Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:38:48.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Double dividends of additional water charges in South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2013

Pieter J. H. van Beukering
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Elissaios Papyrakis
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Jetske Bouma
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Roy Brouwer
Affiliation:
Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The purpose of this chapter is to show how double dividends could be obtained from using market instruments to tax water use in a developing country. The double dividends are namely environmental (water conservation) on the one hand, and poverty reduction dividends on the other. We apply a water tax on selected industries in South Africa to reduce demand for water, and then transfer the revenue from this tax to the poor to achieve reduction in absolute levels of poverty.

South Africa is classified as a semi-arid country. Precipitation has been fluctuating over the years with an average of 500 mm per annum, well below the world average of about 860 mm (DWAF 2002). The total flow of all the rivers in the country combined amounts to approximately 49 200 million m³ per year, while the National Water Resource Strategy estimated the total water requirement for the year 2000 at 13 280 million m3 per year, excluding environmental requirements. In addition, South Africa is poorly endowed in groundwater as most of the country is underlain by hard rock formations that do not contain any major groundwater aquifers (DWAF 2002).

While currently only about 24% of rural people have access to water on site, additional sources of water supply are environmentally, financially and politically hard to develop. At the same time, unemployment in rural areas of South Africa is extremely high, which results in severe poverty conditions in these areas.

Type
Chapter
Information
Nature's Wealth
The Economics of Ecosystem Services and Poverty
, pp. 315 - 332
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aliber, M. A. (2002). Overview of the incidence of poverty in South Africa for the 10-year review. Unpublished paper commissioned by the President’s office, Human Sciences Research Council, Pretoria.Google Scholar
Bovenberg, A. L. and De Mooij, R. A. (1994). Environmental levies and distortionary taxation. American Economic Review, 84(4): 1085–1089.Google Scholar
CSIR(2001). Water Resource Accounts for South Africa. Report number ENV-P-C 2001–050, Statistics South Africa and The Department of Environment Affairs and Tourism.Google Scholar
Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA)(2000). Environmental Impacts of the Forestry Sector in South Africa with Specific Reference to Water Resources. Midrand, South Africa: Development Bank of Southern Africa.Google Scholar
Department of Minerals and Energy (DME)(2002). Digest of South African Energy Statistics. Compiled by C. J. Cooper. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Minerals and Energy.Google Scholar
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) (1998). National Water Act. Act No 36 of 1998. Pretoria, South Africa: DWAF.Google Scholar
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) (2002). National Water Resource Strategy, 1st edn. Pretoria, South Africa: DWAF.Google Scholar
Du Toit, C. and Koekemoer, R. (2003). A labour model for South Africa. South African Journal of Economics, 71(1): 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fullerton, D. and Metcalf, G. E. (1997). Environmental taxes and the double dividend hypothesis: did you really expect something for nothing? Working Paper No. w6199, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). Available at .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulder, L. H. (1994). Environmental taxation and the ‘double dividend’: a reader’s guide. Working Paper No. w4896, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). Available at .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulder, L. H., Parry, I. W. H. and Burtraw, D. (1997). Revenue-raising versus other approaches to environmental protection: the critical significance of pre-existing tax distortions. The RAND Journal of Economics, 28(4): 708–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, W. J. and Pearson, K. R. (1996). Computing solutions for large general equilibrium models using Gempack. Computational Economics, 9: 83–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horridge, M. (2000). ORANI-G: a general equilibrium model of the Australian economy. CoPS/IMPACT Working Paper Number OP-93.Centre of Policy Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. Available at .Google Scholar
King, N. (2004). The economic value of water in South Africa. In Blignaut, J. and De Wit, M. (eds.), Sustainable OptionsCape Town: UCT Press.Google Scholar
Klasen, J. (2000). Measuring poverty and deprivation in South Africa. Review of Income and Wealth, 46(1): 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Maitre, D. C., Versveld, D. B. and Chapman, R. A. (2000). The impact of invading alien plants on surface water resources in South Africa: a preliminary assessment. WaterSA, 26(3): 397–408.Google Scholar
May, J. (ed.) (2000). Poverty and Inequality in South Africa, Meeting the Challenge. Cape Town and London: David Phillip and Zeb Press.
Pearce, D. W. (1991). The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming. Economic Journal, 101(407): 938–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renzetti, S. (1992). Estimating the structure of industrial water demands: the case of Canadian manufacturing. Land Economics, 68(4): 396–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiner, B. and Van Koppen, B. (2002). Catchment management agencies for poverty eradication in South Africa. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 27: 969–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SSA (Statistics South Africa) (2001). Social Accounting Matrix 1998. Pretoria, South Africa: Statistics South Africa.Google Scholar
Van Heerden, J. H., Gerlagh, R., Blignaut, J. et al. (2006). Searching for triple dividends in South Africa: fighting CO2 pollution and poverty while promoting growth. Energy Journal, 27(2): 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veck, G. A. and Bill, M. R. (2000). Estimation of the residential price elasticity of demand for water by means of a contingent valuation approach. Water Research Commission Report No: 790/1/00, Marlow, UK.Google Scholar
Woolard, I. (2002). An overview of poverty and inequality in South Africa. Working paper, Department for International Development, South Africa. Available at .Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×