Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T19:07:58.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Genre Criticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Kenton L. Sparks
Affiliation:
Professor of Biblical Studies, Eastern University
Thomas B. Dozeman
Affiliation:
United Theological Seminary, Ohio
Get access

Summary

THE METHODOLOGY OF GENRE CRITICISM

Genre is a loan word from the French that means “kind” or “type.” The term is widely used with reference to human discourse; to inquire about the genre of verbal discourse, whether of a spoken utterance or written text, is to ask about the sort of discourse that it is. Utterances might be “commands,” “questions,” “poems,” or “stories,” just as texts might be “biographies,” “histories,” “letters,” or “newspaper articles.” When we identify verbal discourse using one of these labels, we imply that we know something about how that type of discourse works and that we have the competence to understand it to some degree. If we have this skill as interpreters of literature, scholars would say that we have generic or literary competence. Our objective in the present article is modestly to pursue generic competence as readers of the Bible and, more specifically, as readers of the Book of Exodus. The quest begins with a bit of historical reflection on form criticism, which is the theoretical forerunner of genre criticism.

The Origins and Nature of Form Criticism

It would be accurate to say that prior to the Enlightenment (c. eighteenth cent.), the Bible's genre was foremost understood as “divine word.” By this I do not mean to say that pre-Enlightenment scholars failed to notice that different types of literature were in the Bible; I mean instead that, whatever these other genres were, they were considered secondary to the Bible's status as divine discourse.

Type
Chapter
Information
Methods for Exodus , pp. 55 - 94
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beebee, T. O.The Ideology of Genre: A Comparative Study of Generic Instability. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Ben-Amos, Dan, ed. Folklore Genres. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1976.
Duff, David, ed. Modern Genre Theory. Harlow: Longman, 2000.
Ehrlich, Carl, ed. From an Antique Land: An Introduction to Ancient Near Eastern Literature. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008.
Hallo, W. W. “Compare and Contrast: The Contextual Approach to Biblical Literature.” In Hallo, W. W., Jones, B. W., and Mattingly, G. L., eds. The Bible in the Light of Cuneiform Literature. Scripture in Context 3. Lewiston, NY: Mellen, 1990: 1–30.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. H., ed. Old Testament Form Criticism. San Antonio, TX: Trinity University Press, 1974.
McKenzie, Steven L.How to Read the Bible: History, Prophecy, Literature – Why Modern Readers Need to Know the Difference, and What It Means for Faith Today. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niditch, Susan. Oral World and Written Word: Ancient Israelite Literature. Library of Ancient Israel. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1996.Google Scholar
Rosmarin, Adena. The Power of Genre. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Sparks, Kenton L.Ancient Texts for the Study of the Hebrew Bible. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2005.Google Scholar
Sweeney, M. A., and Zvi, E. Ben, eds. The Changing Face of Form Criticism for the Twenty-First Century. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003.
Talmon, Sh. “The Comparative Method in Biblical Interpretation-Principles and Problems.” In Congress Volume: Göttingen. VTSup 29. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1978: 320–56.Google Scholar
Todorov, Tzvetan. Genres in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Vanstiphout, H. L. J., ed. Genre in Mesopotamian Literature. Leiden: Brill, 2005.
Bowker, J., The Targums and Rabbinic Literature: An Introduction to Jewish Interpretation of Scripture (Cambridge: University Press, 1969), 315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longenecker, Richard N., Biblical Exegesis in the Apostolic Period (2nd ed.; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999), 18–24Google Scholar
Young, Frances, “Alexandrian and Antiochene Exegesis,” in A History of Biblical Interpretation: The Ancient Period (Vol. 1; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003), 334–54Google Scholar
Frei, Hans W., The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative (New Haven: Yale, 1974), 1–50Google Scholar
Yarchin, William, History of Biblical Interpretation (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2004), 195–207, 218–248Google Scholar
Gunkel, Hermann, The Psalms: A Form-Critical Introduction (trans. Horner, Th. M.; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1967), 10Google Scholar
Gunkel, Hermann, The Legends of Genesis (trans. Albright, W. F.; New York: Schocken, 1964), 34–35Google Scholar
Muilenburg, James, “Form Criticism and Beyond,” JBL 88 (1969): 1–18Google Scholar
Hempfer, K. W., Gattungstheorie: Information und Synthese (Uni-Taschenbücher 133; Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1963)Google Scholar
Garber, Frederick et al., “Genre,” The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics (ed. Preminger, A. and Brogan, T. V. F.; Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993), 456–59Google Scholar
Sweeney, Marvin A. and Zvi, Ehud Ben, eds., The Changing Face of Form Criticism for the Twenty-First Century (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2003)
Ricouer, Paul, “The Hermeneutical Function of Distanciation,” Philosophy Today 17 (1973): 129–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, Kenton L., Ancient Texts for the Study of the Hebrew Bible (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2005)Google Scholar
Malul, Meir, Comparative Method in Ancient Near Eastern and Biblical Legal Studies (AOAT 227; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1990)Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea, The Sacred & The Profane: The Nature of Religion (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1959), 37–41Google Scholar
Gressmann, Hugo, Mose und seine Zeit (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1913)Google Scholar
Rendtorff, Rolf, The Problem of the Process of Transmission in the Pentateuch (trans. Scullion, J. J.; JSOTSup 89; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Blum, Erhard, Die Komposition der Vätergeschichte (WMANT 57; Neukirchen: Neukirchener Verlag, 1984)Google Scholar
Carr, David M., Reading the Fractures of Genesis: Historical and Literary Approaches (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1996)Google Scholar
Schmid, Konrad, Erzväter und Exodus: Untersuchungen zur doppelten Begründung der Ursprünge Israels innerhalb der Geschichtsbücher des Alten Testaments (WMANT 81; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1999)Google Scholar
Rad, Gerhard, The Problem of the Hexateuch and Other Essays (Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1965)Google Scholar
Seters, John, Prologue to History: The Yahwist as Historian in Genesis (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1992)Google Scholar
Sparks, Kenton L., The Pentateuch: An Annotated Bibliography (IBR Bibliographies 1; Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2002), 22–36Google Scholar
Johnstone, W., “Reactivating the Chronicles Analogy in Pentateuchal Studies with Special Reference to the Sinai Pericope in Exodus,” ZAW 99 (1987): 16–37Google Scholar
Cody, Aelred, The History of the Old Testament Priesthood (AnBib 35; Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1969)Google Scholar
Grabbe, Lester L., Priests, Prophets, Diviners, Sages: A Socio-Historical Study of Religious Specialists in Ancient Israel (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Schniedewind, William, “The Source Citations of Manasseh: King Manasseh in History and Homily,” VT 41 (1991): 450–61Google Scholar
Knoppers, Gary N. and Levinson, Bernard M., The Pentateuch as Torah: New Models for Understanding Its Promulgation and Acceptance (Winona Lake, WI: Eisenbrauns, 2007)Google Scholar
Toorn, Karel, “The Exodus as Charter Myth,” in Religious Identity and the Invention of Tradition (ed. Henten, J. W. and Houtepen, A.; Studies in Theology and Religion 3; Leiden: Brill, 2001), 128–43Google Scholar
Albertz, Rainer, “Exodus: Liberation History against Chart Myth,” in Religious Identity and the Invention of Tradition (ed. Henten, J. W. and Houtepen, A.; Studies in Theology and Religion 3; Leiden: Brill, 2001), 128–43Google Scholar
Malinowski, B., Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays (Boston: Beacon, 1948), 120Google Scholar
Müller, Hans-Peter, “History-oriented Foundation Myths in Israel and its Environment,” in Religious Identity and the Invention of Tradition (ed. Henten, J. W. and Houtepen, A.; Studies in Theology and Religion 3; Leiden: Brill, 2001), 169–90Google Scholar
Mendenhall, G. E., “Ancient Oriental and Biblical Law,” BA 17 (1954): 26–46Google Scholar
McCarthy, Dennis J., Treaty and Covenant (2nd ed.; AnBib 21a. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1978)Google Scholar
Frankena, R., “The Vassal-Treaties of Esarhaddon and the Dating of Deuteronomy,” in 1940–1965 Oudtestamentlich Werkgezelschap in Nederland (OtSt 14; Leiden: Brill, 1965), 122–54Google Scholar
Weinfeld, Moshe, Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972), 116–29Google Scholar
Propp, William H. C., Exodus (AB; 2 vols.; Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1999–2006), 2.34–35Google Scholar
Fitzmeyer, Joseph A., The Aramaic Inscriptions of Sefîre (rev. ed., BibOr 19/A; Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico, 1995)Google Scholar
Roth, Martha T., Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor (2nd ed.; Writing from the Ancient World 6; Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1997), 70–142Google Scholar
Paul, Shalom M., Studies in the Book of the Covenant in the Light of Cuneiform and Biblical Law (VTSup 18; Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1970)Google Scholar
Boecker, Hans J., Law and the Administration of Justice in the Old Testament and Ancient East (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1980)Google Scholar
Wright, David P., “The Laws of Hammurabi as a Source for the Covenant Collection (Exodus 20:23–23:19),” Maarav 10 (2003): 11–88Google Scholar
Seters, John, A Law Book for the Diaspora: Revision in the Study of the Covenant Code (Oxford: University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Levinson, Bernard M., Deuteronomy and the Hermeneutics of Legal Innovation (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Wells, Bruce, “The Covenant Code and Near Eastern Legal Traditions: A Response to David P. Wright,” Maarav 13 (2006): 85–118Google Scholar
Roth, Martha T., Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor (2nd ed.; SBLWAW 6; Atlanta: Scholars, 1997), 4–7Google Scholar
Hurowitz, Victor A., “The Priestly Account of the Building of the Tabernacle,” BASOR 105 (1985): 21–30Google Scholar
Sparks, Kenton L., “Enūma Elish and Priestly Mimesis: Elite Emulation in Nascent Judaism,” JBL 126 (2007): 625–48Google Scholar
Walker, C. and Dick, Michael B., “The Induction of the Cult Image in Ancient Mesopotamia: The Mesopotamian mīs pî Ritual,” in Born in Heaven, Made on Earth (ed. Dick, M. B.; Winona Lake, WI: Eisenbrauns, 1999), 55–121Google Scholar
George, A. R., Babylonian Topographical Texts (OLA 40; Leuven: Peeters, 1992)Google Scholar
Higginbotham, Carolyn R., Egyptianization and Elite Emulation in Ramesside Palestine: Governance and Accommodation on the Imperial Periphery (Culture and History of the Ancient Near East; Leiden: Brill, 2000)Google Scholar
Taussig, Michael T., Mimesis and Alterity: A Particular History of the Senses (New York: Routledge, 1993)Google Scholar
Fleming, Daniel E., “Mari's Large Public Tent and the Priestly Sanctuary,” VT 50 (2000): 484–98Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert R., Genealogy and History in the Biblical World (YNER 7; New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Sparks, Kenton L., “Genesis 49 and the Tribal List Tradition in Ancient Israel,” ZAW 115 (2003): 327–47Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Israel, The Archaeology of the Israelite Settlement (Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1988)Google Scholar
Lewis, Brian, The Sargon Legend: A Study of the Akkadian Text and the Tale of the Hero Who Was Exposed at Birth (ASOR Dissertation Series 4; Cambridge, Mass.: ASOR, 1980)Google Scholar
Greenberg, Moshe, Understanding Exodus (New York: Behrman House for the Melton Research Center of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1969), 39Google Scholar
Otto, Eckhart, “Mose und das Gesetz: Die Mose-Figur als Gegenentwurf politischer Theologie zur neuassyrischen Königsideologie im 7. Jh v. Chr,” in Mose: Agypten und das Alte Testament (ed. Otto, E.; SBS 189; Stuttgart: BKW, 2000), 43–83Google Scholar
Childs, Brevard S., “The Birth of Moses,” JBL 84 (1965): 109–22Google Scholar
Thompson, Stith's standard folkore manual, Motif-Index of Folk-Literature (Bloomington: Indiana University, 1955)Google Scholar
Alter, Robert, The Art of Biblical Narrative (New York: Basic, 1982), 47–62Google Scholar
Martin, Michael W., “Betrothal Journey Narratives,” CBQ 70 (2008): 505–23Google Scholar
Polak, Frank H., “The Covenant at Mount Sinai in Light of Texts from Mari,” in Sefer Moshe: The Moshe Weinfeld Jubilee Volume (ed. Cohen, Ch., Hurvitz, A., and Paul, Sh. M.; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2004), 119–34Google Scholar
Clifford, R. J., The Cosmic Mountain in Canaan and the Old Testament (HSM 4; Cambridge: Harvard, 1972)Google Scholar
Jeremias, Jorg, Theophanie: Die Geschichte einer alttestamentlischen Gattung (WMANT 10; Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchen Verlag, 1965)Google Scholar
Mettinger, T. N. D., The Dethronement of Sabaoth: Studies in Shem and Kabod Theologies (ConBOT 18; Lund: Gleerup, 1982), 19–37Google Scholar
Görg, M., “Die Gattung des sogenannten Tempelweihspruches (1 Kg 8, 12f.),” UF 6 (1974): 55–63Google Scholar
Dozeman, Thomas B., God on the Mountain: A Study of Redaction, Theology and Canon in Exodus 19–24 (Atlanta: Scholars, 1989)Google Scholar
Parpola, Simo and Watanabe, K., Neo-Assyrian Treaties and Loyalty Oaths (SAA 2; Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Weinfeld, Moshe, “The Decalogue: Its Significance, Uniqueness, and Place in Israel's Tradition,” in Religion and Law: Biblical-Judaic and Islam Perspectives (ed. Firmage, E. B.; Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1990), 3–47Google Scholar
Tappy, Ron E., “The Code of Kinship in the Ten Commandments,” RB 107 (2000): 321–27Google Scholar
Kratz, R. G., “Der Dekalog im Exodusbuch,” VT 44 (1994): 205–38Google Scholar
Stamm, Johann J. and Andrew, Maurice E., The Ten Commandments in Recent Research (SBT2 2; London: SCM Press, 1967), 22–35Google Scholar
Smith, Mark S., The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts (Oxford: University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norbert, Lohfink, “Kennt das Alte Testament einen Unterschied von ‘Gebot’ und ‘Gesetz’ Zur bibeltheolgischen Einstufung des Dekalogs,” JBTh 4 (1989): 63–89Google Scholar
Crüsemann, Frank, The Torah: Theology and Social History of Old Testament Law (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1996), 351–61Google Scholar
Sarna, Nahum, Exodus (JPS Torah Commentary; Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1991), 109Google Scholar
Harper, William Rainey, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Amos and Hosea (New York: Scribners, 1905), 250Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×