The preconditions of a NIAC

Yoram Dinstein

doi:10.1017/CBO9781107279391.003

2 - The preconditions of a NIAC

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2014

Yoram Dinstein

Show author details

Yoram Dinstein: Affiliation:
Tel-Aviv University

Book contents

Get access

Summary

NIACs as armed conflicts

As we shall see (infra 118), the definition of NIACs appearing in AP/II establishes a rather high threshold. Yet, all NIACs are covered by the chapeau of Common Article 3 (infra 409), which adverts tout court to an ‘armed conflict not of an international character’. This laconic language attests to the existence of the two components of (i) an armed conflict that is (ii) not of an international character. But, by themselves – even when combined – the two rudimentary ingredients do not cobble together a viable legal construct of a NIAC.

While a concrete determination as to whether a NIAC satisfies the demands of Common Article 3 has to be made ‘on a case-by-case basis’, it is of the utmost importance to get a fix on the crossover point prior to which no NIAC can be recognized in esse. The postulate of an armed conflict is that hostilities are raging between two (or more) opposing sides (cf. infra 93 about parties to the conflict). We have already dwelt (supra 34–5) on the nature of ‘hostilities’. The main challenge is to differentiate veritable NIAC hostilities from internal disturbances and IACs at both the lower and the upper ends of violence. In the words of the 2004 British Manual of the Law of Armed Conflict, there is ‘a spectrum of violence ranging from internal disturbances’ to NIACs and IACs: each band of that spectrum is subject to another legal regime.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law , pp. 20 - 36

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279391.003 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Prosecutor v. Rutaganda (ICTR, Trial Chamber, 1999), 39 ILM 557, 575 (2000)

Ciobanu, D., ‘The Concept and the Determination of the Existence of Armed Conflicts Not of an International Character’, 58 RDI 43, 52 (1975)Google Scholar

The Manual of the Law of Armed Conflict 17 (UK Ministry of Defence, 2004)

Prosecutor v. Musema (ICTR, Trial Chamber, 2000), para. 248

Groeben, C. von der, ‘The Conflict in Colombia and the Relationship between Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law in Practice: Analysis of the New Operational Law of the Colombian Armed Forces’, 16 JCSL141, 154–5 (2011)Google Scholar

Dahl, A.W. and Sandbu, M., ‘The Threshold of Armed Conflict’, 45 Mil.LLWR369, 380 (2006)Google Scholar

Krutzsch, W. and Trapp, R., A Commentary on the Chemical Weapons Convention 18 (1994)

Sassòli, M., ‘Use and Abuse of the Laws of War in the War on Terrorism’, 22 L&E195, 200 (2004)Google Scholar

Schöndorf, R.S., ‘Extra-State Armed Conflicts: Is There a Need for a New Legal Regime?’, 37 NYUJILP1, 2–6 (2004–5)Google Scholar

Kress, C., ‘Some Reflections on the International Legal Framework Governing Transnational Armed Conflicts’, 15 JCSL243–74 (2010)Google Scholar

Corn, G. and Jensen, E.T., ‘Transnational Armed Conflict: A “Principled” Approach to the Regulation of Counter-Terror Combat Operations’, 42 Is.LR46, 50 (2009)Google Scholar

Coombes, K., ‘Protecting Civilians during the Fight against Transnational Terrorism: Applying International Humanitarian Law to Transnational Armed Conflicts’, 46 Can.YIL241, 261 (2008)Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Gombo (ICC, Pre-Trial Chamber, 2009), paras. 231

Ronzitti, N., ‘The Crisis of the Traditional Law Regulating International Armed Conflicts at Sea and the Need for Its Revision’, The Law of Naval Warfare: A Collection of Agreements and Documents with Commentaries 1, 11 (Ronzitti, N. ed., 1988)Google Scholar

Halberstam, M., ‘Terrorism on the High Seas: The Achille Lauro, Piracy and the IMO Convention on Maritime Safety’, 82 AJIL269, 288 (1988)CrossRef Google Scholar

Ronzitti, N., Rescuing Nationals Abroad through Military Coercion and Intervention on Grounds of Humanity 140–1 (1985)

Geiss, R., ‘Cyber Warfare and Non-International Armed Conflicts’, 43 Is.YHR 149, 159–60 (2013)Google Scholar

Pejić, J., ‘Status of Armed Conflicts’, Perspectives on the ICRC Study on Customary International Humanitarian Law 77, 87 (Wilmshurst, E. and Breau, S. eds., 2007)Google Scholar

Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 45 ILM 1130, 1154 (2006) (US Supreme Court, 2006)

Graham, D.E., ‘Defining Non-International Armed Conflict: A Historically Difficult Task’, 88 ILS, supra note 55, at 43, 51

Moore, J.N., ‘The Lawfulness of Military Assistance to the Republic of Viet-Nam’, 61 AJIL 1, 2–7 (1967)CrossRef Google Scholar

Pejic, J., ‘The Protective Scope of Common Article 3: More than Meets the Eye’, 881 IRRC 189, 193 (2011)Google Scholar

Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 1351 (ICRC, Sandoz, Y. et al. eds., 1987)

Modern Introduction to International Law 318 (7th edn, Malanczuk, P. ed., 1997)

Haines, S., ‘The Nature of War and the Character of Contemporary Armed Conflict’, International Law and the Classification of Conflicts 9, 26 (Wilmshurst, E. ed., 2012)Google Scholar

Geiss, R., ‘Armed Violence in Fragile States: Low-Intensity Conflicts, Spillover Conflicts, and Sporadic Law Enforcement Operations by Third Parties’, 873 IRRC127, 135–7 (2009)Google Scholar

Rogers, A.P.V., Law on the Battlefield 221 (2nd edn, 2004)

Prosecutor v. Akayesu (ICTR, Trial Chamber, 1998)

Prosecutor v. Boškoski et al. (ICTY, Trial Chamber, 2008)

Draper, G.I.A.D., ‘Humanitarian Law and Internal Armed Conflicts’, 13 Ga.JICL253, 270 (1983)Google Scholar

Bellal, A., Giacca, G. and Casey-Maslen, S., ‘International Law and Armed Non-State Actors in Afghanistan’, 881 IRRC47, 55 (2011)CrossRef Google Scholar

Aldrich, G.H., ‘Violations of the Laws or Customs of War’, I Substantive and Procedural Aspects of International Criminal Law: The Experience of International and National Courts 99, 106 n. 30 (McDonald, G.K. and Swaak-Goldman, O. eds., 2000)Google Scholar

Toman, J., The Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict 213 (1996)

Pejic, J., ‘Terrorist Acts and Groups: A Role for International Law?’, 75 BYBIL71, 86 (2004)Google Scholar

Jinks, D., ‘September 11 and the Laws of War’, 28 YJIL 1, 28 (especially n. 191) (2003)Google Scholar

Varol, O.O., ‘The Democratic Coup d’Etat’, 53 HILJ292, 295 (2012)Google Scholar

Abella case (Argentina) (Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, 1997)

Prosecutor v. Tadić (Judgment) (ICTY, Trial Chamber, 1997), 36

ILM 908, 920 (1997). The words ‘banditry, unorganized and short-lived insurrections’ are borrowed from Commentary, I Geneva Convention

Leanza, U. and Sico, L., ‘Compensation for Victims of Maritime Terrorism’, Maritime Terrorism and International Law 97, 100 (Ronzitti, N. ed., 1990)Google Scholar

de Than, C. and Shorts, E., International Criminal Law and Human Rights 162 (2003)

Rona, G., ‘Interesting Times for International Humanitarian Law: Challenges from the “War on Terror”’, 27(2) Fl.FWA55, 63 (2003)Google Scholar

Prosecutor v. Haradinaj et al. (ICTY, Trial Chamber, 2008)

Lieblich, E., International Law and Civil Wars: Intervention and Consent 49 (2013)

Watkin, K., ‘Controlling the Use of Force: A Role for Human Rights Norms in Contemporary Armed Conflict’, 98 AJIL 1, 26 (2004)CrossRef Google Scholar

Ni Aolain, F., ‘The Relationship between Situations of Emergency and Low-Intensity Armed Conflict’, 28 Is.YHR97, 103 (1998)Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.