Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2013
The present is confusing because we do not really understand the past.
Our understandings of politics evolve. At one time – much of the first half of the 1900s– it was widely understood that presidential and House election results were closely tiedtogether. The partisan votes for presidential and House candidates in House districts were verysimilar, and we presumed that voting was primarily for a party and not individuals. Then in the1960s the relationship between presidential and House results declined. By the 1970s a newinterpretation emerged about what was dominating elections and how the presidential–Houseconnection was being altered. The conclusion was that House elections were becoming dominated byincumbency, elections were candidate-centered, and parties were of less relevance in voting choices.House incumbents were becoming more immune to shifts in partisan presidential electoral support inthe nation. The conventional wisdom quickly became that we were witnessing a diminished capabilityfor elections to simultaneously register voter sentiment in the institutions of the presidency andthe House.
[The House elections of the 1960s represent] a set of electoral arrangements that is…quiteunresponsive to shifts in the preferences of voters. (1973)
Incumbents have become quite effectively insulated from the electoral effects, for example, ofadverse presidential landslides. As a result, a once-notable phenomenon, the so-called coattailseffect, has virtually been eliminated. (1975)
The incumbency advantage in House races has increased to such a level during the last decade thatthe electoral outcomes for president and Congress have become virtually independent. (1983)
Voting in congressional elections has become detached from broad national currents reflectingreactions to the president and national issues and problems. (1985)
No matter which party wins the White House each four years, presidential elections seem to havelittle impact on the partisan balance in Congress. The discrepancy between presidential andcongressional election results is frequently attributed…to a decline in presidentialcoattails. (1995)
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.