Skip to main content
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 50
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Brand, Sophie and Ernestus, Mirjam 2018. Listeners’ processing of a given reduced word pronunciation variant directly reflects their exposure to this variant: Evidence from native listeners and learners of French. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 71, Issue. 5, p. 1240.

    Dmitrieva, Olga 2018. The Role of Perception in the Typology of Geminate Consonants: Effects of Manner of Articulation, Segmental Environment, Position, and Stress. Language and Speech, Vol. 61, Issue. 1, p. 43.

    Daland, Robert Oh, Mira and Davidson, Lisa 2018. On the relation between speech perception and loanword adaptation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory,

    Schwartz, Geoffrey and Dzierla, Jerzy 2018. Polish listeners’ perception of vowel inherent spectral change in L2 English. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, Vol. 54, Issue. 2, p. 307.

    Trecca, Fabio McCauley, Stewart M. Andersen, Sofie Riis Bleses, Dorthe Basbøll, Hans Højen, Anders Madsen, Thomas O. Ribu, Ingeborg Sophie Bjønness and Christiansen, Morten H. 2018. Segmentation of Highly Vocalic Speech Via Statistical Learning: Initial Results From Danish, Norwegian, and English. Language Learning,

    Baese-Berk, Melissa M. Dilley, Laura C. Henry, Molly J. Vinke, Louis and Banzina, Elina 2018. Not just a function of function words: Distal speech rate influences perception of prosodically weak syllables. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,

    Bennett, Ryan Tang, Kevin and Ajsivinac Sian, Juan 2018. Statistical and acoustic effects on the perception of stop consonants in Kaqchikel (Mayan). Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 9.

    Spinu, Laura 2018. Investigating the status of a rare cross-linguistic contrast: The case of Romanian palatalized postalveolars. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 143, Issue. 3, p. 1235.

    Storme, Benjamin 2018. The adaptation of French liquids in Haitian. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, Vol. 33, Issue. 2, p. 386.

    Cooke, Martin and Garcia Lecumberri, Maria Luisa 2018. Effects of exposure to noise during perceptual training of non-native language sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 143, Issue. 5, p. 2602.

    Zukoff, Sam 2017. The Reduplicative System of Ancient Greek and a New Analysis of Attic Reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 48, Issue. 3, p. 459.

    Eger, Nikola Anna and Reinisch, Eva 2017. THE ROLE OF ACOUSTIC CUES AND LISTENER PROFICIENCY IN THE PERCEPTION OF ACCENT IN NONNATIVE SOUNDS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, p. 1.

    Scheidiger, Christoph Allen, Jont B. and Dau, Torsten 2017. Assessing the efficacy of hearing-aid amplification using a phoneme test. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 141, Issue. 3, p. 1739.

    Parker, Steve 2017. Sounding out Sonority. Language and Linguistics Compass, Vol. 11, Issue. 9, p. e12248.

    Beguš, Gašper 2017. Effects of ejective stops on preceding vowel duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 142, Issue. 4, p. 2168.

    Nakai, Satsuki and Scobbie, James M. 2016. The VOT Category Boundary in Word-Initial Stops: Counter-Evidence Against Rate Normalization in English Spontaneous Speech. Laboratory Phonology, Vol. 7, Issue. 1,

    Yu, Alan C. L. 2016. Vowel-dependent variation in Cantonese /s/ from an individual-difference perspective. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 139, Issue. 4, p. 1672.

    Stanton, Juliet 2016. Predicting distributional restrictions on prenasalized stops. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Vol. 34, Issue. 3, p. 1089.

    Schwartz, Geoffrey 2016. Word boundaries in L2 speech: Evidence from Polish learners of English. Second Language Research, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 397.

    Archer, Stephanie L. Zamuner, Tania Engel, Kathleen Fais, Laurel and Curtin, Suzanne 2016. Infants’ Discrimination of Consonants: Interplay Between Word Position and Acoustic Saliency. Language Learning and Development, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 60.

  • Print publication year: 2004
  • Online publication date: October 2009

2 - A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness



Much recent work in phonological theory has highlighted the role that perception plays in phonological processes. The perceptual basis of contrasts and features has been explored by Flemming (1995/2002), Gordon (1999), and Kirchner (1997) among others. Other work has highlighted the role that perception can play in motivating constraints. In this approach, phonological processes such as positional neutralisation, gemination, and assimilation are motivated by interactions between the strength of perceptual cues and some notion of articulatory ease (Jun 1995; Kirchner 2000; Silverman 1997; Steriade 1995). While some would argue that permitting perceptually motivated constraints to play a role in phonological grammar introduces a prohibitive level of complexity into analyses, the (re)introduction of functionally motivated constraints permits the unification of previously disparate analyses, and in the work cited above it has reduced the number of ad hoc stipulations and exceptions necessary to capture the pattern.

The time seems ripe to revise one of the most widely used, and yet one of the most problematic, constraints in phonological theory: the Sonority Sequencing Constraint. It is almost universally recognised that the Sonority Sequencing Constraint is plagued with exceptions (see Clements 1990 for discussion) and yet most of the efforts to reform it have ended in stipulative patches rather than real improvement. The lack of success in reformulating the Sonority Sequencing Constraint stems at least in part from its greatest flaw: it lacks an explicit, unified phonetic characterisation. Previous efforts at motivating the Sonority Sequencing Constraint on typological grounds have been criticised for their lack of explanatory power and can be seen as circular in their reasoning.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Phonetically Based Phonology
  • Online ISBN: 9780511486401
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *