Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 156
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Scharenborg, Odette Kakouros, Sofoklis Post, Brechtje and Meunier, Fanny 2019. Cross-linguistic Influences on Sentence Accent Detection in Background Noise. Language and Speech, p. 002383091881957.

    Borleffs, Elisabeth Maassen, Ben A. M. Lyytinen, Heikki and Zwarts, Frans 2019. Cracking the Code: The Impact of Orthographic Transparency and Morphological-Syllabic Complexity on Reading and Developmental Dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, Issue. ,

    Jacobs, Arthur M. 2018. The Gutenberg English Poetry Corpus: Exemplary Quantitative Narrative Analyses. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, Vol. 5, Issue. ,

    Keffala, Bethany Barlow, Jessica A. and Rose, Sharon 2018. Interaction in Spanish–English bilinguals’ acquisition of syllable structure. International Journal of Bilingualism, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 16.

    de Kok, Kenneth Botma, Bert and van 't Veer, Marijn 2018. Glides and laryngeals as a structural class. Linguistics in the Netherlands, Vol. 35, Issue. , p. 51.

    van der Hulst, Harry and van de Weijer, Jeroen 2018. Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson. Vol. 204, Issue. , p. 385.

    Trecca, Fabio McCauley, Stewart M. Andersen, Sofie Riis Bleses, Dorthe Basbøll, Hans Højen, Anders Madsen, Thomas O. Ribu, Ingeborg Sophie Bjønness and Christiansen, Morten H. 2018. Segmentation of Highly Vocalic Speech Via Statistical Learning: Initial Results From Danish, Norwegian, and English. Language Learning,

    Jacobs, Arthur M. and Kinder, Annette 2018. What makes a metaphor literary? Answers from two computational studies. Metaphor and Symbol, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 85.

    Polo, Nuria 2018. Acquisition of codas in Spanish as a first language: The role of accuracy, markedness and frequency. First Language, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    Cohn, Abigail C. and Kurniawan, Ferdinan Okki 2018. Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics. Vol. 250, Issue. , p. 343.

    Santiago, Fabian 2018. Review of Yavaʂ, Mehmet, Margaret Kehoe & Walcir Cardoso, eds. (2017) Romance-Germanic Bilingual Phonology . Language, Interaction and Acquisition. Langage, Interaction et Acquisition, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 311.

    Navarro, Sylvain 2018. Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson. Vol. 204, Issue. , p. 339.

    Yavaș, Mehmet Fox-Boyer, Annette and Schaefer, Blanca 2018. Patterns in German /ʃC/-cluster acquisition. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, Vol. 32, Issue. 10, p. 913.

    Aryani, Arash Conrad, Markus Schmidtke, David Jacobs, Arthur and Manalo, Emmanuel 2018. Why 'piss' is ruder than 'pee'? The role of sound in affective meaning making. PLOS ONE, Vol. 13, Issue. 6, p. e0198430.

    Cui, Gang and Zhong, Xiaoyun 2018. Adaptation in aphasia: revisiting language evidence. Aphasiology, Vol. 32, Issue. 8, p. 855.

    Scharinger, Mathias 2017. Beyond Markedness in Formal Phonology. Vol. 241, Issue. , p. 191.

    Shuster, Victoria P. and Miozzo, Michele 2017. A selective morpho-phonological deficit?. Cognitive Neuropsychology, Vol. 34, Issue. 1-2, p. 52.

    Yildiz, Yasemin 2017. Explaining the orthography–phonology interface in written corpora: an Optimality–Theoretic approach. Corpora, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 181.

    Faes, Jolien and Gillis, Steven 2017. Consonant cluster production in children with cochlear implants: A comparison with normally hearing peers. First Language, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 319.

    Sanoudaki, Eirini 2017. Sonic Signatures. Vol. 14, Issue. , p. 190.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1990
  • Online publication date: February 2010

17 - The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification

Summary

Introduction

One of the major concerns of laboratory phonology is that of determining the nature of the transition between discrete phonological structure (conventionally, “phonology”) and its expression in terms of nondiscrete physical or psychoacoustic parameters (conventionally, “phonetics”). A considerable amount of research has been devoted to determining where this transition lies, and to what extent the rule types and representational systems needed to characterize the two levels may differ (see Keating 1985 for an overview). For instance, it is an empirical question to what extent the assignment of phonetic parameters to strings of segments (phonemes, tones, etc.) depends upon increasingly rich representational structures of the sort provided by autosegmental and metrical phonology, or upon real-time realization rules – or indeed upon some combination of the two, as many are coming to believe. We are only beginning to assess the types of evidence that can decide questions of this sort, and a complete and fully adequate theory of the phonetics/phonology interface remains to be worked out. A new synthesis of the methodology of phonology and phonetics, integrating results from the physical, biological and cognitive sciences, is required if we are to make significant progress in this area.

The present study examines one question of traditional interest to both phoneticians and phonologists, with roots that go deep into modern linguistic theory. Many linguists have noted the existence of cross-linguistic preferences for certain types of syllable structures and syllable contacts. These have been the subject of descriptive studies and surveys such as that of Greenberg (1978), which have brought to light a number of generalizations suggesting that certain syllable types are less complex or less marked than others across languages.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Papers in Laboratory Phonology
  • Online ISBN: 9780511627736
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627736
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×