Albornoz, M. M., ‘Choice of Law in International Contracts in Latin American Legal Systems’ (2010) 6 Journal of Private International Law 23Google Scholar

Albornoz, M. M. and González Martín, N., ‘Towards the Uniform Application of Party Autonomy for Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts’ (2016) 12 Journal of Private International Law 437Google Scholar

Ancel, M. E., Marion, L., and Wynaendts, L., ‘Reflections on One-Sided Jurisdiction Clauses in International Litigation’ (2013) 148 Banque & Droit 3. English version available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2258419Google Scholar

Andrews, N., ‘Strangers to Justice No Longer: The Reversal of the Privity Rule under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999’ (2001) 60 Cambridge Law Journal 353Google Scholar

Anon, , ‘Note: Recent International Agreement’ (2005) 119 Harvard Law Review 931Google Scholar

Arzandeh, A., ‘The Law Governing Arbitration Agreements in England’ [2013] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 31Google Scholar

Atrill, S., ‘Choice of Law in Contract: The Missing Pieces of the Article 4 Jigsaw?’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audit, B., La Fraude à la Loi (Dalloz, 1974)Google Scholar

Austin, J., The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (J. Murray, 1832)Google Scholar

Ballarino, T., ‘From Centros to Überseering: EC Right of Establishment and the Conflict of Laws’ (2002) 4 Yearbook of Private International Law 203Google Scholar

Bantekas, I., ‘The Foundations of Arbitrability in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2008) 27 Australian Year Book of International Law 193Google Scholar

Barcelo, J. J. III, ‘International Commercial Arbitration – Who Decides the Arbitrators’ Jurisdiction? Separability and Competence-Competence in Transnational Perspective’ (2003) 36 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1115Google Scholar

Baron, G., ‘Do the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts Form a New Lex Mercatoria?’ (1999) 15 Arbitration International 115Google Scholar

Basedow, J., ‘The Communitarization of the Conflict of Laws under the Treaty of Amsterdam’ (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review 687CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basedow, J., ‘The Law of Open Societies – Private Ordering and Public Regulation of International Relations’ (2013) 360 Recueil des Cours 9Google Scholar

Basedow, J., ‘Exclusive Choice-of-Court Agreements as a Derogation from Imperative Norms’, in Lindskoug, P. et al. (eds.), Essays in Honour of Michael Bogdan (Juristförlaget, 2013)Google Scholar

Basedow, J., ‘The Hague Principles on Choice of Law: their addressees and impact’ (2017) 22 Uniform Law Review 304Google Scholar

Basedow, J., Rühl, G., Ferrari, F., and de Miguel Asensio, P. (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Private International Law (Edward Elgar, 2017)Google Scholar

Bath, V., ‘Overlapping Jurisdictions and the Resolution of Disputes Before Chinese and Foreign Courts’ (2015–16) 17 Yearbook of Private International Law 111Google Scholar

Baxter, W., ‘Choice of Law and the Federal System’ (1963) 16 Stanford Law Review 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beale, J. H., ‘Book Review: Dicey's “Confict of Laws”’ (1896) 10 Harvard Law Review 168CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beale, J. H., ‘What Law Governs the Validity of a Contract. I’ (1909) 23 Harvard Law Review 1Google Scholar

Beale, J. H., ‘What Law Governs the Validity of a Contract. II. The Present Condition of the Authorities’ (1909) 23 Harvard Law Review 79Google Scholar

Beale, J. H., ‘What Law Governs the Validity of a Contract. II. The Present Condition of the Authorities [Continued]’ (1910) 23 Harvard Law Review 194Google Scholar

Beale, J. H., ‘What Law Governs the Validity of a Contract. III. Theoretical and Practical Criticisms of the Authorities’ (1910) 23 Harvard Law Review 260CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beale, J. H., Bartolus on the Conflict of Laws (Harvard University Press, 1914)Google Scholar

Beale, J. H., A Treatise on the Conflict of Laws (Baker Voorhis and Co., 1935)Google Scholar

Beaumont, P., ‘Hague Choice of Court Agreements Convention 2005: Background, Negotiations, Analysis and Current Status’ (2009) 5 Journal of Private International Law 125Google Scholar

Beck, A., ‘Floating Choice of Law Clauses’ [1987] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 523Google Scholar

Bell, A., Forum Shopping and Venue in Transnational Litigation (Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar

Bennett, T. W., ‘Choice of Law Rules in Claims of Unjust Enrichment’ (1990) 39 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 136CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berger, K. P., The Creeping Codification of the New Lex Mercatoria (Kluwer, 2nd edn, 2010)Google Scholar

Bergson, I., ‘A New Frontier for Brussels I – Private Law Remedies for Breach of the Regulation?’ (2017) 13 Journal of Private International Law 365Google Scholar

Berman, P. S., Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law Beyond Borders (Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Bermann, G. A., ‘The Use of Anti-suit Injunctions in International Litigation’ (1990) 28 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 589Google Scholar

Bermann, G. A., (ed.), Party Autonomy: Constitutional and International Law Limits in Comparative Perspective (Juris, 2005)Google Scholar

Bermann, G. A., ‘The Supreme Court Trilogy and Its Impact on U.S. Arbitration Law’ (2011) 22 American Review of International Arbitration 551Google Scholar

Bermann, G. A., ‘The “Gateway” Problem in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2012) 37 Yale Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Bermann, G. A., ‘Arbitration and Private International Law’ (2015) 381 Recueil des Cours 41Google Scholar

Bermann, G. A., ‘“International Standards” as a Choice of Law Option in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2016) 27 American Review of International Arbitration 423Google Scholar

Bermann, G. A. and Mistelis, L. (eds.), Mandatory Rules in International Arbitration (Juris, 2011)Google Scholar

Bisping, C., ‘Avoid the Statutist Trap: The International Scope of the Consumer Credit Act 1974’ (2012) 8 Journal of Private International Law 35Google Scholar

Black, V. and Pitel, S. G. A., ‘Forum-Selection Clauses: Beyond the Contracting Parties’ (2016) 12 Journal of Private International Law 26Google Scholar

Blessing, M., ‘Mandatory Rules of Law versus Party Autonomy in International Arbitration’ (1997) 14 Journal of International Arbitration 23Google Scholar

Blom, J., ‘Private International Law in a Globalizing Age: The Quiet Canadian Revolution’ (2002) 4 Yearbook of Private International Law 83Google Scholar

Boele-Woelki, K., ‘For Better or for Worse: The Europeanization of International Divorce Law’ (2010) 12 Yearbook of Private International Law 1Google Scholar

Boele-Woelki, K., ‘Party Autonomy in Litigation and Arbitration in View of the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts’ (2016) 379 Recueil des Cours 35Google Scholar

Bonell, M. J., An International Restatement of Contract Law: The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (Brill, 3rd edn, 2005)Google Scholar

Bonomi, A., ‘Article 7(1) of the European Contracts Convention: Codifying the Practice of Applying Foreign Mandatory Rules’ (2001) 114 Harvard Law Review 2462Google Scholar

Bonomi, A., ‘Overriding Mandatory Provisions in the Rome I Regulation on the Law Applicable to Contracts’ (2008) 10 Yearbook of Private International Law 285Google Scholar

Borchers, P. J., ‘Forum Selection Agreements in the Federal Courts after Carnival Cruise’ (1992) 67 Washington Law Review 55Google Scholar

Borchers, P. J., ‘Categorical Exceptions to Party Autonomy in Private International Law’ (2008) 82 Tulane Law Review 1645Google Scholar

Born, G. International Commercial Arbitration (Kluwer Law International, 2nd edn, 2014)Google Scholar

Born, G. and Šćekić, M., ‘Pre-Arbitration Procedural Requirements: ‘A Dismal Swamp”, in Caron, D., Schill, S., Cohen Smutny, A., and Triantafilou, E. (eds.), Practising Virtue: Inside International Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Brand, R. A., ‘Forum Selection and Forum Rejection in US Courts’, in Fawcett, J. (ed.), Reform and Development of Private International Law (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Brand, R. A., ‘The Rome I Regulation Rules on Party Autonomy for Choice of Law: A US Perspective’ (2011) University of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 2011–29, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1973162Google Scholar

Brand, R. A., ‘Transaction Planning Using Rules on Jurisdiction and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments’ (2013) 358 Recueil des Cours 9Google Scholar

Brand, R. A., ‘Implementing the 2005 Hague Convention: The EU Magnet and the US Centrifuge’, in Forner Delaygua, J., González Beilfuss, C. and Viñas i Farré, R. (eds.), Entre Bruselas y La Haya, Estudios sobre la unificación internacional y regional del derecho internacional privado: Liber Amicorum Alegría Borrás (Marcial Pons, 2013), available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2288708Google Scholar

Brand, R. A. and Herrup, P., The 2005 Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: Commentary and Documents (Cambridge University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Brekoulakis, S., ‘The Notion of the Superiority of Arbitration Agreements over Jurisdiction Agreements’ (2007) 24 Journal of International Arbitration 341Google Scholar

Brekoulakis, S., Third Parties in International Commercial Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Brekoulakis, S., ‘International Arbitration Scholarship and the Concept of Arbitration Law’ (2013) 36 Fordham International Law Journal 745Google Scholar

Brekoulakis, S., ‘Rethinking Consent in International Commercial Arbitration: A General Theory for Non-signatories’ (2017) 8 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 610Google Scholar

Brekoulakis, S. and Devaney, M. M., ‘Public-Private Arbitration and the Public Interest under English Law’ (2017) 80 Modern Law Review 22Google Scholar

Bridgeman, J., ‘The Arbitrability of Competition Law Disputes’ (2008) 19 European Business Law Review 147Google Scholar

Briggs, A., ‘The Validity of “Floating” Choice of Law and Jurisdiction Agreements’ [1986] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 508Google Scholar

Briggs, A., ‘Anti-suit Injunctions and Utopian Ideals’ (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review 529Google Scholar

Briggs, A., ‘The Death of Harrods: Forum Non Conveniens and the European Court’ (2005) 121 Law Quarterly Review 535Google Scholar

Briggs, A., ‘Decisions of British Courts During 2006: B. Private International Law’ (2007) 78 British Yearbook of International Law 615Google Scholar

Briggs, A., Agreements On Jurisdiction and Choice of Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Briggs, A., ‘The Subtle Variety of Jurisdiction Agreements’ [2012] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 364Google Scholar

Briggs, A., ‘One-Sided Jurisdiction Clauses: French Folly and Russian Menace’ [2013] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 137Google Scholar

Briggs, A., ‘The Nature or Natures of Agreements on Choice of Court and Choice of Law’ (2016) ASIL Webinar paper, available at www.asil.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/Which%20Law%20Governs%20Forum%20Selection%20Clauses.pdfGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brilmayer, L., ‘Rights, Fairness, and Choice of Law’ (1989) 98 Yale Law Journal 1277Google Scholar

Burge, M. E., ‘Too Clever By Half: Reflections on Perception, Legitimacy, and Choice of Law Under Revised Article 1 of the Uniform Commercial Code’ (2015) 6 William and Mary Business Law Review 357Google Scholar

Burger, D. C., ‘Transnational Public Policy as a Factor in Choice of Law Analysis’ (1984) 5 New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law 370Google Scholar

Buxbaum, H. L., ‘Forum Selection in International Contract Litigation: The Role of Judicial Discretion’ (2004) 12 Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution 185Google Scholar

Buxbaum, H. L., ‘Determining the Territorial Scope of State Law in Interstate and International Conflicts: Comments on the Draft Restatement (Third) and on the Role of Party Autonomy’ (2017) 27 Duke Journal of International and Comparative Law 381Google Scholar

Buys, C. G., ‘The Arbitrators’ Duty to Respect the Parties’ Choice of Law in Commercial Arbitration’ (2012) 79 St. John's Law Review 59Google Scholar

Camilleri, P., ‘Article 23: Formal Validity, Material Validity or Both?’ (2011) 7 Journal of Private International Law 297Google Scholar

Carbonneau, T. E. (ed.), Lex Mercatoria and Arbitration: A Discussion of the New Law Merchant (Kluwer, 1998)Google Scholar

Carbonneau, T. E., ‘Liberal Rules of Arbitrability and the Autonomy of Labor Arbitration in the United States’, in Mistelis, L. A. and Brekoulakis, S. L. (eds.), Arbitrability: International and Comparative Perspectives (Kluwer Law International, 2009)Google Scholar

Carlston, K. S., ‘Theory of Arbitration Process’ (1952) 17 Law and Contemporary Problems 631Google Scholar

Carruthers, J. M., The Transfer of Property in the Conflict of Laws (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Carruthers, J. M., ‘Party Autonomy in the Legal Regulation of Adult Relationships: What Place for Party Choice in Private International Law?’ (2012) 61 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 881Google Scholar

Carruthers, J. M. and Crawford, E. B., ‘Variations on a Theme of Rome II: Reflections on Proposed Choice of Law Rules for Non-Contractual Obligations’ (2005) 9 Edinburgh Law Review 65Google Scholar

Chan, F. W. H., ‘Anti-suit Injunctions and the Doctrine of Comity’ (2016) 79 Modern Law Review 341Google Scholar

Chen, T. P., ‘Private International Law of the People's Republic of China: An Overview’ (1987) 35 American Journal of Comparative Law 445Google Scholar

Cheng, T. H., ‘New Tools for an Old Quest: A Commentary on Jan Kleinheisterkamp, the Impact of International Mandatory Laws on the Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements’ (2009) 3 World Arbitration and Mediation Review 121Google Scholar

Torremans, P. et al., Cheshire, North and Fawcett's Private International Law (Oxford University Press, 15th edn, 2017)Google Scholar

Chong, A., ‘The Common Law Choice of Law Rules for Resulting and Constructive Trusts’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law 855Google Scholar

Chong, A., ‘The Public Policy and Mandatory Rules of Third Countries in International Contracts’ (2006) 2 Journal of Private International Law 27Google Scholar

Chong, A., ‘Choice of Law for Unjust Enrichment/Restitution and the Rome II Regulation’ (2008) 57 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 863Google Scholar

Hill, J. and Shúilleabháin, M. N., Clarkson & Hill's Conflict of Laws (Oxford University Press, 5th edn, 2016)Google Scholar

Clermont, K. M., ‘Governing Law on Forum-Selection Agreements’ (2015) 66 Hastings Law Journal 643Google Scholar

Cole, S. R., ‘Uniform Arbitration: “One Size Fits All” Does Not Fit’ (2001) 16 Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 759Google Scholar

Collins, L., ‘Contractual Obligations – The EEC Preliminary Draft Convention on Private International Law’ (1976) 25 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 35Google Scholar

Cordero-Moss, G., ‘Limitations on Party Autonomy in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2014) 372 Recueil des Cours 131Google Scholar

Coyle, J. F., ‘Rethinking the Commercial Law Treaty’ (2011) 45 Georgia Law Review 343Google Scholar

Coyle, J. F., ‘The Canons of Construction for Choice-of-Law Clauses’ (2017) 92 Washington Law Review 631Google Scholar

Croff, C., ‘The Applicable Law in an International Commercial Arbitration: Is It Still a Conflict of Laws Problem?’ (1982) 16 International Lawyer 613Google Scholar

Cuniberti, G., ‘Forum Non Conveniens and the Brussels Convention’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 973Google Scholar

Cuniberti, G., ‘Beyond Contract – The Case for Default Arbitration in International Commercial Disputes’ (2008) 32 Fordham International Law Journal 417Google Scholar

Cuniberti, G., ‘Three Theories of Lex Mercatoria’ (2013) 52 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 369Google Scholar

Cuniberti, G., ‘The International Market for Contracts: The Most Attractive Contract Laws’ (2014) 34 Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 455Google Scholar

Currie, B., Selected Essays on the Conflict of Laws (Duke University Press, 1963)Google Scholar

Cutler, M. R., ‘Comparative Conflict of Laws: Effectiveness of Contractual Choice of Forum’ (1985) 20 Texas International Law Journal 97Google Scholar

Danov, M., ‘The Law Governing Arbitrability under the Arbitration Act 1996’ [2008] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 536Google Scholar

de Aguilar Vieira, I., ‘The CISG and Party Autonomy in Brazilian International Contract Law’ (2013) 1 Panorama of Brazilian Law 173Google Scholar

de Araujo, N., ‘Recent Developments and Current Trends on Brazilian Private International Law Concerning International Contracts’ (2013) 1 Panorama of Brazilian Law 73Google Scholar

de Boer, T. M., ‘Party Autonomy and Its Limitations in the Rome II Regulation’ (2007) 9 Yearbook of Private International Law 19Google Scholar

de By, R. A., ‘Note: Forum Selection Clauses: Substantive or Procedural for Erie Purposes’ (1989) 89 Columbia Law Review 1068Google Scholar

de la Feria, R. and Vogenauer, S. (eds.), Prohibition of Abuse of Law: A New General Principle of EU Law? (Hart, 2011)Google Scholar

de la Torre, J., ‘The Hague Choice of Court Convention and Federal Power over State Courts’ (2013) 45 Georgetown Journal of International Law 219Google Scholar

Dempegiotis, S., ‘EC Competition Law and International Arbitration in the Light of EC Regulation 1/2003’ (2008) 25 Journal of International Arbitration 365Google Scholar

Dessemontet, F., ‘Emerging Issues in International Arbitration: The Application of Soft Law, Halakha and Sharia by International Arbitral Tribunals’ (2012) 23 American Review of International Arbitration 545Google Scholar

De Vareilles-Sommières, P., ‘Notes on an Unstable Couple: Party Autonomy and Public Policy in the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts’ (2015–16) 17 Yearbook of Private International Law 49Google Scholar

Diamond, A. L., ‘Conflict of Laws in the EEC’ (1979) 32 Current Legal Problems 155Google Scholar

Dicey, A. V., A Digest of the Law of England with reference to the Conflict of Laws (Stevens and Sons, 1896)Google Scholar

Dicey, A. V. and Keith, A. B., A Digest of the Law of England with reference to the Conflict of Laws (Stevens and Sons, 3rd edn, 1922)Google Scholar

Dicey, A. V. and Morris, J. H. C., Dicey's Conflict of Laws (Stevens and Sons, 7th edn, 1958)Google Scholar

Collins, L. et al., Dicey, Morris and Collins on The Conflict of Laws (Sweet and Maxwell, 15th edn, 2012)Google Scholar

Dickinson, A., ‘Third Country Mandatory Rules in the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations – “So Long, Farewell, Auf Wiedersehen, Adieu?”’ (2007) 3 Journal of Private International Law 53Google Scholar

Dickinson, A., ‘Territory in the Rome I and II Regulations’ [2013] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 86Google Scholar

Dickinson, A., ‘Once Bitten – Mutual Distrust in European Private International Law’ (2015) 131 Law Quarterly Review 186Google Scholar

Dickinson, A., ‘Keeping up Appearances: The Development of Adjudicatory Jurisdiction in the English Courts’ (2017) 86 British Yearbook of International Law 6Google Scholar

Dickinson, A., ‘Oiling the Machine: Overriding Mandatory Provisions and Public Policy in the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts’ (2017) 22 Uniform Law Review 402Google Scholar

Dickinson, A., Keyes, M., and John, T. (eds.), Australian Private International Law for the 21st Century: Facing Outwards (Hart, 2014)Google Scholar

D'Oliveira, H. U. J., ‘Characteristic Obligation in the Draft EEC Obligation Convention’ (1977) 25 American Journal of Comparative Law 303Google Scholar

Dolinger, J., ‘World Public Policy – Real International Public Policy in the Conflict of Laws’ (1982) 17 Texas International Law Journal 167Google Scholar

Downie, C., ‘Will Australia Trust Arbitrators with Antitrust? – Examining the Challenges in International Antitrust Arbitrations to Develop a Competition Arbitration Model for Australia’ (2013) 30 Journal of International Arbitration 221Google Scholar

Draguiev, D., ‘Unilateral Jurisdiction Clauses: The Case for Invalidity, Severability or Enforceability’ (2014) 31 Journal of International Arbitration 19Google Scholar

Druzin, B., ‘Buying Commercial Law: Choice of Law, Choice of Forum, and Network Externalities’ (2009) 18 Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law 1Google Scholar

Duckworth, M., ‘Certainty or Justice? Bringing Choice of Law Rules for International Torts into the Modern Era’ (2002) 24 Sydney Law Review 569Google Scholar

Dutta, A., ‘Succession and Wills in the Conflict of Laws on the Eve of Europeanization’ (2009) 73 RabelsZ 547Google Scholar

Eidenmüller, H., ‘The Transnational Law Market, Regulatory Competition, and Transnational Corporations’ (2011) 18 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 707Google Scholar

Eidenmüller, H. (ed.), Regulatory Competition in Contract Law and Dispute Resolution (Beck/Hart, 2013)Google Scholar

Faulkner, T., Law and Authority in the Early Middle Ages (Cambridge University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Fawcett, J. J. and Torremans, P., Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 2011)Google Scholar

Fentiman, R., Foreign Law in English Courts (Oxford University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Fentiman, R., ‘Case C-116/02, Erich Gasser GmbH v. MISAT Srl’ (2005) 42 Common Market Law Review 241Google Scholar

Fentiman, R., ‘Laws, Foreign Laws and Facts’ (2006) 59 Current Legal Problems 391Google Scholar

Fentiman, R., ‘Civil Jurisdiction and Third States: Owusu and After’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 705Google Scholar

Fentiman, R., ‘Unilateral Jurisdiction Agreements in Europe’ (2013) 72 Cambridge Law Journal 24Google Scholar

Ferrario, P., ‘The Group of Companies Doctrine in International Commercial Arbitration: Is There Any Reason for This Doctrine to Exist?’ (2009) 26 Journal of International Arbitration 647Google Scholar

Force, R., ‘The Position in the United States on Foreign Forum Selection and Arbitration Clauses, Forum Non Conveniens, and Antisuit Injunctions’ (2011) 35 Tulane Journal of Maritime Law 401Google Scholar

Forsyth, C., ‘Characterisation Revisited: An Essay in the Theory and Practice of the English Conflict of Laws’ (1998) 114 Law Quarterly Review 141Google Scholar

Fortier, L. Y., ‘Arbitrability of Disputes’, in Aksen, G. et al. (eds.), Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner (ICC Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar

French, R., ‘Transnational Dispute Resolution’, speech delivered at Supreme and Federal Court Judges’ Conference, Brisbane, 25 January 2016. Available at www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/speeches/currentjustices/frenchcj/frenchcj25Jan2016.pdfGoogle Scholar

Gaillard, E., ‘The Enforcement of Awards Set Aside in the Country of Origin’ (1999) 14 ICSID Review 16Google Scholar

Gaillard, E., ‘Transnational Law: A Legal System or a Method of Decision-Making?’ (2000) 17 Arbitration International 59Google Scholar

Gaillard, E., Legal Theory of International Arbitration (Nijhoff, 2010)Google Scholar

Gaillard, E., ‘The Representations of International Arbitration’ (2010) 1 Journal of International Dispute Settlement 271CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gaillard, E. and Banifatemi, Y., ‘Negative Effect of Competence-Competence: The Rule of Priority in Favour of the Arbitrators’, in Gaillard, E. and Di Pietro, D. (eds.), Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements and International Arbitral Awards: The New York Convention in Practice (Cameron May, 2008)Google Scholar

Gama, L. Jr, ‘Tacit Choice of Law in the Hague Principles’ (2017) 22 Uniform Law Review 336Google Scholar

Gama, L. Jr and Saumier, G., ‘Non-State Law in the (Proposed) Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Contracts’, in Fernández Arroyo, D. P. and Obando Peralta, J. J. (eds.), El Derecho Internacional Privado en los Procesos de Integracion Regional (Editorial Juridica Continental, 2011), available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1971302.Google Scholar

Gannagé, P., ‘La pénétration de l'autonomie de la volonté dans le droit international privé de la famille’ [1992] Revue critique de droit international privé 425Google Scholar

Gannagé, L., ‘Le contrat sans loi en droit international privé’ (2007) 11. 3 Electronic Journal of Comparative Law. Available at www.ejcl.org/113/article113-10.pdfGoogle Scholar

Gannagé, L., ‘Les méthodes du droit international privé à l’épreuve des conflits de cultures’ (2013) 357 Recueil des Cours 223Google Scholar

Garcimartin Alferez, F. J., ‘The Rome I Regulation: Exceptions to the Rule on Consumer Contracts and Financial Instruments’ (2009) 5 Journal of Private International Law 85Google Scholar

Garnett, R., ‘The Enforcement of Jurisdiction Clauses in Australia’ (1998) 23 University of New South Wales Law Journal 1Google Scholar

Garnett, R., ‘The Hague Choice of Court Convention: Magnum Opus or Much Ado About Nothing?’ (2009) 5 Journal of Private International Law 161Google Scholar

Garnett, R., ‘Jurisdiction Clauses since Akai’ (2013) 87 Australian Law Journal 134Google Scholar

Garnett, R., ‘Coexisting and Conflicting Jurisdiction and Arbitration Clauses’ (2013) 9 Journal of Private International Law 361Google Scholar

Gélinas, F., ‘Arbitration as Transnational Governance by Contract’ (2016) 7 Transnational Legal Theory 181Google Scholar

Goh, N., ‘A More Valid Presumption in the Implied Choice of Law Governing Arbitration Agreements’ [2015] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 161Google Scholar

Goodwin, J., ‘Reflexive Effect and the Brussels I Regulation’ (2013) 129 Law Quarterly Review 317Google Scholar

Gouiffès, L. and Ordonez, M., ‘Jurisdiction and Admissibility: Are We Any Closer to a Line in the Sand?’ (2015) 31 Arbitration International 109Google Scholar

Grantham, W., ‘The Arbitrability of International Intellectual Property Disputes’ (1996) 14 Berkeley Journal of International Law 173Google Scholar

Graves, J. M., ‘Party Autonomy in Choice of Commercial Law: The Failure of Revised UCC s.1-301 and a Proposal for Broader Reform’ (2005) 36 Seton Hall Law Review 59Google Scholar

Graziano, T. K., ‘The Hague Solution on Choice-of-Law Clauses in Conflicting Standard Terms: Paving the Way to More Legal Certainty in International Commercial Transactions?’ (2017) 22 Uniform Law Review 251Google Scholar

Grigera Naón, H. A., ‘Choice-of-Law Problems in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2001) 289 Recueil des Cours 1Google Scholar

Gruber, U. P., ‘Insurance Contracts’, in Ferrari, F. and Leible, S. (eds.), Rome I Regulation (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2009)Google Scholar

Grusic, U., ‘The Territorial Scope of Employment Legislation and Choice of Law’ (2012) 5 Modern Law Review 722Google Scholar

Grusic, U., The European Private International Law of Employment (Cambridge University Press, 2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guedj, T. G., ‘The Theory of the Lois de Police: A Functional Trend in Continental Private International Law – A Comparative Analysis with Modern American Theories’ (1991) 39 American Journal of Comparative Law 661Google Scholar

Guzman, A. T., ‘Choice of Law: New Foundations’ (2002) 90 Georgetown Law Journal 883Google Scholar

Handford, P., ‘Edward John Eyre and the Conflict of Laws’ (2008) 32 Melbourne University Law Review 822Google Scholar

Hanotiau, B., ‘The Law Applicable to Arbitrability’, in van den Berg, A. J. (ed.), Improving the Efficiency of Arbitration Agreements and Awards: 40 Years of Application of the New York Convention (ICCA Congress Series, vol 9, Kluwer Law International, 1999)Google Scholar

Hanotiau, B., ‘Non-Signatories in International Arbitration: Lessons from Thirty Years of Case Law’, in van den Berg, A. J. (ed.), International Arbitration 2006: Back to Basics? (ICCA Congress Series, vol 13, Kluwer Law International, 2007), 341Google Scholar

Hanotiau, B., ‘Consent to Arbitration: Do We Share a Common Vision?’ (2011) 27 Arbitration International 539Google Scholar

Hanotiau, B., ‘The Law Applicable to Arbitrability’ (2014) 26 Singapore Academy of Law Journal 874Google Scholar

Harris, J., ‘Contractual Freedom in the Conflict of Laws’ (2000) 20 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 247Google Scholar

Harris, J., The Hague Trust Convention: Scope, Application and Preliminary Issues (Hart, 2002)Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford University Press, 1961)Google Scholar

Hartley, T. C., ‘Pleading and Proof of Foreign Law: The Major European Systems Compared’ (1996) 45 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 271Google Scholar

Hartley, T. C., ‘Mandatory Rules in International Contracts: The Common Law Approach’ (1997) 266 Recueil des Cours 337Google Scholar

Hartley, T. C., ‘The European Union and the Systematic Dismantling of the Common Law of Conflict Laws’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 813Google Scholar

Hartley, T. C., ‘Choice-of-Court Agreements and the New Brussels I Regulation’ (2013) 129 Law Quarterly Review 309Google Scholar

Hartley, T. C., Choice-of-Court Agreements Under the European and International Instruments (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Hatzimihail, N. E., ‘The Many Lives – and Faces – of Lex Mercatoria: History as Genealogy in International Business Law’ (2008) 71 Law and Contemporary Problems 169Google Scholar

Hay, P., “Unjust Enrichment in the Conflict of Laws: A Comparative View of German Law and the American Restatement 2d” (1978) 26 American Journal of Comparative Law 3Google Scholar

Hay, P., Borchers, P. J. and Symeonides, S. C., Conflict Of Laws (West, 5th edn, 2010)Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A., The Constitution of Liberty (University of Chicago Press, 1960)Google Scholar

Hayek, F. A., Law, Legislation and Liberty (University of Chicago Press, 1973)Google Scholar

Hayton, D., ‘The Hague Convention on the Law Applicable to Trusts and on their Recognition’ (1987) 36 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 260Google Scholar

Hayward, B., Conflict of Laws and Arbitral Discretion: The Closest Connection Test (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Healy, J. J., ‘Consumer Protection Choice of Law: European Lessons for the United States’ (2009) 19 Duke Journal of International and Comparative Law 535Google Scholar

Heiser, W. W., ‘Forum Selection Clauses in State Courts: Limitations on Enforcement After Stewart and Carnival Cruise’ (1993) 45 Florida Law Review 361Google Scholar

Heiser, W. W., ‘The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements: The Impact on Forum Non Conveniens, Transfer of Venue, Removal, and Recognition of Judgments in United States Courts’ (2010) 31 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 1013Google Scholar

Heiss, H., ‘Insurance Contracts in Rome I: Another Recent Failure of the European Legislature’ (2008) 10 Yearbook of Private International Law 261Google Scholar

Heiss, H., ‘Party Autonomy’, in Ferrari, F. and Leible, S. (eds.), Rome I Regulation (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2009)Google Scholar

Helfand, M. A., Negotiating State and Non-State Law: The Challenge of Global and Local Legal Pluralism (Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar

Hellner, M., ‘Third Country Overriding Mandatory Rules in the Rome I Regulation: Old Wine in New Bottles?’ (2009) 5 Journal of Private International Law 447Google Scholar

Hepple, B. A., ‘Intention to Create Legal Relations’ (1970) 28 Cambridge Law Journal 122Google Scholar

Herbert, J., ‘The Conflict of Laws and Judicial Perspectives on Federalism: A Principled Defence of Tolofson v. Jensen’ (1998) 56 University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 3Google Scholar

Herranz Ballesteros, M., ‘The Regime of Party Autonomy in the Brussels I Recast: The Solutions Adopted for Agreements on Jurisdiction’ (2014) 10 Journal of Private International Law 291Google Scholar

Hiber, D. and Pavić, V., ‘Arbitration and Crime’ (2008) 25 Journal of International Arbitration 461Google Scholar

Highet, K., ‘The Enigma of the Lex Mercatoria’ (1989) 63 Tulane Law Review 613Google Scholar

Hill, J., ‘Choice of Law in Contract under the Rome Convention: The Approach of the UK Courts’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 325Google Scholar

Hill, J., Cross Border Consumer Contracts (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Hill, J., ‘Determining the Seat of an International Arbitration: Party Autonomy and the Interpretation of Arbitration Agreements’ (2014) 63 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 517Google Scholar

Hochstrasser, D., ‘Choice of Law and “Foreign” Mandatory Rules in International Arbitration’ (1994) 11 Journal of International Arbitration 57Google Scholar

Holmes, O. W. Jr, ‘The Path of the Law’ (1897) 10 Harvard Law Review 457Google Scholar

Hook, M., ‘The Choice of Law Agreement as a Reason for Exercising Jurisdiction’ (2014) 63 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 963Google Scholar

Hook, M., The Choice of Law Contract (Hart, 2016)Google Scholar

Hook, M., ‘The “Statutist Trap” and Subject-Matter Jurisdiction’ (2017) 13 Journal of Private International Law 435Google Scholar

Howard, M. N., ‘Floating Choice of Law Clauses – The Star Texas’ [1995] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 1Google Scholar

Howarth, R. J., ‘Lex Mercatoria: Can General Principles of Law Govern International Commercial Contracts?’ (2004) 10 Canterbury Law Review 36Google Scholar

Huo, Z., ‘An Imperfect Improvement: The New Conflict of Laws Act of the People's Republic of China’ (2011) 60 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1065Google Scholar

Jaffey, A. J. E., ‘The English Proper Law Doctrine and the EEC Convention’ (1984) 33 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 531Google Scholar

James, E., ‘John Pfeiffer Pty. Ltd. v. Rogerson: The “Certainty” of Federal Choice of Law Rules for International Torts: Limitations, Implications and a Few Complications’ (2001) 23 Sydney Law Review 145Google Scholar

Jayme, E., ‘L'autonomie de la volonté des parties dans les contrats internationaux entre personnes privées’ (1991) 64-I Annuaire de l'Institut de Droit International 7Google Scholar

Jayme, E., ‘Identité culturelle et intégration – Le droit international privé postmoderne’ (1995) 251 Recueil des Cours 9Google Scholar

Jayme, E., ‘Party Autonomy in International Family and Succession Law: New Tendencies’ (2009) 11 Yearbook of Private International Law 1Google Scholar

Jiménez Figueres, D., ‘Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses in ICC Arbitration’ (2003) 14 ICC Bulletin 71Google Scholar

Johns, F., ‘Performing Party Autonomy’ (2008) 71 Law and Contemporary Problems 243Google Scholar

Jolles, A., ‘Consequences of Multi-Tier Arbitration Clauses: Issues of Enforcement’ (2006) 72 Arbitration 329Google Scholar

Jones, D., ‘Dealing with Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Process’ (2009) 75 Arbitration 188Google Scholar

Juenger, F. K., ‘Conflict of Laws: A Critique of Interest Analysis’ (1984) 32 American Journal of Comparative Law 1Google Scholar

Juenger, F. K., ‘General Course on Private International Law’ (1985) 193 Recueil des Cours 119Google Scholar

Juenger, F. K., Choice of Law and Multistate Justice (Martinus Nijhoff, 1992)Google Scholar

Juenger, F. K., ‘The Inter-American Convention on the Law Applicable to International Contracts: Some Highlights and Comparisons’ (1994) 42 American Journal of Comparative Law 381Google Scholar

Juenger, F. K., ‘Choice of Law in the Americas’ (1997) 45 American Journal of Comparative Law 195Google Scholar

Juenger, F. K., ‘The Lex Mercatoria and Private International Law’ (2000) 60 Louisiana Law Review 1133Google Scholar

Juenger, F. K., ‘A Historical Overview’, in Selected Essays on the Conflict of Laws (Transnational Publishers, 2001)Google Scholar

Kalenský, P., Trends of Private International Law (Springer, 1971)Google Scholar

Kalicki, J. and Madeiros, S., ‘Investment Arbitration in Brazil: Revisiting Brazil's Traditional Reluctance Towards ICSID, BITs and Investor-State Arbitration’ (2008) 24 Arbitration International 423Google Scholar

Karayanidi, M., ‘Reassessing the Approach to Jurisdiction in Civil and Commercial Matters: Party Autonomy, Categorical Equality and Sovereignty’ (2017), PhD thesis, Trinity College Dublin (on file with author)Google Scholar

Karayanni, M. M., ‘The Public Policy Exception to the Enforcement of Forum Selection Clauses’ (1996) 34 Duquesne Law Review 1009Google Scholar

Kayali, D., ‘Enforceability of Multi-Tiered Dispute Resolution Clauses’ (2010) 27 Journal of International Arbitration 551Google Scholar

Kegel, G. and Schurig, K., Internationales Privatrecht (C. H. Beck, 9th edn, 2004)Google Scholar

Kenny, D. and Hennigan, R., ‘Choice-of-Court Agreements, the Italian Torpedo, and the Recast of the Brussels I Regulation’ (2015) 64 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 197Google Scholar

Keyes, M., ‘Statutes, Choice of Law, and the Role of Forum Choice’ (2008) 4 Journal of Private International Law 1Google Scholar

Keyes, M., ‘Jurisdiction under the Hague Choice of Courts Convention: Its Likely Impact on Australian Practice’ (2009) 5 Journal of Private International Law 181Google Scholar

Keyes, M. and Marshall, B. A., ‘Jurisdiction Agreements: Exclusive, Optional and Asymmetrical’ (2015) 11 Journal of Private International Law 345Google Scholar

Kjos, H. E., Applicable Law in Investor-State Arbitration: The Interplay between National and International Law (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Kleinheisterkamp, J., ‘The Impact of Internationally Mandatory Rules on the Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements’ (2009) 3 World Arbitration and Mediation Review 91Google Scholar

Knight, S. M., ‘Avoidance of Foreign Jurisdiction Clauses in International Contracts’ (1977) 26 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 664Google Scholar

Knight, C. J. S., ‘The Damage of Damages: Agreements on Jurisdiction and Choice of Law’ (2008) 4 Journal of Private International Law 501Google Scholar

Knop, K., Michaels, R. and Riles, A., ‘From Multiculturalism to Technique: Feminism, Culture and the Conflict of Laws Style’ (2012) 64 Stanford Law Review 589Google Scholar

Kohler, C., ‘L'autonomie de la volonté en droit international privé: un principe universel entre libéralisme et étatisme’ (2013) 359 Recueil des Cours 285Google Scholar

Kono, T. (ed.), Intellectual Property and Private International Law: Comparative Perspectives (Hart, 2012)Google Scholar

Korzun, V., ‘Arbitrating Anti-Trust Claims: From Suspicion to Trust’ (2016) 48 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 867Google Scholar

Kramer, X. E., ‘The Rome II Regulation on the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations: The European Private International Law Tradition Continued’ (2008) 26 Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht (NIPR) 414Google Scholar

Kronstein, H., ‘Arbitration is Power’ (1963) 38 New York University Law Review 661Google Scholar

Kruger, T., ‘The Anti-suit Injunction in the European Judicial Space: Turner v. Grovit’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1030Google Scholar

Kruger, T., ‘Rome III and Parties’ Choice’ (2014) Family & Law, available at www.bjutijdschriften.nl/tijdschrift/fenr/2014/01/FENR-D-13-00010.Google Scholar

Kryvoi, Y., ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil in International Arbitration’ (2011) 1 Global Business Law Review 169Google Scholar

Kuhn, A. K., ‘Local and Transitory Actions in Private International Law’ (1918) 66 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 301Google Scholar

Lalive, P., ‘Transnational (or Truly International) Public Policy and International Arbitration’, in Sanders, P. (ed.), Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy in Arbitration (ICCA Congress Series, vol 3, Kluwer Law International, 1986)Google Scholar

Lando, O., ‘The Lex Mercatoria in International Commercial Arbitration’ (1985) 34 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 747Google Scholar

Lando, O., ‘The EEC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations’ (1987) 24 Common Market Law Review 159Google Scholar

Lando, O. and Nielson, P. A., ‘The Rome I Regulation’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review 1687Google Scholar

Leboulanger, P., ‘The Arbitration Agreement: Still Autonomous?’, in van den Berg, A. J. (ed.), International Arbitration 2006: Back to Basics? (ICCA Congress Series, vol 13, Kluwer Law International, 2007)Google Scholar

Lee, Y., ‘Note: Forum Selection Clauses: Problems of Enforcement in Diversity Cases and State Courts’ (1997) 35 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 663Google Scholar

Leflar, R. A., ‘Choice-Influencing Considerations in Conflicts Law’ (1966) 41 New York University Law Review 267Google Scholar

Leflar, R. A., ‘Conflicts Law: More on Choice-Influencing Considerations’ (1966) 54 California Law Review 1584Google Scholar

Lehmann, M., ‘Liberating the Individual from Battles between States: Justifying Party Autonomy in Conflict of Laws’ (2008) 41 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 381Google Scholar

Lenhoff, A., ‘The Parties’ Choice of a Forum: “Prorogation Agreements”’ (1961) 15 Rutgers Law Review 414Google Scholar

Lew, J., ‘Competition Laws: Limits to Arbitrators’ Authority’, in Mistelis, L. A. and Brekoulakis, S. L. (eds.), Arbitrability: International and Comparative Perspectives (Kluwer Law International, 2009)Google Scholar

Lewis, A., Taylor, J., De Marco, N. and Segan, J., Challenging Sports Governing Bodies (Bloomsbury Professional, 2016)Google Scholar

Liang, J., ‘Statutory Restrictions on Party Autonomy in China's Private International Law of Contract: How Far does the 2010 Codification Go?’ (2012) 8 Journal of Private International Law 77Google Scholar

Lindell, G., ‘Choice of Law in Torts and Another Farewell to Phillips v. Eyre but the Voth Test Retained for Forum Non Conveniens in Australia’ (2002) 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law 64Google Scholar

Lipstein, K., ‘Inherent Limitations in Statutes and the Conflict of Laws’ (1977) 26 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 884Google Scholar

Liukkunen, U., ‘Lex Mercatoria in International Arbitration’, in Klabbers, J. and Piiparinen, T. (eds.), Normative Pluralism and International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Lorenzen, E. G., ‘Huber's De Conflictu Legum’ (1919) 13 Illinois Law Review 375Google Scholar

Lorenzen, E. G., ‘Validity and Effect of Contracts in the Conflict of Laws (Part II)’ (1921) 30 Yale Law Journal 655Google Scholar

Lorenzen, E. G., ‘The French Rules of the Conflict of Laws’ (1928) 38 Yale Law Journal 165Google Scholar

Lorenzen, E. G., ‘Pan-American Code of Private International Law’ (1930) 4 Tulane Law Review 499Google Scholar

Lorenzen, E. G., ‘Commercial Arbitration – International and Interstate Aspects’ (1934) 43 Yale Law Journal 716Google Scholar

Low, G., ‘A Psychology of Choice of Laws’ [2013] European Business Law Review 363Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, A. F., ‘Lex Mercatoria: An Arbitrator's View’ (1990) 6 Arbitration International 133Google Scholar

Lowenfeld, A. F., ‘International Litigation and the Quest for Reasonableness’ (1994) 245 Recueil des Cours 1Google Scholar

Lunts, L. A., Mezinárodní právo soukromé (Orbis, 1952)Google Scholar

Magnus, U., ‘Article 4 Rome I Regulation: The Applicable Law in the Absence of Choice’, in Ferrari, F. and Leible, S. (eds.), Rome I Regulation (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2009)Google Scholar

Mahmoud, M. S. M., ‘Loi d'autonomie et méthodes de protection de la partie faible en droit international privé’ (2005) 315 Recueil des Cours 141Google Scholar

Mankowski, P., ‘Just How Free Is a Free Choice of Law in Contract in the EU?’ (2017) 13 Journal of Private International Law 231Google Scholar

Mankowski, P., ‘Article 3 of the Hague Principles: The Final Breakthrough for the Choice of Non-State Law?’ (2017) 22 Uniform Law Review 369Google Scholar

Mann, F. A., ‘State Contracts and International Arbitration’ (1967) 42 British Yearbook of International Law 1Google Scholar

Mann, F. A., ‘Lex Facit Arbitrum’, in Sanders, P. (ed.), International Arbitration – Liber Amicorum for Martin Domke (Martinus Nijhoff, 1967)Google Scholar

Mann, F. A., ‘Statutes and the Conflict of Laws’ (1972–73) 46 British Yearbook of International Law 117Google Scholar

Mann, F. A., ‘England Rejects “Delocalised” Contracts and Arbitration’ (1980) 33 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 193Google Scholar

Marshall, B. A., ‘Reconsidering the Proper Law of the Contract’ (2012) 13 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Marshall, B. A. and Keyes, M., ‘Australia's Accession to the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements’ (2017) 41 Melbourne University Law Review 246Google Scholar

Matulionyte, R., ‘Calling for Party Autonomy in Intellectual Property Infringement Cases’ (2013) 9 Journal of Private International Law 77Google Scholar

Maultzsch, F., ‘Party Autonomy in European Private International Law: Uniform Principle or Context-Dependent Instrument?’ (2016) 12 Journal of Private International Law 466Google Scholar

Mayer, P., ‘Mandatory Rules of Law in International Arbitration’ (1986) 2 Arbitration International 274Google Scholar

Mayer, P., ‘The Extension of the Arbitration Clause to Non-Signatories – The Irreconcilable Positions of French and English Courts’ (2012) 27 American University International Law Review 831Google Scholar

McClean, D., ‘A Common Inheritance? An Examination of the Private International Law Tradition of the Commonwealth’ (1996) 260 Recueil des Cours 9Google Scholar

McConnaughay, P. J., ‘The Risks and Virtues of Lawlessness: A “Second Look” at International Commercial Arbitration’ (1999) 93 Northwestern University Law Review 453Google Scholar

McConnaughay, P. J., ‘The Scope of Autonomy in International Contracts and Its Relation to Economic Regulation and Development’ (2001) 39 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 595Google Scholar

McLachlan, C., ‘Splitting the Proper Law in Private International Law’ (1990) 61 British Yearbook of International Law 311Google Scholar

McLachlan, C., Foreign Relations Law (Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Merrett, L., ‘The Enforcement of Jurisidiction Agreements within the Brussels Regime’ (2006) 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 315Google Scholar

Merrett, L., ‘Article 23 of the Brussels I Regulation: A Comprehensive Code for Jurisdiction Agreements?’ (2009) 58 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 545Google Scholar

Merrett, L., ‘Choice of Law in Insurance Contracts Under the Rome I Regulation’ (2009) 5 Journal of Private International Law 40Google Scholar

Merrett, L., Employment Contracts in Private International Law (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Merrett, L., ‘The Future Enforcement of Asymmetric Jurisdiction Agreements’ (2018) 67 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 37Google Scholar

Michaels, R., ‘EU Law as Private International Law? Reconceptualising the Country-of-Origin Principle as Vested-Rights Theory’ (2006) 2 Journal of Private International Law 195Google Scholar

Michaels, R., ‘The True Lex Mercatoria: Law Beyond the State’ (2007) 14 Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 447Google Scholar

Michaels, R., ‘Global Legal Pluralism’ (2009) 5 Annual Review of Law & Social Science 243Google Scholar

Michaels, R., ‘Roles and Role Perceptions of International Arbitrators’, in Mattli, W. and Dietz, T. (eds.), International Arbitration and Global Governance: Contending Theories and Evidence (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Michaels, R., ‘Non-State Law in the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts’, in Purnhagen, K. and Rott, P. (eds.), Varieties of European Economic Law and Regulation: Liber Amicorum for Hans Micklitz (Springer, 2014)Google Scholar

Millett, P., ‘Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in the Law of Restitution’, in Sood, T. et al. (eds.), Current Issues in International Commercial Litigation (National University of Singapore, 1997).Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘The Private History of International Law’ (2006) 55 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘Renvoi and the Proof of Foreign Law in Australia’ (2006) 65 Cambridge Law Journal 37Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘Arbitral Jurisdiction and the Mischievous Presumption of Identity of Foreign Law’ (2008) 67 Cambridge Law Journal 25Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘The Dimensions of Public Policy in Private International Law’ (2008) 4 Journal of Private International Law 201Google Scholar

Mills, A., The Confluence of Public and Private International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘The Application of Multiple Laws under the Rome II Regulation’, in Binchy, W. and Ahern, J. (eds.), The Rome II Regulation (Brill, 2009)Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘Federalism in the European Union and the United States: Subsidiarity, Private Law and the Conflict of Laws’ (2010) 32 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 369Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘Antinomies of Public and Private at the Foundations of International Investment Law and Arbitration’ (2011) 14 Journal of International Economic Law 469Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘The Identities of Private International Law – Lessons from the US and EU Revolutions’ (2013) 23 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 445Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘Rethinking Jurisdiction in International Law’ (2014) 84 British Yearbook of International Law 187Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘The Law Applicable to Cross-Border Defamation on Social Media: Whose Law Governs Free Speech in “Facebookistan”?’ (2015) 7 Journal of Media Law 1Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘Private International Law and EU External Relations: Think Local Act Global, or Think Global Act Local?’ (2016) 65 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 541Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘The Principled English Ambivalence to Law and Dispute Resolution Beyond the State’, in Betancourt, J. C. (ed.), Liber Amicorum for the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators: Selected Topics in International Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Mills, A. ‘The Hague Choice of Court Convention and Cross-Border Commercial Dispute Resolution in Australia and the Asia-Pacific’ (2017) 18 Melbourne Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘States, Failed and Non-recognized’, in Basedow, J., Ferrari, F., Asensio, P. and Rühl, G. (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Private International Law (Edward Elgar, 2017)Google Scholar

Mills, A., ‘Arbitral Jurisdiction’, in Schultz, T. and Ortino, F. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2018)Google Scholar

Mistelis, L. A. and Brekoulakis, S. L. (eds.), Arbitrability: International and Comparative Perspectives (Kluwer Law International, 2009)Google Scholar

Moreno Rodriguez, J. A. and Albornoz, M. M., ‘Reflections on the Mexico Convention in the Context of the Preparation of the Future Hague Instrument on International Contracts’ (2011) 7 Journal of Private International Law 491Google Scholar

Morris, J. H. C., ‘The Choice of Law Clause in Statutes’ (1946) 62 Law Quarterly Review 170Google Scholar

Morse, C. G. J., ‘The EEC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations’ (1982) 2 Yearbook of European Law 107Google Scholar

Muir Watt, H., ‘Choice of Law in Integrated and Interconnected Markets: A Matter of Political Economy’ (2003) 9 Columbia Journal of European Law 383Google Scholar

Muir Watt, H., ‘Aspects économiques du droit international privé’ (2004) 307 Recueil des Cours 1Google Scholar

Muir Watt, H., ‘European Integration, Legal Diversity and the Conflict of Laws’ (2005) 9 Edinburgh Law Review 6Google Scholar

Muir Watt, H., ‘“Party Autonomy” in International Contracts: From the Makings of a Myth to the Requirements of Global Governance’ (2010) 6 European Review of Contract Law 250Google Scholar

Muir Watt, H., ‘Conflicts of Laws Unbounded: The Case for a Legal-Pluralist Revival’ (2016) 7 Transnational Legal Theory 313Google Scholar

Muir Watt, H. and Fernández Arroyo, D. P. (eds.), Private International Law and Global Governance (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Mullinex, L. S., ‘Another Easy Case, Some More Bad Law: Carnival Cruise Lines and Contractual Personal Jurisdiction’ (1992) 27 Texas International Law Journal 323Google Scholar

Mustill, M., ‘The New Lex Mercatoria: The First Twenty-Five Years’ (1988) 4 Arbitration International 86Google Scholar

Mutton, A., ‘Choice of Law on the High Seas: Blunden v. Commonwealth’ (2004) 26 Sydney Law Review 427Google Scholar

Nafziger, J. A. R., ‘Oregon's Conflicts Law Applicable to Contracts’ (2002) 38 Willamette Law Review 397Google Scholar

Nagy, C. I., ‘What Functions May Party Autonomy Have in International Family and Succession Law? An EU Perspective’ (2012) 30 Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht 576Google Scholar

Nazzini, R., ‘The Law Applicable to the Arbitration Agreement: Towards Transnational Principles’ (2016) 65 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 681Google Scholar

Niboyet, J. P., ‘La Théorie de l'Autonomie de la Volonté’ (1927) 16 Recueil des Cours 1Google Scholar

Nielsen, P. A., ‘The Rome I Regulation and Contracts of Carriage’, in Ferrari, F. and Leible, S. (eds.), Rome I Regulation (Sellier European Law Publishers, 2009)Google Scholar

Nielson, P. A. and Lando, O., ‘The Rome I Regulation’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review 1687Google Scholar

Nishitani, Y., ‘Party Autonomy in Contemporary Private International Law’ (2016) 59 Japanese Yearbook of International Law 300Google Scholar

Norris, K., ‘Common European Sales Law: A Missed Opportunity or Better Things to Come?’ (2016) 37 Business Law Review 29Google Scholar

North, P., Private International Law Problems in Common Law Jurisdictions (Kluwer Law International/M. Nijhoff, 1993)Google Scholar

Nozick, R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Basic Books, 1974)Google Scholar

Nuyts, A., Study on Residual Jurisdiction: General Report (2007), European Commission Study JLS/C4/2005/07-30-CEGoogle Scholar

Nygh, P. E., ‘The Reasonable Expectations of the Parties as a Guide to the Choice of Law in Contract and in Tort’ (1995) 251 Recueil des Cours 1Google Scholar

Nygh, P. E., Autonomy in International Contracts (Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Ogus, A., ‘Competition between National Legal Systems: A Contribution of Economic Analysis to Comparative Law’ (1999) 48 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 405Google Scholar

O'Hara, E. A. and Ribstein, L. E., ‘From Politics to Efficiency in Choice of Law’ (2000) 67 University of Chicago Law Review 1151Google Scholar

O’Hara, E. A. and Ribstein, L. E., The Law Market (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Oser, D., The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts: A Governing Law? (Brill, 2008)Google Scholar

Oster, J., ‘Public Policy and Human Rights’ (2015) 11 Journal of Private International Law 542Google Scholar

Panagopoulos, G., Restitution in Private International Law (Hart, 2000)Google Scholar

Park, W. W., ‘Determining Arbitral Jurisdiction: Allocation of Tasks Between Courts and Arbitrators’ (2000) 9 Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Law Journal 19Google Scholar

Park, W. W., ‘The Arbitrator's Jurisdiction to Determine Jurisdiction’, in van den Berg, A. J. (ed.), International Arbitration 2006: Back to Basics? (ICCA Congress Series, vol 13, Kluwer Law International, 2007)Google Scholar

Park, W. W., ‘Determining an Arbitrator's Jurisdiction: Timing and Finality in American Law’ (2007) 8 Nevada Law Journal 135Google Scholar

Park, W. W., ‘Non-Signatories and International Arbitration’, in Newman, L. W. and Hill, R. D. (eds.), Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration (Juris Publishing, 3rd edn, 2014)Google Scholar

Parra-Aranguren, G., ‘General Course of Private International Law: Selected Problems’ (1988) 210 Recueil des Cours 9Google Scholar

Paulsson, J., ‘Jurisdiction and Admissibility’, in Aksen, G. et al. (eds.), Global Reflections on International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner (ICC Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar

Paulsson, J., ‘Arbitration in Three Dimensions’ (2011) 60 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 291Google Scholar

Paulsson, J., The Idea of Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Pavlović, M., ‘Contracting Out of Access to Justice: Enforcement of Forum-Selection Clauses in Consumer Contracts’ (2016) 62 McGill Law Journal 389Google Scholar

Peari, S., ‘The Choice-Based Perspective of Choice-of-Law’ (2013) 23 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 477Google Scholar

Peari, S., ‘Savigny's Theory of Choice of Law as a Principle of “Voluntary Submission”’ (2014) 64 University of Toronto Law Journal 106Google Scholar

Pearson, S., ‘Sulamérica v. Enesa: The Hidden Pro-validation Approach Adopted by the English Courts with Respect to the Proper Law of the Arbitration Agreement’ (2013) 29 Arbitration International 115Google Scholar

Penadés Fons, M., ‘Commercial Choice of Law in Context: Looking Beyond Rome’ (2015) 78 Modern Law Review 241Google Scholar

Pereznieto Castro, L., ‘La tradition territorialiste en Droit International Privé dans les pays d'Amérique Latine’ (1985) 190 Recueil des Cours 271Google Scholar

Pertegás, M. and Marshall, B. A., ‘Party Autonomy and Its Limits: Convergence through the New Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts’ (2014) 39 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 975Google Scholar

Petch, T., ‘The Treatment of Asymmetric Jurisdiction Clauses in Financial Contracts in France and England’ (2016) 5 UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 313Google Scholar

Peters, A., ‘Humanity as the A and Ω of Sovereignty’ (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 513Google Scholar

Petsoulas, C., Hayek's Liberalism and Its Origins: His Idea of Spontaneous Order and the Scottish Enlightenment (Routledge, 2001)Google Scholar

Piggott, F. T., Service Out of the Jurisdiction (W Clowes and Sons, 1892)Google Scholar

Pitel, S. G. A., ‘The Characterisation of Unjust Enrichment in the Conflict of Laws’, in Neyers, J. W., McInnes, M., and Pitel, S. G. A. (eds.), Understanding Unjust Enrichment (Hart, 2004)Google Scholar

Pontier, J. A., ‘The Justification of Choice of Law: A Liberal-Political Theory as a Critical and Explanatory Model, and the Field of International Consumer Transactions as an Example’ (1998) 45 Netherlands International Law Review 388Google Scholar

Posner, E., ‘The Questionable Basis of the Common European Sales Law: The Role of an Optional Instrument in Jurisdictional Competition’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review 261Google Scholar

Princi, J., ‘In Pursuit of Justice for Tort Choice of Law’ [2002] Australian International Law Journal 237Google Scholar

Pryles, M., ‘Application of the Lex Mercatoria in International Commercial Arbitration’ (2003) 18 International Arbitration Report 21Google Scholar

Pryles, M., ‘Reflections on Transnational Public Policy’ (2007) 24 Journal of International Arbitration 1Google Scholar

Radicati di Brozolo, L. G., ‘The Impact of National Law and Courts on International Commercial Arbitration: Mythology, Physiology, Pathology, Remedies and Trends’ (2011) 3 Paris Journal of International Arbitration 663Google Scholar

Radicati di Brozolo, L. G., ‘Arbitration and Competition Law: The Position of the Courts and of Arbitrators’ (2011) 27 Arbitration International 1Google Scholar

Radicati di Brozolo, L. G., ‘Non-national Rules and Conflicts of Laws’ (2012) 48 Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale 841, available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2089822Google Scholar

Radicati di Brozolo, L. G., ‘Mandatory Rules and International Arbitration’ (2012) 23 American Review of International Arbitration 49Google Scholar

Raphael, T., The Anti-Suit Injunction (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Ratković, T. and Zgrabljić Rotar, D., ‘Choice-of-Court Agreements under the Brussels I Regulation (Recast)’ (2013) 9 Journal of Private International Law 245Google Scholar

Rau, A. S., ‘Everything You Really Need to Know About “Separability” in Seventeen Simple Propositions’ (2003) 14 American Review of International Arbitration 121Google Scholar

Blackaby, N. et al., Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 6th edn, 2015)Google Scholar

Reese, W. L. M., ‘Power of Parties to Choose Law Governing Their Contract’ (1960) 54 Proceedings of the American Society of International Law at Its Annual Meeting 49Google Scholar

Reese, W. L. M., ‘The Contractual Forum: Situation in the United States’ (1964) 13 American Journal of Comparative Law 187Google Scholar

Reimann, M., ‘Savigny's Triumph? Choice of Law in Contracts Cases at the Close of the Twentieth Century’ (1999) 39 Virginia Journal of International Law 571Google Scholar

Reisberg, S. H., ‘The Rules Governing Who Decides Jurisdictional Issues: First Options v. Kaplan Revisited’ (2009) 20 American Review of International Arbitration 159Google Scholar

Resnik, J., ‘Fairness in Numbers: A Comment on AT&T v. Concepcion, Wal-Mart v. Dukes, and Turner v. Rogers’ (2011) 125 Harvard Law Review 78Google Scholar

Ribstein, L. E., ‘Choosing Law by Contract’ (1993) 18 Journal of Corporation Law 245Google Scholar

Ritchie, J. Z., ‘A Tie That Binds: Forum Selection Clause Enforceability in West Virginia’ (2010) 113 West Virginia Law Review 95Google Scholar

Rose, F. (ed.), Restitution and the Conflict of Laws (Mansfield Press, 1995)Google Scholar

Roth, W., ‘From Centros to Überseering: Free Movement of Companies, Private International Law, and Community Law’ (2003) 52 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 177Google Scholar

Rowan, S., ‘The New French Law of Contract’ (2017) 66 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 805Google Scholar

Rühl, G., ‘Party Autonomy in the Private International Law of Contracts: Transatlantic Convergence and Economic Efficiency’, in Gottschalk, E. et al. (eds.), Conflict of Laws in a Globalized World (Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Rühl, G., ‘Extending Ingmar to Jurisdiction and Arbitration Clauses: The End of Party Autonomy in Contracts with Commercial Agents?’ (2007) 6 European Review of Private Law 891Google Scholar

Rühl, G., ‘Consumer Protection in Choice of Law’ (2011) 44 Cornell International Law Journal 569Google Scholar

Rühl, G., ‘The Common European Sales Law: 28th Regime, 2nd Regime or 1st Regime?’ (2012) 19 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 148Google Scholar

Rühl, G., ‘The Protection of Weaker Parties in the Private International Law of the European Union: A Portrait of Inconsistency and Conceptual Truancy’ (2014) 10 Journal of Private International Law 335Google Scholar

Rühl, G., ‘Commercial Agents, Minimum Harmonization and Overriding Mandatory Provisions in the European Union: Unamar’ (2016) 53 Common Market Law Review 209Google Scholar

Rushworth, A. and Scott, A., ‘Rome II: Choice of Law for Non-Contractual Obligations’ [2008] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 274Google Scholar

Salacuse, J. W., The Three Laws of International Investment: National, Contractual and International Frameworks for Foreign Capital (Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Samuel, G., The Law of Obligations (Edward Elgar, 2010)Google Scholar

Sanchez Fernandez, S., ‘Choice of Court Agreements: Breach and Damages within the Brussels I Regime’ (2010) 12 Yearbook of Private International Law 377Google Scholar

Sasson, M., Substantive Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration: The Unsettled Relationship Between International and Municipal Law (Kluwer Law International, 2010)Google Scholar

Saumier, G., ‘Designating the UNIDROIT Principles in International Dispute Resolution’ (2012) 17 Uniform Law Review 533Google Scholar

Saumier, G., ‘The Hague Principles and the Choice of Non-State “Rules of Law” to Govern an International Commercial Contract’ (2014) 40 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 1Google Scholar

Saumier, G., ‘Article 3 of the Hague Principles: A Response to Peter Mankowski’ (2017) 22 Uniform Law Review 395Google Scholar

von Savigny, F. K., Private International Law. A Treatise on the Conflict of Laws, and the Limits of Their Operation in Respect of Place and Time (originally published 1849, trans. Guthrie, W., Stevens and Sons, 1869)Google Scholar

Schmitz, A. J., ‘American Exceptionalism in Consumer Arbitration’ (2013) 10 Loyola University Chicago International Law Review 81Google Scholar

Schneewind, J. B., The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar

Schultz, T., ‘Some Critical Comments on the Juridicity of Lex Mercatoria’ (2008) 10 Yearbook of Private International Law 667Google Scholar

Schultz, T., Transnational Legality: Stateless Law and International Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Sherborne, A. K. E., ‘Restitution in the Conflict of Laws: Characterization and Choice-of-Law in Australia’ (2017) 13 Journal of Private International Law 1Google Scholar

Shore, L., ‘The United States’ Perspective on “Arbitrability”’, in Mistelis, L. A. and Brekoulakis, S. L. (eds.), Arbitrability: International and Comparative Perspectives (Kluwer Law International, 2009)Google Scholar

Silberman, L. J. and Yaffe, N. D., ‘The Transnational Case in Conflict of Laws: Two Suggestions for the New Restatement Third of Conflict of Laws – Judicial Jurisdiction over Foreign Defendants and Party Autonomy in International Contracts’ (2017) 27 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 405Google Scholar

Smith, C. and Moyé, E. V., ‘Outsourcing American Civil Justice: Mandatory Arbitration Clauses in Consumer and Employment Contracts’ (2012) 44 Texas Tech Law Review 281Google Scholar

Smith, L. M., ‘Determining the Arbitrability of International Antitrust Disputes’ (1986) 8 Journal of Comparative Business and Capital Market Law 197Google Scholar

Smits, J. M., ‘Plurality of Sources in European Private Law, or: How to Live With Legal Diversity?’, in Brownsword, R. et al. (eds.), The Foundations of European Private Law (Hart, 2011)Google Scholar

Smits, J. M., ‘A Radical View of Legal Pluralism’, in Niglia, L. (ed.), Pluralism and European Private Law (Hart, 2013)Google Scholar

Smits, J. M., ‘Party Choice and the Common European Sales Law, or: How to Prevent the CESL from Becoming a Lemon on the Law Market’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review 51Google Scholar

Smutny, A. C. and Pham, H. T., ‘Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards in the United States: The Non-Arbitrable Subject Matter Defense’ (2008) 25 Journal of International Arbitration 657Google Scholar

Sohn, L. B., ‘The New International Law: Protection of the Rights of Individuals Rather Than States’ (1982) 32 American University Law Review 1Google Scholar

Solomon, D., ‘The Private International Law of Contracts in Europe: Advances and Retreats’ (2008) 82 Tulane Law Review 1709Google Scholar

Spiermann, O., ‘Applicable Law’, in Muchlinski, P., Ortino, F. and Schreuer, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Steingruber, A. M., Consent in International Arbitration (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Steinle, J. and Vasiliades, E., ‘The Enforcement of Jurisdiction Agreements under the Brussels I Regulation: Reconsidering the Principle of Party Autonomy’ (2010) 6 Journal of Private International Law 565Google Scholar

Stellios, J., ‘Choice of Law and the Australian Constitution: Locating the Debate’ (2005) 33 Federal Law Review 7Google Scholar

Sternlight, J. R., ‘Panacea or Corporate Tool?: Debunking the Supreme Court's Preference for Binding Arbitration’ (1996) 74 Washington University Law Quarterly 637Google Scholar

Stevens, R., ‘Resulting Trusts in the Conflict of Laws’, in Birks, P. and Rose, F. (eds.), Restitution and Equity, Vol 1, Resulting Trusts and Equitable Compensation (Mansfield Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Stipanowich, T. J., ‘The Third Arbitration Trilogy: Stolt-Nielsen, Rent-a-Center, Concepcion and the Future of American Arbitration’ (2011) 22 American Review of International Arbitration 323Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A., ‘The New Lex Mercatoria and Transnational Governance’ (2006) 13 Journal of European Public Policy 627Google Scholar

Story, J., Commentary on the Conflict of Laws (Hilliard, Gray and Co, 1834)Google Scholar

Stringer, D., ‘Choice of Law and Choice of Forum in Brazilian International Commercial Contracts: Party Autonomy, International Jurisdiction, and the Emerging Third Way’ (2006) 44 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 959Google Scholar

Strong, S. I., ‘What Constitutes an “Agreement in Writing” in International Commercial Arbitration? Conflicts between the New York Convention and the Federal Arbitration Act’ (2012) 48 Stanford Journal of International Law 47Google Scholar

Strong, S. I., ‘Does Class Arbitration Change the Nature of Arbitration? Stolt-Nielson, AT&T, and a Return to First Principles’ (2012) 17 Harvard Negotiation Law Review 201Google Scholar

Strong, S. I., ‘Arbitration of Trust Disputes: Two Bodies of Law Collide’ (2012) 45 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 1157Google Scholar

Sun, J., ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Special Limitations to Party Autonomy in Non-Contractual Obligation in EU and China’ (2016) 13 US-China Law Review 399Google Scholar

Symeonides, S. C., ‘Rome II and Tort Conflicts: A Missed Opportunity’ (2008) 56 American Journal of Comparative Law 173Google Scholar

Symeonides, S. C., ‘The Hague Principles on Choice of Law for International Contracts: Some Preliminary Comments’ (2013) 61 American Journal of Comparative Law 873Google Scholar

Symeonides, S. C., ‘Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2012: Twenty-Sixth Annual Survey’ (2013) 61 American Journal of Comparative Law 217Google Scholar

Symeonides, S. C., Codifying Choice of Law Around the World: An International Comparative Analysis (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Symeonides, S. C., ‘Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2014: Twenty-Eighth Annual Survey’ (2015) 63 American Journal of Comparative Law 299Google Scholar

Symeonides, S. C., Choice of Law (Oxford University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Symeonides, S. C., ‘Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2016: Thirtieth Annual Survey’ (2017) 65 American Journal of Comparative Law 1Google Scholar

Symeonides, S. C., ‘What Law Governs Forum Selection Clauses?’ (2017) Louisiana Law Review forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3014070Google Scholar

Takahashi, K., ‘Damages for Breach of a Choice of Court Agreement’ (2008) 10 Yearbook of Private International Law 57Google Scholar

Tan, D., ‘Anti-suit Injunctions and the Vexing Problem of Comity’ (2005) 45 Virginia Journal of International Law 283Google Scholar

Tan, D., ‘Damages for Breach of Forum Selection Clauses, Principled Remedies, and Control of International Civil Litigation’ (2005) 40 Texas International Law Journal 623Google Scholar

Tan, P., ‘Between Competing Jurisdiction Clauses: A Pro-Arbitration Bias?’ [2011] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 15Google Scholar

Tan, D. and Yeo, N., ‘Breaking Promises to Litigate in a Particular Forum: Are Damages an Appropriate Remedy?’ [2003] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 435Google Scholar

Tang, Z. S., ‘Non-State Law in Chinese Choice of Law Rules’ (2011). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2079244Google Scholar

Tang, Z. S., ‘Effectiveness of Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses in the Chinese Courts’ (2012) 61 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 459Google Scholar

Tang, Z. S., Xiao, Y., and Huo, Z., Conflict of Laws in the People's Republic of China (Edward Elgar, 2016)Google Scholar

Taylor, D. H., ‘The Forum Selection Clause: A Tale of Two Concepts’ (1993) 66 Temple Law Review 785Google Scholar

Teitel, R., Humanity's Law (Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar

Teitz, L. E., ‘The Hague Choice of Court Convention: Validating Party Autonomy and Providing an Alternative to Arbitration’ (2005) 53 American Journal of Comparative Law 543Google Scholar

Tesón, F. R., ‘The Kantian Theory of International Law’ (1992) 92 Columbia Law Review 53Google Scholar

Tetley, W., ‘Current Developments in Canadian Private International Law’ (1999) 78 Canadian Bar Review 152Google Scholar

Teubner, G., Global Law Without a State (Ashgate, 1997)Google Scholar

Tham, C. H., ‘Damages for Breach of English Jurisdiction Clauses: More than Meets the Eye’ [2004] Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 46Google Scholar

Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, ‘Developing Commercial Law through the Courts: Rebalancing the Relationship between the Courts and Arbitration’, The Bailii Lecture, London, 9 March 2016. Available at www.judiciary.gov.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2016/03/lcjspeechbaillilecture20160309.pdfGoogle Scholar

Tiburcio, C., ‘Private International Law in Brazil: A Brief Overview’ (2013) 1 Panorama of Brazilian Law 11Google Scholar

Tilbury, M., Davis, G. and Opeskin, B., Conflict of Laws in Australia (Oxford University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Torremans, P. (ed.), Intellectual Property and Private International Law (Edward Elgar, 2015)Google Scholar

Trakman, L. E., ‘A Plural Account of the Transnational Law Merchant’ (2011) 2 Transnational Legal Theory 309Google Scholar

Triebel, V., ‘The Choice of Law in Commercial Relations: A German Perspective’ (1988) 37 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 935Google Scholar

Tu, G., ‘The Hague Choice of Court Convention: A Chinese Perspective’ (2007) 55 American Journal of Comparative Law 347Google Scholar

Tu, G. and Xu, M., ‘Contractual Conflicts in the People's Republic of China: The Applicable Law in the Absence of Choice’ (2011) 7 Journal of Private International Law 179Google Scholar

Tweeddale, A., ‘Arbitration under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 and Enforcement of an Award’ (2011) 27 Arbitration International 653Google Scholar

Tweeddale, A. and Tweeddale, K., ‘Commencement of Arbitration and Time-Bar Clauses’ (2009) 75 Arbitration 480Google Scholar

Tweeddale, A., and Tweeddale, K., ‘Scott v Avery Clauses: O'er Judges’ Fingers, Who Straight Dream on Fees’ (2011) 77 Arbitration 423Google Scholar

van den Berg, A. J., ‘Should the Setting Aside of the Arbitral Award be Abolished?’ (2014) 29 ICSID Review 263Google Scholar

Van Loon, J. H. A., ‘The Global Horizon of Private International Law’ (2016) 380 Recueil des Cours 9Google Scholar

Verhagen, H. L. E., ‘The Tension between Party Autonomy and European Union Law: Some Observations on Ingmar GB Ltd v Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc’ (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 135Google Scholar

Vischer, F., ‘General Course on Private International Law’ (1992-I) 232 Recueil des Cours 4Google Scholar

Vogenauer, S., ‘Regulatory Competition through Choice of Contract Law and Choice of Forum in Europe: Theory and Evidence’ (2013) 21 European Review of Private Law 13Google Scholar

Vogenauer, S. (ed.), Commentary on the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (PICC) (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 2015)Google Scholar

Von Bar, L., The Theory and Practice of Private International Law (trans. Gillespie, G. R., W Green & Sons, 2nd edn, 1892)Google Scholar

von Hein, J., ‘Something Old and Something Borrowed, but Nothing New? Rome II and the European Choice-of-Law Evolution’ (2008) 82 Tulane Law Review 1663Google Scholar

von Mehren, A. T., ‘Review of Bernard Audit, Fraude à la loi’ (1977) 25 American Journal of Comparative Law 420Google Scholar

Voser, N., ‘Mandatory Rules of Law Applicable in International Commercial Arbitration’ (1996) 7 American Review of International Arbitration 319Google Scholar

Wai, R., ‘In the Name of the International: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Internationalist Transformation of Canadian Private International Law’ (2001) 39 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 117Google Scholar

Wai, R., ‘Transnational Liftoff and Juridical Touchdown: The Regulatory Function of Private International Law in an Era of Globalization’ (2002) 40 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 209Google Scholar

Weintraub, R. J., Commentary on the Conflict of Laws (Foundation Press, 5th edn, 2008)Google Scholar

Weller, M., ‘Mutual Trust: In Search of the Future of European Union Private International Law’ (2015) 11 Journal of Private International Law 64Google Scholar

Weller, M., ‘Choice of Court Agreements under Brussels Ia and under the Hague Convention: Coherences and Clashes’ (2017) 13 Journal of Private International Law 91Google Scholar

Westlake, J., A Treatise on Private International Law with Principal Reference to its Practice in England (W. Maxwell, 1880)Google Scholar

Westrik, R. and van der Weide, J. (eds.), Party Autonomy in International Property Law (Sellier, 2011)Google Scholar

Whincop, M. J. and Keyes, M., Policy and Pragmatism in the Conflict of Laws (Ashgate, 2001)Google Scholar

Wicker, W. H., ‘The Development of the Distinction between Local and Transitory Actions’ (1925) 4 Tennessee Law Review 55Google Scholar

Wilcke, A. J. and Wildhaber, I., ‘Arbitrating Labor Disputes in Switzerland’ (2010) 27 Journal of International Arbitration 631Google Scholar

Wilderspin, M., ‘The Rome I Regulation: Communitarisation and Modernisation of the Rome Convention’ (2008) 9 ERA Forum 259Google Scholar

Williams, P. R., ‘The EEC Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations’ (1986) 35 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1Google Scholar

Wilske, S., Shore, L., and Ahrens, J. M., ‘The “Group of Companies Doctrine” – Where is it heading?’ (2006) 17 American Review of International Arbitration 73Google Scholar

Wolff, M., Private International Law (Clarendon Press, 2nd edn, 1950)Google Scholar

Wright, M. J., ‘Enforcing Forum-Selection Clauses: An Examination of the Current Disarray of Federal Forum-Selection Clause Jurisprudence and a Proposal for Judicial Reform’ (2011) 44 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 1625Google Scholar

Xiao, Y. and Long, W., ‘Contractual Party Autonomy in Chinese Private International Law’ (2009) 11 Yearbook of Private International Law 193Google Scholar

Yackee, J. W., ‘A Matter of Good Form: The (Downsized) Hague Judgments Convention and Conditions of Formal Validity for the Enforcement of Forum Selection Agreements’ (2003) 53 Duke Law Journal 1179Google Scholar

Yackee, J. W., ‘Choice of Law Considerations in the Validity & Enforcement of International Forum Selection Agreements: Whose Law Applies?’ (2004) 9 UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 43Google Scholar

Yang, F., ‘Applicable Laws to Arbitration Agreements under Current Arbitration Law and Practice in Mainland China’ (2014) 63 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 741Google Scholar

Yeo, T. M., Choice of Law for Equitable Doctrines (Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Yetano, T. M., ‘The Constitutionalisation of Party Autonomy in European Family Law’ (2010) 6 Journal of Private International Law 155Google Scholar

Yntema, H. E., ‘“Autonomy” in Choice of Law’ (1952) 1 American Journal of Comparative Law 341Google Scholar

Yntema, H. E., ‘Contract and Conflict of Laws: “Autonomy” in Choice of Law in the United States’ (1955) 1 New York Law Forum 46Google Scholar

Yntema, H. E., ‘The Comity Doctrine’ (1966) 65 Michigan Law Review 9Google Scholar

Zekos, G., ‘Antitrust/Competition Arbitration in EU versus U.S. Law’ (2008) 25 Journal of International Arbitration 1Google Scholar

Zhang, M., ‘Party Autonomy and Beyond: An International Perspective of Contractual Choice of Law’ (2006) 20 Emory International Law Review 511Google Scholar

Zhang, M., ‘Choice of Law in Contracts: A Chinese Approach’ (2006) 26 Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 289Google Scholar

Zhang, M., ‘Codified Choice of Law in China: Rules, Processes and Theoretic Underpinnings’ (2011) 37 North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 83Google Scholar

Zhang, M., ‘Party Autonomy in Non-Contractual Obligations: Rome II and Its Impacts on Choice of Law’ (2011) 39 Seton Hall Law Review 861Google Scholar

Zumbansen, P., ‘Transnational Legal Pluralism’ (2010) 1 Transnational Legal Theory 141Google Scholar