Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and What They Tell Us About Controlled Attention, General Fluid Intelligence, and Functions of the Prefrontal Cortex

Randall W. Engle; Michael J. Kane; Stephen W. Tuholski

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139174909.007

- Aa
- Aa

Cited by 299
Cited by
- 299
Crossref Citations

This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

Jarrold, Christopher Hartley, Samantha J. Phillips, Caroline and Baddeley, Alan D. 2000. Word fluency in Williams syndrome: Evidence for unusual semantic organisation?. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, Vol. 5, Issue. 4, p. 293.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Oberauer, Klaus and Süß, Heinz-Martin 2000. Working memory and interference: A comment on Jenkins, Myerson, Hale, and Fry (1999). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 7, Issue. 4, p. 727.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Süß, Heinz-Martin and Schmiedek, Florian 2000. Ermüdungs- und Übungseffekte bei mehrstündiger kognitiver Beanspruchung. Experimental Psychology, Vol. 47, Issue. 3, p. 162.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Duncan, John 2001. An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 2, Issue. 11, p. 820.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Jong, Ritske De 2001. Adult age differences in goal activation and goal maintenance. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 13, Issue. 1-2, p. 71.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Tehan, Gerald Hendry, Liam and Kocinski, David 2001. Word length and phonological similarity effects in simple, complex, and delayed serial recall tasks: Implications for working memory. Memory, Vol. 9, Issue. 4-6, p. 333.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Miyake, Akira Friedman, Naomi P. Rettinger, David A. Shah, Priti and Hegarty, Mary 2001. How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 130, Issue. 4, p. 621.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Kail, Robert and Hall, Lynda K. 2001. Distinguishing short-term memory from working memory. Memory & Cognition, Vol. 29, Issue. 1, p. 1.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Tuholski, Stephen W. Engle, Randall W. and Baylis, Gordon C. 2001. Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration. Memory & Cognition, Vol. 29, Issue. 3, p. 484.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Miyake, Akira Witzki, Alexander H. and Emerson, Michael J. 2001. Field dependence–independence from a working memory perspective: A dual-task investigation of the Hidden Figures Test. Memory, Vol. 9, Issue. 4-6, p. 445.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Reuter-Lorenz, Patricia A. Marshuetz, Christy Jonides, John Smith, Edward E. Hartley, Alan and Koeppe, Robert 2001. Neurocognitive ageing of storage and executive processes. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 13, Issue. 1-2, p. 257.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Willis, Catherine S. and Gathercole, Susan E. 2001. Phonological short-term memory contributions to sentence processing in young children. Memory, Vol. 9, Issue. 4-6, p. 349.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Oberauer, Klaus and Kliegl, Reinhold 2001. Beyond resources: Formal models of complexity effects and age differences in working memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 13, Issue. 1-2, p. 187.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Simon, Jodie A. Keenan, Janice M. Pennington, Bruce F. Taylor, Annette K. and Hagerman, Randi J. 2001. Discourse Processing in Women with Fragile X Syndrome: Evidence for a Deficit Establishing Coherence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 1.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Hutton, Una M. Z. and Towse, John N. 2001. Short-term memory and working memory as indices of children's cognitive skills. Memory, Vol. 9, Issue. 4-6, p. 383.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Lustig, Cindy Hasher, Lynn and Tonev, Simon T. 2001. Inhibitory control over the present and the past. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 13, Issue. 1-2, p. 107.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Fiore, Stephen M. Salas, Eduardo and Bowers, Clint A. 2001. Attitudes, Behaviors, and Cognition in Distributed Teams: The Effect of Team Opacity on Process and Performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 45, Issue. 4, p. 382.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Kaakinen, Johanna K. Hyönä, Jukka and Keenan, Janice M. 2002. Perspective Effects on Online Text Processing. Discourse Processes, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 159.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Long, Debra L. and Prat, Chantel S. 2002. Working memory and Stroop interference: An individual differences investigation. Memory & Cognition, Vol. 30, Issue. 2, p. 294.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Elliott, Emily M. 2002. The irrelevant-speech effect and children: theoretical implications of developmental change. Memory & Cognition, Vol. 30, Issue. 3, p. 478.

CrossRef

Google Scholar

Download full list

Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this chapter

Scopus Citations

View all citations for this chapter on Scopus

Print publication year: 1999
Online publication date: June 2012

4 - Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and What They Tell Us About Controlled Attention, General Fluid Intelligence, and Functions of the Prefrontal Cortex

By Randall W. Engle, Georgia Institute of Technology, Michael J. Kane, Georgia Institute of Technology, Stephen W. Tuholski, University at Edwardsville

Edited by Akira Miyake, University of Colorado, Boulder, Priti Shah, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174909.007
pp 102-134

Export citation

Summary

FIVE CENTRAL FEATURES OF THE THEORY

Working memory is a system consisting of those long-term memory traces active above threshold, the procedures and skills necessary to achieve and maintain that activation, and limited-capacity, controlled attention. The specific features of our model include:

(1) Domain-free, limited-capacity controlled attention.

(2) Domain-specific codes and maintenance (phonological loop and visuospatial sketchpad are two examples but the potential number of such codes is large).

(3) Individual differences in both 1 and 2, but individual differences in capacity for controlled processing are general and possibly the mechanism for general fluid intelligence. Although people can, with practice and expertise, circumvent the abiding limitations of controlled attention in quite specific situations, the limitations reemerge in novel situations and even in the domain of expertise if the situation calls for controlled processing.

(4) Limited-capacity, controlled processing is required for maintaining temporary goals in the face of distraction and interference and for blocking, gating, and/or suppressing distracting events.

(5) The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) and associated structures mediate the controlled processing functions of working memory. We also argue that individual differences in controlled processing represent differences in functioning of the PFC.

A number of intellectual influences have served to shape our thinking about working memory (WM) and its evolution as a construct separate from that of short-term memory (STM).

Models of Working Memory

Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control

This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

4 - Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and What They Tell Us About Controlled Attention, General Fluid Intelligence, and Functions of the Prefrontal Cortex

Summary