Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T14:52:57.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CHAPTER 4 - Co-Patenting Patterns in Nanotechnology

A Comparison of South Korea and Germany

from Part II - Winning and Losing in Nanotech: Case Studies from Developed Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

By
Ad Notten  and
Shyama V. Ramani
Edited by
Shyama V. Ramani
Shyama V. Ramani
Affiliation:
Universiteit Maastricht, Netherlands
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Nanotechnology and Development
What's in it for Emerging Countries?
 , pp. 93 - 114
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Audretsch, D. and Feldman, M.. 1996. “R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production.” American Economic Review, 86(3): 630–40.Google Scholar
Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., and Maskell, P.. 2004. “Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation.” Progress in Human Geography, 28(1): 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., and Freeman, L.C.. 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Boschma, R.A. and Lambooy, J.G.. 2002. “Knowledge, market structure, and economic coordination: Dynamics of industrial districts.” Growth and Change, 33(3): 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breschi, S. and Lissoni, F.. 2001. “Knowledge spillovers and local innovation systems: A critical survey.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4): 975–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breschi, S. and Malerba, F.. 2001. “Geography of innovation and economic clustering.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4): 817–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S-J. 2006. Financial Crisis and Transformation of Korean Business Groups: The Rise and Fall of Chaebols. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chung, J-Y. 2011. “The National Innovation System (NIS) and the automobile industry in South Korea.” Discussion papers in Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, No. 29. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.Google Scholar
Chung, S. 1999. “Korean innovation policies for small and medium-sized firms.” Science and Public Policy, 26(2): 70–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, P. 1994. “The creative milieu: A regional perspective on innovation.” In The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, edited by Dodgson, M. and Rothwell, R., 25–32. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Cooke, P. 2002. “Regional innovation systems: General findings and some new evidence from biotechnology clusters.” Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1): 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, R., Jonard, N., and Ozman, M.. 2004. “Knowledge dynamics in a network industry.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(5): 469–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Solla Price, D. 1963. Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolfsma, W. and van der Panne, G.. 2003. “The odd role of proximity in knowledge relations: High-tech in the Netherlands.” Journal of Economic and Social Geography, 94(4): 453–62.Google Scholar
Etzkowitz, H. and Leydesdorff, L.. 2000. “The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations.” Research Policy, 29(2): 109–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, C. 1987. Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Gertler, M. and Levitte, Y.. 2005. “Local nodes in global networks: The geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation.” Industry and Innovation, 12(4): 487–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M.. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1973. “The strength of weak ties.” American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360–80l.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grupp, H. 1998. Foundations of the Economics of Innovation: Theory, Measurement and Practice. Houndmills: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. 1989. “Real effects of academic research.” American Economic Review, 79(5): 957–70.Google Scholar
Jensen, J. and Greve, A.. 2002. “Does the degree of redundancy in social networks influence the success of business start-ups?” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 8(5): 254–67.Google Scholar
Jolly, D. and Ramani, S.V.. 1996. “Technology creation in the biotechnology sectors: The French connection.” International Journal of Technology Management, 12(7/8): 830–48.Google Scholar
Kim, L. 1997. Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Koske, I. and Wörgötter, A.. 2010. Germany’s Growth Potential, Structural Reforms and Global Imbalances, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 780. Paris: OECD Publishing. (URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kmd7827ddzn-en).Google Scholar
Leoncini, R., Maggioni, M., and Montresor, S.. 1996. “Intersectoral innovation flows and national technological systems: Network analysis for comparing Italy and Germany.” Research Policy, 25(3): 415–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundvall, B-A. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Malerba, F. and Orsenigo, L.. 1997. “Technological regimes and sectoral patterns of innovative activities.” Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1): 83–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R.L. and Sunley, P.J.. 2003. “Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea?” Journal of Economic Geography, 3(1): 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maskell, P. and Malmberg, A.. 1999. “Localized learning and industrial competitiveness.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(2): 167–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nachum, L. and Keeble, D.. 2003. “Neo-Marshallian clusters and global networks: The linkages of media firms in central London.” Long Range Planning, 36(5): 459–80.Google Scholar
Narin, F. 1995. “Patents as indicators for the evaluation of industrial research output.” Scientometrics, 34(3): 489–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R., ed. 1962. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijkamp, P. 1986. Technological Change, Employment and Spatial Dynamics. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2009. OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Korea 2009. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264067233-enGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2012. OECD STI Outlook 2011. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Porter, M. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W., Koput, K., Bowie, J., and Smith-Doerr, L.. 2002. “The spatial clustering of science and capital: Accounting for biotech firm-venture capital relationships.” Regional Studies, 36(3): 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rammer, C. 2011. Mini Country Report Germany: Thematic Report 2011 under Specific Contract for the Integration of INNO Policy Trend Chart with ERAWATCH (2011– 2012). Brussels: European Commission/ProInno Europe. (URL: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/countryreports/germany_en.pdf).Google Scholar
Reagans, R. and. Zuckerman, E.. 2008. “Why knowledge does not equal knowledge: The network redundancy trade-off.” Industry and Corporate Change, 17(5): 903–44.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. 1996. “Technology policy and the growth of regions: Evidence from four countries.” Small Business Economics, 8(2): 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ter Wal, A. 2008. “Kennisnetwerken.” Rooilijn, 41(6): 386–93.Google Scholar
Verspagen, B. and Schoenmakers, W.. 2004. “The spatial dimension of patenting by multinational firms in Europe.” Journal of Economic Geography, 4(1): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, S. and Faust, K.. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WIPO. 2007. Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property Rights and University-Industry Partnerships: The Experience of China, India, Japan, Philippines, the Republic of Korea, Singapore and Thailand. (URL: http://www.wipo.int/freepublications/en/intproperty/928/wipo_pub_928.pdf).Google Scholar
Wolfe, D. and Lucas, M.. 2005. Global Networks and Local Linkages: The Paradox of Cluster Development in an Open Economy. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Zucker, L. and Darby, M.. 1996. “Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(23): 709–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×