Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-995ml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T13:24:50.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Nina Tannenwald
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Nuclear Taboo
The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945
, pp. 397 - 430
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annual Report to the President and the Congress (Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense, January 1994).
Ball, George, “How Valid Are the Assumptions Underlying our Vietnam Policies?” memo, October 5, 1964, reprinted in The Atlantic Monthly, 1972, pp. 41–42.
Barrett, David M., ed., Lyndon B. Johnson's Vietnam Papers (College Station: Texas A & M University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Keany, Thomas A., and Elliot, A. Cohen, Gulf War Air Power Survey (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Pentagon Papers: The Defense Department History of United States Decisionmaking on Vietnam, vol. III (Boston: Beacon Press, 1971), Senator Gravel edition.
Public Papers of the President: Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1955 (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1956).
Public Papers of the President: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1963–64, vol. I (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1965).
Public Papers of the Presidents: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1968–69, vol. I (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1970).
Public Papers of the Presidents: Harry S. Truman, 1950 (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1965).
Public Papers of the Presidents: Harry S. Truman, 1953 (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1965).
US Department of Defense, Conduct of the Persian Gulf War: Final Report, 3 vols. (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1992).
US Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945, Conference at Quebec, September 18, 1944 (Washington, DC: 1972).
US Department of State1945, vol. 2, General: Political and Economic Matters (Washington, DC: GPO, 1967).
US Department of State1948, vol. 1, General (Washington, DC: GPO, 1975).
US Department of State1950, vol. 1, National Security Affairs; Foreign and Economic Policy (Washington DC: GPO, 1977).
US Department of State1950, vol. 7, Korea (Washington, DC: GPO, 1976).
US Department of State1951, vol. 7, Korea and China (Washington, DC: GPO, 1983)
US Department of State1952–54, vol. 1, General and Political Matters (Washington, DC: GPO, 1984).
US Department of State1952–54, vol. 2, National Security Affairs, parts 1 and 2 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1984).
US Department of State1952–54, vol. 14, China and Japan, parts 1 and 2 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1985).
US Department of State1952–54, vol. 15, Korea, parts 1 and 2 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1984).
US Department of State1955–57, vol. 19, National Security Policy (Washington, DC: GPO, 1990).
US Department of State1955–57, vol. 20, Regulation of Armaments and Atomic Energy (Washington, DC: GPO, 1990).
US Department of State1961–63, vol. 7, Arms Control and Disarmament (Washington, DC: GPO, 1995).
US Department of State1961–63, vol. 19, South Asia (Washington, DC: GPO, 1996).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 1, Vietnam, 1964 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1992).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 2, Vietnam, January–June 1965 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1996).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 3, Vietnam, June–December 1965 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1996).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 4, Vietnam 1966 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1998).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 5, Vietnam 1967 (Washington, DC: GPO, 2002).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 11, Arms Control and Disarmament (Washington, DC: GPO, 1997).
US Department of State, The Washington Summit: General Secretary Brezhnev's Visit to the United States, June 18–25, 1973, Publication 8733 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1973).
US Strategic Bombing Survey, The Effects of the Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Chairman's Office, 30 June 1946 (Washington, DC: US GPO).
Acheson, Dean, Present at the Creation: My Years at the State Department (New York: Norton, 1969).Google Scholar
Acheson, DeanThe Korean War (New York: Norton, 1971).Google Scholar
Anders, Roger, ed., Forging the Atomic Shield: Excerpts from the Office Diary of Gordon E. Dean (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Baker, James A. III, with DeFrank, Thomas M., The Politics of Diplomacy: Revolution, War and Peace, 1989–1992 (New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1995).Google Scholar
Ball, George, The Past Has Another Pattern: Memoirs (New York: Norton, 1982).Google Scholar
Blum, John Morton, ed., The Price of Vision: The Diary of Henry A. Wallace, 1942–1946 (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1973).Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Zbigniew, Power and Principle: Memoirs of the National Security Advisor, 1977–1981 (New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux, 1983).Google Scholar
Bush, George, and Scowcroft, Brent, A World Transformed (New York: Knopf, 1998).Google Scholar
Bush, Vannevar, Pieces of the Action (New York: William Morrow and Co., 1970).Google Scholar
Carter, Jimmy, Keeping Faith: Memoirs of a President (New York: Bantam, 1982).Google Scholar
Cohen, Samuel T., The Truth About the Neutron Bomb (New York: Morrow, 1983).Google Scholar
Collins, J. Lawton, War in Peacetime: The History and Lessons of Korea (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1969).Google Scholar
Compton, Arthur Holly, Atomic Quest (New York: Oxford University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Eisenhower, Dwight D., Mandate for Change, 1953–56: The White House Years (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1963).Google Scholar
Ellsberg, Daniel, Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers (New York: Viking, 2002).Google Scholar
Gavin, James M. Lt. Gen., War and Peace in the Space Age (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1958).Google Scholar
Groves, Leslie, Now It Can Be Told: The Story of the Manhattan Project (New York: Harper, 1962).Google Scholar
Haig, Alexander M. Jr., Inner Circles: How America Changed the World: A Memoir (New York: Warner Books, 1992).Google Scholar
Haldeman, H. R., with DiMona, Joseph, The Ends of Power (New York: Times Books, 1978).Google Scholar
Haldeman, H. R., with DiMona, JosephThe Haldeman Diaries: Inside the Nixon White House (G. Putnam's Sons, 1994).Google Scholar
Johnson, Lyndon, The Vantage Point: Perspectives of the Presidency, 1963–1969 (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1984, 1971).Google Scholar
Joy, C. Turner, How Communists Negotiate (Santa Monica, CA: Fidelis Publications, 1955, 1970).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A., Years of Upheaval (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1992).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A.The White House Years (Boston: Little, Brown, 1979).Google Scholar
Leahy, William D. Adm., I Was There (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950).Google Scholar
Lilienthal, David E., The Journals of David E. Lilienthal, vol. II (New York: Harper and Row, 1964).Google Scholar
McNamara, Robert, with Mark, Brian, In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam (New York: Times Books, 1995).Google Scholar
Nichols, K. D., The Road to Trinity (New York: William Morrow & Co., 1987).Google Scholar
Nitze, Paul H., with Smith, Ann M. and Rearden, Steven L., From Hiroshima to Glasnost: At the Center of a Decision: A Memoir (London: G. Weidenfeld, 1989).Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard M., No More Vietnams (New York: Arbor House, 1985).Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard M.RN: The Memoirs of Richard Nixon (New York: Grosset and Dunlap, 1978).Google Scholar
Powell, Colin, with Joseph, E. Persico, My American Journey (New York: Random House, 1995).Google Scholar
Rusk, Dean (as told to Richard Rusk), As I Saw It (New York: W. W. Norton, 1990).Google Scholar
Schwarzkopf, H. Norman, with Peter, Petre, It Doesn't Take a Hero (New York: Bantam, 1992).Google Scholar
Smith, Gerard, Disarming Diplomat: The Memoirs of Gerard Smith, Arms Control Negotiator (Lanham, MD: Madison Books, 1996).Google Scholar
Taylor, Maxwell, Swords and Plowshares (New York: Norton, 1972).Google Scholar
Truman, Harry S., Memoirs: Year of Decisions, vol. I (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1955).Google Scholar
Truman, Harry S.Off the Record: The Private Papers of Harry S. Truman, Robert H. Ferrell, ed. (New York: Harper and Row, 1980).Google Scholar
Twining, Nathan, Neither Liberty Nor Safety (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966).Google Scholar
Vance, Cyrus R., Hard Choices: Four Critical Years in America's Foreign Policy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983).Google Scholar
Westmoreland, William C., A Soldier Reports (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1976).Google Scholar
York, Herbert, Making Weapons, Talking Peace (New York: Basic Books, 1987).Google Scholar
Aachen, Christopher, and Snidal, Duncan, “Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies,” World Politics, vol. 41, no. 2 (January 1989), pp. 143–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Gary, and Jeffrey M. Bale, “Al Qa'ida and Weapons of Mass Destruction,” at cns.miis.edu/pubs/other/alqwmd.htm.
Ackland, Len, “Gulf Macho,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 47, no. 1 (January/February 1991), p. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, Kenneth L., The Great Universal Embrace: Arms Summitry – A Skeptic's Account (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989).Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism and World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations, vol. 3, no. 3 (September 1997), pp. 319–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel “Cognitive Evolution: A Dynamic Approach for the Study of International Relations and Their Progress,” in Adler, Emanuel and Crawford, Beverly, eds., Progress in Postwar International Relations (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Agnew, Harold, “A Plan to Lessen Suspicions,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 33, no. 3 (November/December 1997), p. 7.Google Scholar
Albright, David, “South Africa and the Affordable Bomb,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 50, no. 4 (July/August 1994), pp. 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albright, David, and O'Neill, Kevin, “Non-Proliferation: Jury-Rigged but Working,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 1 (January/February 1995), pp. 22–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Thomas, War Games (New York: McGraw Hill, 1987).Google Scholar
Allison, Graham, Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe (New York: Times Books, 2004).Google Scholar
Alperovitz, Gar, Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam: The Use of the Atomic Bomb and the American Confrontation with Soviet Power (London: Pluto, 1994), 2nd expanded edn.Google Scholar
Alperovitz, Gar, and Robert, L. Messer, Barton, Bernstein, “Marshall, Truman, and the Decision to Drop the Bomb,” correspondence in International Security, vol. 16, no. 3 (Winter 1991/92), pp. 204–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, Stephen, Nixon: The Triumph of a Politician: 1962–1972 (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989).Google Scholar
“An American Legacy: Building a Nuclear Weapon Free World,” Final Report, Project on Eliminating Weapons of Mass Destruction (Washington, DC: Henry L. Stimson Center, 1997).
Anders, Roger, ed., Forging the Atomic Shield: Excerpts from the Office Diary of Gordon E. Dean (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Aquino, Michael A., “ The Neutron Bomb,” Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1980.Google Scholar
Arbatov, Alexei, “Russian Military Doctrine and Nuclear Forces to the Year 2000 and Beyond,” paper presented at the Conference on Russian Defense Policy Towards the Year 2000, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, March 26–27, 1997.
Arbman, Gunnar, and Charles Thornton, “Russia's Tactical Nuclear Weapons: Part I, Background and Policy Issues,” Swedish Defense Research Agency, FOI-R-1057-SE (November 2003), at www.cissm.umd.edu/documents/thorntonrussia.pdf.
Arkin, William M., “Flying Solo,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 54, no. 6 (November/December 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkin, William M.Calculated Ambiguity: Nuclear Weapons and the Gulf War,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 4 (1996), pp. 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkin, William M.Inarticulating Nuclear Policy,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 1 (January/February 1995), p. 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkin, William M.U. S. Nukes in the Gulf,” The Nation, vol. 251, no. 23 (December 31, 1990), pp. 834–36.Google Scholar
Arkin, William, Handler, Joshua, and Durrant, Damian, U. S. Nuclear Weapons in the Persian Gulf Crisis (Washington, DC: Greenpeace, January 1991).Google Scholar
Art, Robert, “The United States, Nuclear Weapons and Grand Strategy,” in Karp, Regina Cowan, ed., Security With Nuclear Weapons? Different Perspectives on National Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 57–99.Google Scholar
Asada, Sadao, “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan's Decision to Surrender – a Reconsideration,” Pacific Historical Review, vol. 67, no. 4 (November 1998), pp. 477–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ascherio, Alberto, et al., “The Effects of the Gulf War on Infant and Child Mortality in Iraq,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 327, no. 13 (1992), pp. 931–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Rick, Crusade: The Untold Story of the Persian Gulf War (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1993).Google Scholar
Atwood, David C., “Mobilizing Around the United Nations Special Sessions on Disarmament,” in Smith, Jackie, Chatfield, Charles, and Pugnucco, Ron, eds., Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1997), 141–58.Google Scholar
Auger, Vincent A., The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Analysis: The Carter Administration and the Neutron Bomb (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996).Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, “The Evolutionary Creation of Norms,” American Political Science Review, vol. 80, no. 4 (December 1986), pp. 1095–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayewah, Isaac E., “The Treaty on the Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone in Africa (The Pelindaba Treaty),” in Alves, Pericles Gasparini and Cipollone, Daiana Belinda, eds., Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones in the 21st Century (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1997), 55–58.Google Scholar
Baaro, Makurita, “The South Pacific Nuclear-Free Zone Treaty,” in Alves, Pericles Gasparini and Cipollone, Daiana Belinda, eds., Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones in the 21st Century (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1997), 49–54.Google Scholar
Ball, George, “The Cosmic Bluff,” New York Review of Books, July 1983, pp. 37–38.Google Scholar
Barkun, Michael, Law Without Sanctions: Order in Primitive Societies and the World Community (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Barnaby, Frank, How Nuclear Weapons Spread: Nuclear Weapons Proliferation in the 1990s (London: Routledge, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, John, “The Nuclear Option: Thinking the Unthinkable,” Newsweek, January 14, 1991, p. 17.Google Scholar
Bennett, Gordon C., The New Abolitionists: The Story of Nuclear Free Zones (Elgin, IL: Brethen, 1987).Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Luckmann, Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality (New York: Anchor Books, 1967).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J., “A Postwar Myth: 500,000 U. S. Lives Saved,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 42, no. 4 (June/July 1986), pp. 38–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Ike and Hiroshima: Did He Oppose It?” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 10 (September 1987), pp. 377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Eclipsed by Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Early Thinking About Tactical Nuclear Weapons,” International Security, vol. 15, no. 4 (Spring 1991), pp. 149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.The Atomic Bombings Reconsidered,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 74, no. 1 (January 1995), pp. 135–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Compelling Japan's Surrender Without the A-bomb, Soviet Entry or Invasion: Reconsidering the U. S. Bombing Survey's Early Surrender Conclusions,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 18, no. 2 (1995), pp. 54–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Understanding the Atomic Bomb and the Japanese Surrender: Missed Opportunities, Little-Known Near Disasters, and Modern Memory,” Diplomatic History, vol. 19, no. 2 (Spring 1995), pp. 227–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J. “Doing Nuclear History: Treating Scholarship Fairly and Interpreting Pre-Hiroshima Thinking About ‘Radioactive Poisoning’,” Newsletter – Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, September 1996, pp. 17–43.
Bernstein, Barton J.Truman and the A-Bomb: Targeting Noncombatants, Using the Bomb, and His Defending the ‘Decision’,” Journal of Military History, vol. 62 (July 1998), pp. 547–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Reconsidering Truman's Claim of ‘Half A Million Lives Saved’ by the Atomic Bomb: The Construction and Deconstruction of a Myth,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 22, no. 1 (1999), pp. 101–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, Richard K., Nuclear Blackmail and Nuclear Balance (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1987).Google Scholar
Biddle, Steve D., and Feaver, Peter D., eds., Battlefield Nuclear Weapons: Issues and Options, Occasional Paper No. 5 (Cambridge, MA: Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, 1989).Google Scholar
Biersteker, Thomas J., and Weber, Cynthia, eds., State Sovereignty as Social Contract (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Bilmes, Jack, Discourse and Behavior (New York: Plenum Press, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Kai, The Color of Truth: McGeorge Bundy and William Bundy, Brothers in Arms (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1998).Google Scholar
Blackaby, Frank, Goldblat, Jozef, and Lodgaard, Sverre, eds., No First Use, SIPRI (London: Taylor and Francis, 1984).Google Scholar
Blacker, Coit, and Duffy, Gloria, International Arms Control: Issues and Agreements (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Blight, James G., ed., Missed Opportunities? Revisiting the Decisions of the Vietnam War, 1945–68, Hanoi Conference, June 20–23, 1997. Transcript, Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, 1998.Google Scholar
Blight, James G.The Shattered Crystal Ball: Fear and Learning in the Cuban Missile Crisis (Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1990).Google Scholar
Bowie, Robert R., and Immerman, Richard H., Waging Peace: How Eisenhower Shaped an Enduring Cold War Strategy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Boyer, Paul, By the Bomb's Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age (New York: Pantheon Books, 1985).Google Scholar
Boyer, PaulFallout: A Historian Reflects on America's Half-Century Encounter with Nuclear Weapons (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
“Briefing Book on Tactical Nuclear Weapons” (January 2003) at www.armscontrolcenter.org/prolifproject/tnw/index.html.
Brands, H. W. Jr., “Testing Massive Retaliation: Credibility and Crisis Management in the Taiwan Strait,” International Security, vol. 12, no. 4 (Spring 1988), pp. 121–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, Bernard, War and Politics (New York: Macmillan, 1973).Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard, ed., The Absolute Weapon:Atomic Power and World Order (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1946).Google Scholar
Broscious, David, “Longing for International Control, Banking on American Superiority: Harry S. Truman's Approach to Nuclear Weapons,” in Gaddis, John Lewiset al., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb: Nuclear Diplomacy Since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhite, Russell D., and Hamel, Christopher W., “War for Peace: The Question of an American Preventive War Against the Soviet Union, 1945–1955,” Diplomatic History, vol. 14, no. 3 (1990), pp. 367–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Builder, Carl H., and Graubard, Morlie H., The International Law of Armed Conflict: Implications for the Concept of Assured Destruction (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1982).Google Scholar
Bundy, McGeorge, Danger and Survival: Decisions About the Bomb in the First Fifty Years (New York: Random House, 1988).Google Scholar
Bundy, McGeorgeNuclear Weapons and the Gulf,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 70, no. 4 (Fall 1991), pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
Bundy, McGeorge, McNamara, Robert S., Smith, Gerard, and Kennan, George, “Nuclear Weapons and the Atlantic Alliance,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 60, no. 4 (Spring 1982), pp. 753–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundy, William, A Tangled Web: The Making of Foreign Policy in the Nixon Presidency (New York: Hill and Wang, 1998).Google Scholar
Bunn, George, Arms Control By Committee: Managing Negotiations with the Russians (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Bunn, George “Evolution of the Issue of No First Use of Nuclear Weapons,” unpublished manuscript (April 1982).
Bunn, GeorgeUS Law of Nuclear Weapons,” Naval War College Review, vol. 32, no. 4 (July/August 1984), pp. 46–62.Google Scholar
Bunn, George “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Codifying Nuclear Deterrence?” Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Pugwash Symposium on the Arms Race and International Law (1983).
Burnham, James, The Struggle for the World (New York: The John Day Co., 1947).Google Scholar
Burr, William, “U.S Nuclear History: Nuclear Arms and Politics in the Missile Age 1955–1968,” Digital National Security Archive at http://nsarchive.chadwyck.com/collections/nh_essay.jsp
Burr, William, “The Nixon Administration, the ‘Horror Strategy,’ and the Search for Limited Nuclear Options, 1969–1972,” Journal of Cold War Studies, vol. 7, no. 3 (Summer 2005), pp. 34–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, William, and Kimball, Jeffrey, “Nixon's Secret Nuclear Alert: Vietnam War Diplomacy and the Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test, October 1969,” Cold War History, vol. 3, no. 2 (January 2003), pp. 113–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Richard, “Defense and Arms Control: Defining the Problem,” in Bernard, F. Halloran, ed., Essays on Arms Control and National Security (US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Washington, DC, 1986), pp. 187–210.Google Scholar
Byrne, Paul, The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (London: Croom Helm, 1988).Google Scholar
Campbell, David, Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics and the Narratives of the Gulf War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1993).Google Scholar
Cancian, Francesca, What Are Norms? A Study of Beliefs and Action in a Maya Community (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Carnesale, Albert, et al., Living With Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Carter, April, Peace Movements: International Protests and World Politics Since 1945 (London: Longman, 1992).Google Scholar
Catudal, Honore M., Soviet Strategy from Stalin to Gorbachev (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities, 1989).Google Scholar
Cerniello, Craig, “Clinton Issues New Guidelines on U. S. Nuclear Weapons Doctrine,” Arms Control Today, vol. 27, no. 8 (November/December 1997), p. 23.Google Scholar
“The Challenge of Peace: God's Promise and Our Response,” A Pastoral Letter on War and Peace, May 3, 1983, National Conference of Catholic Bishops (Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference, 1983).
Chang, Gordon H., “To the Brink: Eisenhower, Dulles and the Quemoy–Matsu Crisis,” International Security, vol. 12, no. 4 (Spring 1988), pp. 96–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauvistre, Eric, The Implications of IAEA Inspections under Security Council Resolution 687 (New York: United Nations, 1992).Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, “An Inquiry into the Workings of Arms Control Agreements,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 85, no. 5 (March 1972), pp. 905–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Antonia Handler, and Abram Chayes, “Nonproliferation Regimes in the Aftermath of the Gulf War,” in Nye, Joseph and Smith, Roger, eds., After the Storm: Lessons from the Gulf War, The Aspen Institute (Lanham, MD: Madison Books, 1992), pp. 49–80.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T., “Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 43 (1999), pp. 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
China's Nuclear Policy, the Nuclear Threat Initiative, at www.nti.org/db/china/index/html.
Cillessen, Bret J., “Embracing the Bomb: Ethics, Morality and Nuclear Deterrence in the US Air Force, 1945–55,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 21, no. 1 (March 1998), pp. 96–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirincione, Joseph, ed., Repairing the Regime: Preventing the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction (New York: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
Claude, Inis L. Jr., “Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations,” International Organization, vol. 20, no. 3 (Summer 1966), pp. 367–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, Peter, Nonproliferation and the National Interest: America's Response to the Spread of Nuclear Weapons (New York: HarperCollins, 1993).Google Scholar
Clodfelter, Mark, The Limits of Air Power: The American Bombing of Vietnam (New York: Free Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Cohen, Avner, Israel and the Bomb (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Cohen, Avner “Israel and the Nuclear Taboo,” unpublished paper, University of Maryland, 1999.
Cohen, Roger, and Gatti, Claudio, In the Eye of the Storm: The Life of General H. Norman Schwarzkopf (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1991).Google Scholar
Cohen, Sheldon, Arms and Judgement: Law, Morality and the Conduct of War in the 20th Century (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Cole, Leonard A., The Eleventh Plague: The Politics of Biological and Chemical Warfare (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1997).Google Scholar
Collina, Tom Zamora, “South Africa Bridges the Gap,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 5 (July/August 1995), pp. 27–31.Google Scholar
Cordesman, Anthony H., “Radiological Weapons as a Means of Attack,” November 30, 2001, at www.csis.org/burke/hd/reports/ radiological.pdf.
Cortwright, David, Peace Works: The Citizen's Role in Ending the Cold War (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1993).Google Scholar
Cousins, Norman, “The Literacy of Survival,” The Saturday Review, September 14, 1946, p. 14.Google Scholar
Craig, Campbell, Destroying the Village: Eisenhower and Thermonuclear War (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Crane, Conrad C., “To Avert Impending Disaster: American Military Plans to Use Atomic Weapons During the Korean War,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 23, no. 2 (June 2000), pp. 72–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daalder, Ivo H., The Nature and Practice of Flexible Response (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
D'Amato, Anthony, The Concept of Custom in International Law (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Boer, Connie, “The Polls: Our Commitment to WWIII,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 1 (Spring 1981), pp. 126–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boer, ConnieThe Polls: The European Peace Movement and the Deployment of Nuclear Missiles,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 1 (Spring 1985), pp. 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Jonathan, and Laurenti, Jeffrey, Options and Opportunities: Arms Control and Disarmament for the 21st Century (New York: United Nations Association, 1997).Google Scholar
Decosse, David E., ed., But Was it Just? Reflections on the Morality of the Persian Gulf War (New York: Doubleday, 1992).Google Scholar
Deery, Phillip, “The Dove Flies East: Whitehall, Warsaw, and the 1950 World Peace Congress,” Australian Journal of Politics and History, vol. 48, no. 2 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewes, Kate, and Green, Robert, “The World Court Project: History and Consequences,” Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, vol. 7, no. 1 (Fall 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanapala, Jayantha with Rydell, Randy, Multilateral Diplomacy and the NPT: An Insider's Account (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 2005).Google Scholar
Diamond, Howard, “India Releases Nuclear Doctrine, Looks to Emulate P-5 Arsenals,” Arms Control Today, vol. 29, no. 5 (July/August 1999), p. 23.Google Scholar
Dingman, Roger, “Atomic Diplomacy During the Korean War,” International Security, vol. 13, no. 3 (Winter 1988/89), pp. 50–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divine, Robert, Blowing on the Wind: The Nuclear Test Ban Debate, 1954–1960 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Dockrill, Saki, Eisenhower's New-Look National Security Policy, 1953–61 (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (London: Routledge, 1966/95).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dower, John W., War Without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War (New York: Pantheon Books, 1986).Google Scholar
Dowler, Thomas W., and Howard, Joseph S. II, “Countering the Threat of the Well-Armed Tyrant: A Modest Proposal for Small Nuclear Weapons,” Strategic Review, vol. 19, no. 4 (Fall 1991), pp. 34–40.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael, “Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 12, no. 3 (1983), pp. 205–35.Google Scholar
Draper, Theodore, “How Not to Think About Nuclear War,” New York Review of Books, vol. 29, July 15, 1982.Google Scholar
Drell, Sidney, Goodby, James, Jeanloz, Raymond, and Peurifoy, Robert, “A Strategic Choice: New Bunker Busters Versus Nonproliferation,” Arms Control Today, vol. 33, no. 2 (March 2003), p. 8.Google Scholar
Dulles, John Foster, “Challenge and Response in United States Policy,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 36, no. 1 (October 1957), pp. 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Lewis A., “Global Nuclear Order in an Era of Proliferation,” in Gottemueller, Rose, ed., Strategic Arms Control in the Post-START Era, IISS (London: Brassey's, 1992).Google Scholar
Dunnigan, James F., and Bay, Austin, From Shield to Storm: High-Tech Weapons, Military Strategy and Coalition Warfare in the Persian Gulf (New York: William Morrow & Co., 1992).Google Scholar
Dyson, Freeman, Disturbing the Universe (New York: Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar
Eden, Lynn, Constructing Destruction: Organizations, Knowledge, and the Effects of Nuclear Weapons (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Ederington, L. Benjamin, , and Mazarr, Michael J., eds., Turning Point: The Gulf War and U. S. Military Strategy (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, JonSocial Norms and Economic Theory,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 3, no. 4 (Fall 1989), pp. 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enthoven, Alain C., “1963 Nuclear Strategy Revisited,” in Henry, P. Ford and Francis, X. Winters, , S. J., eds., Ethics and Nuclear Strategy? (Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 1977), pp. 72–81.Google Scholar
Epstein, William, “NPT Wrap-Up: Indefinite Extension – With Increased Accountability,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 4 (July/August 1995), pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
Epstein, William “Tlatelolco and a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World,” in Pericles Alves, Gasparini and Cipollone, Daiana Belinda, eds., Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones in the 21st Century (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1997), pp. 23–27.Google Scholar
Erdmann, Andrew P. N., “War No Longer Has Any Logic Whatever: Dwight D. Eisenhower and the Thermonuclear Revolution,” in Gaddis, John Lewiset al., eds., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, Hazel Gaudet, “The Polls: Atomic Weapons and Nuclear Energy,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 27 (1963), pp. 155–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew, Innovation and the Arms Race: How the United States and the Soviet Union Develop New Military Technologies (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Evangelista, MatthewUnarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, “The Special Challenge of Our Times: Cultural Norms Related to Nuclearism,” in Westing, Arthur, ed., Cultural Norms, War and the Environment, SIPRI (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 53–63.Google Scholar
Falk, RichardNuclear Weapons, International Law and the World Court: A Historic Encounter,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 91, no. 64 (1997), pp. 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Richard, Meyrowitz, Elliot, and Sanderson, Jack, Legal Order in a Violent World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, Elliot Meyrowitz, and Jack SandersonNuclear Weapons and International Law, Occasional Paper No. 10 (Center of International Studies, Princeton University, 1981).
Farley, Philip, “Strategic Arms Control, 1967–87,” in George, Alexanderet al., eds., U. S.–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 215–53.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo and Helene, Lambert, “Courting Controversy: International Law, National Norms and American Nuclear Use,” Review of International Studies, vol. 27 (2001), pp. 309–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearey, Bryan L., White, Paul C., Ledger, John St., and Immele, John D., “An Analysis of Reduced Collateral Damage Nuclear Weapons,” Comparative Strategy, vol. 22, no. 4 (October/November 2003), pp. 304–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James, “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,” World Politics, vol. 43 (January 1991), pp. 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federov, Yuri, “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Russia's Doctrine on Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Pugwash Conference, London, November 2002.
Feifer, George, Tennozan: The Battle for Okinawa and the Atomic Bomb (New York: Ticknor & Fields, 1992).Google Scholar
Feis, Herbert, Japan Subdued: The Atomic Bomb and the End of the Cold War in the Pacific (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Findlay, Trevor, Nuclear Dynamite: The Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Fiasco (Sydney: Brassey's Australia, 1990).Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4 (1998), pp. 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firmage, Edwin Brown, “The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 63, no. 4 (October 1969), pp. 729–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Catherine, Reformation and Resistance: Nongovernmental Organizations and the Future of Nuclear Weapons, Report No. 29 (Washington, DC: Henry L. Stimson Center, 1999).Google Scholar
FitzGerald, Frances, Way Out There in the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars, and the End of the Cold War (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000).Google Scholar
Florini, Ann, “The Evolution of International Norms,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 3 (September 1996), pp. 363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Rosemary, The Practice of Power: US Relations With China since 1949 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Foot, RosemaryThe Wrong War: American Policy and Dimensions of the Korean Conflict (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Foot, RosemaryNuclear Coercion and the Ending of the Korean Conflict,” International Security, vol. 13 (Winter 1988–89), pp. 92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish (New York: Vintage, 1977).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, Deterrence (Cambridge: Polity, 2004).Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy (New York: St. Martin's, 1989), 2nd edn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, and Karsh, Efraim, The Gulf Conflict, 1990–91 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Fried, John H. E., “First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Existing Prohibitions in International Law,” Bulletin of Peace Proposals, vol. 1 (1981).Google Scholar
Frye, Alton, “Slow Fuse on the Neutron Bomb,” Foreign Policy, no. 31 (Summer 1978), pp. 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Hisakaju, International Regulation of the Use of Nuclear Weapons (Osaka, Japan: Kansai University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Furguson, Charles D., and Potter, William C., The Four Faces of Nuclear Terrorism (Monterey: Monterey Institute, Center for Nonproliferation Studies, 2004).Google Scholar
Fursenko, Aleksandr, and Naftali, Timothy, One Hell of a Gamble: Khrushchev, Castro, and Kennedy, 1958–1964 (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997).Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis, “The Origins of Self-Deterrence: The United States and the Nonuse of Nuclear Weapons, 1945–1958,” in Gaddis, , The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 104–46.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis “The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in the Postwar International System,” in Gaddis, , The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 215–45.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John LewisWe Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis, Gordon, Philip H., May, Ernest R., and Rosenberg, Jonathan, eds., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb: Nuclear Diplomacy since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaiduk, Ilya, The Soviet Union and the Vietnam War (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1996).Google Scholar
Gallicchio, Marc, “After Nagasaki: General Marshall's Plan for the Use of Tactical Nuclear Weapons,” Prologue: Quarterly of the National Archives, vol. 24, no. 4 (Winter 1991), pp. 396–404.Google Scholar
Ganapathy, Arumugam, “The Treaty on the South-East Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone,” in Alves, Pericles Gasparini and Cipollone, Daiana Belinda, eds., Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones in the 21st Century (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1997), pp. 59–62.Google Scholar
Gardner, Gary T., Nuclear Non-Proliferation: A Primer (Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner, 1994).Google Scholar
Garthoff, Raymond, Détente and Confrontation: American–Soviet Relations from Nixon to Reagan (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1994), rev. edn.Google Scholar
Gaskins, Richard H., Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Gehring, Verna, “The Nuclear Taboo,” Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, Summer 2000, at www.puaf.umd.edu/IPPP/Summer00/nuclear_taboo.htm.
Geiger, H. Jack, “Bomb Now, Die Later: The Consequences of Infrastructure Destruction for Iraqi Civilians in the Gulf War,” in O'Loughlin, John, Meyer, Tom, and Greenberg, Edward, eds., War and its Consequences: Lessons from the Persian Gulf Conflict (New York: HarperCollins, 1994).Google Scholar
Geller, Daniel S., “Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, and Crisis Escalation,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 34, no. 2 (June 1990), pp. 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentile, Gian P., “Advocacy or Assessment? The United States Strategic Bombing Survey of Germany and Japan,” Pacific Historical Review, vol. 66 (February 1997), pp. 53–79.Google Scholar
Girrier, Catherine, The No-First-Use Issue in American Nuclear Weapons Policy: 1945–1957 (Memoire de diplome, Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales, Geneva, 1985).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., “U. S.–Soviet Efforts to Cooperate in Crisis Management and Crisis Avoidance,” in Alexander, L. George, Farley, Philip, and Dallin, Alexander, eds., U. S.–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 581–99.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Richard, Smoke, Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice (New York: Columbia University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., Farley, Philip, and Dallin, Alexander, eds., US–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Germany Raises No-First-Use Issue at NATO Meeting,” Arms Control Today, vol. 28, no. 8 (November/December 1998), p. 24.
Gest, Howard, “The July 1945 Szilard Petition on the Atomic Bomb: Memoir by a Signer in Oak Ridge,” undated manuscript at www.bio.indiana.edu/Gest/HGSzilard.html.
Gittinger, Ted, ed., The Johnson Years: A Vietnam Roundtable (Austin, TX: Lyndon Baines Johnson Library: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, 1993).Google Scholar
Gizewski, Peter, “From Winning Weapon to Destroyer of the World: The Nuclear Taboo in International Politics,” International Journal, vol. 51, no. 2 (Summer 1996), pp. 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Charles L., “The Flawed Case for Nuclear Disarmament,” Survival, vol. 40, no. 4 (Spring 1998), pp. 112–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Charles L., and Steve Fetter, , “National Missile Defense and the Future of U. S. Nuclear Weapons Policy,” International Security, vol. 26, no. 1 (Summer 2001), pp. 40–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasstone, Samuel, and Dolan, P. J., eds., Effects of Nuclear Weapons (Washington, DC: US Department of Defense and Energy Research and Development Administration, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Stanley, “What Did Truman Know, and When Did He Know It?” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 54, no. 3 (May/June 1998), pp. 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldblat, Jozef, “Issues Facing the 1995 NPT Extension Conference,” Security Dialogue, vol. 23, no. 4 (1992).Google Scholar
Goldblat, Jozef “Making Nuclear Weapons Illegal,” in Steinberger, Jack, Udgaonkar, Bhalchandra, and Rotblat, Joseph, eds., A Nuclear-Weapon-Free World (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993), pp. 153–68.Google Scholar
Goldblat, Jozef “Prospects for a Ban on the Use of Nuclear Weapons,” paper presented at the Third International Security Forum Zurich, Switzerland October 1998.
Gong, Gerrit, The Standard of Civilization in International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael R., and Trainor, General Bernard E., The General's War: The Inside Story of the Conflict in the Gulf (Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co., 1995).Google Scholar
Gormley, Dennis M., and Mahnken, Thomas G., “Facing Nuclear and Conventional Reality,” Orbis, vol. 44, no. 1 (Winter 2000), pp. 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottemueller, Rose, ed., Strategic Arms Control in the Post-START Era, IISS (London: Brassey's, 1992).Google Scholar
Gottfried, Kurt, Kendall, Henry W. M, and Lee, John M., “‘No First Use’ of Nuclear Weapons,” Scientific American, vol. 250, no. 3 (March 1984), pp. 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Thomas W., American Public Opinion on NATO, Extended Deterrence, and the Use of Nuclear Weapons: Future Fission?, CSIA Occasional Paper No. 4 (Cambridge, MA: Center for Science and International Affairs, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, and University Press of America, 1989).Google Scholar
Graham, Thomas, “Strengthening Arms Control,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 2 (Spring 2000), pp. 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Colin S., Nuclear Strategy and National Style (Lanham, MD: Hamilton Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gray, Colin S.An International ‘Norm’ Against Nuclear Weapons? The British Case,” Comparative Strategy, vol. 20 (2001), pp. 231–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenpeace, , Iraqi Deaths From the Gulf War as of December 1991 (Greenpeace, 1991).Google Scholar
Gusterson, Hugh, “Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination,” Cultural Anthropology, vol. 14, no. 1 (1999), pp. 111–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halperin, Morton H., “Proposal for a Ban on the Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Institute for Defense Analyses, Special Studies Group, Study Memorandum No. 4 (Washington, DC: IDA, 1961).
Halperin, Morton H., Limited War in the Nuclear Age (New York: Wiley, 1963).Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell, One for All: The Logic of Group Conflict (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Harwit, Martin, An Exhibit Denied: Lobbying the History of the Enola Gay (New York: Copernicus Books, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselkorn, Avigdor, The Continuing Storm: Iraq, Poisonous Weapons and Deterrence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Hashmi, Sohail H., and Lee, Steven P., eds., Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Religious and Secular Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Peter, Pacific Powderkeg: American Nuclear Dilemmas in Korea (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1991).Google Scholar
Hayes, Peter, and Tannenwald, Nina, “Nixing Nukes in Vietnam,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 59, no. 3 (May/June 2003), pp. 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidenrich, John G., “The Gulf War: How Many Iraqis Died?” Foreign Policy, no. 90 (Spring 1993), pp. 108–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herken, Gregg, The Winning Weapon: The Atomic Bomb in the Cold War (New York: Knopf, 1981).Google Scholar
Herken, GreggCounsels of War (New York: Knopf, 1985).Google Scholar
Herken, GreggCardinal Choices: Presidential Science Advising from the Atomic Bomb to SDI (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Herring, George, America's Longest War: The United States and Vietnam, 1950–1975 (New York: Wiley, 1996), 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Herron, Kerry G., and Jenkis-Smith, Hank C., Public Perspectives on Nuclear Security: U. S. National Security Surveys, 1993–1997 (Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Institute for Public Policy, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersey, John, “Hiroshima,” New Yorker, August 31, 1946.Google Scholar
Hersh, Seymour M., The Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House (New York: Summit Books, 1983).Google Scholar
Hershberg, James G., James B. Conant: Harvard to Hiroshima and the Making of the Nuclear Age (New York: Knopf, 1993).Google Scholar
Hershberg, James G.A Footnote on Hiroshima and Atomic Morality: Conant, Niebuhr, and an ‘Emotional’ Clergyman, 1945–46,” Newsletter – Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations (December 2002).Google Scholar
Heuser, Beatrice, The Bomb: Nuclear Weapons in their Historic, Strategic and Ethical Context (London: Longmans, 2000).Google Scholar
Higuchi, Toshihiro, “Clean' Bombs: Nuclear Technology and Nuclear Strategy in the 1950s,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 29, no. 1 (February 2006), pp. 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Bruce, “Terrorists and WMD: Some Preliminary Hypotheses,” Nonproliferation Review, vol. 4, no. 3 (Spring–Summer 1997), pp. 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Stanley, Duties Beyond Borders (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Hoodbhoy, Pervez, and Zia Mian, “The India–Pakistan conflict – Towards the Failure of Nuclear Deterrence,” Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad and Princeton University, September 2002, www.gakushuin.ac.jp/~881791/hoodbhoy/Deterrence.html.
Horner, Charles A., “Policy Consideration in Using Nuclear Weapons,” Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, vol. 8, no. 7 (1997), pp. 15–21.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael, Andreopoulos, George J., and Shulman, Mark R., eds., The Laws of War: Constraints on Warfare in the Western World (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel, “The Clash of Civilizations,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, no. 3 (Summer 1993), pp. 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikle, Fred Charles, “NATO's First Nuclear Use: A Deepening Trap?” Strategic Review, vol. 8 (Winter 1980), pp. 18–38.Google Scholar
Immerman, Richard, “Eisenhower and Dulles: Who Made the Decisions?” Political Psychology, vol. 1, no. 2 (1979), pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglis, D. R. and Sandler, C. L., “A Special Report on Plowshare: Problems and Prospects: The Non-military Use of Nuclear Explosives,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 23, no. 10 (1967), pp. 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Jason Division: Division Consultants Who Are Also Professors are Attacked,” Science, February 2, 1973, pp. 459–62, 505.
Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Jervis, RobertCooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics, vol. 30, no. 2 (January 1978), pp. 167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, RobertDeterrence Theory Revisited,” World Politics, vol. 31, no. 2 (January 1979), pp. 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, RobertThe Illogic of American Nuclear Strategy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Jervis, RobertThe Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Jervis, RobertThe Military History of the Cold War,” Diplomatic History, vol. 15, no. 1 (Winter 1991), pp. 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert, Lebow, Richard Ned, and Stein, Janice Gross, eds., Psychology and Deterrence (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Jian, Chen, “China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964–69,” The China Quarterly, no. 142 (June 1995), pp. 356–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jochnick, Chris af, and Normand, Roger, “The Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Laws of War,” Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 35, no. 49 (Winter 1994), pp. 49–95.Google Scholar
Joffe, Joseph, “Peace and Populism: Why the European Anti-nuclear Movement Failed,” International Security, vol. 11, no. 4 (Spring 1987), pp. 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, James Turner, Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Johnson, Rebecca, “NPT Report: The 2002 Prepcom: Papering Over the Cracks?” Disarmament Diplomacy, no. 64 (May/June 2002).Google Scholar
Kahn, Herman, “Nuclear Proliferation and Rules of Retaliation,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 76, no. 1 (November 1966), pp. 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Herman, “Thinking About Nuclear Morality,” New York Times Magazine, June 13, 1982.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W., “Nuclear Weapons and the Rule of Law,” NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, vol. 31, no. 2 (Winter/Spring 1999), pp. 349–415.Google Scholar
Kaiser, David, American Tragedy: Kennedy, Johnson and the Origins of the Vietnam War (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Kalb, Marvin, and Kalb, Bernard, Kissinger (Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co., 1974).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Fred, “JFK's First Strike Plan,” vol. 288, no. 3, The Atlantic Monthly (October 2001), pp. 81–86.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Fred, The Wizards of Armageddon (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983).Google Scholar
Kapur, Ashok, “Non-Proliferation: Western Biases,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 1 (January/February 1995), pp. 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, Regina Cowan, ed., Security With Nuclear Weapons? Different Perspectives on National Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Katz, Milton S., Ban The Bomb: A History of SANE: the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy, 1957–1985 (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1986).Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, and Okawara, Nobuo, “Japan, Asian-Pacific Security and the Case for Analytical Eclectism,” International Security, vol. 26, no. 3 (Winter 2001/02), pp. 153–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, Alexander Wendt, and Ronald Jepperson, “Norms, Identity and Culture in National Security,” in Katzenstein, Peter, ed., The Culture of National Security (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), pp. 33–75.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, William W., “The Requirements of Deterrence,” in Kaufman, , ed., Military Policy and National Security (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1956), pp. 12–38.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, William W.The McNamara Strategy (New York: Harper & Row, 1964).Google Scholar
Keal, Paul, Unspoken Rules and Superpower Dominance (New York: St. Martin's, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kegley, Charles W. Jr. and Raymond, Gregory A., “Normative Constraints on the Use of Force Short of War,” Journal of Peace Research, vol. 23, no. 3 (September 1986), pp. 213–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegley, Charles, and Schwab, Kenneth L., eds., After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Keller, Bill, “The Second Nuclear Age,” New York Times Magazine, May 4, 2003.Google Scholar
Keeley, James F., “Toward a Foucauldian Analysis of International Regimes,” International Organization, vol. 44, no. 1 (Winter 1989–90), pp. 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen Foong, Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Kier, Elizabeth, and Mercer, Jonathan, “Setting Precedents in Anarchy: Military Intervention and Weapons of Mass Destruction,” International Security, vol. 20, no. 4 (Spring 1996), pp. 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, Jeffrey, Nixon's Vietnam War (Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 1998).Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A., Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A.Diplomacy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994).Google Scholar
Klare, Michael T., “High-Death Weapons of the Gulf War,” The Nation, vol. 252, no. 21, June 3, 1991, pp. 721–42.Google Scholar
Kleidman, Robert, Organizing for Peace: Neutrality, the Test Ban, and the Freeze (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie, “Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U. S. Sanctions against South Africa,” International Organization, vol. 49, no. 3 (Summer 1995), pp. 451–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knopf, Jeffrey W., Domestic Society and International Cooperation: The Impact of Protest on U. S. Arms Control Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Koblentz, Gregory, “Pathogens as Weapons: The International Security Implications of Biological Warfare,” International Security, vol. 28, no. 3 (Winter 2003/04), pp. 84–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kort, Michael, “Casualty Projections for the Invasion of Japan, Phantom Estimates, and the Math of Barton Bernstein,” Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations Newsletter (December 2003).Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V., Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Keith, “Multilateral Diplomacy, Norm Building and UN Conferences: The Case of Small Arms and Light Weapons,” Global Governance, vol. 8 (2002), pp. 247–63.Google Scholar
Kristensen, Hans M., U. S. Nuclear Strategy Reform in the 1990s, Nautilus Institute Working Paper (March 2000).
Lang, Daniel, “A Reporter at Large,” The New Yorker, June 8, 1946, p. 62.Google Scholar
Larsen, Jeffrey A., ed., Arms Control and a Changing Environment (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002)Google Scholar
Lavoy, Peter R., Sagan, Scott D., and Wirtz, James J., Planning the Unthinkable: How New Nuclear Powers Will Use Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Weapons (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, “The Cuban Missile Crisis: Reading the Lessons Correctly,” Political Science Quarterly, vol. 98 (Fall 1983), pp. 431–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, and Gross Stein, Janice, We All Lost the Cold War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, and Gross Stein, JaniceRational Deterrence Theory: I Think, Therefore I Deter,” World Politics, vol. 41, no. 2 (January 1989), pp. 208–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Steven P., Morality, Prudence, and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leffler, Melvyn, A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W., Cooperation Under Fire: Anglo-German Restraint During World War II (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Lettow, Paul, Ronald Reagan and his Quest to Make Nuclear Weapons Obsolete (New York: Random House, 2006).Google Scholar
Levi, Michael, “Nuclear Bunker Buster Bombs,” Scientific American, vol. 291, no. 2 (August 2004), pp. 66–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, David K., Convention: A Philosophical Study (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Lewis, George, “The Future of U. S. Nonstrategic Forces,” in Flournoy, Michele, ed., Nuclear Weapons After the Cold War: Guidelines for U. S. Policy (New York: HarperCollins, 1993), pp. 104–40.Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael W., “The Law of Aerial Bombardment in the 1991 Gulf War,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 97, no. 3 (July 2003), pp. 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifton, Robert J., and Mitchell, Greg, Hiroshima in America: Fifty Years of Denial (New York: Putnam's, 1995).Google Scholar
Little, Daniel, “Rational Choice Theory,” in Varieties of Social Explanation (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991).
Lockwood, Dunbar, “Nuclear Posture Review Shows Little Change in Policies,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 9 (November 1994), pp. 27, 32.Google Scholar
Lockwood, DunbarThe Status of U. S., Russian, and Chinese Nuclear Forces in Northeast Asia,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 9 (November 1994), pp. 21–24.Google Scholar
Lockwood, DunbarUkraine Accedes (Finally) to NPT; Opens Way to START Reductions,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 10 (December 1994), p. 17.Google Scholar
Lofland, John, Polite Protesters: The American Peace Movement of the 1980s (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, David H., Moral Vision in International Politics, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward, “An Emerging Post-Nuclear Era?” Washington Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 1 (Winter 1988), pp. 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEachin, Douglas J., The Final Months of the War With Japan: Signals Intelligence, U. S. Invasion Planning, and the A-Bomb Decision (Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence, 1998).Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald, and Spinardi, Graham, “Tacit Knowledge, Weapons Design, and the Uninvention of Nuclear Weapons,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 101, no. 1 (July 1995), pp. 44–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMillan, Stuart, Neither Confirm Nor Deny: The Nuclear Ships Dispute Between New Zealand and the United States (New York: Praeger, 1987).Google Scholar
Maddox, Robert, Weapons for Victory: The Hiroshima Decision 50 Years Later (Columbia, MI: University of Missouri, 1995).Google Scholar
Madsen, Mark H. “The Image and Impact of World Opinion: Foreign Policy Making and Opinion Abroad,” Ph.D. diss., Harvard Dept. of Government, 1986.
Mandelbaum, Michael, The Nuclear Revolution: International Politics Before and After Hiroshima (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 240–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangano, Joseph J., Sternglass, Ernest J., Gould, Jay M., Sherman, Janette D., Brown, Jerry, and McDonnell, William, “Strontium-90 in Newborns and Childhood Disease,” Archives of Environmental Health, vol. 55, no. 4 (July/August 2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P., “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4 (Autumn 1998), pp. 949–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Susan B., “Realism and Weapons of Mass Destruction: A Consequentialist Analysis,” in Hashmi, Sohail H. and Lee, Steven P., eds., Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Susan B.The Role of Biological Weapons in International Politics: The Real Military Revolution,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 25, no. 1 (March 2002), pp. 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mass and Elite Views on Nuclear Security: U. S. National Security Surveys, 1993– 1999, University of New Mexico Institute of Public Policy, at http://bush.tamu.edu/content/faculty/nsp/99_vol2.html.
Matlock, Jack R., Autopsy on an Empire: The American Ambassador's Account of the Collapse of the Soviet Union (New York: Random House, 1995).Google Scholar
Mavrodes, George I., “Conventions and the Morality of War,” in Beitz, Charles, Cohen, Marshall, Scanlon, Thomas, and Simmons, A. John, eds., International Ethics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985), pp. 75–89.Google Scholar
May, Ernest R., and Zelikow, Philip D., The Kennedy Tapes: Inside the White House During the Cuban Missile Crisis (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1997).Google Scholar
McCrea, Frances B., and Markle, Gerald E., Minutes to Midnight: Nuclear Weapons Protest in America (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989).Google Scholar
McElroy, Robert W., Morality and American Foreign Policy: The Role of Ethics in International Affairs (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
McGwire, Michael, Military Objectives in Soviet Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings, 1987).Google Scholar
McNamara, Robert, “The Military Role of Nuclear Weapons: Perceptions and Misperceptions,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 62, no. 1 (Fall 1983), pp. 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Robert, Kaysen, Carl, and Rathjens, George, “Nuclear Weapons After the Cold War,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 70, no. 4 (Fall 1991), pp. 95–111.Google Scholar
McNamara, Robert S., Blight, James G., and Brigham, Robert K., Argument Without End (New York: Public Affairs, 1999).Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret, “Tabu,” Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. VII (Macmillan, 1937).Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security, vol. 19, no. 3 (Winter 1994/95), pp. 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meilinger, Philip S., Hoyt S. Vandenberg: The Life of a General (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan, Reputation and International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Miles, Rufus E. Jr., “Hiroshima: The Strange Myth of Half a Million American Lives Saved,” International Security, vol. 10 (Fall 1985), pp. 121–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, Tom, “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Workshop Report, Pugwash Meeting No. 279, November 2002, at www.pugwash.org/reports/nw/milne.htm.
Mlyn, Eric, The State, Society and Limited Nuclear War (Albany, NY: State University Press of New York, 1995).Google Scholar
Morgan, Patrick M., Deterrence: A Conceptual Analysis, vol. 40, Sage Library of Social Research (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1977).Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans, “Is World Opinion a Myth?,” New York Times Magazine, March 25, 1962.Google Scholar
Morris, Roger, Uncertain Greatness: Henry Kissinger and American Foreign Policy (New York: Harper & Row, 1977).Google Scholar
Morrison, Philip, and Tsipis, Kosta, “Rightful Names,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 59, no. 3 (May/June 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, James D., “The Laws of War, Common Conjectures and Legal Systems in International Politics,” Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 31, pt. 2 (January 2002), pp. S41–S60.Google Scholar
“The Most Terrible Bomb of All,” U. S. News and World Report, May 30, 1960.
Most, Benjamin A., and Starr, Harvey, “International Relations Theory, Foreign Policy Substitutability, and Nice Laws,” World Politics, vol. 36, no. 3 (April 1984), pp. 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moxley, Charles Jr., Nuclear Weapons and International Law in the Post-Cold War World (Lanham, MD: Austin & Winfield, 2000).Google Scholar
Mueller, John, War, Presidents and Public Opinion (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1973).Google Scholar
Mueller, JohnRetreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War (New York: Basic Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Mueller, John “American Public Opinion and the Gulf War,” in Renshon, Stanley A., ed., The Political Psychology of the Gulf War: Leaders, Publics, and the Conflict Process (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1993), pp. 199–226.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald, “Maintaining Non-Nuclear Weapons Status,” in Cowan Karp, Regina, ed., Security With Nuclear Weapons? Different Perspectives on National Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 301–39.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald “The Internalization of Principles, Norms and Rules by Governments: The Case of Security Regimes,” in Rittberger, Volker, ed., Regime Theory and International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993), pp. 361–88.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald, Kotter, Wolfgang, and Fischer, David, Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Global Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Munves, James, “Nuclear Arms, the Law and You,” Nuclear Times, April 1983.Google Scholar
Murray, Thomas, Nuclear Policy for War and Peace (Cleveland, OH: World Publishing Co., 1960).Google Scholar
Myrdal, Alva, The Game of Disarmament: How the United States and Russia Run the Arms Race (New York: Pantheon, 1976).Google Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan, “Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society,” International Organization, vol. 44, no. 4 (Autumn 1990), pp. 479–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanda, Ved, and Krieger, David, Nuclear Weapons and the World Court (Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers, 1998).Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert W., “Nuclear ‘Bunker Busters’ Would More Likely Disperse Than Destroy Buried Stockpiles of Biological and Chemical Agents,” Science and Global Security, vol. 12, nos. 1–2 (January/August 2004), pp. 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Agenda Coalition, “Nonproliferation and Disarmament Go Hand in Hand,” International Herald Tribune, September 22, 2004.
Newhouse, John, War and Peace in the Nuclear Age (New York: Knopf, 1989).Google Scholar
Newman, Robert P., Truman and the Hiroshima Cult (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard M., “Needed in Vietnam: The Will to Win,” Reader's Digest, August 1964, pp. 37–43.Google Scholar
Norris, Robert S., Racing for the Bomb: General Leslie Groves, The Manhattan Project's Indispensable Man (South Royalton, VT: Steerforth Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Norris, Robert, and Arkin, William M., “U. S. Nuclear Stockpile, July 1997,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 53, no. 4 (July/August 1997), pp. 62–63.Google Scholar
Norris, Robert, Arkin, William, and Burr, William, “Where They Were,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 55, no. 6 (November/December 1999), pp. 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Robert, and Kristensen, Hans M., “Global Nuclear Stockpiles, 1945–2002,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 58, no. 6 (November/December 2002), pp. 103–04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Nuclear Notebook,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (January/February, 1991).
Nye, Joseph P., “Nuclear Learning: US–Soviet Security Regimes,” International Organization, vol. 41, no. 3 (Summer 1987), pp. 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph P. “U. S.–Soviet Cooperation in a Non-Proliferation Regime,” in Alexander, L. George, Farley, Philip, and Dallin, Alexander, eds., U. S.–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 335–52.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S., and Smith, Roger K., eds., After the Storm: Lessons from the Gulf War, The Aspen Institute (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1992).Google Scholar
O'Loughlin, John, Meyer, Tom, Greenberg, Edward, eds., War and Its Consequences: Lessons from the Persian Gulf Conflict (New York: HarperCollins, 1994).Google Scholar
O'Neill, Dan, The Firecracker Boys (New York: St. Martin's Griffin, 1995).Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas, World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Osgood, Robert, Limited War: The Challenge to American Strategy (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Osgood, RobertNATO: The Entangling Alliance (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Panofsky, Wolfgang K. H., and Bunn, George, “The Doctrine of the Nuclear-Weapon States and the Future of Non-Proliferation,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 7 (July/August 1994), pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert A., Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Pape, Robert A., and Kaufmann, Chaim, “Explaining Costly International Moral Action: Britain's Sixty-Year Campaign Against the Atlantic Slave Trade,” International Organization, vol. 53, no. 4 (Autumn 1999), pp. 631–68.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V., “Nuclear Taboo and War Initiation in Regional Conflicts,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 39, no. 4 (December 1995), pp. 696–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkovich, George, “Nuclear Proliferation: Think Again,” Foreign Policy, vol. 112 (Fall 1998), pp. 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkovich, GeorgeIndia's Nuclear Bomb (Berkeley: University of California, 2001).Google Scholar
Perry, William J., “Desert Storm and Deterrence,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 70, no. 4 (Fall 1991), pp. 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, John, “Nuclear Threats During the Gulf War,” February 19, 1998 at www.fas.org/irp/eprint/ds-threats.htm.
Porpora, Douglas V., “Cultural Rules and Material Relations,” Sociological Theory, vol. 11, no. 2 (July 1993), pp. 212–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portela, Clara, “The EU and the NPT: Testing the New European Nonproliferation Strategy,” Disarmament Diplomacy, no. 78 (July/August 2004).Google Scholar
Potter, William C., “The Politics of Nuclear Renunciation: The Cases of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine,” Occasional Paper No. 22 (Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center, April 1995).
Prados, John, and Stubbe, Ray W., Valley of Decision: The Seige of Khe Sanh (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1991).Google Scholar
Price, Richard, The Chemical Weapons Taboo (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Price, RichardReversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Landmines,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 3 (Summer 1998), pp. 613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard and Nina Tannenwald, “Norms and Deterrence: The Nuclear and Chemical Weapons Taboos,” in Katzenstein, Peter, ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), pp. 114–52.Google Scholar
The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare, vol. I, SIPRI (New York: Humanities Press, 1971).
“Public Attitudes on Nuclear Weapons: An Opportunity for Leadership” (The Henry L. Stimson Center, Washington, DC, 1998).
Quester, George H., Deterrence Before Hiroshima: The Airpower Background of Modern Strategy (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1966).Google Scholar
Quester, George H. “Conceptions of Nuclear Threshold Status,” in Cowan Karp, Regina, ed., Security With Nuclear Weapons? Different Perspectives on National Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 209–28.Google Scholar
Quester, George H., Nuclear Monopoly (New Brunswick, NY: Transaction Publishers, 2000).Google Scholar
Quester, George H., and Utgoff, Victor A., “Toward an International Nuclear Security Policy,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 4 (1994), pp. 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe, Stephen G.Eisenhower Revisionism: a Decade of Scholarship: Review Article,” Diplomatic History, vol. 17 (Winter 1993), pp. 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R., Taboo (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1939).Google Scholar
Ray, James Lee, “The Abolition of Slavery and the End of International War,” International Organization, vol. 43, no. 3 (Summer 1989), pp. 405–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, Thornton, A Proposal to Neutralize Nuclear Weapons, Center of International Studies, Policy Memo no. 22 (Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson School, 1961).Google Scholar
Read, Thornton, “Limited Strategic War and Tactical Nuclear War,” in Knorr, Klaus and Read, Thornton, eds., Limited Strategic War (New York: Praeger, 1962), pp. 67–116.Google Scholar
Rearden, Steven L., History of the Office of Secretary of Defense, vol. I, The Formative Years 1947–50 (Washington, DC, 1984).Google Scholar
Record, Jeffrey, Hollow Victory: A Contrary View of the Gulf War (New York: Brassey's (US), 1993).Google Scholar
Redick, John R., “Latin America's Emerging Non-Proliferation Consensus,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 2 (March 1994), pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Reiss, Mitchell, Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain their Nuclear Capabilities (Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Renshon, Stanley A., ed., The Political Psychology of the Gulf War: Leaders, Publics, and the Conflict Process (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Rice, Condoleezza, “SALT and the Search for a Security Regime,” in Alexander, L. George, Farley, Philip J., and Dallin, Alexander, eds., U. S.–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Ridgway, Matthew, The Korean War (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1967).Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, “International Norms and Domestic Change: Arguing and Communicative Behavior in the Human Rights Area,” Politics and Society, vol. 27, no. 4 (December 1999), pp. 529–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds., The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, The Zero Option: INF, West Germany and Arms Control (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1988).Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, ThomasCooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U. S. Foreign Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Robertson, David, Sly and Able: A Political Biography of James F. Byrnes (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1994).Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul, “Pursuing a New Nuclear Weapons Policy for the 21st Century,” March 22, 2001, at www.sandia.gov/media/whitepaper/2001-04-Robinson.htm.
Rochon, Thomas R., Mobilizing for Peace: The Antinuclear Movements in Western Europe (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochon, Thomas R., and Meyer, David, eds., Coalitions and Political Movements: The Lessons of the Nuclear Freeze (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1997).Google Scholar
Roman, Peter, “Curtis LeMay and the Origins of NATO Atomic Targeting,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 16, no. 1 (March 1993), pp. 46–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Clive, Campaigns Against Western Defense: NATO's Adversaries and Critics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Mark E., “Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones,” Naval War College Review, vol. 49, no. 4 (Autumn 1996), pp. 44–66.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James, and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, eds., Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, David Alan, “The Origins of Overkill: Nuclear Weapons and American Strategy, 1945–1960,” International Security, vol. 7, no. 4 (Spring 1983), pp. 3–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosendorf, Neal, “John Foster Dulles' Nuclear Schizophrenia,” in Gaddis, John Lewis, Gordon, Philip H., May, Ernest R., and Rosenberg, Jonathan, eds., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb: Nuclear Diplomacy since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 62–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Larry A., “No First Use: A Codification of Deterrence,” unpublished manuscript (Madison, WI: December, 1982).
Rostow, Walt W., The Diffusion of Power (New York: Macmillan, 1972).Google Scholar
Rotblat, Joseph, Scientists in the Quest for Peace: A History of the Pugwash Conferences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Rotblat, JosephLeaving the Bomb Project,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 41, no. 7 (August 1985), pp. 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Steve, “The Publication of ‘Hiroshima’ in The New Yorker,” unpublished paper (Harvard University, 1997).
Rubin, Alfred, “The Neutron Bomb Again,” Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 21, no. 4 (1981), pp. 805–11.Google Scholar
Rubin, Alfred “Nuclear Weapons and International Law,” unpublished manuscript (Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, June 1983).
Rusciano, Frank Louis, et al., World Opinion and the Emerging International Order (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998).Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, “Ethical Dilemmas of Nuclear Deterrance,” International Security, vol. 8, no. 4 (Spring 1984), pp. 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce “The Real Decline of Nuclear Hegemony,” in Rosenau, James and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, eds., Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1989), pp. 177–93.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce “An Acceptable Role for Nuclear Weapons?” in Kegley, Charles and Schwab, Kenneth L., eds., After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991), pp. 121–45.Google Scholar
Russett, BruceGrasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World (Princeton, NJ: University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Rutherford, Kenneth, Brem, Stefen, and Matthew, Richard A., eds., Reframing the Agenda: The Impact of NGO and Middle Power Cooperation in International Security (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003).Google Scholar
Safire, William, “On Language: Weapons of Mass Destruction,” New York Times Magazine, April 19, 1998, p. 22.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott, The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Sagan, ScottPerils of Proliferation,” International Security, vol. 18, no. 4 (Spring 1994), pp. 77–81.Google Scholar
Sagan, ScottWhy Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb,” International Security, vol. 21, no. 3 (Winter 1996/97), pp. 54–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagan, Scott “Realist Perspectives on Ethical Norms and Weapons of Mass Destruction,” in Hashmi, Sohail H. and Lee, Steven P., eds., Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Religious and Secular Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ralph, “Nuclear Dynamite: A New Dimension in Foreign Policy,” Orbis, vol. 4, no. 1 (1960), pp. 307–22.Google Scholar
Saunders, Philip and Jing-Dong Yuan, “China's Strategic Force Modernization: Issues and Implications for the United States,” Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies, 2000, at cns.miis.edu/cns/projects/eanp/conf/op4_sjd.pdf.
Sayle, Murray, “Letter from Hiroshima: Did the Bomb End the War?” New Yorker, July 31, 1995, pp. 40–64.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey, “Normative Explanations,” in Braybrooke, David, ed., Social Rules: Origin, Character, Logic, Change (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996), pp. 35–51.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Ronald, Wings of Judgement: American Bombing in World War II (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Schapiro, Mark, “Mutiny on the Nuclear Bounty: Nonaligned versus the Bomb,” The Nation, vol. 227, no. 22 (December 27, 1993), pp. 798–800.Google Scholar
Scheer, Robert, With Enough Shovels: Reagan, Bush and Nuclear War (New York: Random House, 1982).Google Scholar
Scheinman, Lawrence, “The Non-Proliferation Treaty: On the Road to 1995,” IAEA Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 1 (1992).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas, Nuclear Weapons and Limited War (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1959).Google Scholar
Schelling, ThomasThe Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1960, reprint 1980).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas “The Role of Nuclear Weapons,” in Ederington, L. Benjamin and Mazarr, Michael J., eds., Turning Point: The Gulf War and U. S. Military Stratetgy (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994), pp. 105–15.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas “Forward”, in Larsen, Jeffrey A., ed., Arms Control and a Changing Environment (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas “The Legacy of Hiroshima: A Half-Century without Nuclear War,” Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, at www.puaf.umd.edu/IPPP/Summer00/legacy_of_hiroshima.htm.
Schimmelfennig, Frank, “Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union,” International Organization, vol. 55, no. 1 (2001), pp. 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlaim, Avi, The United States and the Berlin Blockade, 1948–49 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., “The International Court of Justice and the Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Naval War College Review, vol. 51, no. 2 (Spring 1998), pp. 91–116.Google Scholar
Schnabel, James F. and Watson, Robert J., The History of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, vol. III, Korean War, part 1 (Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1979).Google Scholar
Schnell, Jonathan, The Gift of Time: The Case for Abolishing Nuclear Weapons Now (New York: Henry Holt, 1998).Google Scholar
Schwartz, David N., “A Historical Perspective,” in Steinbruner, John D. and Sigal, Leon V., eds., Alliance Security: NATO and the No-First-Use Question (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1983), pp. 5–21.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Stephen I., ed., Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of U. S. Nuclear Weapons Since 1940 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Seaborg, Glenn T., with Loeb, Benjamin, Stemming the Tide: Arms Control in the Johnson Years (Lexington, KY: Lexington Books, 1987).Google Scholar
Searle, John R., The Construction of Social Reality (New York: The Free Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Serrano, Monica, “Latin America – The Treaty of Tlatelolco,” in Thakur, Ramesh, ed., Nuclear Weapons-Free Zones (New York: St. Martin's, 1998), pp. 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Adam, “Nuclear Weapons Free Zones: The Solution to Nuclear Disarmament?”, UN Chronicle, vol. 41, no. 3 (2004).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Mark, “Mutiny on the Nuclear Bounty: Nonaligned versus the Bomb,” The Nation, December 27, 1993.Google Scholar
Shen, Dingli, “Toward a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World: A Chinese Perspective,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 2 (March/April 1994), pp. 51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, Martin, A World Destroyed: The Atomic Bomb and the Grand Alliance (New York: Knopf, 1975).Google Scholar
Sigal, Leon V., Fighting to a Finish: The Politics of War Termination in the United States and Japan, 1945 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Simpson, John, and Howlett, Darryl, “The NPT Renewal Conference: Stumbling Toward 1995,” International Security, vol. 19, no. 1 (Summer 1994), pp. 41–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Jasjit, “Indian Draft Nuclear Doctrine: Some Reflections,” September 1999, at www.pugwash.org/reports/nw/nw7.htm.
SIPRI, “The Non-Use of CB Weapons during World War II,” in The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare, vols. I and II (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1971).
SIPRI “The Right to Conduct Nuclear Explosions: Political Aspects and Policy Proposals,” Stockholm Paper No. 6 (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 1975).
SIPRIYearbook 1990: World Armaments and Disarmament (Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 1990).
Smith, Alice Kimball, A Peril and a Hope: The Scientists' Movement in America, 1945–47 (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Smith, Jackie, Chatfield, Charles, and Pugnucco, Ron, eds., Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Snow, C. P., “The Moral Un-Neutrality of Science,” Science, vol. 133, no. 3448 (January 27, 1961), p. 259.
Snowden, Lynn, “How Likely are Terrorists to Use a Nuclear Strategy?” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 46, no. 6 (February 2003), pp. 699–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H., Deterrence and Defense (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, Richard, The Impact of Public Opinion on U. S. Foreign Policy Since Vietnam (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Sokov, Nikolai, “Russia's New National Security Concept: The Nuclear Angle” (January 2000, revised July 2004), at www.nti.org/db/nisprofs/over/concept.htm.
Sokov, NikolaiWhy Do States Rely on Nuclear Weapons? The Case of Russia and Beyond,” The Nonproliferation Review, vol. 9, no. 2 (Summer 2002), pp. 101–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokov, Nikolai “Russia's Nuclear Doctrine,” Research Report, Center for Nonproliferation Studies, August 2004, at www.nti.org/_research/3_55a.html.
Soman, Appu K., Double-Edged Sword: Nuclear Diplomacy in Unequal Conflicts: The United States and China, 1950–58 (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000).Google Scholar
Spanier, John W., and Nogee, Joseph L., The Politics of Disarmament: A Study of Soviet–American Gamesmanship (New York: Praeger, 1962).Google Scholar
Spector, Leonard, The Undeclared Bomb (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1988).Google Scholar
Stein, Peter, and Feaver, Peter, Assuring Control of Nuclear Weapons: The Evolution of Permissive Action Links (Cambridge, MA: Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, 1987).Google Scholar
Steinberger, Jack, Udgaonkar, Bhalchandra, and Rotblat, Joseph, eds., A Nuclear-Weapon-Free World (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Steinbruner, John, “Renovating Arms Control Through Reassurance,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 2 (Spring 2000), pp. 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbruner, John D., and Sigal, Leon V., eds., Alliance Security: NATO and the No-First-Use Question (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1983).Google Scholar
Steiner, Franz, Taboo (London: Cohen and West, 1956).Google Scholar
Stern, Jessica, “Terrorist Motivations and Unconventional Weapons,” in Lavoy, Peter R., Sagan, Scott D., and Wirtz, James J., Planning the Unthinkable: How New Nuclear Powers Will Use Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Weapons (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000), pp. 202–29.Google Scholar
Stern, Paul, Axelrod, Robert, Jervis, Robert, and Radnor, Roy, eds., Perspectives on Deterrence (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Stern, Sheldon, Averting the ‘Final Failure:’ John F. Kennedy and the Secret Cuban Missile Crisis Meetings (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Stevens, David, “Dangerous Precedents: Emulation and Norm Violation in Foreign Policy Decision-Making,” unpublished paper, Columbia University, April 30, 2004.
Stigler, George and Becker, Gary, “De Gustibus Non est Disputandum,” American Economic Review, vol. 67 (1977), pp. 76–90.Google Scholar
Stimson, Henry, “The Decision to Use the Bomb,” Harper's, vol. 194, no. 1161 (February 1947), pp. 97–107.Google Scholar
Stromseth, Jane, The Origins of Flexible Response: NATO's Debate Over Strategy in the 1960s (New York: St. Martin's, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, Robert A., Working in the World: Jimmy Carter and the Making of American Foreign Policy (Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University, 2000).Google Scholar
Stueck, William, The Korean War: An International History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert, “The Role of Inductive Reasoning in the Evolution of Conventions,” Law and Philosophy, vol. 17, no. 4 (1998), pp. 377–410.Google Scholar
Szulc, Tad, The Illusion of Peace: Foreign Policy in the Nixon Years (New York: Viking Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Takaki, Ronald, Why America Dropped the Bomb (New York: Little, Brown & Co., 1995).Google Scholar
Talbott, Strobe, Master of the Game: Paul Nitze and the Nuclear Peace (New York: Knopf, 1988).Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina, “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use,” International Organization, vol. 53, no. 3 (Summer 1999), pp. 433–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenwald, NinaKeeping Weapons from Terrorists: The Urgent Need for Arms Control,” Brown Journal of World Affairs, vol. 8, no. 2 (Winter 2001), pp. 27–36.Google Scholar
“Targeting Ho Chi Minh Trail,” at www.nautilus.org/VietnamFOIA/background/HoChiMinhTrail.html.
Taylor, Richard, Against the Bomb: The British Peace Movement, 1958–1965 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Taylor, Richard, and Pritchard, Charles, The Protest-Makers (London: Pergamon, 1982).Google Scholar
Terriff, Terry, The Nixon Administration and the Making of U. S. Nuclear Strategy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh, “Stepping Stones to a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World,” in Thakur, Ramesh, ed., Nuclear Weapons-Free Zones (New York: St. Martin's, 1998), pp. 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Ward, Ethics of Destruction: Norms and Force in International Relations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Thomas, William I., and Swaine Thomas, Dorothy, The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs (New York: A. A. Knopf, 1928).Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc, “A ‘Wasting Asset’: American Strategy and the Shifting Nuclear Balance, 1949–1954,” International Security, vol. 13, no. 3 (Winter 1988/89), pp. 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc “The Berlin Crisis,” in Trachtenberg, , History and Strategy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991), pp. 169–234.Google Scholar
Tucker, Jonathan B., Brad Roberts, and Elisa Harris, “Chemical and Biological Weapons,” in Cirincione, Joseph, ed., Repairing the Regime: Preventing the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction (New York: Routledge, 2000), pp. 217–32.Google Scholar
Tucker, Jonathan B., Brad Roberts, and Elisa Harris “The Nuclear Future: Political and Social Considerations,” CNSS Papers, No. 11 (Center for National Security Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, June 1988).
Tucker, Robert, and Hendrickson, David, The Imperial Temptation: The New World Order and America's Purpose (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1992).Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert C., Knorr, Klaus, Richard, A. Falk, and Bull, Hedley, Proposal for No First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Pros and Cons, Center of International Studies, Policy Memo No. 28 (Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson School, 1963).Google Scholar
Turner, Stansfield, Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Weapons (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Ullman, Richard H., “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 50, no. 4 (July 1972), pp. 669–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman-Margalit, Edna, The Emergence of Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Union of Concerned Scientists, No First Use (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1983).
United Nations, The United Nations and Disarmament, 1945–1970 (New York: United Nations, 1970).
United NationsThe United Nations and Nuclear Non-Proliferation (New York: United Nations, 1995).
US News and World Report, Triumph Without Victory: The Unreported History of the Persian Gulf War (NY: Times Books/Random House, 1992).
Courtland Moon, John Ellis, “Chemical Weapons and Deterrence: The WWII Experience,” International Security, vol. 8, no. 4 (Spring 1984), pp. 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crevald, Martin, Technology and War: From 2000 B. C. to the Present (New York: Free Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Crevald, MartinNuclear Proliferation and the Future of Conflict (New York: Free Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Voorst, Bruce J., “The Churches and Nuclear Deterrence,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 61, no. 4 (Spring 1983), pp. 827–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitzthum, Wolfgang Graf, “The World Nuclear Order and the Equality of States,” Law and State, vol. 25 (1982), pp. 23–50.Google Scholar
Wright, G. H., Explanation and Understanding (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Walker, J. Samuel, “The Decision to Use the Bomb: A Historiographical Update,” Diplomatic History, vol. 14, no. 1 (Winter 1990), pp. 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J. SamuelPrompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Walker, William, “Nuclear Order and Disorder,” International Affairs, vol. 76, no. 4 (2000), pp. 703–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, Douglas C., Congress and the Nuclear Freeze: An Inside Look at the Politics of a Mass Movement (Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, 1987).Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979).Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N.The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Be Better, Adelphi Paper No. 171 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1981).Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N.Kenneth, N. Waltz and Scott, D. Sagan, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed, (New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 2003).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (New York: Basic Books, 1992), 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael “Justice and Injustice in the Gulf War,” in Decosse, David E., ed., But Was It Just? Reflections on the Morality of the Persian Gulf War (New York: Doubleday, 1992), pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, and Fussell, Paul, “An Exchange on Hiroshima,” The New Republic, September 23, 1981, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
Ware, Alyn, “The World Court and Nuclear Weapons: Who Is Listening?” UN Chronicle, vol. 36, no. 4 (1999).Google Scholar
Ware, Alyn “NGO and Government Cooperation in Setting the Disarmament Agenda: The Impact of the 1996 International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion,” in Rutherford, Kenneth, Brem, Stefen, and Matthew, Richard A., eds., Reframing the Agenda: The Impact of NGO and Middle Power Cooperation in International Security (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003), pp. 113–42.Google Scholar
Warnke, Paul, “Now More than Ever: No First Use,” in Kegley, Charles W. and Schwab, Kenneth L., eds., After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991), pp. 55–65.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Sherri L., The Neutron Bomb Controversy: A Study in Alliance Politics (New York: Praeger, 1983).Google Scholar
Weathersby, Kathryn, ed. and trans., “New Russian Documents on the Korean War,” Cold War International History Project Bulletin, no. 6–7 (Winter 1995/96).Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E., The Social Psychology of Organizing (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969).Google Scholar
Weiler, Lawrence, “The Evolution of the Concept of No First Use,” unpublished manuscript, NYC Conference: Council for a Livable World, October 24, 1982.
Weinberg, Alvin, “The Sanctification of Hiroshima,” Oak Ridge Associated Universities, November 1995.
Weinberg, Alvin “The Bell and the Bomb,” Cosmos Journal (1997), at www.cosmos-club.org/journals/1997/index.html.
Weingast, Barry, “A Rational Choice Perspective on the Role of Ideas: Shared Belief Systems and State Sovereignty in International Cooperation,” Politics and Society, vol. 12 (December 1995), pp. 449–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, David, Justice and the Genesis of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Andreas, Living With Peril: Eisenhower, Kennedy and Nuclear Weapons (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997).Google Scholar
Westing, Arthur, ed., Cultural Norms, War and the Environment, SIPRI (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Wheeler, John Archibald, with Ford, Kenneth, Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam: A Life in Physics (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1998).Google Scholar
White, Theodore H., The Making of the President 1964 (New York: Athenaeum Publishers, 1965).Google Scholar
Whiting, Alan, China Cross the Yalu (New York: Macmillan, 1960).Google Scholar
Williamson, Samuel R., and Reardon, Steven L., The Origins of U. S. Nuclear Strategy, 1945–1953 (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willrich, Mason, “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons: An Assessment,” Orbis, vol. 9, no. 2 (Summer 1965), pp. 299–315.Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence S., Rebels Against War: The American Peace Movement 1933–1983 (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1984), rev. edn.Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence S.One World or None: A History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement Through 1953, vol. I of The Struggle Against the Bomb (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993).
Wittner, Lawrence S.Resisting the Bomb: A History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement, 1954–1970, vol. II of The Struggle Against the Bomb (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence S.Toward Nuclear Abolition: A History of the World Disarmament Movement, 1971 to the Present, vol. III of The Struggle Against the Bomb (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Wright, David, “The Spratt-Furse Law on Mini-Nuke Development,” Backgrounder, Union of Concerned Scientists, May 11, 2003.
Yaffe, Michael, “Nuclear Weapons and U. S. Army Organization,” manuscript (September 1990).
Yee, Albert, “Thick Rationality and the Missing ‘Brute Fact’: The Limits of Rationalist Incorporation of Norms and Ideas,” Journal of Politics, vol. 59, no. 4 (November 1997), pp. 1001–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yost, David S., “The Delegitimization of Nuclear Deterrence?” Armed Forces and Society, vol. 16, no. 4 (Summer 1990), pp. 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Jing-Dong, “Chinese Responses to U. S. Missile Defenses: Implications for Arms Control and Regional Security,” Nonproliferation Review, vol. 10 (Spring 2003), pp. 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaborsky, Victor, “Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation: The Evolution of the Ukrainian Case,” CSIA Discussion Paper 94–05, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, June 1994.
Zhara, Farah, “Pakistan's Road to a Minimum Nuclear Deterrent,” Arms Control Today, vol. 29, no. 5 (July/August 1999), pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
Zook, Darren C., “A Culture of Deterrence: Nuclear Myths and Cultural Chauvinism in South Asia,” World Policy Journal, vol. 17, no. 1 (Spring 2000), pp. 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubok, Vladislav M., and Hope M. Harrison, “The Nuclear Education of Nikita Khrushschev,” in Lewis Gaddis, Johnet al., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb: Nuclear Diplomacy Since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 141–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annual Report to the President and the Congress (Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense, January 1994).
Ball, George, “How Valid Are the Assumptions Underlying our Vietnam Policies?” memo, October 5, 1964, reprinted in The Atlantic Monthly, 1972, pp. 41–42.
Barrett, David M., ed., Lyndon B. Johnson's Vietnam Papers (College Station: Texas A & M University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Keany, Thomas A., and Elliot, A. Cohen, Gulf War Air Power Survey (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Pentagon Papers: The Defense Department History of United States Decisionmaking on Vietnam, vol. III (Boston: Beacon Press, 1971), Senator Gravel edition.
Public Papers of the President: Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1955 (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1956).
Public Papers of the President: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1963–64, vol. I (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1965).
Public Papers of the Presidents: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1968–69, vol. I (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1970).
Public Papers of the Presidents: Harry S. Truman, 1950 (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1965).
Public Papers of the Presidents: Harry S. Truman, 1953 (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1965).
US Department of Defense, Conduct of the Persian Gulf War: Final Report, 3 vols. (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1992).
US Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945, Conference at Quebec, September 18, 1944 (Washington, DC: 1972).
US Department of State1945, vol. 2, General: Political and Economic Matters (Washington, DC: GPO, 1967).
US Department of State1948, vol. 1, General (Washington, DC: GPO, 1975).
US Department of State1950, vol. 1, National Security Affairs; Foreign and Economic Policy (Washington DC: GPO, 1977).
US Department of State1950, vol. 7, Korea (Washington, DC: GPO, 1976).
US Department of State1951, vol. 7, Korea and China (Washington, DC: GPO, 1983)
US Department of State1952–54, vol. 1, General and Political Matters (Washington, DC: GPO, 1984).
US Department of State1952–54, vol. 2, National Security Affairs, parts 1 and 2 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1984).
US Department of State1952–54, vol. 14, China and Japan, parts 1 and 2 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1985).
US Department of State1952–54, vol. 15, Korea, parts 1 and 2 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1984).
US Department of State1955–57, vol. 19, National Security Policy (Washington, DC: GPO, 1990).
US Department of State1955–57, vol. 20, Regulation of Armaments and Atomic Energy (Washington, DC: GPO, 1990).
US Department of State1961–63, vol. 7, Arms Control and Disarmament (Washington, DC: GPO, 1995).
US Department of State1961–63, vol. 19, South Asia (Washington, DC: GPO, 1996).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 1, Vietnam, 1964 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1992).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 2, Vietnam, January–June 1965 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1996).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 3, Vietnam, June–December 1965 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1996).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 4, Vietnam 1966 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1998).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 5, Vietnam 1967 (Washington, DC: GPO, 2002).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 11, Arms Control and Disarmament (Washington, DC: GPO, 1997).
US Department of State, The Washington Summit: General Secretary Brezhnev's Visit to the United States, June 18–25, 1973, Publication 8733 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1973).
US Strategic Bombing Survey, The Effects of the Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Chairman's Office, 30 June 1946 (Washington, DC: US GPO).
Acheson, Dean, Present at the Creation: My Years at the State Department (New York: Norton, 1969).Google Scholar
Acheson, DeanThe Korean War (New York: Norton, 1971).Google Scholar
Anders, Roger, ed., Forging the Atomic Shield: Excerpts from the Office Diary of Gordon E. Dean (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Baker, James A. III, with DeFrank, Thomas M., The Politics of Diplomacy: Revolution, War and Peace, 1989–1992 (New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1995).Google Scholar
Ball, George, The Past Has Another Pattern: Memoirs (New York: Norton, 1982).Google Scholar
Blum, John Morton, ed., The Price of Vision: The Diary of Henry A. Wallace, 1942–1946 (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1973).Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Zbigniew, Power and Principle: Memoirs of the National Security Advisor, 1977–1981 (New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux, 1983).Google Scholar
Bush, George, and Scowcroft, Brent, A World Transformed (New York: Knopf, 1998).Google Scholar
Bush, Vannevar, Pieces of the Action (New York: William Morrow and Co., 1970).Google Scholar
Carter, Jimmy, Keeping Faith: Memoirs of a President (New York: Bantam, 1982).Google Scholar
Cohen, Samuel T., The Truth About the Neutron Bomb (New York: Morrow, 1983).Google Scholar
Collins, J. Lawton, War in Peacetime: The History and Lessons of Korea (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1969).Google Scholar
Compton, Arthur Holly, Atomic Quest (New York: Oxford University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Eisenhower, Dwight D., Mandate for Change, 1953–56: The White House Years (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1963).Google Scholar
Ellsberg, Daniel, Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers (New York: Viking, 2002).Google Scholar
Gavin, James M. Lt. Gen., War and Peace in the Space Age (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1958).Google Scholar
Groves, Leslie, Now It Can Be Told: The Story of the Manhattan Project (New York: Harper, 1962).Google Scholar
Haig, Alexander M. Jr., Inner Circles: How America Changed the World: A Memoir (New York: Warner Books, 1992).Google Scholar
Haldeman, H. R., with DiMona, Joseph, The Ends of Power (New York: Times Books, 1978).Google Scholar
Haldeman, H. R., with DiMona, JosephThe Haldeman Diaries: Inside the Nixon White House (G. Putnam's Sons, 1994).Google Scholar
Johnson, Lyndon, The Vantage Point: Perspectives of the Presidency, 1963–1969 (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1984, 1971).Google Scholar
Joy, C. Turner, How Communists Negotiate (Santa Monica, CA: Fidelis Publications, 1955, 1970).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A., Years of Upheaval (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1992).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A.The White House Years (Boston: Little, Brown, 1979).Google Scholar
Leahy, William D. Adm., I Was There (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950).Google Scholar
Lilienthal, David E., The Journals of David E. Lilienthal, vol. II (New York: Harper and Row, 1964).Google Scholar
McNamara, Robert, with Mark, Brian, In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam (New York: Times Books, 1995).Google Scholar
Nichols, K. D., The Road to Trinity (New York: William Morrow & Co., 1987).Google Scholar
Nitze, Paul H., with Smith, Ann M. and Rearden, Steven L., From Hiroshima to Glasnost: At the Center of a Decision: A Memoir (London: G. Weidenfeld, 1989).Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard M., No More Vietnams (New York: Arbor House, 1985).Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard M.RN: The Memoirs of Richard Nixon (New York: Grosset and Dunlap, 1978).Google Scholar
Powell, Colin, with Joseph, E. Persico, My American Journey (New York: Random House, 1995).Google Scholar
Rusk, Dean (as told to Richard Rusk), As I Saw It (New York: W. W. Norton, 1990).Google Scholar
Schwarzkopf, H. Norman, with Peter, Petre, It Doesn't Take a Hero (New York: Bantam, 1992).Google Scholar
Smith, Gerard, Disarming Diplomat: The Memoirs of Gerard Smith, Arms Control Negotiator (Lanham, MD: Madison Books, 1996).Google Scholar
Taylor, Maxwell, Swords and Plowshares (New York: Norton, 1972).Google Scholar
Truman, Harry S., Memoirs: Year of Decisions, vol. I (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1955).Google Scholar
Truman, Harry S.Off the Record: The Private Papers of Harry S. Truman, Robert H. Ferrell, ed. (New York: Harper and Row, 1980).Google Scholar
Twining, Nathan, Neither Liberty Nor Safety (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966).Google Scholar
Vance, Cyrus R., Hard Choices: Four Critical Years in America's Foreign Policy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983).Google Scholar
Westmoreland, William C., A Soldier Reports (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1976).Google Scholar
York, Herbert, Making Weapons, Talking Peace (New York: Basic Books, 1987).Google Scholar
Aachen, Christopher, and Snidal, Duncan, “Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies,” World Politics, vol. 41, no. 2 (January 1989), pp. 143–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Gary, and Jeffrey M. Bale, “Al Qa'ida and Weapons of Mass Destruction,” at cns.miis.edu/pubs/other/alqwmd.htm.
Ackland, Len, “Gulf Macho,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 47, no. 1 (January/February 1991), p. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, Kenneth L., The Great Universal Embrace: Arms Summitry – A Skeptic's Account (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989).Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism and World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations, vol. 3, no. 3 (September 1997), pp. 319–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel “Cognitive Evolution: A Dynamic Approach for the Study of International Relations and Their Progress,” in Adler, Emanuel and Crawford, Beverly, eds., Progress in Postwar International Relations (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Agnew, Harold, “A Plan to Lessen Suspicions,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 33, no. 3 (November/December 1997), p. 7.Google Scholar
Albright, David, “South Africa and the Affordable Bomb,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 50, no. 4 (July/August 1994), pp. 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albright, David, and O'Neill, Kevin, “Non-Proliferation: Jury-Rigged but Working,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 1 (January/February 1995), pp. 22–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Thomas, War Games (New York: McGraw Hill, 1987).Google Scholar
Allison, Graham, Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe (New York: Times Books, 2004).Google Scholar
Alperovitz, Gar, Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam: The Use of the Atomic Bomb and the American Confrontation with Soviet Power (London: Pluto, 1994), 2nd expanded edn.Google Scholar
Alperovitz, Gar, and Robert, L. Messer, Barton, Bernstein, “Marshall, Truman, and the Decision to Drop the Bomb,” correspondence in International Security, vol. 16, no. 3 (Winter 1991/92), pp. 204–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, Stephen, Nixon: The Triumph of a Politician: 1962–1972 (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989).Google Scholar
“An American Legacy: Building a Nuclear Weapon Free World,” Final Report, Project on Eliminating Weapons of Mass Destruction (Washington, DC: Henry L. Stimson Center, 1997).
Anders, Roger, ed., Forging the Atomic Shield: Excerpts from the Office Diary of Gordon E. Dean (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Aquino, Michael A., “ The Neutron Bomb,” Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1980.Google Scholar
Arbatov, Alexei, “Russian Military Doctrine and Nuclear Forces to the Year 2000 and Beyond,” paper presented at the Conference on Russian Defense Policy Towards the Year 2000, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, March 26–27, 1997.
Arbman, Gunnar, and Charles Thornton, “Russia's Tactical Nuclear Weapons: Part I, Background and Policy Issues,” Swedish Defense Research Agency, FOI-R-1057-SE (November 2003), at www.cissm.umd.edu/documents/thorntonrussia.pdf.
Arkin, William M., “Flying Solo,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 54, no. 6 (November/December 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkin, William M.Calculated Ambiguity: Nuclear Weapons and the Gulf War,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 4 (1996), pp. 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkin, William M.Inarticulating Nuclear Policy,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 1 (January/February 1995), p. 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkin, William M.U. S. Nukes in the Gulf,” The Nation, vol. 251, no. 23 (December 31, 1990), pp. 834–36.Google Scholar
Arkin, William, Handler, Joshua, and Durrant, Damian, U. S. Nuclear Weapons in the Persian Gulf Crisis (Washington, DC: Greenpeace, January 1991).Google Scholar
Art, Robert, “The United States, Nuclear Weapons and Grand Strategy,” in Karp, Regina Cowan, ed., Security With Nuclear Weapons? Different Perspectives on National Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 57–99.Google Scholar
Asada, Sadao, “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan's Decision to Surrender – a Reconsideration,” Pacific Historical Review, vol. 67, no. 4 (November 1998), pp. 477–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ascherio, Alberto, et al., “The Effects of the Gulf War on Infant and Child Mortality in Iraq,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 327, no. 13 (1992), pp. 931–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Rick, Crusade: The Untold Story of the Persian Gulf War (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1993).Google Scholar
Atwood, David C., “Mobilizing Around the United Nations Special Sessions on Disarmament,” in Smith, Jackie, Chatfield, Charles, and Pugnucco, Ron, eds., Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1997), 141–58.Google Scholar
Auger, Vincent A., The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Analysis: The Carter Administration and the Neutron Bomb (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996).Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, “The Evolutionary Creation of Norms,” American Political Science Review, vol. 80, no. 4 (December 1986), pp. 1095–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayewah, Isaac E., “The Treaty on the Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone in Africa (The Pelindaba Treaty),” in Alves, Pericles Gasparini and Cipollone, Daiana Belinda, eds., Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones in the 21st Century (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1997), 55–58.Google Scholar
Baaro, Makurita, “The South Pacific Nuclear-Free Zone Treaty,” in Alves, Pericles Gasparini and Cipollone, Daiana Belinda, eds., Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones in the 21st Century (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1997), 49–54.Google Scholar
Ball, George, “The Cosmic Bluff,” New York Review of Books, July 1983, pp. 37–38.Google Scholar
Barkun, Michael, Law Without Sanctions: Order in Primitive Societies and the World Community (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Barnaby, Frank, How Nuclear Weapons Spread: Nuclear Weapons Proliferation in the 1990s (London: Routledge, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, John, “The Nuclear Option: Thinking the Unthinkable,” Newsweek, January 14, 1991, p. 17.Google Scholar
Bennett, Gordon C., The New Abolitionists: The Story of Nuclear Free Zones (Elgin, IL: Brethen, 1987).Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Luckmann, Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality (New York: Anchor Books, 1967).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J., “A Postwar Myth: 500,000 U. S. Lives Saved,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 42, no. 4 (June/July 1986), pp. 38–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Ike and Hiroshima: Did He Oppose It?” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 10 (September 1987), pp. 377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Eclipsed by Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Early Thinking About Tactical Nuclear Weapons,” International Security, vol. 15, no. 4 (Spring 1991), pp. 149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.The Atomic Bombings Reconsidered,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 74, no. 1 (January 1995), pp. 135–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Compelling Japan's Surrender Without the A-bomb, Soviet Entry or Invasion: Reconsidering the U. S. Bombing Survey's Early Surrender Conclusions,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 18, no. 2 (1995), pp. 54–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Understanding the Atomic Bomb and the Japanese Surrender: Missed Opportunities, Little-Known Near Disasters, and Modern Memory,” Diplomatic History, vol. 19, no. 2 (Spring 1995), pp. 227–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J. “Doing Nuclear History: Treating Scholarship Fairly and Interpreting Pre-Hiroshima Thinking About ‘Radioactive Poisoning’,” Newsletter – Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, September 1996, pp. 17–43.
Bernstein, Barton J.Truman and the A-Bomb: Targeting Noncombatants, Using the Bomb, and His Defending the ‘Decision’,” Journal of Military History, vol. 62 (July 1998), pp. 547–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Reconsidering Truman's Claim of ‘Half A Million Lives Saved’ by the Atomic Bomb: The Construction and Deconstruction of a Myth,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 22, no. 1 (1999), pp. 101–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, Richard K., Nuclear Blackmail and Nuclear Balance (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1987).Google Scholar
Biddle, Steve D., and Feaver, Peter D., eds., Battlefield Nuclear Weapons: Issues and Options, Occasional Paper No. 5 (Cambridge, MA: Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, 1989).Google Scholar
Biersteker, Thomas J., and Weber, Cynthia, eds., State Sovereignty as Social Contract (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Bilmes, Jack, Discourse and Behavior (New York: Plenum Press, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Kai, The Color of Truth: McGeorge Bundy and William Bundy, Brothers in Arms (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1998).Google Scholar
Blackaby, Frank, Goldblat, Jozef, and Lodgaard, Sverre, eds., No First Use, SIPRI (London: Taylor and Francis, 1984).Google Scholar
Blacker, Coit, and Duffy, Gloria, International Arms Control: Issues and Agreements (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Blight, James G., ed., Missed Opportunities? Revisiting the Decisions of the Vietnam War, 1945–68, Hanoi Conference, June 20–23, 1997. Transcript, Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, 1998.Google Scholar
Blight, James G.The Shattered Crystal Ball: Fear and Learning in the Cuban Missile Crisis (Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1990).Google Scholar
Bowie, Robert R., and Immerman, Richard H., Waging Peace: How Eisenhower Shaped an Enduring Cold War Strategy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Boyer, Paul, By the Bomb's Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age (New York: Pantheon Books, 1985).Google Scholar
Boyer, PaulFallout: A Historian Reflects on America's Half-Century Encounter with Nuclear Weapons (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
“Briefing Book on Tactical Nuclear Weapons” (January 2003) at www.armscontrolcenter.org/prolifproject/tnw/index.html.
Brands, H. W. Jr., “Testing Massive Retaliation: Credibility and Crisis Management in the Taiwan Strait,” International Security, vol. 12, no. 4 (Spring 1988), pp. 121–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, Bernard, War and Politics (New York: Macmillan, 1973).Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard, ed., The Absolute Weapon:Atomic Power and World Order (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1946).Google Scholar
Broscious, David, “Longing for International Control, Banking on American Superiority: Harry S. Truman's Approach to Nuclear Weapons,” in Gaddis, John Lewiset al., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb: Nuclear Diplomacy Since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhite, Russell D., and Hamel, Christopher W., “War for Peace: The Question of an American Preventive War Against the Soviet Union, 1945–1955,” Diplomatic History, vol. 14, no. 3 (1990), pp. 367–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Builder, Carl H., and Graubard, Morlie H., The International Law of Armed Conflict: Implications for the Concept of Assured Destruction (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1982).Google Scholar
Bundy, McGeorge, Danger and Survival: Decisions About the Bomb in the First Fifty Years (New York: Random House, 1988).Google Scholar
Bundy, McGeorgeNuclear Weapons and the Gulf,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 70, no. 4 (Fall 1991), pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
Bundy, McGeorge, McNamara, Robert S., Smith, Gerard, and Kennan, George, “Nuclear Weapons and the Atlantic Alliance,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 60, no. 4 (Spring 1982), pp. 753–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundy, William, A Tangled Web: The Making of Foreign Policy in the Nixon Presidency (New York: Hill and Wang, 1998).Google Scholar
Bunn, George, Arms Control By Committee: Managing Negotiations with the Russians (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Bunn, George “Evolution of the Issue of No First Use of Nuclear Weapons,” unpublished manuscript (April 1982).
Bunn, GeorgeUS Law of Nuclear Weapons,” Naval War College Review, vol. 32, no. 4 (July/August 1984), pp. 46–62.Google Scholar
Bunn, George “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Codifying Nuclear Deterrence?” Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Pugwash Symposium on the Arms Race and International Law (1983).
Burnham, James, The Struggle for the World (New York: The John Day Co., 1947).Google Scholar
Burr, William, “U.S Nuclear History: Nuclear Arms and Politics in the Missile Age 1955–1968,” Digital National Security Archive at http://nsarchive.chadwyck.com/collections/nh_essay.jsp
Burr, William, “The Nixon Administration, the ‘Horror Strategy,’ and the Search for Limited Nuclear Options, 1969–1972,” Journal of Cold War Studies, vol. 7, no. 3 (Summer 2005), pp. 34–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, William, and Kimball, Jeffrey, “Nixon's Secret Nuclear Alert: Vietnam War Diplomacy and the Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test, October 1969,” Cold War History, vol. 3, no. 2 (January 2003), pp. 113–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Richard, “Defense and Arms Control: Defining the Problem,” in Bernard, F. Halloran, ed., Essays on Arms Control and National Security (US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Washington, DC, 1986), pp. 187–210.Google Scholar
Byrne, Paul, The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (London: Croom Helm, 1988).Google Scholar
Campbell, David, Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics and the Narratives of the Gulf War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1993).Google Scholar
Cancian, Francesca, What Are Norms? A Study of Beliefs and Action in a Maya Community (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Carnesale, Albert, et al., Living With Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Carter, April, Peace Movements: International Protests and World Politics Since 1945 (London: Longman, 1992).Google Scholar
Catudal, Honore M., Soviet Strategy from Stalin to Gorbachev (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities, 1989).Google Scholar
Cerniello, Craig, “Clinton Issues New Guidelines on U. S. Nuclear Weapons Doctrine,” Arms Control Today, vol. 27, no. 8 (November/December 1997), p. 23.Google Scholar
“The Challenge of Peace: God's Promise and Our Response,” A Pastoral Letter on War and Peace, May 3, 1983, National Conference of Catholic Bishops (Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference, 1983).
Chang, Gordon H., “To the Brink: Eisenhower, Dulles and the Quemoy–Matsu Crisis,” International Security, vol. 12, no. 4 (Spring 1988), pp. 96–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauvistre, Eric, The Implications of IAEA Inspections under Security Council Resolution 687 (New York: United Nations, 1992).Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, “An Inquiry into the Workings of Arms Control Agreements,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 85, no. 5 (March 1972), pp. 905–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Antonia Handler, and Abram Chayes, “Nonproliferation Regimes in the Aftermath of the Gulf War,” in Nye, Joseph and Smith, Roger, eds., After the Storm: Lessons from the Gulf War, The Aspen Institute (Lanham, MD: Madison Books, 1992), pp. 49–80.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T., “Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 43 (1999), pp. 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
China's Nuclear Policy, the Nuclear Threat Initiative, at www.nti.org/db/china/index/html.
Cillessen, Bret J., “Embracing the Bomb: Ethics, Morality and Nuclear Deterrence in the US Air Force, 1945–55,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 21, no. 1 (March 1998), pp. 96–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirincione, Joseph, ed., Repairing the Regime: Preventing the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction (New York: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
Claude, Inis L. Jr., “Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations,” International Organization, vol. 20, no. 3 (Summer 1966), pp. 367–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, Peter, Nonproliferation and the National Interest: America's Response to the Spread of Nuclear Weapons (New York: HarperCollins, 1993).Google Scholar
Clodfelter, Mark, The Limits of Air Power: The American Bombing of Vietnam (New York: Free Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Cohen, Avner, Israel and the Bomb (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Cohen, Avner “Israel and the Nuclear Taboo,” unpublished paper, University of Maryland, 1999.
Cohen, Roger, and Gatti, Claudio, In the Eye of the Storm: The Life of General H. Norman Schwarzkopf (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1991).Google Scholar
Cohen, Sheldon, Arms and Judgement: Law, Morality and the Conduct of War in the 20th Century (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Cole, Leonard A., The Eleventh Plague: The Politics of Biological and Chemical Warfare (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1997).Google Scholar
Collina, Tom Zamora, “South Africa Bridges the Gap,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 5 (July/August 1995), pp. 27–31.Google Scholar
Cordesman, Anthony H., “Radiological Weapons as a Means of Attack,” November 30, 2001, at www.csis.org/burke/hd/reports/ radiological.pdf.
Cortwright, David, Peace Works: The Citizen's Role in Ending the Cold War (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1993).Google Scholar
Cousins, Norman, “The Literacy of Survival,” The Saturday Review, September 14, 1946, p. 14.Google Scholar
Craig, Campbell, Destroying the Village: Eisenhower and Thermonuclear War (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Crane, Conrad C., “To Avert Impending Disaster: American Military Plans to Use Atomic Weapons During the Korean War,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 23, no. 2 (June 2000), pp. 72–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daalder, Ivo H., The Nature and Practice of Flexible Response (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
D'Amato, Anthony, The Concept of Custom in International Law (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Boer, Connie, “The Polls: Our Commitment to WWIII,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 1 (Spring 1981), pp. 126–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boer, ConnieThe Polls: The European Peace Movement and the Deployment of Nuclear Missiles,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 1 (Spring 1985), pp. 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Jonathan, and Laurenti, Jeffrey, Options and Opportunities: Arms Control and Disarmament for the 21st Century (New York: United Nations Association, 1997).Google Scholar
Decosse, David E., ed., But Was it Just? Reflections on the Morality of the Persian Gulf War (New York: Doubleday, 1992).Google Scholar
Deery, Phillip, “The Dove Flies East: Whitehall, Warsaw, and the 1950 World Peace Congress,” Australian Journal of Politics and History, vol. 48, no. 2 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewes, Kate, and Green, Robert, “The World Court Project: History and Consequences,” Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, vol. 7, no. 1 (Fall 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanapala, Jayantha with Rydell, Randy, Multilateral Diplomacy and the NPT: An Insider's Account (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 2005).Google Scholar
Diamond, Howard, “India Releases Nuclear Doctrine, Looks to Emulate P-5 Arsenals,” Arms Control Today, vol. 29, no. 5 (July/August 1999), p. 23.Google Scholar
Dingman, Roger, “Atomic Diplomacy During the Korean War,” International Security, vol. 13, no. 3 (Winter 1988/89), pp. 50–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divine, Robert, Blowing on the Wind: The Nuclear Test Ban Debate, 1954–1960 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Dockrill, Saki, Eisenhower's New-Look National Security Policy, 1953–61 (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (London: Routledge, 1966/95).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dower, John W., War Without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War (New York: Pantheon Books, 1986).Google Scholar
Dowler, Thomas W., and Howard, Joseph S. II, “Countering the Threat of the Well-Armed Tyrant: A Modest Proposal for Small Nuclear Weapons,” Strategic Review, vol. 19, no. 4 (Fall 1991), pp. 34–40.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael, “Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 12, no. 3 (1983), pp. 205–35.Google Scholar
Draper, Theodore, “How Not to Think About Nuclear War,” New York Review of Books, vol. 29, July 15, 1982.Google Scholar
Drell, Sidney, Goodby, James, Jeanloz, Raymond, and Peurifoy, Robert, “A Strategic Choice: New Bunker Busters Versus Nonproliferation,” Arms Control Today, vol. 33, no. 2 (March 2003), p. 8.Google Scholar
Dulles, John Foster, “Challenge and Response in United States Policy,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 36, no. 1 (October 1957), pp. 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Lewis A., “Global Nuclear Order in an Era of Proliferation,” in Gottemueller, Rose, ed., Strategic Arms Control in the Post-START Era, IISS (London: Brassey's, 1992).Google Scholar
Dunnigan, James F., and Bay, Austin, From Shield to Storm: High-Tech Weapons, Military Strategy and Coalition Warfare in the Persian Gulf (New York: William Morrow & Co., 1992).Google Scholar
Dyson, Freeman, Disturbing the Universe (New York: Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar
Eden, Lynn, Constructing Destruction: Organizations, Knowledge, and the Effects of Nuclear Weapons (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Ederington, L. Benjamin, , and Mazarr, Michael J., eds., Turning Point: The Gulf War and U. S. Military Strategy (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, JonSocial Norms and Economic Theory,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 3, no. 4 (Fall 1989), pp. 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enthoven, Alain C., “1963 Nuclear Strategy Revisited,” in Henry, P. Ford and Francis, X. Winters, , S. J., eds., Ethics and Nuclear Strategy? (Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 1977), pp. 72–81.Google Scholar
Epstein, William, “NPT Wrap-Up: Indefinite Extension – With Increased Accountability,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 4 (July/August 1995), pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
Epstein, William “Tlatelolco and a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World,” in Pericles Alves, Gasparini and Cipollone, Daiana Belinda, eds., Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones in the 21st Century (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1997), pp. 23–27.Google Scholar
Erdmann, Andrew P. N., “War No Longer Has Any Logic Whatever: Dwight D. Eisenhower and the Thermonuclear Revolution,” in Gaddis, John Lewiset al., eds., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, Hazel Gaudet, “The Polls: Atomic Weapons and Nuclear Energy,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 27 (1963), pp. 155–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew, Innovation and the Arms Race: How the United States and the Soviet Union Develop New Military Technologies (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Evangelista, MatthewUnarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, “The Special Challenge of Our Times: Cultural Norms Related to Nuclearism,” in Westing, Arthur, ed., Cultural Norms, War and the Environment, SIPRI (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 53–63.Google Scholar
Falk, RichardNuclear Weapons, International Law and the World Court: A Historic Encounter,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 91, no. 64 (1997), pp. 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Richard, Meyrowitz, Elliot, and Sanderson, Jack, Legal Order in a Violent World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, Elliot Meyrowitz, and Jack SandersonNuclear Weapons and International Law, Occasional Paper No. 10 (Center of International Studies, Princeton University, 1981).
Farley, Philip, “Strategic Arms Control, 1967–87,” in George, Alexanderet al., eds., U. S.–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 215–53.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo and Helene, Lambert, “Courting Controversy: International Law, National Norms and American Nuclear Use,” Review of International Studies, vol. 27 (2001), pp. 309–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearey, Bryan L., White, Paul C., Ledger, John St., and Immele, John D., “An Analysis of Reduced Collateral Damage Nuclear Weapons,” Comparative Strategy, vol. 22, no. 4 (October/November 2003), pp. 304–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James, “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,” World Politics, vol. 43 (January 1991), pp. 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federov, Yuri, “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Russia's Doctrine on Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Pugwash Conference, London, November 2002.
Feifer, George, Tennozan: The Battle for Okinawa and the Atomic Bomb (New York: Ticknor & Fields, 1992).Google Scholar
Feis, Herbert, Japan Subdued: The Atomic Bomb and the End of the Cold War in the Pacific (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Findlay, Trevor, Nuclear Dynamite: The Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Fiasco (Sydney: Brassey's Australia, 1990).Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4 (1998), pp. 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firmage, Edwin Brown, “The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 63, no. 4 (October 1969), pp. 729–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Catherine, Reformation and Resistance: Nongovernmental Organizations and the Future of Nuclear Weapons, Report No. 29 (Washington, DC: Henry L. Stimson Center, 1999).Google Scholar
FitzGerald, Frances, Way Out There in the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars, and the End of the Cold War (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000).Google Scholar
Florini, Ann, “The Evolution of International Norms,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 3 (September 1996), pp. 363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Rosemary, The Practice of Power: US Relations With China since 1949 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Foot, RosemaryThe Wrong War: American Policy and Dimensions of the Korean Conflict (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Foot, RosemaryNuclear Coercion and the Ending of the Korean Conflict,” International Security, vol. 13 (Winter 1988–89), pp. 92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish (New York: Vintage, 1977).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, Deterrence (Cambridge: Polity, 2004).Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy (New York: St. Martin's, 1989), 2nd edn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, and Karsh, Efraim, The Gulf Conflict, 1990–91 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Fried, John H. E., “First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Existing Prohibitions in International Law,” Bulletin of Peace Proposals, vol. 1 (1981).Google Scholar
Frye, Alton, “Slow Fuse on the Neutron Bomb,” Foreign Policy, no. 31 (Summer 1978), pp. 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Hisakaju, International Regulation of the Use of Nuclear Weapons (Osaka, Japan: Kansai University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Furguson, Charles D., and Potter, William C., The Four Faces of Nuclear Terrorism (Monterey: Monterey Institute, Center for Nonproliferation Studies, 2004).Google Scholar
Fursenko, Aleksandr, and Naftali, Timothy, One Hell of a Gamble: Khrushchev, Castro, and Kennedy, 1958–1964 (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997).Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis, “The Origins of Self-Deterrence: The United States and the Nonuse of Nuclear Weapons, 1945–1958,” in Gaddis, , The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 104–46.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis “The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in the Postwar International System,” in Gaddis, , The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 215–45.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John LewisWe Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis, Gordon, Philip H., May, Ernest R., and Rosenberg, Jonathan, eds., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb: Nuclear Diplomacy since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaiduk, Ilya, The Soviet Union and the Vietnam War (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1996).Google Scholar
Gallicchio, Marc, “After Nagasaki: General Marshall's Plan for the Use of Tactical Nuclear Weapons,” Prologue: Quarterly of the National Archives, vol. 24, no. 4 (Winter 1991), pp. 396–404.Google Scholar
Ganapathy, Arumugam, “The Treaty on the South-East Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone,” in Alves, Pericles Gasparini and Cipollone, Daiana Belinda, eds., Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones in the 21st Century (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1997), pp. 59–62.Google Scholar
Gardner, Gary T., Nuclear Non-Proliferation: A Primer (Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner, 1994).Google Scholar
Garthoff, Raymond, Détente and Confrontation: American–Soviet Relations from Nixon to Reagan (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1994), rev. edn.Google Scholar
Gaskins, Richard H., Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Gehring, Verna, “The Nuclear Taboo,” Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, Summer 2000, at www.puaf.umd.edu/IPPP/Summer00/nuclear_taboo.htm.
Geiger, H. Jack, “Bomb Now, Die Later: The Consequences of Infrastructure Destruction for Iraqi Civilians in the Gulf War,” in O'Loughlin, John, Meyer, Tom, and Greenberg, Edward, eds., War and its Consequences: Lessons from the Persian Gulf Conflict (New York: HarperCollins, 1994).Google Scholar
Geller, Daniel S., “Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, and Crisis Escalation,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 34, no. 2 (June 1990), pp. 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentile, Gian P., “Advocacy or Assessment? The United States Strategic Bombing Survey of Germany and Japan,” Pacific Historical Review, vol. 66 (February 1997), pp. 53–79.Google Scholar
Girrier, Catherine, The No-First-Use Issue in American Nuclear Weapons Policy: 1945–1957 (Memoire de diplome, Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales, Geneva, 1985).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., “U. S.–Soviet Efforts to Cooperate in Crisis Management and Crisis Avoidance,” in Alexander, L. George, Farley, Philip, and Dallin, Alexander, eds., U. S.–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 581–99.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Richard, Smoke, Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice (New York: Columbia University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., Farley, Philip, and Dallin, Alexander, eds., US–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Germany Raises No-First-Use Issue at NATO Meeting,” Arms Control Today, vol. 28, no. 8 (November/December 1998), p. 24.
Gest, Howard, “The July 1945 Szilard Petition on the Atomic Bomb: Memoir by a Signer in Oak Ridge,” undated manuscript at www.bio.indiana.edu/Gest/HGSzilard.html.
Gittinger, Ted, ed., The Johnson Years: A Vietnam Roundtable (Austin, TX: Lyndon Baines Johnson Library: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, 1993).Google Scholar
Gizewski, Peter, “From Winning Weapon to Destroyer of the World: The Nuclear Taboo in International Politics,” International Journal, vol. 51, no. 2 (Summer 1996), pp. 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Charles L., “The Flawed Case for Nuclear Disarmament,” Survival, vol. 40, no. 4 (Spring 1998), pp. 112–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Charles L., and Steve Fetter, , “National Missile Defense and the Future of U. S. Nuclear Weapons Policy,” International Security, vol. 26, no. 1 (Summer 2001), pp. 40–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasstone, Samuel, and Dolan, P. J., eds., Effects of Nuclear Weapons (Washington, DC: US Department of Defense and Energy Research and Development Administration, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Stanley, “What Did Truman Know, and When Did He Know It?” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 54, no. 3 (May/June 1998), pp. 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldblat, Jozef, “Issues Facing the 1995 NPT Extension Conference,” Security Dialogue, vol. 23, no. 4 (1992).Google Scholar
Goldblat, Jozef “Making Nuclear Weapons Illegal,” in Steinberger, Jack, Udgaonkar, Bhalchandra, and Rotblat, Joseph, eds., A Nuclear-Weapon-Free World (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993), pp. 153–68.Google Scholar
Goldblat, Jozef “Prospects for a Ban on the Use of Nuclear Weapons,” paper presented at the Third International Security Forum Zurich, Switzerland October 1998.
Gong, Gerrit, The Standard of Civilization in International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael R., and Trainor, General Bernard E., The General's War: The Inside Story of the Conflict in the Gulf (Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co., 1995).Google Scholar
Gormley, Dennis M., and Mahnken, Thomas G., “Facing Nuclear and Conventional Reality,” Orbis, vol. 44, no. 1 (Winter 2000), pp. 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottemueller, Rose, ed., Strategic Arms Control in the Post-START Era, IISS (London: Brassey's, 1992).Google Scholar
Gottfried, Kurt, Kendall, Henry W. M, and Lee, John M., “‘No First Use’ of Nuclear Weapons,” Scientific American, vol. 250, no. 3 (March 1984), pp. 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Thomas W., American Public Opinion on NATO, Extended Deterrence, and the Use of Nuclear Weapons: Future Fission?, CSIA Occasional Paper No. 4 (Cambridge, MA: Center for Science and International Affairs, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, and University Press of America, 1989).Google Scholar
Graham, Thomas, “Strengthening Arms Control,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 2 (Spring 2000), pp. 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Colin S., Nuclear Strategy and National Style (Lanham, MD: Hamilton Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gray, Colin S.An International ‘Norm’ Against Nuclear Weapons? The British Case,” Comparative Strategy, vol. 20 (2001), pp. 231–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenpeace, , Iraqi Deaths From the Gulf War as of December 1991 (Greenpeace, 1991).Google Scholar
Gusterson, Hugh, “Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination,” Cultural Anthropology, vol. 14, no. 1 (1999), pp. 111–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halperin, Morton H., “Proposal for a Ban on the Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Institute for Defense Analyses, Special Studies Group, Study Memorandum No. 4 (Washington, DC: IDA, 1961).
Halperin, Morton H., Limited War in the Nuclear Age (New York: Wiley, 1963).Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell, One for All: The Logic of Group Conflict (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Harwit, Martin, An Exhibit Denied: Lobbying the History of the Enola Gay (New York: Copernicus Books, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselkorn, Avigdor, The Continuing Storm: Iraq, Poisonous Weapons and Deterrence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Hashmi, Sohail H., and Lee, Steven P., eds., Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Religious and Secular Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Peter, Pacific Powderkeg: American Nuclear Dilemmas in Korea (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1991).Google Scholar
Hayes, Peter, and Tannenwald, Nina, “Nixing Nukes in Vietnam,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 59, no. 3 (May/June 2003), pp. 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidenrich, John G., “The Gulf War: How Many Iraqis Died?” Foreign Policy, no. 90 (Spring 1993), pp. 108–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herken, Gregg, The Winning Weapon: The Atomic Bomb in the Cold War (New York: Knopf, 1981).Google Scholar
Herken, GreggCounsels of War (New York: Knopf, 1985).Google Scholar
Herken, GreggCardinal Choices: Presidential Science Advising from the Atomic Bomb to SDI (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Herring, George, America's Longest War: The United States and Vietnam, 1950–1975 (New York: Wiley, 1996), 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Herron, Kerry G., and Jenkis-Smith, Hank C., Public Perspectives on Nuclear Security: U. S. National Security Surveys, 1993–1997 (Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Institute for Public Policy, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersey, John, “Hiroshima,” New Yorker, August 31, 1946.Google Scholar
Hersh, Seymour M., The Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House (New York: Summit Books, 1983).Google Scholar
Hershberg, James G., James B. Conant: Harvard to Hiroshima and the Making of the Nuclear Age (New York: Knopf, 1993).Google Scholar
Hershberg, James G.A Footnote on Hiroshima and Atomic Morality: Conant, Niebuhr, and an ‘Emotional’ Clergyman, 1945–46,” Newsletter – Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations (December 2002).Google Scholar
Heuser, Beatrice, The Bomb: Nuclear Weapons in their Historic, Strategic and Ethical Context (London: Longmans, 2000).Google Scholar
Higuchi, Toshihiro, “Clean' Bombs: Nuclear Technology and Nuclear Strategy in the 1950s,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 29, no. 1 (February 2006), pp. 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Bruce, “Terrorists and WMD: Some Preliminary Hypotheses,” Nonproliferation Review, vol. 4, no. 3 (Spring–Summer 1997), pp. 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Stanley, Duties Beyond Borders (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Hoodbhoy, Pervez, and Zia Mian, “The India–Pakistan conflict – Towards the Failure of Nuclear Deterrence,” Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad and Princeton University, September 2002, www.gakushuin.ac.jp/~881791/hoodbhoy/Deterrence.html.
Horner, Charles A., “Policy Consideration in Using Nuclear Weapons,” Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, vol. 8, no. 7 (1997), pp. 15–21.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael, Andreopoulos, George J., and Shulman, Mark R., eds., The Laws of War: Constraints on Warfare in the Western World (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel, “The Clash of Civilizations,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, no. 3 (Summer 1993), pp. 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikle, Fred Charles, “NATO's First Nuclear Use: A Deepening Trap?” Strategic Review, vol. 8 (Winter 1980), pp. 18–38.Google Scholar
Immerman, Richard, “Eisenhower and Dulles: Who Made the Decisions?” Political Psychology, vol. 1, no. 2 (1979), pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglis, D. R. and Sandler, C. L., “A Special Report on Plowshare: Problems and Prospects: The Non-military Use of Nuclear Explosives,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 23, no. 10 (1967), pp. 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Jason Division: Division Consultants Who Are Also Professors are Attacked,” Science, February 2, 1973, pp. 459–62, 505.
Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Jervis, RobertCooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics, vol. 30, no. 2 (January 1978), pp. 167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, RobertDeterrence Theory Revisited,” World Politics, vol. 31, no. 2 (January 1979), pp. 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, RobertThe Illogic of American Nuclear Strategy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Jervis, RobertThe Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Jervis, RobertThe Military History of the Cold War,” Diplomatic History, vol. 15, no. 1 (Winter 1991), pp. 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert, Lebow, Richard Ned, and Stein, Janice Gross, eds., Psychology and Deterrence (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Jian, Chen, “China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964–69,” The China Quarterly, no. 142 (June 1995), pp. 356–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jochnick, Chris af, and Normand, Roger, “The Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Laws of War,” Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 35, no. 49 (Winter 1994), pp. 49–95.Google Scholar
Joffe, Joseph, “Peace and Populism: Why the European Anti-nuclear Movement Failed,” International Security, vol. 11, no. 4 (Spring 1987), pp. 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, James Turner, Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Johnson, Rebecca, “NPT Report: The 2002 Prepcom: Papering Over the Cracks?” Disarmament Diplomacy, no. 64 (May/June 2002).Google Scholar
Kahn, Herman, “Nuclear Proliferation and Rules of Retaliation,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 76, no. 1 (November 1966), pp. 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Herman, “Thinking About Nuclear Morality,” New York Times Magazine, June 13, 1982.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W., “Nuclear Weapons and the Rule of Law,” NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, vol. 31, no. 2 (Winter/Spring 1999), pp. 349–415.Google Scholar
Kaiser, David, American Tragedy: Kennedy, Johnson and the Origins of the Vietnam War (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Kalb, Marvin, and Kalb, Bernard, Kissinger (Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co., 1974).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Fred, “JFK's First Strike Plan,” vol. 288, no. 3, The Atlantic Monthly (October 2001), pp. 81–86.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Fred, The Wizards of Armageddon (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983).Google Scholar
Kapur, Ashok, “Non-Proliferation: Western Biases,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 1 (January/February 1995), pp. 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, Regina Cowan, ed., Security With Nuclear Weapons? Different Perspectives on National Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Katz, Milton S., Ban The Bomb: A History of SANE: the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy, 1957–1985 (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1986).Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, and Okawara, Nobuo, “Japan, Asian-Pacific Security and the Case for Analytical Eclectism,” International Security, vol. 26, no. 3 (Winter 2001/02), pp. 153–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, Alexander Wendt, and Ronald Jepperson, “Norms, Identity and Culture in National Security,” in Katzenstein, Peter, ed., The Culture of National Security (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), pp. 33–75.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, William W., “The Requirements of Deterrence,” in Kaufman, , ed., Military Policy and National Security (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1956), pp. 12–38.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, William W.The McNamara Strategy (New York: Harper & Row, 1964).Google Scholar
Keal, Paul, Unspoken Rules and Superpower Dominance (New York: St. Martin's, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kegley, Charles W. Jr. and Raymond, Gregory A., “Normative Constraints on the Use of Force Short of War,” Journal of Peace Research, vol. 23, no. 3 (September 1986), pp. 213–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegley, Charles, and Schwab, Kenneth L., eds., After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Keller, Bill, “The Second Nuclear Age,” New York Times Magazine, May 4, 2003.Google Scholar
Keeley, James F., “Toward a Foucauldian Analysis of International Regimes,” International Organization, vol. 44, no. 1 (Winter 1989–90), pp. 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen Foong, Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Kier, Elizabeth, and Mercer, Jonathan, “Setting Precedents in Anarchy: Military Intervention and Weapons of Mass Destruction,” International Security, vol. 20, no. 4 (Spring 1996), pp. 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, Jeffrey, Nixon's Vietnam War (Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 1998).Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A., Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A.Diplomacy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994).Google Scholar
Klare, Michael T., “High-Death Weapons of the Gulf War,” The Nation, vol. 252, no. 21, June 3, 1991, pp. 721–42.Google Scholar
Kleidman, Robert, Organizing for Peace: Neutrality, the Test Ban, and the Freeze (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie, “Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U. S. Sanctions against South Africa,” International Organization, vol. 49, no. 3 (Summer 1995), pp. 451–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knopf, Jeffrey W., Domestic Society and International Cooperation: The Impact of Protest on U. S. Arms Control Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Koblentz, Gregory, “Pathogens as Weapons: The International Security Implications of Biological Warfare,” International Security, vol. 28, no. 3 (Winter 2003/04), pp. 84–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kort, Michael, “Casualty Projections for the Invasion of Japan, Phantom Estimates, and the Math of Barton Bernstein,” Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations Newsletter (December 2003).Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V., Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Keith, “Multilateral Diplomacy, Norm Building and UN Conferences: The Case of Small Arms and Light Weapons,” Global Governance, vol. 8 (2002), pp. 247–63.Google Scholar
Kristensen, Hans M., U. S. Nuclear Strategy Reform in the 1990s, Nautilus Institute Working Paper (March 2000).
Lang, Daniel, “A Reporter at Large,” The New Yorker, June 8, 1946, p. 62.Google Scholar
Larsen, Jeffrey A., ed., Arms Control and a Changing Environment (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002)Google Scholar
Lavoy, Peter R., Sagan, Scott D., and Wirtz, James J., Planning the Unthinkable: How New Nuclear Powers Will Use Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Weapons (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, “The Cuban Missile Crisis: Reading the Lessons Correctly,” Political Science Quarterly, vol. 98 (Fall 1983), pp. 431–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, and Gross Stein, Janice, We All Lost the Cold War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, and Gross Stein, JaniceRational Deterrence Theory: I Think, Therefore I Deter,” World Politics, vol. 41, no. 2 (January 1989), pp. 208–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Steven P., Morality, Prudence, and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leffler, Melvyn, A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W., Cooperation Under Fire: Anglo-German Restraint During World War II (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Lettow, Paul, Ronald Reagan and his Quest to Make Nuclear Weapons Obsolete (New York: Random House, 2006).Google Scholar
Levi, Michael, “Nuclear Bunker Buster Bombs,” Scientific American, vol. 291, no. 2 (August 2004), pp. 66–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, David K., Convention: A Philosophical Study (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Lewis, George, “The Future of U. S. Nonstrategic Forces,” in Flournoy, Michele, ed., Nuclear Weapons After the Cold War: Guidelines for U. S. Policy (New York: HarperCollins, 1993), pp. 104–40.Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael W., “The Law of Aerial Bombardment in the 1991 Gulf War,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 97, no. 3 (July 2003), pp. 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifton, Robert J., and Mitchell, Greg, Hiroshima in America: Fifty Years of Denial (New York: Putnam's, 1995).Google Scholar
Little, Daniel, “Rational Choice Theory,” in Varieties of Social Explanation (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991).
Lockwood, Dunbar, “Nuclear Posture Review Shows Little Change in Policies,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 9 (November 1994), pp. 27, 32.Google Scholar
Lockwood, DunbarThe Status of U. S., Russian, and Chinese Nuclear Forces in Northeast Asia,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 9 (November 1994), pp. 21–24.Google Scholar
Lockwood, DunbarUkraine Accedes (Finally) to NPT; Opens Way to START Reductions,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 10 (December 1994), p. 17.Google Scholar
Lofland, John, Polite Protesters: The American Peace Movement of the 1980s (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, David H., Moral Vision in International Politics, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward, “An Emerging Post-Nuclear Era?” Washington Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 1 (Winter 1988), pp. 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEachin, Douglas J., The Final Months of the War With Japan: Signals Intelligence, U. S. Invasion Planning, and the A-Bomb Decision (Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence, 1998).Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald, and Spinardi, Graham, “Tacit Knowledge, Weapons Design, and the Uninvention of Nuclear Weapons,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 101, no. 1 (July 1995), pp. 44–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMillan, Stuart, Neither Confirm Nor Deny: The Nuclear Ships Dispute Between New Zealand and the United States (New York: Praeger, 1987).Google Scholar
Maddox, Robert, Weapons for Victory: The Hiroshima Decision 50 Years Later (Columbia, MI: University of Missouri, 1995).Google Scholar
Madsen, Mark H. “The Image and Impact of World Opinion: Foreign Policy Making and Opinion Abroad,” Ph.D. diss., Harvard Dept. of Government, 1986.
Mandelbaum, Michael, The Nuclear Revolution: International Politics Before and After Hiroshima (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 240–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangano, Joseph J., Sternglass, Ernest J., Gould, Jay M., Sherman, Janette D., Brown, Jerry, and McDonnell, William, “Strontium-90 in Newborns and Childhood Disease,” Archives of Environmental Health, vol. 55, no. 4 (July/August 2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P., “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4 (Autumn 1998), pp. 949–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Susan B., “Realism and Weapons of Mass Destruction: A Consequentialist Analysis,” in Hashmi, Sohail H. and Lee, Steven P., eds., Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Susan B.The Role of Biological Weapons in International Politics: The Real Military Revolution,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 25, no. 1 (March 2002), pp. 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mass and Elite Views on Nuclear Security: U. S. National Security Surveys, 1993– 1999, University of New Mexico Institute of Public Policy, at http://bush.tamu.edu/content/faculty/nsp/99_vol2.html.
Matlock, Jack R., Autopsy on an Empire: The American Ambassador's Account of the Collapse of the Soviet Union (New York: Random House, 1995).Google Scholar
Mavrodes, George I., “Conventions and the Morality of War,” in Beitz, Charles, Cohen, Marshall, Scanlon, Thomas, and Simmons, A. John, eds., International Ethics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985), pp. 75–89.Google Scholar
May, Ernest R., and Zelikow, Philip D., The Kennedy Tapes: Inside the White House During the Cuban Missile Crisis (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1997).Google Scholar
McCrea, Frances B., and Markle, Gerald E., Minutes to Midnight: Nuclear Weapons Protest in America (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989).Google Scholar
McElroy, Robert W., Morality and American Foreign Policy: The Role of Ethics in International Affairs (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
McGwire, Michael, Military Objectives in Soviet Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings, 1987).Google Scholar
McNamara, Robert, “The Military Role of Nuclear Weapons: Perceptions and Misperceptions,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 62, no. 1 (Fall 1983), pp. 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Robert, Kaysen, Carl, and Rathjens, George, “Nuclear Weapons After the Cold War,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 70, no. 4 (Fall 1991), pp. 95–111.Google Scholar
McNamara, Robert S., Blight, James G., and Brigham, Robert K., Argument Without End (New York: Public Affairs, 1999).Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret, “Tabu,” Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. VII (Macmillan, 1937).Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security, vol. 19, no. 3 (Winter 1994/95), pp. 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meilinger, Philip S., Hoyt S. Vandenberg: The Life of a General (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan, Reputation and International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Miles, Rufus E. Jr., “Hiroshima: The Strange Myth of Half a Million American Lives Saved,” International Security, vol. 10 (Fall 1985), pp. 121–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, Tom, “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Workshop Report, Pugwash Meeting No. 279, November 2002, at www.pugwash.org/reports/nw/milne.htm.
Mlyn, Eric, The State, Society and Limited Nuclear War (Albany, NY: State University Press of New York, 1995).Google Scholar
Morgan, Patrick M., Deterrence: A Conceptual Analysis, vol. 40, Sage Library of Social Research (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1977).Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans, “Is World Opinion a Myth?,” New York Times Magazine, March 25, 1962.Google Scholar
Morris, Roger, Uncertain Greatness: Henry Kissinger and American Foreign Policy (New York: Harper & Row, 1977).Google Scholar
Morrison, Philip, and Tsipis, Kosta, “Rightful Names,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 59, no. 3 (May/June 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, James D., “The Laws of War, Common Conjectures and Legal Systems in International Politics,” Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 31, pt. 2 (January 2002), pp. S41–S60.Google Scholar
“The Most Terrible Bomb of All,” U. S. News and World Report, May 30, 1960.
Most, Benjamin A., and Starr, Harvey, “International Relations Theory, Foreign Policy Substitutability, and Nice Laws,” World Politics, vol. 36, no. 3 (April 1984), pp. 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moxley, Charles Jr., Nuclear Weapons and International Law in the Post-Cold War World (Lanham, MD: Austin & Winfield, 2000).Google Scholar
Mueller, John, War, Presidents and Public Opinion (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1973).Google Scholar
Mueller, JohnRetreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War (New York: Basic Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Mueller, John “American Public Opinion and the Gulf War,” in Renshon, Stanley A., ed., The Political Psychology of the Gulf War: Leaders, Publics, and the Conflict Process (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1993), pp. 199–226.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald, “Maintaining Non-Nuclear Weapons Status,” in Cowan Karp, Regina, ed., Security With Nuclear Weapons? Different Perspectives on National Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 301–39.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald “The Internalization of Principles, Norms and Rules by Governments: The Case of Security Regimes,” in Rittberger, Volker, ed., Regime Theory and International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993), pp. 361–88.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald, Kotter, Wolfgang, and Fischer, David, Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Global Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Munves, James, “Nuclear Arms, the Law and You,” Nuclear Times, April 1983.Google Scholar
Murray, Thomas, Nuclear Policy for War and Peace (Cleveland, OH: World Publishing Co., 1960).Google Scholar
Myrdal, Alva, The Game of Disarmament: How the United States and Russia Run the Arms Race (New York: Pantheon, 1976).Google Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan, “Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society,” International Organization, vol. 44, no. 4 (Autumn 1990), pp. 479–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanda, Ved, and Krieger, David, Nuclear Weapons and the World Court (Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers, 1998).Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert W., “Nuclear ‘Bunker Busters’ Would More Likely Disperse Than Destroy Buried Stockpiles of Biological and Chemical Agents,” Science and Global Security, vol. 12, nos. 1–2 (January/August 2004), pp. 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Agenda Coalition, “Nonproliferation and Disarmament Go Hand in Hand,” International Herald Tribune, September 22, 2004.
Newhouse, John, War and Peace in the Nuclear Age (New York: Knopf, 1989).Google Scholar
Newman, Robert P., Truman and the Hiroshima Cult (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard M., “Needed in Vietnam: The Will to Win,” Reader's Digest, August 1964, pp. 37–43.Google Scholar
Norris, Robert S., Racing for the Bomb: General Leslie Groves, The Manhattan Project's Indispensable Man (South Royalton, VT: Steerforth Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Norris, Robert, and Arkin, William M., “U. S. Nuclear Stockpile, July 1997,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 53, no. 4 (July/August 1997), pp. 62–63.Google Scholar
Norris, Robert, Arkin, William, and Burr, William, “Where They Were,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 55, no. 6 (November/December 1999), pp. 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Robert, and Kristensen, Hans M., “Global Nuclear Stockpiles, 1945–2002,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 58, no. 6 (November/December 2002), pp. 103–04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Nuclear Notebook,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (January/February, 1991).
Nye, Joseph P., “Nuclear Learning: US–Soviet Security Regimes,” International Organization, vol. 41, no. 3 (Summer 1987), pp. 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph P. “U. S.–Soviet Cooperation in a Non-Proliferation Regime,” in Alexander, L. George, Farley, Philip, and Dallin, Alexander, eds., U. S.–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 335–52.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S., and Smith, Roger K., eds., After the Storm: Lessons from the Gulf War, The Aspen Institute (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1992).Google Scholar
O'Loughlin, John, Meyer, Tom, Greenberg, Edward, eds., War and Its Consequences: Lessons from the Persian Gulf Conflict (New York: HarperCollins, 1994).Google Scholar
O'Neill, Dan, The Firecracker Boys (New York: St. Martin's Griffin, 1995).Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas, World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Osgood, Robert, Limited War: The Challenge to American Strategy (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Osgood, RobertNATO: The Entangling Alliance (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Panofsky, Wolfgang K. H., and Bunn, George, “The Doctrine of the Nuclear-Weapon States and the Future of Non-Proliferation,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 7 (July/August 1994), pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert A., Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Pape, Robert A., and Kaufmann, Chaim, “Explaining Costly International Moral Action: Britain's Sixty-Year Campaign Against the Atlantic Slave Trade,” International Organization, vol. 53, no. 4 (Autumn 1999), pp. 631–68.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V., “Nuclear Taboo and War Initiation in Regional Conflicts,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 39, no. 4 (December 1995), pp. 696–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkovich, George, “Nuclear Proliferation: Think Again,” Foreign Policy, vol. 112 (Fall 1998), pp. 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkovich, GeorgeIndia's Nuclear Bomb (Berkeley: University of California, 2001).Google Scholar
Perry, William J., “Desert Storm and Deterrence,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 70, no. 4 (Fall 1991), pp. 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, John, “Nuclear Threats During the Gulf War,” February 19, 1998 at www.fas.org/irp/eprint/ds-threats.htm.
Porpora, Douglas V., “Cultural Rules and Material Relations,” Sociological Theory, vol. 11, no. 2 (July 1993), pp. 212–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portela, Clara, “The EU and the NPT: Testing the New European Nonproliferation Strategy,” Disarmament Diplomacy, no. 78 (July/August 2004).Google Scholar
Potter, William C., “The Politics of Nuclear Renunciation: The Cases of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine,” Occasional Paper No. 22 (Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center, April 1995).
Prados, John, and Stubbe, Ray W., Valley of Decision: The Seige of Khe Sanh (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1991).Google Scholar
Price, Richard, The Chemical Weapons Taboo (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Price, RichardReversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Landmines,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 3 (Summer 1998), pp. 613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard and Nina Tannenwald, “Norms and Deterrence: The Nuclear and Chemical Weapons Taboos,” in Katzenstein, Peter, ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), pp. 114–52.Google Scholar
The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare, vol. I, SIPRI (New York: Humanities Press, 1971).
“Public Attitudes on Nuclear Weapons: An Opportunity for Leadership” (The Henry L. Stimson Center, Washington, DC, 1998).
Quester, George H., Deterrence Before Hiroshima: The Airpower Background of Modern Strategy (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1966).Google Scholar
Quester, George H. “Conceptions of Nuclear Threshold Status,” in Cowan Karp, Regina, ed., Security With Nuclear Weapons? Different Perspectives on National Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 209–28.Google Scholar
Quester, George H., Nuclear Monopoly (New Brunswick, NY: Transaction Publishers, 2000).Google Scholar
Quester, George H., and Utgoff, Victor A., “Toward an International Nuclear Security Policy,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 4 (1994), pp. 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe, Stephen G.Eisenhower Revisionism: a Decade of Scholarship: Review Article,” Diplomatic History, vol. 17 (Winter 1993), pp. 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R., Taboo (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1939).Google Scholar
Ray, James Lee, “The Abolition of Slavery and the End of International War,” International Organization, vol. 43, no. 3 (Summer 1989), pp. 405–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, Thornton, A Proposal to Neutralize Nuclear Weapons, Center of International Studies, Policy Memo no. 22 (Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson School, 1961).Google Scholar
Read, Thornton, “Limited Strategic War and Tactical Nuclear War,” in Knorr, Klaus and Read, Thornton, eds., Limited Strategic War (New York: Praeger, 1962), pp. 67–116.Google Scholar
Rearden, Steven L., History of the Office of Secretary of Defense, vol. I, The Formative Years 1947–50 (Washington, DC, 1984).Google Scholar
Record, Jeffrey, Hollow Victory: A Contrary View of the Gulf War (New York: Brassey's (US), 1993).Google Scholar
Redick, John R., “Latin America's Emerging Non-Proliferation Consensus,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 2 (March 1994), pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Reiss, Mitchell, Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain their Nuclear Capabilities (Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Renshon, Stanley A., ed., The Political Psychology of the Gulf War: Leaders, Publics, and the Conflict Process (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Rice, Condoleezza, “SALT and the Search for a Security Regime,” in Alexander, L. George, Farley, Philip J., and Dallin, Alexander, eds., U. S.–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Ridgway, Matthew, The Korean War (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1967).Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, “International Norms and Domestic Change: Arguing and Communicative Behavior in the Human Rights Area,” Politics and Society, vol. 27, no. 4 (December 1999), pp. 529–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds., The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, The Zero Option: INF, West Germany and Arms Control (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1988).Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, ThomasCooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U. S. Foreign Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Robertson, David, Sly and Able: A Political Biography of James F. Byrnes (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1994).Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul, “Pursuing a New Nuclear Weapons Policy for the 21st Century,” March 22, 2001, at www.sandia.gov/media/whitepaper/2001-04-Robinson.htm.
Rochon, Thomas R., Mobilizing for Peace: The Antinuclear Movements in Western Europe (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochon, Thomas R., and Meyer, David, eds., Coalitions and Political Movements: The Lessons of the Nuclear Freeze (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1997).Google Scholar
Roman, Peter, “Curtis LeMay and the Origins of NATO Atomic Targeting,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 16, no. 1 (March 1993), pp. 46–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Clive, Campaigns Against Western Defense: NATO's Adversaries and Critics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Mark E., “Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones,” Naval War College Review, vol. 49, no. 4 (Autumn 1996), pp. 44–66.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James, and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, eds., Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, David Alan, “The Origins of Overkill: Nuclear Weapons and American Strategy, 1945–1960,” International Security, vol. 7, no. 4 (Spring 1983), pp. 3–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosendorf, Neal, “John Foster Dulles' Nuclear Schizophrenia,” in Gaddis, John Lewis, Gordon, Philip H., May, Ernest R., and Rosenberg, Jonathan, eds., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb: Nuclear Diplomacy since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 62–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Larry A., “No First Use: A Codification of Deterrence,” unpublished manuscript (Madison, WI: December, 1982).
Rostow, Walt W., The Diffusion of Power (New York: Macmillan, 1972).Google Scholar
Rotblat, Joseph, Scientists in the Quest for Peace: A History of the Pugwash Conferences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Rotblat, JosephLeaving the Bomb Project,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 41, no. 7 (August 1985), pp. 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Steve, “The Publication of ‘Hiroshima’ in The New Yorker,” unpublished paper (Harvard University, 1997).
Rubin, Alfred, “The Neutron Bomb Again,” Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 21, no. 4 (1981), pp. 805–11.Google Scholar
Rubin, Alfred “Nuclear Weapons and International Law,” unpublished manuscript (Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, June 1983).
Rusciano, Frank Louis, et al., World Opinion and the Emerging International Order (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998).Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, “Ethical Dilemmas of Nuclear Deterrance,” International Security, vol. 8, no. 4 (Spring 1984), pp. 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce “The Real Decline of Nuclear Hegemony,” in Rosenau, James and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, eds., Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1989), pp. 177–93.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce “An Acceptable Role for Nuclear Weapons?” in Kegley, Charles and Schwab, Kenneth L., eds., After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991), pp. 121–45.Google Scholar
Russett, BruceGrasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World (Princeton, NJ: University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Rutherford, Kenneth, Brem, Stefen, and Matthew, Richard A., eds., Reframing the Agenda: The Impact of NGO and Middle Power Cooperation in International Security (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003).Google Scholar
Safire, William, “On Language: Weapons of Mass Destruction,” New York Times Magazine, April 19, 1998, p. 22.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott, The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Sagan, ScottPerils of Proliferation,” International Security, vol. 18, no. 4 (Spring 1994), pp. 77–81.Google Scholar
Sagan, ScottWhy Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb,” International Security, vol. 21, no. 3 (Winter 1996/97), pp. 54–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagan, Scott “Realist Perspectives on Ethical Norms and Weapons of Mass Destruction,” in Hashmi, Sohail H. and Lee, Steven P., eds., Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Religious and Secular Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ralph, “Nuclear Dynamite: A New Dimension in Foreign Policy,” Orbis, vol. 4, no. 1 (1960), pp. 307–22.Google Scholar
Saunders, Philip and Jing-Dong Yuan, “China's Strategic Force Modernization: Issues and Implications for the United States,” Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies, 2000, at cns.miis.edu/cns/projects/eanp/conf/op4_sjd.pdf.
Sayle, Murray, “Letter from Hiroshima: Did the Bomb End the War?” New Yorker, July 31, 1995, pp. 40–64.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey, “Normative Explanations,” in Braybrooke, David, ed., Social Rules: Origin, Character, Logic, Change (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996), pp. 35–51.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Ronald, Wings of Judgement: American Bombing in World War II (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Schapiro, Mark, “Mutiny on the Nuclear Bounty: Nonaligned versus the Bomb,” The Nation, vol. 227, no. 22 (December 27, 1993), pp. 798–800.Google Scholar
Scheer, Robert, With Enough Shovels: Reagan, Bush and Nuclear War (New York: Random House, 1982).Google Scholar
Scheinman, Lawrence, “The Non-Proliferation Treaty: On the Road to 1995,” IAEA Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 1 (1992).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas, Nuclear Weapons and Limited War (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1959).Google Scholar
Schelling, ThomasThe Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1960, reprint 1980).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas “The Role of Nuclear Weapons,” in Ederington, L. Benjamin and Mazarr, Michael J., eds., Turning Point: The Gulf War and U. S. Military Stratetgy (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994), pp. 105–15.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas “Forward”, in Larsen, Jeffrey A., ed., Arms Control and a Changing Environment (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas “The Legacy of Hiroshima: A Half-Century without Nuclear War,” Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, at www.puaf.umd.edu/IPPP/Summer00/legacy_of_hiroshima.htm.
Schimmelfennig, Frank, “Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union,” International Organization, vol. 55, no. 1 (2001), pp. 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlaim, Avi, The United States and the Berlin Blockade, 1948–49 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., “The International Court of Justice and the Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Naval War College Review, vol. 51, no. 2 (Spring 1998), pp. 91–116.Google Scholar
Schnabel, James F. and Watson, Robert J., The History of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, vol. III, Korean War, part 1 (Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1979).Google Scholar
Schnell, Jonathan, The Gift of Time: The Case for Abolishing Nuclear Weapons Now (New York: Henry Holt, 1998).Google Scholar
Schwartz, David N., “A Historical Perspective,” in Steinbruner, John D. and Sigal, Leon V., eds., Alliance Security: NATO and the No-First-Use Question (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1983), pp. 5–21.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Stephen I., ed., Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of U. S. Nuclear Weapons Since 1940 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Seaborg, Glenn T., with Loeb, Benjamin, Stemming the Tide: Arms Control in the Johnson Years (Lexington, KY: Lexington Books, 1987).Google Scholar
Searle, John R., The Construction of Social Reality (New York: The Free Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Serrano, Monica, “Latin America – The Treaty of Tlatelolco,” in Thakur, Ramesh, ed., Nuclear Weapons-Free Zones (New York: St. Martin's, 1998), pp. 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Adam, “Nuclear Weapons Free Zones: The Solution to Nuclear Disarmament?”, UN Chronicle, vol. 41, no. 3 (2004).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Mark, “Mutiny on the Nuclear Bounty: Nonaligned versus the Bomb,” The Nation, December 27, 1993.Google Scholar
Shen, Dingli, “Toward a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World: A Chinese Perspective,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 2 (March/April 1994), pp. 51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, Martin, A World Destroyed: The Atomic Bomb and the Grand Alliance (New York: Knopf, 1975).Google Scholar
Sigal, Leon V., Fighting to a Finish: The Politics of War Termination in the United States and Japan, 1945 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Simpson, John, and Howlett, Darryl, “The NPT Renewal Conference: Stumbling Toward 1995,” International Security, vol. 19, no. 1 (Summer 1994), pp. 41–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Jasjit, “Indian Draft Nuclear Doctrine: Some Reflections,” September 1999, at www.pugwash.org/reports/nw/nw7.htm.
SIPRI, “The Non-Use of CB Weapons during World War II,” in The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare, vols. I and II (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1971).
SIPRI “The Right to Conduct Nuclear Explosions: Political Aspects and Policy Proposals,” Stockholm Paper No. 6 (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 1975).
SIPRIYearbook 1990: World Armaments and Disarmament (Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 1990).
Smith, Alice Kimball, A Peril and a Hope: The Scientists' Movement in America, 1945–47 (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Smith, Jackie, Chatfield, Charles, and Pugnucco, Ron, eds., Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Snow, C. P., “The Moral Un-Neutrality of Science,” Science, vol. 133, no. 3448 (January 27, 1961), p. 259.
Snowden, Lynn, “How Likely are Terrorists to Use a Nuclear Strategy?” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 46, no. 6 (February 2003), pp. 699–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H., Deterrence and Defense (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, Richard, The Impact of Public Opinion on U. S. Foreign Policy Since Vietnam (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Sokov, Nikolai, “Russia's New National Security Concept: The Nuclear Angle” (January 2000, revised July 2004), at www.nti.org/db/nisprofs/over/concept.htm.
Sokov, NikolaiWhy Do States Rely on Nuclear Weapons? The Case of Russia and Beyond,” The Nonproliferation Review, vol. 9, no. 2 (Summer 2002), pp. 101–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokov, Nikolai “Russia's Nuclear Doctrine,” Research Report, Center for Nonproliferation Studies, August 2004, at www.nti.org/_research/3_55a.html.
Soman, Appu K., Double-Edged Sword: Nuclear Diplomacy in Unequal Conflicts: The United States and China, 1950–58 (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000).Google Scholar
Spanier, John W., and Nogee, Joseph L., The Politics of Disarmament: A Study of Soviet–American Gamesmanship (New York: Praeger, 1962).Google Scholar
Spector, Leonard, The Undeclared Bomb (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1988).Google Scholar
Stein, Peter, and Feaver, Peter, Assuring Control of Nuclear Weapons: The Evolution of Permissive Action Links (Cambridge, MA: Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, 1987).Google Scholar
Steinberger, Jack, Udgaonkar, Bhalchandra, and Rotblat, Joseph, eds., A Nuclear-Weapon-Free World (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Steinbruner, John, “Renovating Arms Control Through Reassurance,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 2 (Spring 2000), pp. 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbruner, John D., and Sigal, Leon V., eds., Alliance Security: NATO and the No-First-Use Question (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1983).Google Scholar
Steiner, Franz, Taboo (London: Cohen and West, 1956).Google Scholar
Stern, Jessica, “Terrorist Motivations and Unconventional Weapons,” in Lavoy, Peter R., Sagan, Scott D., and Wirtz, James J., Planning the Unthinkable: How New Nuclear Powers Will Use Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Weapons (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000), pp. 202–29.Google Scholar
Stern, Paul, Axelrod, Robert, Jervis, Robert, and Radnor, Roy, eds., Perspectives on Deterrence (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Stern, Sheldon, Averting the ‘Final Failure:’ John F. Kennedy and the Secret Cuban Missile Crisis Meetings (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Stevens, David, “Dangerous Precedents: Emulation and Norm Violation in Foreign Policy Decision-Making,” unpublished paper, Columbia University, April 30, 2004.
Stigler, George and Becker, Gary, “De Gustibus Non est Disputandum,” American Economic Review, vol. 67 (1977), pp. 76–90.Google Scholar
Stimson, Henry, “The Decision to Use the Bomb,” Harper's, vol. 194, no. 1161 (February 1947), pp. 97–107.Google Scholar
Stromseth, Jane, The Origins of Flexible Response: NATO's Debate Over Strategy in the 1960s (New York: St. Martin's, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, Robert A., Working in the World: Jimmy Carter and the Making of American Foreign Policy (Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University, 2000).Google Scholar
Stueck, William, The Korean War: An International History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert, “The Role of Inductive Reasoning in the Evolution of Conventions,” Law and Philosophy, vol. 17, no. 4 (1998), pp. 377–410.Google Scholar
Szulc, Tad, The Illusion of Peace: Foreign Policy in the Nixon Years (New York: Viking Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Takaki, Ronald, Why America Dropped the Bomb (New York: Little, Brown & Co., 1995).Google Scholar
Talbott, Strobe, Master of the Game: Paul Nitze and the Nuclear Peace (New York: Knopf, 1988).Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina, “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use,” International Organization, vol. 53, no. 3 (Summer 1999), pp. 433–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenwald, NinaKeeping Weapons from Terrorists: The Urgent Need for Arms Control,” Brown Journal of World Affairs, vol. 8, no. 2 (Winter 2001), pp. 27–36.Google Scholar
“Targeting Ho Chi Minh Trail,” at www.nautilus.org/VietnamFOIA/background/HoChiMinhTrail.html.
Taylor, Richard, Against the Bomb: The British Peace Movement, 1958–1965 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Taylor, Richard, and Pritchard, Charles, The Protest-Makers (London: Pergamon, 1982).Google Scholar
Terriff, Terry, The Nixon Administration and the Making of U. S. Nuclear Strategy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh, “Stepping Stones to a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World,” in Thakur, Ramesh, ed., Nuclear Weapons-Free Zones (New York: St. Martin's, 1998), pp. 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Ward, Ethics of Destruction: Norms and Force in International Relations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Thomas, William I., and Swaine Thomas, Dorothy, The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs (New York: A. A. Knopf, 1928).Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc, “A ‘Wasting Asset’: American Strategy and the Shifting Nuclear Balance, 1949–1954,” International Security, vol. 13, no. 3 (Winter 1988/89), pp. 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc “The Berlin Crisis,” in Trachtenberg, , History and Strategy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991), pp. 169–234.Google Scholar
Tucker, Jonathan B., Brad Roberts, and Elisa Harris, “Chemical and Biological Weapons,” in Cirincione, Joseph, ed., Repairing the Regime: Preventing the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction (New York: Routledge, 2000), pp. 217–32.Google Scholar
Tucker, Jonathan B., Brad Roberts, and Elisa Harris “The Nuclear Future: Political and Social Considerations,” CNSS Papers, No. 11 (Center for National Security Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, June 1988).
Tucker, Robert, and Hendrickson, David, The Imperial Temptation: The New World Order and America's Purpose (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1992).Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert C., Knorr, Klaus, Richard, A. Falk, and Bull, Hedley, Proposal for No First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Pros and Cons, Center of International Studies, Policy Memo No. 28 (Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson School, 1963).Google Scholar
Turner, Stansfield, Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Weapons (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Ullman, Richard H., “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 50, no. 4 (July 1972), pp. 669–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman-Margalit, Edna, The Emergence of Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Union of Concerned Scientists, No First Use (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1983).
United Nations, The United Nations and Disarmament, 1945–1970 (New York: United Nations, 1970).
United NationsThe United Nations and Nuclear Non-Proliferation (New York: United Nations, 1995).
US News and World Report, Triumph Without Victory: The Unreported History of the Persian Gulf War (NY: Times Books/Random House, 1992).
Courtland Moon, John Ellis, “Chemical Weapons and Deterrence: The WWII Experience,” International Security, vol. 8, no. 4 (Spring 1984), pp. 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crevald, Martin, Technology and War: From 2000 B. C. to the Present (New York: Free Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Crevald, MartinNuclear Proliferation and the Future of Conflict (New York: Free Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Voorst, Bruce J., “The Churches and Nuclear Deterrence,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 61, no. 4 (Spring 1983), pp. 827–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitzthum, Wolfgang Graf, “The World Nuclear Order and the Equality of States,” Law and State, vol. 25 (1982), pp. 23–50.Google Scholar
Wright, G. H., Explanation and Understanding (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Walker, J. Samuel, “The Decision to Use the Bomb: A Historiographical Update,” Diplomatic History, vol. 14, no. 1 (Winter 1990), pp. 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J. SamuelPrompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Walker, William, “Nuclear Order and Disorder,” International Affairs, vol. 76, no. 4 (2000), pp. 703–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, Douglas C., Congress and the Nuclear Freeze: An Inside Look at the Politics of a Mass Movement (Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, 1987).Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979).Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N.The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Be Better, Adelphi Paper No. 171 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1981).Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N.Kenneth, N. Waltz and Scott, D. Sagan, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed, (New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 2003).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (New York: Basic Books, 1992), 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael “Justice and Injustice in the Gulf War,” in Decosse, David E., ed., But Was It Just? Reflections on the Morality of the Persian Gulf War (New York: Doubleday, 1992), pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, and Fussell, Paul, “An Exchange on Hiroshima,” The New Republic, September 23, 1981, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
Ware, Alyn, “The World Court and Nuclear Weapons: Who Is Listening?” UN Chronicle, vol. 36, no. 4 (1999).Google Scholar
Ware, Alyn “NGO and Government Cooperation in Setting the Disarmament Agenda: The Impact of the 1996 International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion,” in Rutherford, Kenneth, Brem, Stefen, and Matthew, Richard A., eds., Reframing the Agenda: The Impact of NGO and Middle Power Cooperation in International Security (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003), pp. 113–42.Google Scholar
Warnke, Paul, “Now More than Ever: No First Use,” in Kegley, Charles W. and Schwab, Kenneth L., eds., After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991), pp. 55–65.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Sherri L., The Neutron Bomb Controversy: A Study in Alliance Politics (New York: Praeger, 1983).Google Scholar
Weathersby, Kathryn, ed. and trans., “New Russian Documents on the Korean War,” Cold War International History Project Bulletin, no. 6–7 (Winter 1995/96).Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E., The Social Psychology of Organizing (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969).Google Scholar
Weiler, Lawrence, “The Evolution of the Concept of No First Use,” unpublished manuscript, NYC Conference: Council for a Livable World, October 24, 1982.
Weinberg, Alvin, “The Sanctification of Hiroshima,” Oak Ridge Associated Universities, November 1995.
Weinberg, Alvin “The Bell and the Bomb,” Cosmos Journal (1997), at www.cosmos-club.org/journals/1997/index.html.
Weingast, Barry, “A Rational Choice Perspective on the Role of Ideas: Shared Belief Systems and State Sovereignty in International Cooperation,” Politics and Society, vol. 12 (December 1995), pp. 449–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, David, Justice and the Genesis of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Andreas, Living With Peril: Eisenhower, Kennedy and Nuclear Weapons (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997).Google Scholar
Westing, Arthur, ed., Cultural Norms, War and the Environment, SIPRI (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Wheeler, John Archibald, with Ford, Kenneth, Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam: A Life in Physics (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1998).Google Scholar
White, Theodore H., The Making of the President 1964 (New York: Athenaeum Publishers, 1965).Google Scholar
Whiting, Alan, China Cross the Yalu (New York: Macmillan, 1960).Google Scholar
Williamson, Samuel R., and Reardon, Steven L., The Origins of U. S. Nuclear Strategy, 1945–1953 (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willrich, Mason, “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons: An Assessment,” Orbis, vol. 9, no. 2 (Summer 1965), pp. 299–315.Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence S., Rebels Against War: The American Peace Movement 1933–1983 (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1984), rev. edn.Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence S.One World or None: A History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement Through 1953, vol. I of The Struggle Against the Bomb (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993).
Wittner, Lawrence S.Resisting the Bomb: A History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement, 1954–1970, vol. II of The Struggle Against the Bomb (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence S.Toward Nuclear Abolition: A History of the World Disarmament Movement, 1971 to the Present, vol. III of The Struggle Against the Bomb (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Wright, David, “The Spratt-Furse Law on Mini-Nuke Development,” Backgrounder, Union of Concerned Scientists, May 11, 2003.
Yaffe, Michael, “Nuclear Weapons and U. S. Army Organization,” manuscript (September 1990).
Yee, Albert, “Thick Rationality and the Missing ‘Brute Fact’: The Limits of Rationalist Incorporation of Norms and Ideas,” Journal of Politics, vol. 59, no. 4 (November 1997), pp. 1001–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yost, David S., “The Delegitimization of Nuclear Deterrence?” Armed Forces and Society, vol. 16, no. 4 (Summer 1990), pp. 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Jing-Dong, “Chinese Responses to U. S. Missile Defenses: Implications for Arms Control and Regional Security,” Nonproliferation Review, vol. 10 (Spring 2003), pp. 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaborsky, Victor, “Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation: The Evolution of the Ukrainian Case,” CSIA Discussion Paper 94–05, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, June 1994.
Zhara, Farah, “Pakistan's Road to a Minimum Nuclear Deterrent,” Arms Control Today, vol. 29, no. 5 (July/August 1999), pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
Zook, Darren C., “A Culture of Deterrence: Nuclear Myths and Cultural Chauvinism in South Asia,” World Policy Journal, vol. 17, no. 1 (Spring 2000), pp. 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubok, Vladislav M., and Hope M. Harrison, “The Nuclear Education of Nikita Khrushschev,” in Lewis Gaddis, Johnet al., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb: Nuclear Diplomacy Since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 141–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annual Report to the President and the Congress (Washington, DC: Office of the Secretary of Defense, January 1994).
Ball, George, “How Valid Are the Assumptions Underlying our Vietnam Policies?” memo, October 5, 1964, reprinted in The Atlantic Monthly, 1972, pp. 41–42.
Barrett, David M., ed., Lyndon B. Johnson's Vietnam Papers (College Station: Texas A & M University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Keany, Thomas A., and Elliot, A. Cohen, Gulf War Air Power Survey (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Pentagon Papers: The Defense Department History of United States Decisionmaking on Vietnam, vol. III (Boston: Beacon Press, 1971), Senator Gravel edition.
Public Papers of the President: Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1955 (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1956).
Public Papers of the President: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1963–64, vol. I (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1965).
Public Papers of the Presidents: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1968–69, vol. I (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1970).
Public Papers of the Presidents: Harry S. Truman, 1950 (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1965).
Public Papers of the Presidents: Harry S. Truman, 1953 (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1965).
US Department of Defense, Conduct of the Persian Gulf War: Final Report, 3 vols. (Washington, DC: US GPO, 1992).
US Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1945, Conference at Quebec, September 18, 1944 (Washington, DC: 1972).
US Department of State1945, vol. 2, General: Political and Economic Matters (Washington, DC: GPO, 1967).
US Department of State1948, vol. 1, General (Washington, DC: GPO, 1975).
US Department of State1950, vol. 1, National Security Affairs; Foreign and Economic Policy (Washington DC: GPO, 1977).
US Department of State1950, vol. 7, Korea (Washington, DC: GPO, 1976).
US Department of State1951, vol. 7, Korea and China (Washington, DC: GPO, 1983)
US Department of State1952–54, vol. 1, General and Political Matters (Washington, DC: GPO, 1984).
US Department of State1952–54, vol. 2, National Security Affairs, parts 1 and 2 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1984).
US Department of State1952–54, vol. 14, China and Japan, parts 1 and 2 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1985).
US Department of State1952–54, vol. 15, Korea, parts 1 and 2 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1984).
US Department of State1955–57, vol. 19, National Security Policy (Washington, DC: GPO, 1990).
US Department of State1955–57, vol. 20, Regulation of Armaments and Atomic Energy (Washington, DC: GPO, 1990).
US Department of State1961–63, vol. 7, Arms Control and Disarmament (Washington, DC: GPO, 1995).
US Department of State1961–63, vol. 19, South Asia (Washington, DC: GPO, 1996).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 1, Vietnam, 1964 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1992).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 2, Vietnam, January–June 1965 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1996).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 3, Vietnam, June–December 1965 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1996).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 4, Vietnam 1966 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1998).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 5, Vietnam 1967 (Washington, DC: GPO, 2002).
US Department of State1964–68, vol. 11, Arms Control and Disarmament (Washington, DC: GPO, 1997).
US Department of State, The Washington Summit: General Secretary Brezhnev's Visit to the United States, June 18–25, 1973, Publication 8733 (Washington, DC: GPO, 1973).
US Strategic Bombing Survey, The Effects of the Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Chairman's Office, 30 June 1946 (Washington, DC: US GPO).
Acheson, Dean, Present at the Creation: My Years at the State Department (New York: Norton, 1969).Google Scholar
Acheson, DeanThe Korean War (New York: Norton, 1971).Google Scholar
Anders, Roger, ed., Forging the Atomic Shield: Excerpts from the Office Diary of Gordon E. Dean (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Baker, James A. III, with DeFrank, Thomas M., The Politics of Diplomacy: Revolution, War and Peace, 1989–1992 (New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1995).Google Scholar
Ball, George, The Past Has Another Pattern: Memoirs (New York: Norton, 1982).Google Scholar
Blum, John Morton, ed., The Price of Vision: The Diary of Henry A. Wallace, 1942–1946 (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1973).Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Zbigniew, Power and Principle: Memoirs of the National Security Advisor, 1977–1981 (New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux, 1983).Google Scholar
Bush, George, and Scowcroft, Brent, A World Transformed (New York: Knopf, 1998).Google Scholar
Bush, Vannevar, Pieces of the Action (New York: William Morrow and Co., 1970).Google Scholar
Carter, Jimmy, Keeping Faith: Memoirs of a President (New York: Bantam, 1982).Google Scholar
Cohen, Samuel T., The Truth About the Neutron Bomb (New York: Morrow, 1983).Google Scholar
Collins, J. Lawton, War in Peacetime: The History and Lessons of Korea (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1969).Google Scholar
Compton, Arthur Holly, Atomic Quest (New York: Oxford University Press, 1956).Google Scholar
Eisenhower, Dwight D., Mandate for Change, 1953–56: The White House Years (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1963).Google Scholar
Ellsberg, Daniel, Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers (New York: Viking, 2002).Google Scholar
Gavin, James M. Lt. Gen., War and Peace in the Space Age (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1958).Google Scholar
Groves, Leslie, Now It Can Be Told: The Story of the Manhattan Project (New York: Harper, 1962).Google Scholar
Haig, Alexander M. Jr., Inner Circles: How America Changed the World: A Memoir (New York: Warner Books, 1992).Google Scholar
Haldeman, H. R., with DiMona, Joseph, The Ends of Power (New York: Times Books, 1978).Google Scholar
Haldeman, H. R., with DiMona, JosephThe Haldeman Diaries: Inside the Nixon White House (G. Putnam's Sons, 1994).Google Scholar
Johnson, Lyndon, The Vantage Point: Perspectives of the Presidency, 1963–1969 (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1984, 1971).Google Scholar
Joy, C. Turner, How Communists Negotiate (Santa Monica, CA: Fidelis Publications, 1955, 1970).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A., Years of Upheaval (Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1992).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A.The White House Years (Boston: Little, Brown, 1979).Google Scholar
Leahy, William D. Adm., I Was There (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950).Google Scholar
Lilienthal, David E., The Journals of David E. Lilienthal, vol. II (New York: Harper and Row, 1964).Google Scholar
McNamara, Robert, with Mark, Brian, In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam (New York: Times Books, 1995).Google Scholar
Nichols, K. D., The Road to Trinity (New York: William Morrow & Co., 1987).Google Scholar
Nitze, Paul H., with Smith, Ann M. and Rearden, Steven L., From Hiroshima to Glasnost: At the Center of a Decision: A Memoir (London: G. Weidenfeld, 1989).Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard M., No More Vietnams (New York: Arbor House, 1985).Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard M.RN: The Memoirs of Richard Nixon (New York: Grosset and Dunlap, 1978).Google Scholar
Powell, Colin, with Joseph, E. Persico, My American Journey (New York: Random House, 1995).Google Scholar
Rusk, Dean (as told to Richard Rusk), As I Saw It (New York: W. W. Norton, 1990).Google Scholar
Schwarzkopf, H. Norman, with Peter, Petre, It Doesn't Take a Hero (New York: Bantam, 1992).Google Scholar
Smith, Gerard, Disarming Diplomat: The Memoirs of Gerard Smith, Arms Control Negotiator (Lanham, MD: Madison Books, 1996).Google Scholar
Taylor, Maxwell, Swords and Plowshares (New York: Norton, 1972).Google Scholar
Truman, Harry S., Memoirs: Year of Decisions, vol. I (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1955).Google Scholar
Truman, Harry S.Off the Record: The Private Papers of Harry S. Truman, Robert H. Ferrell, ed. (New York: Harper and Row, 1980).Google Scholar
Twining, Nathan, Neither Liberty Nor Safety (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1966).Google Scholar
Vance, Cyrus R., Hard Choices: Four Critical Years in America's Foreign Policy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983).Google Scholar
Westmoreland, William C., A Soldier Reports (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1976).Google Scholar
York, Herbert, Making Weapons, Talking Peace (New York: Basic Books, 1987).Google Scholar
Aachen, Christopher, and Snidal, Duncan, “Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies,” World Politics, vol. 41, no. 2 (January 1989), pp. 143–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Gary, and Jeffrey M. Bale, “Al Qa'ida and Weapons of Mass Destruction,” at cns.miis.edu/pubs/other/alqwmd.htm.
Ackland, Len, “Gulf Macho,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 47, no. 1 (January/February 1991), p. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adelman, Kenneth L., The Great Universal Embrace: Arms Summitry – A Skeptic's Account (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989).Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism and World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations, vol. 3, no. 3 (September 1997), pp. 319–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel “Cognitive Evolution: A Dynamic Approach for the Study of International Relations and Their Progress,” in Adler, Emanuel and Crawford, Beverly, eds., Progress in Postwar International Relations (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Agnew, Harold, “A Plan to Lessen Suspicions,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 33, no. 3 (November/December 1997), p. 7.Google Scholar
Albright, David, “South Africa and the Affordable Bomb,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 50, no. 4 (July/August 1994), pp. 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albright, David, and O'Neill, Kevin, “Non-Proliferation: Jury-Rigged but Working,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 1 (January/February 1995), pp. 22–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Thomas, War Games (New York: McGraw Hill, 1987).Google Scholar
Allison, Graham, Nuclear Terrorism: The Ultimate Preventable Catastrophe (New York: Times Books, 2004).Google Scholar
Alperovitz, Gar, Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam: The Use of the Atomic Bomb and the American Confrontation with Soviet Power (London: Pluto, 1994), 2nd expanded edn.Google Scholar
Alperovitz, Gar, and Robert, L. Messer, Barton, Bernstein, “Marshall, Truman, and the Decision to Drop the Bomb,” correspondence in International Security, vol. 16, no. 3 (Winter 1991/92), pp. 204–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, Stephen, Nixon: The Triumph of a Politician: 1962–1972 (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989).Google Scholar
“An American Legacy: Building a Nuclear Weapon Free World,” Final Report, Project on Eliminating Weapons of Mass Destruction (Washington, DC: Henry L. Stimson Center, 1997).
Anders, Roger, ed., Forging the Atomic Shield: Excerpts from the Office Diary of Gordon E. Dean (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Aquino, Michael A., “ The Neutron Bomb,” Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1980.Google Scholar
Arbatov, Alexei, “Russian Military Doctrine and Nuclear Forces to the Year 2000 and Beyond,” paper presented at the Conference on Russian Defense Policy Towards the Year 2000, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, March 26–27, 1997.
Arbman, Gunnar, and Charles Thornton, “Russia's Tactical Nuclear Weapons: Part I, Background and Policy Issues,” Swedish Defense Research Agency, FOI-R-1057-SE (November 2003), at www.cissm.umd.edu/documents/thorntonrussia.pdf.
Arkin, William M., “Flying Solo,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 54, no. 6 (November/December 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkin, William M.Calculated Ambiguity: Nuclear Weapons and the Gulf War,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 4 (1996), pp. 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkin, William M.Inarticulating Nuclear Policy,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 1 (January/February 1995), p. 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkin, William M.U. S. Nukes in the Gulf,” The Nation, vol. 251, no. 23 (December 31, 1990), pp. 834–36.Google Scholar
Arkin, William, Handler, Joshua, and Durrant, Damian, U. S. Nuclear Weapons in the Persian Gulf Crisis (Washington, DC: Greenpeace, January 1991).Google Scholar
Art, Robert, “The United States, Nuclear Weapons and Grand Strategy,” in Karp, Regina Cowan, ed., Security With Nuclear Weapons? Different Perspectives on National Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 57–99.Google Scholar
Asada, Sadao, “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan's Decision to Surrender – a Reconsideration,” Pacific Historical Review, vol. 67, no. 4 (November 1998), pp. 477–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ascherio, Alberto, et al., “The Effects of the Gulf War on Infant and Child Mortality in Iraq,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 327, no. 13 (1992), pp. 931–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Rick, Crusade: The Untold Story of the Persian Gulf War (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1993).Google Scholar
Atwood, David C., “Mobilizing Around the United Nations Special Sessions on Disarmament,” in Smith, Jackie, Chatfield, Charles, and Pugnucco, Ron, eds., Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1997), 141–58.Google Scholar
Auger, Vincent A., The Dynamics of Foreign Policy Analysis: The Carter Administration and the Neutron Bomb (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996).Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, “The Evolutionary Creation of Norms,” American Political Science Review, vol. 80, no. 4 (December 1986), pp. 1095–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayewah, Isaac E., “The Treaty on the Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone in Africa (The Pelindaba Treaty),” in Alves, Pericles Gasparini and Cipollone, Daiana Belinda, eds., Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones in the 21st Century (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1997), 55–58.Google Scholar
Baaro, Makurita, “The South Pacific Nuclear-Free Zone Treaty,” in Alves, Pericles Gasparini and Cipollone, Daiana Belinda, eds., Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones in the 21st Century (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1997), 49–54.Google Scholar
Ball, George, “The Cosmic Bluff,” New York Review of Books, July 1983, pp. 37–38.Google Scholar
Barkun, Michael, Law Without Sanctions: Order in Primitive Societies and the World Community (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Barnaby, Frank, How Nuclear Weapons Spread: Nuclear Weapons Proliferation in the 1990s (London: Routledge, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, John, “The Nuclear Option: Thinking the Unthinkable,” Newsweek, January 14, 1991, p. 17.Google Scholar
Bennett, Gordon C., The New Abolitionists: The Story of Nuclear Free Zones (Elgin, IL: Brethen, 1987).Google Scholar
Berger, Peter, and Luckmann, Thomas, The Social Construction of Reality (New York: Anchor Books, 1967).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J., “A Postwar Myth: 500,000 U. S. Lives Saved,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 42, no. 4 (June/July 1986), pp. 38–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Ike and Hiroshima: Did He Oppose It?” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 10 (September 1987), pp. 377–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Eclipsed by Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Early Thinking About Tactical Nuclear Weapons,” International Security, vol. 15, no. 4 (Spring 1991), pp. 149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.The Atomic Bombings Reconsidered,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 74, no. 1 (January 1995), pp. 135–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Compelling Japan's Surrender Without the A-bomb, Soviet Entry or Invasion: Reconsidering the U. S. Bombing Survey's Early Surrender Conclusions,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 18, no. 2 (1995), pp. 54–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Understanding the Atomic Bomb and the Japanese Surrender: Missed Opportunities, Little-Known Near Disasters, and Modern Memory,” Diplomatic History, vol. 19, no. 2 (Spring 1995), pp. 227–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J. “Doing Nuclear History: Treating Scholarship Fairly and Interpreting Pre-Hiroshima Thinking About ‘Radioactive Poisoning’,” Newsletter – Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations, September 1996, pp. 17–43.
Bernstein, Barton J.Truman and the A-Bomb: Targeting Noncombatants, Using the Bomb, and His Defending the ‘Decision’,” Journal of Military History, vol. 62 (July 1998), pp. 547–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Barton J.Reconsidering Truman's Claim of ‘Half A Million Lives Saved’ by the Atomic Bomb: The Construction and Deconstruction of a Myth,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 22, no. 1 (1999), pp. 101–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betts, Richard K., Nuclear Blackmail and Nuclear Balance (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1987).Google Scholar
Biddle, Steve D., and Feaver, Peter D., eds., Battlefield Nuclear Weapons: Issues and Options, Occasional Paper No. 5 (Cambridge, MA: Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, 1989).Google Scholar
Biersteker, Thomas J., and Weber, Cynthia, eds., State Sovereignty as Social Contract (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Bilmes, Jack, Discourse and Behavior (New York: Plenum Press, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Kai, The Color of Truth: McGeorge Bundy and William Bundy, Brothers in Arms (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1998).Google Scholar
Blackaby, Frank, Goldblat, Jozef, and Lodgaard, Sverre, eds., No First Use, SIPRI (London: Taylor and Francis, 1984).Google Scholar
Blacker, Coit, and Duffy, Gloria, International Arms Control: Issues and Agreements (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Blight, James G., ed., Missed Opportunities? Revisiting the Decisions of the Vietnam War, 1945–68, Hanoi Conference, June 20–23, 1997. Transcript, Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, 1998.Google Scholar
Blight, James G.The Shattered Crystal Ball: Fear and Learning in the Cuban Missile Crisis (Savage, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1990).Google Scholar
Bowie, Robert R., and Immerman, Richard H., Waging Peace: How Eisenhower Shaped an Enduring Cold War Strategy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Boyer, Paul, By the Bomb's Early Light: American Thought and Culture at the Dawn of the Atomic Age (New York: Pantheon Books, 1985).Google Scholar
Boyer, PaulFallout: A Historian Reflects on America's Half-Century Encounter with Nuclear Weapons (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
“Briefing Book on Tactical Nuclear Weapons” (January 2003) at www.armscontrolcenter.org/prolifproject/tnw/index.html.
Brands, H. W. Jr., “Testing Massive Retaliation: Credibility and Crisis Management in the Taiwan Strait,” International Security, vol. 12, no. 4 (Spring 1988), pp. 121–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, Bernard, War and Politics (New York: Macmillan, 1973).Google Scholar
Brodie, Bernard, ed., The Absolute Weapon:Atomic Power and World Order (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1946).Google Scholar
Broscious, David, “Longing for International Control, Banking on American Superiority: Harry S. Truman's Approach to Nuclear Weapons,” in Gaddis, John Lewiset al., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb: Nuclear Diplomacy Since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhite, Russell D., and Hamel, Christopher W., “War for Peace: The Question of an American Preventive War Against the Soviet Union, 1945–1955,” Diplomatic History, vol. 14, no. 3 (1990), pp. 367–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Builder, Carl H., and Graubard, Morlie H., The International Law of Armed Conflict: Implications for the Concept of Assured Destruction (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1982).Google Scholar
Bundy, McGeorge, Danger and Survival: Decisions About the Bomb in the First Fifty Years (New York: Random House, 1988).Google Scholar
Bundy, McGeorgeNuclear Weapons and the Gulf,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 70, no. 4 (Fall 1991), pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
Bundy, McGeorge, McNamara, Robert S., Smith, Gerard, and Kennan, George, “Nuclear Weapons and the Atlantic Alliance,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 60, no. 4 (Spring 1982), pp. 753–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundy, William, A Tangled Web: The Making of Foreign Policy in the Nixon Presidency (New York: Hill and Wang, 1998).Google Scholar
Bunn, George, Arms Control By Committee: Managing Negotiations with the Russians (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Bunn, George “Evolution of the Issue of No First Use of Nuclear Weapons,” unpublished manuscript (April 1982).
Bunn, GeorgeUS Law of Nuclear Weapons,” Naval War College Review, vol. 32, no. 4 (July/August 1984), pp. 46–62.Google Scholar
Bunn, George “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Codifying Nuclear Deterrence?” Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Pugwash Symposium on the Arms Race and International Law (1983).
Burnham, James, The Struggle for the World (New York: The John Day Co., 1947).Google Scholar
Burr, William, “U.S Nuclear History: Nuclear Arms and Politics in the Missile Age 1955–1968,” Digital National Security Archive at http://nsarchive.chadwyck.com/collections/nh_essay.jsp
Burr, William, “The Nixon Administration, the ‘Horror Strategy,’ and the Search for Limited Nuclear Options, 1969–1972,” Journal of Cold War Studies, vol. 7, no. 3 (Summer 2005), pp. 34–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burr, William, and Kimball, Jeffrey, “Nixon's Secret Nuclear Alert: Vietnam War Diplomacy and the Joint Chiefs of Staff Readiness Test, October 1969,” Cold War History, vol. 3, no. 2 (January 2003), pp. 113–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Richard, “Defense and Arms Control: Defining the Problem,” in Bernard, F. Halloran, ed., Essays on Arms Control and National Security (US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Washington, DC, 1986), pp. 187–210.Google Scholar
Byrne, Paul, The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (London: Croom Helm, 1988).Google Scholar
Campbell, David, Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics and the Narratives of the Gulf War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1993).Google Scholar
Cancian, Francesca, What Are Norms? A Study of Beliefs and Action in a Maya Community (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Carnesale, Albert, et al., Living With Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Carter, April, Peace Movements: International Protests and World Politics Since 1945 (London: Longman, 1992).Google Scholar
Catudal, Honore M., Soviet Strategy from Stalin to Gorbachev (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities, 1989).Google Scholar
Cerniello, Craig, “Clinton Issues New Guidelines on U. S. Nuclear Weapons Doctrine,” Arms Control Today, vol. 27, no. 8 (November/December 1997), p. 23.Google Scholar
“The Challenge of Peace: God's Promise and Our Response,” A Pastoral Letter on War and Peace, May 3, 1983, National Conference of Catholic Bishops (Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference, 1983).
Chang, Gordon H., “To the Brink: Eisenhower, Dulles and the Quemoy–Matsu Crisis,” International Security, vol. 12, no. 4 (Spring 1988), pp. 96–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauvistre, Eric, The Implications of IAEA Inspections under Security Council Resolution 687 (New York: United Nations, 1992).Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, “An Inquiry into the Workings of Arms Control Agreements,” Harvard Law Review, vol. 85, no. 5 (March 1972), pp. 905–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Antonia Handler, and Abram Chayes, “Nonproliferation Regimes in the Aftermath of the Gulf War,” in Nye, Joseph and Smith, Roger, eds., After the Storm: Lessons from the Gulf War, The Aspen Institute (Lanham, MD: Madison Books, 1992), pp. 49–80.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T., “Norms, Institutions and National Identity in Contemporary Europe,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 43 (1999), pp. 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
China's Nuclear Policy, the Nuclear Threat Initiative, at www.nti.org/db/china/index/html.
Cillessen, Bret J., “Embracing the Bomb: Ethics, Morality and Nuclear Deterrence in the US Air Force, 1945–55,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 21, no. 1 (March 1998), pp. 96–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirincione, Joseph, ed., Repairing the Regime: Preventing the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction (New York: Routledge, 2000).Google Scholar
Claude, Inis L. Jr., “Collective Legitimization as a Political Function of the United Nations,” International Organization, vol. 20, no. 3 (Summer 1966), pp. 367–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, Peter, Nonproliferation and the National Interest: America's Response to the Spread of Nuclear Weapons (New York: HarperCollins, 1993).Google Scholar
Clodfelter, Mark, The Limits of Air Power: The American Bombing of Vietnam (New York: Free Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Cohen, Avner, Israel and the Bomb (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Cohen, Avner “Israel and the Nuclear Taboo,” unpublished paper, University of Maryland, 1999.
Cohen, Roger, and Gatti, Claudio, In the Eye of the Storm: The Life of General H. Norman Schwarzkopf (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1991).Google Scholar
Cohen, Sheldon, Arms and Judgement: Law, Morality and the Conduct of War in the 20th Century (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Cole, Leonard A., The Eleventh Plague: The Politics of Biological and Chemical Warfare (New York: W. H. Freeman, 1997).Google Scholar
Collina, Tom Zamora, “South Africa Bridges the Gap,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 5 (July/August 1995), pp. 27–31.Google Scholar
Cordesman, Anthony H., “Radiological Weapons as a Means of Attack,” November 30, 2001, at www.csis.org/burke/hd/reports/ radiological.pdf.
Cortwright, David, Peace Works: The Citizen's Role in Ending the Cold War (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1993).Google Scholar
Cousins, Norman, “The Literacy of Survival,” The Saturday Review, September 14, 1946, p. 14.Google Scholar
Craig, Campbell, Destroying the Village: Eisenhower and Thermonuclear War (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Crane, Conrad C., “To Avert Impending Disaster: American Military Plans to Use Atomic Weapons During the Korean War,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 23, no. 2 (June 2000), pp. 72–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daalder, Ivo H., The Nature and Practice of Flexible Response (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
D'Amato, Anthony, The Concept of Custom in International Law (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Boer, Connie, “The Polls: Our Commitment to WWIII,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 1 (Spring 1981), pp. 126–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boer, ConnieThe Polls: The European Peace Movement and the Deployment of Nuclear Missiles,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 1 (Spring 1985), pp. 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Jonathan, and Laurenti, Jeffrey, Options and Opportunities: Arms Control and Disarmament for the 21st Century (New York: United Nations Association, 1997).Google Scholar
Decosse, David E., ed., But Was it Just? Reflections on the Morality of the Persian Gulf War (New York: Doubleday, 1992).Google Scholar
Deery, Phillip, “The Dove Flies East: Whitehall, Warsaw, and the 1950 World Peace Congress,” Australian Journal of Politics and History, vol. 48, no. 2 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewes, Kate, and Green, Robert, “The World Court Project: History and Consequences,” Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, vol. 7, no. 1 (Fall 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhanapala, Jayantha with Rydell, Randy, Multilateral Diplomacy and the NPT: An Insider's Account (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 2005).Google Scholar
Diamond, Howard, “India Releases Nuclear Doctrine, Looks to Emulate P-5 Arsenals,” Arms Control Today, vol. 29, no. 5 (July/August 1999), p. 23.Google Scholar
Dingman, Roger, “Atomic Diplomacy During the Korean War,” International Security, vol. 13, no. 3 (Winter 1988/89), pp. 50–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divine, Robert, Blowing on the Wind: The Nuclear Test Ban Debate, 1954–1960 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Dockrill, Saki, Eisenhower's New-Look National Security Policy, 1953–61 (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary, Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo (London: Routledge, 1966/95).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dower, John W., War Without Mercy: Race and Power in the Pacific War (New York: Pantheon Books, 1986).Google Scholar
Dowler, Thomas W., and Howard, Joseph S. II, “Countering the Threat of the Well-Armed Tyrant: A Modest Proposal for Small Nuclear Weapons,” Strategic Review, vol. 19, no. 4 (Fall 1991), pp. 34–40.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael, “Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 12, no. 3 (1983), pp. 205–35.Google Scholar
Draper, Theodore, “How Not to Think About Nuclear War,” New York Review of Books, vol. 29, July 15, 1982.Google Scholar
Drell, Sidney, Goodby, James, Jeanloz, Raymond, and Peurifoy, Robert, “A Strategic Choice: New Bunker Busters Versus Nonproliferation,” Arms Control Today, vol. 33, no. 2 (March 2003), p. 8.Google Scholar
Dulles, John Foster, “Challenge and Response in United States Policy,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 36, no. 1 (October 1957), pp. 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Lewis A., “Global Nuclear Order in an Era of Proliferation,” in Gottemueller, Rose, ed., Strategic Arms Control in the Post-START Era, IISS (London: Brassey's, 1992).Google Scholar
Dunnigan, James F., and Bay, Austin, From Shield to Storm: High-Tech Weapons, Military Strategy and Coalition Warfare in the Persian Gulf (New York: William Morrow & Co., 1992).Google Scholar
Dyson, Freeman, Disturbing the Universe (New York: Basic Books, 1979).Google Scholar
Eden, Lynn, Constructing Destruction: Organizations, Knowledge, and the Effects of Nuclear Weapons (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Ederington, L. Benjamin, , and Mazarr, Michael J., eds., Turning Point: The Gulf War and U. S. Military Strategy (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, JonSocial Norms and Economic Theory,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 3, no. 4 (Fall 1989), pp. 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enthoven, Alain C., “1963 Nuclear Strategy Revisited,” in Henry, P. Ford and Francis, X. Winters, , S. J., eds., Ethics and Nuclear Strategy? (Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 1977), pp. 72–81.Google Scholar
Epstein, William, “NPT Wrap-Up: Indefinite Extension – With Increased Accountability,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 4 (July/August 1995), pp. 27–30.Google Scholar
Epstein, William “Tlatelolco and a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World,” in Pericles Alves, Gasparini and Cipollone, Daiana Belinda, eds., Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones in the 21st Century (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1997), pp. 23–27.Google Scholar
Erdmann, Andrew P. N., “War No Longer Has Any Logic Whatever: Dwight D. Eisenhower and the Thermonuclear Revolution,” in Gaddis, John Lewiset al., eds., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 87–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, Hazel Gaudet, “The Polls: Atomic Weapons and Nuclear Energy,” Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 27 (1963), pp. 155–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew, Innovation and the Arms Race: How the United States and the Soviet Union Develop New Military Technologies (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Evangelista, MatthewUnarmed Forces: The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, “The Special Challenge of Our Times: Cultural Norms Related to Nuclearism,” in Westing, Arthur, ed., Cultural Norms, War and the Environment, SIPRI (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 53–63.Google Scholar
Falk, RichardNuclear Weapons, International Law and the World Court: A Historic Encounter,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 91, no. 64 (1997), pp. 64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Richard, Meyrowitz, Elliot, and Sanderson, Jack, Legal Order in a Violent World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, Elliot Meyrowitz, and Jack SandersonNuclear Weapons and International Law, Occasional Paper No. 10 (Center of International Studies, Princeton University, 1981).
Farley, Philip, “Strategic Arms Control, 1967–87,” in George, Alexanderet al., eds., U. S.–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 215–53.Google Scholar
Farrell, Theo and Helene, Lambert, “Courting Controversy: International Law, National Norms and American Nuclear Use,” Review of International Studies, vol. 27 (2001), pp. 309–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearey, Bryan L., White, Paul C., Ledger, John St., and Immele, John D., “An Analysis of Reduced Collateral Damage Nuclear Weapons,” Comparative Strategy, vol. 22, no. 4 (October/November 2003), pp. 304–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James, “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science,” World Politics, vol. 43 (January 1991), pp. 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federov, Yuri, “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Russia's Doctrine on Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Pugwash Conference, London, November 2002.
Feifer, George, Tennozan: The Battle for Okinawa and the Atomic Bomb (New York: Ticknor & Fields, 1992).Google Scholar
Feis, Herbert, Japan Subdued: The Atomic Bomb and the End of the Cold War in the Pacific (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961).Google Scholar
Findlay, Trevor, Nuclear Dynamite: The Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Fiasco (Sydney: Brassey's Australia, 1990).Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4 (1998), pp. 887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firmage, Edwin Brown, “The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 63, no. 4 (October 1969), pp. 729–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Catherine, Reformation and Resistance: Nongovernmental Organizations and the Future of Nuclear Weapons, Report No. 29 (Washington, DC: Henry L. Stimson Center, 1999).Google Scholar
FitzGerald, Frances, Way Out There in the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars, and the End of the Cold War (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000).Google Scholar
Florini, Ann, “The Evolution of International Norms,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 3 (September 1996), pp. 363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Rosemary, The Practice of Power: US Relations With China since 1949 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Foot, RosemaryThe Wrong War: American Policy and Dimensions of the Korean Conflict (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Foot, RosemaryNuclear Coercion and the Ending of the Korean Conflict,” International Security, vol. 13 (Winter 1988–89), pp. 92–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish (New York: Vintage, 1977).Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M., The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, Deterrence (Cambridge: Polity, 2004).Google Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy (New York: St. Martin's, 1989), 2nd edn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedman, Lawrence, and Karsh, Efraim, The Gulf Conflict, 1990–91 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Fried, John H. E., “First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Existing Prohibitions in International Law,” Bulletin of Peace Proposals, vol. 1 (1981).Google Scholar
Frye, Alton, “Slow Fuse on the Neutron Bomb,” Foreign Policy, no. 31 (Summer 1978), pp. 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Hisakaju, International Regulation of the Use of Nuclear Weapons (Osaka, Japan: Kansai University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Furguson, Charles D., and Potter, William C., The Four Faces of Nuclear Terrorism (Monterey: Monterey Institute, Center for Nonproliferation Studies, 2004).Google Scholar
Fursenko, Aleksandr, and Naftali, Timothy, One Hell of a Gamble: Khrushchev, Castro, and Kennedy, 1958–1964 (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997).Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis, “The Origins of Self-Deterrence: The United States and the Nonuse of Nuclear Weapons, 1945–1958,” in Gaddis, , The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 104–46.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis “The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in the Postwar International System,” in Gaddis, , The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 215–45.Google Scholar
Gaddis, John LewisWe Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Gaddis, John Lewis, Gordon, Philip H., May, Ernest R., and Rosenberg, Jonathan, eds., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb: Nuclear Diplomacy since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaiduk, Ilya, The Soviet Union and the Vietnam War (Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1996).Google Scholar
Gallicchio, Marc, “After Nagasaki: General Marshall's Plan for the Use of Tactical Nuclear Weapons,” Prologue: Quarterly of the National Archives, vol. 24, no. 4 (Winter 1991), pp. 396–404.Google Scholar
Ganapathy, Arumugam, “The Treaty on the South-East Asia Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone,” in Alves, Pericles Gasparini and Cipollone, Daiana Belinda, eds., Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones in the 21st Century (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, 1997), pp. 59–62.Google Scholar
Gardner, Gary T., Nuclear Non-Proliferation: A Primer (Boulder, CO: Lynn Rienner, 1994).Google Scholar
Garthoff, Raymond, Détente and Confrontation: American–Soviet Relations from Nixon to Reagan (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1994), rev. edn.Google Scholar
Gaskins, Richard H., Burdens of Proof in Modern Discourse (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Gehring, Verna, “The Nuclear Taboo,” Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, Summer 2000, at www.puaf.umd.edu/IPPP/Summer00/nuclear_taboo.htm.
Geiger, H. Jack, “Bomb Now, Die Later: The Consequences of Infrastructure Destruction for Iraqi Civilians in the Gulf War,” in O'Loughlin, John, Meyer, Tom, and Greenberg, Edward, eds., War and its Consequences: Lessons from the Persian Gulf Conflict (New York: HarperCollins, 1994).Google Scholar
Geller, Daniel S., “Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, and Crisis Escalation,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 34, no. 2 (June 1990), pp. 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentile, Gian P., “Advocacy or Assessment? The United States Strategic Bombing Survey of Germany and Japan,” Pacific Historical Review, vol. 66 (February 1997), pp. 53–79.Google Scholar
Girrier, Catherine, The No-First-Use Issue in American Nuclear Weapons Policy: 1945–1957 (Memoire de diplome, Institut Universitaire de Hautes Etudes Internationales, Geneva, 1985).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., “U. S.–Soviet Efforts to Cooperate in Crisis Management and Crisis Avoidance,” in Alexander, L. George, Farley, Philip, and Dallin, Alexander, eds., U. S.–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 581–99.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew, Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Richard, Smoke, Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice (New York: Columbia University Press, 1974).Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., Farley, Philip, and Dallin, Alexander, eds., US–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Germany Raises No-First-Use Issue at NATO Meeting,” Arms Control Today, vol. 28, no. 8 (November/December 1998), p. 24.
Gest, Howard, “The July 1945 Szilard Petition on the Atomic Bomb: Memoir by a Signer in Oak Ridge,” undated manuscript at www.bio.indiana.edu/Gest/HGSzilard.html.
Gittinger, Ted, ed., The Johnson Years: A Vietnam Roundtable (Austin, TX: Lyndon Baines Johnson Library: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs, 1993).Google Scholar
Gizewski, Peter, “From Winning Weapon to Destroyer of the World: The Nuclear Taboo in International Politics,” International Journal, vol. 51, no. 2 (Summer 1996), pp. 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Charles L., “The Flawed Case for Nuclear Disarmament,” Survival, vol. 40, no. 4 (Spring 1998), pp. 112–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Charles L., and Steve Fetter, , “National Missile Defense and the Future of U. S. Nuclear Weapons Policy,” International Security, vol. 26, no. 1 (Summer 2001), pp. 40–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasstone, Samuel, and Dolan, P. J., eds., Effects of Nuclear Weapons (Washington, DC: US Department of Defense and Energy Research and Development Administration, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Stanley, “What Did Truman Know, and When Did He Know It?” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 54, no. 3 (May/June 1998), pp. 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldblat, Jozef, “Issues Facing the 1995 NPT Extension Conference,” Security Dialogue, vol. 23, no. 4 (1992).Google Scholar
Goldblat, Jozef “Making Nuclear Weapons Illegal,” in Steinberger, Jack, Udgaonkar, Bhalchandra, and Rotblat, Joseph, eds., A Nuclear-Weapon-Free World (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993), pp. 153–68.Google Scholar
Goldblat, Jozef “Prospects for a Ban on the Use of Nuclear Weapons,” paper presented at the Third International Security Forum Zurich, Switzerland October 1998.
Gong, Gerrit, The Standard of Civilization in International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Gordon, Michael R., and Trainor, General Bernard E., The General's War: The Inside Story of the Conflict in the Gulf (Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co., 1995).Google Scholar
Gormley, Dennis M., and Mahnken, Thomas G., “Facing Nuclear and Conventional Reality,” Orbis, vol. 44, no. 1 (Winter 2000), pp. 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottemueller, Rose, ed., Strategic Arms Control in the Post-START Era, IISS (London: Brassey's, 1992).Google Scholar
Gottfried, Kurt, Kendall, Henry W. M, and Lee, John M., “‘No First Use’ of Nuclear Weapons,” Scientific American, vol. 250, no. 3 (March 1984), pp. 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Thomas W., American Public Opinion on NATO, Extended Deterrence, and the Use of Nuclear Weapons: Future Fission?, CSIA Occasional Paper No. 4 (Cambridge, MA: Center for Science and International Affairs, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, and University Press of America, 1989).Google Scholar
Graham, Thomas, “Strengthening Arms Control,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 2 (Spring 2000), pp. 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Colin S., Nuclear Strategy and National Style (Lanham, MD: Hamilton Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Gray, Colin S.An International ‘Norm’ Against Nuclear Weapons? The British Case,” Comparative Strategy, vol. 20 (2001), pp. 231–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenpeace, , Iraqi Deaths From the Gulf War as of December 1991 (Greenpeace, 1991).Google Scholar
Gusterson, Hugh, “Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination,” Cultural Anthropology, vol. 14, no. 1 (1999), pp. 111–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halperin, Morton H., “Proposal for a Ban on the Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Institute for Defense Analyses, Special Studies Group, Study Memorandum No. 4 (Washington, DC: IDA, 1961).
Halperin, Morton H., Limited War in the Nuclear Age (New York: Wiley, 1963).Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell, One for All: The Logic of Group Conflict (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Harwit, Martin, An Exhibit Denied: Lobbying the History of the Enola Gay (New York: Copernicus Books, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselkorn, Avigdor, The Continuing Storm: Iraq, Poisonous Weapons and Deterrence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Hashmi, Sohail H., and Lee, Steven P., eds., Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Religious and Secular Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Peter, Pacific Powderkeg: American Nuclear Dilemmas in Korea (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1991).Google Scholar
Hayes, Peter, and Tannenwald, Nina, “Nixing Nukes in Vietnam,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 59, no. 3 (May/June 2003), pp. 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidenrich, John G., “The Gulf War: How Many Iraqis Died?” Foreign Policy, no. 90 (Spring 1993), pp. 108–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herken, Gregg, The Winning Weapon: The Atomic Bomb in the Cold War (New York: Knopf, 1981).Google Scholar
Herken, GreggCounsels of War (New York: Knopf, 1985).Google Scholar
Herken, GreggCardinal Choices: Presidential Science Advising from the Atomic Bomb to SDI (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Herring, George, America's Longest War: The United States and Vietnam, 1950–1975 (New York: Wiley, 1996), 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Herron, Kerry G., and Jenkis-Smith, Hank C., Public Perspectives on Nuclear Security: U. S. National Security Surveys, 1993–1997 (Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Institute for Public Policy, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hersey, John, “Hiroshima,” New Yorker, August 31, 1946.Google Scholar
Hersh, Seymour M., The Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House (New York: Summit Books, 1983).Google Scholar
Hershberg, James G., James B. Conant: Harvard to Hiroshima and the Making of the Nuclear Age (New York: Knopf, 1993).Google Scholar
Hershberg, James G.A Footnote on Hiroshima and Atomic Morality: Conant, Niebuhr, and an ‘Emotional’ Clergyman, 1945–46,” Newsletter – Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations (December 2002).Google Scholar
Heuser, Beatrice, The Bomb: Nuclear Weapons in their Historic, Strategic and Ethical Context (London: Longmans, 2000).Google Scholar
Higuchi, Toshihiro, “Clean' Bombs: Nuclear Technology and Nuclear Strategy in the 1950s,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 29, no. 1 (February 2006), pp. 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Bruce, “Terrorists and WMD: Some Preliminary Hypotheses,” Nonproliferation Review, vol. 4, no. 3 (Spring–Summer 1997), pp. 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, Stanley, Duties Beyond Borders (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Hoodbhoy, Pervez, and Zia Mian, “The India–Pakistan conflict – Towards the Failure of Nuclear Deterrence,” Quaid-e-Azam University, Islamabad and Princeton University, September 2002, www.gakushuin.ac.jp/~881791/hoodbhoy/Deterrence.html.
Horner, Charles A., “Policy Consideration in Using Nuclear Weapons,” Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, vol. 8, no. 7 (1997), pp. 15–21.Google Scholar
Howard, Michael, Andreopoulos, George J., and Shulman, Mark R., eds., The Laws of War: Constraints on Warfare in the Western World (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel, “The Clash of Civilizations,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 72, no. 3 (Summer 1993), pp. 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikle, Fred Charles, “NATO's First Nuclear Use: A Deepening Trap?” Strategic Review, vol. 8 (Winter 1980), pp. 18–38.Google Scholar
Immerman, Richard, “Eisenhower and Dulles: Who Made the Decisions?” Political Psychology, vol. 1, no. 2 (1979), pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglis, D. R. and Sandler, C. L., “A Special Report on Plowshare: Problems and Prospects: The Non-military Use of Nuclear Explosives,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 23, no. 10 (1967), pp. 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Jason Division: Division Consultants Who Are Also Professors are Attacked,” Science, February 2, 1973, pp. 459–62, 505.
Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Jervis, RobertCooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics, vol. 30, no. 2 (January 1978), pp. 167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, RobertDeterrence Theory Revisited,” World Politics, vol. 31, no. 2 (January 1979), pp. 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, RobertThe Illogic of American Nuclear Strategy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Jervis, RobertThe Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Jervis, RobertThe Military History of the Cold War,” Diplomatic History, vol. 15, no. 1 (Winter 1991), pp. 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert, Lebow, Richard Ned, and Stein, Janice Gross, eds., Psychology and Deterrence (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Jian, Chen, “China's Involvement in the Vietnam War, 1964–69,” The China Quarterly, no. 142 (June 1995), pp. 356–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jochnick, Chris af, and Normand, Roger, “The Legitimation of Violence: A Critical History of the Laws of War,” Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 35, no. 49 (Winter 1994), pp. 49–95.Google Scholar
Joffe, Joseph, “Peace and Populism: Why the European Anti-nuclear Movement Failed,” International Security, vol. 11, no. 4 (Spring 1987), pp. 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, James Turner, Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Johnson, Rebecca, “NPT Report: The 2002 Prepcom: Papering Over the Cracks?” Disarmament Diplomacy, no. 64 (May/June 2002).Google Scholar
Kahn, Herman, “Nuclear Proliferation and Rules of Retaliation,” Yale Law Journal, vol. 76, no. 1 (November 1966), pp. 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, Herman, “Thinking About Nuclear Morality,” New York Times Magazine, June 13, 1982.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W., “Nuclear Weapons and the Rule of Law,” NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, vol. 31, no. 2 (Winter/Spring 1999), pp. 349–415.Google Scholar
Kaiser, David, American Tragedy: Kennedy, Johnson and the Origins of the Vietnam War (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Kalb, Marvin, and Kalb, Bernard, Kissinger (Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co., 1974).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Fred, “JFK's First Strike Plan,” vol. 288, no. 3, The Atlantic Monthly (October 2001), pp. 81–86.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Fred, The Wizards of Armageddon (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983).Google Scholar
Kapur, Ashok, “Non-Proliferation: Western Biases,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 1 (January/February 1995), pp. 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, Regina Cowan, ed., Security With Nuclear Weapons? Different Perspectives on National Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Katz, Milton S., Ban The Bomb: A History of SANE: the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy, 1957–1985 (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1986).Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, and Okawara, Nobuo, “Japan, Asian-Pacific Security and the Case for Analytical Eclectism,” International Security, vol. 26, no. 3 (Winter 2001/02), pp. 153–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, Alexander Wendt, and Ronald Jepperson, “Norms, Identity and Culture in National Security,” in Katzenstein, Peter, ed., The Culture of National Security (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), pp. 33–75.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, William W., “The Requirements of Deterrence,” in Kaufman, , ed., Military Policy and National Security (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1956), pp. 12–38.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, William W.The McNamara Strategy (New York: Harper & Row, 1964).Google Scholar
Keal, Paul, Unspoken Rules and Superpower Dominance (New York: St. Martin's, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret, and Sikkink, Kathryn, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kegley, Charles W. Jr. and Raymond, Gregory A., “Normative Constraints on the Use of Force Short of War,” Journal of Peace Research, vol. 23, no. 3 (September 1986), pp. 213–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kegley, Charles, and Schwab, Kenneth L., eds., After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Keller, Bill, “The Second Nuclear Age,” New York Times Magazine, May 4, 2003.Google Scholar
Keeley, James F., “Toward a Foucauldian Analysis of International Regimes,” International Organization, vol. 44, no. 1 (Winter 1989–90), pp. 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Khong, Yuen Foong, Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Kier, Elizabeth, and Mercer, Jonathan, “Setting Precedents in Anarchy: Military Intervention and Weapons of Mass Destruction,” International Security, vol. 20, no. 4 (Spring 1996), pp. 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, Jeffrey, Nixon's Vietnam War (Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 1998).Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert, and Verba, Sidney, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A., Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A.Diplomacy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994).Google Scholar
Klare, Michael T., “High-Death Weapons of the Gulf War,” The Nation, vol. 252, no. 21, June 3, 1991, pp. 721–42.Google Scholar
Kleidman, Robert, Organizing for Peace: Neutrality, the Test Ban, and the Freeze (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Klotz, Audie, “Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U. S. Sanctions against South Africa,” International Organization, vol. 49, no. 3 (Summer 1995), pp. 451–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knopf, Jeffrey W., Domestic Society and International Cooperation: The Impact of Protest on U. S. Arms Control Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Koblentz, Gregory, “Pathogens as Weapons: The International Security Implications of Biological Warfare,” International Security, vol. 28, no. 3 (Winter 2003/04), pp. 84–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kort, Michael, “Casualty Projections for the Invasion of Japan, Phantom Estimates, and the Math of Barton Bernstein,” Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations Newsletter (December 2003).Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V., Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Keith, “Multilateral Diplomacy, Norm Building and UN Conferences: The Case of Small Arms and Light Weapons,” Global Governance, vol. 8 (2002), pp. 247–63.Google Scholar
Kristensen, Hans M., U. S. Nuclear Strategy Reform in the 1990s, Nautilus Institute Working Paper (March 2000).
Lang, Daniel, “A Reporter at Large,” The New Yorker, June 8, 1946, p. 62.Google Scholar
Larsen, Jeffrey A., ed., Arms Control and a Changing Environment (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002)Google Scholar
Lavoy, Peter R., Sagan, Scott D., and Wirtz, James J., Planning the Unthinkable: How New Nuclear Powers Will Use Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Weapons (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, “The Cuban Missile Crisis: Reading the Lessons Correctly,” Political Science Quarterly, vol. 98 (Fall 1983), pp. 431–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, and Gross Stein, Janice, We All Lost the Cold War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, and Gross Stein, JaniceRational Deterrence Theory: I Think, Therefore I Deter,” World Politics, vol. 41, no. 2 (January 1989), pp. 208–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Steven P., Morality, Prudence, and Nuclear Weapons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leffler, Melvyn, A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration, and the Cold War (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Legro, Jeffrey W., Cooperation Under Fire: Anglo-German Restraint During World War II (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Lettow, Paul, Ronald Reagan and his Quest to Make Nuclear Weapons Obsolete (New York: Random House, 2006).Google Scholar
Levi, Michael, “Nuclear Bunker Buster Bombs,” Scientific American, vol. 291, no. 2 (August 2004), pp. 66–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, David K., Convention: A Philosophical Study (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Lewis, George, “The Future of U. S. Nonstrategic Forces,” in Flournoy, Michele, ed., Nuclear Weapons After the Cold War: Guidelines for U. S. Policy (New York: HarperCollins, 1993), pp. 104–40.Google Scholar
Lewis, Michael W., “The Law of Aerial Bombardment in the 1991 Gulf War,” American Journal of International Law, vol. 97, no. 3 (July 2003), pp. 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifton, Robert J., and Mitchell, Greg, Hiroshima in America: Fifty Years of Denial (New York: Putnam's, 1995).Google Scholar
Little, Daniel, “Rational Choice Theory,” in Varieties of Social Explanation (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991).
Lockwood, Dunbar, “Nuclear Posture Review Shows Little Change in Policies,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 9 (November 1994), pp. 27, 32.Google Scholar
Lockwood, DunbarThe Status of U. S., Russian, and Chinese Nuclear Forces in Northeast Asia,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 9 (November 1994), pp. 21–24.Google Scholar
Lockwood, DunbarUkraine Accedes (Finally) to NPT; Opens Way to START Reductions,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 10 (December 1994), p. 17.Google Scholar
Lofland, John, Polite Protesters: The American Peace Movement of the 1980s (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, David H., Moral Vision in International Politics, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward, “An Emerging Post-Nuclear Era?” Washington Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 1 (Winter 1988), pp. 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEachin, Douglas J., The Final Months of the War With Japan: Signals Intelligence, U. S. Invasion Planning, and the A-Bomb Decision (Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence, 1998).Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Donald, and Spinardi, Graham, “Tacit Knowledge, Weapons Design, and the Uninvention of Nuclear Weapons,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 101, no. 1 (July 1995), pp. 44–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMillan, Stuart, Neither Confirm Nor Deny: The Nuclear Ships Dispute Between New Zealand and the United States (New York: Praeger, 1987).Google Scholar
Maddox, Robert, Weapons for Victory: The Hiroshima Decision 50 Years Later (Columbia, MI: University of Missouri, 1995).Google Scholar
Madsen, Mark H. “The Image and Impact of World Opinion: Foreign Policy Making and Opinion Abroad,” Ph.D. diss., Harvard Dept. of Government, 1986.
Mandelbaum, Michael, The Nuclear Revolution: International Politics Before and After Hiroshima (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 240–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangano, Joseph J., Sternglass, Ernest J., Gould, Jay M., Sherman, Janette D., Brown, Jerry, and McDonnell, William, “Strontium-90 in Newborns and Childhood Disease,” Archives of Environmental Health, vol. 55, no. 4 (July/August 2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P., “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4 (Autumn 1998), pp. 949–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Susan B., “Realism and Weapons of Mass Destruction: A Consequentialist Analysis,” in Hashmi, Sohail H. and Lee, Steven P., eds., Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 96–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Susan B.The Role of Biological Weapons in International Politics: The Real Military Revolution,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 25, no. 1 (March 2002), pp. 63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mass and Elite Views on Nuclear Security: U. S. National Security Surveys, 1993– 1999, University of New Mexico Institute of Public Policy, at http://bush.tamu.edu/content/faculty/nsp/99_vol2.html.
Matlock, Jack R., Autopsy on an Empire: The American Ambassador's Account of the Collapse of the Soviet Union (New York: Random House, 1995).Google Scholar
Mavrodes, George I., “Conventions and the Morality of War,” in Beitz, Charles, Cohen, Marshall, Scanlon, Thomas, and Simmons, A. John, eds., International Ethics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985), pp. 75–89.Google Scholar
May, Ernest R., and Zelikow, Philip D., The Kennedy Tapes: Inside the White House During the Cuban Missile Crisis (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1997).Google Scholar
McCrea, Frances B., and Markle, Gerald E., Minutes to Midnight: Nuclear Weapons Protest in America (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989).Google Scholar
McElroy, Robert W., Morality and American Foreign Policy: The Role of Ethics in International Affairs (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
McGwire, Michael, Military Objectives in Soviet Foreign Policy (Washington, DC: Brookings, 1987).Google Scholar
McNamara, Robert, “The Military Role of Nuclear Weapons: Perceptions and Misperceptions,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 62, no. 1 (Fall 1983), pp. 58–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Robert, Kaysen, Carl, and Rathjens, George, “Nuclear Weapons After the Cold War,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 70, no. 4 (Fall 1991), pp. 95–111.Google Scholar
McNamara, Robert S., Blight, James G., and Brigham, Robert K., Argument Without End (New York: Public Affairs, 1999).Google Scholar
Mead, Margaret, “Tabu,” Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. VII (Macmillan, 1937).Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security, vol. 19, no. 3 (Winter 1994/95), pp. 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meilinger, Philip S., Hoyt S. Vandenberg: The Life of a General (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan, Reputation and International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Miles, Rufus E. Jr., “Hiroshima: The Strange Myth of Half a Million American Lives Saved,” International Security, vol. 10 (Fall 1985), pp. 121–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne, Tom, “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Workshop Report, Pugwash Meeting No. 279, November 2002, at www.pugwash.org/reports/nw/milne.htm.
Mlyn, Eric, The State, Society and Limited Nuclear War (Albany, NY: State University Press of New York, 1995).Google Scholar
Morgan, Patrick M., Deterrence: A Conceptual Analysis, vol. 40, Sage Library of Social Research (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1977).Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans, “Is World Opinion a Myth?,” New York Times Magazine, March 25, 1962.Google Scholar
Morris, Roger, Uncertain Greatness: Henry Kissinger and American Foreign Policy (New York: Harper & Row, 1977).Google Scholar
Morrison, Philip, and Tsipis, Kosta, “Rightful Names,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 59, no. 3 (May/June 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, James D., “The Laws of War, Common Conjectures and Legal Systems in International Politics,” Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 31, pt. 2 (January 2002), pp. S41–S60.Google Scholar
“The Most Terrible Bomb of All,” U. S. News and World Report, May 30, 1960.
Most, Benjamin A., and Starr, Harvey, “International Relations Theory, Foreign Policy Substitutability, and Nice Laws,” World Politics, vol. 36, no. 3 (April 1984), pp. 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moxley, Charles Jr., Nuclear Weapons and International Law in the Post-Cold War World (Lanham, MD: Austin & Winfield, 2000).Google Scholar
Mueller, John, War, Presidents and Public Opinion (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1973).Google Scholar
Mueller, JohnRetreat from Doomsday: The Obsolescence of Major War (New York: Basic Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Mueller, John “American Public Opinion and the Gulf War,” in Renshon, Stanley A., ed., The Political Psychology of the Gulf War: Leaders, Publics, and the Conflict Process (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1993), pp. 199–226.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald, “Maintaining Non-Nuclear Weapons Status,” in Cowan Karp, Regina, ed., Security With Nuclear Weapons? Different Perspectives on National Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 301–39.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald “The Internalization of Principles, Norms and Rules by Governments: The Case of Security Regimes,” in Rittberger, Volker, ed., Regime Theory and International Relations (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993), pp. 361–88.Google Scholar
Müller, Harald, Kotter, Wolfgang, and Fischer, David, Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Global Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Munves, James, “Nuclear Arms, the Law and You,” Nuclear Times, April 1983.Google Scholar
Murray, Thomas, Nuclear Policy for War and Peace (Cleveland, OH: World Publishing Co., 1960).Google Scholar
Myrdal, Alva, The Game of Disarmament: How the United States and Russia Run the Arms Race (New York: Pantheon, 1976).Google Scholar
Nadelmann, Ethan, “Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society,” International Organization, vol. 44, no. 4 (Autumn 1990), pp. 479–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanda, Ved, and Krieger, David, Nuclear Weapons and the World Court (Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers, 1998).Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert W., “Nuclear ‘Bunker Busters’ Would More Likely Disperse Than Destroy Buried Stockpiles of Biological and Chemical Agents,” Science and Global Security, vol. 12, nos. 1–2 (January/August 2004), pp. 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Agenda Coalition, “Nonproliferation and Disarmament Go Hand in Hand,” International Herald Tribune, September 22, 2004.
Newhouse, John, War and Peace in the Nuclear Age (New York: Knopf, 1989).Google Scholar
Newman, Robert P., Truman and the Hiroshima Cult (East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard M., “Needed in Vietnam: The Will to Win,” Reader's Digest, August 1964, pp. 37–43.Google Scholar
Norris, Robert S., Racing for the Bomb: General Leslie Groves, The Manhattan Project's Indispensable Man (South Royalton, VT: Steerforth Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Norris, Robert, and Arkin, William M., “U. S. Nuclear Stockpile, July 1997,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 53, no. 4 (July/August 1997), pp. 62–63.Google Scholar
Norris, Robert, Arkin, William, and Burr, William, “Where They Were,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 55, no. 6 (November/December 1999), pp. 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Robert, and Kristensen, Hans M., “Global Nuclear Stockpiles, 1945–2002,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 58, no. 6 (November/December 2002), pp. 103–04.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Nuclear Notebook,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (January/February, 1991).
Nye, Joseph P., “Nuclear Learning: US–Soviet Security Regimes,” International Organization, vol. 41, no. 3 (Summer 1987), pp. 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, Joseph P. “U. S.–Soviet Cooperation in a Non-Proliferation Regime,” in Alexander, L. George, Farley, Philip, and Dallin, Alexander, eds., U. S.–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 335–52.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S., and Smith, Roger K., eds., After the Storm: Lessons from the Gulf War, The Aspen Institute (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1992).Google Scholar
O'Loughlin, John, Meyer, Tom, Greenberg, Edward, eds., War and Its Consequences: Lessons from the Persian Gulf Conflict (New York: HarperCollins, 1994).Google Scholar
O'Neill, Dan, The Firecracker Boys (New York: St. Martin's Griffin, 1995).Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas, World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Osgood, Robert, Limited War: The Challenge to American Strategy (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Osgood, RobertNATO: The Entangling Alliance (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Panofsky, Wolfgang K. H., and Bunn, George, “The Doctrine of the Nuclear-Weapon States and the Future of Non-Proliferation,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 7 (July/August 1994), pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Pape, Robert A., Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion in War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Pape, Robert A., and Kaufmann, Chaim, “Explaining Costly International Moral Action: Britain's Sixty-Year Campaign Against the Atlantic Slave Trade,” International Organization, vol. 53, no. 4 (Autumn 1999), pp. 631–68.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V., “Nuclear Taboo and War Initiation in Regional Conflicts,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 39, no. 4 (December 1995), pp. 696–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkovich, George, “Nuclear Proliferation: Think Again,” Foreign Policy, vol. 112 (Fall 1998), pp. 12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkovich, GeorgeIndia's Nuclear Bomb (Berkeley: University of California, 2001).Google Scholar
Perry, William J., “Desert Storm and Deterrence,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 70, no. 4 (Fall 1991), pp. 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, John, “Nuclear Threats During the Gulf War,” February 19, 1998 at www.fas.org/irp/eprint/ds-threats.htm.
Porpora, Douglas V., “Cultural Rules and Material Relations,” Sociological Theory, vol. 11, no. 2 (July 1993), pp. 212–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portela, Clara, “The EU and the NPT: Testing the New European Nonproliferation Strategy,” Disarmament Diplomacy, no. 78 (July/August 2004).Google Scholar
Potter, William C., “The Politics of Nuclear Renunciation: The Cases of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine,” Occasional Paper No. 22 (Washington, DC: The Henry L. Stimson Center, April 1995).
Prados, John, and Stubbe, Ray W., Valley of Decision: The Seige of Khe Sanh (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1991).Google Scholar
Price, Richard, The Chemical Weapons Taboo (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Price, RichardReversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Landmines,” International Organization, vol. 52, no. 3 (Summer 1998), pp. 613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard and Nina Tannenwald, “Norms and Deterrence: The Nuclear and Chemical Weapons Taboos,” in Katzenstein, Peter, ed., The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), pp. 114–52.Google Scholar
The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare, vol. I, SIPRI (New York: Humanities Press, 1971).
“Public Attitudes on Nuclear Weapons: An Opportunity for Leadership” (The Henry L. Stimson Center, Washington, DC, 1998).
Quester, George H., Deterrence Before Hiroshima: The Airpower Background of Modern Strategy (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1966).Google Scholar
Quester, George H. “Conceptions of Nuclear Threshold Status,” in Cowan Karp, Regina, ed., Security With Nuclear Weapons? Different Perspectives on National Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 209–28.Google Scholar
Quester, George H., Nuclear Monopoly (New Brunswick, NY: Transaction Publishers, 2000).Google Scholar
Quester, George H., and Utgoff, Victor A., “Toward an International Nuclear Security Policy,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 4 (1994), pp. 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabe, Stephen G.Eisenhower Revisionism: a Decade of Scholarship: Review Article,” Diplomatic History, vol. 17 (Winter 1993), pp. 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R., Taboo (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1939).Google Scholar
Ray, James Lee, “The Abolition of Slavery and the End of International War,” International Organization, vol. 43, no. 3 (Summer 1989), pp. 405–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, Thornton, A Proposal to Neutralize Nuclear Weapons, Center of International Studies, Policy Memo no. 22 (Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson School, 1961).Google Scholar
Read, Thornton, “Limited Strategic War and Tactical Nuclear War,” in Knorr, Klaus and Read, Thornton, eds., Limited Strategic War (New York: Praeger, 1962), pp. 67–116.Google Scholar
Rearden, Steven L., History of the Office of Secretary of Defense, vol. I, The Formative Years 1947–50 (Washington, DC, 1984).Google Scholar
Record, Jeffrey, Hollow Victory: A Contrary View of the Gulf War (New York: Brassey's (US), 1993).Google Scholar
Redick, John R., “Latin America's Emerging Non-Proliferation Consensus,” Arms Control Today, vol. 24, no. 2 (March 1994), pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Reiss, Mitchell, Bridled Ambition: Why Countries Constrain their Nuclear Capabilities (Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Renshon, Stanley A., ed., The Political Psychology of the Gulf War: Leaders, Publics, and the Conflict Process (Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Rice, Condoleezza, “SALT and the Search for a Security Regime,” in Alexander, L. George, Farley, Philip J., and Dallin, Alexander, eds., U. S.–Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Ridgway, Matthew, The Korean War (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1967).Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas, “International Norms and Domestic Change: Arguing and Communicative Behavior in the Human Rights Area,” Politics and Society, vol. 27, no. 4 (December 1999), pp. 529–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C., and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds., The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, The Zero Option: INF, West Germany and Arms Control (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1988).Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, ThomasCooperation Among Democracies: The European Influence on U. S. Foreign Policy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Robertson, David, Sly and Able: A Political Biography of James F. Byrnes (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1994).Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul, “Pursuing a New Nuclear Weapons Policy for the 21st Century,” March 22, 2001, at www.sandia.gov/media/whitepaper/2001-04-Robinson.htm.
Rochon, Thomas R., Mobilizing for Peace: The Antinuclear Movements in Western Europe (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochon, Thomas R., and Meyer, David, eds., Coalitions and Political Movements: The Lessons of the Nuclear Freeze (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1997).Google Scholar
Roman, Peter, “Curtis LeMay and the Origins of NATO Atomic Targeting,” Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 16, no. 1 (March 1993), pp. 46–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Clive, Campaigns Against Western Defense: NATO's Adversaries and Critics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Mark E., “Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones,” Naval War College Review, vol. 49, no. 4 (Autumn 1996), pp. 44–66.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James, and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, eds., Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1989).Google Scholar
Rosenberg, David Alan, “The Origins of Overkill: Nuclear Weapons and American Strategy, 1945–1960,” International Security, vol. 7, no. 4 (Spring 1983), pp. 3–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosendorf, Neal, “John Foster Dulles' Nuclear Schizophrenia,” in Gaddis, John Lewis, Gordon, Philip H., May, Ernest R., and Rosenberg, Jonathan, eds., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb: Nuclear Diplomacy since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 62–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, Larry A., “No First Use: A Codification of Deterrence,” unpublished manuscript (Madison, WI: December, 1982).
Rostow, Walt W., The Diffusion of Power (New York: Macmillan, 1972).Google Scholar
Rotblat, Joseph, Scientists in the Quest for Peace: A History of the Pugwash Conferences (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1972).Google Scholar
Rotblat, JosephLeaving the Bomb Project,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 41, no. 7 (August 1985), pp. 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, Steve, “The Publication of ‘Hiroshima’ in The New Yorker,” unpublished paper (Harvard University, 1997).
Rubin, Alfred, “The Neutron Bomb Again,” Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 21, no. 4 (1981), pp. 805–11.Google Scholar
Rubin, Alfred “Nuclear Weapons and International Law,” unpublished manuscript (Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, June 1983).
Rusciano, Frank Louis, et al., World Opinion and the Emerging International Order (Westport, CT: Praeger, 1998).Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, “Ethical Dilemmas of Nuclear Deterrance,” International Security, vol. 8, no. 4 (Spring 1984), pp. 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russett, Bruce “The Real Decline of Nuclear Hegemony,” in Rosenau, James and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, eds., Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990s (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1989), pp. 177–93.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce “An Acceptable Role for Nuclear Weapons?” in Kegley, Charles and Schwab, Kenneth L., eds., After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991), pp. 121–45.Google Scholar
Russett, BruceGrasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World (Princeton, NJ: University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Rutherford, Kenneth, Brem, Stefen, and Matthew, Richard A., eds., Reframing the Agenda: The Impact of NGO and Middle Power Cooperation in International Security (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003).Google Scholar
Safire, William, “On Language: Weapons of Mass Destruction,” New York Times Magazine, April 19, 1998, p. 22.Google Scholar
Sagan, Scott, The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Sagan, ScottPerils of Proliferation,” International Security, vol. 18, no. 4 (Spring 1994), pp. 77–81.Google Scholar
Sagan, ScottWhy Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of a Bomb,” International Security, vol. 21, no. 3 (Winter 1996/97), pp. 54–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagan, Scott “Realist Perspectives on Ethical Norms and Weapons of Mass Destruction,” in Hashmi, Sohail H. and Lee, Steven P., eds., Ethics and Weapons of Mass Destruction: Religious and Secular Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, Ralph, “Nuclear Dynamite: A New Dimension in Foreign Policy,” Orbis, vol. 4, no. 1 (1960), pp. 307–22.Google Scholar
Saunders, Philip and Jing-Dong Yuan, “China's Strategic Force Modernization: Issues and Implications for the United States,” Center for Nonproliferation Studies, Monterey Institute of International Studies, 2000, at cns.miis.edu/cns/projects/eanp/conf/op4_sjd.pdf.
Sayle, Murray, “Letter from Hiroshima: Did the Bomb End the War?” New Yorker, July 31, 1995, pp. 40–64.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey, “Normative Explanations,” in Braybrooke, David, ed., Social Rules: Origin, Character, Logic, Change (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1996), pp. 35–51.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Ronald, Wings of Judgement: American Bombing in World War II (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Schapiro, Mark, “Mutiny on the Nuclear Bounty: Nonaligned versus the Bomb,” The Nation, vol. 227, no. 22 (December 27, 1993), pp. 798–800.Google Scholar
Scheer, Robert, With Enough Shovels: Reagan, Bush and Nuclear War (New York: Random House, 1982).Google Scholar
Scheinman, Lawrence, “The Non-Proliferation Treaty: On the Road to 1995,” IAEA Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 1 (1992).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas, Nuclear Weapons and Limited War (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1959).Google Scholar
Schelling, ThomasThe Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1960, reprint 1980).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas “The Role of Nuclear Weapons,” in Ederington, L. Benjamin and Mazarr, Michael J., eds., Turning Point: The Gulf War and U. S. Military Stratetgy (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994), pp. 105–15.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas “Forward”, in Larsen, Jeffrey A., ed., Arms Control and a Changing Environment (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas “The Legacy of Hiroshima: A Half-Century without Nuclear War,” Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, at www.puaf.umd.edu/IPPP/Summer00/legacy_of_hiroshima.htm.
Schimmelfennig, Frank, “Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union,” International Organization, vol. 55, no. 1 (2001), pp. 47–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlaim, Avi, The United States and the Berlin Blockade, 1948–49 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., “The International Court of Justice and the Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Naval War College Review, vol. 51, no. 2 (Spring 1998), pp. 91–116.Google Scholar
Schnabel, James F. and Watson, Robert J., The History of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, vol. III, Korean War, part 1 (Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1979).Google Scholar
Schnell, Jonathan, The Gift of Time: The Case for Abolishing Nuclear Weapons Now (New York: Henry Holt, 1998).Google Scholar
Schwartz, David N., “A Historical Perspective,” in Steinbruner, John D. and Sigal, Leon V., eds., Alliance Security: NATO and the No-First-Use Question (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1983), pp. 5–21.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Stephen I., ed., Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of U. S. Nuclear Weapons Since 1940 (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Seaborg, Glenn T., with Loeb, Benjamin, Stemming the Tide: Arms Control in the Johnson Years (Lexington, KY: Lexington Books, 1987).Google Scholar
Searle, John R., The Construction of Social Reality (New York: The Free Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Serrano, Monica, “Latin America – The Treaty of Tlatelolco,” in Thakur, Ramesh, ed., Nuclear Weapons-Free Zones (New York: St. Martin's, 1998), pp. 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Adam, “Nuclear Weapons Free Zones: The Solution to Nuclear Disarmament?”, UN Chronicle, vol. 41, no. 3 (2004).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Mark, “Mutiny on the Nuclear Bounty: Nonaligned versus the Bomb,” The Nation, December 27, 1993.Google Scholar
Shen, Dingli, “Toward a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World: A Chinese Perspective,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, vol. 51, no. 2 (March/April 1994), pp. 51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherwin, Martin, A World Destroyed: The Atomic Bomb and the Grand Alliance (New York: Knopf, 1975).Google Scholar
Sigal, Leon V., Fighting to a Finish: The Politics of War Termination in the United States and Japan, 1945 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Simpson, John, and Howlett, Darryl, “The NPT Renewal Conference: Stumbling Toward 1995,” International Security, vol. 19, no. 1 (Summer 1994), pp. 41–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Jasjit, “Indian Draft Nuclear Doctrine: Some Reflections,” September 1999, at www.pugwash.org/reports/nw/nw7.htm.
SIPRI, “The Non-Use of CB Weapons during World War II,” in The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare, vols. I and II (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1971).
SIPRI “The Right to Conduct Nuclear Explosions: Political Aspects and Policy Proposals,” Stockholm Paper No. 6 (Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 1975).
SIPRIYearbook 1990: World Armaments and Disarmament (Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 1990).
Smith, Alice Kimball, A Peril and a Hope: The Scientists' Movement in America, 1945–47 (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Smith, Jackie, Chatfield, Charles, and Pugnucco, Ron, eds., Transnational Social Movements and Global Politics: Solidarity Beyond the State (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Snow, C. P., “The Moral Un-Neutrality of Science,” Science, vol. 133, no. 3448 (January 27, 1961), p. 259.
Snowden, Lynn, “How Likely are Terrorists to Use a Nuclear Strategy?” American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 46, no. 6 (February 2003), pp. 699–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H., Deterrence and Defense (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, Richard, The Impact of Public Opinion on U. S. Foreign Policy Since Vietnam (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Sokov, Nikolai, “Russia's New National Security Concept: The Nuclear Angle” (January 2000, revised July 2004), at www.nti.org/db/nisprofs/over/concept.htm.
Sokov, NikolaiWhy Do States Rely on Nuclear Weapons? The Case of Russia and Beyond,” The Nonproliferation Review, vol. 9, no. 2 (Summer 2002), pp. 101–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokov, Nikolai “Russia's Nuclear Doctrine,” Research Report, Center for Nonproliferation Studies, August 2004, at www.nti.org/_research/3_55a.html.
Soman, Appu K., Double-Edged Sword: Nuclear Diplomacy in Unequal Conflicts: The United States and China, 1950–58 (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2000).Google Scholar
Spanier, John W., and Nogee, Joseph L., The Politics of Disarmament: A Study of Soviet–American Gamesmanship (New York: Praeger, 1962).Google Scholar
Spector, Leonard, The Undeclared Bomb (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1988).Google Scholar
Stein, Peter, and Feaver, Peter, Assuring Control of Nuclear Weapons: The Evolution of Permissive Action Links (Cambridge, MA: Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, 1987).Google Scholar
Steinberger, Jack, Udgaonkar, Bhalchandra, and Rotblat, Joseph, eds., A Nuclear-Weapon-Free World (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Steinbruner, John, “Renovating Arms Control Through Reassurance,” Washington Quarterly, vol. 23, no. 2 (Spring 2000), pp. 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbruner, John D., and Sigal, Leon V., eds., Alliance Security: NATO and the No-First-Use Question (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1983).Google Scholar
Steiner, Franz, Taboo (London: Cohen and West, 1956).Google Scholar
Stern, Jessica, “Terrorist Motivations and Unconventional Weapons,” in Lavoy, Peter R., Sagan, Scott D., and Wirtz, James J., Planning the Unthinkable: How New Nuclear Powers Will Use Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Weapons (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000), pp. 202–29.Google Scholar
Stern, Paul, Axelrod, Robert, Jervis, Robert, and Radnor, Roy, eds., Perspectives on Deterrence (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Stern, Sheldon, Averting the ‘Final Failure:’ John F. Kennedy and the Secret Cuban Missile Crisis Meetings (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Stevens, David, “Dangerous Precedents: Emulation and Norm Violation in Foreign Policy Decision-Making,” unpublished paper, Columbia University, April 30, 2004.
Stigler, George and Becker, Gary, “De Gustibus Non est Disputandum,” American Economic Review, vol. 67 (1977), pp. 76–90.Google Scholar
Stimson, Henry, “The Decision to Use the Bomb,” Harper's, vol. 194, no. 1161 (February 1947), pp. 97–107.Google Scholar
Stromseth, Jane, The Origins of Flexible Response: NATO's Debate Over Strategy in the 1960s (New York: St. Martin's, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, Robert A., Working in the World: Jimmy Carter and the Making of American Foreign Policy (Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University, 2000).Google Scholar
Stueck, William, The Korean War: An International History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert, “The Role of Inductive Reasoning in the Evolution of Conventions,” Law and Philosophy, vol. 17, no. 4 (1998), pp. 377–410.Google Scholar
Szulc, Tad, The Illusion of Peace: Foreign Policy in the Nixon Years (New York: Viking Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Takaki, Ronald, Why America Dropped the Bomb (New York: Little, Brown & Co., 1995).Google Scholar
Talbott, Strobe, Master of the Game: Paul Nitze and the Nuclear Peace (New York: Knopf, 1988).Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina, “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use,” International Organization, vol. 53, no. 3 (Summer 1999), pp. 433–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannenwald, NinaKeeping Weapons from Terrorists: The Urgent Need for Arms Control,” Brown Journal of World Affairs, vol. 8, no. 2 (Winter 2001), pp. 27–36.Google Scholar
“Targeting Ho Chi Minh Trail,” at www.nautilus.org/VietnamFOIA/background/HoChiMinhTrail.html.
Taylor, Richard, Against the Bomb: The British Peace Movement, 1958–1965 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Taylor, Richard, and Pritchard, Charles, The Protest-Makers (London: Pergamon, 1982).Google Scholar
Terriff, Terry, The Nixon Administration and the Making of U. S. Nuclear Strategy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Thakur, Ramesh, “Stepping Stones to a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World,” in Thakur, Ramesh, ed., Nuclear Weapons-Free Zones (New York: St. Martin's, 1998), pp. 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Ward, Ethics of Destruction: Norms and Force in International Relations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Thomas, William I., and Swaine Thomas, Dorothy, The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs (New York: A. A. Knopf, 1928).Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc, “A ‘Wasting Asset’: American Strategy and the Shifting Nuclear Balance, 1949–1954,” International Security, vol. 13, no. 3 (Winter 1988/89), pp. 5–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtenberg, Marc “The Berlin Crisis,” in Trachtenberg, , History and Strategy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991), pp. 169–234.Google Scholar
Tucker, Jonathan B., Brad Roberts, and Elisa Harris, “Chemical and Biological Weapons,” in Cirincione, Joseph, ed., Repairing the Regime: Preventing the Spread of Weapons of Mass Destruction (New York: Routledge, 2000), pp. 217–32.Google Scholar
Tucker, Jonathan B., Brad Roberts, and Elisa Harris “The Nuclear Future: Political and Social Considerations,” CNSS Papers, No. 11 (Center for National Security Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, June 1988).
Tucker, Robert, and Hendrickson, David, The Imperial Temptation: The New World Order and America's Purpose (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 1992).Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert C., Knorr, Klaus, Richard, A. Falk, and Bull, Hedley, Proposal for No First Use of Nuclear Weapons: Pros and Cons, Center of International Studies, Policy Memo No. 28 (Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson School, 1963).Google Scholar
Turner, Stansfield, Caging the Genies: A Workable Solution for Nuclear, Chemical and Biological Weapons (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Ullman, Richard H., “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 50, no. 4 (July 1972), pp. 669–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman-Margalit, Edna, The Emergence of Norms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Union of Concerned Scientists, No First Use (Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1983).
United Nations, The United Nations and Disarmament, 1945–1970 (New York: United Nations, 1970).
United NationsThe United Nations and Nuclear Non-Proliferation (New York: United Nations, 1995).
US News and World Report, Triumph Without Victory: The Unreported History of the Persian Gulf War (NY: Times Books/Random House, 1992).
Courtland Moon, John Ellis, “Chemical Weapons and Deterrence: The WWII Experience,” International Security, vol. 8, no. 4 (Spring 1984), pp. 3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crevald, Martin, Technology and War: From 2000 B. C. to the Present (New York: Free Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Crevald, MartinNuclear Proliferation and the Future of Conflict (New York: Free Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Voorst, Bruce J., “The Churches and Nuclear Deterrence,” Foreign Affairs, vol. 61, no. 4 (Spring 1983), pp. 827–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitzthum, Wolfgang Graf, “The World Nuclear Order and the Equality of States,” Law and State, vol. 25 (1982), pp. 23–50.Google Scholar
Wright, G. H., Explanation and Understanding (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Walker, J. Samuel, “The Decision to Use the Bomb: A Historiographical Update,” Diplomatic History, vol. 14, no. 1 (Winter 1990), pp. 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J. SamuelPrompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Walker, William, “Nuclear Order and Disorder,” International Affairs, vol. 76, no. 4 (2000), pp. 703–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, Douglas C., Congress and the Nuclear Freeze: An Inside Look at the Politics of a Mass Movement (Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, 1987).Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979).Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N.The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: More May Be Better, Adelphi Paper No. 171 (London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1981).Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N.Kenneth, N. Waltz and Scott, D. Sagan, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed, (New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 2003).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (New York: Basic Books, 1992), 2nd edn.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael “Justice and Injustice in the Gulf War,” in Decosse, David E., ed., But Was It Just? Reflections on the Morality of the Persian Gulf War (New York: Doubleday, 1992), pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, and Fussell, Paul, “An Exchange on Hiroshima,” The New Republic, September 23, 1981, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar
Ware, Alyn, “The World Court and Nuclear Weapons: Who Is Listening?” UN Chronicle, vol. 36, no. 4 (1999).Google Scholar
Ware, Alyn “NGO and Government Cooperation in Setting the Disarmament Agenda: The Impact of the 1996 International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion,” in Rutherford, Kenneth, Brem, Stefen, and Matthew, Richard A., eds., Reframing the Agenda: The Impact of NGO and Middle Power Cooperation in International Security (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2003), pp. 113–42.Google Scholar
Warnke, Paul, “Now More than Ever: No First Use,” in Kegley, Charles W. and Schwab, Kenneth L., eds., After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991), pp. 55–65.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Sherri L., The Neutron Bomb Controversy: A Study in Alliance Politics (New York: Praeger, 1983).Google Scholar
Weathersby, Kathryn, ed. and trans., “New Russian Documents on the Korean War,” Cold War International History Project Bulletin, no. 6–7 (Winter 1995/96).Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E., The Social Psychology of Organizing (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1969).Google Scholar
Weiler, Lawrence, “The Evolution of the Concept of No First Use,” unpublished manuscript, NYC Conference: Council for a Livable World, October 24, 1982.
Weinberg, Alvin, “The Sanctification of Hiroshima,” Oak Ridge Associated Universities, November 1995.
Weinberg, Alvin “The Bell and the Bomb,” Cosmos Journal (1997), at www.cosmos-club.org/journals/1997/index.html.
Weingast, Barry, “A Rational Choice Perspective on the Role of Ideas: Shared Belief Systems and State Sovereignty in International Cooperation,” Politics and Society, vol. 12 (December 1995), pp. 449–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, David, Justice and the Genesis of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, Andreas, Living With Peril: Eisenhower, Kennedy and Nuclear Weapons (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997).Google Scholar
Westing, Arthur, ed., Cultural Norms, War and the Environment, SIPRI (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Wheeler, John Archibald, with Ford, Kenneth, Geons, Black Holes, and Quantum Foam: A Life in Physics (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1998).Google Scholar
White, Theodore H., The Making of the President 1964 (New York: Athenaeum Publishers, 1965).Google Scholar
Whiting, Alan, China Cross the Yalu (New York: Macmillan, 1960).Google Scholar
Williamson, Samuel R., and Reardon, Steven L., The Origins of U. S. Nuclear Strategy, 1945–1953 (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willrich, Mason, “No First Use of Nuclear Weapons: An Assessment,” Orbis, vol. 9, no. 2 (Summer 1965), pp. 299–315.Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence S., Rebels Against War: The American Peace Movement 1933–1983 (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1984), rev. edn.Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence S.One World or None: A History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement Through 1953, vol. I of The Struggle Against the Bomb (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993).
Wittner, Lawrence S.Resisting the Bomb: A History of the World Nuclear Disarmament Movement, 1954–1970, vol. II of The Struggle Against the Bomb (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence S.Toward Nuclear Abolition: A History of the World Disarmament Movement, 1971 to the Present, vol. III of The Struggle Against the Bomb (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Wright, David, “The Spratt-Furse Law on Mini-Nuke Development,” Backgrounder, Union of Concerned Scientists, May 11, 2003.
Yaffe, Michael, “Nuclear Weapons and U. S. Army Organization,” manuscript (September 1990).
Yee, Albert, “Thick Rationality and the Missing ‘Brute Fact’: The Limits of Rationalist Incorporation of Norms and Ideas,” Journal of Politics, vol. 59, no. 4 (November 1997), pp. 1001–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yost, David S., “The Delegitimization of Nuclear Deterrence?” Armed Forces and Society, vol. 16, no. 4 (Summer 1990), pp. 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Jing-Dong, “Chinese Responses to U. S. Missile Defenses: Implications for Arms Control and Regional Security,” Nonproliferation Review, vol. 10 (Spring 2003), pp. 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaborsky, Victor, “Nuclear Disarmament and Non-Proliferation: The Evolution of the Ukrainian Case,” CSIA Discussion Paper 94–05, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, June 1994.
Zhara, Farah, “Pakistan's Road to a Minimum Nuclear Deterrent,” Arms Control Today, vol. 29, no. 5 (July/August 1999), pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
Zook, Darren C., “A Culture of Deterrence: Nuclear Myths and Cultural Chauvinism in South Asia,” World Policy Journal, vol. 17, no. 1 (Spring 2000), pp. 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubok, Vladislav M., and Hope M. Harrison, “The Nuclear Education of Nikita Khrushschev,” in Lewis Gaddis, Johnet al., Cold War Statesmen Confront the Bomb: Nuclear Diplomacy Since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 141–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select bibliography
  • Nina Tannenwald, Brown University, Rhode Island
  • Book: The Nuclear Taboo
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491726.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select bibliography
  • Nina Tannenwald, Brown University, Rhode Island
  • Book: The Nuclear Taboo
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491726.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select bibliography
  • Nina Tannenwald, Brown University, Rhode Island
  • Book: The Nuclear Taboo
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491726.012
Available formats
×