Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:08:19.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Transmitting Arrays, Network Analysis, and Pattern Overlap Integrals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2018

Karl F. Warnick
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Rob Maaskant
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg
Marianna V. Ivashina
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenberg
David B. Davidson
Affiliation:
Curtin University, Perth
Brian D. Jeffs
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Get access

Summary

The classical approach to array antenna analysis is to represent the field radiated by the array as a product of the radiation pattern of one element and an array factor that includes the locations and excitations of each element in the array. This approach has been used for many decades to design phased arrays for many applications, from radar and terrestrial communications to satellite systems and radio telescopes.

For high performance receiving arrays, the approximate factorization of the array radiation pattern into an element pattern and array factor may not be accurate enough to use when designing for stringent performance requirements. Mutual coupling causes element radiation patterns to differ across the array, and this must be taken into account in the design process from the beginning. For this reason, we will only briefly consider the classical array factor technique in this chapter, and move instead to a more sophisticated analysis method based on overlap integrals and network theory.

The array factor method certainly has enduring value. The array factor provides an intuitive way to analyze, understand, visualize, and design steered beams and array radiation pattern. It can be taught in a simple way to students of array theory, yet is useful in designing highly sophisticated multiantenna systems. Optimal designs, such as the Chebyshev array, can be readily treated within this framework.

For the high sensitivity applications of interest in this book, the array factor method is only useful for rough designs, and a more advanced approach is needed. The overlap integral and network theory approach comes at a price. It relies on numerical approximations or full wave simulations of embedded element patterns, and is not amenable to pencil and paper treatments. The analysis methodology used in this book is intended from the ground up to be used with numerical methods and optimization tools. As a middle ground between the array factor method and full wave numerical modeling, we will also develop the lossless, resonant, minimum scattering approximation.

The standard approach to antenna theory is to treat transmitting antennas first, followed by the receiving case. After reviewing the classical array factor method and other basic concepts of simple array antennas, we will develop the overlap integral and network theory first for a transmitting array.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] L., Lechtreck, “Effects of coupling accumulation in antenna arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 1968.Google Scholar
[2] W., Kahn, “Active reflection coefficient and element efficiency in arbitrary antenna arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 653–654, 1969.Google Scholar
[3] W., Kahn, “Element efficiency: A unifying concept for array antennas,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 48–56, Aug. 2007.Google Scholar
[4] H., Wheeler, “The grating-lobe series for the impedance variation in a planar phased-array antenna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 707–714, 1966.Google Scholar
[5] W., Wasylkiwskyj and W., Kahn, “Mutual coupling and element efficiency for infinite linear arrays,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 1901–1907, 1968.Google Scholar
[6] T. S., Bird, Fundamentals of Aperture Antennas and Arrays: From Theory to Design, Fabrication and Testing. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.Google Scholar
[7] D. M., Pozar, “The active element pattern,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1176–1178, 1994.Google Scholar
[8] P. W., Hannan, “The element-gain paradox for a phased-array antenna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 423–433, Jul. 1964.Google Scholar
[9] S., Stein, “On cross coupling in multiple-beam antennas,” IRE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 10, pp. 548–557, Sep. 1962.Google Scholar
[10] D. F., Kelley and W. L., Stutzman, “Array antenna pattern modeling methods that include mutual coupling effects,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1625–1632, 1993.Google Scholar
[11] D. F., Kelley, “Relationships between active element patterns and mutual impedance matrices in phased array antennas,” in Proc. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (AP-S), vol. 1, 2002, pp. 524–527.Google Scholar
[12] D. M., Pozar, “A relation between the active input impedance and the active element pattern of a phased array,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 2486–2489, 2003.Google Scholar
[13] D. F., Kelley, “Embedded element patterns and mutual impedance matrices in the terminated phased array environment,” in Proc. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (AP-S), vol. 3, 2005, pp. 659–662.Google Scholar
[14] S., Henault and Y., Antar, “Unifying the theory of mutual coupling compensation in antenna arrays,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 104–122, 2015.Google Scholar
[15] C., Craeye, B., Parvais, and X., Dardenne, “MoM simulation of signal-to-noise patterns in infinite and finite receiving antenna arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 3245–3256, Dec. 2004.Google Scholar
[16] E. E. M., Woestenburg, “Noise matching in dense phased arrays,” ASTRON, Dwingeloo, The Netherlands, Tech. Rep. RP-083, Aug. 2005.Google Scholar
[17] S. G., Hay, “Maximum-sensitivity matching of connected-array antennas subject to Lange noise constants,” International Journal of Microwave and Optical Technology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 375–383, 2010.Google Scholar
[18] C., Craeye and D., González-Ovejero, “A review on array mutual coupling analysis,” Radio Science, vol. 46, no. 2, 2011.Google Scholar
[19] R., Maaskant, E. E. M., Woestenburg, and M. J., Arts, “A generalized method of modeling the sensitivity of array antennas at system level,” in Proc. European Microwave Conference, Amsterdam, Oct. 2004, pp. 1541–1544.Google Scholar
[20] K. F., Warnick and M. A., Jensen, “Optimal noise matching for mutually-coupled arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1726–1731, Jun. 2007.Google Scholar
[21] M., Ivashina, “Dutch FPA progress –characterization of efficiency, system noise temperature and sensitivity of focal plane arrays,” in Deep Surveys of the Radio Universe with SKA Pathfinders, Perth, Australia, Apr. 2008.
[22] K. F., Warnick and B. D., Jeffs, “Efficiencies and system temperature for a beamforming array,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 7, pp. 565–568, Jun. 2008.Google Scholar
[23] K. F., Warnick, B., Woestenburg, L., Belostotski, and P., Russer, “Minimizing the noise penalty due to mutual coupling for a receiving array,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1634–1644, Jun. 2009.Google Scholar
[24] J. W., Wallace and M. A., Jensen, “Mutual coupling in MIMO wireless systems: A rigorous network theory analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1317–1325, 2004.Google Scholar
[25] C., Findeklee, “Array noise matching –generalization, proof and analogy to power matching,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 452–459, 2011.Google Scholar
[26] R., Hansen and D., Gammon, “Standing waves in scan impedance of finite scanned arrays,” Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 175–179, 1995.Google Scholar
[27] R., Hansen, “Comments on ‘the active element pattern’,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 43, no. 6, p. 634, 1995.
[28] J., Diao, High Sensitivity Phased Arrays for Radio Astronomy and Satellite Communications, PhD thesis, Brigham Young University, 2017.Google Scholar
[29] K. F., Warnick, Numerical Methods for Engineering: An Introduction Using MATLAB and Computational Electromagnetics Examples. Rayleigh, NC: Sci-Tech, 2011.Google Scholar
[30] C. G., Kakoyiannis, “Post-processing accuracy enhancement of the improved Wheeler cap for wideband antenna efficiency measurements,” in Proc. European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 2014, pp. 342–346.Google Scholar
[31] Z., Yang and K. F., Warnick, “Analysis and design of intrinsically dual circular polarized microstrip antennas using an equivalent circuit model and Jones matrix formulation,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3858–3868, 2016.Google Scholar
[32] L., Belostotski, A., Sutinjo, R. H., Johnston, et al., “Study of thermal noise generated in a Vivaldi antenna using the improved Wheeler cap method,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 10, pp. 1047–1050, 2011.Google Scholar
[33] J., Diao and K. F., Warnick, “Antenna loss and receiving efficiency for mutually coupled arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 5871–5877, 2017.Google Scholar
[34] R., Maaskant, D. J., Bekers, M. J., Arts, W. A. van, Cappellen, and M. V., Ivashina, “Evaluation of the radiation efficiency and the noise temperature of low-loss antennas,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 8, pp. 1166–1170, 2009.Google Scholar
[35] W., Kahn and H., Kurss, “Minimum-scattering antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 671–675, 1965.Google Scholar
[36] P., Rogers, “Application of the minimum scattering antenna theory to mismatched antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1223–1228, 1986.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×