Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T00:09:24.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Modal structure and reliable inference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

A. Jepson
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
W. Richards
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
D. C. Knill
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
David C. Knill
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Whitman Richards
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The world we live in is a very structured place. Matter does not flit about in space and time in a completely unorganized fashion, but rather is organized by the physical forces, biological processes, social interactions, and so on which exist in our world (McMahon, 1975; Thompson, 1952). It is this structure, or regularity, which makes it possible for us to make reliable inferences about our surroundings from the signals taken in from various senses (Marr, 1982; Witkin and Tenenbaum, 1983). In other words, regularities in the world make sense data reliably informative about the world we move around in. But what is the nature of these regularities, and how can they be used for the purposes of perception?

In this chapter, we consider one class of environmental regularities which arise from what we call the modal structure of the world and which has the effect of making sensory information for certain types of perceptual judgements highly reliable (Bobick and Richards, 1986). Our definition of modal regularities is motivated by careful analyses of some simple examples of reliable perceptual inferences. Given the resulting definition, we then briefly discuss some of the implications for the knowledge required of a perceiver in order for it to make reliable inferences in the presence of such modal structure.

Modal structure: An example

When can we infer that an object is stationary?

A common perceptual inference is that of whether an object is moving or at rest. How can we make this inference given only the two-dimensional projection of a three-dimensional object?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×