Baumol, William J., Panzar, John C., and Willig, Robert D.. Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982).Google Scholar

Berg, Sanford V. and Tschirhart, John. Natural Monopoly Regulation: Principles and Practice, Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Blair, Roger D. and Sokol, D. Daniel, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property, and High Tech (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bork, Robert H. The Antitrust Paradox, 2nd ed. (New York: Free Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Botsman, Rachel and Rogers, Roo. What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption (New York: HarperCollins, 2010).Google Scholar

Chandler, Alfred D. Jr The Visible Hand (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Chopra, Sunil and Meindl, Peter. Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation (Pearson: London, 2014).Google Scholar

Christensen, Clayton M. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Croley, Steven P. Regulation and Public Interests: The Possibility of Good Regulatory Government (Cambridge, MA: Princeton University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Elhauge, Einer and Geradin, Damien. Global Antitrust Law and Economics, 2nd ed., University Casebook Series (New York: Foundation Press Thomson/West 2011).Google Scholar

Evans, David and Schmalensee, Richard. Matchmakers: The New Economics of Multisided Platforms (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Ezrachi, Ariel and Stucke, Maurice E.. Virtual Competition: The Promise and Perils of the Algorithm-Driven Economy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, Eleanor M. and Trebilcock, Michael J.. The Design of Competition Law Institutions, Global Norms, Local Choices (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Galloway, Scott. The Four: The Hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google (London: Penguin, 2017).Google Scholar

Goldin, Claudia and Katz, Lawrence F.. The Race Between Education and Technology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Kahn, Alfred. The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Laffont, Jean-Jacques and Tirole, Jean. A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Lanier, Jaron. Who Owns The Future? (London: Penguin, 2013).Google Scholar

Letwin, William. Law and Economic Policy in America (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1859).Google Scholar

McKee, Derek and Scassa, Teresa, eds. Law and the “Sharing Economy”: Regulating Online Market Platforms (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Motta, Massimo. Competition Policy: Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Parker, Geoffrey G., Van Alstyne, Marshall W., and Choudary, Sangeet Paul. Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2016).Google Scholar

Peltzman, Sam and Winston, Clifford. Deregulation of Network Industries: What’s Next? (Washington, DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, 2000).Google Scholar

Posner, Richard. Antitrust Law, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Ramanadham, V. V. The Economics of Public Enterprise (London: Routledge, 1991).Google Scholar

Rifkin, Jeremy. The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism (New York: Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar

Roth, Alvin E. Who Gets What and Why: The New Economics of Matchmaking and Market Design (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2015).Google Scholar

Scherer, F. M. and Ross, David. Industrial Market structure and Economic Performance, 3rd ed. (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1990).Google Scholar

Schmalensee, Richard. The Control of Natural Monopolies (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1979).Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (London: Harper & Brothers, 1942).Google Scholar

Seager, Henry Rogers and Gulick, Charles Adams. Trust and Corporation Problems (New York: Harper, 1929).Google Scholar

Sharkey, William W. The Theory of Natural Monopoly (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Shy, Oz. The Economics of Network Industries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Slee, Tom. What’s Yours Is Mine: Against the Sharing Economy (New York: Penguin, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Srinivasan, Bhu. Americana: A 400-Year History of American Capitalism (New York: Penguin, 2017).Google Scholar

Stone, Brad. The Everything Store: Jeff Bezos and the Age of Amazon (New York: Little, Brown, 2013).Google Scholar

Sundararajan, Arun. The Sharing Economy: The End of Employment and the Rise of Crowd-Based Capitalism (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Susskind, Richard. The Future of Law: Facing the Challenges of Information Technology (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Susskind, Richard and Susskind, Daniel. The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Taplin, Jonathan. Move Fast and Break Things: How Facebook, Google, and Amazon Cornered Culture and Undermined Democracy (New York: Little, Brown, 2017).Google Scholar

Tepper, Jonathan. The Myth of Capitalism: Monopolies and the Death of Competition (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2018).Google Scholar

Tirole, Jean. Economics for the Common Good (Cambridge, MA: Princeton University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trebilcock, Michael J., Winter, Ralph A., and Iacobucci, Edward M.. The Law and Economics of Canadian Competition Policy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Van, Parijs, Philippe and Vanderborght, Yannick. Basic Income, A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Vickers, John and Yarrow, George K.. Privatization: An Economic Analysis, MIT Press Series on the Regulation of Economic Activity 18 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E. Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization (New York: Free Press, 1975).Google Scholar

Wu, Tim. The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires, 1st ed. (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2010).Google Scholar

Wu, Tim. The Curse of Bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age (New York: Columbia Global Reports, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrahamson, Zachary. “Essential Data” (2014) 124, no. 3, Yale Law Journal, available at https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj/vol124/iss3/7.Google Scholar

Aghion, Philippe, Bloom, Nick, Bundell, Richard, Griffith, Rachel, and Howitt, Peter. “Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship” (2005) 120, no. 2, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 701.Google Scholar

Akman, Pinar. “The Theory of Abuse in Google Search: A Positive and Normative Assessment Under EU Competition Law,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2811789 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alarie, Benjamin, Niblett, Anthony, and Yoon, Albert H.. “Law in the Future” (2016) 66, no. 4, UTLJ, 423.Google Scholar

Alchian, Armen and Demsetz, Harold. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization” (1972) 62, no. 5, American Economic Review, 777.Google Scholar

Amelio, Andrea and Jullien, Bruno. “Tying and Freebies in Two-Sided Markets” (2012) 30, no. 5, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amelio, Andrea, Karlinger, Liliane, and Valletti, Tommaso. “Exclusionary Practices and Two-sided Platforms.” Note by Andrea Amelio, Liliane Karlinger, and Tommaso Valletti, “Hearing on Re-Thinking the Use of Traditional Antitrust Enforcement Tools in Multi-Sided Markets,” DAF/COMP/WD(2017)34/FINAL (OECD, 2017).Google Scholar

Anchustegui, Ignacio Herrera and Julian Nowag. “Buyer Power in the Big Data and Algorithm Driven World: the Uber and Lyft Example” (2017) CPI Antitrust Chronicle, available at www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/CPI-Anchustegui-Nowag.pdf.Google Scholar

Andreu, Enrique and Padilla, Jorge. “Quantifying Horizontal Merger Efficiencies in Multi-Sided Markets: An Application to Stock Exchange Mergers” – Note by Enrique Andreu and Jorge Padilla, “Hearing on Re-Thinking the Use of Traditional Antitrust Enforcement Tools in Multi-Sided Markets,” DAF/COMP/WD(2017)37/FINAL (2017).Google Scholar

Areeda, Phillip. “Essential Facilities: An Epithet in Need of Limiting Principles” (1989) 58 no. 3, Antitrust Law Journal, 841.Google Scholar

Argentesi, Elena and Filistrucchi, Lapo. “Estimating Market Power in a Two-Sided Market: The Case of Newspapers” (2007) 22, no. 7, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Argentesi, Elena and Ivaldi, Marc. “Market Definition in the Printed Media Industry: Theory and Practice,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 779107 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2005).Google Scholar

Argenton, Cédric and Jens Prüfer, . “Search Engine Competition with Network Externalities” (2012) 8, no. 1 Jnl of Competition Law & Economics, 73.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Mark. “Competition in Two-Sided Markets” (2006) 37, no. 3, RAND Journal of Economics, 668.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Mark and Sappington, David E. M.. “Regulation, Competition and Liberalization” (2006) 44, no. 2, Journal of Economic Literature, 325.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Mark and Wright, Julian. “Two-sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts” (2007) 32, no. 2, Economic Theory, 353.Google Scholar

Arrow, Kenneth. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention” in The Rate and Direction of Economic Activities: Economic and Social Factors (Cambridge, MA: Princeton University Press, 1962).Google Scholar

Autor, David, Dorn, David, Katz, Lawrence F., Patterson, Christina, and Van Reenen., John “Concentrating on the Fall of the Labor Share” (2017) 107, no. 5, American Economic Review, 180.Google Scholar

Autor, David, Dorn, David, Katz, Lawrence F., Patterson, Christina, and Van Reenen., John. “The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms” (2017) Working Paper, available at https://scholar.harvard.edu/lkatz/publications/fall-labor-share-and-rise-superstar-firms.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Azar, José, Raina, Sahil, and Schmalz, Martin C. “Ultimate Ownership and Bank Competition,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2710252 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Azar, José, Schmalz, Martin C., and Tecu, Isabel. “Anticompetitive Effects of Common Ownership,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2427345 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Jonathan B. “Market Power in the U.S. Economy Today” (March 20, 2017), available at https://equitablegrowth.org/market-power-in-the-u-s-economy-today/.Google Scholar

Baker, Jonathan B. and Chevalier, Judith A.. “The Competitive Consequences of Most-Favored-Nation Provisions” (2012) 27, Antitrust, 20.Google Scholar

Baker, Jonathan B. and Morton, Fiona Scott. “Antitrust Enforcement Against Platform MFNs” (2018) 127, no. 7, Yale LJ, 2176.Google Scholar

Baker, Jonathan, Rose, Nancy, Salop, Steven, and Morton, Fiona Scott. “Five Principles for Vertical Merger Enforcement Policy,” Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works 2148–2019 (2019), available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3351391.Google Scholar

Barkai, Simcha. “Declining Labor and Capital Shares” (2017) Working Paper, available at www.london.edu/faculty-and-research/academic-research/d/declining-labor-and-capital-shares.Google Scholar

Baxter, William F. “Bank Interchange of Transactional Paper: Legal and Economic Perspectives” (1983) 26, no. 3, Journal of Law and Economics, 541.Google Scholar

Behringer, Stefan and Filistrucchi, Lapo. “Areeda–Turner in Two-Sided Markets” (2015) 46, no. 3, Rev Ind Organ, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belleflamme, Paul and Peitz, Martin. “Platforms and Network Effects,” Working Papers 16–14 (University of Mannheim, Department of Economics, 2016).Google Scholar

Benkler, Yochai. “Sharing Nicely: On Shareable Goods and the Emergence of Sharing as a Modality of Economic Production” (2004) 114 Yale LJ, 273.Google Scholar

Bessen, James E. “Information Technology and Industry Concentration,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3044730 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2017).Google Scholar

Blonigen, Bruce A. and Pierce, Justin R.. “Evidence for the Effects of Mergers on Market Power and Efficiency” Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2016–082 (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (US), 2016).Google Scholar

Boffa, Federico and Filistrucchi, Lapo. “Optimal Cartel Prices in Two-Sided Markets” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2506510 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2014).Google Scholar

Boik, Andre and Corts, Kenneth S.. “The Effects of Platform Most-Favored-Nation Clauses on Competition and Entry” (2016) 59, no. 1, Journal of Law and Economics, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bortolotti, B., Fantini, M, and Siniscalco, D. “Privatisation Around the World: Evidence from Panel Data” (2004) 88, no. 1–2, Journal of Public Economics, 305.Google Scholar

Bower, Joseph and Christensen, Clayton. “Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave” (1995) 73 Harvard Business Review, 43.Google Scholar

Brekke, Kurt. “Measuring Market Power in Multi-Sided Markets” – Note by Kurt Brekke, “Hearing on Re-Thinking the Use of Traditional Antitrust Enforcement Tools in Multi-Sided Markets,” DAF/COMP/WD(2017)31/FINAL (OECD, 2017).Google Scholar

Brill, Julie. “Statement of the Commission Regarding Google’s Search Practices” Statement 111–0163 (Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission, 2013).Google Scholar

Brin, S. and Page, L. “The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine” (1998) 30 Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 107–117.Google Scholar

Budzinski, Oliver and Köhler, Karoline Henrike. “Is Amazon the Next Google?” Working Paper 97 (Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers, 2015).Google Scholar

Caillaud, Bernard and Jullien, Bruno. “Chicken & Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers” (2003) 34, no. 2 RAND Journal of Economics, 309.Google Scholar

Cairns, Robert and Liston-Heyes, Catherine. “Competition and Regulation in the Taxi Industry” (1996) 59, no. 1, Journal of Public Economics, 1.Google Scholar

Carlton, Dennis W. and Waldman, Michael. “The Strategic Use of Tying to Preserve and Create Market Power in Evolving Industries” (2002) 33, no. 2 RAND Journal of Economics, 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlton, Dennis W. and Winter, Ralph A.. “Vertical MFN’s and the Credit Card No-Surcharge Rule,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2982115 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casey, Anthony J. and Niblett, Anthony. “Self-Driving Laws” (2016) 66, no. 4, UTLJ, 429.Google Scholar

Cetin, Tamer and Deakin, Elizabeth. “Regulation of Taxis and the Rise of Ridesharing” (2017) Transport Policy, available at www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X17300409.Google Scholar

Chandra, Ambarish and Collard‐Wexler, Allan. “Mergers in Two-Sided Markets: An Application to the Canadian Newspaper Industry” (2009) 18, no. 4, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 1045.Google Scholar

Choi, Jay Pil and Jeon, oh-Shin. “A Leverage Theory of Tying in Two-Sided Markets,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2834821 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2016).Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. “The Nature of the Firm” (1937) 4, no. 16 Economica, 386.Google Scholar

Codagnone, Cristiano and Martens, Bertin. “Scoping the Sharing Economy: Origins, Definitions, Impact and Regulatory Issues,” JRC Technical Reports Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Digital Economy Working Paper JRC100369 (2016).Google Scholar

Collyer, Kate, Mullan, Hugh, and Timan, Natalie. “Measuring Market Power in Multi-Sided Markets” – Note by Kate Collyer, Hugh Mullan and Natalie Timan, DAF/COMP/WD(2017)35/FINAL (2017).Google Scholar

Cohen, Molly and Sundararajan, Arun. “Self-Regulation and Innovation in the Peer-to-Peer Sharing Economy” (2015) 82 U Chi L Rev Dialogue, 116.Google Scholar

Cohen, Peter, et al. “Using Big Data to Estimate Consumer Surplus: The Case of Uber” (2016), available at awww.datascienceassn.org/sites/default/files/Using%20Big%20Data%20to%20Estimate%20Consumer%20Surplus%20at%20Uber.pdf.Google Scholar

Cornière, Alexandre de and Greg, Taylor. “Integration and Search Engine Bias” (2014) 45, no. 3, RAND Journal of Economics, 576.Google Scholar

Crane, Daniel A. “Balancing Effects Across Markets” (2015) 80, no. 2, Antitrust Law Journal, 397.Google Scholar

De Loecker, Jan, Eeckhout, Jan, and Unger, Gabriel. “The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications,” Draft, November 22, 2018.Google Scholar

Decker, Ryan, Haltiwanger, John, Jarmin, Ron, and Miranda, Javier. “The Role of Entrepreneurship in US Job Creation and Economic Dynamism” (2014) 28, no. 3, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3.Google Scholar

Decker, Ryan, Haltiwanger, John, Jarmin, Ron, and Miranda, Javier.“The Secular Decline in Business Dynamism in the U.S.,” Working Paper (Ann Arbor: University of Maryland, 2014).Google Scholar

Delbono, Flavio and Lambertini, Luca. “Innovation and Product Market Concentration: Schumpeter, Arrow and the Inverted-U Shape Curve,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2981677 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2017).Google Scholar

Demsetz, Harold. “The Cost of Transacting” (1968) 82, no. 1, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 33.Google Scholar

Demsetz, Harold. “Why Regulate Utilities?” (1968) 11, no. 1, Journal of Law and Economics, 55.Google Scholar

Demsetz, Harold. “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint” (1969) 12 J Law Econ, 1.Google Scholar

Dempsey, Paul Stephen. “Taxi Industry Regulation, Deregulation, and Reregulation: The Paradox of Market Failure,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2241306 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 1996).Google Scholar

Dewenter, Ralf, Haucap, Justus, and Wenzel, Tobias. “Semi-Collusion in Media Markets” (2011) 31, no. 2, International Review of Law and Economics, 92.Google Scholar

Dolmans, Maurits and Graf, Thomas. “Analysis of Tying Under Article 82 EC: The European Commission’s Microsoft Decision in Perspective” (2004) 27, no. 2, World Competition, 225.Google Scholar

Dou, Zhicheng, Song, Ruihua, and Wen, Ji-Rong. “A Large-scale Evaluation and Analysis of Personalized Search Strategies” (2007) New York: ACM, available at https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1242651Google Scholar

Dube, Aindrajit, et al. “Monopsony in On-line Labor Markets” (2018) Draft (Paper under Preparation).Google Scholar

Ducci, Francesco. “Procedural Implications of Market Definition in Platform Cases” (jnz017, 2019) Journal of Antitrust Enforcement.Google Scholar

Ducci, Francesco and Michael, Trebilcock. “The Revival of Fairness Discourse in Competition Policy” (2019) 64 The Antitrust Bulletin, 79–104.Google Scholar

Economides, Nicholas and Lianos, Ioannis. “The Elusive Antitrust Standard on Bundling in Europe and in the United States at the Aftermath of the Microsoft Cases” (2009) 76 Antitrust Law Journal, 483–567.Google Scholar

Edelman, Benjamin G. “Does Google Leverage Market Power Through Tying and Bundling?” (2015) 11, no. 2, Journal of Competition Law and Economics.Google Scholar

Edelman, Benjamin G. and Geradin, Damien. “Efficiencies and Regulatory Shortcuts: How Should We Regulate Companies Like Airbnb and Uber” (2015) 19 Stan Tech L Rev, 293.Google Scholar

Edelman, Benjamin G. and Wright, Julian. “Price Coherence and Excessive Intermediation,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2513513 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2015).Google Scholar

Einav, Liran, Farronato, Chiara, and Levin, Jonathan. “Peer-to-Peer Markets” (2016) 8, no. 1, Annual Review of Economics, 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elhauge, Einer. “Horizontal Shareholding” (2015) 129 Harv L Rev, 1267.Google Scholar

Evans, David S. “The Antitrust Economics of Multi-Sided Platform Markets” (2003) 20 Yale J on Reg, 325.Google Scholar

Evans, David S.. “Multisided Platforms, Dynamic Competition, and the Assessment of Market Power for Internet-Based Firms,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2746095 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2016).Google Scholar

Evans, David S.. “Why the Dynamics of Competition for Online Platforms Leads to Sleepless Nights But Not Sleepy Monopolies,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3009438 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2017).Google Scholar

Evans, David S. and Noel, Michael. “Defining Antitrust Markets When Firms Operate Two-Sided Platforms” (2005) 2005 Colum Bus L Rev, 667.Google Scholar

Evans, David S. and Schmalensee., Richard “The Industrial Organization of Markets with Two-Sided Platforms,” NBER Working Paper No. 11603 (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2005).Google Scholar

Evans, David S. and Schmalensee., Richard. “The Antitrust Analysis of Multi-sided Platform Businesses” in Oxford Handbook on International Antitrust Economics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Evans, David S. and Schmalensee., Richard. “Debunking the ‘Network Effects’ Bogeyman,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3148121 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2017).Google Scholar

Evans, David S. and Schmalensee., Richard. “Network Effects: March to the Evidence Not to the Slogans,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3027691 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2017).Google Scholar

Evans, David S. and Schmalensee., Richard. “Ignoring Two-Sided Business Reality Can Also Hurt Plaintiffs” (2018) Competition Policy International.Google Scholar

Ezrachi, Ariel and Stucke, Maurice E. “Artificial Intelligence & Collusion: When Computers Inhibit Competition” (2017) 2017 U Ill L Rev, 1775.Google Scholar

Farrell, Joseph and Katz, Michael L. “Competition or Predation? Consumer Coordination, Strategic Pricing and Price Floors in Network Markets” (2005) 53, no. 2, Journal of Industrial Economics, 203.Google Scholar

Farrell, Joseph and Saloner, Garth. “Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation” (1985) 16, no. 1, RAND Journal of Economics, 70.Google Scholar

Farronato, Chiara and Fradkin, Audrey. “Market Structure with the Entry of Peer-to-Peer Platforms: The Case of Hotels and Airbnb” (2016) Unpublished Draft, available at https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=IIOC2016&paper_id=285.Google Scholar

Filistrucchi, Lapo. “How Many Markets Are Two-Sided?” (2011) 1 Antitrust Chronicle, available at https://econpapers.repec.org/article/cpiatchrn/1.1.2011_3ai=5804.htm.Google Scholar

Filistrucchi, Lapo.“Market Definition in Multi-Sided Markets” – Note by Dr Lapo Filistrucchi, “Hearing on Re-Thinking the Use of Traditional Antitrust Enforcement Tools in Multi-Sided Markets,” DAF/COMP/WD(2017)27/FINAL (OECD, 2017).Google Scholar

Filistrucchi, Lapo, Geradin, Damien, and Eric, Van Damme. “Identifying Two-Sided Markets” (2013) 36 World Competition, 33.Google Scholar

Filistrucchi, Lapo, Geradin, Damien, Damme, Eric Van, and Affeldt, Pauline. “Market Definition in Two-Sided Markets: Theory And Practice” (2014) 10, no. 2, Jnl of Competition Law & Economics, 293.Google Scholar

Filistrucchi, Lapo, Klein, Tobias J., and Michielsen, Thomas O.. “Assessing Unilateral Merger Effects In a Two-Sided Market: An Application to the Dutch Daily Newspaper Market” (2012) 8, no. 2, Jnl of Competition Law & Economics, 297.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Amelia. “Predatory Pricing in Two-Sided Markets: A Brief Comment,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 987875 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2007).Google Scholar

Gal, Michal and Rubinfeld, Daniel L.. “The Hidden Costs of Free Goods: Implications for Antitrust Enforcement” (2016) 80, no. 401, Antitrust Law Journal, available at https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2529425.Google Scholar

Gallick, Edward C. and Sisk, David E.. “A Reconsideration of Taxi Regulation” (1987) 3, no. 1, Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 117.Google Scholar

Gallick, Edward C. and Sisk, David E.. “Specialized Assets and Taxi Regulation: An Inquiry into the Possible Efficiency Motivation of Regulation,” Working Paper No. 119 (Washington, DC: Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission, 1984).Google Scholar

Gegax, Douglas and Nowotny, Kenneth. “Competition and the Electric Utility Industry: An Evaluation” (1993) 10, no. 1, Yale Journal on Regulation, available at https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjreg/vol10/iss1/4.Google Scholar

Gibbons, Robert. “Four Formal(izable) Theories of the Firm?” (2005) 58, no. 2, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldberg, Victor P. “Regulation and Administered Contracts” (1976) 7, no. 2, Bell Journal of Economics, 426.Google Scholar

Goolsbee, Austan and Chevalier, Judith. “Measuring Prices and Price Competition Online: Amazon and Barnes and Noble,” NBER Working Papers 9085 (National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc., 2002).Google Scholar

Greenfield, Rebecca. “Why Google Pays Apple $1 Billion a Year”, The Atlantic (February 12, 2013), available at www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/02/why-google-pays-apple-1-billion-year/318451/.Google Scholar

Grossman, Sanford J. and Hart, Oliver D.. “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration” (1986) 94, no. 4. Journal of Political Economy, 691.Google Scholar

Grullon, Gustavo, Larkin, Yelena, and Michaely, Roni. “Are U.S. Industries Becoming More Concentrated?,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2612047 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2018).Google Scholar

Hagiu, Andrei and Wright, Julian. “Marketplace or Reseller?” (2014) 61, no. 1, Management Science, 184.Google Scholar

Hagiu, Andrei and Wright, Julian. “Multi-Sided Platforms,” Working Paper No. 15–037 (Harvard Business School, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hart, Oliver and Moore, John. “Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm” (1990) 98, no. 6, Journal of Political Economy, 1119.Google Scholar

Hart, Oliver and Moore, John. “Contracts as Reference Points” (2008) 123, no. 1, Q J Econ, 1.Google Scholar

Holmstrom, Bengt and Milgrom, Paul. “The Firm as an Incentive System” (1994) 84, no. 4, American Economic Review, 972.Google Scholar

Hoofnagle, Chris Jay and Whittington, Jan. “Free: Accounting for the Costs of the Internet’s Most Popular Price” (2013) 61 UCLA L Rev, 606.Google Scholar

Hu, H., et al. “Toward Scalable Systems for Big Data Analytics: A Technology Tutorial” (2014) 2 IEEE Access, 652.Google Scholar

Hunt, Robert M. “An Introduction to the Economics of Payment Card Networks” (2003) 2, no. 2, Review of Network Economics, available at www.degruyter.com/view/j/rne.2003.2.issue-2/rne.2003.2.2.1020/rne.2003.2.2.1020.xml.Google Scholar

Iacobucci, Edward. “Tying as Quality Control: A Legal and Economic Analysis,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 293602 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2001).Google Scholar

Iacobucci, Edward. “The Superior Propane Saga: The Efficiencies Defence in Canada” in Competition Law Around the World in Fourteen Stories (Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2013).Google Scholar

Iacobucci, Edward and Ducci, Francesco. “The Google Search Case in Europe: Tying and the Single Monopoly Profit Theorem in Two-Sided Markets” (2019) 47, no. 1, European Journal of Law and Economics, 15.Google Scholar

Iacobucci, Edward M. and Trebilcock, Michael J.. “The Design of Regulatory Institutions for the Canadian Telecommunications Sector” (2007) Canadian Public Policy, available at www.utpjournals.press/doi/abs/10.3138/cpp.33.2.127.Google Scholar

Iacobucci, Edward M. and Trebilcock, Michael J..“The Role of Crown Corporations in the Canadian Economy: An Analytical Framework” (2012), available at https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/89449.Google Scholar

Jiang, Yabing. “E-Book Platform Competition in the Presence of Two-Sided Network Externalities,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2164395 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2012).Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul. “Regulation of Natural Monopoly” in Handbook of Law and Economics (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007), p. 1227.Google Scholar

Joskow, Paul. “Incentive Regulation in Theory and Practice: Electricity Distribution and Transmission Networks” in Economic Regulation and Its Reform: What Have We Learned? (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014), p. 291.Google Scholar

Jullien, Bruno. “Competition in Multi-sided Markets: Divide and Conquer” (2011) 3, no. 4, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 186.Google Scholar

Karabarbounis, Loukas and Neiman, Brent. “The Global Decline of the Labor Share” (2014) 129, no. 1, Q J Econ, 61.Google Scholar

Katz, Michael. “Exclusionary Conduct in Multi-Sided Markets” – Note by Michael Katz (OECD, 2017).Google Scholar

Katz, Michael and Sallet, Jonathan, “Multisided Platforms and Antitrust Enforcement (2017) 127 Yale Law Journal, 2142.Google Scholar

Katz, Michael L. and Shapiro, Carl. “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility” (1985) 75, no. 3, American Economic Review, 424.Google Scholar

Khan, Lina M. “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox” (2016) 126 Yale L J, 710.Google Scholar

Kirkwood, John B. “Collusion to Control a Powerful Customer: Amazon, E-Books, and Antitrust Policy” (2014) 69 U Miami L Rev, 1.Google Scholar

Klein, Benjamin, Crawford, Robert G. and Alchian, Armen A.. “Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting Process” (1978) 21, no. 2, Journal of Law and Economics, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lao, Marina. “Networks, Access, and Essential Facilities: From Terminal Railroad to Microsoft” (2009) 62 SMU L Rev, 557.Google Scholar

Lao, Marina. “Search, Essential Facilities, and the Antitrust Duty to Deal” (2012) 11 Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 275.Google Scholar

Lao, Marina. “‘Neutral’ Search as a Basis for Antitrust Action?,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2245295 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2013).Google Scholar

Lee, Robin S. “Vertical Integration and Exclusivity in Platform and Two-Sided Markets” (2013) 103, no. 7, American Economic Review, 2960.Google Scholar

Lefouili, Yassine and Pinho, Joana. “Collusion in Two-Sided Markets,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3049356 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2017).Google Scholar

Lerner, Andres V. “The Role of ‘Big Data’ in Online Platform Competition,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2482780 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2014).Google Scholar

Lipsky, Abbott B. Jr and Gregory Sidak, J. “Essential Facilities” (1998) 51 Stan L Rev, 1187.Google Scholar

Luca, Michael, et al. “Does Google Content Degrade Google Search? Experimental Evidence,” Harvard Business School Working Paper 16–035 (Harvard Business School, 2016).Google Scholar

Luchetta, Giacomo. “Is the Google Platform a Two-Sided Market?” (2014) 10, no. 1, Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 185.Google Scholar

Maurer, Stephen M. and Scotchmer, Suzanne. “The Essential Facilities Doctrine: The Lost Message of Terminal Railroad,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2407071 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2014).Google Scholar

Medvedovsky, Konstantin. “Antitrust Chronicle – Hipster Antitrust” (April 18, 2018), available at Competition Policy International www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/antitrust-chronicle-hipster-antitrust/.Google Scholar

Moore, Adrian T. and Balaker, Ted. “Do Economists Reach a Conclusion on Taxi Deregulation?” (2006) 3, no. 2, Econ J Watch, 109.Google Scholar

Munoz, Cecilia, Smith, Megan, and Patil, D. J.. “Big Data: A Report on Algorithmic Systems,” Opportunity, and Civil Rights, Obama Administration’s Big Data Working Group (Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, 2016).Google Scholar

Naidu, Suresh, Posner, Eric A., and Glen Weyl, E. “Antitrust Remedies for Labor Market Power,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3129221 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2018).Google Scholar

Netter, Jeffry M. and Megginson, William L.. “From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization” (2001) 39, no. 2, Journal of Economic Literature, 321.Google Scholar

Ohlhausen, Maureen K. “Antitrust Enforcement in the Digital Age” (2017) Remarks Before the Global Antitrust Enforcement Symposium Georgetown University.Google Scholar

Pagano, Anthony M. and McKnight, Claire E.. “Economies of Scale in the Taxicab Industry: Some Empirical Evidence from the United States” (1983) 17, no. 3, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 299.Google Scholar

Parker, Geoffrey G. and Van Alstyne, Marshall W.. “Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design” (2005) 51, no. 10, Management Science, 1494.Google Scholar

Pasquale, Frank and Bracha, Oren. “Federal Search Commission? Access, Fairness and Accountability in the Law of Search” (2008) 93 Cornell Law Review, 1149.Google Scholar

Peltzman, Sam. “Toward a More General Theory of Regulation” (1976) 19, no. 2, Journal of Law and Economics, 211.Google Scholar

Pitofsky, Robert, Patterson, Donna, and Hooks, Jonathan. “The Essential Facilities Doctrine Under United States Antitrust Law” (2002) 70 Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works, 443.Google Scholar

Pollock, Rufus. “Is Google the Next Microsoft: Competition, Welfare and Regulation in Online Search” (2010) 9, no. 4, Review of Network Economics, available at www.degruyter.com/view/j/rne.2010.9.issue-4/rne.2010.9.4.1240/rne.2010.9.4.1240.xml.Google Scholar

Posner, Eric A. “Why Uber Will – And Should – Be Regulated” Slate (January 5, 2015), available at: www.law.uchicago.edu/news/eric-posner-why-uber-will-and-should-be-regulated.Google Scholar

Posner, Eric A., Scott Morton, Fiona M., and Weyl, E. Glen. “A Proposal to Limit the Anti-Competitive Power of Institutional Investors,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2872754 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2017).Google Scholar

Posner, Richard. “Natural Monopoly and Its Regulation” (1973) Journal of Reprints for Antitrust Law and Economics, 335.Google Scholar

Rauch, Daniel and Schleicher, David. “Like Uber, But for Local Governmental Policy: The Future of Local Regulation of the “Sharing Economy,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2549919 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2015).Google Scholar

Rochet, Jean-Charles and Tirole, Jean. “An Economic Analysis of the Determination of Interchange Fees in Payment Card Systems” (2003) 2, no. 2, Review of Network Economics, 69.Google Scholar

Rochet, Jean-Charles and Tirole, Jean. “Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets” (2003) 1, no. 4, Journal of the European Economic Association, 990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rochet, Jean-Charles and Tirole, Jean. “Two-Sided Markets: A Progress Report” (2006) 37, no. 3, RAND Journal of Economics, 645.Google Scholar

Rochet, Jean-Charles and Tirole, Jean. “Tying-in Two-Sided Markets and the Honour All Cards Rule,” CEPR Discussion Papers 6132 (2007) C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.Google Scholar

Rohlfs, Jeffrey. “A Theory of Interdependent Demand for a Communications Service” (1974) 5, no. 1, Bell Journal of Economics, 16.Google Scholar

Romanyuk, Gleb and Smolin, Alex. “Cream Skimming and Information Design in Matching Markets,” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, available at www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/mic.20170154.Google Scholar

Rosse, James N. “Daily Newspapers, Monopolistic Competition, and Economies of Scale” (1967) 57, no. 2, American Economic Review, 522.Google Scholar

Ruhmer, Isabel. “Platform Collusion in Two-Sided Markets” (Frankfurt a. M.: Verein für Socialpolitik, 2010).Google Scholar

Rysman, Marc. “Competition Between Networks: A Study of the Market for Yellow Pages” (2004) 71, no. 2, Rev Econ Stud, 483.Google Scholar

Rysman, Marc. “The Economics of Two-Sided Markets” (2009) 23, no. 3, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 125.Google Scholar

Salop, Steven C. “Invigorating Vertical Merger Enforcement,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3052332 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2018).Google Scholar

Shapiro, Carl. “Antitrust in a Time of Populism,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3058345 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2017).Google Scholar

Shapiro, Carl. “Protecting Competition in the American Economy: Merger, Control, Tech Titans, Labour Markets” (2019) 33 Journal of Economic Perspectives, 69.Google Scholar

Shelanski, Howard A. and Gregory Sidak, J. “Antitrust Divestiture in Network Industries” (2001) 68 U Chi L Rev, 1.Google Scholar

Shleifer, Andrei. “State versus Private Ownership” (1998) 12, no. 4, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 133.Google Scholar

Smith, D., Andrew, C, and Trebilcock, Michael J. “State-Owned Enterprises in Less Developed Countries: Privatization and Alternative Reform Strategies” (2001) 12, no. 3, European Journal of Law and Economics, 217.Google Scholar

Stigler, George. “The Theory of Economic Regulation” (1971) 2, no. 1, Bell Journal of Economics, 3.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, Joseph. “Toward a Broader View of Competition Policy” in Competition Policy for the New Era: Insights from the BRICS Countries (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), p. 4.Google Scholar

Stucke, Maurice E. and Ezrachi, Ariel. “When Competition Fails to Optimize Quality: A Look at Search Engines” (2016) 18 Yale JL & Tech, 70.Google Scholar

Stucke, Maurice E. and Grunes, Allen P.. “Debunking the Myths Over Big Data and Antitrust” (2015) Legal Studies Research Paper Series Research Paper, 276 University of Tennessee.Google Scholar

Taplin, Jonathan. “Opinion: Is It Time to Break Up Google?”, New York Times (January 20, 2018), available at www.nytimes.com/2017/04/22/opinion/sunday/is-it-time-to-break-up-google.html.Google Scholar

Thepot, Florence. “Market Power in Online Search and Social Networking: A Matter of Two-Sided Markets” (2013) 36, no. 2, World Competition, 195.Google Scholar

Trebilcock, Michael J. “The Fracturing of the Post-War Free Trade Consensus: The Challenges of Reconstructing a New Consensus,” Paper Delivered at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law (2017).Google Scholar

Tucker, Darren S. and Wellford, Hill. “Big Mistakes Regarding Big Data,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2549044 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2014).Google Scholar

Varian, Hal R. “Economics of Information Technology” (2003) University of California, Berkeley, available at http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/mattioli/mattioli.pdf.Google Scholar

Waller, Spencer and Frischmann, Brett. “Revitalizing Essential Facilities” (2008) 74, no. 1, Faculty Publications & Other Works, available at https://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs/72.Google Scholar

Ward, Patrick “Testing for Multisided Platform Effects in Antitrust Market Definition” (2017) 84 University of Chicago Law Review, 2059.Google Scholar

Werden, Gregory J. “The Law and Economics of the Essential Facility Doctrine” (1987) 32 St Louis U LJ, 433.Google Scholar

Werden, Gregory J.. “Cross-Market Balancing of Competitive Effects: What Is the Law, and What Should It Be” (2017) 43 J Corp L, 119.Google Scholar

Weyl, E. Glen. “A Price Theory of Multi-sided Platforms” (2010) 100, no. 4, American Economic Review, 1642.Google Scholar

Weyl, E. Glen and White, Alexander. “Let the Right ‘One’ Win: Policy Lessons from the New Economics of Platforms” (2014) Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics No. 709–2014.Google Scholar

Wismer, Sebastian and Rasek, Arno. “Market Definition in Multi-sided Markets” – Note by Sebastian Wismer and Arno Rasek, “Hearing on Re-Thinking the Use of Traditional Antitrust Enforcement Tools in Multi-Sided Markets,” DAF/COMP/WD(2017)33/FINAL (2017).Google Scholar

Whinston, Michael. “Tying, Foreclosure, and Exclusion” (1990) 80, no. 4, American Economic Review, 837.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver. “Economies as an Antitrust Defense: The Welfare Tradeoffs” (1968) 58, no. 1, American Economic Review, 18.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver. “The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations” (1971) 61, no. 2, American Economic Review, 112.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver. “Franchise Bidding for Natural Monopolies-in General and with Respect to CATV” (1976) 7, no. 1, Bell Journal of Economics, 73.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver. “Assessing Vertical Market Restrictions: Antitrust Ramifications of the Transaction Cost Approach” (1979) 127, no. 4, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 953.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver. “Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations” (1979) 22, no. 2, Journal of Law and Economics, 233.Google Scholar

Winston, Clifford. “Economic Deregulation: Days of Reckoning for Microeconomists” (1993) 31, no. 3, Journal of Economic Literature, 1263.Google Scholar

Wright, Joshua and John, Yun, “Burdens and Balancing in Multisided Markets: The First Principles Approach of Ohio v. American Express” (forthcoming, 2019) Review of Industrial Organization.Google Scholar

Wu, Tim. “Antitrust via Rulemaking: Competition Catalysts,” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3058114 (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2017).Google Scholar

Wu, Tim. “After Consumer Welfare, Now What? The ‘Protection of Competition’ Standard in Practice” (2018) CPI Antitrust Chronicle, available at www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/CPI-Wu.pdf.Google Scholar

Wu, Tim. “The American Express Opinion, Tech Platforms & the Rule of Reason” (forthcoming, 2018) Journal of Antitrust Enforcement, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3326667.Google Scholar

Zervas, Georgios, Proserpio, Davide, and Byers, John W.. “The Rise of the Sharing Economy: Estimating the Impact of Airbnb on the Hotel Industry” (2017) 54, no. 5, Journal of Marketing Research, 687.Google Scholar

Zhu, Feng and Liu, Quihong. “Competing with Complementors: An Empirical Look at Amazon.com” (2015), available at https://mackinstitute.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Zhu-Feng-Liu-Qihong_Competing-with-Complementors.-An-Empirical-Look-at-Amazon.com_.pdf.Google Scholar

Zingales, Luigi. “Towards a Political Theory of the Firm” (2017) 31, no. 3, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 113.Google Scholar

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, Digital Platforms Inquiry: Final Report (2019).Google Scholar

Autorité de la Concurrence & the Bundeskartellamt. Competition Law and Data (2016).Google Scholar

Bundeskartellamt. Amazon Removes Price Parity Obligation for Retailers on Its Marketplace Platform, Case Report B6-46/12 (2013).Google Scholar

Competition Act, RSC, 1985, c. C. 34.Google Scholar

Competition Bureau of Canada. Big Data and Innovation: Implications for Competition Policy in Canada, Draft for Public Consultation (Gatineau: QC, 2017).Google Scholar

European Commission. Communication from the Commission – Notice – Guidelines on the Application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty (Text with EEA relevance), Guidelines Document 52004XC0427(07) (European Commission, 2004).Google Scholar

European Commission.. Communication from the Commission – Guidance on the Commission’s Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings, Guidance Document OJ C 45, 24.2.2009 (Brussels: European Commission, 2009).Google Scholar

European Commission.. Antitrust: Commission Probes Allegations of Antitrust Violations by Google, Press Release IP/10/1624 (Brussels: European Commission, 2010).Google Scholar

European Commission.. Antitrust: Commission Seeks Feedback on Commitments Offered by Google to Address Competition Concerns, Press Release (Brussels: European Commission, 2013).Google Scholar

European Commission..Antitrust: Commission Opens Formal Investigation Against Google in Relation to Android Mobile Operating System, Fact Sheet Memo/15/4782 (Brussels: European Commission, 2015).Google Scholar

European Commission..Antitrust: Commission Sends Statement of Objections to Google on Comparison Shopping Service, Fact Sheet Memo/15/4781 (Brussels: European Commission, 2015).Google Scholar

European Commission.. Antitrust: Commission Sends Statement of Objections to Google on Comparison Shopping Service; Opens Separate Formal Investigation on Android, Press Release (Brussels: European Commission, 2015).Google Scholar

European Commission..Antitrust: Commission Takes Further Steps in Investigations Alleging Google’s Comparison Shopping and Advertising-Related Practices Breach EU Rules, Press Release (Brussels: European Commission, 2016).Google Scholar

European Commission..Mergers: Commission Alleges Facebook Provided Misleading Information About WhatsApp Takeover, Press Release (Brussels: European Commission, 2016).Google Scholar

European Commission.. Antitrust: Commission Accepts Commitments from Amazon on E-books, Press Release IP/17/1223 (2017).Google Scholar

European Commission.. Mergers: Commission Fines Facebook €110 Million for Providing Misleading Information About WhatsApp Takeover, Press Release (Brussels: European Commission, 2017).Google Scholar

European Commission..Staff Working Document on the Free Flow of Data and Emerging Issues of the European Data Economy, Working Document (Brussels: European Commission, 2017).Google Scholar

European Commission..Competition Policy for the Digital Era, Final Report (April 4, 2019).Google Scholar

European Union. Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) [2016] OJ C202/1.Google Scholar

Federal Trade Commission. FTC Consumer Protection Staff Updates Agency’s Guidance to Search Engine Industry on the Need to Distinguish Between Advertisements and Search Results, Press Release (Washington, D.C., 2013).Google Scholar

Federal Trade Commission. Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or Exclusion? Understanding the Issues, FTC Report (2016).Google Scholar

Ramirez, Edith, Ohlhausen, Maureen K., and McSweeny, Terrell P.. The “Sharing” Economy: Issues Facing Platforms, Participants & Regulators, Federal Trade Commission Staff Report (Federal Trade Commission, 2016).Google Scholar

ILSR Report. Mitchell, Stacy and Olivia, LaVecchia. Report: How Amazon’s Tightening Grip on the Economy Is Stifling Competition, Eroding Jobs, and Threatening Communities (November 29, 2016) Institute for Local Self-Reliance.Google Scholar

OECD. Two Sided Markets. Report and supporting documents (2009).Google Scholar

OECD. Exploring the Economics of Personal Data: A Survey of Methodologies for Measuring Monetary Value. OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 22 (2013).Google Scholar

OECD. Data-Driven Innovation (2015).Google Scholar

OECD. Disruptive Innovations and Their Effect on Competition (2015).Google Scholar

OECD. Big Data: Bringing Competition Policy to the Digital Era (2016).Google Scholar

OECD. Working Party on Measurement and Analysis of the Digital Economy. New Forms of Work in the Digital Economy, Background Report JT03398022 (Committee on Digital Economy Policies CDEP, 2016).Google Scholar

OECD. Rethinking Antitrust Tools for Multi-Sided Platforms (2018).Google Scholar

Price Waterhouse Coopers. The Sharing Economy, Consumer Intelligence Series (2015).Google Scholar

Sherman Act, 1890, USC.Google Scholar

University of Chicago Booth School of Business – George Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, Report by the Committee for the Study of Digital Platforms Market Structure and Antitrust Subcommittee (2019).Google Scholar

UK Report of the Digital Competition Expert Panel, Unlocking Digital Competition (2019).Google Scholar

US Council of Economic Advisers. Benefits of Competition and Indicators of Market Power, Issues Brief (Washington, DC: Obama White House, 2016).Google Scholar