The Distributed Nature of Visual Object Learning

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139136907.002

2 - The Distributed Nature of Visual Object Learning

from I - VISUAL AND VISUOMOTOR PLASTICITY

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2013

Hans P. Op de Beeck

Edited by

Jennifer K. E. Steeves and

Laurence R. Harris

Show author details

Hans P. Op de Beeck: Affiliation:
University of Leuven
Jennifer K. E. Steeves: Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Laurence R. Harris: Affiliation:
York University, Toronto

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

We mostly take object vision for granted, simply because our brain makes it seem easy. As a consequence, most of what we learn about objects during both development and adulthood goes unnoticed. Once the input to the system is in order (so excluding retinal disorders), almost all people can recognize cars, Coca-Cola bottles, and Barbie dolls. We only get a glimpse of the complexity of the underlying processes when we go through the most challenging tasks that we are typically confronted with. For example, some people have below average skills in face recognition. In this respect, interindividual differences in the most challenging object recognition tasks, created either naturally or in the lab by manipulating experience, serve as a gold mine for trying to understand the brain's exceptional ability to recognize objects.

My favorite example of an idiosyncratic object recognition talent is Gudrun, my eight-year-old daughter. She has a favorite teddy bear, are affection that developed when she was only a few months old. When Gudrun was one year old, my wife and I bought a second identical bear (just in case the first one was lost). Obviously, she noticed the difference between the old bear (which she calls “pretty bear”) and the new one. It was also easy for us parents to differentiate between the old worn bear and the new exemplar. However, over the years these differences became very minor, and now no one can reliably differentiate “pretty bear” from “new bear.”

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Plasticity in Sensory Systems , pp. 9 - 32

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139136907.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baker, C. I., Behrmann, M. and Olson, C. R. (2002). Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nat. Neurosci., 5: 1210–1216.Google Scholar

Bilalic, M., Langner, R.,Ulrich, R. and Grodd, W. (2011). Many faces of expertise: fusiform face area in chess experts and novices. J. Neurosci., 31: 10206–10214.Google Scholar

Bondar, I. V., Leopold, D. A., Richmond, B. J., Victor, J. D. and Logothetis, N. K. (2009). Long-term stability of visual pattern selective responses of monkey temporal lobe neurons. PLoS ONE, 4: e8222.Google Scholar

Bracci, S., Ietswaart, M., Peelen, M. V. and Cavina-Pratesi, C. (2010). Dissociable neural responses to hands and non-hand body parts in human left extrastriate visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol., 103: 3389–3397.Google Scholar

Brants, M., Wagemans, J. and Op de Beeck, H. P. (2012). Activation of fusiform face area by Greebles is related to face similarity but not expertise. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 34: 3949–3958.Google Scholar

Brincat, S. L. and Connor, C. E. (2004). Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex. Nat. Neurosci., 7: 880–886.Google Scholar

Bukach, C. M., Gauthier, I. and Tarr, M. J. (2006). Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework. Trends Cogn. Sci., 10: 159–166.Google Scholar

Bukach, C. M., Vickery, T. J., Kinka, D. and Gauthier, I. (2012). Training experts: individuation without naming is worth it. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 38(1): 14–7.Google Scholar

Chao, L. L., Haxby, J. V. and Martin, A. (1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nat. Neurosci., 2: 913–919.Google Scholar

Chao, L. L., Martin, A. and Haxby, J. V. (1999). Are face-responsive regions selective only for faces?NeuroReport, 10: 2945–2950.Google Scholar

Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehericy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Henaff, M. A. and Michel, F. (2000). The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123: 291–307.Google Scholar

Cohen, L., Lehericy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S. and Dehaene, S. (2002). Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area. Brain, 125: 1054–1069.Google Scholar

Cox, D. D., Meier, P., Oertelt, N. and DiCarlo, J. J. (2005). “Breaking” position-invariant object recognition. Nat. Neurosci., 8: 1145–1147.Google Scholar

De Baene, W., Ons, B., Wagemans, J. and Vogels, R. (2008). Effects of category learning on the stimulus selectivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. Learn. Mem., 15: 717–727.Google Scholar

De Baene, W. and Vogels, R. (2010). Effects of adaptation on the stimulus selectivity of macaque inferior temporal spiking activity and local field potentials. Cereb. Cortex, 20: 2145–2165.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S. and Cohen, L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 56: 384–398.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., Braga, L. W., Ventura, P., Nunes Filho, G., Jobert, A., Dohaene-Lambentz, G., Kohinky, R., Morais, J. and Cohen, L. (2010). How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science, 330: 1359–1364.Google Scholar

Desimone, R., Albright, T. D., Gross, C. G. and Bruce, C. (1984). Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque. J. Neurosci., 4: 2051–2062.Google Scholar

Diamond, R. and Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 115: 107–117.Google Scholar

DiCarlo, J. J. and Cox, D. D. (2007). Untangling invariant object recognition. Trends Cogn. Sci., 11: 333–341.Google Scholar

Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M. and Kanwisher, N. (2001). A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science, 293: 2470–2473.Google Scholar

Gauthier, I. (2000). What constrains the organization of the ventral temporal cortex?Trends Cogn. Sci., 4: 1–2.Google Scholar

Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C. and Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nat. Neurosci., 3: 191–197.Google Scholar

Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Anderson, A. W., Skudlarski, P. and Gore, J. C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform “face area” increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nat. Neurosci., 2: 568–573.Google Scholar

Gross, C. G., Rocha-Miranda, C. E. and Bender, D. B. (1972). Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the macaque. J. Neurophysiol., 35: 96–111.Google Scholar

Harel, A., Gilaie-Dotan, S., Malach, R. and Bentin, S. (2010). Top-down engagement modulates the neural expressions of visual expertise. Cereb. Cortex, 20: 2304–2318.Google Scholar

Harley, E. M., Pope, W. B., Villablanca, J. P., Mumford, J., Suh, R., Mazziotta, J. C., Engmann, D. and Engel, S. A. (2009). Engagement of fusiform cortex and disengagement of lateral occipital cortex in the acquisition of radiological expertise. Cereb. Cortex, 19: 2746–2754.Google Scholar

Hasson, U., Levy, I., Behrmann, M., Hendler, T. and Malach, R. (2002). Eccentricity bias as an organizing principle for human high-order object areas. Neuron, 34: 479–490.Google Scholar

Haushofer, J., Livingstone, M. S. and Kanwisher, N. (2008). Multivariate patterns in objectselective cortex dissociate perceptual and physical shape similarity. PLoS Biol., 6: e187.Google Scholar

Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., and Pietrini, P. (2001). Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventrotemporal cortox. Science, 293(5539): 2425–2430.Google Scholar

Hoffman, K. L. and Logothetis, N. K. (2009). Cortical mechanisms of sensory learning and object recognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci., 364: 321–329.Google Scholar

Hung, C. P., Kreiman, G., Poggio, T. and DiCarlo, J. J. (2005). Fast readout of object identity from macaque inferior temporal cortex. Science, 310: 863–866.Google Scholar

Ito, M., Tamura, H., Fujita, I. and Tanaka, K. (1995). Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. J. Neurophysiol., 73: 218–226.Google Scholar

Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J. and Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci., 17: 4302–4311.Google Scholar

Kanwisher, N., Woods, R. P., Iacoboni, M. and Mazziotta, J. C. (1997). A locus in human extrastriate cortex for visual shape analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 9: 133–142.Google Scholar

Kanwisher, N. and Yovel, G. (2006). The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci., 361: 2109–2128.Google Scholar

Kobatake, E., Wang, G. and Tanaka, K. (1998). Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. J. Neurophysiol., 80: 324–330.Google Scholar

Krawczyk, D. C., Boggan, A. L., McClelland, M. M. and Bartlett, J. C. (2011). The neural organization of perception in chess experts. Neurosci. Lett., 499: 64–69.Google Scholar

Li, N. and DiCarlo, J. J. (2008). Unsupervised natural experience rapidly alters invariant object representation in visual cortex. Science, 321: 1502–1507.Google Scholar

Li, N. and DiCarlo, J. J. (2010). Unsupervised natural visual experience rapidly reshapes size-invariant object representation in inferior temporal cortex. Neuron, 67: 1062–1075.Google Scholar

Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J. and Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Curr. Biol., 5: 552–563.Google Scholar

Logothetis, N. K. and Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). Visual object recognition. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 19: 577–621.Google Scholar

Mahon, B. Z., Milleville, S. C., Negri, G. A., Rumiati, R. I., Caramazza, A. and Martin, A. (2007). Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron, 55: 507–520.Google Scholar

Malach, R., Reppas, J. B., Benson, R. R., Kwong, K. K., Jiang, H., Kennedy, W. A., Ledden, P. J., Brady, T. J., Rosen, B. R. and Tootell, R. B. (1995). Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 92: 8135–8139.Google Scholar

Mante, V. and Carandini, M. (2005). Mapping of stimulus energy in primary visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol., 94: 788–798.Google Scholar

Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G. and Haxby, J. V. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature, 379: 649–652.Google Scholar

Mckone, E. and Robbins, R. (2011). Are faces special? In A. J., Calder, G., Rhodes, J. V., Haxby and M. H., Johnson (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception, pp. 149–176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef

Miyashita, Y. (1988). Neuronal correlate of visual associative long-term memory in the primate temporal cortex. Nature, 335: 817–820.Google Scholar

Miyashita, Y. (1993). Inferior temporal cortex: where visual perception meets memory. Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 16: 245–263.Google Scholar

Miyashita, Y., Date, A. and Okuno, H. (1993). Configurational encoding of complex visual forms by single neurons of monkey temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 31: 1119–1131.Google Scholar

Miyashita, Y., Kameyama, M., Hasegawa, I. and Fukushima, T. (1998). Consolidation of visual associative long-term memory in the temporal cortex of primates. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 70: 197–211.Google Scholar

Miyashita, Y., Okuno, H., Tokuyama, W., Ihara, T. and Nakajima, K. (1996). Feedback signal from medial temporal lobe mediates visual associative mnemonic codes of inferotemporal neurons. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res., 5: 81–86.Google Scholar

Op de Beeck, H. P. and Baker, C. I. (2010). Informativeness and learning: response to Gauthier and colleagues. Trends Cogn. Sci., 14: 236–237.Google Scholar

Op de Beeck, H. P., Baker, C. I., DiCarlo, J. J. and Kanwisher, N. (2006). Discrimination training alters object representations in human extrastriate cortex. J. Neuorsci., 26: 13025–13036.Google Scholar

Op de Beeck, H. P., Brants, M., Baeck, A. and Wagemans, J. (2010). Distributed subordinate specificity for bodies, faces, and buildings in human ventral visual cortex. Neuroimage, 49: 3414–3425.Google Scholar

Op de Beeck, H. P., Haushofer, J. and Kanwisher, N. G. (2008). Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 9: 123–135.Google Scholar

Op de Beeck, H. P., Torfs, K. and Wagemans, J. (2008). Perceived shape similarity among unfamiliar objects and the organization of the human object vision pathway. J. Neurosci., 28: 10111–10123.Google Scholar

Op de Beeck, H. P.,Wagemans, J. and Vogels, R. (2001). Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes. Nat. Neurosci., 4: 1244–1252.Google Scholar

Panis, S.,Vangeneugden, J., Op de Beeck, H. P. and Wagemans, J. (2008). The representation of subordinate shape similarity in human occipitotemporal cortex. J. Vis., 8: 1–15.Google Scholar

Parga, N. and Rolls, E. (1998). Transform-invariant recognition by association in a recurrent network. Neural Comput., 10: 1507–1525.Google Scholar

Peelen, M. V. and Downing, P. E. (2007). The neural basis of visual body perception. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 8: 636–648.Google Scholar

Quiroga, R. Q., Reddy, L., Kreiman, G., Koch, C. and Fried, I. (2005). Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature, 435: 1102–1107.Google Scholar

Raiguel, S., Vogels, R., Mysore, S. G. and Orban, G. A. (2006). Learning to see the difference specifically alters the most informative V4 neurons. J. Neurosci., 26: 6589–6602.Google Scholar

Rhodes, G., Byatt, G., Michie, P. T. and Puce, A. (2004). Is the fusiform face area specialized for faces, individuation, or expert individuation?J. Cogn. Neurosci., 16: 189–203.Google Scholar

Riesenhuber, M. and Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nat. Neurosci., 2: 1019–1025.Google Scholar

Roelfsema, P. R. and van Ooyen, A. (2005). Attention-gated reinforcement learning of internal representations for classification. Neural Comput., 17: 2176–2214.Google Scholar

Sary, G., Vogels, R. and Orban, G. A. (1993). Cue-invariant shape selectivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. Science, 260: 995–997.Google Scholar

Schoups, A., Vogels, R., Qian, N. and Orban, G. (2001). Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons. Nature, 412: 549–553.Google Scholar

Sheinberg, D. L. and Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Perceptual learning and the development of complex visual representations in temporal cortical neurons. In M., Fahle and T., Poggio (eds.), Perceptual Learning, pp. 95–124. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sigala, N. and Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex. Nature, 415: 318–320.Google Scholar

Song, Y., Hu, S., Li, X., Li, W. and Liu, J. (2010). The role of top-down task context in learning to perceive objects. J. Neurosci., 30: 9869–9876.Google Scholar

Tanaka, K. (2003). Columns for complex visual object features in the inferotemporal cortex: clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities. Cereb. Cortex, 13: 90–99.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. C. and Downing, P. E. (2011). Division of labor between lateral and ventral extrastriate tepresentations of faces, bodies and objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci., 23: 4122–4137.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. C., Wiggett, A. J. and Downing, P. E. (2007). Functional MRI analysis of body and body part representations in the extrastriate and fusiform body areas. J. Neurophysiol., 98: 1626–1633.Google Scholar

Tovee, M. J., Rolls, E. T. and Ramachandran, V. S. (1996). Rapid visual learning in neurones of the primate temporal visual cortex. NeuroReport, 7: 2757–2760.Google Scholar

Vogels, R. (2010). Mechanisms of visual perceptual learning in macaque visual cortex. Top. Cogn. Sci., 2: 239–250.Google Scholar

Wagemans, J., Wichmann, F. A. and Op de Beeck, H. (2004). Visual perception I: basic principles. In K., Lamberts and R., Goldstone (eds.), Handbook of Cognition, pp. 3–47. London: Sage.

Wallis, G. and Rolls, E. T. (1997). Invariant face and object recognition in the visual system. Prog. Neurobiol., 51: 167–194.Google Scholar

Wilmer, J. B., Germine, L., Chabris, C. F., Chatterjee, G., Williams, M., Loken, E., Nakayama, K. and Duchaine, B. (2010). Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 107: 5238–5241.Google Scholar

Wong, A. C., Palmeri, T. J. and Gauthier, I. (2009). Conditions for facelike expertise with objects: becoming a Ziggerin expert – but which type?Psychol. Sci., 20: 1108–1117.Google Scholar

Wong, A. C., Palmeri, T. J., Rogers, B. P., Gore, J. C. and Gauthier, I. (2009). Beyond shape: how you learn about objects affects how they are represented in visual cortex. PLoS ONE, 4: e8405.Google Scholar

Xu, Y. (2005). Revisiting the role of the fusiform face area in visual expertise. Cereb. Cortex, 15: 1234–1242.Google Scholar

Yamane, Y., Carlson, E. T., Bowman, K. C., Wang, Z. and Connor, C. E. (2008). A neural code for three-dimensional object shape in macaque inferotemporal cortex. Nat. Neurosci., 11: 1352–1360.Google Scholar

Zhu, Q., Song, Y., Hu, S., Li, X., Tian, M., Zhen, Z., Dong, Q., Kanwisher, N. and Liu, J. (2010). Heritability of the specific cognitive ability of face perception. Curr. Biol., 20: 137–142.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.