Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:44:48.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Detecting concealed information using autonomic measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Matthias Gamer
Edited by
Bruno Verschuere ,
Gershon Ben-Shakhar  and
Ewout Meijer
Matthias Gamer
Affiliation:
University Medical Center in Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
Bruno Verschuere
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Gershon Ben-Shakhar
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Ewout Meijer
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Overview: Already in the first empirical demonstration of the Concealed Information Test (CIT), it was shown that electrodermal responses can be used to detect concealed knowledge with high accuracy. This chapter summarizes the huge number of studies on autonomic measures in the CIT that have been conducted in the last decades. Taken together, it is now well established that the recognition of crime-related items results in larger skin conductance responses, respiratory suppression, heart rate deceleration and reductions of pulse volume amplitudes when compared to neutral control items. This response pattern results from a coactivation of the sympathetic and the vagal branch of the autonomic nervous system and it is at least in part related to the orienting response. Recent studies have shown that the validity of the CIT can be further increased by systematically combining electrodermal, respiratory and heart rate responses by means of a logistic classification function. Finally, important questions for future research on autonomic measures in the CIT are outlined.

Introduction

More than fifty years ago, Lykken (1959) demonstrated that phasic skin conductance changes can be used to detect concealed knowledge with high validity. In this influential study, four groups of participants were examined. One group was asked to commit two mock crimes (a murder and a theft), thereby gaining knowledge of several crime-related details. Two more groups carried out only one of these mock crimes while remaining ignorant to the relevant details of the other scenario and a fourth group was exposed to neither of these mock crimes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Memory Detection
Theory and Application of the Concealed Information Test
 , pp. 27 - 45
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambach, W., Stark, R., Peper, M., and Vaitl, D. (2008). An interfering Go/No-go task does not affect accuracy in a Concealed Information Test. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 68, 6–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balloun, K. D. and Holmes, D. S. (1979). Effects of repeated examinations on the ability to detect guilt with a polygraph examination: a laboratory experiment with a real crime. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 316–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, R. J. (1983). Primary bradycardia and the evoked cardiac response in the OR context. Physiological Psychology, 11, 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, R. J. (1996). Preliminary process theory: towards an integrated account of the psychophysiology of cognitive processes. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 56, 469–484.Google ScholarPubMed
Ben-Shakhar, G. (1994). The roles of stimulus novelty and significance in determining the electrodermal orienting response: interactive versus additive approaches. Psychophysiology, 31, 402–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-Shakhar, G., and Dolev, K. (1996). Psychophysiological detection through the guilty knowledge technique: effects of mental countermeasures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 273–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-Shakhar, G., and Elaad, E. (2002). Effects of questions' repetition and variation on the efficiency of the guilty knowledge test: a reexamination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 972–977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-Shakhar, G., and Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ben-Shakhar, G., and Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception: A Psychophysiological and International Perspective. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Shakhar, G., Gronau, N., and Elaad, E. (1999). Leakage of relevant information to innocent examinees in the GKT: an attempt to reduce false-positive outcomes by introducing target stimuli. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 651–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Shakhar, G., Lieblich, I., and Kugelmass, S. (1975). Detection of information and GSR habituation: an attempt to derive detection efficiency from two habituation curves. Psychophysiology, 12, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berntson, G. G., Cacioppo, J. T., and Quigley, K. S. (1991). Autonomic determinism: the modes of autonomic control, the doctrine of autonomic space, and the laws of autonomic constraint. Psychological Review, 98, 459–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berntson, G. G., Quigley, K. S., and Lozano, D. (2007). Cardiovascular psychophysiology. In Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., and Bernston, G. G. (eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology (pp. 182–210). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berntson, G. G., Bigger, J. T. J., Eckberg, D. L., Grossman, P., Kaufmann, P. G., Malik, M., Nagaraja, H. N., Porges, S. W., Saul, J. P., Stone, P. H., and van der Molen, M. W. (1997). Heart rate variability: origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology, 34, 623–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, M. T., and Ainsworth, D. (1984). Alcohol and the psychophysiological detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 21, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, M. T., and Janisse, M. P. (1981). Accuracy demonstrations, threat, and the detection of deception: cardiovascular, electrodermal, and pupillary measures. Psychophysiology, 18, 307–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradley, M. T., and Rettinger, J. (1992). Awareness of crime-relevant information and the guilty knowledge test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M. A., and Lang, P. J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45, 602–607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. O. (1968). Validity of the guilty-knowledge technique: the effects of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 62–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drummond, P. D., and Lance, J. W. (1987). Facial flushing and sweating mediated by the sympathetic nervous system. Brain, 110, 793–803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elaad, E. (1990). Detection of guilty knowledge in real-life criminal investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 521–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elaad, E. (1994). The accuracy of human decisions and objective measurements in psychophysiological detection of knowledge. Journal of Psychology, 128, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elaad, E. (2009). Effects of context and state of guilt on the detection of concealed crime information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 225–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elaad, E., and Ben-Shakhar, G. (1989). Effects of motivation and verbal- response type on psychophysiological detection of information. Psychophysiology, 26, 442–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elaad, E., and Ben-Shakhar, G. (2006). Finger pulse waveform length in the detection of concealed information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 61, 226–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elaad, E., and Ben-Shakhar, G. (2008). Covert respiration measures for the detection of concealed information. Biological Psychology, 77, 284–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elaad, E., Ginton, A., and Jungman, N. (1992). Detection measures in real-life criminal guilty knowledge tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 757–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foerster, F. (1985). Psychophysiological response specificities: a replication over a 12-month period. Biological Psychology, 21, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furedy, J. J. (1985). Joint use of heart-rate and T-wave amplitude as non-invasive cardiac performance measures: a psychophysiological perspective. In Orlebeke, J. F., Mulder, G., and Doornen, L. J. P. (eds.), Psychophysiology of Cardiovascular Control (pp. 237–256). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Gamer, M., and Berti, S. (2010). Task relevance and recognition of concealed information have different influences on electrodermal activity and event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 47, 355–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamer, M., Bauermann, T., Stoeter, P., and Vossel, G. (2007). Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 1287–1301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamer, M., Rill, H.-G., Vossel, G., and Gödert, H. W. (2006). Psychophysiological and vocal measures in the detection of guilty knowledge. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 76–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamer, M., Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., and Vossel, G. (2008a). Combining physiological measures in the detection of concealed information. Physiology & Behavior, 95, 333–340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamer, M., Gödert, H. W., Keth, A., Rill, H.-G., and Vossel, G. (2008b). Electrodermal and phasic heart rate responses in the Guilty Actions Test: comparing guilty examinees to informed and uninformed innocents. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 69, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamer, M., Klimecki, O., Bauermann, T., Stoeter, P., and Vossel, G. (in press). fMRI-activation patterns in the detection of concealed information rely on memory-related effects. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.
Gruzelier, J., Eves, F., Connolly, J., and Hirsch, S. (1981). Orienting, habituation, sensitisation, and dishabituation in the electrodermal system of consecutive, drug free, admissions for schizophrenia. Biological Psychology, 12, 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honts, C. R., Devitt, M. K., Winbush, M., and Kircher, J. C. (1996). Mental and physical countermeasures reduce the accuracy of the concealed knowledge test. Psychophysiology, 33, 84–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horneman, C. J., and O'Gorman, J. G. (1985). Detectability in the card test as a function of the subject's verbal response. Psychophysiology, 22, 330–333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horvath, F. (1978). An experimental comparison of the psychological stress evaluator and the galvanic skin response in detection of deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 338–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horvath, F. (1979). Effect of different motivational instructions on detection of deception with the psychological stress evaluator and the galvanic skin response. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 323–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. C. (1974). Amplitude and habituation of the orienting reflex as a function of stimulus intensity. Psychophysiology, 11, 647–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janisse, M. P., and Bradley, M. T. (1980). Deception, information and the pupillary response. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 748–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kircher, J. C., and Raskin, D. C. (1988). Human versus computerized evaluations of polygraph data in a laboratory setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieblich, I., Kugelmass, S., and Ben-Shakhar, G. (1970). Efficiency of GSR detection of information as a function of stimulus set size. Psychophysiology, 6, 601–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorig, T. S. (2007). The respiratory system. In Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., and Bernston, G. G. (eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology (pp. 231–244). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lubow, R. E., and Fein, O. (1996). Pupillary size in response to a visual guilty knowledge test: new technique for the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 164–177.Google Scholar
Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lykken, D. T. (1960). The validity of the guilty knowledge technique: the effects of faking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 258–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lykken, D. T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detector industry. American Psychologist, 29, 725–739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLaren, V. V. (2001). A quantitative review of the guilty knowledge test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 674–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meijer, E. H., Smulders, F. T., Johnston, J. E., and Merckelbach, H. L. (2007). Combining skin conductance and forced choice in the detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 44, 814–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavlidis, I., Eberhardt, N. L., and Levine, J. A. (2002). Seeing through the face of deception. Nature, 415, 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podlesny, J. A., and Kircher, J. C. (1999). The finapres (volume clamp) recording method in psychophysiological detection of deception examinations. Forensic Science Communications, 1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Podlesny, J. A., and Raskin, D. C. (1977). Physiological measures and the detection of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 782–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podlesny, J. A., and Raskin, D. C. (1978). Effectiveness of techniques and physiological measures in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 15, 344–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollina, D. A., Dollins, A. B., Senter, S. M., Brown, T. E., Pavlidis, I., Levine, J. A., and Ryan, A. H. (2006). Facial skin surface temperature changes during a “concealed information” test. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 34, 1182–1189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posey, J. A., Geddes, L. A., Williams, H., and Moore, A. G. (1969). The meaning of the point of maximum oscillations in cuff pressure in the indirect measurement of blood pressure. Part I. Cardiovascular Research Center Bulletin, 8, 15–25.Google Scholar
Rashba, E. J., Cooklin, M., MacMurdy, K., Kavesh, N., Kirk, M., Sarang, S., Peters, R. W., Shorofsky, S. R., and Gold, M. R. (2002). Effects of selective autonomic blockade on T-wave alternans in humans. Circulation, 105, 837–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raskin, D. C., and Hare, R. D. (1978). Psychopathy and detection of deception in a prison population. Psychophysiology, 15, 126–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siddle, D. A., O'Gorman, J. G., and Wood, L. (1979). Effects of electrodermal lability and stimulus significance on electrodermal response amplitude to stimulus change. Psychophysiology, 16, 520–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slowik, S. M., and Buckley, J. P. (1975). Relative accuracy of polygraph examiner diagnosis of respiration, blood pressure, and GSR recordings. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 3, 305–309.Google Scholar
Sokolov, E. N. (1963). Perception and the Conditioned Reflex. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Stekelenburg, J. J., and Boxtel, A. (2002). Pericranial muscular, respiratory, and heart rate components of the orienting response. Psychophysiology, 39, 707–722.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, R., Nakayama, M., and Furedy, J. J. (2004). Specific and reactive sensitivities of skin resistance response and respiratory apnea in a Japanese concealed information test (CIT) of criminal guilt. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 36, 202–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thackray, R. I., and Orne, M. T. (1968). A comparison of physiological indices in detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 4, 329–339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timm, H. W. (1982). Analyzing deception from respiratory patterns. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 10, 47–51.Google Scholar
Vandenbosch, K., Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., and Clercq, A. (2009). The validity of finger pulse line length for the detection of concealed information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 71, 118–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Clercq, A., and Koster, E. H. W. (2004). Autonomic and behavioral responding to concealed information: differentiating orienting and defensive responses. Psychophysiology, 41, 461–466.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Clercq, A., and Koster, E. H. W. (2005). Psychopathic traits and autonomic responding to concealed information in a prison sample. Psychophysiology, 42, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Smolders, L., and Clercq, A. (2009). Differentiating orienting and defensive responses to concealed information: the role of verbalization. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 34, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Koster, E. H. W., and Clercq, A. (2007a). Antisociality, underarousal and the validity of the Concealed Information Polygraph Test. Biological Psychology, 74, 309–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., Koster, E. H. W., Bockstaele, B., and Clercq, A. (2007b). Startling secrets: startle eye blink modulation by concealed crime information. Biological Psychology, 76, 52–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waid, W. M., and Orne, M. T. (1980). Individual differences in electrodermal lability and the detection of information and deception. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waid, W. M., Orne, M. T., and Wilson, S. K. (1979). Effects of level of socialization on electrodermal detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 16, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waid, W. M., Orne, E. C., Cook, M. R., and Orne, M. T. (1978). Effects of attention, as indexed by subsequent memory, on electrodermal detection of information. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 728–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallin, B. G. (1981). Sympathetic nerve activity underlying electrodermal and cardiovascular reactions in man. Psychophysiology, 18, 470–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willrich, A. T., Adler, I., Rill, H., Gödert, H.-G., and Vossel, G. (2003). Detection of concealed knowledge: the effects of written versus pictorial stimulus presentation on skin conductance responses and phasic heart rate. Journal of Psychophysiology, 16, 252.Google Scholar
Wölk, C., Velden, M., Zimmermann, U., and Krug, S. (1989). The interrelation between phasic blood pressure and heart rate changes in the context of the “baroreceptor hypothesis”. Journal of Psychophysiology, 3, 397–402.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×