Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Umemura, Hiroyuki 2017. Causal Context Presented in Subsequent Event Modifies the Perceived Timing of Cause and Effect. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8, Issue. ,

    Hoffman, Donald D and Singh, Manish 2012. Computational Evolutionary Perception. Perception, Vol. 41, Issue. 9, p. 1073.

    Kankanhalli, M.S. Wang, J. and Jain, R. 2006. Experiential Sampling in Multimedia Systems. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, Vol. 8, Issue. 5, p. 937.

    Torralba, Antonio and Oliva, Aude 2003. Statistics of natural image categories. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, Vol. 14, Issue. 3, p. 391.

    Torralba, A. and Oliva, A. 2002. Depth estimation from image structure. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 24, Issue. 9, p. 1226.

    feldman, Jacob 2001. Bayesian contour integration. Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 63, Issue. 7, p. 1171.

    Vasconcelos, N. and Lippman, A. 2001. Empirical Bayesian motion segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 217.

    Burns, Kevin J 2001. Mental Models of Line Drawings. Perception, Vol. 30, Issue. 10, p. 1249.

    Langer, M.S. and Mann, R. 2001. Dimensional analysis of image motion. Vol. 1, Issue. , p. 155.

    Jepson, A. and Mann, R. 1999. Qualitative probabilities for image interpretation. p. 1123.

    Kersten, Daniel Mamassian, Pascal and Knill, David C 1997. Moving Cast Shadows Induce Apparent Motion in Depth. Perception, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 171.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1996
  • Online publication date: March 2012

2 - Modal structure and reliable inference

Summary

Introduction

The world we live in is a very structured place. Matter does not flit about in space and time in a completely unorganized fashion, but rather is organized by the physical forces, biological processes, social interactions, and so on which exist in our world (McMahon, 1975; Thompson, 1952). It is this structure, or regularity, which makes it possible for us to make reliable inferences about our surroundings from the signals taken in from various senses (Marr, 1982; Witkin and Tenenbaum, 1983). In other words, regularities in the world make sense data reliably informative about the world we move around in. But what is the nature of these regularities, and how can they be used for the purposes of perception?

In this chapter, we consider one class of environmental regularities which arise from what we call the modal structure of the world and which has the effect of making sensory information for certain types of perceptual judgements highly reliable (Bobick and Richards, 1986). Our definition of modal regularities is motivated by careful analyses of some simple examples of reliable perceptual inferences. Given the resulting definition, we then briefly discuss some of the implications for the knowledge required of a perceiver in order for it to make reliable inferences in the presence of such modal structure.

Modal structure: An example

When can we infer that an object is stationary?

A common perceptual inference is that of whether an object is moving or at rest. How can we make this inference given only the two-dimensional projection of a three-dimensional object?

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Perception as Bayesian Inference
  • Online ISBN: 9780511984037
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511984037
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×