition, 15, 10–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiens, S., Katkin, E. S., and Ohman, A. (2003). Effects of trial order and differential conditioning on acquisition of differential shock expectancy and skin conductance conditioning to masked stimuli. Psychophysiology, 40, 989–997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×