Book contents
2 - Genre Criticism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Edited by
Summary
THE METHODOLOGY OF GENRE CRITICISM
Genre is a loan word from the French that means “kind” or “type.” The term is widely used with reference to human discourse; to inquire about the genre of verbal discourse, whether of a spoken utterance or written text, is to ask about the sort of discourse that it is. Utterances might be “commands,” “questions,” “poems,” or “stories,” just as texts might be “biographies,” “histories,” “letters,” or “newspaper articles.” When we identify verbal discourse using one of these labels, we imply that we know something about how that type of discourse works and that we have the competence to understand it to some degree. If we have this skill as interpreters of literature, scholars would say that we have generic or literary competence. Our objective in the present article is modestly to pursue generic competence as readers of the Bible and, more specifically, as readers of the Book of Exodus. The quest begins with a bit of historical reflection on form criticism, which is the theoretical forerunner of genre criticism.
The Origins and Nature of Form Criticism
It would be accurate to say that prior to the Enlightenment (c. eighteenth cent.), the Bible's genre was foremost understood as “divine word.” By this I do not mean to say that pre-Enlightenment scholars failed to notice that different types of literature were in the Bible; I mean instead that, whatever these other genres were, they were considered secondary to the Bible's status as divine discourse.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Methods for Exodus , pp. 55 - 94Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
The Ideology of Genre: A Comparative Study of Generic Instability. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
, ed. Folklore Genres. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1976.
, ed. Modern Genre Theory. Harlow: Longman, 2000.
, ed. From an Antique Land: An Introduction to Ancient Near Eastern Literature. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.
“Compare and Contrast: The Contextual Approach to Biblical Literature.” In , , and , eds. The Bible in the Light of Cuneiform Literature. Scripture in Context 3. Lewiston, NY: Mellen, 1990: 1–30.Google Scholar
, ed. Old Testament Form Criticism. San Antonio, TX: Trinity University Press, 1974.
How to Read the Bible: History, Prophecy, Literature – Why Modern Readers Need to Know the Difference, and What It Means for Faith Today. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. Oral World and Written Word: Ancient Israelite Literature. Library of Ancient Israel. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1996.Google Scholar
, and , eds. The Changing Face of Form Criticism for the Twenty-First Century. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003.
“The Comparative Method in Biblical Interpretation-Principles and Problems.” In Congress Volume: Göttingen. VTSup 29. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1978: 320–56.Google Scholar
, ed. Genre in Mesopotamian Literature. Leiden: Brill, 2005.
, The Targums and Rabbinic Literature: An Introduction to Jewish Interpretation of Scripture (Cambridge: University Press, 1969), 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Biblical Exegesis in the Apostolic Period (2nd ed.; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999), 18–24Google Scholar
, “Alexandrian and Antiochene Exegesis,” in A History of Biblical Interpretation: The Ancient Period (Vol. 1; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003), 334–54Google Scholar
, History of Biblical Interpretation (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2004), 195–207, 218–248Google Scholar
, The Psalms: A Form-Critical Introduction (trans. ; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1967), 10Google Scholar
, Gattungstheorie: Information und Synthese (Uni-Taschenbücher 133; Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1963)Google Scholar
et al., “Genre,” The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics (ed. and ; Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), 456–59Google Scholar
and , eds., The Changing Face of Form Criticism for the Twenty-First Century (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003)
, “The Hermeneutical Function of Distanciation,” Philosophy Today 17 (1973): 129–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Comparative Method in Ancient Near Eastern and Biblical Legal Studies (AOAT 227; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1990)Google Scholar
, The Sacred & The Profane: The Nature of Religion (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1959), 37–41Google Scholar
, The Problem of the Process of Transmission in the Pentateuch (trans. ; JSOTSup 89; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1990)Google Scholar
, Die Komposition der Vätergeschichte (WMANT 57; Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1984)Google Scholar
, Reading the Fractures of Genesis: Historical and Literary Approaches (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1996)Google Scholar
, Erzväter und Exodus: Untersuchungen zur doppelten Begründung der Ursprünge Israels innerhalb der Geschichtsbücher des Alten Testaments (WMANT 81; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1999)Google Scholar
, Prologue to History: The Yahwist as Historian in Genesis (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1992)Google Scholar
, The Pentateuch: An Annotated Bibliography (IBR Bibliographies 1; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2002), 22–36Google Scholar
, “Reactivating the Chronicles Analogy in Pentateuchal Studies with Special Reference to the Sinai Pericope in Exodus,” ZAW 99 (1987): 16–37Google Scholar
, The History of the Old Testament Priesthood (AnBib 35; Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1969)Google Scholar
, Priests, Prophets, Diviners, Sages: A Socio-Historical Study of Religious Specialists in Ancient Israel (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press, 1995)Google Scholar
, “The Source Citations of Manasseh: King Manasseh in History and Homily,” VT 41 (1991): 450–61Google Scholar
and , The Pentateuch as Torah: New Models for Understanding Its Promulgation and Acceptance (Winona Lake, WI: Eisenbrauns, 2007)Google Scholar
, “The Exodus as Charter Myth,” in Religious Identity and the Invention of Tradition (ed. and ; Studies in Theology and Religion 3; Leiden: Brill, 2001), 128–43Google Scholar
, “Exodus: Liberation History against Chart Myth,” in Religious Identity and the Invention of Tradition (ed. and ; Studies in Theology and Religion 3; Leiden: Brill, 2001), 128–43Google Scholar
, “History-oriented Foundation Myths in Israel and its Environment,” in Religious Identity and the Invention of Tradition (ed. and ; Studies in Theology and Religion 3; Leiden: Brill, 2001), 169–90Google Scholar
, “The Vassal-Treaties of Esarhaddon and the Dating of Deuteronomy,” in 1940–1965 Oudtestamentlich Werkgezelschap in Nederland (OtSt 14; Leiden: Brill, 1965), 122–54Google Scholar
, Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972), 116–29Google Scholar
, The Aramaic Inscriptions of Sefîre (rev. ed., BibOr 19/A; Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico, 1995)Google Scholar
, Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor (2nd ed.; Writing from the Ancient World 6; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997), 70–142Google Scholar
, Studies in the Book of the Covenant in the Light of Cuneiform and Biblical Law (VTSup 18; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1970)Google Scholar
, Law and the Administration of Justice in the Old Testament and Ancient East (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1980)Google Scholar
, “The Laws of Hammurabi as a Source for the Covenant Collection (Exodus 20:23–23:19),” Maarav 10 (2003): 11–88Google Scholar
, A Law Book for the Diaspora: Revision in the Study of the Covenant Code (Oxford: University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
, Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
, “The Covenant Code and Near Eastern Legal Traditions: A Response to David P. Wright,” Maarav 13 (2006): 85–118Google Scholar
, Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor (2nd ed.; SBLWAW 6; Atlanta: Scholars, 1997), 4–7Google Scholar
, “Enūma Elish and Priestly Mimesis: Elite Emulation in Nascent Judaism,” JBL 126 (2007): 625–48Google Scholar
and , “The Induction of the Cult Image in Ancient Mesopotamia: The Mesopotamian mīs pî Ritual,” in Born in Heaven, Made on Earth (ed. ; Winona Lake, WI: Eisenbrauns, 1999), 55–121Google Scholar
, Egyptianization and Elite Emulation in Ramesside Palestine: Governance and Accommodation on the Imperial Periphery (Culture and History of the Ancient Near East; Leiden: Brill, 2000)Google Scholar
, Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses (New York: Routledge, 1993)Google Scholar
, Genealogy and History in the Biblical World (YNER 7; New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press, 1977)Google Scholar
, “Genesis 49 and the Tribal List Tradition in Ancient Israel,” ZAW 115 (2003): 327–47Google Scholar
, The Archaeology of the Israelite Settlement (Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1988)Google Scholar
, The Sargon Legend: A Study of the Akkadian Text and the Tale of the Hero Who Was Exposed at Birth (ASOR Dissertation Series 4; Cambridge, Mass.: ASOR, 1980)Google Scholar
, Understanding Exodus (New York: Behrman House for the Melton Research Center of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1969), 39Google Scholar
, “Mose und das Gesetz: Die Mose-Figur als Gegenentwurf politischer Theologie zur neuassyrischen Königsideologie im 7. Jh v. Chr,” in Mose: Agypten und das Alte Testament (ed. ; SBS 189; Stuttgart: BKW, 2000), 43–83Google Scholar
's standard folkore manual, Motif-Index of Folk-Literature (Bloomington: Indiana University, 1955)Google Scholar
, “The Covenant at Mount Sinai in Light of Texts from Mari,” in Sefer Moshe: The Moshe Weinfeld Jubilee Volume (ed. , , and ; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2004), 119–34Google Scholar
, The Cosmic Mountain in Canaan and the Old Testament (HSM 4; Cambridge: Harvard, 1972)Google Scholar
, Theophanie: Die Geschichte einer alttestamentlischen Gattung (WMANT 10; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchen Verlag, 1965)Google Scholar
, The Dethronement of Sabaoth: Studies in Shem and Kabod Theologies (ConBOT 18; Lund: Gleerup, 1982), 19–37Google Scholar
, God on the Mountain: A Study of Redaction, Theology and Canon in Exodus 19–24 (Atlanta: Scholars, 1989)Google Scholar
and , Neo-Assyrian Treaties and Loyalty Oaths (SAA 2; Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
, “The Decalogue: Its Significance, Uniqueness, and Place in Israel's Tradition,” in Religion and Law: Biblical-Judaic and Islam Perspectives (ed. ; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1990), 3–47Google Scholar
and , The Ten Commandments in Recent Research (SBT2 2; London: SCM Press, 1967), 22–35Google Scholar
, The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts (Oxford: University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “Kennt das Alte Testament einen Unterschied von ‘Gebot’ und ‘Gesetz’ Zur bibeltheolgischen Einstufung des Dekalogs,” JBTh 4 (1989): 63–89Google Scholar
, The Torah: Theology and Social History of Old Testament Law (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1996), 351–61Google Scholar
, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Amos and Hosea (New York: Scribners, 1905), 250Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 3
- Cited by