Cognitive Development

Philip David Zelazo; Stephanie M. Carlson

Part I - Cognitive Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 May 2017

Philip David Zelazo and

Edited by

Elliot Turiel and

Nancy Budwig: Affiliation:
Clark University, Massachusetts
Elliot Turiel: Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Philip David Zelazo: Affiliation:
University of Minnesota

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: New Perspectives on Human Development , pp. 13 - 142

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316282755 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Baetu, I., & Shultz, T. R. (2010). Development of prototype abstraction and exemplar memorization. In Ohlsson, S. & Catrambone, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 814–819). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Baluja, S., & Fahlman, S. E. (1994). Reducing network depth in the cascade-correlation learning architecture. Pittsburgh, PA: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar

Berthiaume, V. G., Shultz, T. R., & Onishi, K. H. (2013). A constructivist connectionist model of developmental transitions on false-belief tasks. Cognition, 126(3), 441–458.Google Scholar

Buckingham, D., & Shultz, T. R. (1996). Computational power and realistic cognitive development Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 507–511). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Buckingham, D., & Shultz, T. R. (2000). The developmental course of distance, time, and velocity concepts: A generative connectionist model. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 305–345.Google Scholar

Dandurand, F., & Shultz, T. R. (2014). A comprehensive model of development on the balance-scale task. Cognitive Systems Research, 31 –32, 1–25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2013.10.001 CrossRef Google Scholar

Egri, L., & Shultz, T. R. (2006). A compositional neural-network solution to prime-number testing. In Sun, R. & Miyake, N. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1263–1268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Fahlman, S. E., & Lebiere, C. (1990). The cascade-correlation learning architecture. In Touretzky, D. S. (Ed.), Advances in neural information processing systems 2 (pp. 524–532). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1980). On the impossibility of learning “more powerful” structures. In Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (Ed.), The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 142–152). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Gerken, L. A., Balcomb, F. K., & Minton, J. L. (2011). Infants avoid “labouring in vain” by attending more to learnable than unlearnable linguistic patterns. Developmental Science, 14(5), 972–979.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Griffiths, T. L., Kemp, C., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2008). Bayesian models of cognition. In Sun, R. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology (pp. 59–100). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y. (2006). A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Computation, 18, 1527–1554.Google Scholar

Jamrozik, A., & Shultz, T. R. (2007). Learning the structure of a mathematical group. In McNamara, D. & Trafton, G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1115–1120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kidd, C., Piantadosi, S. T., & Aslin, R. N. (2010). The Goldilocks Effect: Infants’ preference for stimuli that are neither too predictable nor too surprising. In Ohlsson, S. & Catrambone, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2476–2481). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Kidd, C., Piantadosi, S. T., & Aslin, R. N. (2012). The Goldilocks Effect: Human infants allocate attention to visual sequences that are neither too simple nor too complex. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e36399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036399Google Scholar

Lany, J., Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. (2007). The role of prior experience in language acquisition. Cognitive Science, 31, 481–507.Google Scholar

Mareschal, D., & Shultz, T. R. (1999). Development of children’s seriation: A connectionist approach. Connection Science, 11, 149–186.Google Scholar

Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1999). The child’s conception of geometry. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Quartz, S. R. (2003). Learning and brain development: A neural constructivist perspective. In Quinlan, P. T. (Ed.), Connectionist models of development: developmental processes in real and artificial neural networks (pp. 279–309). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Schlimm, D., & Shultz, T. R. (2009). Learning the structure of abstract groups. In Taatgen, N. A. & Rijn, H. v. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2950–2955). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R. (1998). A computational analysis of conservation. Developmental Science, 1, 103–126.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R. (2001). Assessing generalization in connectionist and rule-based models under the learning constraint. Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 922–927). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R. (2003). Computational developmental psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R. (2006). Constructive learning in the modeling of psychological development. In Munakata, Y. & Johnson, M. H. (Eds.), Processes of change in brain and cognitive development: Attention and performance XXI. (pp. 61–86). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R. (2011). Computational modeling of infant concept learning: The developmental shift from features to correlations. In Oakes, L. M., Cashon, C. H., Casasola, M., & Rakison, D. H. (Eds.), Infant perception and cognition: Recent advances, emerging theories, and future directions (pp. 125–152). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R., & Bale, A. C. (2001). Neural network simulation of infant familiarization to artificial sentences: Rule-like behavior without explicit rules and variables. Infancy, 2, 501–536.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R., & Bale, A. C. (2006). Neural networks discover a near-identity relation to distinguish simple syntactic forms. Minds and Machines, 16, 107–139.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R., Berthiaume, V. G., & Dandurand, F. (2010). Bootstrapping syntax from morpho-phonology Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (pp. 52–57). Ann Arbor, MI: IEEE.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R., Buckingham, D., & Oshima-Takane, Y. (1994). A connectionist model of the learning of personal pronouns in English. In Hanson, S. J., Petsche, T., Kearns, M., & Rivest, R. L. (Eds.), Computational learning theory and natural learning systems, Vol. 2: Intersection between theory and experiment (pp. 347–362). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R., & Cohen, L. B. (2004). Modeling age differences in infant category learning. Infancy, 5, 153–171.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R., & Doty, E. (2014). Knowing when to quit on unlearnable problems: another step towards autonomous learning. Computational Models of Cognitive Processes (pp. 211–221). London: World Scientific.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R., Doty, E., & Dandurand, F. (2012). Knowing when to abandon unproductive learning. In Miyake, N., Peebles, D., & Cooper, R. P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2327–2332). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R., & Fahlman, S. E. (2010). Cascade-correlation. In Sammut, C. & Webb, G. I. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, Part 4/C (pp. 139–147). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R., & Gerken, L. A. (2005). A model of infant learning of word stress. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2015–2020). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R., Mysore, S. P., & Quartz, S. R. (2007). Why let networks grow? In Mareschal, D., Sirois, S., Westermann, G., & Johnson, M. H. (Eds.), Neuroconstructivism: Perspectives and prospects (Vol. 2, pp. 65–98). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R. & Rivest, F. (2001). Knowledge-based cascade-correlation: Using knowledge to speed learning. Connection Science, 13, 1–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R., Rivest, F., Egri, L., Thivierge, J.-P., & Dandurand, F. (2007). Could knowledge-based neural learning be useful in developmental robotics? The case of KBCC. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 4, 245–279.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R., Thivierge, J. P., & Laurin, K. (2008). Acquisition of concepts with characteristic and defining features. In Love, B. C., McRae, K., & Sloutsky, V. M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 531–536). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Shultz, T. R., & Vogel, A. (2004). A connectionist model of the development of transitivity. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1243–1248). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Sirois, S., & Shultz, T. R. (1998). Neural network modeling of developmental effects in discrimination shifts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 235–274.Google Scholar

Sirois, S., & Shultz, T. R. (2006). Preschoolers out of adults: Discriminative learning with a cognitive load. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1357–1377.Google Scholar

Spencer, J. P., Austin, A., & Schutte, A. R. (2012). Contributions of dynamic systems theory to cognitive development. Cognitive Development, 27, 401–418.Google Scholar

Wilkening, F. (1981). Integrating velocity, time, and distance information: a developmental study. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 231–247.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

References

Aboud, F. E. (1988). Children and prejudice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Aboud, F. E. (2008). A social-cognitive developmental theory of prejudice. In Quintana, S. M. & McKown, C. (Eds.) Handbook of race, racism, and the developing child (pp. 55–71). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Aboud, F. E. (2013). What are they thinking? The mystery of young children’s thoughts on race. In Banaji, M. R. & Gelman, S. A. (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 332–335). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aboud, F. E., Tredoux, C., Tropp, L. R., Brown, C. S., Niens, U., & Noor, N. M. (2012). Interventions to reduce prejudice and enhance inclusion and respect for ethnic differences in early childhood: A systematic review. Developmental Review, 32, 307–336. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2012.05.001CrossRef Google Scholar

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Anzures, G., Kelly, D. J., Pascalis, O., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., de Viviés, X., & Lee, K. (2014). Own- and other-race face identity recognition in children: The effects of pose and feature composition. Developmental Psychology, 50, 469–481.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Anzures, G., Pascalis, O., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., & Lee, K. (2011). Minimizing skin color differences does not eliminate the own-race recognition advantage in infants. Infancy, 16, 640–654. PMCID: PMC3203025Google Scholar

Anzures, G., Quinn, P. C., Pascalis, O., Slater, A. M., & Lee, K. (2013a). Development of own-race biases. Visual Cognition, 21, 1165.Google Scholar

Anzures, G., Quinn, P. C., Pascalis, O., Slater, A. M., Tanaka, J. W., & Lee, K. (2013b). Developmental origins of the other-race effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 173–178.Google Scholar

Bahrick, L. E., & Lickliter, R. (2000). Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 36, 190–201.Google Scholar

Balas, B., & Quinn, P. C. (2015, March). Simulating classification of face race by infants: Similarities and differences between model and infant looking performance. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013). Blindspot: Hidden biases of good people. New York: Delacorte Press.Google Scholar

Bar-Haim, Y., Ziv, T., Lamy, D., & Hodes, R. M. (2006). Nature and nurture in own-race face processing. Psychological Science, 17, 159–163.Google Scholar

Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). The development of implicit attitudes evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychological Science, 17, 53–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–9280.2005.01664.xGoogle Scholar

Bigler, R. S. (2013). Understanding and reducing social stereotyping and prejudice among children. In Banaji, M. R. & Gelman, S. A. (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 327–331). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2007). Developmental intergroup theory explaining and reducing children’s social stereotyping and prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 162–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00496.xGoogle Scholar

Cameron, L., Rutland, A., Brown, R., & Douch, R. (2006). Changing children’s intergroup attitudes toward refugees: Testing different models of extended contact. Child Development, 77, 1208–1219. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00929.xGoogle Scholar

Castelli, L., De Amicis, L., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The loyal member effect: on the preference for ingroup members who engage in exclusive relations with the ingroup. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1347–1359. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1347Google Scholar

Corriveau, K. H., Fusaro, M., & Harris, P. L. (2009). Going with the flow: Preschoolers prefer nondissenters as informants. Psychological Science, 20, 372–377.Google Scholar

Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163–170. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00328Google Scholar

Degner, J., & Dalege, J. (2013). The apple does not fall far from the tree, or does it? A meta-analysis of parent–child similarity in intergroup attitudes. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1270–1304. doi: 10.1037/a0031436Google Scholar

Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 62–68.Google Scholar

Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). From American city to Japanese village: A cross-cultural investigation of implicit race attitudes. Child Development, 77, 1268–1281. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00933.xGoogle Scholar

Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). Children and social groups: A developmental analysis of implicit consistency in Hispanic Americans. Self and Identity, 6, 238–255. doi: 10.1080/15298860601115344Google Scholar

Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Banaji, M. R. (2008). The development of implicit intergroup cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 248–253. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.006Google Scholar

Dunham, Y., Baron, A. S., & Carey, S. (2011). Consequences of “minimal” group affiliations in children. Child Development, 82, 793–811. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–8624.2011.01577.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dunham, Y., Chen, E. E., & Banaji, M. R. (2013). Two signatures of implicit intergroup attitudes: Developmental invariance and early enculturation. Psychological Science, 24, 860–868. doi: 10.1177/0956797612463081Google Scholar

Dunham, Y., Newheiser, A., Hoosain, L., Merrill, A., & Olson, K. R. (2014). From a different vantage: Intergroup attitudes among children from low- and intermediate-status racial groups. Social Cognition, 32, 1–21. doi: 10.1521/soco.2014.32.1.1Google Scholar

Feddes, A. R., Noack, P., & Rutland, A. (2009). Direct and extended friendship effects on minority and majority children’s interethnic attitudes: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 80, 377–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01266.xGoogle Scholar

Feinman, S. (1980). Infant response to race, size, proximity, and movement of strangers. Infant Behavior and Development, 3, 187–204. doi: 10.1016/S0163-6383(80)80025-7Google Scholar

Gaither, S. E., Pauker, K., & Johnson, S. P. (2012). Biracial and monoracial infant own-race face perception: An eye tracking study. Developmental Science, 15, 775–782.Google Scholar

Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gergely, G., Egyed, K., & Kiraly, I. (2007). On pedagogy. Developmental Science, 10, 139–146.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 4–27. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. doi: 10.1037/a0015575Google Scholar

Grossmann, T., Striano, T., & Friederici, A. D. (2006). Crossmodal integration of emotional information from face and voice in the infant brain. Developmental Science, 9, 309–315.Google Scholar

Hadley, H., Pickron, C. B., & Scott, L. S. (2015). The lasting effects of process-specific versus stimulus-specific learning during infancy. Developmental Science, 18, 842–852.Google Scholar

Hardin, C. D., & Banaji, M. R. (2013). The nature of implicit prejudice: Implications for personal and public policy. In Shafir, E. (Ed.), The behavioral foundations of public policy (pp. 13–31). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hepper, P. (2015). Behavior during the prenatal period: Adaptive for development and survival. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 38–43.Google Scholar

Hetherington, C., Hendrickson, C., & Koenig, M. (2014). Reducing an in-group bias in preschool children: the impact of moral behavior. Developmental Science, 17, 1042–1049. doi: 10.1111/desc.12192Google Scholar

Horowitz, E. L., & Horowitz, R. E. (1938). Development of social attitudes in children. Sociometry, 1, 301–338.Google Scholar

Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2004). Ambiguity in social categorization: The role of prejudice and facial affect in race categorization. Psychological Science, 15, 342–345. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00680.xGoogle Scholar

Kelly, D. J., Liu, S., Ge, L., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., Liu, Q., & Pascalis, O. (2007a). Cross-race preferences for same-race faces extend beyond the African versus Caucasian contrast in 3-month-old infants. Infancy, 11, 87–95.Google Scholar

Kelly, D. J., Liu, S., Lee, K., Quinn, P. C., Pascalis, O., Slater, A. M., & Ge, L. (2009). Development of the other-race effect in infancy: Evidence towards universality? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 17, 105–114.Google Scholar

Kelly, D. J., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., Ge, L., & Pascalis, O. (2007b). The other-race effect develops during infancy. Psychological Science, 18, 1084–1089.Google Scholar

Kelly, D. J., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., Gibson, A., Smith, M., Ge, L., & Pascalis, O. (2005). Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. Developmental Science, 8, F31–F36.Google Scholar

Killen, M., Margie, N. G., & Sinno, S. (2006). Morality in the context of intergroup relationships. In Killen, M., & Smetana, J. G. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 155–183). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Killen, M., Rutland, A., & Ruck, M. D. (2011). Promoting equity, tolerance, and justice in childhood. Social Policy Report, 25, 1–33.Google Scholar

Kinzler, K. D., Dupoux, E., Spelke, E. S. (2007). The native language of social cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 12577–12580.Google Scholar

Kinzler, K. D., & Spelke, E. S. (2011). Do infants show social preferences for people differing in race? Cognition, 119, 1–9.Google Scholar

Kubicek, C., Hillairet de Boisferon, A., Dupierrix, E., Pascalis, O., Loevenbruck, H., & Gervain, J., & Schwarzer, G. (2014). Cross-modal matching of audio-visual German and French fluent speech in infancy. PLoS ONE 9(2):e89275.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P. K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P. (2006). Infants show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12 months. Developmental Science, 9, F13–F21.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. H., & Lacerda, F. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606–608.Google Scholar

Lai, C. K., Marini, M., Lehr, S. A., Cerruti, C., Shin, J. E. L., Joy-Gaba, J. A., … & Frazier, R. S. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1765–1785. doi: 10.1037/a0036260Google Scholar

Lai, C. K., Skinner, A. L., Cooley, E., Murrar, S., Brauer, M., Devos, T., … & Simon, S. (2016). Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 101–116. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2712520Google Scholar

Lebrecht, S., Pierce, L. J., Tarr, M. J., & Tanaka, J. W. (2009). Perceptual other-race training reduces implicit racial bias. PloS one, 4, e4215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004215Google Scholar

Lee, K., Anzures, G., Quinn, P. C., Pascalis, O., & Slater, A. (2011). Development of face processing expertise. In Calder, A. J., Rhodes, G., Johnson, M. H., & Haxby, J. V. (Eds.), Handbook of face perception (pp.753–778). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, K., Quinn, P. C., Pascalis, O., & Slater, A. (2013). Development of face processing abilities. In Zelazo, P. D. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of developmental psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 338–370). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Liu, S., Quinn, P. C., Wheeler, A., Xiao, N., Ge, L., & Lee, K. (2011). Similarity and difference in the processing of same- and other-race faces as revealed by eye-tracking in 4- to 9-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 180–189. PMCID: PMC3740558Google Scholar

Malatesta, C. Z., & Haviland, J. M. (1982). Learning display rules: The socialization of emotion expression in infancy. Child Development, 53, 991–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2013.12.001Google Scholar

Nesdale, D. (1999). Developmental changes in children’s ethnic preferences and social cognitions. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20, 501–519. doi: 10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00012-X10.1016/j.jesp.2011.08.011Google Scholar

Newheiser, A. K., & Olson, K. R. (2012). White and Black American children’s implicit intergroup bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 264–270.Google Scholar

Olson, K. R., Shutts, K., Kinzler, K. D., & Weisman, K. G. (2012). Children associate racial groups with wealth: Evidence from South Africa. Child Development, 83, 1884–1899. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01819.xGoogle Scholar

Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.Google Scholar

Qian, M. K., Heyman, G. D., Quinn, P. C., Messi, F. A., Fu, G., & Lee, K. (2016). Implicit racial biases in preschool children and adults from Asia and Africa. Child Development, 87, 285–296.Google Scholar

Qian, M., Quinn, P. C., Heyman, G. D., Pascalis, O., Fu, G., & Lee, K. (2017). Perceptual individuation training (but not mere exposure) reduces implicit racial bias in preschool children. Developmental Psychology.CrossRef Google Scholar

Quinn, P. C., Anzures, G., Lee, K., Pascalis, O., Slater, A., & Tanaka, J. W. (2013). On the developmental origins of differential responding to social category information. In Banaji, M. R. & Gelman, S. A. (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 286–291). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Quinn, P. C., Lee, K., Pascalis, O., & Tanaka, J. W. (2016). Narrowing in categorical responding to other-race face classes by infants. Developmental Science, 19, 362–371.Google Scholar

Raabe, T., & Beelmann, A. (2011). Development of ethnic, racial, and national prejudice in childhood and adolescence: A multinational meta-analysis of age differences. Child Development, 82, 1715–1737. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01668.xGoogle Scholar

Rennels, J. L., & Davis, R. E. (2008). Facial experience during the first year. Infant Behavior & Development, 31, 665–678.Google Scholar

Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2003). When prejudice does not pay: Effects of interracial contact on executive function. Psychological Science, 14, 287–290.Google Scholar

Rutland, A., Killen, M., & Abrams, D. (2010). A new social-cognitive developmental perspective on prejudice: The interplay between morality and group identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 279–291. doi: 10.1177/1745691610369468Google Scholar

Setoh, P., Lee, K. J. J., Zhang, L., Qian, M. K., Heyman, G. D., Quinn, P. C., & Lee, K. (under review). Racial categorization predicts implicit racial bias in preschool children.Google Scholar

Shutts, K., Kinzler, K. D., Katz, R. C., Tredoux, C., & Spelke, E. S. (2011). Race preferences in children: Insights from South Africa. Developmental Science, 14, 1283–1291. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01072.xGoogle Scholar

Sugden, N. A., Mohamed-Ali, M. I., & Moulson, M. C. (2014). I spy with my little eye: Typical, daily exposure to faces documented from a first-person infant perspective. Developmental Psychobiology, 56, 249–261.Google Scholar

Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Giovannini, D., Capozza, D., & Trifiletti, E. (2015). The greatest magic of Harry Potter: Reducing prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 45, 105–121. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12279Google Scholar

Werker, J. F., Yeung, H. H., & Yoshida, K. (2012). How do infants become native speech perception experts? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 221–226.Google Scholar

Wheeler, A., Anzures, G., Quinn, P. C., Pascalis, O., Omrin, D. S., & Lee, K. (2011). Caucasian infants scan own- and other-race faces differently. PLoS ONE, 6: e18621.Google Scholar

Xiao, N. G., Quinn, P. C., Xiao, W. S., Liu, S., Ge, L., Pascalis, O., & Lee, K. (2017). Older but not younger infants associate own-race faces with positive music and other-race faces with negative music. Developmental Science.Google Scholar

Xiao, N. G., Wu, R., Quinn, P. C., Liu, S., Tummeltshammer, K. S., Kirkham, N. Z., Ge, L., Pascalis, O., & Lee, K. (in press). Infants rely more on gaze cues from own-race than other-race adults for learning under uncertainty. Child Development.Google Scholar

Xiao, W. S., Fu, G., Quinn, P. C., Qin, J., Tanaka, J. W., Pascalis, O., & Lee, K. (2015). Individuation training with other-race faces reduces preschoolers’ implicit racial bias: a link between perceptual and social representation of faces in children. Developmental Science, 18, 655–663. doi: 10.1111/desc.12241Google Scholar

Xiao, W. S., Quinn, P. C., Pascalis, O., & Lee, K. (2014). Own- and other-race face scanning in infants: Implications for perceptual narrowing. Developmental Psychobiology (Special Issue on Perceptual Narrowing), 56, 262–273.Google Scholar

References

Agostino, A., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2010). Executive functions underlying multiplicative reasoning: Problem type matters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 286–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.09.006CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Aron, A. R. (2008). Progress in executive-function research from tasks to functions to regions to networks. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 124–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00561.xGoogle Scholar

Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170–177. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.010Google Scholar

Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Lei, Z., Trommer, B. L., Davenport, N. D., … & Mesulam, M. M. (2003). Neural development of selective attention and response inhibition. NeuroImage, 20, 737–751. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00404-XGoogle Scholar

Brydges, C. R., Anderson, M., Reid, C. L., & Fox, A. M. (2013). Maturation of cognitive control: delineating response inhibition and interference suppression. PloS one, 8, e69826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069826Google Scholar

Brydges, C. R., Fox, A. M., Reid, C. L., & Anderson, M. (2014). The differentiation of executive functions in middle and late childhood: A longitudinal latent-variable analysis. Intelligence, 47, 34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2014.08.010Google Scholar

Bunge, S. A., Dudukovic, N. M., Thomason, M. E., & Vaidya, C. J. (2002). Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: evidence from fMRI. Neuron, 33, 301–311. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00583-9Google Scholar

Bunge, S. A., & Zelazo, P. D. (2006). A brain-based account of the development of rule use in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 118–121. doi: 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00419.xGoogle Scholar

Casey, B. J., Cohen, J. D., Jezzard, P., Turner, R., Noll, D. C., … & Rapoport, J. L. (1995) Activation of prefrontal cortex in children during a nonspatial working memory task with functional MRI. Neuroimage, 2, 221–229. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1995.1029CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Casey, B. J., Davidson, M. C., Hara, Y., Thomas, K. M., Martinez, A., Galvan, A., … & Tottenham, N. (2004). Early development of subcortical regions involved in non‐cued attention switching. Developmental Science, 7, 534–542. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00377.x/fullGoogle Scholar

Ciesielski, K. T., Lesnik, P. G., Savoy, R. L., Grant, E. P., & Ahlfors, S. P. (2006). Developmental neural networks in children performing a Categorical N-Back Task. NeuroImage, 33, 980–990. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.028Google Scholar

Collette, F., Hogge, M., Salmon, E., & Van der Linden, M. (2006). Exploration of the neural substrates of executive functioning by functional neuroimaging. Neuroscience, 139, 209–221. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.05.035Google Scholar

Collette, F., Van der Linden, M., Laureys, S., Delfiore, G., Degueldre, C., Luxen, A., & Salmon, E. (2005). Exploring the unity and diversity of the neural substrates of executive functioning. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 409–423. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20118Google Scholar

Cragg, L., & Chevalier, N. (2012). The processes underlying flexibility in childhood. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 209–232. doi.org/10.1080/17470210903204618Google Scholar

Crone, E. A., Donohue, S. E., Honomichl, R., Wendelken, C., & Bunge, S. A. (2006). Brain regions mediating flexible rule use during development. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 11239–11247. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2165-06.2006Google Scholar

Darki, F., & Klingberg, T. (2015). The role of fronto-parietal and fronto-striatal networks in the development of working memory: A longitudinal study. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 1587–1595. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht352Google Scholar

Davis, E. P., Bruce, J., Snyder, K., & Nelson, C. A. (2003). The X-trials: Neural correlates of an inhibitory control task in children and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 432–443. doi: 10.1162/089892903321593144CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Diamond, A. (2006). The early development of executive functions. In Bialystok, E. & Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.), Lifespan cognition: Mechanisms of change (pp. 70–95). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Durston, S., Davidson, M. C., Tottenham, N., Galvan, A., Spicer, J., Fossella, J. A., & Casey, B. J. (2006). A shift from diffuse to focal cortical activity with development. Developmental Science, 9, 1–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00454.x/fullGoogle Scholar

Durston, S., Thomas, K. M., Yang, Y., Uluğ, A. M., Zimmerman, R. D., & Casey, B. J. (2002). A neural basis for the development of inhibitory control. Developmental Science, 5, F9–F16. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00235Google Scholar

Edin, F., Macoveanu, J., Olesen, P., & Tegnér, J. (2007). Stronger synaptic connectivity as a mechanism behind development of working memory-related brain activity during childhood. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 750–760. doi: /10.1162/jocn.2007.19.5.750Google Scholar

Espinet, S. D., Anderson, J. E., & Zelazo, P. D. (2012). N2 amplitude as a neural marker of executive function in young children: An ERP study of children who switch versus perseverate on the Dimensional Change Card Sort. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, S49–S58. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.12.002Google Scholar

Espinet, S. D., Anderson, J. E., & Zelazo, P. D. (2013). Reflection training improves executive function in preschool-age children: Behavioral and neural effects. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.009Google Scholar

Ezekiel, F., Bosma, R., & Morton, J. B. (2013). Dimensional Change Card Sort performance associated with age-related differences in functional connectivity of lateral prefrontal cortex. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.12.001Google Scholar

Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101–135. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101Google Scholar

Fuhs, M. W., & Day, J. D. (2011). Verbal ability and executive functioning development in preschoolers at head start. Developmental Psychology, 47, 404–416. doi: 10.1037/a0021065Google Scholar

Garon, N., Bryson, S. E., & Smith, I. M. (2008). Executive function in preschoolers: A review using an integrative framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 31–60. doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.31Google Scholar

Hughes, C., Ensor, R., Wilson, A., & Graham, A. (2010). Tracking executive function across the transition to school: A latent variable approach. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 20–36. doi: 10.1080/87565640903325691Google Scholar

Hwang, K., Velanova, K., & Luna, B. (2010). Strengthening of top-down frontal cognitive control networks underlying the development of inhibitory control: A functional magnetic resonance imaging effective connectivity study. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 15535–15545. doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2825-10.2010Google Scholar

Johnson, M. H. (2000). Functional brain development in infants: Elements of an interactive specialization framework. Child Development, 71, 75–81. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00120Google Scholar

Johnson, M. H. (2011). Interactive specialization: a domain-general framework for human functional brain development? Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 7–21. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2010.07.003Google Scholar

Johnstone, S. J., Barry, R. J., & Clarke, A. R. (2007). Behavioural and ERP indices of response inhibition during a Stop-signal task in children with two subtypes of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 66, 37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.05.011Google Scholar

Jonkman, L. M. (2006). The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/NoGo ERP study. Brain Research, 1097, 181–193. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.064Google Scholar

Jonkman, L. M., Sniedt, F. L. F., & Kemner, C. (2007). Source localization of the Nogo-N2: A developmental study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 1069–1077. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.017Google Scholar

Klingberg, T., Forssberg, H., & Westerberg, H. (2002). Increased brain activity in frontal and parietal cortex underlies the development of visuospatial working memory capacity during childhood. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1–10. doi: 10.1162/089892902317205276Google Scholar

Kraybill, J. H. (2014). A latent factor analysis of preschool executive functions: investigations of antecedents and outcomes (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Tech, Virgina.Google Scholar

Kwon, H., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2002). Neural basis of protracted developmental changes in visuo-spatial working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 13336–13341. doi: 10.1073/pnas.162486399Google Scholar

Lamm, C., Zelazo, P. D., & Lewis, M. D. (2006). Neural correlates of cognitive control in childhood and adolescence: Disentangling the contributions of age and executive function. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2139–2148. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.013Google Scholar

Lee, K., Bull, R., & Ho, R. M. H. (2013). Developmental changes in executive functioning. Child Development, 84, 1933–1953. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12096Google Scholar

Lehto, J. E., Juujärvi, P., & Kooistra, L. (2003). Dimensions of executive functioning: Evidence from children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 59–80. doi: 10.1348/026151003321164627Google Scholar

Lo, Y. H., Liang, W. K., Lee, H. W., Wang, C. H., Tzeng, O. J., Hung, D. L., … & Juan, C. H. (2013). The neural development of response inhibition in 5-and 6-year-old preschoolers: an ERP and EEG study. Developmental Neuropsychology, 38, 301–316. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2013.801980Google Scholar

Luna, B., & Sweeney, J. A. (2004). The emergence of collaborative brain function: fMRI studies of the development of response inhibition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021, 296–309. doi: 10.1196/annals.1308.035Google Scholar

Luna, B., Thulborn, K. R., Munoz, D. P., Merriam, E. P., Garver, K. E., Minshew, N. J., … & Sweeney, J. A. (2001). Maturation of widely distributed brain function subserves cognitive development. NeuroImage, 13, 786–793. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0743Google Scholar

McAuley, T., & White, D. A. (2011). A latent variables examination of processing speed, response inhibition, and working memory during typical development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 453–468. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.009Google Scholar

Mehnert, J., Akhrif, A., Telkemeyer, S., Rossi, S., Schmitz, C. H., Steinbrink, J., … & Neufang, S. (2013). Developmental changes in brain activation and functional connectivity during response inhibition in the early childhood brain. Brain and Development, 35, 894–904. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2012.11.006Google Scholar

Miller, M. R., Giesbrecht, G. F., Müller, U., McInerney, R. J., & Kerns, K. A. (2012). A latent variable approach to determining the structure of executive function in preschool children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13, 395–423. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2011.585478Google Scholar

Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14. doi: 10.1177/0963721411429458Google Scholar

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734Google Scholar

Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., … & Sears, M. R. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 2693–2698.Google Scholar

Moriguchi, Y., & Hiraki, K. (2009). Neural origin of cognitive shifting in young children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 6017–6021. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809747106Google Scholar

Moriguchi, Y., & Hiraki, K. (2011). Longitudinal development of prefrontal function during early childhood. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 153–162. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2010.12.004Google Scholar

Morton, J. B., Bosma, R., & Ansari, D. (2009). Age-related changes in brain activation associated with dimensional shifts of attention: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 46, 249–256. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.037Google Scholar

Nagy, Z., Westerberg, H., & Klingberg, T. (2004). Maturation of white matter is associated with the development of cognitive functions during childhood. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1227–1233. doi: 10.1162/0898929041920441Google Scholar

Niendam, T. A., Laird, A. R., Ray, K. L., Dean, Y. M., Glahn, D. C., & Carter, C. S. (2012). Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 241–268. doi: 10.3758/s13415-011-0083-5Google Scholar

O’Hare, E. D., Lu, L. H., Houston, S. M., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Sowell, E. R. (2008). Neurodevelopmental changes in verbal working memory load-dependency: An fMRI investigation. NeuroImage, 42, 1678–1685. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.057Google Scholar

Olesen, P. J., Macoveanu, J., Tegnér, J., & Klingberg, T. (2007). Brain activity related to working memory and distraction in children and adults. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 1047–1054. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhl014Google Scholar

Olesen, P. J., Nagy, Z., Westerberg, H., & Klingberg, T. (2003). Combined analysis of DTI and fMRI data reveals a joint maturation of white and grey matter in a fronto-parietal network. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.003Google Scholar

Østby, Y., Tamnes, C. K., Fjell, A. M., & Walhovd, K. B. (2011). Morphometry and connectivity of the fronto-parietal verbal working memory network in development. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3854–3862. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.001Google Scholar

Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., & Jankowski, J. J. (2011). Modeling a cascade of effects: the role of speed and executive functioning in preterm/full-term differences in academic achievement. Developmental Science, 14, 1161–1175. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01068.xGoogle Scholar

Rubia, K., Smith, A. B., Taylor, E., & Brammer, M. (2007). Linear age-correlated functional development of right inferior fronto-striato-cerebellar networks during response inhibition and anterior cingulate during error-related processes. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 1163–1177. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20347Google Scholar

Rubia, K., Smith, A. B., Woolley, J., Nosarti, C., Heyman, I., Taylor, E., & Brammer, M. (2006). Progressive increase of frontostriatal brain activation from childhood to adulthood during event-related tasks of cognitive control. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 973–993. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20237Google Scholar

Scherf, K. S., Sweeney, J. A., & Luna, B. (2006). Brain basis of developmental change in visuospatial working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1045–1058. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1045Google Scholar

Sheridan, M., Kharitonova, M., Martin, R. E., Chatterjee, A., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2014). Neural substrates of the development of cognitive control in children ages 5–10 years. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(8), 1840–1850. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00597Google Scholar

Shing, Y. L., Lindenberger, U., Diamond, A., Li, S.-C., & Davidson, M. C. (2010). Memory maintenance and inhibitory control differentiate from early childhood to adolescence. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35, 679–697. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2010.508546Google Scholar

Stuss, D. T., & Alexander, M. (2000). Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A conceptual view. Psychological Research, 63, 289–298. doi: 10.1007/s004269900007Google Scholar

Tamm, L., Menon, V., & Reiss, A. L. (2002). Maturation of brain function associated with response inhibition. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 1231–1238. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200210000-00013Google Scholar

Usai, M. C., Viterbori, P., & Traverso, L. (2014). Latent structure of executive function in five-and six-year-old children: a longitudinal study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 447–463. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2013.840578Google Scholar

Van der Sluis, S., de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2007). Executive functioning in children, and its relations with reasoning, reading, and arithmetic. Intelligence, 35, 427–449. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.001Google Scholar

Van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E. H., Boom, J., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2011). The development of executive functions and early mathematics: A dynamic relationship. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 100–119. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02035.xGoogle Scholar

Velanova, K., Wheeler, M. E., & Luna, B. (2009). The maturation of task set-related activation supports late developmental improvements in inhibitory control. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 12558–12567. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1579-09.2009Google Scholar

Vestergaard, M., Madsen, K. S., Baaré, W. F., Skimminge, A., Ejersbo, L. R., Ramsøy, T. Z., … & Jernigan, T. L. (2011). White matter microstructure in superior longitudinal fasciculus associated with spatial working memory performance in children. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2135–2146. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21592Google Scholar

Waxer, M., & Morton, J. B. (2011). Multiple processes underlying dimensional change card sort performance: A developmental electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3267–3279. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00038Google Scholar

Wendelken, C., Munakata, Y., Baym, C., Souza, M., & Bunge, S. A. (2012). Flexible rule use: Common neural substrates in children and adults. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 329–339. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.02.001Google Scholar

Wiebe, S. A., Espy, K. A., & Charak, D. (2008). Using confirmatory factor analysis to understand executive control in preschool children: I. Latent structure. Developmental Psychology, 44, 575–587. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.575Google Scholar

Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T., Nelson, J. M., Clark, C. A. C., Chevalier, N., & Espy, K. A. (2011). The structure of executive function in 3-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 436–452. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.008Google Scholar

Willoughby, M. T., Blair, C. B., Wirth, R. J., Greenberg, M., & Family Life Project Investigators. (2010). The measurement of executive function at age 3 years: Psychometric properties and criterion validity of a new battery of tasks. Psychological Assessment, 22, 306–317. doi: 10.1037/a0018708Google Scholar

Willoughby, M. T., Wirth, R. J., Blair, C. B., & Family Life Project Investigators. (2012). Executive function in early childhood: Longitudinal measurement invariance and developmental change. Psychological Assessment, 24, 418–431. doi: 10.1037/a0025779Google Scholar

Wu, K. K., Chan, S. K., Leung, P. W. L., Liu, W.-S., Leung, F. L. T., & Ng, R. (2011). Components and developmental differences of executive functioning for school-aged children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36, 319–337. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2010.549979Google Scholar

Zelazo, P. D., (2006). The Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS): A method of assessing executive function in children. Nature Protocols, 1, 297–301. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.46Google Scholar

Zelazo, P. D., Carlson, S. M., & Kesek, A. (2008). The development of executive function in childhood. In Nelson, C. A. & Luciana, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (2nd edn). (pp. 553–574). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Zuk, J., Benjamin, C., Kenyon, A., & Gaab, N. (2014). Behavioral and neural correlates of executive functioning in musicians and non-musicians. PLoS ONE, 9, e99868–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099868Google Scholar

References

Apel, K-O. (1995). Charles Peirce: From pragmatism to pragmaticism. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar

Arsalidou, M., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2016). Constructivist developmental theory is needed in developmental neuroscience. NPJ Science of Learning, 1, 16016.Google Scholar

Arsalidou, M., Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (2010). Misleading cues improve developmental assessment of attentional capacity: The color matching task. Cognitive Development, 25, 262–277.Google Scholar

Audi, R. (Ed.) (1995). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. H. (2010). The thalamic gateway: How the meditative training of attention evolves toward selfless transformations of attention. In Bruya, B. (Ed.), Effortless attention (pp. 373–407). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1979). Pascual-Leone’s M construct as a link between cognitive-developmental and psychometric concepts of intelligence. Intelligence, 3, 41–63.Google Scholar

Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1911). A method of measuring the development of intelligence in young children. Lincoln, IL: Courier Company.Google Scholar

Calvo, A. (2004). Detection of latent giftedness by means of mental-capacity testing. Unpublished master’s thesis, York University, Toronto, ON.Google Scholar

Canadian Achievement Tests – Third Edition (CAT-3). (2000). Markham, ON: Canadian Test Centre.Google Scholar

Canadian Cognitive Abilities Test (CCAT). (1998). Toronto, ON: Nelson Education.Google Scholar

Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404–431.Google Scholar

Case, R. (1975). Gearing the demands of instruction to the developmental capacities of the learner. Review of Educational Research, 45, 59–87.Google Scholar

Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 215–229.Google Scholar

Cowan, N., Ricker, T. J., Clark, K. M., Hinrichs, G. A., & Glass, B. A. (2014). Knowledge cannot explain the developmental growth of working memory capacity. Developmental Science, 18, 132–145.Google Scholar

Cunning, S. (2003). The direction-following task: Assessing mental capacity in the linguistic domain. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, York University, Toronto, ON.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J. (2002). g and cognitive elements of information processing: An agnostic view. In Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E. L. (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 151–181). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Goldstein, K. (2000). The organism. New York, NY: Zone Books. (Original work published 1934).Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Greenberg, L., & Pascual-Leone, J. (1995). A dialectical constructivist approach to experiential change. In Neimeyer, R. & Mahoney, M. (Eds.), Constructivism in psychotherapy (pp. 169–191). Washington, DC: APA Press.Google Scholar

Heitz, R. P., Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity, attentional control, and fluid intelligence. In Wilhelm, O. & Engle, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 61–78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Howard, S. J., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2014). Clarifying inhibitory control: Diversity and development of attentional inhibition. Cognitive Development, 31, 1–21.Google Scholar

Im-Bolter, N., Johnson, J., Ling, D., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2015). Inhibition: Mental control process or mental resource? Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 666–681.Google Scholar

Im-Bolter, N., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2006). Processing limitation in children with specific language impairment: The role of executive function. Child Development, 77, 1822–1841.Google Scholar

Johansen, J. D. (1993). Dialogic semiosis: An essay on signs and meaning. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Koffka, K. (1963). Principles of gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace, & World. (Original work published 1935).Google Scholar

Morra, S. (2008). A test of a neo-Piagetian model of the water-level task. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5, 369–400.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget’s developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301–345.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J. (1978). Compounds, confounds, and models in developmental information processing: A reply to Trabasso and Foellinger. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 26, 18–40.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J. (1980). Constructive problems for constructive theories: The current relevance of Piaget’s work and a critique of information-processing simulation psychology. In Kluwe, R. & Spada, H. (Eds.), Developmental models of thinking (pp. 263–296). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J. (1984). Attention, dialectic, and mental effort: Towards an organismic theory of life stages. In Commons, M. L., Richards, F. A., & Armon, G. (Eds.) Beyond formal operations: Late adolescence and adult cognitive development (pp. 182–215). New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J. (1989). An organismic process model of Witkin’s field-dependence- independence. In Globerson, T. & Zelniker, T. (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development (pp. 36–70). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J. (1995). Learning and development as dialectical factors in cognitive growth. Human Development, 38, 338–348.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J. (2012). Piaget as a pioneer of dialectical constructivism: Seeking dynamic processes for human science. In Marti, E. & Rodriguez, C. (Eds.), After Piaget. Edison, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J. (2013). Can we model organismic causes of working memory, efficiency and fluid intelligence? A meta-subjective perspective. Intelligence, 41, 738–743.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J. (2014). Dialectics. In Teo, T. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 421–428). New York, NY: SpringerReference.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J., & Baillargeon, R. (1994). Developmental measurement of mental attention. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 161–200.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J., Escobar, E. M. R., & Johnson, J. (2012). Logic: Development of logical operations. In Hirstein, W. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J., & Ijaz, H. (1989). Mental capacity testing as a form of intellectual-developmental assessment. In Samuda, R., Kong, S., Cummins, J., Pascual-Leone, J., & Lewis, J.. Assessment and placement of minority students (pp. 143–171). Toronto, ON: Hogrefe International.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (2004). Affect, self-motivation, and cognitive development: A dialectical constructivist view. In Dai, D. Y. & Sternberg, R. S. (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 197–235). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (2005). A dialectical constructivist view of developmental intelligence. In Wilhelm, O. & Engle, R. (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 177–201). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (2011). A developmental theory of mental attention: Its applications to measurement and task analysis (pp. 13–46). In Barrouillet, P. & Gaillard, V. (Eds.), Cognitive development and working memory: A dialogue between neo-Piagetian and cognitive approaches (pp. 13–46). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J., & Johnson, J. (2012, February). Scale invariance in the measurement of mental-attentional capacity. Poster presented at SRCD Themed Meeting: Developmental Methodology, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J., Johnson, J., & Agostino, A. (2010). Mental attention, multiplicative structures, and the causal problems of cognitive development. In Ferrari, M. & Vuletic, L. (Eds.), Developmental interplay between mind, brain and education: Essays in honor of Robbie Case (pp. 49–82). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J., Johnson, J., Baskind, S., Dworsky, S., & Severtston, E. (2000). Culture-fair assessment and the processes of mental attention. In Kozulin, A. & Rand, Y. (Eds.), Experience of mediated learning: An impact of Feuerstein’s theory in education and psychology (pp. 191–214). New York, NY: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J., Johnson, J., & Calvo, A. (2004, June). Can mental attentional capacity predict the Canadian Cognitive Abilities score of school children? Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Jean Piaget Society, Toronto, ON.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J., & Morra, S. (1991). Horizontality of water level: A neoPiagetian developmental review. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 23, 231–276.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J., Pascual-Leone, A., & Arsalidou, M. (2015). Neuropsychology still needs to model organismic processes “from within.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e83.Google Scholar

Pascual-Leone, J., & Smith, J. (1969). The encoding and decoding of symbols by children: A new experimental paradigm and a neo-Piagetian model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 8, 328–355.Google Scholar

Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study of evidence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1983). Piaget’s theory. In Mussen, P. H. (Series Ed.) & Kessen, W. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. History, theory, and methods (4th edn., pp. 103–128). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (Eds.) (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Psillos, S. (2002). Causation and explanation. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar

Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rouse Ball, W. W. (1905). Mathematical recreations and essays (4th edn.). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Shipstead, Z., Lindsey, D. R. B., Marshall, R. L., & Engle, R. W. (2014). The mechanisms of working memory capacity: Primary memory, secondary memory, and attention control. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 116–141.Google Scholar

Skuy, M., Gewer, A., Osrin, Y., Knunou, D., Fridjhon, P., & Rushton, J. P. (2002). Effects of mediated learning on Raven’s matrices scores of African and non-African university students in South Africa. Intelligence, 30, 221–232.Google Scholar

Spearman, C. E. (1927). The abilities of man, their nature and measurement. New York, NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Stöttinger, E., Filipowicz, A., Valadao, D., Culham, J. C., Goodale, M. A., Anderson, B., & Danckert, J. A. (2015). A cortical network that marks the moment when conscious representations are updated. Neuropsychologia, 79, 113–122.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: Examining the correlation between operation span and Raven. Intelligence, 33, 67–81.Google Scholar

Verguts, T., & De Boeck, P. (2002). On the correlation between working memory capacity and performance on intelligence tests. Learning and Individual Differences, 13, 37–55.Google Scholar

Waters, A. C., & Tucker, D. M. (2013). Self-regulation and neural development. In Sokol, B. W., Grouzet, F. M. E., & Muller, U. (Eds.), Self-regulation and autonomy (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1984). Symbol formation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles, essence and origin: Field dependence and field independence. New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

References

Amundson, R. (2005). The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: Roots of evo-devo. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arthur, W. (2004). Biased embryos and evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Avital, E., & Jablonka, E. (2000). Animal traditions: Behavioral inheritance in evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Badyaev, A. (2009). Evolutionary significance of phenotypic accommodation in novel environments: An empirical test of the Baldwin effect. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1125–1141.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Balakrishnan, C. N., & Sorenson, M. D. (2006). Premating reproductive isolation among sympatric indigobird species and host races. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 473–478.Google Scholar

Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bateson, P. P. G., & Gluckman, P. (2011). Plasticity, robustness, development, and evolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bearhop, S., Fiedler, W., Furness, R. W., Votier, S. C., Waldron, S., Newton, J., … & Farnsworth, K. (2005). Assortative mating as a mechanism for rapid evolution of a migratory divide. Science, 310, 502–504.Google Scholar

Belyaev, D. (1979). Destabilizing selection as a factor in domestication. Journal of Heredity, 70, 301–308.Google Scholar

Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2012). Individual development and evolution: Experiential canalization of self-regulation. Developmental Psychology, 48, 647–657.Google Scholar

Blumberg, M. S. (2005). Basic instinct: The genesis of novel behavior. New York, NY: Thunder’s Mouth Press.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.Google Scholar

Casey, M. B, & Karpinski, S. (1999). The development of turning bias is influenced by prenatal visual experience in domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). The Psychological Record, 49, 67–74.Google Scholar

Casey, M. B., & Lickliter, R. (1998). Prenatal visual experience influences the development of turning bias in bobwhite quail chicks (Colinus virginianus). Developmental Psychobiology, 32, 327–338.Google Scholar

Clark, M. M., & Galef, B. (1981). Environmental influence on development, behavior, and endocrine morphology of gerbils. Physiology & Behavior, 27, 761–765.Google Scholar

Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M. … & Buss, D. M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: Controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65, 110–126.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1975). The selfish gene. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

de Beer, G. (1940). Embryos and ancestors. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Denenberg, V. H., & Rosenberg, K. M. (1967). Nongenetic transmission of information. Nature, 216, 549–550.Google Scholar

Denenberg, V. H., & Whimbey, A. E. (1963). Behavior of adult rats is modified by the experiences their mothers had as infants. Science, 142, 1192–1193.Google Scholar

Deng, C., & Rogers, L. J. (2002). Social recognition and approach in the chick: Lateralization and effect of visual experience. Animal Behaviour, 63, 697–706.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. (1937). Genetics and the origin of species, 1st edn. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Duntley, J., & Buss, D. (2008). Evolutionary psychology is a metatheory for psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 30–34.Google Scholar

Feder, J. L., Roethele, J. B., Wlazlo, B., & Berlocher, S. H. (1997). Selective maintenance of allozyme differences among sympatric host races of the apple maggot fly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 94, 11417–11421.Google Scholar

Francis, D., Diorio, J., Liu, D., & Meaney, M. J. (1999). Nongenomic transmission across generations of maternal behavior and stress responses in the rat. Science, 286, 1155–1158.Google Scholar

Garstang, W. (1922). The theory of recapitulation: A critical re-statement of the biogenetic law. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, 35, 81–101.Google Scholar

Geary, D. C., & Huffman, K. J. (2002). Brain and cognitive evolution: forms of modularity and functions of mind. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 667–698.Google Scholar

Gilbert, S. F., & Epel, D. (2009). Ecological developmental biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, R. (1940). The material basis of evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, G. (1971). The development of species-identification in birds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, G. (1991). Experiential canalization of behavior development: Theory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 4–13.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, G. (1997). Synthesizing nature-nurture: Prenatal roots of instinctive behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gottlieb, G. (2002). Developmental-behavioral initiation of evolutionary change. Psychological Review, 109, 211–218.Google Scholar

Griffiths, P. E., & Stotz, K. (2013). Genetics and philosophy: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hall, B. K., Pearson, R. D., & Müller, G. B. (2004). Environment, development, and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Harshaw, C., & Lickliter, R. (2007). Interactive and vicarious acquisition of auditory preferences in Northern bobwhite chicks. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121, 320–331.Google Scholar

Harshaw, C., & Lickliter, R. (2011). Biased embryos: Prenatal experience alters the postnatal malleability of auditory preferences in bobwhite quail. Developmental Psychobiology, 53, 291–302.Google Scholar

Harshaw, C., Tourgeman, I., & Lickliter, R. (2008). Stimulus contingency and the malleability of species-typical auditory preferences in Northern bobwhite hatchlings. Developmental Psychobiology, 50, 460–472.Google Scholar

Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution: The modern synthesis. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Jablonka, E. (2006). Genes as followers in evolution: A post-synthesis synthesis? Biology and Philosophy, 21, 143–154.Google Scholar

Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Johnston, T. D., & Gottlieb, G. (1990). Neophenogenesis: A developmental theory of phenotypic evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 147, 471–495.Google Scholar

Johnston, T. D., & Lickliter, R. (2009). A developmental systems theory perspective on psychological change. In Spencer, J. P., Thomas, M., & McClelland, J. M. (Eds.), Toward a unified theory of development: Connectionism and dynamic systems theory re-considered (pp. 285–296). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

King, J. A. (1968). Species specificity and early experience. In Newton, G. & Levine, S. (Eds.), Early experience and behavior (pp. 42–64). Springfield, MA: Thomas.Google Scholar

Kuo, Z. Y. (1967). The dynamics of behavior development: An epigenetic view. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar

Laland, K. N., Uller, T., Feldman, M. W., Sterelny, K., Muller, G. B., Moczek, A., …. & Odling-Smee, J. (2015). The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions, and predictions. Proceeding of the Royal Society, B 282, 1–14.Google Scholar

Ledon-Rettig, C. C., Pfennig, D. W., Chunco, A., & Dworkin, I. (2014). Cryptic genetic variation in natural populations: A predictive framework. Integrated Comparative Biology, 54, 783–793.Google Scholar

Lerhman, D. S. (1953). A critique of Konrad Lorenz’s theory of instinctive behavior. Quarterly Review of Biology, 28, 337–363.Google Scholar

Lerner, R. M. & Benson, J. B. (2013). Embodiment and epigenesis: Theoretical and methodological issues in understanding the role of biology within the relational developmental system. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 44.Google Scholar

Levine, S. (1956). A further study of infantile handling and adult avoidance learning. Journal of Personality, 25, 70–80.Google Scholar

Lickliter, R. (2005). Prenatal sensory ecology and experience: Implications for perceptual and behavioral development in precocial birds. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 35, 235–274.Google Scholar

Lickliter, R. (2009). The fallacy of partitioning: Epigenetics’ validation of the organism-environment system. Ecological Psychology, 21, 138–146.Google Scholar

Lickliter, R., & Berry, T. D. (1990). The phylogeny fallacy: Developmental psychology’s misapplication of evolutionary theory. Developmental Review, 10, 348–364.Google Scholar

Lickliter, R. & Harshaw, C. (2010). Canalization and malleability reconsidered: The developmental basis of phenotypic stability and variability. In Hood, K. E., Halpern, C. T., Greenberg, G., & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental science, behavior, and genetics (pp. 491–526.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2003). Developmental dynamics: Toward a biologically plausible evolutionary psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 819–835.Google Scholar

Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2009). Rethinking epigenesis and evolution in light of developmental science. In Blumberg, M., Freeman, J., & Robinson, S. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of developmental behavioral neuroscience (pp. 30–47). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2013). A developmental evolutionary framework for psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17, 1184–1189.Google Scholar

Lickliter, R., & Honeycutt, H. (2015). Biology, development, and human systems. In: Overton, W. F. & Molenaar, P. C. M. (Vol. Eds.) Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Vol. 1: Theory & method (7th edn., pp. 162–207). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lickliter, R., & Ness, J. (1990). Domestication and comparative psychology: Status and strategy. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104, 211–218.Google Scholar

MacDonald, K., & Herschberger, S. L. (2005). Theoretical issues in the study of evolution and development. In Burgess, R. & MacDonald, K. (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human development (2nd edn., pp. 21–72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Malausa, T., Bethend, M. T., Bontemps, A., Bourguet, D., Cornuet, J. M., et al. (2005). Assortative mating in sympatric host races of the European corn borer. Science, 308, 258–260.Google Scholar

Mameli, M. (2004). Nongenetic selection and nongenetic inheritance. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55, 35–71.Google Scholar

Maynard Smith, J. (1985). Sexual selection, handicaps, and true fitness. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 115, 1–8.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the origins of species. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Meaney, M. J. (2010). Epigenetics and the biological definition of Gene × Environment interactions. Child Development, 81, 41–79.Google Scholar

Miller, D. B. (1997). The effects of nonobvious forms of experience on the development of instinctive behavior. In Dent-Reed, C. & Zukow-Goldring, P. (Eds), Evolving explanations of development (pp. 457–507). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Minelli, A., & Pradeu, T. (2014). Towards a theory of development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moczek, A. (2015). Re-evaluating the environment in developmental evolution. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 3, 1–8.Google Scholar

Moczek, A., Sears, K., Stollewerk, A., Wittkopp, P., Diggle, P., Dworkin, I., … & Extavour, C. (2015). The significance and scope of evolutionary developmental biology: A vision for the 21st century. Evolution and Development, 17, 198–219.Google Scholar

Moore, D. S. (2008). Espousing interactions and fielding reactions: Addressing laypeople’s beliefs about genetic determinism. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 331–348.Google Scholar

Moore, D. S. (2015). The developing genome: An introduction to behavioral epigenetics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nijhout, H. F. (2003). Development and evolution of adaptive polyphenisms. Evolution & Development, 5, 9–18.Google Scholar

Overton, W. F. (2015). Processes, relations, and relational developmental systems. In Overton, W. F. & Molenaar, P. C. M. (Vol. Eds.) Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Vol. 1: Theory & method (7th edn., pp. 9–62). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Overton, W. F., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2015). Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Vol. 1: Theory and method. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Oyama, S. (1985). The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oyama, S. (1993). Constraints and development. Netherlands Journal of Zoology, 43, 6–16.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2002). The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar

Price, E. O. (1999). Behavioral development in animals undergoing domestication. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 65, 245–271.Google Scholar

Price, E. O., & King, J. (1968). Domestication and adaptation. In Hafez, E. S. (Ed.), Adaptation of domestic animals (pp. 34–45). Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger.Google Scholar

Provine, W. (1971). The origins of theoretical population genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Renner, M. J., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (1987). Enriched and impoverished environments: Effects on brain and behavior. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Richardson, K. (1998). The origins of human potential: Evolution, development and psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Robert, J. S. (2004). Embryology, epigenesis, and evolution: Taking development seriously. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rogers, L. J. (1995). The development of brain and behavior in the chicken. Wallingford, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar

Ronca, A. E., & Alberts, J. R. (1994). Sensory stimuli associated with gestation and parturition evoke cardiac and behavioral responses in fetal rats. Psychobiology, 55, 270–282.Google Scholar

Rozenzweig, M. R., & Bennett, E. L. (1972). Cerebral changes in rats exposed individually to an enriched environment. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 80, 304–313.Google Scholar

Russell, E. S. (1930). The interpretation of development and heredity. Oxford, England: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Schmalhausen, I. (1949). Factors of evolution: The theory of stabilizing selection. Oxford, England: Blakiston.Google Scholar

Simpson, G. G. (1944). Tempo and mode in evolution. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Spear, N. E, & McKenzie, D. L. (1994). Intersensory integration in the infant rat. In Lewkowicz, D. J. & Lickliter, R. (Eds.), The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives (pp. 133–161). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Sporns, O. (2011). Networks of the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Stotz, K. (2014). Extended evolutionary psychology: The importance of transgenerational developmental plasticity. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–14.Google Scholar

Urban, J. B., Osgood, N. D., & Mabry, P. L. (2011). Developmental systems science: Exploring the application of systems science methods to developmental science questions. Research in Human Development, 8, 1–25.Google Scholar

Waddington, C. H. (1942). The epigenotype. Endeavour, 1, 18–20.Google Scholar

Wallace, M. T., & Stein, B. E. (2007). Early experience determines how the senses will interact. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 921–926.Google Scholar

West, M. J., King, A. P., & White, D. J. (2003). The case for developmental ecology. Animal Behaviour, 66, 617–622.Google Scholar

West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychology study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Baier, A. (1986). Trust and antitrust. Ethics, 96(2), 231–260. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381376 Google Scholar

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dautenhahn, K. (2004). Socially intelligent agents in human primate culture. In Trappl, R. & Payr, S. (Eds.), Agent culture: Human–agent interaction in a multicultural world (pp. 45–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, P. R., & Ehrlich, A. H. (2008). The dominant animal: human evolution and the environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Friedman, B., & Kahn, P. H. Jr. (2008). Human values, ethics, and design. In Jacko, J. A. & Sears, A. (Eds.), The human-computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications (pp. 1241–1266). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (Revised and updated chapter from the 2003 edition.)Google Scholar

Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. Jr., & Borning, A. (2006). Value Sensitive Design and information systems. In Zhang, P. & Galletta, D. (eds.), Human-computer interaction in management information systems: Foundations (pp. 348–372). Armonk, New York; London, England: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Friedman, B., Kahn, P. H. Jr., & Hagman, J. (2003). Hardware companions?: What online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 273–280). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery Press.Google Scholar

Gelman, R. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Green, A., Huttenrauch, H., & Eklundh, K. S. (2004). Applying the Wizard-of-Oz framework to cooperative service discovery and configuration. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN ’04) (pp. 575–580). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.Google Scholar

Helwig, C. C. (1995). Adolescents’ and young adults’ conceptions of civil liberties: Freedom of speech and religion. Child Development, 66, 152–166.Google Scholar

Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Young children’s naïve thinking about the biological world. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Jipson, J. L., & Gelman, S. A. (2007). Robots and rodents: Children’s inferences about living and nonliving kinds. Child Development, 78(6), 1675–1688. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01095.xGoogle Scholar

Kahn, P. H. Jr. (1992). Children’s obligatory and discretionary moral judgments. Child Development, 63(2), 416–430.Google Scholar

Kahn, P. H. Jr. (2011). Technological nature: Adaptation and the future of human life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Jr.Kahn, P. H., Freier, N., G., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Ruckert, J. H., Severson, R. L., & Kane, S. K. (2008). Design patterns for sociality in human robot interaction. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2008 (pp. 271–278). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar

Jr.Kahn, P. H., Friedman, B., Perez-Granados, D. R., & Freier, N. G. (2006). Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interaction Studies: Social Behavior and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7, 405–436.Google Scholar

Kahn, P. H. Jr., Gary, H. E., & Shen, S. (2013). Children’s social relationship with current and near-future robots. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 32–37. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12011Google Scholar

Kahn, P. H. Jr., Gill, B. T., Reichert, A. L., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Ruckert, J. H. (2010). Validating interaction patterns in HRI. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp.183–184). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar

Kahn, P. H. Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., … Shen, S. (2012). “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48, 303–314. doi: 10.1037/a0027033Google Scholar

Kahn, P. H. Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B. T., Ruckert, J. H., Shen, S., … Severson, R. L. (2012). Do people hold a humanoid robot morally accountable for the harm it causes? Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 33–40. doi: 10.1145/2157689.2157696Google Scholar

Kahn, P. H. Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Gill, B. T., Shen, S., Gary, H. E., & Ruckert, J. H. (2015). Will people keep the secret of a humanoid robot? – Psychological intimacy in HRI. Proceedings of the 10^th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, (pp. 173–180). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar

Kahn, P. H. Jr., Reichert, A. L., Gary, H. E., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Shen, S., … & Gill, B. T. (2011). The new ontological category hypothesis in human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 159–160. doi: 10.1145/1957656.1957710Google Scholar

Kahn, P. H. Jr., Ruckert, J. H., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Reichert, A., Gary, H., and Shen, S. (2010). Psychological intimacy with robots?: Using interaction patterns to uncover depth of relation. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 123–124). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar

Kahn, P. H. Jr., Severson, R. L., & Ruckert, J. H. (2009). The human relation with nature and technological nature. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 37–42.Google Scholar

Kahn, P. H. Jr., & Turiel, E. (1988). Children’s conceptions of trust in the context of social expectations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 403–419.Google Scholar

Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Killen, M., & Smetana, J. G. (Eds.) (2006). Handbook of moral development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar

Levy, D. N. (2007). Love + sex with robots: The evolution of human-robot relations. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

MacDorman, K. F., & Ishiguro, H. (2006). The uncanny advantage of using androids in cognitive and social science research. Interaction Studies: Social Behavior and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems, 7(3), 297–337.Google Scholar

Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Boekhorst, R. T., Billard, A. (2004). Robots as assistive technology – Does appearance matter? In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN ’04) (pp. 277–282). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.Google Scholar

Rotenberg, K. J. (Ed.). (2010). Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26, 443–452.Google Scholar

Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35, 1–7.Google Scholar

Severson, R. L., & Carlson, S. M. (2010). Behaving as or behaving as if? Children’s conceptions of personified robots and the emergence of a new ontological category. Neural Networks, 23(8), 1099–1103.Google Scholar

Short, E., Hart, J., Vu, M., & Scassellati, B. (2010). No fair!! An interaction with a cheating robot. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 219–226). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar

Smetana, J. G., & Braeges, J. (1990). The development of toddlers’ moral and conventional judgments. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 36, 329–346.Google Scholar

Smetana, J. G., Schlagman, N., & Adams, P. W. (1993). Preschool children’s judgments about hypothetical and actual transgressions. Child Development, 64, 202–214.Google Scholar

Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Turiel, E. (1998). Moral development. In Damon, W. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. (5th ed.). Vol. 3: Eisenberg, N. (Ed.), Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 863–932). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Wainryb, C. (1995). Reasoning about social conflicts in different cultures: Druze and Jewish children in Israel. Child Development, 66, 390–401.Google Scholar

References

Alim, H. S., Ibrahim, A., & Pennycook, A. (2008). Global linguistic flows: Hip hop cultures, youth identities, and the politics of language: New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ball, A., & Farr, M. (2003). Language varieties, culture and teaching the English language arts. In Flood, J., Lapp, D., Squire, J., & Jensen, J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (2nd edn., pp. 435–445). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Bang, M., Medin, D. L., & Altran, S. (2007). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (104), 13868–13874.Google Scholar

Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). The ways of knowing. In Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (Eds.), Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind (pp. 23–131). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Boykin, A. W., Anderson, A. J., & Yates, J. (1979). Black psychology and the research process: Keeping the baby but throwing out the bath water. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiment by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruer, J. (1999). In search of brain-based education. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(9), 648–657.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T. (2002). Social neuroscience: Understanding the pieces fosters understanding the whole and vice versa. American Psychologist, 57, 819–831.Google Scholar

Cacioppo, J. T., Visser, P. S., & Pickett, C. L. (Eds.). (2005). Social neuroscience: People thinking about thinking people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar

Carlson, S. M., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2008). Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science, 11(2), 282–298.Google Scholar

Cole, M., & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture & thought: A psychological introduction. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., Sommerville, J. A., Chaminade, T., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2004). The neural bases of cooperation and competition: An fMRI investigation. NeuroImage, 23, 744–751.Google Scholar

Dunbar, K., Fugelsang, J., & Stein, C. (2007). Do naïve theories ever go away? Using brain and behavior to understand changes in concepts. In Lovett, M. C & Shah, P (Eds.)Thinking With Data, 193–206. New York, NY: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (2002). Beliefs that make smart people dumb. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Why smart people can be so stupid. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Eccles, J. (2005). Subjective task values and the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement related choices. In Elliott, A. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Farah, M., Betancourt, L., Shera, D., Savage, J., Giannetta, J., Brodsky, N., … & Hurt, H. (2008). Environmental stimulation, parental nurturance and cognitive development in humans. Developmental Science, 11(5), 793–801.Google Scholar

Farah, M., Shera, D., Savage, J., Betancourt, L., Giannetta, J., Brodsky, N., … Hurt, H. (2006). Childhood poverty: Specific associations with neuro-cognitive development. Brain Research, 1110(1), 166–174.Google Scholar

Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (1998). Dynamic development of psychological structures in action and thought. In Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (5th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 467–562). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Fisher, M. T. (2003). Open mics and open minds: Spoken word poetry in African diaspora participatory literacy communities. Harvard Education Review, 73(3), 362–389.Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H., & Miller, P. H. (1998). Social cognition. In Kuhn, D. & Siegler, R. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (5th edn., Vol. 2, pp. 851–898). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Gelman, R. (1990). First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and the animate-inanimate distinction as examples. Cognitive Science, 14, 79–106.Google Scholar

Gopnic, A., Meltzoff, A., & Kuhl, P. (1999). The scientist in the crib: What early learning tells us about the mind. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar

Graham, S. (1992). “Most of the subjects were white and middle class”: Trends in published research on African Americans in selected APA journals, 1970–1989. American Psychologist, 47(5), 629–639Google Scholar

Grande, S. M. A. (2000). American Indian geographies of identity and power: At the crossroads of Indigena and Mestizaje. Harvard Education Review, 70(4), 467–498.Google Scholar

Gutierrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.Google Scholar

Hackman, D. A., Gallop, R., Evans, G. W., & Farah, M. J. (2015). Socioeconomic status and executive function: Developmental trajectories and mediation. Developmental Science, 18(5), 686–702.Google Scholar

Heckman, J. J. (2012). An effective strategy for promoting social mobility. Boston Review, 10155–10162.Google Scholar

Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M., & Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: A methodological perspective. American Psychologist, 60(1), 27–36.Google Scholar

Hermes, M., Bang, M., & Marin, A. (2012). Designing indigenous language revitalization. Harvard Educational Review, 82(3), 381–402.Google Scholar

Johnston, B. H. (1976). Ojibway heritage. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, R. L. (1980). Black psychology (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar

Kawagley, A. O. (1995). A Yupiaq worldview: A pathway to an ecology and spirit. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.Google Scholar

Kinloch, V. (2010). Harlem on our minds: Place, race, and the literacies of urban youth. New York, NY: Teachers College PressGoogle Scholar

Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. A. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar

Lawson, G. M., Hook, C. J., Hackman, D. A., Farah, M. J., Griffin, J. A., Freund, L. S., & McCardle, P. (2015). Socioeconomic status and neurocognitive development: Executive function. In Griffin, J, McCardle, P, & Freund, L (Eds) Executive Function in Preschool Children: Integrating Measurement, Neurodevelopment, and Translational Research. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Lee, C. D. (1995). A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 608–631.Google Scholar

Lee, C. D. (2001). Is October Brown Chinese: A cultural modeling activity system for underachieving students. American Educational Research Journal, 38(1), 97–142.Google Scholar

Lee, C. D. (2005). Culture and language: Bi-dialectical issues in literacy. In Anders, P. L. & Flood, J. (Eds.), Culture and language: Bi-dialectical issues in literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar

Lee, C. D. (2007). Culture, literacy and learning: Taking bloom in the midst of the whirlwind. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Lee, C. D. (2008). The centrality of culture to the scientific study of learning and development: How an ecological framework in educational research facilitates civic responsibility. Educational Researcher, 37(5), 267–279.Google Scholar

Lee, C. D. (2009). Historical evolution of risk and equity: Interdisciplinary issues and critiques Review of Research in Education, 33, 63–100.Google Scholar

Lee, C. D. (2010). Soaring above the clouds, delving the ocean’s depths understanding the ecologies of human learning and the challenge for education science. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 643–655.Google Scholar

Lee, C. D., Spencer, M. B., & Harpalani, V. (2003). Every shut eye ain’t sleep: Studying how people live culturally. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 6–13.Google Scholar

Lomawaima, K. T., & McCarty, T. L. (2006). “ To remain an Indian”: Lessons in democracy from a century of Native American education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Majors, Y. (2015). Shop talk. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

McCarty, T., & Lee, T. (2014). Critical culturally sustaining/revitalizing pedagogy and indigenous education sovereignty. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 101–124.Google Scholar

Medin, D. L., Lee, C. D., & Bang, M. (2014). Particular points of view. Scientific American, 311(3), 44–45.Google Scholar

Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2003). What imitation tells us about social cognition: A rapprochement between developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences, 358, 491–500.Google Scholar

Meltzoff, A. N., Kuhl, P. K., Movellan, J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2009). Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 325(5938), 284–288.Google Scholar

Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.Google Scholar

Mintzes, J. J. (1984). Naive theories in biology: Children’s concepts of the human body. School Science and Mathematics, 84(7), 548–555.Google Scholar

Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Moses, R. P., Kamii, M., Swap, S. M., & Howard, J. (1989). The algebra project: Organizing in the spirit of Ella. Harvard Educational Review, 59(4), 423–443.Google Scholar

Nadel, L., Lane, R., & Ahern, G. L. (Eds.). (2000). The cognitive neuroscience of emotion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nasir, N. (2000). “Points ain’t everything”: Emergent goals and average and percent understandings in the play of basketball among African American students. Anthropology and Education, 31(1), 283–305.Google Scholar

Nasir, N. (2002). Identity, goals, and learning: Mathematics in cultural practice. In Nasir, N. & Cobb, P. (Eds.), Mathematical thinking and learning: Special issue on diversity, equity and mathematics learning, Vol. 4 (nos. 2 & 3) (pp. 211–247).Google Scholar

Nasir, N. (2005). Individual cognitive structuring and the sociocultural context: Strategy shifts in the game of dominoes. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 5–34.Google Scholar

Nasir, N., Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Lee, C. D. (2006). Learning as a cultural process: Achieving equity through diversity. In Sawyer, K. (Ed.), Handbook of the learning sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nasir, N., & Saxe, G. (2003). Emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 14–18.Google Scholar

Nobles, W. (1980). African philosophy: Foundations for black psychology. In Jones, R. L. (Ed.), Black psychology (2nd edn., pp. 23–36). New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

OECD. (2010). Pisa 2009 results: Overcoming social background. Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Vol. 2). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

Paris, D., & Winn, M. T. (2013). Humanizing research: Decolonizing qualitative inquiry with youth and communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Quartz, S. R., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002). Liars, lovers, and heroes: What the new brain science reveals about how we become who we are. New York, NY: William Morrow.Google Scholar

Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., Ballenger, C., & Ogonowski, M. (2005). The generative potential of students’ everyday knowledge in learning science. In Romberg, T., Carpenter, T., & Fae, D. (Eds.), Understanding mathematics and science matters. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(1), 61–94.Google Scholar

Saxe, G. B. (1988). The mathematics of child street vendors. Child Development, 59, 1415–1425.Google Scholar

Saxe, G. B. (1994). Studying cognitive development in sociocultural context: The development of a practice-based approach. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(3) 135–157.Google Scholar

Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1973). Cognitive consequences of formal and informal education. Science, 182(4112), 553–559.Google Scholar

Sellers, R., Shelton, N., Cooke, D., Chavous, T., Rowley, S. J., & Smith, M. (1998). A multidimensional model of racial identity: Assumptions, findings, and future directions. In Jones, R. (Ed.), African American identity development (pp. 275–303). Hampton, VA: Cobb & Henry Publishers.Google Scholar

Silva, C. M., Moses, R. P., Rivers, J., & Johnson, P. (1990). The algebra project: Making middle school mathematics count. Journal of Negro Education, 59(3), 375–392.Google Scholar

Spears, D. (2011). Economic decision-making in poverty depletes behavioral control. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 11(1), 1–42.Google Scholar

Spencer, M. B. (2006). Phenomenology and ecological systems theory: Development of diverse groups. In Damon, W. & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th edn., Vol. 1, pp. 829–893). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Spencer, M. B., Fegley, S., & Dupree, D. (2006). Investigating and linking social conditions of African-American children and adolescents with emotional well-being. Ethnicity and Disease, 16(2), 63–67.Google Scholar

Spencer, M. B., Fegley, S., & Harpalani, V. (2003). A theoretical and empirical examination of identity as coping: Linking coping resources to the self processes of African American youth. Journal of Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 181–187.Google Scholar

Spencer, M. B., Harpalani, V., Cassidy, E., Jacobs, C., Donde, S., & Goss, T. N. (2006). Understanding vulnerability and resilience from a normative development perspective: Implications for racially and ethnically diverse youth. In Chicchetti, D. & Cohen, E. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychopathology (Vol. 1). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379–440.Google Scholar

Super, C., & Harkness, S. (1986). The developmental niche: A conceptualization at the interface of child and culture. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 545–569.Google Scholar

Taylor, E. V. (2009). The purchasing practice of low-income students: The relationship to mathematical development. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(3), 370–415.Google Scholar

Taylor, E. V. (2013). The mathematics of tithing: A study of religious giving and mathematical development. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 20(2), 132–149.Google Scholar

Valdes, G. (1996). Con respeto: Bridging the distances between culturally diverse families and schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Varma, S., McCandliss, B., & Schwartz, D. (2008). Scientific and pragmatic challenges for bridging education and neuroscience. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 140–152.Google Scholar

Varma, S., & Schwartz, D. (2008). How should educational neuroscience conceptualise the relation between cognition and brain function? Mathematical reasoning as a network process. Educational Research, 50(2), 149–161.Google Scholar

Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A. S., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense-making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 529–552.Google Scholar

Warren, B., & Ogonowski, M. (2001, April). Embodied imagining: A study of adult learning in physics. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.Google Scholar

Weisner, T. S. (1984). Ecocultural niches of middle childhood: A cross-cultural perspective. In Collins, W. A. (Ed.), Development during middle childhood: The years from six to twelve (pp. 335–369). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.Google Scholar

Weisner, T. S. (2002). Ecocultural understanding of children’s developmental pathways. Human Development, 174, 275–281.Google Scholar

Whitehead, C. (2010). The culture ready brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 168–179.Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York, NY: Knopf.Google Scholar

Zajonc, R. B., & Marcus, H. (1984). Affect and cognition. In Izard, C. E., Kagan, J., & Zajonc, R. B. (Eds.), Emotions, cognition and behavior (pp. 73–102). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part I - Cognitive Development

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive