Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Frontiers in device engineering
- 2 Atoms-up design
- 3 Electron devices and electron transport
- 4 Aperiodic dielectric design
- 5 Design at the classical–quantum boundary
- 6 Robust optimization in high dimensions
- 7 Mathematical framework for optimal design
- 8 Future directions
- Appendix A Global optimization algorithms
- About the authors
- Index
- References
6 - Robust optimization in high dimensions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Frontiers in device engineering
- 2 Atoms-up design
- 3 Electron devices and electron transport
- 4 Aperiodic dielectric design
- 5 Design at the classical–quantum boundary
- 6 Robust optimization in high dimensions
- 7 Mathematical framework for optimal design
- 8 Future directions
- Appendix A Global optimization algorithms
- About the authors
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
Optimization has a distinguished history in engineering and industrial design. Most approaches, however, assume that the input parameters are precisely known and that the implementation does not suffer any errors. Information used to model a problem is often noisy, incomplete or even erroneous. In science and engineering, measurement errors are inevitable. In business applications, the cost and selling price as well as the demand for a product are, at best, expert opinions. Moreover, even if uncertainties in the model data can be ignored, solutions cannot be implemented to infinite precision, as assumed in continuous optimization. Therefore, an “optimal” solution can easily be sub-optimal or, even worse, infeasible.
There has been evidence illustrating that if errors (in implementation or estimation of parameters) are not taken into account during the design process, the actual phenomenon can completely disappear. A prime example is optimizing the truss design for suspension bridges. The Tacoma Narrows bridge was the first of its kind that was optimized to divert the wind above and below the roadbed [1]. Only a few months after its opening in 1940, it collapsed due to moderate winds which caused twisting vibrational modes. In another example, Ben-Tal and Nemirovski demonstrated that only 5% errors can entirely destroy the radiation characteristics of an otherwise optimized phased locked and impedance matched array of antennas [2]. Therefore, taking errors into account during the optimization process is a first-order effect.
Traditionally, sensitivity analysis was performed to study the impact of perturbations on specific designs and to find solutions that are least sensitive among a larger set of optima.
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Optimal Device Design , pp. 149 - 188Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
, Design Paradigms, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-Tal and , Robust optimization — methodology and applications, Mathematical Programming 92, 453–480 (2002).Google Scholar
and , Introduction to Stochastic Programming, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, 1997.Google Scholar
, , , and , Robust design — an overview, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal 44, 181–191 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , A robust optimization approach using Taguchi's loss function for solving nonlinear optimization problems, Advances in Design Automation 32, 241–248 (1991).Google Scholar
and , Conditional Value-at-risk: Optimization Approach, vol. 54 of Applied Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishing, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001.Google Scholar
and , A new scenario decomposition method for large-scale stochastic optimization, Operations Research 43, 477–490 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Scenarios and policy aggregation in optimization under uncertainty, Mathematics of Operations Research 16, 119–147 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Computational complexity of stochastic programming problems, Mathematical Programming 106, 423–432 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, On tractable approximations of randomly perturbed convex constraints, Proceedings, 42nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 3, 2419–2422 (2003).Google Scholar
and , Robust design of structures using optimization methods, Computational Methods in Applied Mechanical Engineering 193, 2221–2237 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Robust optimization considering tolerances of design variables, Computers and Structures 79, 77–86 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Robust convex optimization, Mathematics of Operations Research 23, 769–805 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Robust discrete optimization and network flows, Mathematical Programming 98, 49–71 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Tractable approximations to robust conic optimization problems, Mathematical Programming 107, 5–36 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , An interior point algorithm for computing saddle points of constrained continuous minimax, Annals of Operations Research 99, 59–77 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , An approximation technique for robust nonlinear optimization, Mathematical Programming, Ser. B 107, 213–230 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, General robust-optimization formulation for nonlinear programming, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 132, 111–124 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and , Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 2007.Google Scholar
,, and , Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 23, 1–13 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and , Metamodels for computerbased engineering design: Survey and recommendations., Engineering with Computers 17, 129–150 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Robust optimization using computer experiments, European Journal of Operational Research 191, 816–83 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , Robust optimization for unconstrained simulation-based problems, Operations Research, accepted for publication (2008).Google Scholar
, , and K. , Robust optimization in electromagnetic scattering problems, Journal of Applied Physics 101, 074507 1–7 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , Aperiodic nanophotonic design, Journal of Applied Physics 95, 1420–1426 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and , Optimization of aperiodic dielectric structures, Journal of Applied Physics 100, 034310 1–6 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and , Performance of an anisotropic artificial absorber for truncating finite-element meshes, IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation 44, 975–982 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Three-dimensional perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves, Journal of Computational Physics 127, 363–379 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and , Chirped multilayer coatings for broadband dispersion control in femtosecond lasers, Optics Letters 19, 201–203 (1994).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al., Design and fabrication of double-chirped mirrors, Optics Letters 22, 831–833 (1997).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and , Theory of double-chirped mirrors, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 4, 197–208 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al., Ultrabroadband double-chirped mirror pairs for generation of octave spectra, Journal of the Optical Society of America B18, 882–885 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Deposition error compensation for optical multilayer coating: I. theoretical description, Applied Optics 31, 3821–3835 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , et al., 1.5-octave chirped mirror for pulse compression down to sub-3 fs, Applied Optics 87, 5–12 (2007).Google Scholar
and , Optimization of chirped mirrors, Applied Optics 41, 6514–6520 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and , Efficient analytic computation of dispersion from multilayer structures, Applied Optics 45, 1478–1483 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and , Efficient optimization of multilayer coatings for ultrafast optics using analytic gradients of dispersion, Applied Optics 46, 2656–2662 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , , et al., Self-referenced 200 MHz octave-spanning Ti:saphhire laser with 50 attosecond carrier-envelope phase jitter, Optics Express 13, 5163–5169 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, Fourier transform technique with refinement in the frequency domain for the synthesis of optical thin films, Applied Optics 35, 5148–5154 (1996).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, , and , Applications of the needle optimization technique to the design of optical coatings, Applied Optics 35, 5493–5508 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , Nonconvex robust optimization for problems with constraints, INFORMS Journal on Computing, accepted for publication (2008).Google Scholar
, Robust global optimization with polynomials, Mathematical Programming 107, 275–293 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Gloptipoly: Global optimization over polynomials with Matlab and SeDuMi, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 29, 165–194 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Sums of Squares Relaxations of Polynomial Semidefinite Programs, Mathematical and Computing Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 152–8552 (2003).Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.