Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 August 2020
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Numerical Methods in Physics with Python , pp. 573 - 576Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
[1]
Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A. (eds). 1965. Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.Google Scholar
[2]
Acton, F. S. 1990. Numerical Methods That Work. The Mathematical Association of America.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]
Arfken, G. B., and Weber, J. J. 2005. Mathematical Methods for Physicists. Sixth edn. Elsevier.Google Scholar
[5]
Ascher, U. M., and Greif, C. 2011. A First Course in Numerical Methods. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]
Baumgarte, T. W., and Shapiro, S. L. 2010. Numerical Relativity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]
Becca, F., and Sorella, S. 2017. Quantum Monte Carlo Approaches for Correlated Systems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[10]
Bender, C. A., and Orszag, S. A. 1978. Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
[11]
Berrut, J.-P., and Trefethen, L. N. 2004. Barycentric Lagrange Interpolation. SIAM Review, 46, 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]
Bevington, P. R. 1992. Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences. Second edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
[14]
Broyden, C. G. 1965. A Class of Methods for Solving Nonlinear Simultaneous Equations. Mathematics of Computation, 19, 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]
Byron, F. W. Jr, and Fuller, R. W. 1992. Mathematics of Classical and Quantum Physics. Dover.Google Scholar
[16]
Caballero, D., and Hjorth-Jensen, M. 2018. Integrating a Computational Perspective in Physics Courses. Pages 47–76 of: Magazù, S. (ed), New Trends in Physics Education Research. Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
[18]
Ceperley, D. M. 1995. Path Integrals in the Theory of Condensed Helium. Reviews of Modern Physics, 67, 279.Google Scholar
[19]
Conte, S. D., and de Boor, C. 1980. Elementary Numerical Analysis. Third edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
[21]
Davio, M. 1981. Kronecker Products and Shuffle Algebra. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-30, 116.Google Scholar
[22]
Delves, L. M., and Mohamed, J. L. 1985. Computational Methods for Integral Equations. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]
Demmel, J. W. 1997. Applied Numerical Linear Algebra. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]
Duncan, A. 2012. The Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Field Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
[26]
Fetter, A. L., and Walecka, J. D. 1980. Theoretical Mechanics of Particles and Continua. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
[27]
Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., and Sands, M. L. 2010. The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Vol. 3. New millenium edn. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
[29]
Franklin, J. 2013. Computational Methods for Physics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[30]
Gil, A., Segura, J., and Temme, N. M. 2007. Numerical Methods for Special Functions. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31]
Goldberg, D. 1991. What Every Computer Scientist Should Know About Floating-Point Arithmetic. ACM Computing Surveys, 23, 5.Google Scholar
[32]
Golub, G. H., and Van Loan, C. F. 1996. Matrix Computations. Third edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
[33]
Greenbaum, A., and Chartier, T. P. 2012. Numerical Methods. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
[34]
Griffiths, D. J. 1999. Introduction to Electrodynamics. Third edn. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
[35]
Hammarling, S. 2005. An Introduction to the Quality of Computed Solutions. Pages 43–76 of: Einarsson, B. (ed), Accuracy and Reliability in Scientific Computing. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
[36]
Hamming, R. W. 1973. Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers. Second edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
[39]
Higham, N. J. 2002. Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms. Second edn. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
[40]
Hildebrand, F. D. 1974. Introduction to Numerical Analysis. Second edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
[41]
Hill, C. 2016. Learning Scientific Programming with Python. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[42]
Hoffman, J. D. 2001. Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists. Second edn. Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
[44]
Iserles, A. 2008. A First Course in the Numerical Analysis of Differential Equations. Second edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[48]
Kahan, W. 1966. Numerical Linear Algebra. Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, 7, 757.Google Scholar
[49]
Kahan, W. 1981. Why Do We Need a Floating-Point Arithmetic Standard? Technical Report, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
[50]
Kahan, W. 2005. How Futile Are Mindless Assessments of Roundoff in Floating-Point Computation? Householder Symposium XVI.Google Scholar
[51]
Kalos, M. H., and Whitlock, P. A. 1986. Monte Carlo Methods. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[52]
Kernighan, B. W., and Pike, R. 1999. The Practice of Programming. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
[54]
Kiusalaas, J. 2013. Numerical Methods in Engineering with Python 3. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[55]
Klainerman, S. 2008. Partial Differential Equations. Pages 455–483 of: Gowers, T. (ed), The Princeton Companion to Mathematics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
[56]
Knuth, D. E. 1998. The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 2. Third edn. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
[60]
Landau, R. H., Páez, M. J., and Bordeianu, C. C. 2015. Computational Physics. Third edn. Wiley-VCH.Google Scholar
[63]
Lummer, O., and Pringsheim, E. 1897. Die Strahlung eines “schwarzen” Körpers zwischen 100 and 1300 C. Annalen der Physik und Chemie, 299, 395.Google Scholar
[67]
Millikan, R. A. 1916. A Direct Photoelectric Determination of Planck’s “h”. Physical Review, 7, 355.Google Scholar
[69]
Oliveira, S., and Stewart, D. 2006. Writing Scientific Software. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[70]
Overton, M. L. 2001. Numerical Computing with IEEE Floating Point Arithmetic. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
[71]
Pethick, C. J., and Smith, H. 2008. Bose–Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases. Second edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[73]
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., and Flannery, B. P. 1992. Numerical Recipes in Fortran. Second edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[74]
Ralston, A., and Rabinowitz, P. 1978. A First Course in Numerical Analysis. Second edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
[77]
Rice, J. A. 2007. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis. Third edn. Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
[78]
Richardson, O. W., and Compton, K. T. 1912. The Photoelectric Effect. Philosophical Magazine, ( 6 ) 24, 575.Google Scholar
[79]
Ridders, C. 1979. A New Algorithm for Computing a Single Root of a Real Continuous Function. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 26, 979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[80]
Roberts, G. O., Gelman, A., and Gilks, W. R. 1997. Weak Convergence and Optimal Scaling of Random Walk Metropolis Algorithms. The Annals of Applied Probability, 7, 110.Google Scholar
[81]
Schutz, B. F. 2009. A First Course in General Relativity. Second edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[87]
Stoer, J., and Bulirsch, R. 1993. Introduction to Numerical Analysis. Second edn. Springer.Google Scholar
[88]
Stowe, K. 2007. An Introduction to Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics. Second edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[90]
Szegö, G. 1975. Orthogonal Polynomials. Fourth edn. American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
[91]
Thornton, S. T., and Marion, J. B. 2004. Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems. Fifth edn. Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
[92]
Tierney, L. 1994. Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions. The Annals of Statistics, 22, 1701.Google Scholar
[93]
Toussaint, D. 1989. Introduction to Algorithms for Monte Carlo Simulations and their Application to QCD. Computer Physics Communications, 56, 69.Google Scholar
[94]
Trefethen, L. N. 2012. Approximation Theory and Approximation Practice. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
[95]
Trefethen, L. N., and Bau, D. III. 1997. Numerical Linear Algebra. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
[97]
Širca, S., and Horvat, M. 2018. Computational Methods in Physics. Second edn. Springer.Google Scholar
[99]
Wilkinson, J. H. 1965. The Algebraic Eigenvalue Problem. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar