Neill, Jeremy 2017. The Gauthier Contract: Applicable or Not?. Res Publica, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 1.
Claassen, Rutger 2017. An Agency-Based Capability Theory of Justice. European Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 1279.
Pélabay, Janie 2017. Communitarian equality: to each according to their contribution to the group identity. International Social Science Journal,
Wardrope, Alistair 2016. Reinterpreting Respect for Relationally and Biologically Informed Autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 50.
Miller, Seumas 2016. Assertions, joint epistemic actions and social practices. Synthese, Vol. 193, Issue. 1, p. 71.
Steigleder, Klaus 2016. Climate risks, climate economics, and the foundations of rights-based risk ethics. Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 15, Issue. 2, p. 251.
Gibson, Howard 2015. Between the state and the individual: ‘Big Society’ communitarianism and English Conservative rhetoric. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 40.
Sundström, Mikael and Fernández, Christian 2013. Citizenship education and diversity in liberal societies: Theory and policy in a comparative perspective. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 103.
Gürsel, Esra Demir 2013. The Distinction Between the Freedom of Religion and the Right to Manifest Religion. Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 377.
Hirvonen, Onni 2012. Taylor and the problem of recognizing cultural groups. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 109.
Dionigi, Filippo 2012. Islamism as Communitarianism: Person, Community and the Problem of International Norms in Non-Liberal Theories. Journal of International Political Theory, Vol. 8, Issue. 1-2, p. 74.
Neculau, Radu 2012. Being Oneself in Another: Recognition and the Culturalist Deformation of Identity. Inquiry, Vol. 55, Issue. 2, p. 148.
I would like to examine the issue of political atomism, or at least to try to clarify what this issue is. I want to say what I think atomist doctrines consist in, and to examine how the issue can be joined around them – this is, how they might be proved or disproved, or at least cogently argued for or against, and what in turn they may be used to prove.
The term ‘atomism’ is used loosely to characterize the doctrines of social contract theory which arose in the seventeenth century and also successor doctrines which may not have made use of the notion of social contract but which inherited a vision of society as in some sense constituted by individuals for the fulfilment of ends which were primarily individual. Certain forms of utilitarianism are successor doctrines in this sense. The term is also applied to contemporary doctrines which hark back to social contract theory, or which try to defend in some sense the priority of the individual and his rights over society, or which present a purely instrumental view of society.
Of course, any term loosely used in political discourse can be defined in a host of ways. And perhaps one should even leave out of philosophical discourse altogether those terms which tend to be branded as epithets of condemnation in the battle between different views. One might well argue that ‘atomism’ is one such, because it seems to be used almost exclusively by its enemies.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.