Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:33:17.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Peripherality, participation and communities of practice: examining the patient in dental training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2010

Nick Llewellyn
Affiliation:
University of Warwick
Jon Hindmarsh
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The concept of ‘communities of practice’ (CoP) has gained significant purchase in the study of learning within and between organisations since it was originally introduced by Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger (1991) and subsequently elaborated by Wenger (1998). The concept is bound up with a thoroughly social theory of learning that emphasises the inherently collective and participative character of becoming skilled in an occupation, a profession or indeed any activity in everyday life. A CoP involves members engaging in joint enterprise who inevitably develop a shared repertoire of skills, norms and competencies. Learning is then seen in terms of centripetal movement and shifting identity from peripheral (novice) to central participation (expert) within a particular community of practice.

The development of the concept was grounded in a series of ethnographic studies of apprenticeship, but as Ash Amin and Joanne Roberts (2008) and others (e.g. Cox 2005) argue, it is increasingly engaging a more formal, indeed managerialist, agenda:

As CoPs thinking proliferates, the original emphasis on context, process, social interaction, material practices, ambiguity, disagreement – in short the frequently idiosyncratic and always performative nature of learning – is being lost to formulaic distillations of the workings of CoPs and instrumentalist applications seeking to maximise learning and knowing through CoPs.

(Amin and Roberts 2008: 353–4)

Indeed CoPs are now often positioned as knowledge management ‘tools’ (Roberts 2006) which draws debate and discussion to consider the character of ‘communities’ and how they can be fostered.

Type
Chapter
Information
Organisation, Interaction and Practice
Studies of Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis
, pp. 218 - 240
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×