Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 December 2009
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Methodology of Experimental Economics , pp. 255 - 273Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
(1989) “The New Experimentalism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40: 185–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allais, M. (1953) “The Foundations of a Positive Theory of Choice Involving Risk and a Criticism of the Postulate and Axioms of the American School,” in and (eds. 1979) Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 257–332Google Scholar
American Economic Review (1992) Symposium on “Theory and Misbehavior of First-price Auctions.” Vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 1374–443
, , and (1998) “A Theoretical Analysis of Altruism and Decision Error in Public Goods Games,” Journal of Public Economics 70: 297–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) “Warm Glow vs. Cold Prickle: The Effects of Positive and Negative Framing on Cooperation in Experiments,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) “Model Organisms as Models: Understanding the ‘Lingua Franca’ of the Human Genome Project,” Philosophy of Science 68: S251–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. and (1996) “Deficit Reduction through Diversity: A Case Study of How Affirmative Action at the FCC Increased Auction Competition,” Stanford Law Review 48: 761–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, R. E. (1994) “The Lakatosian Legacy in Economic Methodology,” in (ed.) New Directions in Economic Methodology. London: Routledge, pp. 173–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(in press) “Experimental Economics and the ‘Artificiality of Alteration,’” Journal of Economic MethodologyGoogle Scholar
, , and (1963) “Stochastic Models of Choice Behaviour,” Behavioral Science 8: 41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1964) “Measuring Utility by a Single-Response Sequential Method,” Behavioral Science 9: 226–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and (1985) “Preference Reversal and Arbitrage,” Research in Experimental Economics 3: 31–71Google Scholar
and (1997) Experiments with Economic Principles: Microeconomics. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
and (1982) “External Validity Is More than Skin Deep,” American Psychologist 37: 245–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1865) Introduction à l'étude de la Medicine Experimentale. Paris: Flammarion; Engl. transl. Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. New York: Henri Schumann, 1957Google Scholar
and (2001) “Financial Incentives Do Not Pave the Road to Good Experimentation,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 404Google Scholar
and (2002) “The Biggest Auction Ever: The Sale of the British 3G Telecom Licences,” Economic Journal 112: C74–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000) “Ceteris Paribus Conditions: Materiality and the Application of Economic Theory,” Journal of Economic Methodology 8: 11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
(1955) “Representative Design and Probabilistic Theory in a Functional Psychology,” Psychological Review 62: 193–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) The Creation of Scientific Effects. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (in press) “Heterogeneous Agents in Public Goods Experiments,” Experimental EconomicsGoogle Scholar
Burlando, R. M. and P. Webley (1999) “Individual Differences and Long-run Equilibria in a Public Good Experiment,” in Inquiries into the Nature and Causes of Behavior. Proceedings of the 24th IAREP Annual Colloquium, Belgirate, Italy
, , and (2000) “Mutually Destructive Bidding: The FCC Auction Design Problem,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 17: 205–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camerer, C. F. (1995) “Individual Decision Making,” in and (eds.) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 587–703Google Scholar
and (1999) “The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19: 7–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (in press) “Neuroecono-mics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics,” Journal of Economic PerspectivesGoogle Scholar
, , and (1999) “The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions: Reply,” American Economic Review 89: 325–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1963) Experimental and Quasi–Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNallyGoogle Scholar
, , and (1971) “Competitive Bidding in High-Risk Situations,” Journal of Petroleum Technology 23: 641–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) “Replicability, Reproducibility, and Robustness: Comments on Harry Collins,” History of Political Economy 23: 143–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, S. H. and K. MacCrimmon (1979) “Alpha-Nu Choice Theory: A Generalization of Expected Utility Theory,” Working Paper no. 686. Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration, University of British Columbia
and (1990) “The Subsidence of Preference Reversals in Simplified and Marketlike Experimental Settings: A Note,” American Economic Review 80: 902–11Google Scholar
(1994) “A Strong Confirmation of the Experimenter's Regress,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 25: 493–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1993) The Golem: What You Should Know about Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1979) Quasi–experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNallyGoogle Scholar
, , and (1999) “The Winner's Curse and Public Information in Common Value Auctions: Comment,” American Economic Review 89: 319–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1989) “Preference Reversals without the Independence Axiom,” American Economic Review 79: 408–26Google Scholar
and (1996) “The Preference Reversal Phenomenon: Response Mode, Markets and Incentives,” Economic Theory 7: 381–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. C. and R. M. Isaac (1986) “Experimental Economics and Experimental Psychology: Ever the Twain Shall Meet?,” in and (eds.) Economic Psychology: Interactions in Theory and Application. New York: North Holland, pp. 647–69Google Scholar
Cox, J. C., B. Robertson, and V. L. Smith (1982) “Theory and Behavior of Single Object Auctions,” in (ed.) Research in Experimental Economics. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, pp. 1–43Google Scholar
(1995) “Money Out of Thin Air: The Nationwide Narrowband PCS Auction,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 4: 267–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) “The FCC Spectrum Auctions: An Early Assessment,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6: 431–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “The Efficiency of the FCC Spectrum Auctions,” Journal of Law and Economics 41: 727–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000) “Collusive Bidding: Lessons from the FCC Spectrum Auction,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 17: 229–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982) “The Duhem-Quine Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in Macroeconomics,” Economic Journal 92: 320–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(in press) “Experiments and the Domain of Economic Theory,” Journal of Economic MethodologyGoogle Scholar
, , and (2001) “Discovered Preferences and the Experimental Evidence of Violations of Expected Utility Theory,” Journal of Economic Methodology 8: 385–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds. 1992) The Laboratory Revolution in Medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1988) “Anomalies: Cooperation,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2: 187–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “Is the Tâtonnement Hypothesis a Good Caricature of Market Forces?,” Journal of Economic Methodology 5: 201–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979) “Bayesian Personalism, the Methodology of Research Programmes, and Duhem's Problem,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 10: 177–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1906) La théorie physique. Son objet et sa structure. Paris: Chevalier et Rivière; Engl. transl. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1954Google Scholar
(1984) “Probabilistic Causality Emancipated,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9: 169–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, J. (2001) “Economics without Mechanism,” in (ed.) The Economic World View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 308–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
and (1980) “Relativity and the Eclipses: The British Eclipse Expedition and Their Predecessors,” Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 11: 49–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economics Focus (1999) “News from the Lab,” The Economist, May 8, p. 96
Ehrhart, K. M. and C. Keser (1199) “Mobility and Cooperation: On the Run,” Working Paper 99s–24, CIRANO, University of Montreal
Falk, A. and U. Fischbacher (2000) “A Theory of Reciprocity,” Working Paper 6/2000. Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, University of Zurich
and (2002) “Why Social Preferences Matter – The Impact of Non-selfish Motives on Competition, Cooperation and Incentives,” Economic Journal 112: C1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2001) “Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment,” Economics Letters 71: 397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischhoff, B. (1982) “Debiasing,” in , , and (eds.) Judgment under Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 422–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) “The Real World: What Good Is It?,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 65: 232–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1910) “Experimental Poliomyelitis in Monkeys; Active Immunization and Passive Serum Protection,” Journal of the American Medical Association 54: 1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1974) “Special Sciences (or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis),” Synthese 28: 97–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1994) “How to Tell When Simpler, More Unified, or Less Ad Hoc Theories Will Provide More Accurate Predictions,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45: 1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, M. and E. Sober (in press) “Why Likelihood?,” in and (eds.) The Nature of Scientific Evidence. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
, , and (1993) “Does Studying Economics Inhibit Cooperation?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 159–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) “How to Avoid the Experimenter's Regress,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 15: 51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, A. (1998) “Experiment in Physics,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physics-experiment
and (2003) “Are Political Economists Selfish and Indoctrinated? Evidence from a Natural Experiment,” Economic Inquiry 41: 448–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004) Economics Lab: An Intensive Course in Experimental Economics. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
and (1994) Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. (1953) “The Methodology of Positive Economics,” in Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3–43
(1999) Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gachter, S. and C. Thoni (2004) “Social Learning and Voluntary Cooperation among Like-Minded People,” unpublished paper, University of St. Gallen
Giere, R. N. (1977) “Testing vs. Information Models of Scientific Inference,” in (ed.) Logic, Laws, and Life: Some Philosophical Complications. University of Pittsburgh Series in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 6. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 19–70Google Scholar
Giere, R. N. (1983) “Testing Theoretical Hypotheses,” in (ed.) Testing Scientific Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 10. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 269–98Google Scholar
Giere, R. N. (2002) “Models as Parts of Distributed Cognitive Systems,” in and (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values. New York: Kluwer, pp. 227–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and the ABC Research Group (1999) Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
(1991) “Intersubjective Probability and Confirmation Theory,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42: 513–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) “Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation,” Philosophy of Science 69: S342–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980) “Testing for Causality: A Personal Viewpoint,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 2: 329–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1979) “Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon,” American Economic Review 69: 623–38Google Scholar
(1998) “Experiments as Mediators in the Non-Laboratory Sciences,” Philosophica 62: 901–18Google Scholar
(1999) “The Problem of External Validity (or ‘Parallelism’) in Experimental Economics,” Social Science Information 38: 555–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000a) “Artefacts in Experimental Economics: Preference Reversals and the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Mechanism,” Economics and Philosophy 16: 47–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000b) “The Logic of Normative Falsification: Rationality and Experiments in Decision Theory,” Journal of Economic Methodology 7: 59–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) “Building Economic Machines: The FCC Auctions,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 32: 453–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, F. (2002a) “Models, Simulations, and Experiments,” in and (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values. New York: Kluwer, pp. 59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002b) “On the Scope of Experiments in Economics: Comments on Siakantaris,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 26: 261–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) “Experimental Localism and External Validity,” Philosophy of Science 70: 1195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, F. and L. Mittone (2002) “Experiments in Economics: Testing Theories vs. the Robustness of Phenomena,” CEEL Working Paper 09–02, University of Trento
(1988) “The Participant Irrealist at Large in the Laboratory,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39: 277–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989) “Extragalactic Reality: The Case of Gravitational Lensing,” Philosophy of Science 56: 555–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1992) “The Self-Vindication of the Laboratory Sciences,” in (ed.) Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 29–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Reflection without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves Heap, S. and Y. Varoufakis (1995) “Experimenting with Neoclassical Economics: A Critical Review of Experimental Economics,” in (ed.) Measurement, Quantification and Economic Analysis. London: RoutledgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989) “Theory and Misbehavior of First-Price Auctions,” American Economic Review 79: 749–62Google Scholar
(1994) “Expected Utility Theory and the Experimentalists,” Empirical Economics 19: 223–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989) “Ceteris Paribus Clauses and Causality in Economics,” PSA 1988, Vol. 2. East Lansing: Philosophy of Science AssociationGoogle Scholar
(1990) “Supply and Demand Explanations and Their Ceteris Paribus Clauses,” Review of Political Economy 2: 168–87; reprinted in Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992Google Scholar
(1992a) The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D. M. (1992b) “Why Look under the Hood?,” in Essays in Philosophy and Economic Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–3
(1998b) “Problems with Realism in Economics,” Economics and Philosophy 14: 185–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) “Revealed Preference, Belief, and Game Theory,” Economics and Philosophy 16: 99–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) “Explanation and Diagnosis in Economics,” Revue internationale de philosophie 217: 311–26Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. (unpublished) “Probabilistic Causality and Practical Causal Generalizations,” University of Wisconsin-Madison
Hausman, D. M. and P. Mongin (1998) “Economists' Responses to Anomalies: Full-Cost Pricing versus Preference Reversals,” in (ed.) New Economics and Its History. History of Political Economy Supplement, Vol. 29. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 255–72Google Scholar
(1952) Fundamentals of Concept-Formation in Empirical Science. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
(1980) “The Purposes of Laboratory Experimentation and the Virtues of Deliberate Artificiality,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 16: 466–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1953) “An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable Utility,” Econometrica 47: 291–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2001) “Experimental Practices in Economics: A Methodological Challenge for Psychologists?,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 383–451Google ScholarPubMed
and (eds. 1986) Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
and (1907) “Experimental Studies Relating to Ship-Beri-Beri and Scurvy. II., On the Etiology of Scurvy,” Journal of Hygiene 7: 634–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986) “Preference Reversals and the Independence Axiom,” American Economic Review 76: 508–15Google Scholar
(1989) “Towards a Typology of Experimental Error: An Epistemological View,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20: 469–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. I. G. (1999) “The Ising Model, Computer Simulation, and Universal Physics,” in and (eds.) Models as Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 97–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1987) La mano invisibile. Bari: Laterza; Engl. transl. The Invisible Hand. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990Google Scholar
, , and (1985) “Public Goods Provision in an Experimental Environment,” Journal of Public Economics 26: 51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998) “Nash as an Organizing Principle in the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods: An Experimental Analysis,” Experimental Economics 1: 191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1984) “Divergent Evidence on Free-Riding: An Experimental Examination of Possible Explanations,” Public Choice 43: 113–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986) “The Winner's Curse Phenomenon and Public Information in Common Value Auctions,” American Economic Review 76: 894–920Google Scholar
and (eds. 1995) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1987) “‘Preference Reversal’ and the Observability of Preferences by Experimental Methods,” Econometrica 55: 675–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1993) “The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Mechanism and Generalized Utility Theories: Theoretical Predictions and Empirical Observations,” Theory and Decision 34: 83–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) “Voluntary Contributions to a Public Good When Partial Contribution Is a Dominant Strategy,” Economics Letters 50: 359–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1984) “The Free Rider Problem: Experimental Evidence,” Public Choice 43: 3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
(2002) “How (Not) to Run Auctions: The European 3G Telecom Auctions,” European Economic Review 46: 829–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knez, M. and V. L. Smith (1987) “Hypothetical Valuations and Preference Reversals in the Context of Asset Trading,” in (ed.) Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W. (1975) “The Human Subject in the Psychology Experiment: Fact and Artifact,” in (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 8. New York: Academic Press, pp. 101–47Google Scholar
(1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2nd ed. 1970Google Scholar
Kwerel, E. R. (2004) “Foreword,” in , Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. ⅹⅴ–ⅹⅹⅱCrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2000) “An Insider's View of FCC Spectrum Auctions,” Journal of Regulatory Economics 17: 253–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995) “Two Models of Models in Biomedical Research,” Philosophical Quarterly 45: 141–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970) “Falsificationism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp. 8–101
Lakatos, I. (1974) “Popper on Demarcation and Induction,” in The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978, pp. 139–67
(1984) Les microbes: guerre et paix. Paris: Métailié; Engl. transl. The Pasteurisation of France. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1988Google Scholar
(1988) “Comments on ‘The Sociology of Knowledge of Child Abuse’,” Nous 22: 67–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2nd ed. 1986Google Scholar
(ed. 1976) Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledyard, J. O. (1995) “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research,” in and (eds.) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 111–94Google Scholar
, , and (1997) “Experiments Testing Multiobject Allocation Mechanisms,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6: 639–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K. S. (unpublished) “Rationality, Minds, and Machines in the Laboratory: A Thematic History of Vernon Smith's Experimental Economics,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Notre Dame
Leonard, R. (1994) “Laboratory Strife: Higgling as Experimental Science in Economics and Social Psychology,” in and (eds.) Higgling. History of Political Economy Supplement, Vol. 26. Durham: Duke University PressGoogle Scholar
and (1968) “Relative Importance of Probabilities and Payoffs in Risk-Taking,” Journal of Experimental Psychology Supplement, Part 2: 1–18Google Scholar
and (1971) “Reversals of Preference Between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1973) “Response-Induced Reversals of Preference in Gambling: An Extended Replication in Las Vegas,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 101: 16–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Experimental Economics from the Vantage-Point of Behavioral Economics,” Economic Journal 109: F25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loomes, G. (1989) “Experimental Economics,” in (ed.) Current Issues in Microeconomics. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 152–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1989) “Preference Reversal: Information-Processing Effect or Rational Non-Transitive Choice?,” Economic Journal 99: 140–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1995) “Incorporating a Stochastic Element into Decision Theories,” European Economic Review 39: 641–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982) “‘Expected Utility’ Analysis without the Independence Axiom,” Econometrica 50: 277–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) “Scientific Realism and Some Peculiarities of Economics,” Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 69: 424–65Google Scholar
Mäki, U. (2001a) “Models,” in and (eds.) The International Encyclopaedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 15. London: Elsevier, pp. 9931–7Google Scholar
(2001b) “Explanatory Unification: Double and Doubtful,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31: 488–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(in press) “Models Are Experiments, Experiments Are Models,” Journal of Economic MethodologyGoogle Scholar
Mäki, U. and J. P. Piimies (1998) “Ceteris Paribus,” in , , and (eds.) The Handbook of Economic Methodology. Cheltenham: Elgar, pp. 55–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1950) “Rational Behaviour, Uncertain Prospects, and Measurable Utility,” Econometrica 18: 111–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1981) “Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else?,” Journal of Public Economics 15: 295–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997b) “Error Statistics and Learning from Error: Making a Virtue of Necessity,” Philosophy of Science 64: S195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1996) “Analyzing the Airwaves Auction,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 159–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1917) “The ‘Vitamine’ Hypothesis and Deficiency Diseases. A Study of Experimental Scurvy,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 31: 229–53Google Scholar
, , and (1997) “Introduction,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6: 425–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1983) “The Rate of Return Earned by Leases Under Cash Bonus Bidding in the OCS Oil and Gas Leases,” Energy Journal 4: 37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1985) “Workers' Compensation and Injury Duration: Evidence from a Natural Experiment,” American Economic Review 85: 322–40Google Scholar
(1946) La perception de la causalité. Louvain: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie; Engl. transl. The Perception of Causality. London: Methuen, 1963Google Scholar
(1989) “Auctions and Bidding: A Primer,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milgrom, P. (1995) “Auctioning the Radio Spectrum,” preliminary draft of Milgrom (2004, Ch. 1). http://www.market-design.com/library.html
(1998) “Game Theory and the Spectrum Auctions,” European Economic Review 42: 771–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) “Putting Auction Theory to Work: The Simultaneous Ascending Auction,” Journal of Political Economy 108: 245–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1982) “A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding,” Econometrica 50: 1089–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1836) “On the Definition of Political Economy and the Method of Investigation Proper to It,” in Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. 4. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1967, pp. 120–64
Miller, D. (2002) “Induction: A Problem Solved,” in , , and (eds.) Karl Poppers kritischer Rationalismus heute. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 81–106Google Scholar
(2002) Paving Wall Street: Experimental Economics and the Quest for the Perfect Market. New York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
(1961) “Caratteri espressi e intenzionali dei movimenti: la percezione dell'attesa,” Rivista di psicologia 55: 157–79Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. and E. Nik-Kah (2004) “Markets Made Flesh: Callon, Performativty, and a Crisis in Science Studies, Augmented with Considerations of the FCC Auctions,” unpublished paper, University of Notre Dame
(1988) “Problèmes de Duhem en théorie de l'utilité espérée,” Fundamenta Scientiae 9: 299–327Google Scholar
(2000) “Les préférences révélées et la formation de la théorie de la demande,” Revue économique 51: 1125–52Google Scholar
(2002) “La conception déductive de l'explication scientifique et l'économie,” Social Science Information 41:139–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) “Models, Stories, and the Economic World,” Journal of Economic Methodology 8: 361–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M. S. (2002) “Model Experiments and Models in Experiments,” in and (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values. New York: Kluwer, pp. 41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M. S. and M. Boumans (2004) “The Secrets Hidden by Two-Dimensionality: Modelling the Economy as a Hydraulic System,” in and (eds.) Models: The Third Dimension of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 369–401Google Scholar
Morrison, M. C. (1998a) “Experiment,” in (ed.) The Routledge Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. London: Routledge, pp. 514–8Google Scholar
(1998b) “Mediating Models: Between Physics and the Physical World,” Philosophia Naturalis 35: 65–85Google Scholar
Morrison, M. C. and M. S. Morgan (1999) “Models as Mediating Instruments,” in and (eds.) Models as Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1986) “Replication and Mere Replication,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16: 21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Nik-Kah, E. (unpublished) “Designs on the Mechanism,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Notre Dame
Nobel Press Release (2002) “The Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel” http://www.nobel.se/economics/laureates/2002/
(1996) “Are Thought Experiments Just What You Thought?,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26: 333–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1996) “Value Orientations, Expectations, and Voluntary Contributions in Public Goods,” Economic Journal 106: 817–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, T., L. Putterman, and B. Unel (2002) “Voluntary Association in Public Goods Experiments: Reciprocity, Mimicry, and Efficiency,” working paper, Brown University
and (1996) “Altruism, Reputation and Noise in Linear Public Goods Experiments,” Journal of Public Economics 61: 409–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1997) “Anomalous Behavior in Public Goods Experiments: How Much and Why?,” American Economic Review 87: 829–46Google Scholar
(1881) “Compte rendu sommaire des expériences rates á Pouilly-le-Fort, prés Melun, sur la vaccination charbonneuse,” Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Science 92: 1378–83; Engl. tr. “Summary Report of the Experiments Conducted at Pouilly-le-Fort, Near Melun, on the Anthrax Vaccination,” Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 75 (2002): 59–62Google Scholar
(2000) Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
(1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C. R. (1981) “Experimental Methods in Political Economy: A Tool for Regulatory Research,” in (ed.) Attacking Regulatory Problems. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, pp. 117–43Google Scholar
Plott, C. R. (1987) “Dimensions of Parallelism: Some Policy Applications of Experimental Methods,” in (ed.) Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 193–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) “Will Economics Become an Experimental Science?,” Southern Economic Journal 57: 901–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C. R. (1995) “Rational Individual Behaviour in Markets and Social Choice Processes: The Discovered Preference Hypothesis,” in , , , and (eds.) The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour. London: Macmillan, pp. 225–50Google Scholar
Plott, C. R. (1996) “Laboratory Experimental Testbeds: Application to the PCS Auction,” Social Science Working Paper 957. California Institute of Technology
(1997) “Laboratory Experimental Testbeds: Application to the PCS Auction,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6: 605–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plott, C. R. (1999) “Policy and the Use of Laboratory Experimental Methodology in Economics,” in (ed.) Uncertain Decisions: Bridging Theory and Experiments. Boston: Kluwer, pp. 293–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , eds. (in press) The Handbook of Experimental Economics Results. London: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
, , and (1982) “Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon: A Reexamination,” American Economic Review 72: 569–74Google Scholar
(1934) Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Springer; Engl. transl. Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson, 1959Google Scholar
(1957) “The Aim of Science,” Ratio 1: 24–35; reprinted in Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972Google Scholar
(1975) Philosophical Papers, Vol. 1: Mathematics, Matter and Method, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
(1982) “A Theory of Anticipated Utility,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 323–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. O. (1953) “Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” in From A Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 20–46
(1993) “Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics,” American Economic Review 83: 1281–302Google Scholar
(2002) “A Perspective on Psychology and Economics,” European Economic Review 46: 657–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology. Albany: SUNY PressGoogle Scholar
(2002) “How Concepts Both Structure the World and Abstract from It,” Review of Metaphysics 55: 581–613Google Scholar
(in press) “Monetary Incentives, What Are They Good for?,” Journal of Economic MethodologyGoogle Scholar
(1980) “A Bayesian Reconstruction of the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 11: 341–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982) “Preference Reversal: Further Evidence and Some Suggested Modifications in Experimental Design,” American Economic Review 72: 576–84Google Scholar
Rice, D. B. and V. L. Smith (1964) “Nature, the Experimental Laboratory, and the Credibility of Hypotheses,” Behavioral Science; reprinted in , Papers in Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991Google Scholar
(1992) Economics: Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns?Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
(1996) “A Field Guide to Recent Species of Naturalism,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47: 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986) “Laboratory Experimentation in Economics,” Economics and Philosophy 2: 245–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988) “Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: A Methodological Overview,” Economic Journal 98: 974–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) “Game Theory as a Part of Empirical Economics,” Economic Journal 101: 107–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. E. (1995) “Introduction to Experimental Economics,” in and (eds.) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–109Google Scholar
(2001) “Form and Function in Experimental Design,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 427–8Google Scholar
(2002) “The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design Economics,” Econometrica 70: 1341–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1979) “Game-Theoretic Models and the Role of Information in Bargaining,” Psychological Review 86: 574–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1999) “The Redesign of the Matching Market for American Physicians: Some Engineering Aspects of Economic Design,” American Economic Review 89: 748–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2001) “A Theorist's View of Experiments,” European Economic Review 45: 615–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (1990a) “Preference Reversals and Non-expected Utility,” American Economic Review 80: 922–30Google Scholar
, , and (1990b) “The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Mechanism and Non-expected Utility: A Testable Approach,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3: 177–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) “On the Lakatosian Apple of Discord in the History and Methodology of Economics,” Finnish Economic Papers 7: 30–41Google Scholar
Salmon, P. (1998) “Free Riding as a Mechanism,” in , , , and (eds.) Economics and Methodology: Crossing Boundaries. London: MacMillan, pp. 62–87Google Scholar
(1984) Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Salmon, W. C. (1988) “Rational Prediction,” in and (eds.) The Limitations of Deductivism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 47–60Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C. (1990) “Rationality and Objectivity in Science, or Tom Kuhn Meets Tom Bayes,” in (ed.) Scientific Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 14. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 175–204Google Scholar
, , and (1997) “Underdetermination in Economics. The Duhem-Quine Thesis,” Economics and Philosophy 13: 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schotter, A. (1998) “A Practical Person's Guide to Mechanism Selection: Some Lessons from Experimental Economics,” in (ed.) Organization with Incomplete Information. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988) “Does the Preference Reversals Phenomenon Necessarily Contradict the Independence Axiom?,” American Economic Review 28: 175–202Google Scholar
(2000) “Experimental Economics Under the Microscope,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 24: 267–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1962) “An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior,” Journal of Political Economy 70: 111–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1976) “Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory,” American Economic Review 66: 274–7Google Scholar
(1982) “Microeconomic Systems as an Experimental Science,” American Economic Review 72: 923–55Google Scholar
(1989) “Theory, Experiment and Economics,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3: 151–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991a) Papers in Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991b) “Rational Choice: The Contrast Between Economics and Psychology,” Journal of Political Economy 99: 877–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V. L. (1992) “Game Theory and Experimental Economics: Beginnings and Early Influences,” in (ed.) Towards A History of Game Theory. History of Political Economy Supplement, Vol. 24. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 241–82Google Scholar
(1994) “Economics in the Laboratory,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 113–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) “Method in Experiment: Rhetoric and Reality,” Experimental Economics 5: 91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(in press) “Experimental Methods in (Neuro)Economics,” in Encyclopedia of Cognitive ScienceGoogle Scholar
and (1993) “Monetary Rewards and Decision Costs in Experimental Economics,” Economic Inquiry 31: 245–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988) Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Sober, E. (2002) “Bayesianism – Its Scope and Limits,” in (ed.) Bayes' Theorem. Proceedings of the British Academy Press, Vol. 113: 21–38Google Scholar
(in press) “The Duhem-Quine Thesis and Experimental Economics: A Reinterpretation,” Journal of Economic MethodologyGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Experiments in Economics … (Should We Trust the Dismal Scientists in White Coats?),” Journal of Economic Methodology 6: 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1991) “Does the Random-Lottery Incentive System Elicit True Preferences? An Experimental Investigation,” American Economic Review 81: 971–8Google Scholar
, , and (1996) “In Vivo Interpretation of In Vitro Effect Studies,” Acta Biotheoretica 44: 1–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1984) “Reciprocity: The Supply of Public Goods through Voluntary Contributions,” Economic Journal 94: 772–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) “Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical Models in Economics,” Journal of Economic Methodology 7: 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(in press) “Experiments as Exhibits and Experiments as Tests,” Journal of Economic MethodologyGoogle Scholar
, ed. (1977) The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
(1989) The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism. Urbana: University of Illinois PressGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Incentives and Preference Reversals: Escape Moves and Community Decisions,” Journal of Economic Methodology 6: 351–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1988) “Anomalies: The Winner's Curse,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2: 191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1990) “Anomalies: Preference Reversals,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 4: 201–11Google Scholar
(1970) The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: Allen & UnwinGoogle Scholar
, , and (1990) “The Causes of Preference Reversals,” American Economic Review 80: 204–17Google Scholar
(2001) “Self-Interest as Self-Fulfilling Prophecy,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 429–30Google Scholar
(1961) “Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders,” Journal of Finance 16: 8–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1944) The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
(1997) “Making More from Less: Strategic Demand Reduction in the FCC Spectrum Auctions,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6: 529–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibull, J. W. (2002) “Testing Game Theory,” SSE Discussion Paper 382, Stockholm School of Economics
Wilde, L. L. (1981) “On the Use of Laboratory Experiments in Economics,” in (ed.) Philosophy in Economics. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 137–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977) “A Bidding Model of Perfect Competition,” Review of Economic Studies 44: 511–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. (2002) “Experimentation, Causal Inference, and Instrumental Realism,” in (ed.) The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press, pp. 87–118Google Scholar
(2003) Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Worrall, J. (1978) “The Ways in which the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes Improves on Popper's Methodology,” in and (eds.) Progress and Rationality of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 45–70Google Scholar
Worrall, J. (1985) “Scientific Discovery and Theory-Confirmation,” in (ed.) Change and Progress in Modern Science. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 301–31Google Scholar
Worrall, J. (1989) “Why Both Popper and Watkins Fail to Solve the Problem of Induction,” in and (eds.) Freedom and Rationality: Essays in Honour of John Watkins. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 257–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrall, J. (1993) “Falsification, Rationality, and the Duhem Problem,” in , , , and (eds.) Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 329–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahar, E. (1976) “Why Did Einstein's Programme Supersede Lorentz's,” in (ed.) Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 211–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1983) “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Invention?,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34: 243–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar