Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Print publication year: 2016
  • Online publication date: November 2016

5 - Developing Creativity Across All Areas of the Curriculum

from PART II - VOICES FROM THE RESEARCH
Summary

Imagination grows by exercise.

W. Somerset Maugham

This chapter will deal with two aspects of providing teachers with guidance about encouraging more creative thinking in their classrooms. The first part will focus on a few basic principles and strategies underlying creativity training and how these principles and strategies can lead us in the more practical task of developing creativity- training exercises. This section uses a “learn-by-doing” approach and will prepare you for the more advanced challenge of developing your own activities.

The second part of the chapter focuses on using the basic principles of creative thinking to develop your own activities. In this section you will be asked to examine any and all topics that are part of the regular curriculum or prescribed curricular standards and to design and infuse creative thinking activities into standards based curricular topics. This section is purposefully designed to develop your own creativity, and by so doing you will not only be enriching the regular curriculum for your students but also modeling the creative process for them.

PART 1: BASIC PRINCIPLES AND START-UP ACTIVITIES

Three Major Starting Points. Although a great deal has been written about fostering creativity in classrooms, relatively few basic teaching strategies have been effective in encouraging creative development. The starting point for teachers who would like to promote more creative behaviors in their students is a basic understanding of the difference between convergent and divergent production. In most traditional teaching-learning situations, major emphasis is placed on locating or converging on correct answers. Teachers raise questions and present problems with a predetermined response in mind, and students’ performance is usually evaluated in terms of the correctness of a particular answer and the speed and accuracy with which youngsters respond to verbal or written exercises. Thus, the types of problems raised by the teacher or textbook and the system of rewards used to evaluate student progress cause most youngsters to develop a mindset that is oriented toward zeroing in on the “right” answer as quickly and efficiently as possible. Although this ability has its place in the overall development of the learner, most teachers would agree that impressionable young minds also need opportunities to develop their rare and precious creative thinking abilities.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Nurturing Creativity in the Classroom
  • Online ISBN: 9781316212899
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316212899
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


T. M. Amabile (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 393399.

T. M. Amabile (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 393–399.

R. A. Beghetto , & J. C. Kaufman (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 7379.

R. A. Beghetto , & J. C. Kaufman (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79.

W. A. Bousfield , & W. D. Barclay (1950). The relationship between order and frequency of occurrence of restricted associated responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 643647.

W. A. Bousfield , & W. D. Barclay (1950). The relationship between order and frequency of occurrence of restricted associated responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 643–647.

T. M. Connolly , E. A. Boyle , E. MacArthur , T. Hainey , & J. M. Boyle (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661686.

T. M. Connolly , E. A. Boyle , E. MacArthur , T. Hainey , & J. M. Boyle (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686.

P. Derks , & D. Hervas (1988). Creativity in humor production: Quantity and quality in divergent thinking. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26(1), 37–39.

M. Lepper , D. Greene , & R. Nisbet (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–137.

M. Lepper , D. Greene , & R. Nisbet (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic rewards: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129137.

E. Mellou (1995). Review of the relationship between dramatic play and creativity in young children. Early Child Development and Care, 112, 85107.

E. Mellou (1995). Review of the relationship between dramatic play and creativity in young children. Early Child Development and Care, 112, 85–107.

L. H. Rose , & H. T. Lin (1984). A meta-analysis of long-term creativity, training programs. Journal of Creative Behavior, 18(1), 11–22.

L. H. Rose , & H. T. Lin (1984). A meta-analysis of long-term creativity, training programs. Journal of Creative Behavior, 18(1), 1122.

M. A. Runco (1986). Flexibility and originality in children's divergent thinking. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 120, 345–352.