Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T17:35:51.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The Human Plague

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2017

Stephen Emmott
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Jonathan L. Heeney
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Sven Friedemann
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Get access

Summary

It is now beyond reasonable doubt that we are the drivers of almost every global problem we face and that every one of these problems is set to grow, as we continue to grow., Can we say that humans constitute a ‘plague’. Well, it turns out that this is not too ridiculous a comparison to make. The term ‘plague’ is thought to originate from the Latin plāga (‘blow’), or what we would now call an ‘infection’ of a host by disease-causing agents. This includes the rapid multiplication of such organisms and their actions on the host, and the reaction of the host to these organisms and the toxins they produce. I argue the analogous case; that we humans are agents who, through our rapid multiplication and our actions, are now starting to have a deleterious impact on our host, our planet. As a consequence, there is now an emerging reaction of our host to us and our actions.

Just over 200 years ago, there were fewer than a billion humans living on Earth. When I was born in 1960, there were three billion. In 2015, the human population has more than doubled to over seven billion people, and the UN projections expect that there will be ten billion humans on earth sometime towards the end of this century. This is if, optimistically, fertility rates continue to decline as they have done over the last fifty years. It is worth mentioning that this fifty-year decline in fertility rate, which many are keen to point out as a counter-claim to the argument that we have a problem, is actually slowing. It is also worth highlighting that if the current fertility rate were to continue unchanged (which the United Nations defines as the ‘constant fertility variant’), the global population at the end of this century would not be ten billion people, but will be twenty-eight billion.

With this in mind, I should point out that the UN population statistics have been systematically revised upwards over the past decade. The ‘peak’ population under the ‘expected scenario’ in 2100 was under ten billion. It is now over 11 billion according to estimates at the time of writing (Figure 8.1).

Type
Chapter
Information
Plagues , pp. 184 - 195
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P.J., McNeill, J. (2011) The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society 369:842–67. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0327.Google Scholar
2. Rockström, J. et al. (2009) Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14(2). Retrieved from: www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/. Accessed 5 May 2015.Google Scholar
3. U.S. Census Bureau (USCB). (n.d.). World Population: Historical Estimates of World Population. Retrieved from: www.census.gov/population/international/data/worldpop/table_history.php. Accessed 5 May 2015.
4. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. Retrieved from: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/index.htm. Accessed 5 May 2015.
5. Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision. Retrieved from: http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/. Accessed 5 May 2015.
6. Haberl, et al. (2007) Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science 104(31):12942–7. DOI: 19.1073/pnas.0704243104.Google Scholar
7. Foley, et al. (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1111772.Google Scholar
8. Foley, et al. (2007) Our share of the planetary pie. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, 104(31):12585–6. DOI: 10.1073pnas.0705190104.Google Scholar
9. Tilman, et al. (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science 108(50):20260–4. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1116437108.Google Scholar
10. Fisher, et al. (2012) Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature 484:186–94. DOI: 10.1038/nature10947.Google Scholar
11. UN World Water Development Report 4 (WWDR4). Retrieved from: www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/water/wwap/wwdr/wwdr4-2012/. Accessed 5 May 2015.
12. Hoekstra, Mekonnen (2012) The water footprint of humanity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109:3232–7. DOI: 10.1073/pnas. 1109936109.Google Scholar
13. Earth System Research Laboratory: Global Monitoring Division. Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Retrieved from: www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/. Accessed 5 May 2015.
14. Data from NASA GISS Surface Temperature (GISTEMP) Analysis obtained from http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/temp/hansen/graphics.html. Accessed 5 May 2015.
15. From Levitus, S. et al. (2012) World ocean heat content and thermosteric sea level change (0–2000 m), 1955–2010, Geophys. Researach Letters 39:L10603.Google Scholar
16. Lotze, Worm (2009) Historical baselines for large marine animals. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:254–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.12.004.Google Scholar
17. Barnosky, et al. (2011) Has the Earth's sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471:51–7. DOI: 10.1038/nature09678.Google Scholar
Emmott, S. (2013) 10 Billion. Penguin UK.
Dorling, D. (2013) Population 10 Billion. Constable.
Weisman, A. (2013) Countdown: Our Last, Best Hope for a Future on Earth? Little Brown and Company.
Malthus, T. (1798) An Essay on the Principle of Population. J. Johnson.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×