Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:37:06.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Steven S. Smith
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 1980. Is the Revolt Fading? A Note on Party Loyalty Among Southern Democratic Congressmen. The Journal of Politics 42 (2):568–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1994. Issue Evolution Reconsidered: Racial Attitudes and Partisanship in the U.S. Electorate. American Journal of Political Science 38 (1):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agranoff, Robert. 1972. The New Style of Campaigning: The Decline of Party and the Rise of Candidate Centered Technology. In The New Style in Election Campaigns. Boston: Holbrook Press.Google Scholar
Albright, Spencer D. 1942. The American Ballot. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 1995. Theories of the Party in the Legislature and the Transition to Republican Rule in the House. In Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago, IL, August 31–September 3.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 1997. The Transition to Republican Rule in the House: Implications for Theories of Congressional Politics. Political Science Quarterly 112 (4):541–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 2000a. The Consequences of Party Organization in the House: The Role of the Majority and Minority Parties in Conditional Party Government. In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, edited by Bond, J. R. and Fleisher, R.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 2000b. The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee. Journal of Politics 62 (1):1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 2004. Congressional Committees in a Partisan era. In Congress Reconsidered, edited by Dodd, L. C. and Oppenheimer, B. I.. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H., Mark M. Berger, and David W. Rohde. 2002. The Historical Variability in Conditional Party Government, 1877–1994. In Parties, Procedure and Policy: Essays on the History of Congress, edited by Brady, D. and McCubbins, M.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen D. Jr., Snyder, James M., and Stewart, Charles III. 2001. The Effects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll-Call Voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly XXVI (4):533–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Stanley, and Smith, Steven S.. 1988. Managing Uncertainty in the House of Representatives: Adaptation and Innovation in Special Rules. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen. 1998. Congressional Party Leadership: Utilitarian versus Majoritarian Incentives. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (2):219–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behringer, Courtney L., and Evans, C. Lawrence. 2006. Parties, Preferences, and the House Whip Process. In Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 1996. The Partisan Basis of Procedural Choice: Allocating Parliamentary Rights in the House, 1789–1990. American Political Science Review 90 (1):8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 1997. Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 2006. Parties and Institutional Choice Revisited. Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (4):413–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., Lawrence, Eric, and Maltzman, Forrest. 1999. Uncovering the Hidden Effect of Party. Journal of Politics 61 (3):815–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., Lawrence, Eric, and Smith, Steven S.. 2002. Tracking the Filibuster. American Politics Research 30 (2):406–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., and Smith, Steven S.. 1997. Politics or Principle: Filibustering in the Senate. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committee and Elections. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolling, Richard Walker. 1974. Power in the House: A history of the leadership of the House of Representatives. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon R., and Fleisher, Richard. 1990. The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brady, David W. 1985. A Reevaluation of Realignments in American Politics: Evidence from the House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 79 (1):28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David W. 1988. Critical Elections and Congressional Policy-Making. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brady, David W., Brody, Richard, and Epstein, David. 1989. Heterogeneous Parties and Political Organization: The U.S. Senate, 1880–1920. Legislative Studies Quarterly 14 (2):205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David W., and Epstein, David. 1997. Intraparty Preferences, Heterogeneity, and the Origins of the Modern Congress: Progressive Reformers in the House and Senate, 1890–1920. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 13 (1):26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David W., and Lynn, Naomi B.. 1973. Switched-Seat Congressional Districts: Their Effect on Party Voting and Public Policy. American Journal of Political Science 17 (3):528–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David, and Sinclair, Barbara. 1984. Building Majorities for Policy Changes in the House of Representatives. Journal of Politics 46 (4):1033–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brams, Steven J., and O'Leary, Michael K. 1970. An Axiomatic Model of Voting Bodies. American Political Science Review 64 (2):449–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, George Rothwell. 1922. The leadership of Congress, by George Rothwell Brown. Indianapolis,: The Bobbs-Merrill company.Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles S. 1976. Motivations for U.S. Congressional Committee Preferences: Freshmen of the 92d Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 1:201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C., and Frisby, Tammy M.. 2004. Preferences, Partisanship, and Whip Activity in the U.S. House of Representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly XXIX (4):569–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, Randall L., and Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1994. Strategy and Sophisticated Voting in the Senate. Journal of Politics 56 (2):349–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles M. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caro, Robert A. 2002. The Years of Lyndon Johnson: Master of the Senate. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Chiu, Chang-Wei. 1928. The Speaker of the House of Representatives Since 1896. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Clausen, Aage R. 1967. The Measurement of Legislative Group Behavior. Midwest Journal of Political Science 11 (2):212–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, Aage R. 1973. How Congressmen Decide. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Clausen, Aage R., and Cheney, Richard B.. 1970. A Comparative Analysis of Senate House Voting on Economic and Welfare Policy: 1953–1964. The American Political Science Review 64 (1):138–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, Aage R., and Horn, Carl E.. 1977. The Congressional Response to a Decade of Change: 1963–1972. The Journal of Politics 39 (3):624–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data: A United Approach. American Political Science Review 98 (2):355–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3:1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey. 1981. The Dynamics of Party Voting in Congress, 1955–78: A Cohort Model. Political Behavior 3 (3):211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1987. Microfoundations and Macrosocial Behavior. In The Micro-Macro Link, edited by Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B., Munch, R., and Smelser, N. J.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph, and Brady, David. 1981. Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House From Cannon to Rayburn. American Political Science Review 75 (2):411–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Joseph, David W. Brady, and Patricia Hurley. 1977. The Electoral Basis of Party Voting: Patterns and Trends in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1887–1969. In The Impact of the Electoral Process, edited by Maisel, L. and Cooper, J.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Covington, Cary R. 1987. Mobilizing Congressional Support for the President: Insights from the 1960s. Legislative Studies Quarterly 12:77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 2001. Agenda Setting in the U.S. House: A Majority-Party Monopoly?Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (2):185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., Andrea Campbell, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2002. Agenda Power in the Senate, 1877 to 1986. In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, edited by Brady, D. W. and McCubbins, M. D.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. On the Decline of Party Voting in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (4):547–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1997. Toward a Theory of Legislative Rules Changes: Assessing Schickler and Rich's Evidence. American Journal of Political Science 41 (4):1376–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2002. Agenda Power in the US House of Representatives, 1877–1986. In Parties, Procedure and Policy: Essays on the History of Congress, edited by Brady, D. W. and McCubbins, M. D.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Poole, Keith T.. 2002. On Measuring Partisanship in Roll-Call Voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877–1999. American Journal of Political Science 46 (3):477–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Wilder Jr. 1960. A Caveat on Roll-Call Studies of Party Voting. Midwest Journal of Political Science 4 (3):237–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombez, Christophe, Krehbiel, Keith, and Groseclose, Tim. 2005. “Gatekeeping.” Journal of Politics 68 (2):322–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, Sara Brandes, and Hibbing, John R.. 1985. Congressional Reform and Party Discipline: The Effects of Changes in the Seniority System on Party Loyalty in the US House of Representatives. British Journal of Political Science 15 (2):207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Roger, and Oleszek, Walter. 1977. Congress Against Itself. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Otto A., and Melvin J. Hinich. 1966. A Mathematical Model of Policy Formation in a Democratic Society. In Mathematical Applications in Political Science II, edited by Bernd, J. L.. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Otto A., Hinich, Melvin J., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1970. An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process. American Political Science Review 64:426–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deckard, Barbara. 1976. Electoral Marginality and Party Loyalty in House Roll Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science 20 (3):469–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deering, Christopher J., and Smith, Steven S.. 1983. Changing Motives for Committee Preferences of New Members of the U.S. House. Legislative Studies Quarterly VIII (2):271–81.Google Scholar
Deschler, Lewis, Brown, Wm Holmes, and Cannon, Clarence. 1977. Deschler's Precedents of the United States House of Representatives. Washington, D.Cl.: Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.Google Scholar
Dion, Douglas. 1997. Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, Douglas, and Huber, John D.. 1996. Procedural Choice and the House Committee on Rules. Journal of Politics 58 (1):25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, Douglas, and Huber, John D.. 1997. Sense and Sensibility: The Role of Rules. American Journal of Political Science 41 (3):945–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C. 1977. Congress and the Quest for Power. In Congress Reconsidered, edited by Dodd, L. C. and Oppenheimer, B. I.. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C. 1978. The Expanded Roles of the House Democratic Whip Systems: The 93d and 94th Congresses. Congressional Studies 7:27–56.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C., and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. 1977. Congress Reconsidered. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C., and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. 1997. Congress Reconsidered. 6th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C., and Terry Sullivan. 1981. Majority Party Leadership and Partisan Vote Gathering: The House Democratic Whip System. In Understanding Congressional Leadership, edited by Mackaman, F. H.. Washington., D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Donald, David Herbert. 1996. Charles Sumner. 1st Da Capo Press ed. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. 1984. Presidential Party Leadership in Congress. In Presidents and Their Parties: Leadership or Neglect? edited by Harmel, R.. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. 1989. At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Lawrence, and Walter J. Oleszek. 1999. Procedural Features of House Republican Rule. In New Majority or Old Minority: the Impact of Republicans on Congress, edited by Rae, N. C. and Campbell, C. C.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fiellin, Alan. 1962. The Functions of Informal Groups in Legislative Institutions. Journal of Politics 24:72–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. New York: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Follett, Mary Parker. 1909. The Speaker of the House of Representatives. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Fox, Douglas M., and Clapp, Charles H.. 1970a. The House Rules Committee and the Programs of Kennedy and Johnson Administrations. Midwest Journal of Political Science 14 (4):667–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Douglas M., and Clapp, Charles H.. 1970b. The House Rules Committee's Agenda-Setting Function, 1961–1968. The Journal of Politics 32 (2):440–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohlich, Norman, Oppenheimer, Joe, and Young, Oran. 1971. Political Leadership and Collective Goods. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Froman, Lewis A. Jr., and Ripley, Randall B.. 1965. Conditions for Party Leadership: The Case of the House Democrats. American Political Science Review 59 (1):52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, George. 1969. History of the House of Representatives. New York: Thomas Crowell.Google Scholar
Gamm, Gerald, and Steven S. Smith. 1998. Last Among Equals: The Senate's Presiding Officer. Paper read at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, at Boston.
Gamm, Gerald, and Steven S. Smith. 2000. Last Among Equals: The Presiding Officer of the Senate. In Esteemed Colleagues: Civility and Deliberation in the United States Senate, edited by Loomis, B.. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Gamm, Gerald, and Steven S. Smith. 2002. The Emergence of Senate Party Leadership. In Senate Exceptionalism, edited by Oppenheimer, B. I.. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Greenstein, Fred I., and Jackson, Elton F.. 1963. A Second Look at the Validity of Roll-Call Analysis. Midwest Journal of Political Science 7 (2):156–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grumm, John G. 1965. The Systematic Analysis of Blocs in the Study of Legislative Behavior. Western Political Quarterly 18 (2):350–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hager, Gregory L., and Talbert, Jeffery C.. 2000. Look for the Party Label: Party Influences on Voting in the U.S. House. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (1):75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinich, Melvin J., and Enelow, James M.. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huitt, Ralph K. 1961. Democratic Party Leadership in the Senate. American Political Science Review 55:333–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, Mark S., Moiles, Roger J., and Rohde, David W.. 2001. Distributive and Partisan Issues in Agriculture Policy in the 104th House. American Political Science Review 95 (4):911–22.Google Scholar
Jackson, John E. 1971. Statistical Models of Senate Roll Call Voting. The American Political Science Review 65 (2):451–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John E., and Kingdon, John W.. 1992. Ideology, Interest Group Score, and Legislative Votes. American Journal of Political Science 36 (August):805–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Mathew O., and Moselle, Boaz. 2002. Coalition and Party Formation in a Legislative Voting Game. Journal of Economic Theory 103 (1):49–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles. 1961. Representation in Congress: The Case of the House Agriculture Committee. American Political Science Review 55 (June):358–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles O. 1970. The Minority Party in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Karabel, Jerome. 2005. The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Katz, Jonathan, and Sala, Brian. 1996. Careerism, Committee Assignments, and the Electoral Connection. American Political Science Review 90:21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 1986. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 1997. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kessel, John H. 1964. The Washington Congressional Delegation. Midwest Journal of Political Science 8:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, David C., and Zeckhauser, Richard J.. 2003. Congressional Vote Options. Legislative Studies Quarterly XXVIII (3):387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1973. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Koford, Kenneth. 1989. Dimensions in Congressional Voting. The American Political Science Review 83 (3):949–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1988. Spatial Models of Legislative Choice. Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (3):259–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. Where's the Party?British Journal of Political Science 23:235–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1995. Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z. American Journal of Political Science 39 (4):906–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1997a. Rejoinder to ‘Sense and Sensibility’. American Journal of Political Science 41:958–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1997b. Restrictive Rules Reconsidered. American Journal of Political Science 41 (July):919–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2000. Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship. American Journal of Political Science 44:212–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2003. Asymmetry in Party Influence: Reply. Political Analysis 11:108–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2005. Pivots. Stanford: Stanford University Graduate School of Business.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2006. Pivots. In Handbook of Political Economy, edited by Weingast, B. R. and Wittman, D.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith, Adam Meirowitz, and Jonathan Woon. 2005. Testing Theories of Lawmaking. In Social Choice and Strategic Decisions, edited by Austen-Smith, D. and Duggan, J.. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith, and Alan Wiseman. 1999. Joseph G. Cannon: Majoritarian from Illinois. Paper read at Conference on the History of Congress, January 15–16, at Stanford University.
Kuklinski, James H. 1977. District Competitiveness and Legislative Roll-Call Behavior: A Reassessment of the Marginality Hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science 21 (3):627–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., and Elling, Richard C.. 1977. Representational Role, Constituency Opinion, and Legislative Roll-Call Behavior. American Journal of Political Science 21 (1):135–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Eric D. 2004. Essays on Procedural Development in the U.S. Congress, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Lawrence, Eric, Maltzman, Forrest, and Smith, Steven S.. 2005. Changing Patterns of Party Effects in Congressional Voting. In Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Eric, Maltzman, Forrest, and Smith, Steven S.. 2006. Who Wins? Party Effects in Legislative Voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (1):33–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Eric, and Steven S. Smith. 1997. Party Control of Committees in the Republican Congress. In Congress Reconsidered, edited by Dodd, L. C. and Oppenheimer, B. I.. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Light, Paul C. 1983. The President's Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Carter. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lott, Trent. 2005. Herding Cats: A Life in Politics. New York: Regan Books.Google Scholar
Ludington, Arthur C. 1911. American Ballot Laws, 1888–1910, edited by N. Y. S. E. Department: University of the State of New York, Albany.
MacNeil, Neil. 1963. Forge of Democracy: The House of Representatives. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
MacRae, Duncan. 1958. Dimensions of Congressional Voting. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
MacRae, Duncan Jr. 1965. A Method for Identifying Issues and Factions From Legislative Votes. American Political Science Review 59 (4):909–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest. 1997. Competing Principals: Committees, Parties, and the Organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Bryan W. 2002. Explaining the Role of Restrictive Rules in the Postreform House. Legislative Studies Quarterly 27 (1):61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Andrew D. and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002. Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999. Political Analysis 10 (2):134–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Donald R., and Stimson, James A.. 1975. Yeas and Nays: Normal Decision-Making in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigating: 1946–1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress. American Political Science Review 95 (3):673–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustadt, Richard. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Nimmo, Dan. 1970. The Political Persuaders: The Techniques of Modern Election Campaigns. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Nokken, Timothy P. 2000. Dynamics of Congressional Loyalty: Party Defection and Roll-Call Behavior, 1947–97. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (3):417–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nokken, Timothy P., and Poole, Keith T.. 2004. Congressional Party Defection in American History. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (4):545–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oleszek, Walter J. 1985. Majority and Minority Whips of the Senate. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Olson, Mancur. 1966. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peabody, Robert L. 1963. The Enlarged Rules Committee. In New Perspectives on the House of Representatives, edited by Peabody, R. L. and Polsby, N. W.. Chicago: Rand McNally and Co.Google Scholar
Peabody, Robert L. 1976. Leadership in Congress: Stability, Succession, and Change. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T. 1988. Recent Developments in Analytical Models of Voting in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (1):117–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Daniels, R. Steven. 1985. Ideology, Party, and Voting in the U.S. Congress, 1959–1980. American Political Science Review 79 (2):373–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29 (2):357–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1991. Patterns of Congressional Voting. American Journal of Political Science 35 (1):228–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1996. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., Rosenthal, Howard, and Koford, Kenneth. 1991. On Dimensionalizing Roll Call Votes in the U.S. Congress. The American Political Science Review 85 (3):955–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Hugh Douglas. 1962. Race, Religion, and the Rules Committee: The Kennedy Aid-to-Education Bills. In The Uses of Power, edited by Westin, A. F.. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Ray, Bruce A., and Smith, Steven S.. 1983. The Impact of Congressional Reform: House Democratic Committee Assignments. Congress and The Presidency (Fall): 11–22.Google Scholar
Rice, Stuart A. 1924. Farmers and Workers in American Politics. Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
Rice, Stuart A. 1925. The Behavior of Legislative Groups: A Method of Measurement. Political Science Quarterly 40 (1):60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Stuart A. 1928. Quantitative Methods in Politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Ripley, Randall B. 1964. The Party Whip Organizations in the United States House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 58 (3):561–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, Randall B. 1967. Party Leaders in the House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Donald A. 1998. Minutes of the U.S. Senate Democratic Conference, 1903–1964. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Roberts, Jason M., and Steven S. Smith. Forthcoming. The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Institutions in Congress: Path Dependency in House and Senate Institutional Development. In Process, Party and Policy Making: New Advances in the Study of the History of Congress, edited by Brady, D. W. and Mccubbins, M. D.. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Roberts, Jason M., and Smith, Steven S.. 2003. Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000. American Journal of Political Science 47 (April):305–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James A. 1959. The Role of the Rules Committee in Arranging the Program of the U.S. House of Representatives. The Western Political Quarterly 12 (3):653–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James A. 1961. The Role of the Rules Committee in Regulating Debate in the U.S. House of Representatives. Midwest Journal of Political Science 5 (1):59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James A. 1963. The House Rules Committee. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1992. Electoral Forces, Political Agendas, and Partisanship in the House and Senate. In The Postreform Congress, edited by Davidson, R.. New York:. St. Martins Press.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1994. Parties and Committees in the House: Member Motivations, Issues, and Institutional Arrangements. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19 (3):341–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, David J. 1966. Politics and Power: The United States Senate, 1869–1901. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rybicki, Elizabeth, Steven S. Smith, and Ryan J. Vander Wielen. 2003. Congressional Conference Committee Bias, 1963–2002. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Philadelphia.
Sabato, Larry. 1981. The Rise of Political Consultants: New Ways of Winning Elections. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Thomas. 1989. Why Parties? Mimeo, University of California at Los Angeles.
Shannon, Wayne. 1968a. Electoral Margins and Voting Behavior in the House of Representatives: The Case of the Eighty-Sixth and Eighty-Seventh Congresses. The Journal of Politics 30 (4):1028–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Wayne. 1968b. Party, Constituency, and Congressional Voting. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1983. Regional Receptivity to Reform: The Legacy of the Progressive Era. Political Science Quarterly 98 (Fall):459–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1978. The Giant Jigsaw Puzzle: Democratic Committee Assignments in the Modern House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1984a. Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes With Implications for Agenda Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 28 (1):49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1984b. When Do Rules of Procedure Matter?Journal of Politics 46 (1):206–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1981a. Majority Party Leadership Strategies for Coping with the New U.S. House. Legislative Studies Quarterly 6 (3):391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1981b. The Speaker's Task Force in the Post-Reform House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 75 (2):397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1983. Majority Leadership in the U.S. House. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. House Majority Party Leadership in the Late 1980s. In Congress Reconsidered, edited by Dodd, L. D. and Oppenheimer, B. I.. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1994. House Special Rules and the Institutional Design Controversy. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19 (November):477–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1995a. House Special Rules and the Institutional Design Controversy. In Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions, edited by Shepsle, K. and Weingast, B.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1995b. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking: The U.S. House of Representatives in the Postreform Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 2000. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 2002. Do Parties Matter? In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, edited by Brady, D. W. and McCubbins, M. D.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 1982. The Budget Battles of 1981: The Role of the Majority Party Leadership. In American Politics and Public Policy, edited by Sindler, A. P.. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 1984. Coalition Leaders in Congress: A Theoretical Perspective. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association: Washington, DC.
Smith, Steven S. 1985. New Patterns of Decisionmaking in Congress. In The New Direction in American Politics, edited by Chubb, J. E. and Peterson, P. E.. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 2005. Parties and Leadership in the Senate. In The Legislative Branch, edited by Quirk, P. J. and Binder, S. A.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S., and Deering, Christopher J.. 1990. Committees in Congress. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S., and Flathman, Marcus. 1989. Managing the Senate Floor: Complex Unanimous Consent Agreements Since the 1950s. Legislative Studies Quarterly 14:349–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steven S., and Gerald Gamm. 2002. Emergence of the Modern Senate Party Organization, 1937–2002. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, Mass.
Smith, Steven S., Roberts, Jason M., and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2006. The American Congress. 4th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, James M., and Groseclose, Tim. 2000. Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, James M. Jr., and Groseclose, Tim. 2001. Estimating Party Influence on Roll Call Voting: Regression Coefficients versus Classification Success. American Political Science Review 95 (3):689–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, John L., and Uslaner, Eric M.. 1978. Congressional Behavior and Electoral Marginality. American Journal of Political Science 22:536–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Truman, David. 1956. The State Delegations and the Structure of Party Voting in the United States House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 50:1023–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, David B. 1959. The Congressional Party: A Case Study. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Turner, Julius. 1951. Party and Constituency: Pressures on Congress, Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and political science. Ser. 69, No. 1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Vander Wielen, Ryan. 2006. Conference Committees and Bias in Legislative Outcomes. Ph.D. Dissertation, Political Science, Washington University, St. Louis.
Wawro, Gregory J., and Schickler, Eric. 2004. Where's the Pivot? Obstruction and Lawmaking in the Pre-Cloture Senate. American Journal of Political Science 48 (4):758–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wawro, Gregory, and Schickler, Eric. 2006. Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate, Princeton Studies in American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Herbert F. 1972. Scaling Models for Legislative Roll-Call Analysis. American Political Science Review 66 (4):1306–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde, and Clausen, Aage R.. 1991. The Dimensionality of Roll-Call Voting Reconsidered. Legislative Studies Quarterly (August):393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeomans, Henry Aaron. 1948. Abbott Lawrence Lowell, 1856–1943. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Garry, and Vicky Wilkins. 2005. Vote Switchers and Party Influence in the U.S. House.
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1980. Is the Revolt Fading? A Note on Party Loyalty Among Southern Democratic Congressmen. The Journal of Politics 42 (2):568–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1994. Issue Evolution Reconsidered: Racial Attitudes and Partisanship in the U.S. Electorate. American Journal of Political Science 38 (1):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agranoff, Robert. 1972. The New Style of Campaigning: The Decline of Party and the Rise of Candidate Centered Technology. In The New Style in Election Campaigns. Boston: Holbrook Press.Google Scholar
Albright, Spencer D. 1942. The American Ballot. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Public Affairs.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 1995. Theories of the Party in the Legislature and the Transition to Republican Rule in the House. In Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago, IL, August 31–September 3.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 1997. The Transition to Republican Rule in the House: Implications for Theories of Congressional Politics. Political Science Quarterly 112 (4):541–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 2000a. The Consequences of Party Organization in the House: The Role of the Majority and Minority Parties in Conditional Party Government. In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, edited by Bond, J. R. and Fleisher, R.. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 2000b. The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee. Journal of Politics 62 (1):1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and David W. Rohde. 2004. Congressional Committees in a Partisan era. In Congress Reconsidered, edited by Dodd, L. C. and Oppenheimer, B. I.. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H., Mark M. Berger, and David W. Rohde. 2002. The Historical Variability in Conditional Party Government, 1877–1994. In Parties, Procedure and Policy: Essays on the History of Congress, edited by Brady, D. and McCubbins, M.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen D. Jr., Snyder, James M., and Stewart, Charles III. 2001. The Effects of Party and Preferences on Congressional Roll-Call Voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly XXVI (4):533–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Stanley, and Smith, Steven S.. 1988. Managing Uncertainty in the House of Representatives: Adaptation and Innovation in Special Rules. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen. 1998. Congressional Party Leadership: Utilitarian versus Majoritarian Incentives. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (2):219–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behringer, Courtney L., and Evans, C. Lawrence. 2006. Parties, Preferences, and the House Whip Process. In Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 1996. The Partisan Basis of Procedural Choice: Allocating Parliamentary Rights in the House, 1789–1990. American Political Science Review 90 (1):8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 1997. Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A. 2006. Parties and Institutional Choice Revisited. Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (4):413–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., Lawrence, Eric, and Maltzman, Forrest. 1999. Uncovering the Hidden Effect of Party. Journal of Politics 61 (3):815–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., Lawrence, Eric, and Smith, Steven S.. 2002. Tracking the Filibuster. American Politics Research 30 (2):406–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., and Smith, Steven S.. 1997. Politics or Principle: Filibustering in the Senate. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committee and Elections. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bolling, Richard Walker. 1974. Power in the House: A history of the leadership of the House of Representatives. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon R., and Fleisher, Richard. 1990. The President in the Legislative Arena. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brady, David W. 1985. A Reevaluation of Realignments in American Politics: Evidence from the House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 79 (1):28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David W. 1988. Critical Elections and Congressional Policy-Making. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Brady, David W., Brody, Richard, and Epstein, David. 1989. Heterogeneous Parties and Political Organization: The U.S. Senate, 1880–1920. Legislative Studies Quarterly 14 (2):205–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David W., and Epstein, David. 1997. Intraparty Preferences, Heterogeneity, and the Origins of the Modern Congress: Progressive Reformers in the House and Senate, 1890–1920. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 13 (1):26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David W., and Lynn, Naomi B.. 1973. Switched-Seat Congressional Districts: Their Effect on Party Voting and Public Policy. American Journal of Political Science 17 (3):528–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David, and Sinclair, Barbara. 1984. Building Majorities for Policy Changes in the House of Representatives. Journal of Politics 46 (4):1033–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brams, Steven J., and O'Leary, Michael K. 1970. An Axiomatic Model of Voting Bodies. American Political Science Review 64 (2):449–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, George Rothwell. 1922. The leadership of Congress, by George Rothwell Brown. Indianapolis,: The Bobbs-Merrill company.Google Scholar
Bullock, Charles S. 1976. Motivations for U.S. Congressional Committee Preferences: Freshmen of the 92d Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 1:201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C., and Frisby, Tammy M.. 2004. Preferences, Partisanship, and Whip Activity in the U.S. House of Representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly XXIX (4):569–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, Randall L., and Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1994. Strategy and Sophisticated Voting in the Senate. Journal of Politics 56 (2):349–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles M. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caro, Robert A. 2002. The Years of Lyndon Johnson: Master of the Senate. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Chiu, Chang-Wei. 1928. The Speaker of the House of Representatives Since 1896. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Clausen, Aage R. 1967. The Measurement of Legislative Group Behavior. Midwest Journal of Political Science 11 (2):212–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, Aage R. 1973. How Congressmen Decide. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Clausen, Aage R., and Cheney, Richard B.. 1970. A Comparative Analysis of Senate House Voting on Economic and Welfare Policy: 1953–1964. The American Political Science Review 64 (1):138–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, Aage R., and Horn, Carl E.. 1977. The Congressional Response to a Decade of Change: 1963–1972. The Journal of Politics 39 (3):624–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data: A United Approach. American Political Science Review 98 (2):355–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3:1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey. 1981. The Dynamics of Party Voting in Congress, 1955–78: A Cohort Model. Political Behavior 3 (3):211–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1987. Microfoundations and Macrosocial Behavior. In The Micro-Macro Link, edited by Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B., Munch, R., and Smelser, N. J.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, Joseph, and Brady, David. 1981. Institutional Context and Leadership Style: The House From Cannon to Rayburn. American Political Science Review 75 (2):411–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, Joseph, David W. Brady, and Patricia Hurley. 1977. The Electoral Basis of Party Voting: Patterns and Trends in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1887–1969. In The Impact of the Electoral Process, edited by Maisel, L. and Cooper, J.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Covington, Cary R. 1987. Mobilizing Congressional Support for the President: Insights from the 1960s. Legislative Studies Quarterly 12:77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W. 2001. Agenda Setting in the U.S. House: A Majority-Party Monopoly?Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (2):185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., Andrea Campbell, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2002. Agenda Power in the Senate, 1877 to 1986. In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, edited by Brady, D. W. and McCubbins, M. D.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. On the Decline of Party Voting in Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16 (4):547–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1997. Toward a Theory of Legislative Rules Changes: Assessing Schickler and Rich's Evidence. American Journal of Political Science 41 (4):1376–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2002. Agenda Power in the US House of Representatives, 1877–1986. In Parties, Procedure and Policy: Essays on the History of Congress, edited by Brady, D. W. and McCubbins, M. D.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Poole, Keith T.. 2002. On Measuring Partisanship in Roll-Call Voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877–1999. American Journal of Political Science 46 (3):477–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Wilder Jr. 1960. A Caveat on Roll-Call Studies of Party Voting. Midwest Journal of Political Science 4 (3):237–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombez, Christophe, Krehbiel, Keith, and Groseclose, Tim. 2005. “Gatekeeping.” Journal of Politics 68 (2):322–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, Sara Brandes, and Hibbing, John R.. 1985. Congressional Reform and Party Discipline: The Effects of Changes in the Seniority System on Party Loyalty in the US House of Representatives. British Journal of Political Science 15 (2):207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Roger, and Oleszek, Walter. 1977. Congress Against Itself. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Otto A., and Melvin J. Hinich. 1966. A Mathematical Model of Policy Formation in a Democratic Society. In Mathematical Applications in Political Science II, edited by Bernd, J. L.. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Otto A., Hinich, Melvin J., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1970. An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process. American Political Science Review 64:426–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deckard, Barbara. 1976. Electoral Marginality and Party Loyalty in House Roll Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science 20 (3):469–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deering, Christopher J., and Smith, Steven S.. 1983. Changing Motives for Committee Preferences of New Members of the U.S. House. Legislative Studies Quarterly VIII (2):271–81.Google Scholar
Deschler, Lewis, Brown, Wm Holmes, and Cannon, Clarence. 1977. Deschler's Precedents of the United States House of Representatives. Washington, D.Cl.: Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.Google Scholar
Dion, Douglas. 1997. Turning the Legislative Thumbscrew. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, Douglas, and Huber, John D.. 1996. Procedural Choice and the House Committee on Rules. Journal of Politics 58 (1):25–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, Douglas, and Huber, John D.. 1997. Sense and Sensibility: The Role of Rules. American Journal of Political Science 41 (3):945–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C. 1977. Congress and the Quest for Power. In Congress Reconsidered, edited by Dodd, L. C. and Oppenheimer, B. I.. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C. 1978. The Expanded Roles of the House Democratic Whip Systems: The 93d and 94th Congresses. Congressional Studies 7:27–56.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C., and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. 1977. Congress Reconsidered. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C., and Oppenheimer, Bruce I.. 1997. Congress Reconsidered. 6th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Dodd, Lawrence C., and Terry Sullivan. 1981. Majority Party Leadership and Partisan Vote Gathering: The House Democratic Whip System. In Understanding Congressional Leadership, edited by Mackaman, F. H.. Washington., D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Donald, David Herbert. 1996. Charles Sumner. 1st Da Capo Press ed. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. 1984. Presidential Party Leadership in Congress. In Presidents and Their Parties: Leadership or Neglect? edited by Harmel, R.. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Edwards, George C. 1989. At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, C. Lawrence, and Walter J. Oleszek. 1999. Procedural Features of House Republican Rule. In New Majority or Old Minority: the Impact of Republicans on Congress, edited by Rae, N. C. and Campbell, C. C.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fiellin, Alan. 1962. The Functions of Informal Groups in Legislative Institutions. Journal of Politics 24:72–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. New York: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
Follett, Mary Parker. 1909. The Speaker of the House of Representatives. New York: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Fox, Douglas M., and Clapp, Charles H.. 1970a. The House Rules Committee and the Programs of Kennedy and Johnson Administrations. Midwest Journal of Political Science 14 (4):667–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Douglas M., and Clapp, Charles H.. 1970b. The House Rules Committee's Agenda-Setting Function, 1961–1968. The Journal of Politics 32 (2):440–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frohlich, Norman, Oppenheimer, Joe, and Young, Oran. 1971. Political Leadership and Collective Goods. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Froman, Lewis A. Jr., and Ripley, Randall B.. 1965. Conditions for Party Leadership: The Case of the House Democrats. American Political Science Review 59 (1):52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, George. 1969. History of the House of Representatives. New York: Thomas Crowell.Google Scholar
Gamm, Gerald, and Steven S. Smith. 1998. Last Among Equals: The Senate's Presiding Officer. Paper read at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, at Boston.
Gamm, Gerald, and Steven S. Smith. 2000. Last Among Equals: The Presiding Officer of the Senate. In Esteemed Colleagues: Civility and Deliberation in the United States Senate, edited by Loomis, B.. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Gamm, Gerald, and Steven S. Smith. 2002. The Emergence of Senate Party Leadership. In Senate Exceptionalism, edited by Oppenheimer, B. I.. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Greenstein, Fred I., and Jackson, Elton F.. 1963. A Second Look at the Validity of Roll-Call Analysis. Midwest Journal of Political Science 7 (2):156–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grumm, John G. 1965. The Systematic Analysis of Blocs in the Study of Legislative Behavior. Western Political Quarterly 18 (2):350–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hager, Gregory L., and Talbert, Jeffery C.. 2000. Look for the Party Label: Party Influences on Voting in the U.S. House. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (1):75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinich, Melvin J., and Enelow, James M.. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huitt, Ralph K. 1961. Democratic Party Leadership in the Senate. American Political Science Review 55:333–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, Mark S., Moiles, Roger J., and Rohde, David W.. 2001. Distributive and Partisan Issues in Agriculture Policy in the 104th House. American Political Science Review 95 (4):911–22.Google Scholar
Jackson, John E. 1971. Statistical Models of Senate Roll Call Voting. The American Political Science Review 65 (2):451–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John E., and Kingdon, John W.. 1992. Ideology, Interest Group Score, and Legislative Votes. American Journal of Political Science 36 (August):805–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Mathew O., and Moselle, Boaz. 2002. Coalition and Party Formation in a Legislative Voting Game. Journal of Economic Theory 103 (1):49–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles. 1961. Representation in Congress: The Case of the House Agriculture Committee. American Political Science Review 55 (June):358–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Charles O. 1970. The Minority Party in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Karabel, Jerome. 2005. The Chosen: The Hidden History of Admission and Exclusion at Harvard, Yale, and Princeton. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Katz, Jonathan, and Sala, Brian. 1996. Careerism, Committee Assignments, and the Electoral Connection. American Political Science Review 90:21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 1986. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 1997. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kessel, John H. 1964. The Washington Congressional Delegation. Midwest Journal of Political Science 8:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
King, David C., and Zeckhauser, Richard J.. 2003. Congressional Vote Options. Legislative Studies Quarterly XXVIII (3):387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1973. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Koford, Kenneth. 1989. Dimensions in Congressional Voting. The American Political Science Review 83 (3):949–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1988. Spatial Models of Legislative Choice. Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (3):259–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. Where's the Party?British Journal of Political Science 23:235–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1995. Cosponsors and Wafflers from A to Z. American Journal of Political Science 39 (4):906–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1997a. Rejoinder to ‘Sense and Sensibility’. American Journal of Political Science 41:958–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1997b. Restrictive Rules Reconsidered. American Journal of Political Science 41 (July):919–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2000. Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship. American Journal of Political Science 44:212–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2003. Asymmetry in Party Influence: Reply. Political Analysis 11:108–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2005. Pivots. Stanford: Stanford University Graduate School of Business.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 2006. Pivots. In Handbook of Political Economy, edited by Weingast, B. R. and Wittman, D.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith, Adam Meirowitz, and Jonathan Woon. 2005. Testing Theories of Lawmaking. In Social Choice and Strategic Decisions, edited by Austen-Smith, D. and Duggan, J.. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith, and Alan Wiseman. 1999. Joseph G. Cannon: Majoritarian from Illinois. Paper read at Conference on the History of Congress, January 15–16, at Stanford University.
Kuklinski, James H. 1977. District Competitiveness and Legislative Roll-Call Behavior: A Reassessment of the Marginality Hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science 21 (3):627–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, James H., and Elling, Richard C.. 1977. Representational Role, Constituency Opinion, and Legislative Roll-Call Behavior. American Journal of Political Science 21 (1):135–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Eric D. 2004. Essays on Procedural Development in the U.S. Congress, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota.
Lawrence, Eric, Maltzman, Forrest, and Smith, Steven S.. 2005. Changing Patterns of Party Effects in Congressional Voting. In Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Eric, Maltzman, Forrest, and Smith, Steven S.. 2006. Who Wins? Party Effects in Legislative Voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly 31 (1):33–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, Eric, and Steven S. Smith. 1997. Party Control of Committees in the Republican Congress. In Congress Reconsidered, edited by Dodd, L. C. and Oppenheimer, B. I.. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Light, Paul C. 1983. The President's Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Carter. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lott, Trent. 2005. Herding Cats: A Life in Politics. New York: Regan Books.Google Scholar
Ludington, Arthur C. 1911. American Ballot Laws, 1888–1910, edited by N. Y. S. E. Department: University of the State of New York, Albany.
MacNeil, Neil. 1963. Forge of Democracy: The House of Representatives. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
MacRae, Duncan. 1958. Dimensions of Congressional Voting. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
MacRae, Duncan Jr. 1965. A Method for Identifying Issues and Factions From Legislative Votes. American Political Science Review 59 (4):909–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest. 1997. Competing Principals: Committees, Parties, and the Organization of Congress. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Bryan W. 2002. Explaining the Role of Restrictive Rules in the Postreform House. Legislative Studies Quarterly 27 (1):61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Andrew D. and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002. Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999. Political Analysis 10 (2):134–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Donald R., and Stimson, James A.. 1975. Yeas and Nays: Normal Decision-Making in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigating: 1946–1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress. American Political Science Review 95 (3):673–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustadt, Richard. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Nimmo, Dan. 1970. The Political Persuaders: The Techniques of Modern Election Campaigns. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Nokken, Timothy P. 2000. Dynamics of Congressional Loyalty: Party Defection and Roll-Call Behavior, 1947–97. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (3):417–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nokken, Timothy P., and Poole, Keith T.. 2004. Congressional Party Defection in American History. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (4):545–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oleszek, Walter J. 1985. Majority and Minority Whips of the Senate. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Olson, Mancur. 1966. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peabody, Robert L. 1963. The Enlarged Rules Committee. In New Perspectives on the House of Representatives, edited by Peabody, R. L. and Polsby, N. W.. Chicago: Rand McNally and Co.Google Scholar
Peabody, Robert L. 1976. Leadership in Congress: Stability, Succession, and Change. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T. 1988. Recent Developments in Analytical Models of Voting in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 13 (1):117–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Daniels, R. Steven. 1985. Ideology, Party, and Voting in the U.S. Congress, 1959–1980. American Political Science Review 79 (2):373–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29 (2):357–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1991. Patterns of Congressional Voting. American Journal of Political Science 35 (1):228–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1996. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., Rosenthal, Howard, and Koford, Kenneth. 1991. On Dimensionalizing Roll Call Votes in the U.S. Congress. The American Political Science Review 85 (3):955–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Hugh Douglas. 1962. Race, Religion, and the Rules Committee: The Kennedy Aid-to-Education Bills. In The Uses of Power, edited by Westin, A. F.. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Ray, Bruce A., and Smith, Steven S.. 1983. The Impact of Congressional Reform: House Democratic Committee Assignments. Congress and The Presidency (Fall): 11–22.Google Scholar
Rice, Stuart A. 1924. Farmers and Workers in American Politics. Ph.D. Dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
Rice, Stuart A. 1925. The Behavior of Legislative Groups: A Method of Measurement. Political Science Quarterly 40 (1):60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Stuart A. 1928. Quantitative Methods in Politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Ripley, Randall B. 1964. The Party Whip Organizations in the United States House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 58 (3):561–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripley, Randall B. 1967. Party Leaders in the House of Representatives. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Ritchie, Donald A. 1998. Minutes of the U.S. Senate Democratic Conference, 1903–1964. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
Roberts, Jason M., and Steven S. Smith. Forthcoming. The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Institutions in Congress: Path Dependency in House and Senate Institutional Development. In Process, Party and Policy Making: New Advances in the Study of the History of Congress, edited by Brady, D. W. and Mccubbins, M. D.. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Roberts, Jason M., and Smith, Steven S.. 2003. Procedural Contexts, Party Strategy, and Conditional Party Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1971–2000. American Journal of Political Science 47 (April):305–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James A. 1959. The Role of the Rules Committee in Arranging the Program of the U.S. House of Representatives. The Western Political Quarterly 12 (3):653–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James A. 1961. The Role of the Rules Committee in Regulating Debate in the U.S. House of Representatives. Midwest Journal of Political Science 5 (1):59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James A. 1963. The House Rules Committee. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1992. Electoral Forces, Political Agendas, and Partisanship in the House and Senate. In The Postreform Congress, edited by Davidson, R.. New York:. St. Martins Press.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W. 1994. Parties and Committees in the House: Member Motivations, Issues, and Institutional Arrangements. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19 (3):341–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothman, David J. 1966. Politics and Power: The United States Senate, 1869–1901. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rybicki, Elizabeth, Steven S. Smith, and Ryan J. Vander Wielen. 2003. Congressional Conference Committee Bias, 1963–2002. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Philadelphia.
Sabato, Larry. 1981. The Rise of Political Consultants: New Ways of Winning Elections. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Thomas. 1989. Why Parties? Mimeo, University of California at Los Angeles.
Shannon, Wayne. 1968a. Electoral Margins and Voting Behavior in the House of Representatives: The Case of the Eighty-Sixth and Eighty-Seventh Congresses. The Journal of Politics 30 (4):1028–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Wayne. 1968b. Party, Constituency, and Congressional Voting. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1983. Regional Receptivity to Reform: The Legacy of the Progressive Era. Political Science Quarterly 98 (Fall):459–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1978. The Giant Jigsaw Puzzle: Democratic Committee Assignments in the Modern House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1984a. Uncovered Sets and Sophisticated Voting Outcomes With Implications for Agenda Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 28 (1):49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1984b. When Do Rules of Procedure Matter?Journal of Politics 46 (1):206–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1981a. Majority Party Leadership Strategies for Coping with the New U.S. House. Legislative Studies Quarterly 6 (3):391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1981b. The Speaker's Task Force in the Post-Reform House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 75 (2):397–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1983. Majority Leadership in the U.S. House. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1989. House Majority Party Leadership in the Late 1980s. In Congress Reconsidered, edited by Dodd, L. D. and Oppenheimer, B. I.. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1994. House Special Rules and the Institutional Design Controversy. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19 (November):477–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1995a. House Special Rules and the Institutional Design Controversy. In Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions, edited by Shepsle, K. and Weingast, B.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1995b. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking: The U.S. House of Representatives in the Postreform Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 2000. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 2002. Do Parties Matter? In Party, Process, and Political Change in Congress: New Perspectives on the History of Congress, edited by Brady, D. W. and McCubbins, M. D.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 1982. The Budget Battles of 1981: The Role of the Majority Party Leadership. In American Politics and Public Policy, edited by Sindler, A. P.. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 1984. Coalition Leaders in Congress: A Theoretical Perspective. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association: Washington, DC.
Smith, Steven S. 1985. New Patterns of Decisionmaking in Congress. In The New Direction in American Politics, edited by Chubb, J. E. and Peterson, P. E.. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S. 2005. Parties and Leadership in the Senate. In The Legislative Branch, edited by Quirk, P. J. and Binder, S. A.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S., and Deering, Christopher J.. 1990. Committees in Congress. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven S., and Flathman, Marcus. 1989. Managing the Senate Floor: Complex Unanimous Consent Agreements Since the 1950s. Legislative Studies Quarterly 14:349–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steven S., and Gerald Gamm. 2002. Emergence of the Modern Senate Party Organization, 1937–2002. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, Mass.
Smith, Steven S., Roberts, Jason M., and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2006. The American Congress. 4th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, James M., and Groseclose, Tim. 2000. Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2):193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, James M. Jr., and Groseclose, Tim. 2001. Estimating Party Influence on Roll Call Voting: Regression Coefficients versus Classification Success. American Political Science Review 95 (3):689–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, John L., and Uslaner, Eric M.. 1978. Congressional Behavior and Electoral Marginality. American Journal of Political Science 22:536–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Truman, David. 1956. The State Delegations and the Structure of Party Voting in the United States House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 50:1023–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, David B. 1959. The Congressional Party: A Case Study. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Turner, Julius. 1951. Party and Constituency: Pressures on Congress, Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and political science. Ser. 69, No. 1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Vander Wielen, Ryan. 2006. Conference Committees and Bias in Legislative Outcomes. Ph.D. Dissertation, Political Science, Washington University, St. Louis.
Wawro, Gregory J., and Schickler, Eric. 2004. Where's the Pivot? Obstruction and Lawmaking in the Pre-Cloture Senate. American Journal of Political Science 48 (4):758–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wawro, Gregory, and Schickler, Eric. 2006. Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate, Princeton Studies in American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Herbert F. 1972. Scaling Models for Legislative Roll-Call Analysis. American Political Science Review 66 (4):1306–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, Clyde, and Clausen, Aage R.. 1991. The Dimensionality of Roll-Call Voting Reconsidered. Legislative Studies Quarterly (August):393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeomans, Henry Aaron. 1948. Abbott Lawrence Lowell, 1856–1943. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Garry, and Vicky Wilkins. 2005. Vote Switchers and Party Influence in the U.S. House.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Steven S. Smith, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Party Influence in Congress
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812613.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Steven S. Smith, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Party Influence in Congress
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812613.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Steven S. Smith, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Party Influence in Congress
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812613.010
Available formats
×