Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 November 2022
1. The context: The speculative realist challenge
The context for the present comparative study of Merleau-Ponty and Nancy is provided by the challenge that the speculative realist movement addressed to post-Kantian Continental thought in general, and phenomenology in particular. While the popularity of speculative realism as a movement might have waned since its inception in 2007, the challenge it raised against Continental thinkers remains important. Not only do Merleau-Ponty and Nancy, I will seek to argue, have the means to take up this challenge, but doing so allows us to bring to the fore the originality of their respective thinking.
As is well known by now, the speculative realist movement sprang out of a one-day workshop held at Goldsmiths College in April 2007, a little more than a year after the publication of Quentin Meillassoux's book Après la finitude. The impetus for the original event was, as Brassier describes it, ‘to revive questions about realism, materialism, science, representation, and objectivity, that were dismissed as otiose by each of the main pillars of Continental orthodoxy: phenomenology, critical theory, and deconstruction’. ‘Speculative realism’ thus became, at least for a while, the name of a movement toward a revival of realist and materialist metaphysics as an attempt to counter what was seen as the dominance of a certain legacy of transcendental idealism in Continental philosophy, reflected above all in its focus on the subject, its critical limitation of knowledge to the phenomenal world, and its rejection of speculative metaphysics.
The various projects grouped under the banner of ‘speculative realism’ might not have as much in common as was first thought, except for their call to revive some form of realist metaphysics or another. What interests me in the present study is not so much the positive philosophical programmes developed by the various thinkers grouped under this banner but rather the way in which they describe and challenge their common enemy: post-Kantian thought. Almost without exception, speculative realists maintain that ‘things went grossly awry when Kant, having been roused from his dogmatic slumbers by the challenge of Humean scepticism, responded by announcing his “Copernican revolution” in epistemology’.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.