Defending a Role for Mercy in a Criminal Justice System

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139030656.006

3 - Defending a Role for Mercy in a Criminal Justice System

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 December 2011

Austin Sarat

Jim Staihar and

Stephen Macedo

Show author details

Austin Sarat: Affiliation:
Amherst College, Massachusetts

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Susan Atkins participated in several murders during 1969 as part of the notorious Manson family. Although originally sentenced to death, her punishment was soon commuted to life when California temporarily abolished the death penalty in 1972. By most accounts, she was a model prisoner who worked frequently to help fellow inmates. During her last parole hearing in 2009, she requested a compassionate release from further incarceration. She was suffering greatly from terminal brain cancer, recently had one leg amputated, was bedridden, had difficulty even speaking, and was paralyzed on one side of her body. The parole board denied her request, emphasizing the seriousness of her crimes and the lack of any excuses for them. She died less than a month later in a prison nursing facility.

Pan Am Flight 103 blew up over Lockerbie, Scotland, in December 1988. There were 270 fatalities. The catastrophe resulted from a bomb exploding in the luggage compartment of the plane. In 2001, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi, a Libyan, was convicted of being involved in planting the bomb. A Scottish court sentenced him to life. By August 2009, Megrahi was suffering from prostate cancer and given a short time to live. In that month, Scotland granted him a compassionate release to return home to Libya.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Merciful Judgments and Contemporary Society
Legal Problems, Legal Possibilities
, pp. 138 - 194

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030656.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Nozick, RobertAnarchy, State, and UtopiaNew YorkBasic Books 1974 30Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A.Prolegomenon to the Principles of PunishmentPunishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of LawNew YorkOxford University Press 1968 8Google Scholar

Husak, Douglas N.Why Punish the Deserving?Noûs 26 1992 459CrossRef Google Scholar

Murphy, JeffrieMercy and Legal JusticeForgiveness and MercyNew YorkCambridge University Press 1988 165CrossRef Google Scholar

Smart, AlwynneMercyPhilosophy 43 1968 350CrossRef Google Scholar

Rawls, JohnA Theory of JusticeCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 1971 157Google Scholar

Feldman, RichardEpistemologyUpper Saddle River, NJPrentice Hall 2003 122Google Scholar

Garcia, J. L. A.Two Concepts of DesertLaw and Philosophy 5 1986 219CrossRef Google Scholar

Morris, HerbertPersons and PunishmentTheories of PunishmentBloomingtonIndiana University Press 1971 76Google Scholar

Murphy, JeffrieMarxism and RetributionPhilosophy and Public Affairs 2 1973 217Google Scholar

Sher, GeorgeDesertPrinceton, NJPrinceton University Press 1987 69Google Scholar

Dagger, RichardPlaying Fair with PunishmentEthics 103 1993 473CrossRef Google Scholar

Burgh, RichardDo the Guilty Deserve Punishment?Journal of Philosophy 79 1982 193CrossRef Google Scholar

Dolinko, DavidSome Thoughts about RetributivismEthics 101 1991 545CrossRef Google Scholar

Matravers, MattJustice and Punishment: The Rationale of CoercionNew YorkOxford University Press 2000 45CrossRef Google Scholar

Boonin, DavidThe Problem of PunishmentNew YorkCambridge University Press 2008 119CrossRef Google Scholar

Dimock, SusanRetributivism and TrustLaw and Philosophy 16 1997 37Google Scholar

Hoekema, David A.Trust and Obey: Toward a New Theory of PunishmentIsrael Law Review 25 1991 332CrossRef Google Scholar

Brandt, R. B.Blameworthiness and ObligationEssays in Moral PhilosophySeattleUniversity of Washington Press 1958 3Google Scholar

Gottfredson, Michael R.Hirschi, TravisA General Theory of CrimePalo Alto, CAStanford University Press 1990 107Google Scholar

Britt, Chester L.VersatilityThe Generality of DevianceNew Brunswick, NJTransaction Publishers 1994 173Google Scholar

Piquero, AlexPaternoster, RaymondMazerolle, PaulBrame, RobertDean, Charles W.Onset Age and Offense SpecializationJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 36 1999 275CrossRef Google Scholar

Simon, Leonore M. J.Do Criminal Offenders Specialize in Crime Types?Applied and Preventive Psychology 6 1997 35CrossRef Google Scholar

Miller, Joshua D.Lynam, DonaldStructural Models of Personality and Their Relation to Antisocial Behavior: A Meta-Analytic ReviewCriminology 39 2001 765CrossRef Google Scholar

McCord, JoanUnderstanding Motivations: Considering Altruism and AggressionFacts, Frameworks, and ForecastsNew Brunswick, NJTransaction Publishers 1992 126Google Scholar

Hobbes, ThomasLeviathanNew YorkCambridge University Press 1996Google Scholar

Baier, AnnetteTrust and AntitrustEthics 96 1986 235CrossRef Google Scholar

Robinson, Paul H.Darley, John M.Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioral Science InvestigationOxford Journal of Legal Studies 24 2004 173CrossRef Google Scholar

Robinson, Paul H.Darley, John M.The Role of Deterrence in the Formulation of Criminal Law Rules: At Its Worst When Doing Its BestGeorgetown Law Journal 91 2003 954Google Scholar

Dixit, AvinashSkeath, SusanGames of StrategyNew YorkW. W. Norton 2004 263Google Scholar

Bacharach, MichaelGambetta, DiegoTrust in SignsTrust in SocietyNew YorkRussell Sage Foundation 2001Google Scholar

McBride, KeallyPunishment and Political OrderAnn ArborUniversity of Michigan Press 2007 136CrossRef Google Scholar

Duff, R. A.Punishment, Communication, and CommunityNew YorkOxford University Press 2001 106Google Scholar

Feinberg, JoelThe Expressive Function of PunishmentDoing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of ResponsibilityPrincetonPrinceton University Press 1970 95Google Scholar

Holmes, O. W.The Common LawBostonLittle, Brown 1881 3Google Scholar

Harman, Gilbert H.The Inference to the Best ExplanationPhilosophical Review 74 1965 88CrossRef Google Scholar

Frank, Robert H.Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the EmotionsNew YorkW. W. Norton 1988 161Google Scholar

von Hirsch, AndrewDesert and Previous Convictions in SentencingMinnesota Law Review 65 1981 593Google Scholar

Staihar, JimA New Systematic Explanation of the Types and Mitigating Effects of Exculpatory DefensesNew Criminal Law Review 12 2009 205Google Scholar

Scanlon, T. M.What We Owe to Each OtherCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 1998 279Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F.Freedom and ResentmentFreedom and Resentment and Other EssaysLondonMethuen 1974 7Google Scholar

Watson, GaryResponsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian ThemePerspectives on Moral ResponsibilityIthaca, NYCornell University Press 1993 123Google Scholar

Gardner, JohnThe Gist of ExcusesBuffalo Criminal Law Review 1 1997 575CrossRef Google Scholar

Bayles, Michael D.Character, Purpose, and Criminal ResponsibilityLaw and Philosophy 1 1982 5CrossRef Google Scholar

Bayles, Michael D.Hume on Blame and ExcuseHume Studies 2 1976 17Google Scholar

Brandt, R. B.A Motivational Theory of Excuses in the Criminal LawCriminal Justice: Nomos XXVIINew YorkNew York University Press 1985 165Google Scholar

Hume, DavidA Treatise of Human NatureNew YorkOxford University Press 1978 412Google Scholar

Arenella, PeterCharacter, Choice and Moral AgencySocial Philosophy and Policy 7 1990 59CrossRef Google Scholar

Tadros, VictorCriminal ResponsibilityNew YorkOxford University Press 2005 293Google Scholar

Duff, R. A.Trials and PunishmentsNew YorkCambridge University Press 2005 14Google Scholar

Copp, DavidOught’ Implies ‘Can’, Blameworthiness, and the Principle of Alternate PossibilitiesMoral Responsibility and Alternative PossibilitiesBurlington, VTAshgate 2003 271Google Scholar

Darwall, StephenThe Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and AccountabilityCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 2006 96Google Scholar

Kant, ImmanuelThe Metaphysics of MoralsNew YorkCambridge University Press 1996 6CrossRef Google Scholar

LaFave, Wayne R.Israel, Jerold H.King, Nancy J.Criminal Procedure: Hornbook SeriesSt. Paul, MNWest 2004 875Google Scholar

Robinson, Paul H.Criminal Law Defenses: A Systematic AnalysisColumbia Law Review 82 1982 229CrossRef Google Scholar

Reid, ThomasOf Mr. Locke's Account of Our Personal IdentityPersonal IdentityBerkeleyUniversity of California Press 1975 113Google Scholar

Williams, BernardThe Self and the FutureProblems of the SelfNew YorkCambridge University Press 1973 46CrossRef Google Scholar

Parfit, DerekPersonal IdentityPhilosophical Review 80 1971 3CrossRef Google Scholar

Parfit, DerekReasons and PersonsNew YorkClarendon Press 1984 204Google Scholar

Shoemaker, SydneyPersons and Their PastsAmerican Philosophical Quarterly 7 1970 269Google Scholar

Tasioulas, JohnMercyProceedings of the Aristotelian Society 103 2003 101CrossRef Google Scholar

Kolnai, AurelForgivenessProceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74 1973 101Google Scholar

Murphy, JeffrieForgiveness and MercyNew YorkCambridge University Press 1988 24CrossRef Google Scholar

Griswold, Charles L.Forgiveness: A Philosophical ExplorationNew YorkCambridge University Press 2007 50CrossRef Google Scholar

Williams, BernardA Critique of UtilitarianismUtilitarianism: For and AgainstNew YorkCambridge University Press 1973 93Google Scholar

Quinn, WarrenActions, Intentions, and Consequences: The Doctrine of Doing and AllowingPhilosophical Review 98 1989 287CrossRef Google Scholar

Scheffler, SamuelDoing and AllowingEthics 114 2004 215CrossRef Google Scholar

Parfit, DerekEquality or Priority?The Ideal of EqualityNew YorkSt. Martin's Press 2000 100Google Scholar

Brien, AndrewMercy within Legal JusticeSocial Theory and Practice 24 1998 87CrossRef Google Scholar

Moore, Michael S.Justifying RetributivismIsrael Law Review 27 1993 19CrossRef Google Scholar

Moore, G. E.Principia EthicaNew YorkCambridge University Press 1993 82Google Scholar

Samaha, Adam M.William and Mary Law Review 51 2009 1

Dolinko, DavidOhio State Journal of Criminal Law 4 2007 358

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.