Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Silverman, Eric and Bryden, John 2018. Methodological Investigations in Agent-Based Modelling. p. 85.

    Schutte, Sebastian 2017. Violence and Civilian Loyalties. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 61, Issue. 8, p. 1595.

    Schutte, Sebastian 2017. Geographic determinants of indiscriminate violence in civil wars. Conflict Management and Peace Science, Vol. 34, Issue. 4, p. 380.

    Schutte, Sebastian 2015. Geography, Outcome, and Casualties. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 59, Issue. 6, p. 1101.

    Rutherford, Alex Harmon, Dion Werfel, Justin Gard-Murray, Alexander S. Bar-Yam, Shlomiya Gros, Andreas Xulvi-Brunet, Ramon Bar-Yam, Yaneer and Gomez-Gardenes, Jesus 2014. Good Fences: The Importance of Setting Boundaries for Peaceful Coexistence. PLoS ONE, Vol. 9, Issue. 5, p. e95660.

    Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher Bakke, Kristin M. Seymour, Lee J. M. Pearlman, Wendy and Cunningham, Kathleen Gallagher 2012. Shirts Today, Skins Tomorrow. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 56, Issue. 1, p. 67.

    Buhaug, Halvard Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede Holtermann, Helge Østby, Gudrun and Tollefsen, Andreas Forø 2011. It’s the Local Economy, Stupid! Geographic Wealth Dispersion and Conflict Outbreak Location. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 55, Issue. 5, p. 814.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: July 2010

10 - Articulating the geo-cultural logic of nationalist insurgency

Summary

Introduction

As interstate wars become less frequent, academic attention has increasingly shifted to internal conflict. In recent years, an exciting literature on the determinants of civil wars has emerged. Political economists, relying on cross-national statistics and rational-choice modeling, have played a prominent role in this debate. In contrast to most past attempts to account for domestic unrest, they tend to explain outbreaks of civil wars in materialist and logistical, rather than cultural, terms.

There can be no doubt that this kind of analysis has advanced the research frontier considerably. Instead of offering sweeping generalizations based on diffuse and scattered case-study evidence, the political economy literature has brought the phenomenon of civil conflict into sharper focus, thus allowing for a more precise evaluation of competing hypotheses. Still, it would be premature to draw definitive theoretical conclusions from these studies because a considerable gap remains between their macro-level findings and the rationalistic micro-level mechanisms that they posit as explanations.

Questioning these scholars' heavy reliance on materialist factors, this essay proposes alternative causal mechanisms that bring both politics and culture back to the fore. This task calls for deeper and more systemic explanations than those associated with the standard methods and assumptions of microeconomics. Therefore, I rely on computational modeling, which is better suited to trace historical path-dependency and to capture intangible entities such as national identities.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Order, Conflict, and Violence
  • Online ISBN: 9780511755903
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755903
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton University Press.
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1963. Conflict and Defense. New York: Harper & Row.
Braudel, Fernand. 1980. On History, trans. Matthews, S.. University of Chicago Press.
Bremer, Stuart A., and Mihalka, Michael. 1977. “Machiavelli in Machina: Or Politics among Hexagons.” In Problems of World Modeling, ed. Deutsch, K.W.. Boston: Ballinger.
Buhaug, Halvard, and Gates, Scott. 2002. “The Geography of Civil Wars.” Journal of Peace Research 39 (4): 417–433.
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 1997. Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve. Princeton University Press.
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2002a. “Endogenizing Geopolitical Boundaries with Agent-Based Modeling.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 (suppl. 3): 7296–7303.
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2002b. “Nationalism and Ethnicity.” In The Handbook of International Relations, ed. Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T., and Simmons, B.. London: Sage, 409–428.
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2003. “Modeling the Size of Wars: From Billiard Balls to Sandpiles.” American Political Science Review 1 (97): 135–150.
Cederman, Lars-Erik. 2005. “Computational Models of Social Forms: Advancing Process Theory.” American Journal of Sociology 110 (4): 864–893.
Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Girardin, Luc. 2007. “Beyond Fractionalization: Mapping Ethnicity onto Nationalist Insurgencies.” American Political Science Review 101 (1): 173–185.
Cederman, Lars-Erik, Ketil Rød, Jan, and Weidmann, Nils. 2006. “Geo-Referencing of Ethnic Groups: Creating a New Dataset.” Paper presented at a GROW-Net Workshop, Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO), February 10–11.
Collier, Paul, and Hoeffler, Anke. 2004. “Greed and Grievance in Civil Wars.” Oxford Economic Papers 56 (October): 563–595.
Collier, Paul, and Sambanis, Nicholas, eds. 2005. Understanding Civil War: Evidence and Analysis. Washington DC: The World Bank.
Deutsch, Karl W. 1953. Nationalism and Social Communication: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Epstein, Joshua M. 2002. “Modeling Civil Violence: An Agent-Based Computational Approach.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99 (suppl. 3): 7243–7250.
Fearon, James D. 2003. “Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country.” Journal of Economic Growth 8: 195–222.
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 2000. “Violence and the Social Construction of Ethnic Identity.” International Organization 54 (4): 845–877.
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97 (1): 75–90.
Gates, Scott. 2002. “Recruitment and Allegiance: The Microfoundations of Rebellion.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (1): 111–130.
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter, Wallensteen, Peter, Eriksson, Mikael, Sollenberg, Margareta, and Strand, Håvard. 2002. “Armed Conflict 1946–2001: A New Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 39 (5): 615–637.
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1993. Minorities at Risk: A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Hannan, Michael T. 1979. “The Dynamics of Ethnic Boundaries in Modern States.” In National Development and the World System, ed. Meyer, J.W. and Hannan, M.T.. University of Chicago Press, 253–275.
Hechter, Michael. 1992. “The Dynamics of Secession.” Acta Sociologica 35 (4): 267–283.
Herbst, Jeffrey. 1989. “The Creation and Maintenance of National Boundaries in Africa.” International Organization 43 (4): 673–692.
Holland, John H. 1995. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2003. “The Ontology of ‘Political Violence’: Action and Identity in Civil Wars.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (3): 475–494.
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil Wars. Cambridge University Press.
Lake, David A. 2003. “International Relations Theory and Internal Conflict: Insights from the Interstices.” International Studies Review 5 (4): 81–89.
Lustick, Ian S. 2000. “Agent-Based Modeling of Collective Identity: Testing Constructivist Theory.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 3 (1).
Lustick, Ian S. 2002. “PS-I: A User-Friendly Agent-Based Modeling Platform for Testing Theories of Political Identity and Political Stability.” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5 (3).
McAdam, Doug, Sidney, Tarrow, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge University Press.
Quinn, Kevin, Hechter, Michael, and Wibbels, Erik. 2004. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War Revisited.” Center for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington.
Rokkan, Stein. 1999. State Formation, Nation-Building, and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan, ed. Flora, Peter. Oxford University Press.
Sambanis, Nicholas. 2001. “Do Ethnic and Nonethnic Civil Wars Have the Same Causes? A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (3): 259–282.
Sambanis, Nicholas. 2004. “Using Case Studies to Expand Economic Models of Civil War.” Perspectives on Politics 2: 259–279.
Simon, Herbert. 1981. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tarrow, Sidney. 2007. “Inside Insurgencies: Politics and Violence in an Age of Civil War.” Perspectives on Politics 5 (3): 587–600.
Tilly, Charles. 2003. The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge University Press.
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Weiner, Myron. 1971. “The Macedonian Syndrome: An Historical Model of International Relations and Political Development.” World Politics 23 (4): 665–683.
Weiner, Myron. 1978. Sons of the Soil: Migration and Ethnic Conflict in India. Princeton University Press.