Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Senn, Martin and Troy, Jodok 2017. The transformation of targeted killing and international order. Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 175.

    Brown, Graham K. and Langer, Arnim 2016. A General Class of Social Distance Measures. Political Analysis, Vol. 24, Issue. 02, p. 211.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: July 2010

1 - Introduction: integrating the study of order, conflict, and violence

Summary

There might appear to be little that binds the study of order and the study of violence and conflict. Bloodshed in its multiple forms – interstate war, civil conflict, crime – is often seen as something separate from, and almost unrelated to, the domains of “normal” politics that constitute what we think of as order. Students of political, social, and economic institutions simply assume that violence is absent and order established, never considering that the maintenance of such institutions might involve the ongoing management of conflict and the more or less direct threat of violence. Likewise, students of violence and conflict tend to focus on places and periods in which order has collapsed, rarely considering how violence is used to create order at the national and local levels, maintain it, and uphold it in the face of challenges. In Charles Tilly's (1975, 42) famous formulation: war makes states. Clearly, order is necessary for managing violence as much as the threat of violence is crucial in cementing order.

Yet the question of how order emerges and how it is sustained is but the flip side of understanding the dynamics of conflict. On the one hand, order requires the active taming of conflict. However, this is often impossible without an actual or threatened recourse to violence. In game-theoretic language, violence is off the equilibrium path of order. On the other hand, violent conflict entails the successful contestation of existing order, and its collapse.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Order, Conflict, and Violence
  • Online ISBN: 9780511755903
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755903
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×
References
Figueiredo, Rui J. P., and Weingast, Barry. 1999. “The Rationality of Fear: Political Opportunism and Ethnic Conflict.” In Civil Wars, Insecurity, and Intervention, ed. Walter, Barbara and Snyder, Jack. New York: Columbia University Press.
Olson, Mancur, Jr. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Olson, Mancur, Jr. 1993. “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development.” American Political Science Review 87: 567–576.
Tilly, Charles. 1975. “Reflections on the History of European State-Making.” In The Formation of National States in Western Europe, ed. Tilly, Charles. Princeton University Press.