Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T12:39:14.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Phonetics of Stop Voicing in Heritage and Homeland Polish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2024

By
Naomi Nagy ,
Paulina Łyskawa ,
Emily Moran  and
Mateusz Urban
Edited by
Rajiv Rao
Rajiv Rao
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Get access

Summary

We investigate acoustic correlates of the laryngeal contrast in intervocalic stops in three speech communities – homeland Polish speakers and first- and second-generation heritage Polish speakers in Toronto. Using a sample of 1,187 tokens extracted from conversational speech, we show that the employment of some parameters signaling laryngeal contrast differs between the homeland and heritage speakers. Some parameters are suppressed (i.e., closure phonation and duration) and some are amplified (i.e., vowel and release duration). We interpret these processes in light of proposals by Flege and Bohn (2021) and Polinsky (2018) regarding contact-induced interaction (i.e., assimilation versus dissimilation between languages). We propose that the interaction between systems occurs at a low level of granularity, that is, at the level of individual phonetic properties of a single phoneme.

Keywords

assimilationCanadadissimilationHeritage Language Variation and Change Corpuslaryngeal contrastPolishsociophoneticsvoicing
Type
Chapter
Information
The Phonetics and Phonology of Heritage Languages , pp. 321 - 342
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2019). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1.05. www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.Google Scholar
Chen, M. (1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica, 22(3), 129–159. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, J. S., Kim, H., Choi, H., & Hasegawa-Johnson, M. (2007). Prosodic effects on acoustic cues to stop voicing and place of articulation: Evidence from Radio News speech. Journal of Phonetics, 35(2), 180–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2006.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coretta, S. (2019). An exploratory study of voicing-related differences in vowel duration as compensatory temporal adjustment in Italian and Polish. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 125. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cribari-Neto, F., & Zeileis, A. (2010). Beta regression in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 34(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v034.i02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, T. H., & House, A. S. (1988). Segmental durations in connected‐speech signals: Current results. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83(4), 1553–1573. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, L. (2016). Variability in the implementation of voicing in American English obstruents. Journal of Phonetics, 54, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, L. (2018). Phonation and laryngeal specification in American English voiceless obstruents. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 48(3), 331–356. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100317000330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S., & Van Summers, W. (1989). Vowel length and closure duration in word-medial VC sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 17(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095–4470(19)30449-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, K. (2004). Stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus in English: Patterns of variation in vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics, 32(4), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, G. J. (1992). The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110872637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douma, J. C., & Weedon, J. T. (2019). Analysing continuous proportions in ecology and evolution: A practical introduction to beta and Dirichlet regression. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 10(9), 1412–1430. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eager, C. (2015). Automated voicing analysis in Praat: Statistically equivalent to manual segmentation. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. The University of Glasgow. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/proceedings.html.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In Wayland, R. (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108886901.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. A., Sramko, V., Ostry, D. J., Rowland, S. A., & Hallé, P. (2008). Cross language phonetic influences on the speech of French–English bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 36(4), 649–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2008.04.001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frąckowiak-Richter, L. (1973). The duration of Polish vowels. In Jassem, W. (Ed.), Speech analysis and synthesis (Vol. 3, pp. 87–115). Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
House, A. S., & Fairbanks, G. (1953). The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, P. A. (1980). A phonetic study of a voicing contrast in Polish (Publication No. 8111121) [Doctoral dissertation, Brown University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Google Scholar
Keating, P., Mikoś, M. J., & Ganong III, W. F. (1981). A cross-language study of range of voice onset time in the perception of initial stop voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70, 1261–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konopska, L., & Sawicki, J. (2013). Studies of the VOT parameter in realizations of Polish voiceless and voiced plosive phonemes. Logopedia, 42, 101–122.Google Scholar
Kopczyński, A. (1977). Polish and American English consonant phonemes: A contrastive study. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Lein, T., Kupisch, T., & van de Weijer, J. (2016). Voice onset time and global foreign accent in German–French simultaneous bilinguals during adulthood. International Journal of Bilingualism, 20(6), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006915589424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L. (1957). Closure duration and intervocalic voiced–voiceless distinction in English. Language, 33(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/410949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. WORD, 20(3), 384–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1964.11659830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1967). Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech, 10(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096701000101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Łukaszewicz, B., & Rozborski, B. (2008). Korelaty akustyczne akcentu wyrazowego w języku polskim dorosłych i dzieci [Acoustic correlates of Polish word stress for adults and children]. Prace Filologiczne, 54, 265–284.Google Scholar
Łyskawa, P., Maddeaux, R., Melara, E., & Nagy, N. (2016). Heritage speakers follow all the rules: Language contact and convergence in Polish devoicing. Heritage Language Journal, 13(2), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.13.2.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, N. (2011). A multilingual corpus to explore geographic variation. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 43(1–2), 65–84.Google Scholar
Nagy, N., & Kochetov, A. (2013). Voice onset time across the generations: A cross-linguistic study of contact-induced change. In Siemund, P., Gogolin, I., Schulz, M. E., & Davydova, J. (Eds.), Multilingualism and language diversity in urban areas: Acquisition, identities, space, education (pp. 19–38). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/hsld.1.02nag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, M. (2018). Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107252349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Raphael, L. J., Tobin, Y., Faber, A., Most, T., Kollia, H. B., & Milstein, D. (1995). Intermediate values of voice onset time. In Bell-Berti, F. & Raphael, L. J. (Eds.), Producing speech: Contemporary issues: For Katherine Safford Harris (pp. 117–127). American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Richter, L. (1976). The duration of Polish consonants. In Jassem, W. (Ed.), Speech analysis and synthesis (Vol. 4, pp. 219–238). Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Simonet, M., Casillas, J., & Díaz, Y. (2014). The effects of stress/accent on VOT depend on language (English, Spanish), consonant (/d/, /t/) and linguistic experience (monolinguals, bilinguals). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2014, 202–206. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2014-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slowiaczek, L. M., & Dinnsen, D. A. (1985). On the neutralizing status of Polish word-final devoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 13(3), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095–4470(19)30763-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. (2012). Phonetic and perceptual variation of word-final stops in Toronto English [Generals paper, University of Toronto]. www.academia.edu/4225196/Phonetic_and_Perceptual_Variation_of_Word_Final_Stops_in_Toronto_English.Google Scholar
Smithson, M., & Verkuilen, J. (2006). A better lemon squeezer? Maximum-likelihood regression with beta-distributed dependent variables. Psychological Methods, 11(1), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082–989X.11.1.54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Święciński, R. (2014). The phonological status of the palatal glide in Polish: A study in laboratory phonology. In Cyran, E. & Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. (Eds.), Crossing phonetics–phonology lines (pp. 365–402). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Tanner, J., Sonderegger, M., Stuart-Smith, J., & Fruehwald, J. (2020). Toward “English” phonetics: Variability in the pre-consonantal voicing effect across English dialects and speakers. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3, Article 38.1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trawińska, A. (2013). Charakterystyka polskich zwartych z uwagi na VOT [VOT characteristics of Polish stops]. In Cychnerska, A. (Ed.), Sandhi w językach słowiańskich (pp. 183–198). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.Google Scholar
Waniek-Klimczak, E. (2005). Temporal parameters in second language speech: An applied linguistic phonetics approach. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.Google Scholar
Waniek-Klimczak, E. (2009). Sociolinguistic conditioning of phonetic category realisation in non-native speech. Research in Language, 7, 149–166. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015–009-0010-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojtkowiak, E., & Schwartz, G. (2019). Prosody–segment interaction in the acoustics of Polish plosives. In Calhoun, S., Escudero, P., Tabain, M., & Warren, P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019 (pp. 3285–3289). Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2000). Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728900000225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×