Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 46
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Lohmann, Friedrich 2019. Eine Theologie der Menschenrechte. p. 47.

    Peetush, Ashwani 2018. Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman. Vol. 24, Issue. , p. 235.

    Pilkington, Bryan C 2018. Distinguishing Deference from Deferment: Assisted Suicide Is the Wrong Response. Christian bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality, Vol. 24, Issue. 1, p. 59.

    Claassen, Rutger 2018. Capabilities in a Just Society.

    Claassen, Rutger 2017. An Agency-Based Capability Theory of Justice. European Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 1279.

    Pélabay, Janie 2017. Communitarian equality: to each according to their contribution to the group identity. International Social Science Journal, Vol. 67, Issue. 223-224, p. 21.

    Neill, Jeremy 2017. The Gauthier Contract: Applicable or Not?. Res Publica, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Steigleder, Klaus 2017. Handbuch Verantwortung. p. 171.

    Tang, Siufu 2017. Reconceptualizing Confucian Philosophy in the 21st Century. p. 427.

    Cummiskey, David 2017. Buddhist Philosophy. p. 205.

    Wardrope, Alistair 2016. Reinterpreting Respect for Relationally and Biologically Informed Autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 50.

    Cowden, Mhairi 2016. Children’s Rights. p. 25.

    Steigleder, Klaus 2016. Climate risks, climate economics, and the foundations of rights-based risk ethics. Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 15, Issue. 2, p. 251.

    Steigleder, Klaus 2016. Handbuch Verantwortung. p. 1.

    Miller, Seumas 2016. Assertions, joint epistemic actions and social practices. Synthese, Vol. 193, Issue. 1, p. 71.

    Gibson, Howard 2015. Between the state and the individual: ‘Big Society’ communitarianism and English Conservative rhetoric. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 40.

    Ognjenović, Gorana and Jozelić, Jasna 2014. Politicization of Religion, the Power of State, Nation, and Faith. p. 1.

    Gürsel, Esra Demir 2013. The Distinction Between the Freedom of Religion and the Right to Manifest Religion. Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 377.

    McCabe, David 2013. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.

    Sundström, Mikael and Fernández, Christian 2013. Citizenship education and diversity in liberal societies: Theory and policy in a comparative perspective. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 103.

  • Print publication year: 1985
  • Online publication date: June 2012

7 - Atomism


I would like to examine the issue of political atomism, or at least to try to clarify what this issue is. I want to say what I think atomist doctrines consist in, and to examine how the issue can be joined around them – this is, how they might be proved or disproved, or at least cogently argued for or against, and what in turn they may be used to prove.

The term ‘atomism’ is used loosely to characterize the doctrines of social contract theory which arose in the seventeenth century and also successor doctrines which may not have made use of the notion of social contract but which inherited a vision of society as in some sense constituted by individuals for the fulfilment of ends which were primarily individual. Certain forms of utilitarianism are successor doctrines in this sense. The term is also applied to contemporary doctrines which hark back to social contract theory, or which try to defend in some sense the priority of the individual and his rights over society, or which present a purely instrumental view of society.

Of course, any term loosely used in political discourse can be defined in a host of ways. And perhaps one should even leave out of philosophical discourse altogether those terms which tend to be branded as epithets of condemnation in the battle between different views. One might well argue that ‘atomism’ is one such, because it seems to be used almost exclusively by its enemies.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Philosophical Papers
  • Online ISBN: 9781139173490
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *