Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T20:40:07.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Spongiotic Dermatitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2017

Asok Biswas
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, A.B., Schiff, T.A. (1996). If small plaque (digitate) parapsoriasis is a cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, even an ‘abortive’ one, it must be mycosis fungoides! Arch Dermatol, 132, 562566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altekrueger, I., Ackerman, A.B. (1994). ‘Eczema revisited’. A status report based upon current textbooks of dermatology. Am J Dermatopathol, 16, 517522.Google Scholar
Bonamonte, D., Foti, C., Vestita, M, et al. (2012). Nummular eczema and contact allergy: a retrospective study. Dermatitis, 23, 153157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonamonte, D., Foti, C., Vestita, M., et al. (2013). Noneczematous contact dermatitis. ISRN Allergy. Sep 15;2013:361746. doi: 10.1155/2013/361746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, J.C. (2009). An update on pityriasis rosea and other similar childhood exanthems. Curr Opin Pediatr, 21, 481485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crotty, C., Pittelkow, M., Muller, S.A. (1983). Eosinophilic spongiosis: a clinicopathologic review of seventy-one cases. J Am Acad Dermatol, 8, 337343.Google Scholar
Dessinioti, C., Katsambas, A. (2013). Seborrheic dermatitis: etiology, risk factors, and treatments: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol, 31, 343351.Google Scholar
Drago, F., Broccolo, F., Rebora, A. (2009). Pityriasis rosea: an update with a critical appraisal of its possible herpesviral etiology. J Am Acad Dermatol, 61, 303318.Google Scholar
Eckert, F. (1991). Histopathologic and immunohistological aspects of atopic eczema. In Ruzicka, T., Ring, J., Przybilla, B., eds. Handbook of atopic eczema. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp 127131.Google Scholar
Emmerson, R.W., Wilson-Jones, E. (1968). Eosinophilic spongiosis in pemphigus. A report of an unusual histological change in pemphigus. Arch Dermatol, 97, 252257.Google Scholar
George, M., Carr, R.A, Gee, B.C. (2010). Acroangiodermatitis of Mali. Clin Exp Dermatol, 35, e94-e96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González, L.M., Allen, R., Janniger, C.K., Schwartz, R.A. (2005). Pityriasis rosea: an important papulosquamous disorder. Int J Dermatol, 44, 757764.Google Scholar
Goon, A., Goh, C-L. (2011). Noneczematous contact reactions. In Johansen, J.D., Frosch, P.J., Lepoittevin, J-P., eds. Contact dermatitis. 5th edn. Berlin: Springer, pp 415426.Google Scholar
Hanifin, J. M., Rajka, G. (1980). Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh), 92, 4447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawamura, T., Fukuda, S., Ohtake, N., et al. (1996). Lichen planus-like contact dermatitis due to methacrylic acid esters. Br J Dermatol, 134, 358360.Google Scholar
Keller, E.C., Tomecki, K.J., Alraies, M.C.. (2012). Distinguishing cellulitis from its mimics. Cleve Clin J Med, 2012, 79, 547552.Google Scholar
Knackstedt, T.J., Zug, K.A. (2015). T cell lymphomatoid contact dermatitis: a challenging case and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis, 72, 6574.Google Scholar
LeBoit, P.E., Epstein, B.A. (1990). A vase-like shape characterizes the epidermal-mononuclear cell collections seen in spongiotic dermatitis. Am J Dermatopathol, 12, 612616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-Morán, C., Sanz-Muñoz, C., Morales-Callaghan, A.M., et al. (2009). Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 60, 5355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosbaum, A., Vocanson, M., Rozieres, A. et al. (2009). Allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Eur J Dermatol, 19, 325332.Google Scholar
Orbaneja, J.G., Diez, L.I., Lozano, J.L., et al. (1976). Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis: a syndrome produced by epicutaneous hypersensitivity with clinical features and a histopathologic picture similar to that of mycosis fungoides. Contact Dermatitis, 2, 139143.Google Scholar
Parsons, J.M. (1986). Pityriasis rosea update. J Am Acad Dermatol, 15, 159167.Google Scholar
Phelps, R.G., Miller, M.K., Singh, F. (2003). The varieties of “eczema”: clinicopathologic correlation. Clin Dermatol, 21, 95100.Google Scholar
Rietschel, R.L., Ray, M.C. (1988). Nonatopic eczemas. J Am Acad Dermatol, 18, 569573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudikoff, D. (2011). Differential diagnosis of round or discoid lesions. Clin Dermatol, 29, 489497.Google Scholar
Ruiz, E., Deng, J-S., Abell, E.A. (1994). Eosinophilic spongiosis: a clinical, histologic, and immunopathologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol, 30, 973976.Google Scholar
Russell Jones, R. (1982). Spongiosis – a passive phenomenon? J Am Acad Dermatol, 6, 547549.Google Scholar
Sampaio, A.L., Mameri, A.C., Vargas, T.J., et al. (2011). Seborrheic dermatitis. An Bras Dermatol, 86, 10611071.Google Scholar
Soeprono, F.F., Schinella, R.A., Cockerell, C.J., et al. (1986). Seborrheic-like dermatitis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome: a clinicopathologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol, 14, 242248.Google Scholar
Somach, S.C., Helm, T.N., Lawlor, K.B., et al. (1993). Pretibial mucin. Histologic patterns and clinical correlation. Arch Dermatol, 129, 11521156.Google Scholar
Sterry, W. (2000). Thoughts about parapsoriasis. Dermatopathology: Practical & Conceptual, 6, 5254.Google Scholar
Strohal, R., Rappersberger, K., Perhamberger, H., et al. (1993). Nonbullous pemphigoid: prodrome of bullous pemphigoid or a distinct pemphigoid variant? J Am Acad Dermatol, 29, 293299.Google Scholar
Wollina, U. (2008). Pompholyx: what’s new? Expert Opin Investig Drugs, 17, 897904.Google Scholar
Yi, J.U., Lee, C.W. (1990). Acroangiodermatitis. A clinical variant of stasis dermatitis. Int J Dermatol, 29, 515516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×