Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T14:14:38.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2010

Mark C. Murphy
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexy, Robert. 1998. “Law and Correctness.” In Freeman 1998, pp. 205–222
Alexy, Robert. 1999. “A Defense of Radbruch's Formula.” In Dyzenhaus 1999, pp. 16–39
Alston, William P. 1999. Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1993. Value in Ethics and Economics. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1969. “On Promising and Its Justice, and Whether It Needs to be Respected In Foro Interno.” Critica 3, pp. 61–83Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1981. Summa Theologiae, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Christian Classics. References given by part, question, and article number
Aristotle. 1998. Politics, trans. C. D. C. Reeve. Hackett. References given by Bekker numbers
Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Terence Irwin. Hackett. References given by Bekker numbers
Austin, John. 1995 [first published 1832]. Province of Jurisprudence Determined, ed. Rumble, Wilfrid. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1946 [first published 1936]. Language, Truth, and Logic, 2nd ed. DoverGoogle Scholar
Bedau, Mark. 1992a. “Where's the Good in Teleology?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52, pp. 781–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedau, Mark. 1992b. “Goal-Directed Systems and the Good.” Monist 75, pp. 34–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1996 [first published 1789]. Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Bix, Brian. 1993. Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bix, Brian. 1996. “Natural Law Theory.” In Patterson 1996, pp. 223–240
Bix, Brian. 1999. “Patrolling the Boundaries: Inclusive Legal Positivism and the Nature of Jurisprudential Debate.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12, pp. 17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bix, Brian. 2000. “On the Dividing Line Between Natural Law Theory and Legal Positivism.” Notre Dame Law Review 75, pp. 1613–1624Google Scholar
Bix, Brian. 2002. “Natural Law Theory: The Modern Tradition.” In Coleman and Shapiro 2002, pp. 61–103
Borchert, Donald, ed. Forthcoming. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd. edition. Macmillan
Chappell, Timothy. 2005. “The Polymorphy of Practical Reason.” In Oderberg and Chappell 2005, pp. 102–126
Christiano, Thomas. 1996. The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory. WestviewGoogle Scholar
Cochran, Clarke E. 1978. “Yves R. Simon and ‘the Common Good’: A Note on the Concept.” Ethics 88, pp. 229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules, and Brian Leiter. 1996. “Legal Positivism.” In Patterson 1996, pp. 241–260
Coleman, Jules, and Shapiro, Scott, eds. 2002. Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules. 1982. “Negative and Positive Positivism.” Journal of Legal Studies 11, pp. 139–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules, ed. 2001. Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper-Stephenson, Ken, and Gibson, Elaine, eds. 1993. Tort Theory. Captus PressGoogle Scholar
Dupré, Louis. 1993. “The Common Good and the Open Society.” Review of Politics 55, pp. 687–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977a. Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977b. “Hard Cases.” In Dworkin 1977a, pp. 81–130
Dworkin, Ronald. 1982. “‘Natural’ Law Revisited,” University of Florida Law Review 34, pp. 165–210Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2002. “Thirty Years On.” Harvard Law Review 115, pp. 1655–1687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ed. 1999. Recrafting the Rule of Law. Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, William. 1998. Three Anarchical Fallacies. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, William, ed. 1999a. The Duty to Obey the Law: Selected Philosophical Readings. Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, William. 1999b. “Introduction.” In Edmundson 1999a, pp. 1–15
Edmundson, William. 1999c. “Introduction: Some Recent Work on Political Obligation.” APA Newsletter on Law and Philosophy 99, pp. 62–67Google Scholar
Edmundson, William. 2004. “State of the Art: The Duty to Obey the Law.” Legal Theory 10, pp. 215–259Google Scholar
Edmundson, William, and Golding, Martin, eds. 2004. Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Anthony. 1995. “Recent Work on Punishment.” Philosophical Quarterly 45, pp. 225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1970a. Doing and Deserving. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1970b. “The Expressive Function of Punishment.” In Feinberg 1970a, pp. 95–118
Finnis, John. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John. 1984. “The Authority of Law in the Predicament of Contemporary Social Theory.” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy 1, pp. 114–137Google Scholar
Finnis, John. 1996. “Is Natural Law Theory Compatible with Limited Government?” In George 1996b, pp. 1–26
Finnis, John. 1998a. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John. 1998b. “Public Good: The Specifically Political Common Good in Aquinas.” In George 1998, pp. 174–209
Foot, Philippa. 2001. Natural Goodness. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1988a. The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1988b. “On Bullshit.” In Frankfurt 1988a, pp. 117–133
Freeman, Michael, ed. 1998. Current Legal Problems 1998: Legal Theory at the End of the Millennium. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon. 1964. The Morality of Law. Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John. 2001. “Legal Positivism: 5½ Myths.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 46, pp. 199–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1986. Morals by Agreement. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Geach, Peter. 1956. “Good and Evil.” Analysis 17, pp. 33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P., ed. 1992. Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P. 1993. Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P. 1996a. The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P., ed. 1996b. Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P. 1996c. “Natural Law and Positive Law.” In George 1996a, pp. 321–334
George, Robert P. 1996d. “Preface.” In George 1996a, pp. ⅶ–ⅷ
George, Robert P., ed. 1998. Natural Law and Moral Inquiry: Ethics, Metaphysics, and Politics in the Work of Germain Grisez. Georgetown University PressGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P. 2000. “Kelsen and Aquinas on ‘the Natural-Law Doctrine.’Notre Dame Law Review 75, pp. 1625–1646Google Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret. 1999a. “Reconsidering the ‘Actual Contract’ Theory of Political Obligation.” Ethics 109, pp. 236–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret. 1999b. “Social Rules: Some Problems for Hart's Account, and an Alternative Proposal.” Law and Philosophy 18, pp. 141–171Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey D. 1990. “The Self-Destruction of Legal Positivism.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 10, pp. 449–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasso, Kenneth, Bradley, Gerard, and Hunt, Robert, eds. 1995. Catholicism, Liberalism, and Communitarianism. Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Green, Leslie. 1990. The Authority of the State. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Green, Leslie. 1996. “Who Believes in Political Obligation?” In Sanders and Narveson 1996, pp. 1–18
Griffin, James. 1986. Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Griffin, James. 1996. Value Judgement: Improving Our Ethical Beliefs. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Grisez, Germain. 1978. “Against Consequentialism.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 23, pp. 21–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1984. “A Moral Education Theory of Punishment.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 13, pp. 208–238Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1991. “A New Theory of Retribution.” In Morris and Frey 1991, pp. 377–414
Hart, H. L. A. 1955. “Are There Any Natural Rights?” Philosophical Review 64, pp. 175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1983a. Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1983b. “Introduction.” In Hart 1983a, pp. 1–18
Hart, H. L. A. 1983c [first published 1958]. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” In Hart 1983a, pp. 49–87
Hart, H. L. A. 1994 [first published 1961]. The Concept of Law, 2nd ed. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Himma, Kenneth Einar. 2001. “Law's Claim to Legitimate Authority.” In Coleman 2001, pp. 271–310
Hobbes, Thomas. 1994 [first published 1651]. Leviathan, ed. Edwin Curley. Hackett. Cited by part, chapter, and page number of ‘Head’ edition
Hook, Sidney, ed. 1964. Law and Philosophy. New York University PressGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1948a. Hume's Moral and Political Philosophy, ed. Aiken, Henry D.. HafnerGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1948b [first published 1748]. “Of the Original Contract.” In Hume 1948a, pp. 356–372. Cited as “Original Contract.”
Hume, David. 1978 [first published 1730]. Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind, Gavin Lawrence, and Warren Quinn, eds. 1995. Virtues and Reasons. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
, John XXIII. 1962. Mater et Magistra. Discoveries PressGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Matthew. 1999. In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. 1988. “Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex: Laws on Trial in Aquinas' Court of Conscience.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 33, pp. 99–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian. 2003. “Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48, pp. 17–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1988 [first published 1689]. Second Treatise of Government. In Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge University Press. References given by section numberGoogle Scholar
Lyons, David. 1984. Ethics and the Rule of Law. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. 1972. “Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers – I.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46 (suppl.), pp. 59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. 1992. “Natural Law and the Separation of Law and Morals.” In George 1992, pp. 105–133
Marmor, Andrei. 1992. Interpretation and Legal Theory. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
McInerny, Ralph. 1988a. Art and Prudence: Studies in the Thought of Jacques Maritain. University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
McInerny, Ralph. 1988b. “The Primacy of the Common Good.” In McInerny 1988a, pp. 77–91
Merricks, Trenton. 2001. Objects and Persons. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1979 [first published 1861]. Utilitarianism, ed. Sher, George. HackettGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael. 1987. “Authority, Law, and Razian Reasons,” Southern California Law Review 62, pp. 827–893Google Scholar
Moore, Michael. 1992. “Law as a Functional Kind.” In George 1992, pp. 188–242
Moore, Michael. 1997. Placing Blame: A General Theory of Criminal Law. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael. 2001. “Law as Justice.” Social Philosophy and Policy 18, pp. 115–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Christopher S., and Frey, Raymond, eds. 1991. Liability and Responsibility. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Morris, Herbert. 1976a. On Guilt and Innocence. University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Morris, Herbert. 1976b. “Persons and Punishment.” In Morris 1976a, pp. 31–58
Murphy, Mark C. 1994. “Acceptance of Authority and the Requirement to Comply with Just Institutions: A Comment on Waldron.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 23, pp. 271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 1995. “Was Hobbes a Legal Positivist?” Ethics 105, pp. 846–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 1997a. “Consent, Custom, and the Common Good in Aquinas's Account of Political Authority.” Review of Politics 59, pp. 323–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 1997b. “Surrender of Judgment and the Consent Theory of Political Authority.” Law and Philosophy 16, pp. 115–143Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 1999. “Moral Legitimacy and Political Obligation.” APA Newsletter on Law and Philosophy 99, pp. 77–80Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2001a. Natural Law and Practical Rationality. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2001b. “Natural Law, Consent, and Political Obligation.” Social Philosophy and Policy 18, pp. 70–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2002a. An Essay on Divine Authority. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2002b. “The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/natural-law-ethics/
Murphy, Mark C. 2003. “Natural Law Jurisprudence.” Legal Theory 9, pp. 241–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2004. “Natural Law Theory.” In Edmundson and Golding 2004, pp. 15–28
Murphy, Mark C. 2005a. “The Common Good.” Review of Metaphysics 59, pp. 143–177Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2005b. “Intention, Foresight, and Success.” In Oderberg and Chappell 2005, pp. 252–268
Murphy, Mark C. Forthcoming. “Authority.” In Borchert, forthcoming
Nagel, Thomas. 1970. The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Oderberg, David, and Chappell, Timothy, eds. 2005. Human Values: New Essays on Ethics and Natural Law. Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Dennis, ed. 1996. A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Patterson, James, and Peter Kim. 1991. The Day America Told the Truth. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
Perry, Stephen. 1993. “Loss, Agency, and Responsibility for Outcomes: Three Conceptions of Corrective Justice.” In Cooper-Stephenson and Gibson 1993, pp. 24–47
Pius, . 1931. Quadragesimo Anno. Barry VailGoogle Scholar
Plamenatz, J. P. 1968. Consent, Freedom, and Political Obligation. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1955. “Two Concepts of Rules.” Philosophical Review 64, pp. 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1964. “Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play.” In Hook 1964, pp. 3–18
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1972. “Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers – II.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46 (suppl.), pp. 79–102Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1979a. The Authority of Law. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1979b. “The Claims of Law.” In Raz 1979a, pp. 28–33
Raz, Joseph. 1981. “Authority and Consent.” Virginia Law Review 67, pp. 103–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1984a. “Hart on Moral Rights and Legal Duties.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 4, pp. 123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1984b. “The Obligation to Obey: Revision and Tradition.” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy 1, pp. 139–155Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1985. “Authority, Law, and Morality.” Monist 68, pp. 295–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Henry S. 1990. “Specifying Norms as a Way to Resolve Concrete Ethical Problems.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 19, pp. 279–310Google Scholar
Richardson, Henry S. 2000. “Specifying, Balancing, and Interpreting Bioethical Principles.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25, pp. 285–307CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, Henry S. 2002. Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning about the Ends of Policy. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1968 [first published 1762]. The Social Contract, trans. Cranston, Maurice. PenguinGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. S. 2000. “Trial by Slogan: Natural Law and Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex.” Law and Philosophy 19, pp. 433–449Google Scholar
Sanders, John T., and Narveson, Jan, eds. 1996. For and Against the State. Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. and Vanderveken, Daniel. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Shafer-Landau, Russ. 1996. “The Failure of Retributivism.” Philosophical Studies 82, pp. 289–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Scott. 1998. “On Hart's Way Out.” Legal Theory 4, pp. 469–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, George. 1983. “Why the Past Matters.” Philosophical Studies 43, pp. 183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, George. 1987. Desert. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1907. Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. HackettGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1979. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Simon, Yves. 1962. A General Theory of Authority. University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
Skillen, Anthony. 1980. “How to Say Things With Walls.” Philosophy 55, pp. 509–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. B. E. 1973. “Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law?” Yale Law Journal 82, pp. 950–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael. 1994. The Moral Problem. BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Soper, Philip. 1983. “Legal Theory and the Problem of Definition.” University of Chicago Law Review 50, pp. 1170–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soper, Philip. 2002. The Ethics of Deference. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1997a. Philosophical Arguments. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1997b. “Irreducibly Social Goods.” In Taylor 1997a, pp. 127–145
Thompson, Michael. 1995. “The Representation of Life.” In Hursthouse, Lawrence, and Quinn 1995, pp. 247–296
Tuckness, Alex. 1999. “The Coherence of a Mind: John Locke and the Law of Nature.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 37, pp. 73–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomela, Raimo. 1995. The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions. Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. YaleGoogle Scholar
Inwagen, Peter. 1990. Material Beings. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1993. “Special Ties and Natural Duties.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 22, pp. 3–30Google Scholar
Wolfe, Christopher. 1995. “Subsidiarity: The ‘Other’ Ground of Limited Government.” In Grasso, Bradley, and Hunt 1995, pp. 81–96
Alexy, Robert. 1998. “Law and Correctness.” In Freeman 1998, pp. 205–222
Alexy, Robert. 1999. “A Defense of Radbruch's Formula.” In Dyzenhaus 1999, pp. 16–39
Alston, William P. 1999. Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1993. Value in Ethics and Economics. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1969. “On Promising and Its Justice, and Whether It Needs to be Respected In Foro Interno.” Critica 3, pp. 61–83Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. 1981. Summa Theologiae, trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Christian Classics. References given by part, question, and article number
Aristotle. 1998. Politics, trans. C. D. C. Reeve. Hackett. References given by Bekker numbers
Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Terence Irwin. Hackett. References given by Bekker numbers
Austin, John. 1995 [first published 1832]. Province of Jurisprudence Determined, ed. Rumble, Wilfrid. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1946 [first published 1936]. Language, Truth, and Logic, 2nd ed. DoverGoogle Scholar
Bedau, Mark. 1992a. “Where's the Good in Teleology?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52, pp. 781–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedau, Mark. 1992b. “Goal-Directed Systems and the Good.” Monist 75, pp. 34–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1996 [first published 1789]. Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Bix, Brian. 1993. Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Bix, Brian. 1996. “Natural Law Theory.” In Patterson 1996, pp. 223–240
Bix, Brian. 1999. “Patrolling the Boundaries: Inclusive Legal Positivism and the Nature of Jurisprudential Debate.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12, pp. 17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bix, Brian. 2000. “On the Dividing Line Between Natural Law Theory and Legal Positivism.” Notre Dame Law Review 75, pp. 1613–1624Google Scholar
Bix, Brian. 2002. “Natural Law Theory: The Modern Tradition.” In Coleman and Shapiro 2002, pp. 61–103
Borchert, Donald, ed. Forthcoming. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd. edition. Macmillan
Chappell, Timothy. 2005. “The Polymorphy of Practical Reason.” In Oderberg and Chappell 2005, pp. 102–126
Christiano, Thomas. 1996. The Rule of the Many: Fundamental Issues in Democratic Theory. WestviewGoogle Scholar
Cochran, Clarke E. 1978. “Yves R. Simon and ‘the Common Good’: A Note on the Concept.” Ethics 88, pp. 229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules, and Brian Leiter. 1996. “Legal Positivism.” In Patterson 1996, pp. 241–260
Coleman, Jules, and Shapiro, Scott, eds. 2002. Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules. 1982. “Negative and Positive Positivism.” Journal of Legal Studies 11, pp. 139–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Jules, ed. 2001. Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper-Stephenson, Ken, and Gibson, Elaine, eds. 1993. Tort Theory. Captus PressGoogle Scholar
Dupré, Louis. 1993. “The Common Good and the Open Society.” Review of Politics 55, pp. 687–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977a. Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977b. “Hard Cases.” In Dworkin 1977a, pp. 81–130
Dworkin, Ronald. 1982. “‘Natural’ Law Revisited,” University of Florida Law Review 34, pp. 165–210Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2002. “Thirty Years On.” Harvard Law Review 115, pp. 1655–1687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, ed. 1999. Recrafting the Rule of Law. Hart PublishingGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, William. 1998. Three Anarchical Fallacies. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, William, ed. 1999a. The Duty to Obey the Law: Selected Philosophical Readings. Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Edmundson, William. 1999b. “Introduction.” In Edmundson 1999a, pp. 1–15
Edmundson, William. 1999c. “Introduction: Some Recent Work on Political Obligation.” APA Newsletter on Law and Philosophy 99, pp. 62–67Google Scholar
Edmundson, William. 2004. “State of the Art: The Duty to Obey the Law.” Legal Theory 10, pp. 215–259Google Scholar
Edmundson, William, and Golding, Martin, eds. 2004. Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Anthony. 1995. “Recent Work on Punishment.” Philosophical Quarterly 45, pp. 225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1970a. Doing and Deserving. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1970b. “The Expressive Function of Punishment.” In Feinberg 1970a, pp. 95–118
Finnis, John. 1980. Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John. 1984. “The Authority of Law in the Predicament of Contemporary Social Theory.” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy 1, pp. 114–137Google Scholar
Finnis, John. 1996. “Is Natural Law Theory Compatible with Limited Government?” In George 1996b, pp. 1–26
Finnis, John. 1998a. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John. 1998b. “Public Good: The Specifically Political Common Good in Aquinas.” In George 1998, pp. 174–209
Foot, Philippa. 2001. Natural Goodness. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1988a. The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1988b. “On Bullshit.” In Frankfurt 1988a, pp. 117–133
Freeman, Michael, ed. 1998. Current Legal Problems 1998: Legal Theory at the End of the Millennium. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon. 1964. The Morality of Law. Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John. 2001. “Legal Positivism: 5½ Myths.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 46, pp. 199–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, David. 1986. Morals by Agreement. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Geach, Peter. 1956. “Good and Evil.” Analysis 17, pp. 33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P., ed. 1992. Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P. 1993. Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P. 1996a. The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P., ed. 1996b. Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P. 1996c. “Natural Law and Positive Law.” In George 1996a, pp. 321–334
George, Robert P. 1996d. “Preface.” In George 1996a, pp. ⅶ–ⅷ
George, Robert P., ed. 1998. Natural Law and Moral Inquiry: Ethics, Metaphysics, and Politics in the Work of Germain Grisez. Georgetown University PressGoogle Scholar
George, Robert P. 2000. “Kelsen and Aquinas on ‘the Natural-Law Doctrine.’Notre Dame Law Review 75, pp. 1625–1646Google Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret. 1999a. “Reconsidering the ‘Actual Contract’ Theory of Political Obligation.” Ethics 109, pp. 236–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret. 1999b. “Social Rules: Some Problems for Hart's Account, and an Alternative Proposal.” Law and Philosophy 18, pp. 141–171Google Scholar
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey D. 1990. “The Self-Destruction of Legal Positivism.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 10, pp. 449–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasso, Kenneth, Bradley, Gerard, and Hunt, Robert, eds. 1995. Catholicism, Liberalism, and Communitarianism. Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Green, Leslie. 1990. The Authority of the State. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Green, Leslie. 1996. “Who Believes in Political Obligation?” In Sanders and Narveson 1996, pp. 1–18
Griffin, James. 1986. Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Griffin, James. 1996. Value Judgement: Improving Our Ethical Beliefs. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Grisez, Germain. 1978. “Against Consequentialism.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 23, pp. 21–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1984. “A Moral Education Theory of Punishment.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 13, pp. 208–238Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean. 1991. “A New Theory of Retribution.” In Morris and Frey 1991, pp. 377–414
Hart, H. L. A. 1955. “Are There Any Natural Rights?” Philosophical Review 64, pp. 175–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1983a. Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1983b. “Introduction.” In Hart 1983a, pp. 1–18
Hart, H. L. A. 1983c [first published 1958]. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals.” In Hart 1983a, pp. 49–87
Hart, H. L. A. 1994 [first published 1961]. The Concept of Law, 2nd ed. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Himma, Kenneth Einar. 2001. “Law's Claim to Legitimate Authority.” In Coleman 2001, pp. 271–310
Hobbes, Thomas. 1994 [first published 1651]. Leviathan, ed. Edwin Curley. Hackett. Cited by part, chapter, and page number of ‘Head’ edition
Hook, Sidney, ed. 1964. Law and Philosophy. New York University PressGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1948a. Hume's Moral and Political Philosophy, ed. Aiken, Henry D.. HafnerGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1948b [first published 1748]. “Of the Original Contract.” In Hume 1948a, pp. 356–372. Cited as “Original Contract.”
Hume, David. 1978 [first published 1730]. Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A.. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hursthouse, Rosalind, Gavin Lawrence, and Warren Quinn, eds. 1995. Virtues and Reasons. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
, John XXIII. 1962. Mater et Magistra. Discoveries PressGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Matthew. 1999. In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law Without Trimmings. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. 1988. “Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex: Laws on Trial in Aquinas' Court of Conscience.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 33, pp. 99–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiter, Brian. 2003. “Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48, pp. 17–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1969. Convention. BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1988 [first published 1689]. Second Treatise of Government. In Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge University Press. References given by section numberGoogle Scholar
Lyons, David. 1984. Ethics and the Rule of Law. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. 1972. “Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers – I.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46 (suppl.), pp. 59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, Neil. 1992. “Natural Law and the Separation of Law and Morals.” In George 1992, pp. 105–133
Marmor, Andrei. 1992. Interpretation and Legal Theory. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
McInerny, Ralph. 1988a. Art and Prudence: Studies in the Thought of Jacques Maritain. University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
McInerny, Ralph. 1988b. “The Primacy of the Common Good.” In McInerny 1988a, pp. 77–91
Merricks, Trenton. 2001. Objects and Persons. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1979 [first published 1861]. Utilitarianism, ed. Sher, George. HackettGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael. 1987. “Authority, Law, and Razian Reasons,” Southern California Law Review 62, pp. 827–893Google Scholar
Moore, Michael. 1992. “Law as a Functional Kind.” In George 1992, pp. 188–242
Moore, Michael. 1997. Placing Blame: A General Theory of Criminal Law. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael. 2001. “Law as Justice.” Social Philosophy and Policy 18, pp. 115–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Christopher S., and Frey, Raymond, eds. 1991. Liability and Responsibility. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Morris, Herbert. 1976a. On Guilt and Innocence. University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Morris, Herbert. 1976b. “Persons and Punishment.” In Morris 1976a, pp. 31–58
Murphy, Mark C. 1994. “Acceptance of Authority and the Requirement to Comply with Just Institutions: A Comment on Waldron.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 23, pp. 271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 1995. “Was Hobbes a Legal Positivist?” Ethics 105, pp. 846–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 1997a. “Consent, Custom, and the Common Good in Aquinas's Account of Political Authority.” Review of Politics 59, pp. 323–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 1997b. “Surrender of Judgment and the Consent Theory of Political Authority.” Law and Philosophy 16, pp. 115–143Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 1999. “Moral Legitimacy and Political Obligation.” APA Newsletter on Law and Philosophy 99, pp. 77–80Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2001a. Natural Law and Practical Rationality. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2001b. “Natural Law, Consent, and Political Obligation.” Social Philosophy and Policy 18, pp. 70–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2002a. An Essay on Divine Authority. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2002b. “The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2002/entries/natural-law-ethics/
Murphy, Mark C. 2003. “Natural Law Jurisprudence.” Legal Theory 9, pp. 241–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2004. “Natural Law Theory.” In Edmundson and Golding 2004, pp. 15–28
Murphy, Mark C. 2005a. “The Common Good.” Review of Metaphysics 59, pp. 143–177Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. 2005b. “Intention, Foresight, and Success.” In Oderberg and Chappell 2005, pp. 252–268
Murphy, Mark C. Forthcoming. “Authority.” In Borchert, forthcoming
Nagel, Thomas. 1970. The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Oderberg, David, and Chappell, Timothy, eds. 2005. Human Values: New Essays on Ethics and Natural Law. Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Dennis, ed. 1996. A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Patterson, James, and Peter Kim. 1991. The Day America Told the Truth. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
Perry, Stephen. 1993. “Loss, Agency, and Responsibility for Outcomes: Three Conceptions of Corrective Justice.” In Cooper-Stephenson and Gibson 1993, pp. 24–47
Pius, . 1931. Quadragesimo Anno. Barry VailGoogle Scholar
Plamenatz, J. P. 1968. Consent, Freedom, and Political Obligation. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1955. “Two Concepts of Rules.” Philosophical Review 64, pp. 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 1964. “Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play.” In Hook 1964, pp. 3–18
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press of Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1972. “Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers – II.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46 (suppl.), pp. 79–102Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1979a. The Authority of Law. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1979b. “The Claims of Law.” In Raz 1979a, pp. 28–33
Raz, Joseph. 1981. “Authority and Consent.” Virginia Law Review 67, pp. 103–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1984a. “Hart on Moral Rights and Legal Duties.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 4, pp. 123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1984b. “The Obligation to Obey: Revision and Tradition.” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, and Public Policy 1, pp. 139–155Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1985. “Authority, Law, and Morality.” Monist 68, pp. 295–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Henry S. 1990. “Specifying Norms as a Way to Resolve Concrete Ethical Problems.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 19, pp. 279–310Google Scholar
Richardson, Henry S. 2000. “Specifying, Balancing, and Interpreting Bioethical Principles.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25, pp. 285–307CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, Henry S. 2002. Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning about the Ends of Policy. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1968 [first published 1762]. The Social Contract, trans. Cranston, Maurice. PenguinGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. S. 2000. “Trial by Slogan: Natural Law and Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex.” Law and Philosophy 19, pp. 433–449Google Scholar
Sanders, John T., and Narveson, Jan, eds. 1996. For and Against the State. Rowman and LittlefieldGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. and Vanderveken, Daniel. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Shafer-Landau, Russ. 1996. “The Failure of Retributivism.” Philosophical Studies 82, pp. 289–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Scott. 1998. “On Hart's Way Out.” Legal Theory 4, pp. 469–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, George. 1983. “Why the Past Matters.” Philosophical Studies 43, pp. 183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, George. 1987. Desert. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1907. Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. HackettGoogle Scholar
Simmons, A. John. 1979. Moral Principles and Political Obligations. Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Simon, Yves. 1962. A General Theory of Authority. University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
Skillen, Anthony. 1980. “How to Say Things With Walls.” Philosophy 55, pp. 509–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. B. E. 1973. “Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law?” Yale Law Journal 82, pp. 950–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael. 1994. The Moral Problem. BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Soper, Philip. 1983. “Legal Theory and the Problem of Definition.” University of Chicago Law Review 50, pp. 1170–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soper, Philip. 2002. The Ethics of Deference. Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1997a. Philosophical Arguments. Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1997b. “Irreducibly Social Goods.” In Taylor 1997a, pp. 127–145
Thompson, Michael. 1995. “The Representation of Life.” In Hursthouse, Lawrence, and Quinn 1995, pp. 247–296
Tuckness, Alex. 1999. “The Coherence of a Mind: John Locke and the Law of Nature.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 37, pp. 73–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomela, Raimo. 1995. The Importance of Us: A Philosophical Study of Basic Social Notions. Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. YaleGoogle Scholar
Inwagen, Peter. 1990. Material Beings. Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1993. “Special Ties and Natural Duties.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 22, pp. 3–30Google Scholar
Wolfe, Christopher. 1995. “Subsidiarity: The ‘Other’ Ground of Limited Government.” In Grasso, Bradley, and Hunt 1995, pp. 81–96

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • Mark C. Murphy, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics
  • Online publication: 10 March 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663772.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • Mark C. Murphy, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics
  • Online publication: 10 March 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663772.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • Mark C. Murphy, Georgetown University, Washington DC
  • Book: Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics
  • Online publication: 10 March 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663772.010
Available formats
×