Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T14:14:44.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

References

Steven Brakman
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Harry Garretsen
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Charles van Marrewijk
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdel-Rahman, H. M., and Anas, A. (2004), Theories of systems of cities, in Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. IV, Cities and Geography, Amsterdam: North Holland, 2293–340.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. A. (2001), The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation, American Economic Review, 91: 1369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ades, A., and Chua, H. B. (1997), Thy neighbor's curse: regional instability and economic growth, Journal of Economic Growth, 2: 279–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ades, A., and Glaeser, E. L. (1995), Trade and circuses: explaining urban giants, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110: 195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agénor, P. R., and Montiel, P. J. (1996), Development Macroeconomics, Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alcalá, F., and Ciccone, A. (2004), Trade and productivity, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119: 613–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, W. (1964), Location and Land Use, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, A., and Thrift, N. (2000), What kind of economic theory for what kind of economic geography?, Antipode, 32: 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amiti, M., and Cameron, L. (2007), Economic geography and wages, Review of Economics and Statistics, 89: 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amiti, M., and Javorcik, B. S. (2008), Trade costs and location of foreign firms in China, Journal of Development Economics, 85: 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amiti, M., and Wei, S.-J. (2005), Fear of service outsourcing: is it justified?, Economic Policy, 20: 308–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anas, A., Arnott, R., and Small, K. A. (1998), Urban spatial structure, Journal of Economic Literature, 36: 1426–64.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. E. (1979), A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation, American Economic Review, 69: 106–16.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. E., and Wincoop, E. (2003), Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle, American Economic Review, 93: 170–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. E., and Wincoop, E. (2004), Trade costs, Journal of Economics Literature, 42: 691–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, F., and Forslid, R. (2003), Tax competition and economic geography, Journal of Public Economic Theory, 5: 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anselin, L. (1988), Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, H., and Taylor, J. (2000), Regional Economics and Policy, 3rd ed., Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Arnott, R. (2006), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 4: a retrospective, Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 100–4.Google Scholar
Baier, S. L., and Bergstrand, J. H. (2004), Economic determinants of free trade agreements, Journal of International Economics, 64: 29–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baier, S. L., and Bergstrand, J. H. (2007), Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?, Journal of International Economics, 71: 72–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bairoch, P. (1988), Cities and Economic Development: from the Dawn of History to the Present, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Balassa, B. (1965), Trade liberalization and “revealed” comparative advantage, Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 33: 92–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. E. (1999), The Core–Periphery Model with Forward-looking Expectations, Working Paper no. 6921, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. E. (2003), Comment on Crafts and Venables, in Bordo, M. D., Taylor, A. M., and Williamson, J. G. (eds.), Globalization in Historical Perspective, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 364–9.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. E. (2006), Globalisation: The Great Unbundling(s), Geneva: Graduate Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. E., and Forslid, R. (2000), The core–periphery model and endogenous growth: stabilizing and destabilizing integration, Economica, 67: 307–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R., and Forslid, R. (2002), Tax Competition and the Nature of Capital, Discussion Paper no. 3607, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. E., Forslid, R., Martin, P., Ottaviano, G. I. P., and Robert-Nicoud, F. (2003), Economic Geography and Public Policy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. E., and Krugman, P. R. (2004), Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonization, European Economic Review, 48: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. E., and Martin, P. (2004), Agglomeration and regional growth, in Henderson, V. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. IV, Cities and Geography, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2671–712.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. E., Martin, P., and Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2001), Global income divergence, trade and industrialization: the geography of growth take-offs, Journal of Economic Growth, 6: 5–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. E., and Okubo, T. (2006), Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: spatial selection and sorting, Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 323–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. E., and Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2000), Multiproduct multinationals and reciprocal FDI dumping, mimeo, Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva.Google Scholar
Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P., and Pfaffermayr, M. (2007), Estimating models of complex FDI: are there third-country effects?, Journal of Econometrics, 140: 260–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barba Navaretti, G., and Venables, A. J. (2004), Multinational Firms in the World Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barrell, R., and Pain, N. (1999), Domestic institutions, agglomerations and foreign direct investment in Europe, European Economic Review, 43: 925–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R., and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004), Economic Growth, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. (1986), Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare, American Economic Review, 76: 1072–85.Google Scholar
Beardsell, M., and Henderson, J. V. (1999), Spatial evolution of the computer industry in the USA, European Economic Review, 43: 431–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, R., and Henderson, J. V. (2000), Intra-industry specialization and urban development, in Huriot, J. M. and Thisse, J. F. (eds.), The Economics of Cities: Theoretical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 138–66.Google Scholar
Behrens, K., Ertur, C., and Koch, W. (2007), ‘Dual’ Gravity: Using Spatial Econometrics to Control for Multilateral Resistance, Discussion Paper no. 2007/59, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics, Catholic University of Louvain, Belgium.Google Scholar
Behrens, K., Lamorgese, A. R., Ottaviano, G. I. P., Tabuchi, T. (2005), Testing the “Home Market Effect” in a Multi-country World: A Theory-based Approach, Working Paper no. 561, Economic Research Department, Bank of Italy, Rome.Google Scholar
Behrens, K., and Thisse, J. F. (2007), Regional economics: a new economic geography perspective, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37: 457–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrand, J. H. (1985), The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence, Review of Economics and Statistics, 67: 474–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrand, J. H. (1989), The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and factor-proportions theory in international trade, Review of Economics and Statistics, 71: 143–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., and Kostum, S. S. (2003), Plants and productivity in international trade, American Economic Review, 93: 1268–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., and Schott, P. (2007), Firms in international trade, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21: 105–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, C., and Glaeser, E. L. (2005), The divergence of human capital levels across cities, Papers in Regional Science, 84: 407–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, J. N., Panagariya, A., and Srinivasan, T. N. (1998), Lectures on International Trade, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. N., Panagariya, A., and Srinivasan, T. N. (2004), The muddles over outsourcing, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18: 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, D., and Henderson, J. V. (1998), Urban Evolution in the USA, Working Paper no. 98-21, Brown University, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
Black, D., and Henderson, J. V. (1999a), Spatial evolution of population and industry in the United States, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 89: 321–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, D., and Henderson, J. V. (1999b), A theory of urban growth, Journal of Political Economy, 107: 252–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, D., and Henderson, J. V. (2003), Urban evolution in the USA, Journal of Economic Geography, 3: 343–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, M. (1984), Economic Theory in Retrospect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blonigen, B. A., Davies, R. B., Waddell, G. R., and Naughton, H. T. (2007), FDI in space: spatial autoregressive relationships in foreign direct investment, European Economic Review, 51: 1303–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschma, R., and Frenken, K. (2006), Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boschma, R., and Martin, R. (2007), Constructing an evolutionary economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography, 7: 537–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosker, E. M. (2007), Growth, agglomeration and convergence: a space-time analysis for European regions, Spatial Economic Analysis, 2: 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosker, E. M., Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., Jong, H., and Schramm, M. (2008), Ports, plagues, and politics: explaining Italian city growth 1300–1861, European Review of Economic History, 12: 97–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosker, E. M., Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., and Schramm, M. (2007a), Looking for multiple equilibria when geography matters: German city growth and the WWII shock, Journal of Urban Economics, 61: 152–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosker, E. M., Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., and Schramm, M. (2007b), Adding Geography to the New Economic Geography, Working Paper no. 2038, Center for Economic Studies/ifo Institute for Economic Research, Munich.Google Scholar
Bosker, E. M., Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., and Schramm, M. (2008), A century of shocks: the evolution of the German city size distribution 1925–1999, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 38: 330–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosker, E. M., Buringh, E., and Zanden, J. L. (2008), From Baghdad to London: The Dynamics of Urban Growth in Europe and the Arab World, 800–1800, Discussion Paper no. 6833, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
Bosker, E. M., and Garretsen, H. (2006), Economic Development and the Geography of Institutions, Working Paper no. 1769, Center for Economic Studies/ifo Institute for Economic Research, Munich [forthcoming Journal of Economic Geography].Google Scholar
Bosker, E. M., and Garretsen, H. (2007a), Trade Costs, Market Access and Economic Geography: Why the Empirical Specification of Trade Costs Matters, Working Paper no. 2071, Center for Economic Studies/ifo Institute for Economic Research, Munich.Google Scholar
Bosker, E. M., and Garretsen, H. (2007b), Economic Geography and Economic Development in Sub-Saharan Africa, working paper, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Brainard, S. L. (1997), An empirical assessment of the proximity – concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade, American Economic Review, 87: 520–44.Google Scholar
Brakman, S., and Garretsen, H. (1993), The relevance of initial conditions for the German unification, Kyklos, 46: 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., (2008), Foreign Direct Investment and the Multinational Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., Gigengack, R., Marrewijk, C., and Wagenvoort, R. (1996), Negative feedbacks in the economy and industrial location, Journal of Regional Science, 36: 631–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., Gorter, J., Horst, A., and Schramm, M. (2005), New Economic Geography, Empirics and Regional Policy, The Hague: Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., and Schramm, M. (2000), The empirical relevance of the new economic geography: testing for a spatial wage structure in Germany, mimeo, University of Nijmegen/University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., and Schramm, M. (2004a), The spatial distribution of wages: estimating the Helpman – Hanson model for Germany, Journal of Regional Science, 44: 437–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., and Schramm, M. (2004b), The strategic bombing of German cities during WWII and its impact on city growth, Journal of Economic Geography, 4: 201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., and Schramm, M. (2006), Putting new economic geography to the test: freeness of trade and agglomeration in the EU regions, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36: 613–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., and Marrewijk, C. (2001), An Introduction to Geographical Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., and Marrewijk, C. (2007), Agglomeration and aid, in Lahiri, S. (ed.), Theory and Practice of Foreign Aid, vol. I, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 31–53.Google Scholar
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., and Marrewijk, C. (2008), Agglomeration and government spending, in Brakman, S. and Garretsen, H. (eds.), Foreign Direct Investment and the Multinational Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 89–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., Marrewijk, C., and Berg, M. (1999), The return of Zipf; towards a further understanding of the rank-size curve, Journal of Regional Science, 39: 183–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakman, S., and Heijdra, B. J. (eds.) (2004), The Monopolistic Competition Revolution in Retrospect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brakman, S., and Marrewijk, C. (1995), Transfers, returns to scale, tied aid and monopolistic competition, Journal of Development Economics, 47: 333–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakman, S., and Marrewijk, C. (1998), The Economics of International Transfers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakman, S., and Marrewijk, C. (2007), Transfers, non-traded goods, and unemployment: an analysis of the Keynes–Ohlin debate, History of Political Economy, 39: 121–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brakman, S., and Marrewijk, C. (2008), It's a big world after all: on the economic impact of location and distance, Cambridge Journal of the Regions, Economy and Society, 1: 411–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breinlich, H. (2006), The spatial income structure in the European Union: what role for economic geography?, Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 593–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briant, A., Combes, P.-P., and Lafourcade, M. (2007), Does the size and shape of geographical units jeopardize economic geography estimations?, mimeo, University of Aix-Marseille (available at www.vcharite.univ-mrs.fr/pp/combes/).
Brülhart, M. (1998), Economic geography, industry, location and trade: the evidence, World Economy, 21: 775–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brülhart, M. (2001), Evolving geographical concentration of European manufacturing industries, Welwirtschaftliches Archiv, 137: 215–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brülhart, M., Crozet, M., and Koenig, P. (2004), Enlargement and the EU periphery: the impact of changing market potential, World Economy, 27: 853–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brülhart, M., and Traeger, R. (2005), An account of geographic concentration patterns in Europe, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35: 597–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brülhart, M., and Trionfetti, F. (1999), Home-biased demand and international specialisation: a test of trade theories, mimeo, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, London.Google Scholar
Bucovetsky, S. (1991), Asymmetric tax competition, Journal of Urban Economics, 30: 167–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, G. (1982), National city-size distributions: what do we know after 67 years of research?, Progress in Human Geography, 6: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, P. C., and Carbonaro, G. (1995), Convergence–divergence in regional growth rates: an empty black box?, in Armstrong, H. and Vickerman, R. (eds.), Convergence and Divergence among European Regions, London: Pion, 89–111.Google Scholar
Christaller, W. (1933), Central Places in Southern Germany (trans. Baskin, C. W.), London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ciccone, A. (2002), Agglomeration effects in Europe, European Economic Review, 46: 213–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciccone, A., and Hall, R. E. (1996), Productivity and the density of economic activity, American Economic Review, 86: 54–70.Google Scholar
Clark, G. L. (1998), Stylized facts and close dialogue: methodology in economic geography, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88: 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., and Gertler, M. S. (eds.) (2000), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coe, D. T., and Helpman, E. (1995), International R&D spillovers, European Economic Review, 39: 859–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, D. T., Helpman, E., and Hoffmaister, A. W. (1997), North–South R&D spillovers, Economic Journal, 107: 134–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combes, P.-P., Duranton, G., and Gobillon, L. (2008), Spatial wage disparities: sorting matters!, Journal of Urban Economics 63: 723–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combes, P.-P., Duranton, G., Gobillon, L., Puga, D., and Roux, S. (2008), The productivity advantages of large markets: distinguishing agglomeration from firm selection, mimeo, Groupement de Recherche en Economic Quantitative d'Aix Marseille.
Combes, P.-P., Duranton, G., Gobillon, L., and Roux, S. (2007), Estimating agglomeration effects: does playing with different instruments give a consistent tune?, mimeo, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Combes, P.-P., Duranton, G., and Overman, H. (2005), Agglomeration and the adjustment of the spatial economy, Papers in Regional Science, 84: 311–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combes, P.-P., Mayer, T., and Thisse, J.-F. (2006), Economic Geography [in French], Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Combes, P. P., Mayer, T., and Thisse, J-F. (2008), Economic Geography, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Combes, P.-P., and Overman, H. G. (2004), The spatial distribution of economic activities in the EU, in Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics vol. IV, Cities and Geography, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2845–911.Google Scholar
Copus, A. K. (1999), A New Peripherality Index for the NUTS III Regions of the European Union, ERDF Study no. 98/00/27/130, Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy.Google Scholar
Córdoba, J.-C. (2008), On the distribution of city sizes, Journal of Urban Economics, 63: 177–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courant, P. N., and Deardorff, A. V. (1992), International trade with lumpy countries, Journal of Political Economy, 100: 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R., and Venables, A. J. (2003), Globalization in history: a geographical perspective, in Bordo, M. D., Taylor, A. M., and Williamson, J. G. (eds.), Globalization in Historical Perspective, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 323–64.Google Scholar
Crozet, M. (2004), Do migrants follow market potentials? An estimation of a new economic geography model, Journal of Economic Geography, 4: 439–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozet, M., and Trionfetti, F. (2007), Trade Costs and the Home Market Effect, Working Paper no. 2007–05, CEPII Research Center, Paris.Google Scholar
Currie, M., and Kubin, I. (2006), Chaos in the core–periphery model, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 60: 252–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, P. (1985), Clio and the econometrics of QWERTY, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 75: 332–7.Google Scholar
Davis, D. R. (1995), Intra-industry trade: a Hechscher–Ohlin–Ricardo approach, Journal of International Economics, 39: 201–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. R. (1998), The home market, trade and industrial structure, American Economic Review, 88: 1264–77.Google Scholar
Davis, D. R., and Weinstein, D. E. (1996), Does economic geography matter for international specialization?, mimeo, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. R., and Weinstein, D. E. (1997), Increasing returns and international trade: an empirical confirmation, mimeo, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Davis, D. R., and Weinstein, D. E. (1998) Market Access, Economic Geography and Comparative Advantage: An Empirical Assessment, Discussion Paper no. 1850, Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. R., and Weinstein, D. E. (1999), Economic geography and regional production structure: an empirical investigation, European Economic Review, 43: 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. R., and Weinstein, D. E. (2001), An account of global factor trade, American Economic Review, 91: 1423–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. R., and Weinstein, D. E. (2002), Bones, bombs and breakpoints: the geography of economic activity, American Economic Review, 92: 1269–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. R., and Weinstein, D. E. (2003), Market access, economic geography and comparative advantage: an empirical assessment, Journal of International Economics, 59: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. R., and Weinstein, D. E. (2008), A search for multiple equilibria in urban industrial structure, Journal of Regional Science, 48: 29–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaal, A., and Berg, M. (1999), Producer services, economic geography and service tradability, Journal of Regional Science, 39: 539–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deardorff, A. V. (1998), Determinants of bilateral trade: does gravity work in a neoclassical world?, in Frankel, J. A. (ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 7–32.Google Scholar
DeLong, J. B. (1988), Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: comment, American Economic Review, 78: 1138–54.Google Scholar
Devereux, M., Griffith, R., and Klemm, A. (2002), Corporate income tax reforms and international tax competition, Economic Policy, 35: 449–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. (1997), Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Dicken, P., and Lloyd, P. E. (1980), Location in Space, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Disdier, A.-C., and Head, K. (2008), The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade, Review of Economics and Statistics, 90: 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A. (2004), Some reflections on theories and applications of monopolistic competition, in Brakman, S. and Heijdra, B. (eds.), The Monopolistic Competition Revolution in Retrospect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 123–33.Google Scholar
Dixit, A., and Norman, V. (1980), Theory of International Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A., and Stiglitz, J. E. (1977), Monopolistic competition and optimal product diversity, American Economic Review, 67: 297–308.Google Scholar
Dobkins, L. H., and Ioannides, Y. M. (2000), Dynamic evolution of US city size distributions, in Huriot, J.-M. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), The Economics of Cities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 217–60.Google Scholar
Dobkins, L. H., and Ioannides, Y. M. (2001), Spatial interactions among US cities, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 31: 701–31.Google Scholar
Dumais, G., Ellison, G., and Glaeser, E. L. (1997), Geographic Concentration as a Dynamic Process, Working Paper no. 6270, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J. H. (1977), Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: a search for an eclectic approach, in Ohlin, B., Hesselborn, P. O., and Wijkman, P. M. (eds.), The International Allocation of Economic Activity, London: Macmillan, 395–418.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H. (1981), International Production and the Multinational Enterprise, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Duranton, G. (2006), Some foundations for Zipf's law: product proliferation and local spillovers, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36: 543–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranton, G. (2007), California dreamin': the feeble case for cluster policies, mimeo, University of Toronto (available at http://individual.utoronto.ca/gilles/research.html).Google Scholar
Duranton, G. (2008), Spatial economics, in Durlauf, S. N. and Blume, L. E. (eds.), New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, (2nd ed.), New York: Palgrave Macmillan, S1–S10.Google Scholar
Duranton, G., and Overman, H. G. (2005), Testing or localization using micro-geographic data, Review of Economic Studies, 72: 1077–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranton, G., and Overman, H. G. (2008), Exploring the detailed location patterns of UK manufacturing industries using microgeographic data, Journal of Regional Science, 48: 213–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranton, G., and Puga, D. (2004), Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies, in Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics vol. IV Cities and Geography, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2063–118.Google Scholar
Duranton, G., and Rodriguez-Posé, A. (2005), When economists and geographers collide, or the tale of the lions and the butterflies, Environment and Planning, A, 37: 1695–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranton, G., and Storper, M. (2006), Agglomeration and growth: a dialogue between economists and geographers, Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duro, J. A. (2001), Regional Income Inequalities in Europe: An Updated Measurement and Some Decomposition Results, working paper, Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica, Barcelona.
Dymski, G. (1998), On Paul Krugman's model of economic geography, Geoforum, 27: 439–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, W., and Levine, R. (1998), Trouble with the neighbours: Africa's problem, Africa's opportunity, Journal of African Economics, 7: 120–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, W., and Levine, R. (2003), Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50: 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, B. C., and Lipsey, R. G. (1982), An economic theory of central places, Economic Journal, 92: 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, J., and Eckstein, Z. (1997), Cities and growth: theory and evidence from France and Japan, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 27: 443–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, J., and Kortum, S. (1996), Trade in ideas patenting and productivity in the OECD, Journal of International Economics, 40: 251–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eeckhout, J. (2004), Gibrat's law for all cities, American Economic Review, 94: 1429–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekholm, K., and Forslid, R. (2001), Trade and location with horizontal and vertical multi-region firms, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 103: 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekholm, K., Forslid, R., and Markusen, J. R. (2007), Export-platform foreign direct investment, Journal of the European Economic Association, 5: 776–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, G., and Glaeser, E. L. (1997), Geographic concentration in US manufacturing industries: a dartboard approach, Journal of Political Economy, 105: 889–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, G., and Glaeser, E. L. (1999), The geographic concentration of industry: does natural advantage explain agglomeration?, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 89: 311–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, C., and Rogers, J. H. (1996), How wide is the border?, American Economic Review, 86: 1112–25.Google Scholar
Ethier, W. J., and Horn, H. (1984), A new look at economic integration, in Kierzkowski, H. (ed.), Monopolistic Competition and International Trade, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 207–29.Google Scholar
Feenstra, R. C. (2004), Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fingleton, B. (2004), Some alternative geo-economics for Europe's regions, Journal of Economic Geography, 4: 389–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fingleton, B. (2005), Beyond neoclassical orthodoxy: a view based on the new economic geography and UK regional wage data, Papers in Regional Science, 84: 351–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fingleton, B. (2006), The new economic geography versus urban economics: an evaluation using local wage rates in Great Britain, Oxford Economic Papers, 58: 501–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florida, R. (2002), The Rise of the Creative Class … and How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Florida, R. (2004), Reaction to Glaeser's review of The Rise of the Creative Class, see www.creativeclass.com.
Florida, R. (2006), The Flight of the Creative Class, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Forslid, R., Haaland, J. I., and Knarvik, K. H. Midelfart (2002), A U-shaped Europe? A simulation study of industrial location, Journal of International Economics, 57: 273–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forslid, R., and Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2003), An analytically solvable core–periphery model, Journal of Economic Geography, 3: 229–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. S. (2007), Taking geographical economics out of equilibrium: implications for theory and policy, Journal of Economic Geography, 7: 265–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, J. A., and Romer, D. (1999), Does trade cause growth?, American Economic Review, 89: 379–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenken, K., and Boschma, R. A. (2007), A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process, Journal of Economic Geography, 7: 635–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, T. (2005), The World Is Flat, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Fujita, M. (1989), Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, M., Krugman, P. R., and Mori, T. (1999), On the evolution of hierarchial urban systems, European Economic Review, 43: 209–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, M., Krugman, P. R., and Venables, A. J. (1999), The Spatial Economy; Cities, Regions, and International Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fujita, M., and Mori, T. (1996), The role of ports in the making of major cities: self-agglomeration and the hub effect, Journal of Development Economics, 49: 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, M., and Mori, T. (2005), Frontiers of the new economic geography, Papers in Regional Science, 84: 377–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, M., Mori, T., Henderson, J. V., and Kanemoto, Y. (2004), Spatial distribution of economic activities in Japan and China, in Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. IV, Cities and Geography, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2911–80.Google Scholar
Fujita, M., and Thisse, J.-F. (1996), Economics of Agglomeration, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10: 339–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, M., and Thisse, J.-F. (2000), The formation of economic agglomerations: old problems and new perspectives, in Huriot, J.-M. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), Economics of Cities: Theoretical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–73 [extended version of Fujita and Thisse, 1996].Google Scholar
Fujita, M., and Thisse, J.-F. (2002), Economics of Agglomeration: Cities, Regions, and International Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaix, X. (1999a), Zipf's law and the growth of cities, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 89: 129–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaix, X. (1999b), Zipf's Law for cities: an explanation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114: 739–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaix, X., and Ibragimov, R. (2007), Rank-1/2: A Simple Way to Improve the OLS Estimation of Tail Exponents, Technical Working Paper no. 342, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabaix, X., and Ioannides, Y. M. (2004), The evolution of city size distributions, in Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), The Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics, vol. IV, Cities and Geography, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2341–80.Google Scholar
Gallup, J. L., Sachs, J. D., and Mellinger, A. D. (1998), Geography and Economic Development, Working Paper no. 6849, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, T. (1999), Economic geography and the department of vertical multinational production, Journal of International Economics, 48: 301–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garretsen, H., and Peeters, J. (2007), Capital mobility, agglomeration and corporate tax rates: is the race to the bottom for real?, CESifo Economic Studies, 53: 263–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garretsen, H., and Peeters, J. (2008), FDI and the Relevance of Spatial Linkages: Do Third-country Effects Matter for Dutch FDI?, CESifo, Working Paper, no. 2191, Center for Economic Studies/ifo Insitute for Economic Research, Munich [forthcoming Review of World Economics].Google Scholar
Glaeser, E. L. (2000), The new economics of urban and regional growth, in Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., and Gertler, M. S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 83–99.Google Scholar
Glaeser, E. L. (2004), Book review of Richard Florida's “The Rise of the Creative Class,” mimeo, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA (available at www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/glaeser/files/Review_Florida.pdf).Google Scholar
Glaeser, E. L. (2005), Reinventing Boston 1630–2003, Journal of Economic Geography, 5: 119–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E. L. (2007), The economic approach to cities, mimeo, Department of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J., and Schleifer, A. (1992), Growth in cities, Journal of Political Economy, 100: 1126–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E. L., and Kohlhase, J. E. (2004), Cities, regions and the decline of transport costs, Papers in Regional Science, 83: 197–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E. L., Kolko, J., and Saiz, A. (2001), Consumer city, Journal of Economic Geography, 1: 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E. L., Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (2004), Do institutions cause growth?, Journal of Economic Growth, 9: 271–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E. L., and Shapiro, J. M. (2002), Cities and warfare, Journal of Urban Economics, 51: 205–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorter, J. (2002), The economic geography of Europe, CPB Report, 2002/4: 22–8.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, P., Bohn, R., and McKendrick, D. (2000), Globalization of production: insights from the hard disk drive industry, World Development, 28: 301–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. M., and Helpman, E. (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haaland, J. I., Kind, H. J., Knarvik, K. H. Midelfart, and Torstensson, J. (1999), What Determines the Economic Geography of Europe?, Discussion Paper no. 2072, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
Hall, R., and Jones, C. I. (1999), Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114: 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallet, M. (2000), Regional Specialisation and Concentration in the EU, Economic Paper no. 141, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
Hanoch, G. (1975), The elasticity of scale and the shapes of average costs, American Economic Review, 65: 492–7.Google Scholar
Hanson, G. H. (1996), Economic integration, intra-industry trade, and frontier regions, European Economic Review, 40: 941–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, G. H. (1997), Increasing returns, trade and the regional structure of wages, Economic Journal, 107: 113–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, G. H. (2000), Scale Economies and the Geographic Concentration of Industry, Working Paper no. 8013, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, G. H. (2005), Market potential, increasing returns, and geographic concentration, Journal of International Economics, 67: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrigan, J. (1994), Scale economies and the volume of trade, Review of Economics and Statistics, 76: 321–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrigan, J. (1995), Factor endowments and the international location of production, Journal of International Economics, 39: 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. (1954), The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 64: 315–48.Google Scholar
Harris, T. F., and Ioannides, Y. M. (2000), History versus Expectations: An Empirical Investigation, Discussion Paper no. 2000–14, Department of Economics, Tufts University, Medford, MA.Google Scholar
Head, K., and Mayer, T. (2004a), The empirics of agglomeration and trade, in Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. IV, Cities and Geography, Amsterdam: North Holland, 2609–65.Google Scholar
Head, K., and Mayer, T. (2004b), Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union, Review of Economics and Statistics, 86: 959–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, K., and Mayer, T., (2006), Regional wage and employment responses to market potential in the EU, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36: 573–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, K., and Ries, J. (2001), Increasing returns versus national product differentiation as an explanation for the pattern of US–Canada trade, American Economic Review, 91: 858–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, K., Ries, J., and Swenson, D. (1995), Agglomeration benefits and location choice: evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United States, Journal of International Economics, 38: 223–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, E. (1984a), A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations, Journal of Political Economy, 92: 451–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, E. (1984b), Increasing returns, imperfect markets and trade theory, in Jones, R. W. and Kenen, P. B. (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, vol. I, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 325–65.Google Scholar
Helpman, E. (1998), The size of regions, in Pines, D., Sadka, E., and Zilcha, I. (eds.), Topics in Public Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 33–54.Google Scholar
Helpman, E. (2004), The Mystery of Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Helpman, E. (2006), Trade, FDI and the organization of firms, Journal of Economic Literature, 44: 589–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, E., and Krugman, P. R. (1985), Market Structure and Foreign Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., and Rubinstein, Y. (2007), Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes, Working Paper no. 12927, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., and Yeaple, S. (2004), Exports versus FDI with heterogeneous firms, American Economic Review, 94: 300–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. V. (1974), The sizes and types of cities, American Economic Review, 64: 640–56.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. V. (1977), Economic Theory and the Cities, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. V. (1988), Urban Development: Theory, Fact and Illusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. V. (2000), The monopolistic competition model in urban economic geography, paper presented at the seminar “The Monopolistic Competition Revolution after 25 Years,” University of Groningen, October 30.
Henderson, J. V. (2003), The urbanization process and economic growth: the so-what question, Journal of Economic Growth, 8: 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. V., Kuncoro, A., and Turner, M. (1995), Industrial development in cities, Journal of Political Economy, 103: 1067–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. V., Shalizi, Z., and Venables, A. J. (2000), Geography and development, mimeo, London School of Economics.
Henderson, J. V., Shalizi, Z., and Venables, A. J., (2001), Geography and development, Journal of Economic Geography, 1: 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. V., and Thisse, J.-F. (2004), The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. IV, Cities and Geography, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Herfindahl, O. C. (1950), Concentration in the steel industry, unpublished PhD. dissertation, Columbia University, NY.
Hering, S., and Poncet, L. (2006), Market Access Impact on Individual Wages: Evidence from China, Working Paper no. 2006–23, Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales, Paris [forthcoming Review of Economics and Statistics].Google Scholar
Hering, S., and Poncet, L (2007), Economic geography, spatial dependence and income inequality in China, mimeo, University of Paris I.Google Scholar
Hill, B. M. (1975), A simple approach to inference about the tail of a distribution, Annals of Statistics, 3: 1163–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinloopen, J., and Marrewijk, C. (2005), Locating economic concentration, in Brakman, S. and Garretsen, H. (eds.), Location and Competition, London: Routledge, 1–31.Google Scholar
Hinloopen, J., and Marrewijk, C. (2006), Comparative Advantage, the Rank-size Rule, and Zipf's Law, Discussion Paper no. 06-100/1, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. (1958), Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, T. J. (1999), Scale of local production and city size, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 89: 317–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, T. J., and Stevens, J. J. (2004), Spatial distribution of economic activities in North America, in Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. IV, Cities and Geography, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2797–844.Google Scholar
Hoover, E. M. (1948), The Location of Economic Activity, New York: McGraw.Google Scholar
Horstman, I. J., and Markusen, J. R. (1986), Up the average cost curve: inefficient entry and the new protectionism, Journal of International Economics, 20: 225–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huizinga, H., and Nicodème, G. (2003), Foreign Ownership and Corporate Income Taxation: An Empirical Evaluation, Discussion Paper no. 3952, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
Hummels, D. (1999a), Towards a geography of trade costs, mimeo, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Hummels, D. (1999b), Have international transportation costs declined?, mimeo, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Huriot, J.-M., and Thisse, J.-F. (2000), The Economics of Cities: Theoretical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
,IMF (2003), World Economic Outlook, April 2003: Growth and Institutions, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Inui, T., Matsuura, T., and Poncet, S. (2007), The location of Japanese MNCs affiliates: agglomeration, spillovers and firm heterogeneity, mimeo, Paris University 1.Google Scholar
Isard, W. (1956), Location and Space Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Isard, W. (1960), Methods of Regional Analysis, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. (1969), The Economy of Cities, New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Kaldor, N. (1940), A model of the trade cycle, Economic Journal, 50: 78–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, D., Kraay, A., and Mastruzi, M. (2005), Governance Matters V: Governance Indicators for 1996–2005, Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenen, P. B. (1965), Nature, capital, and trade, Journal of Political Economy, 73: 437–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kind, H., Midelfart Knarvik, K. H., and Schjelderup, G. (2000), Competing for capital in a “lumpy” world, Journal of Public Economics, 78: 253–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knaap, T., (2006), Trade, location, and wages in the United States, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 36: 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kooij, P. (1988), Peripheral cities and their regions in the Dutch urban system until 1900, Journal of Economic History, 48: 357–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopmans, T. C. (1957), Three Essays on the State of Economic Science, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kratz, M., and Resnick, S. I. (1996), The QQ-estimator and heavy tails, Communications in Statistics: Stochastic Models, 12: 699–724.Google Scholar
Krogstrup, S. (2004), Are Corporate Tax Burdens Racing to the Bottom in the European Union? Working Paper no. 04-04, Economic Policy Research Unit University of ‘Copenhagen.
Krugman, P. R. (1979), Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade, Journal of International Economics, 9: 469–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1980), Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade, American Economic Review, 70: 950–9.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1991a), Increasing returns and economic geography, Journal of Political Economy, 99: 483–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1991b), Geography and Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1991c), History versus expectations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106: 651–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1993a), Lessons from Massachusetts for EMU, in Torres, F. and Giavazzi, F. (eds.), Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 241–69.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1993b), On the number and location of cities, European Economic Review, 37: 293–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P.R (1993), Lessons from Massachusetts for EMU, in Torres, F. and Giavazzi, F. (eds.), Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 241–69.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1993b), On the number and location of cities, European Economic Review, 37: 293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1995a), Development, Geography and Economic Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1995b), Increasing returns, imperfect competition and the positive theory of international trade, in Grossman, G. M. and Rogoff, K. (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, vol. III, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1243–77.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1996a), The Self-organizing Economy, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1996b), Confronting the mystery of urban hierarchy, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10: 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1998), Space: the final frontier, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12: 161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. R. (1999), Was it all in Ohlin?, mimeo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (available at http://web.mit.edu/krugman/www.ohlin.html).Google Scholar
Krugman, P. (2000), Where in the world is the new economic geography?, in Clark, G. L., Feldman, M., and Gertler, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 49–60.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R., and Livas Elizondo, R. (1996), Trade policy and Third World metropolis, Journal of Development Economics, 49: 137–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. R., and Obstfeld, M. (1994), International Economics: Theory and Policy, 3rd ed., Glasgow: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R., and Obstfeld, M. (2000), International Economics: Theory and Policy, 5th edn., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R., and Venables, A. J. (1990), Integration and the competitiveness of peripheral industry, in Bliss, C. and Macedo, J. Braga (eds.), Unity with Diversity in the European Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–75.Google Scholar
Krugman, P. R., and Venables, A. J. (1995), Globalization and the inequality of nations, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110: 857–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launhardt, W. (1885), Mathematische Begründung der Volkswirtschaftslehre, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Leamer, E. E. (2007), A flat world, a level playing field, a small world after all, or none of the above: a review of Thomas L. Friedman'sThe World Is Flat, Journal of Economic Literature, 45: 83–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leamer, E. E., and Levinsohn, J. (1995), International trade theory: the evidence, in Grossman, G. M. and Rogoff, K. (eds.), Handbook of International Economics, vol. III, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 269–87.Google Scholar
Leamer, E. E., and Storper, M. (2001), The Geography of the Internet Age, Working Paper no. 8450, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontief, W. (1936), A note on the pure theory of transfers, in Explorations in Economics: Notes and Essays Contributed in Honor of F. W. Taussig, New York: McGraw-Hill, 84–92.Google Scholar
Limao, N., and Venables, A. J. (2000), Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage and transport costs, mimeo, World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Linnemann, H. (1966), An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Lösch, A. (1940), The Economics of Location (trans. Woglom, W. H. and Stolper, W. F.), New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. (1988), On the mechanisms of economic development, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22: 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. (2006), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. 4: theory and observation, Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 110–12.Google Scholar
Ludema, R., and Wooton, I. (2000), Economic geography and the fiscal effects of regional integration, Journal of International Economics, 52: 331–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, A. (2003), The World Economy: Historical Statistics, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, A. (2007), Contours of the World Economy 1–2030 AD: Essays in Macroeconomic History, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Magrini, S. (2004), Spatial distribution of economic activities in North America, in Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. IV, Cities and Geography, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2741–96.Google Scholar
Malanima, P. (1998), Italian cities 1300–1800: a quantitative approach, Rivista di Storia Economica, 14: 91–126.Google Scholar
Malanima, P. (2005), Urbanisation and the Italian economy during the last millennium, European Review of Economic History, 9: 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchioni, C. (2004), Geographical economics versus economic geography: towards a clarification of the dispute, Environment and Planning, A, 36: 1737–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markusen, A. (2003), Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies, Regional Studies, 37: 701–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markusen, J. R. (2002), Multinational Firms and the Theory of International Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Markusen, J. R., and Maskus, K. E. (1999), Multinational Firms: Reconciling Theory and Evidence, Working Paper no. 7163, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markusen, J. R., and Venables, A. J. (1998), Multinational firms and the new trade theory, Journal of International Economics, 46: 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markusen, J., and Venables, A. (2007), Interacting factor endowments and trade costs; a multi-country, multi-good approach to trade theory, Journal of International Economics, 73: 333–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlet, G. A., and Woerkens, C. M. (2007), The Dutch creative class and how it fosters urban employment growth, Urban Studies, 44: 2605–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P., and Ottaviano, G. I. P. (1999), Growing locations in a model of endogenous growth, European Economic Review, 43: 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. (1999), The new “geographical turn” in economics: some critical reflections, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23: 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. (2001), EMU versus the regions? Regional convergence and divergence in Euroland, Journal of Economic Geography, 1: 51–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R. (2008), The “New Economic Geography”: credible models of the economic landscape?, in Lee, R., Leyshon, A., McDowell, L. and Sunley, P. (eds.), A Compendium of Economic Geography, London: Sage.Google Scholar
Martin, R., and Sunley, P. (1996), Paul Krugman's geographical economics and its implications for regional development theory: a critical assessment, Economic Geography, 72: 259–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R., and Sunley, P. (2001), Rethinking the “economic” in economic geography: broadening our vision or losing our focus?, Antipode, 33: 148–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P., and Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2001), Rethinking the “economic” in economic geography: broadening our vision or losing our focus?, Antipode, 33: 148–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R., and Sunley, P. (2003), Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea, Journal of Economic Geography, 3: 5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, R., and Sunley, P. (2006), Path dependence and regional economic evolution, Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 395–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCallum, J. (1995), National borders matter: Canada–US regional trade patterns, American Economic Review, 85: 615–23.Google Scholar
McCann, P. (2002), Urban and Regional Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Melitz, M. J. (2003), The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocation and aggregate industry productivity, Econometrica, 71: 1695–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melitz, M. J., and Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2005), Market Size, Trade and Productivity, Working Paper no. 11393, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellinger, A. D., Sachs, J. D., and Gallup, J. L. (2000), Climate, coastal proximity and development, in Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., and Gertler, M. S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 169–94.Google Scholar
Midelfart Knarvik, K. H., Overman, H. G., Redding, S. J., and Venables, A. J. (2000), The Location of European Industry, Economic Paper no. 142, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
Midelvart-Knarvik, K. H., Overman, H. G., Redding, S. J., and Venables, A. J. (2002), Integration and industrial specialisation in the European Union, Revue Economiques, 53: 469–81.Google Scholar
Midelvart-Knarvik, K. H., Overman, H. G., Redding, S. J., and Venables, A. J. (2003), The location of European industry, in Dierx, A., Ilzkovitz, F., and Sekkat, K. (eds.), European Integration and the Functioning of Product Markets, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, Chap. 5.Google Scholar
Midelfart Knarvik, K. H., Overman, H. G, and Venables, A. J. (2001), Comparative advantage and economic geography: estimating the determinants of industrial location in the EU, mimeo, London School of Economics/University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Midelfart-Knarvik, K.-H., Overman, H. G, and Venables, A. J. (2003), Monetary union and the economic geography of Europe, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41: 847–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miguel, E., and Roland, G. (2005), The long run impact of bombing Vietnam, mimeo, University of California, Berkeley (available at http://elsa.berkeley.edu/∼emiguel/research2.shtml).Google Scholar
Milanovic, B. (2006a), Economic integration and income convergence: not such a strong link?, Review of Economics and Statistics, 88: 659–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, B. (2006b), Global Income Inequality: What It Is and Why It Matters, Policy Research Working Paper no. 3865, World Bank, Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, E. S. (1967), An aggregate model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area, American Economic Review, 57: 197–210.Google Scholar
,Ministry of Economic Affairs (1999), Location Patterns of Leading Companies in North-west Europe, The Hague: Ministry of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
Mion, G. (2004), Spatial externalities and empirical analysis: the case of Italy, Journal of Urban Economics, 56: 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, E. (2004), Human capital externalities in cities, in Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J. -F. (eds.), The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. IV, Cities and Geography, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2243–92.Google Scholar
Mulligan, G. F. (1984), Agglomeration and central place theory: a review of the literature, International Regional Science Review, 9: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mundell, R. A. (1957), International trade and factor mobility, American Economic Review, 47: 321–35.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J. C., and Sandler, T. (2002), Economic growth, civil wars and spatial spillovers, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46: 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1989), Industrialization and the big push, Journal of Political Economy, 97: 1003–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muth, R. (1969), Cities and Housing, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Myrdal, G. (1957), Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Neary, J. P. (2001), Of hype and hyperbolas: introducing the new economic geography, Journal of Economic Literature, 39: 536–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neary, J. P. (2004), Monopolistic competition and international trade theory, in Brakman, S. and Heijdra, B. J. (eds.), The Monopolistic Competition Revolution in Retrospect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159–84.Google Scholar
Neary, P. J. (2006), Review of Economic Geography and Public Policy, Journal of International Economics, 70: 503–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neary, P. J. (2007), Cross-border mergers as instruments of comparative advantage, Review of Economic Studies, 74: 1229–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neary, P. (2008), Trade costs and foreign direct investment, in Brakman, S. and Garretsen, H. (eds.), Foreign Direct Investment and the Multinational Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 13–38.Google Scholar
Neven, D., and Gouyette, C. (1995), Regional convergence in the European community, Journal of Common Market Studies, 33: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijkamp, P. (2000), Review of The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions and International Trade, Economic Journal, 111: F166.Google Scholar
Nijkamp, P., and Mills, E. S. (eds.) (1986), The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. I, Regional Economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Nitsch, V. (2003), Does history matter for urban primacy? The case of Vienna, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 33: 401–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitsch, V. (2005), Zipf zipped, Journal of Urban Economics, 57: 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, N., and Puga, D. (2007), Ruggedness: The Blessing of Bad Geography in Africa, Discussion Paper no. 6253, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, M., and Rogoff, K. (1996), Foundations of International Macroeconomics, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
,OECD (2003), Trends in International Migration, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
Ohlin, B. (1933), Interregional and International Trade, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, K., and Williamson, J. (1999), Globalization and History, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2003), Regional policy in the global economy: insights from the New Economic Geography, Regional Studies, 37: 665–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2007), Models of “new economic geography”: factor mobility vs. vertical linkages, in Fingleton, B. (ed.), New Directions in Economic Geography, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 53–69.Google Scholar
Ottaviano, G. I. P., and Puga, D. (1997), Agglomeration in the Global Economy: A Survey of the “New Economic Geography,” Discussion Paper no. 356, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
Ottaviano, G. I. P., and Robert-Nicoud, F. (2006), The “genome” of NEG models with vertical linkages: a positive and normative synthesis, Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 113–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottaviano, G. I.P., Tabuchi, T., and Thisse, J.-F. (2002), Agglomeration and trade revisited, International Economic Review, 43: 409–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottaviano, G. I. P., and Thisse, J.-F. (2004), Agglomeration and economic geography, in Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. IV, Cities and Geography, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2563–608.Google Scholar
Overman, H. G. (2004), Can we learn anything from economic geography proper?, Journal of Economic Geography, 4: 501–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overman, H. G., Redding, S. J., and Venables, A. J. (2003), The economic geography of trade, production and income: a survey of the empirics, in Harrigan, J. and Choi, K. (eds.), Handbook of International Trade, London: Blackwell, 353–87.Google Scholar
Parr, J. B. (1985), A note on the size distribution of cities over time, Journal of Urban Economics, 18: 199–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peck, J. (2000), Doing regulation, in Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., and Gertler, M. S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 61–83.Google Scholar
Peeters, J. J. W., and Garretsen, H. (2004), Globalisation, wages and unemployment: an economic geography perspective, in Brakman, S. and Heijdra, B. (eds.), The Monopolistic Competition Revolution in Retrospect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 236–61.Google Scholar
Perroux, F. (1955), Note sur la notion de pole de croissance, Economique Appliquée, 7: 307–20.Google Scholar
Pflüger, M. (2004), A simple, analytically solvable, Chamberlinian agglomeration model, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34: 565–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pflüger, M., and Südekum, J. (2007), On Pitchforks and Tomahawks, Discussion Paper no. 3258, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn.Google Scholar
Pflüger, M., and Südekum, J. (2008), A synthesis of footloose-entrepreneur new economic geography models: when is agglomeration smooth and easily reversible?, Journal of Economic Geography, 8: 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poelhekke, S. (2007), The Effect of Skills on Employment Growth: Adjusting Bias and Weak IVs with New Evidence from German Metropolitan Areas, working paper, European University Institute, Florence.Google Scholar
Pollins, B. M. (1989), Conflict, cooperation, and commerce: the effects of international political interactions on bilateral trade flows, American Journal of Political Science, 33: 737–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poter, M. E. (1998), Clusters and the new economics of competition, Harvard Business Review, 76: 77–90.Google Scholar
Pred, A. (1966), The Spatial Dynamics of US Urban-Industrial Growth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Puga, D. (1998), Urbanization patterns: European versus less developed countries, Journal of Regional Science, 38: 231–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puga, D. (1999), The rise and fall of regional inequalities, European Economic Review, 43: 303–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puga, D. (2002), European regional policy in light of recent location theories, Journal of Economic Geography, 2: 372–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puga, D., and Venables, A. J. (1996), The spread of industry: spatial agglomeration in economic development, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10: 440–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radelet, S., and Sachs, J. (1998), Shipping costs, manufactured exports, and economic growth, mimeo, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rajan, R. G., and Zingales, L. (2006), The Persistence of Underdevelopment: Institutions, Human Capital or Constituencies, Working Paper no. 12093, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Redding, S. J., and Sturm, D. M. (2005), Costs of Remoteness: Evidence from German Division and Reunification, Discussion Paper no. 5015, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London. Forthcoming, American Economic Review.Google Scholar
Redding, S. J., Sturm, D. M., and Wolf, N. (2007), History and Industry Location: Evidence from German Airports, Discussion Paper no. 6345, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
Redding, S. J., and Venables, A. J. (2004), Economic geography and international inequality, Journal of International Economics, 62: 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, L. A. (1997), A Ricardian model of new trade and location theory, Journal of Economic Integration, 12: 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, L. A. (1999), Economic geography and comparative advantage: agglomeration versus specialization, European Economic Review, 43: 357–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera-Batiz, L., and Romer, P. (1991), Economic integration and endogenous growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106: 531–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert-Nicoud, F. (2005), The structure of simple new economic geography models (or, on identical twins), Journal of Economic Geography, 5: 201–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, D. (ed.) (2003), In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., and Trebbi, F. (2004), Institutions rule: the primacy of institutions and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth, 9: 131–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P. M. (1986), Increasing returns and long-run growth, Journal of Political Economy, 94: 1002–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P. M. (1990), Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98, part 2: S71–S101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, K. T., and Resnick, M. (1980), The size distribution of cities: an examination of the Pareto law and privacy, Journal of Urban Economics, 8: 165–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstein-Rodan, P. (1943), Problems of industrialization in eastern and south-eastern europe, Economic Journal, 53: 202–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, S. S., and Strange, W.C. (2004), Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies, in Henderson, J. V. and Thisse, J.-F. (eds.), The Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol. IV, Cities and Geography, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2119–72.Google Scholar
Rossi-Hansberg, E., and Wright, M. L. J. (2007), Urban structure and economic growth, Review of Economic Studies, 74: 597–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothfels, J., and Wölfl, A. (1998), Determinanten der Produktivitätslücke in Ostdeutschland: Ergebnisse einer Tagung am IWH, Wirtschaft im Wandel, 1/1998: 3–11.Google Scholar
Rumley, D., and Minghi, J. V. (1991), The Geography of Border Landscapes, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. D. (2003), Institutions Don't Rule: Direct Effects of Geography on Per Capita Income, Working Paper no. 9490, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala-i-Martin, X. (2006), The world distribution of income: falling poverty and … convergence, period, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121: 351–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos Silva, J. M. C., and Tenreyro, S. (2006), The log of gravity, Review of Economics and Statistics, 88: 641–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1952), The transfer problem and transport costs: the terms of trade when impediments are absent, Economic Journal, 62: 278–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, T. C. (1978), Micromotives and Macrobehavior, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Scitovsky, T. (1954), Two concepts of external economies, Journal of Political Economy, 62: 143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, A. J. (2000), Economic geography: the great half-century, in Clark, G. L., Feldman, M. P., and Gertler, M. S. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Geography, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 18–49.Google Scholar
Scott, A. J. (2004), A perspective of economic geography, Journal of Economic Geography, 5: 479–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, A. J. (2006), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, vol 4: a view from geography, Journal of Economic Geography, 6: 104–7.Google Scholar
Shone, R. (1997), Economic Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, B. A., and Elkins, Z. (2004), The globalization of liberalization: policy diffusion in the international political economy, American Political Science Review, 98: 171–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. (1955), On a class of skew distribution functions, Biometrika, 42: 425–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinn, H. W. (2003), The New Systems Competition, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöberg, Ö., and Sjöholm, F. (2002), Common ground? Prospects for integrating the economic geography of geographers and economists, Environment and Planning, A, 34: 467–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. (1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London: Strahan and Cadell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R. M. (1994), Perspectives on growth theory, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soo, K. T. (2005), Zipf's law for cities: a cross-country investigation, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35: 239–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, A. M. (1976), Product selection, fixed costs and monopolistic competition, Review of Economic Studies, 43: 217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalker, P. (2000), Workers without Frontiers: The Impact of Globalization on International Migration, Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
Starrett, D. (1978), Market allocation of location choice in a model with free mobility, Journal of Economic Theory, 17: 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stelder, D. (2005), A geographical agglomeration model for Europe, Journal of Regional Science, 45: 657–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J. Q. (1947), Suggested principles of “social physics,” Science, 106: 179–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J. Q. (1948), Demographic gravitation: evidence and applications, Sociometry, 11: 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (2004), Reflections on the state of the theory of monopolistic competition, in Brakman, S. and Heijdra, B. (eds.), The Monopolistic Competition Revolution in Retrospect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 134–48.Google Scholar
Storper, M. (1997), The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy, New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Storper, M. (2003), Institutions, Incentives and Communication in Economic Geography, Heidelberg: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Storper, M., and Venables, A. J. (2004) Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy, Journal of Economic Geography, 4: 351–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. (1997), Gibrat's legacy, Journal of Economic Literature, 45: 40–59.Google Scholar
Tabuchi, T. (1998), Urban agglomeration and dispersion: a synthesis of Alonso and Krugman, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 44: 333–51.Google Scholar
Tabuchi, T. and Thisse, J.-F. (2002), Taste heterogeneity, labor mobility and economic geography, Journal of Development Economics, 69: 155–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thirlwall, T. (1991), Growth and Development, with Special Reference to Developing Countries, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. (1996), Increasing returns, congestion costs and the geographic concentration of firms, mimeo, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, J. (1962), Shaping the World Economy, New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
,UNCTAD (1996), Incentives and Foreign Direct Investment, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
,UNCTAD (2006), World Investment Report 2006, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
,UNFPA (2007), State of World Population 2007, New York: United Nations Population Fund.Google Scholar
Bergeijk, P. A. G., and Oldersma, H. (1990), Détente, market-oriented reform and German unification: potential consequences for the world trade system, Kyklos, 43: 599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houtum, H. (1998), The development of cross-border economic relations, PhD thesis, Tilburg University, Tilburg.
Marrewijk, C. (1999), Capital accumulation, learning and endogenous growth, Oxford Economic Papers, 51: 453–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrrewijk, C. (2000), Factor abundance and geographical economics, mimeo, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Marrewijk, C. (2006), Geographical economics model with congestion, in Schuh, N. and Schuster, P. (eds.), New Regional Economics in Central European Economies: The Future of CENTROPE, Vienna: Oesterreichische Nationalbank, 17–35.Google Scholar
Marrewijk, C. (2007), International Economics: Theory, Application and Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marrewijk, C. (forthcoming 2009), Intra-industry trade, in: Reinert, K. A. and Rajan, R. S. (eds.), The Princeton Encyclopedia of the World Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Marrewijk, C., Stibora, J., and Viaene, J.-M. (1994), Capital Goods and Baumol's Law, Discussion Paper no. 94-42, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Marrewijk, C., and Verbeek, J. (1993), Sector-specific capital, “bang-bang” investment and the Filippov solution, Journal of Economics, 57: 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables, A. J. (1985), Trade and trade policy with imperfect competition: the case of identical products and free entry, Journal of International Economics, 19: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables, A. J. (1996), Equilibrium locations of vertically linked industries, International Economic Review, 37: 341–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables, A. J. (1998), Localization of industry and trade performance, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12: 52–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables, A. J. (1999), Fragmentation and multinational production, European Economic Review, 43: 935–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables, A. J., and Limao, N. (2002), Geographical disadvantage: a Heckscher–Ohlin–von-Thünen model of international specialisation, Journal of International Economics, 58: 239–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thünen, J. H. (1826), Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie, Hamburg: Perthes.Google Scholar
Weber, A. (1909), Über den Standort der Industrien, Tübingen: JCB Mohr.Google Scholar
Weibull, J. W. (1995), Evolutionary Game Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. (1999), Theories of tax competition, National Tax Journal, 52: 263–304.Google Scholar
Wong, K. Y. (1986), Are international trade and factor mobility substitutes?, Journal of International Economics, 20: 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooldridge, J. M. (2000), Introductory Econometrics, Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.Google Scholar
,World Bank (2002), Globalization, Growth and Poverty: Building an Inclusive World Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
,World bank (2006), World Development Indicators 2006, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
,WTO (2006), World Trade Report, Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Zipf, G. K. (1949), Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort, New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Zodrow, G. R., and Mieszkowski, P. (1986), Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goods, Journal of Urban Economics, 19: 356–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Steven Brakman, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Harry Garretsen, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Charles van Marrewijk, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Book: The New Introduction to Geographical Economics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818745.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Steven Brakman, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Harry Garretsen, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Charles van Marrewijk, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Book: The New Introduction to Geographical Economics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818745.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Steven Brakman, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Harry Garretsen, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands, Charles van Marrewijk, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Book: The New Introduction to Geographical Economics
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818745.014
Available formats
×