Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 35
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Neill, Jeremy 2017. The Gauthier Contract: Applicable or Not?. Res Publica, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    Tang, Siufu 2017. Reconceptualizing Confucian Philosophy in the 21st Century. p. 427.

    Steigleder, Klaus 2017. Handbuch Verantwortung. p. 171.

    Cummiskey, David 2017. Buddhist Philosophy. p. 205.

    Steigleder, Klaus 2016. Handbuch Verantwortung. p. 1.

    Wardrope, Alistair 2016. Reinterpreting Respect for Relationally and Biologically Informed Autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 50.


    Cowden, Mhairi 2016. Children’s Rights. p. 25.

    Claassen, Rutger 2016. An Agency-Based Capability Theory of Justice. European Journal of Philosophy,


    Miller, Seumas 2016. Assertions, joint epistemic actions and social practices. Synthese, Vol. 193, Issue. 1, p. 71.


    Steigleder, Klaus 2016. Climate risks, climate economics, and the foundations of rights-based risk ethics. Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 15, Issue. 2, p. 251.


    Gibson, Howard 2015. Between the state and the individual: ‘Big Society’ communitarianism and English Conservative rhetoric. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 40.


    Ognjenović, Gorana and Jozelić, Jasna 2014. Politicization of Religion, the Power of State, Nation, and Faith. p. 1.

    Gürsel, Esra Demir 2013. The Distinction Between the Freedom of Religion and the Right to Manifest Religion. Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 377.


    McCabe, David 2013. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.

    McCabe, David 2013. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.

    Neculau, Radu 2012. Being Oneself in Another: Recognition and the Culturalist Deformation of Identity. Inquiry, Vol. 55, Issue. 2, p. 148.


    Loobuyck, Patrick 2012. Creating mutual identification and solidarity in highly diversified societies. The importance of identification by shared participation. South African Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 560.


    van der Vossen, Bas 2011. Associative Political Obligations. Philosophy Compass, Vol. 6, Issue. 7, p. 477.


    Swaine, Lucas 2010. Toleration, Respect and Recognition in Education. p. 68.

    Swaine, Lucas 2010. Heteronomous Citizenship: Civic virtue and the chains of autonomy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 42, Issue. 1, p. 73.


    ×
  • Print publication year: 1985
  • Online publication date: June 2012

7 - Atomism

Summary

I would like to examine the issue of political atomism, or at least to try to clarify what this issue is. I want to say what I think atomist doctrines consist in, and to examine how the issue can be joined around them – this is, how they might be proved or disproved, or at least cogently argued for or against, and what in turn they may be used to prove.

The term ‘atomism’ is used loosely to characterize the doctrines of social contract theory which arose in the seventeenth century and also successor doctrines which may not have made use of the notion of social contract but which inherited a vision of society as in some sense constituted by individuals for the fulfilment of ends which were primarily individual. Certain forms of utilitarianism are successor doctrines in this sense. The term is also applied to contemporary doctrines which hark back to social contract theory, or which try to defend in some sense the priority of the individual and his rights over society, or which present a purely instrumental view of society.

Of course, any term loosely used in political discourse can be defined in a host of ways. And perhaps one should even leave out of philosophical discourse altogether those terms which tend to be branded as epithets of condemnation in the battle between different views. One might well argue that ‘atomism’ is one such, because it seems to be used almost exclusively by its enemies.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Philosophical Papers
  • Online ISBN: 9781139173490
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173490
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×