Is verb agreement the same crossmodally?

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511486777.018

14 - Is verb agreement the same crossmodally?

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Christian Rathmann and

Edited by

Kearsy Cormier and

Christian Rathmann: Affiliation:
Doctoral student in linguistics University of Texas at Austin
Gaurav Mathur: Affiliation:
Postdoctoral fellow Haskins Laboratories in New Haven, CT
Richard P. Meier: Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Kearsy Cormier: Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
David Quinto-Pozos: Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

One major question in linguistics is whether the universals among spoken languages are the same as those among signed languages. Two types of universals have been distinguished: formal universals, which impose abstract conditions on all languages, and substantive universals, which fix the choices that a language makes for a particular aspect of grammar (Chomsky 1965; Greenberg 1966; Comrie 1981). It would be intriguing to see if there are modality differences in both types of universals. Fischer (1974) has suggested that formal universals like some syntactic operations apply in both modalities, while some substantive universals are modality specific. Similarly, Newport and Supalla (2000:112) have noted that signed and spoken languages may have some different universals due to the different modalities.

In this chapter we focus on verb agreement as it provides a window into some of the universals within and across the two modalities. We start with a working definition of agreement for spoken languages and illustrate the difficulty in applying such a definition to signed languages. We then embark on two goals: to investigate the linguistic status of verb agreement in signed language and to understand the architecture of grammar with respect to verb agreement. We explore possible modality differences and consider their effects on the nature of the morphological processes involved in verb agreement. Finally, we return to the formal and substantive universals that separate and/or group spoken and signed languages.

Type: Chapter
Information: Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages , pp. 370 - 404

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486777.018 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahlgren, Ingrid. 1990. Deictic pronouns in Swedish and Swedish Sign Language. In Theoretical issues in sign language research, Vol. 1: Linguistics, ed. Susan Fischer and Patricia Siple, 167–174. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press

Allan, Keith. 1977. Classifiers. Language 53:285–311CrossRef Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, and Wendy Sandler. 2000. Universal and particular aspects of sign language morphology. Manuscript, State University of New York at Stony Brook and University of Haifa

Aubry, Luce. 2000. Vertical manipulation of the manual and visual indices in the person reference system of American Sign Language. Masters thesis, Harvard University

Bahan, Benjamin. 1996. Non-manual realization of agreement in American Sign Language. Ph. D. dissertation, Boston University

Baker, Mark. 1996. The polysynthesis parameter. New York: Oxford University Press

Baker-Shenk, Charlotte and Dennis Cokely. 1980. American Sign Language: A teacher's resource text on grammar and culture. Silver Spring, MD: T. J. Publishers

Bobaljik, Jonathan and Susanne Wurmbrand. 1997. Preliminary notes on agreement in Itelmen. In PF: Papers at the Interface, ed. Benjamin Bruening, Yoon-Jung Kang and Martha McGinnis, 395–423. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 30

Bos, Heleen. 1994. An auxiliary verb in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Perspectives on Sign Language Structure: Papers from the 5thInternational Symposium on Sign Language Research, Vol. 1, ed. Inger Ahlgren, Brita Bergman and Mary Brennan, 37–53. Durham: ISLA

Brentari, Diane. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Broselow, Ellen and John, McCarthy. 1983. A theory of internal reduplication. The Linguistic Review 3:25–88CrossRef Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. Oxford: Blackwell

Comrie, Bernard. 1982. Grammatical relations in Huidrol. In Syntax and semantics, Vol. 15: Studies in transitivity, ed. Paul J. Hopper and Sandra A. Thompson, 95–115. New York: Academic Press

Cormier, Kearsy. 1998. How does modality contribute to linguistic diversity? Manuscript, The University of Texas at Austin

Cormier, Kearsy. 2002. Grammaticization of indexic signs: How American Sign Language expresses numerosity. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin

Cormier, Kearsy, Steven Wechsler and Richard P. Meier. 1998. Locus agreement in American Sign Language. In Lexical and constructional aspects of linguistic explanation, ed. Gert Webelhuth, Jean-Pierre Koenig and Andreas Kathol, 215–229. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications

Duncan, Sandra. 2001. Perspectives on the co-expressivity of speech and co-speech gestures in three languages. Paper presented at the 27th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society

Ehrlenkamp, Sonja. 1999. Possessivkonstruktionen in der Deutschen Gebärdensprache: Warum die Gebärde ‘SCH’ kein Verb ist?Das Zeichen 48:274–279Google Scholar

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1985. Mental spaces: aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Fiengo, Robert and Robert May. 1994. Indices and identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Fischer, Susan. 1973. Two processes of reduplication in the American Sign Language. Foundations of language 9:469–480Google Scholar

Fischer, Susan. 1974. Sign language and linguistic universals. In Actes de Colloque Franco-Allemand de Grammaire Transformationelle, ed. Christian Rohrer and Nicholas Ruwet, 187–204. Tübingen: Niemeyer

Fischer, Susan. 1978. Sign language and creoles. In Understanding language through sign language research, ed. Patricia Siple, 309–331. New York: Academic Press

Fischer, Susan. 1996. The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language. Lingua 98:103–120CrossRef Google Scholar

Fischer, Susan and Bonnie, Gough. 1978. Verbs in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 18:17–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Fourestier, Simone. 1998. Verben der Bewegung und Position in der Katalanischen Gebärdensprache. Magisterarbeit, Universität Hamburg

Friedman, Lynn. 1975. Space, time, and person reference in ASL. Language 51:940–961CrossRef Google Scholar

Friedman, Lynn. 1976. The manifestation of subject, object and topic in the American Sign Language. In Subject and topic, ed. Charles Li, 125–148. New York: Academic Press

Gee, James and Wendy Goodhart. 1988. American Sign Language and the human biological capacity for language. In Language, learning and deafness, ed. Michael Strong, 49–74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Gee, James and Judy, Kegl. 1982. Semantic perspicuity and the locative hypothesis: implications for acquisition. Journal of Education 164:185–209CrossRef Google Scholar

Gee, James and Judy, Kegl. 1983. Narrative/story structure, pausing and American Sign Language. Discourse Processes 6:243–258Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph. 1966. Universals of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Grinevald, Colette. 1999. A typology of nominal classification systems. Faits de Langues, 1999, 14:101–122CrossRef Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray. 1987. Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Jackendoff, Ray. 1992. Languages of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Janis, Wynne. 1992. Morphosyntax of the ASL verb phrase. Doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo

Johnston, Trevor. 1991. Spatial syntax and spatial semantics in the inflection of signs for the marking of person and location in Auslan. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 2:29–62Google Scholar

Johnston, Trevor. 1996. Function and medium in the forms of linguistic expression found in a sign language. In International Review of Sign Linguistics, Vol. 1, ed. William Edmondson and Ronnie B. Wilbur, 57–94. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Keller, Jörge. 1998. Aspekte der Raumnutzung in der deutschen Gebärdensprache. Hamburg: Signum Press

Kendon, Adam. 2000. Language and gesture: unity or duality? In Language and gesture, ed. David McNeill, 47–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Kita, Sotaro. 2000. How representation gestures help speaking. In Language and gesture, ed. David McNeill, 162–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Klima, Edward and Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press

Lacy, Richard. 1974. Putting some of the syntax back into the semantics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New York

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

Lehmann, Christian. 1988. On the function of agreement. In Agreement in natural language: approaches, theories, descriptions, ed. Michael Barlow and Charles Ferguson, 55–65. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications

Liddell, Scott. 1990. Four functions of a locus: re-examining the structure of space in ASL. In Sign language research: theoretical issues, ed. C. Lucas, 176–198. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press

Liddell, Scott. 1995. Real, surrogate, and token space: grammatical consequences in ASL. In Language, gesture, and space, ed. Karen Emmorey and Judy Reilly, 19–42. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Liddell, Scott. 2000a. Indicating verbs and pronouns: pointing away from agreement. In The signs of language revisited: an anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, ed. Karen Emmorey and Harlan Lane, 303–320. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Liddell, Scott. 2000b. Blended spaces and deixis in sign language discourse. In Language and gesture, ed. David McNeill, 331–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Liddell, Scott and Robert, Johnson. 1989. American Sign Language: the phonological base. Sign Language Studies 18, 195–277CrossRef Google Scholar

Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1991. Universal grammar and American Sign Language: setting the null argument parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic

Lillo-Martin, Diane and Edward Klima. 1990. Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Theoretical issues in sign language research, Vol. 1: Linguistics, ed. Susan Fischer and Patricia Siple, 191–210. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

Lindblom, Björn. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory. In Speech production and speech modeling, ed. William Hardcastle and Alain Marchal, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic

MacLaughlin, Dawn. 1997. The structure of determiner phrases: evidence from American Sign Language. Ph.D. dissertation, Boston University

Marantz, Alec. 1982. Re reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 435–482Google Scholar

Mathur, Gaurav. 2000. Verb agreement as alignment in signed languages. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Mathur, Gaurav and Christian Rathmann. 2001. Why not GIVE-US: an articulatory constraint in signed languages. In Signed languages: Discoveries from international research, ed. Valerie Dively, Melanie Metzger, Sarah Taub and Anne-Marie Baer, 1–26. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press

McCarthy, John. 1982. Prosodic templates, morphemic templates and morphemic tiers. In The structure of phonological representation, Part One, ed. Harry van der Hulst and Neil Smith, 191–223. Dordrecht: Foris

McNeill, David. 2000. Catchments and contexts: non-modular factors in speech and gesture production. In Language and gesture, ed. David McNeill, 312–328. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Meier, Richard P. 1982. Icons, analogues, and morphemes: the acquisition of verb agreement in American Sign Language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at San Diego, CA

Meier, Richard P. 1990. Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Theoretical issues in sign language research, Vol. 1: Linguistics, ed. Susan Fischer and Patricia Siple, 175–190. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press

Meier, Richard P. 2002. The acquisition of verb agreement: pointing out arguments for the linguistic status of agreement in signed languages. In Current developments in the study of signed language acquisition, ed. Gary Morgan and Bencie Woll. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Meir, Irit. 1995. Explaining backwards verbs in Israeli Sign Language: syntax-semantic interaction. In Sign language research, ed. Helen Bos and Gertrude Schermer, 105–120. Hamburg: Sigum

Meir, Irit. 1998. Thematic structure and verb agreement in Israeli Sign Language. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Haifa, Israel

Neidle, Carol, Dawn MacLaughlin, Judy Kegl, Benjamin Bahan and Debra Aarons. 1995. Overt realization of syntactic features in American Sign Language. Paper presented at Syntax Seminar, University of Trondheim, Norway

Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan, and Robert Lee. 2000. The syntax of American Sign Language: functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Newport, Elissa. 2000. Reduced input in the acquisition of signed languages: contributions to the study of creolization. In Language creation and language change, ed. Michel DeGraff, 161–178. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Newport, Elissa and Ted Supalla. 2000. Sign language research at the millennium. In The signs of language revisited, ed. Karen Emmorey and Harlan Lane, 103–114. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Padden, Carol. 1983. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego, CA

Padden, Carol 1990. The relation between space and grammar in ASL verb morphology. In Sign language research: theoretical issues, ed. Ceil Lucas, 118–132. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press

Petronio, Karen and Diane, Lillo-Martin. 1997. Wh-movement and the position of Spec, CP: evidence from American Sign Language. Language 73, 18–57CrossRef Google Scholar

Prillwitz, Siegmund. 1986. Die Gebärde der Gehörlosen. Ein Beitrag zur Deutschen Gebärdensprache und ihrer Grammatik. In Die Gebärde in Erziehung und Bildung Gehörloser, ed. Sigmund Prillwitz, 55–78. Tagungsbericht. Hamburg: Signum Verlag

Rathmann, Christian. 2001. The optionality of Agreement Phrase: evidence from signed languages. Unpublished manuscript, The University of Texas at Austin

Sandler, Wendy. 1986. The spreading hand autosegment of ASL. Sign Language Studies 15, 1–28CrossRef Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy. 1989. Phonological representation of the sign. Dordrecht: Foris

Sandler, Wendy. 1993. A sonority cycle in American Sign Language. Phonology 10, 243–279CrossRef Google Scholar

Schick, Brenda. 1990. Classifier predicates in American Sign Language. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1:15–40Google Scholar

Shepard-Kegl, Judy. 1985. Locative relations in American Sign Language word formation, syntax and discourse. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT

Singleton, Jenny and Elissa Newport. 1994. When learners surpass their models: the acquisition of American Sign Language from impoverished input. Manuscript, University of Rochester

Smith, Wayne. 1990. Evidence for auxiliaries in Taiwan Sign Language. In Theoretical issues in sign language research, Vol. 1: Linguistics, ed. Susan Fischer and Patricia Siple, 211–228. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press

Speas, Margaret. 1995. Economy, agreement, and the representation of null arguments. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Stokoe, William, Dorothy Casterline and Carl Croneberg. 1965. A dictionary of American Sign Language based on linguistic principles. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press

Supalla, Ted. 1986. The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Noun classes and categorization, ed. Colette Craig, 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Supalla, Ted. 1997. An implicational hierarchy in the verb agreement of American Sign Language. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester

Sutton-Spence, Rachel and Bencie Woll. 1999. The linguistics of British Sign Language: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, ed. T. Shopen, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Spatial structuring in spoken language and its relation to that in sign language. Paper presented at the Third Workshop on Text Structure, The University of Texas at Austin

Taub, Sarah. 2001. Language from the body: iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Hulst, Harry. 1993. Units in the analysis of signs. Phonology 10:209–241CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilcox, Phyllis. 2000. Metaphor in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press

Wood, Sandra. 1999. Syntactic and semantic aspects of negation in ASL. Masters thesis, Purdue University