Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T21:06:11.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genomic imprinting and intrauterine growth retardation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2010

P. T. Loughna
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, London
Get access

Summary

The role of genomic or gametic imprinting and its association with growth has become an exciting research area during the last 10 years. Studies in both man and mouse have implicated chromosomal regions and specific genes that are imprinted such that the expression of the same gene is different depending on its parental origin. When the normal imprinted pattern of genes in some of these regions is altered through deletions, uniparental disomy or localized mutations affecting specific gene expression, specific growth disorders are observed.

Intrauterine growth retardation

Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) is one of the three major causes of perinatal and childhood morbidity (Dobson, Abell & Beischer, 1981). Only prematurity and major malformations numerically outrank it. In many cases the aetiology is unknown, making management and prognosis difficult. IUGR can be divided broadly into three aetiological groups: cases associated with pre-eclampsia or vascular disorders; those found to have syndromes associated with chromosomal abnormalities; and a heterogeneous ‘idiopathic’ group.

The pattern of intrauterine growth that defines IUGR occurs when a fetus is observed to be small for gestational age (SGA) and growing slowly as defined by ultra-sound evidence. The post-natal characteristics have traditionally been a SGA baby with a fairly typical clinical appearance suggesting poor intrauterine nutrition. The prevalence of IUGR is difficult to assess and depends heavily on how the limits to the growth parameters are defined. It is defined generally by birthweight below the 10th percentile in accordance with the gestational age for infants born in the same community (Kitchen, 1968). However about 75% of these show catch-up growth during the first four years of life (Fancourt et al., 1976).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×