Bibliography

doi:10.1017/CBO9781316423547.013

Whittaker, J. and Louis, J. (eds.) (2002) Alcinoos: Enseignement des doctrines de Platons, with transl. and notes. Paris.Google Scholar

Fazzo, S. and Zonta, M. (eds.) (1999) Alessandro di Afrodisia: La provvidenza. Questioni sulla provvidenza, with transl. and notes. Milan.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (ed.) (2008) Alexander of Aphrodisias: De Anima libri mantissa, with transl. and comm. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Thillet, P. (ed.) (2003) Alexandre d'Aphrodise: Traité de la providence, with transl. and notes. Paris.Google Scholar

Wendland, P. (ed.) (1901) Alexander Aphrodisiensis: In librum De sensu commentarium (CAG III.1). Berlin.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. and Rowe, C. (eds.) (2002) Nicomachean Ethics, with transl. and comm. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hope, R. (1961) Aristotle's Physics: With an Analytical Index of Technical Terms. Lincoln.Google Scholar

Bader, R. (ed.) (1940) Der Alethes Logos des Kelsos. Stuttgart and Berlin.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, R. J. (ed.) (1987) Celsus: On the True Doctrine. A Discourse against the Christians, transl. with an intr. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Lanata, G. (ed.) (1994) Celso: Il discorso vero, with transl. and notes, 2nd edn. Milan.Google Scholar

Lona, H. E. (ed.) (2005) Kelsos: Die wahre Lehre, with transl. and notes. Freiburg, Basle and Vienna.Google Scholar

Rizzo, S. (ed.) (1994) Celso: Contro i cristiani, with transl. and notes, 2nd edn. Milan.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (ed.) (2013) Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (ed.) (2002) Diogene Laerzio: Vite dei filosofi, with transl. and comm. (2 vols.), 5th edn. Rome and Bari.Google Scholar

Hicks, R. D. (1925) Diogenes Laertius, The Lives of Eminent Philosophers (2 vols.). Cambridge, Mass. and London.Google Scholar

Nürnberger, C. (ed.) (1791) Diogenis Laertii de vitis dogmatibus et apophthegmatibus liber decimus graece et latine. Nuremberg.Google Scholar

Reale, G. (ed.) (2005) Diogene Laerzio: Vite e dottrine dei più celebri filosofi, with the collaboration of Girgenti, G and Ramelli, I. Milan.Google Scholar

Yonge, C. D. (1895) Diogenes Laertius – Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers. London.Google Scholar

Capasso, M. (ed.) (1982) Trattato etico epicureo (PHerc. 346), with transl. and comm. Naples.Google Scholar

Monet, A. (ed.) (1996) ‘[Philodème, Sur les sensations] PHerc. 19/698’, CErc 26: 27–126.Google Scholar

Puglia, E. (ed.) (1988) Aporie testuali ed esegetiche in Epicuro (PHerc. 1012). Demetrio Lacone, with transl. and comm. Naples.Google Scholar

Romeo, C. (1979) ‘Demetrio Lacone sulla grandezza del sole [PHerc. 1013]’, CErc 9: 11–35Google Scholar

Smith, M. F. (ed.) (1993) Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription, with transl. and notes. Naples.Google Scholar

Angeli, A. (2013) ‘Lettere di Epicuro dall'Egitto (POxy. LXXVI 5077)’, SEP 10: 9–31.Google Scholar

Arrighetti, G. (ed.) (1961, 1973) Epicuro: Opere, with transl. and notes, 2nd edn. Turin.Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (ed.) (1926) Epicurus: The Extant Remains, with transl. and notes. Oxford.Google Scholar

Balaudé, J.-F. (1994) Epicure – Lettres, Maximes, Sentences, with transl. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar

Bollack, J. (ed.) (1975) La Pensée du plaisir. Epicure: Textes moraux, commentaire. Paris.Google Scholar

Conche, M. (1987) Epicure – Lettres et Maximes. Paris.Google Scholar

Delattre, D. et al. (2010) Les Epicuriens. Paris.Google Scholar

Geer, R. M. (1964) Epicurus: Letters, Principle Doctrines, and Vatican Sayings, with transl. New York.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. and Gerson, L. P. (eds. and transl.) (1994) The Epicurus Reader – Selected Writings and Testimonia. Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. (ed.) (1974) Epicuro: Opere, with transl. and notes. Turin.Google Scholar

Leone, G. (ed.) (2012) Epicuro: Sulla natura. Libro II, with transl. and comm. Naples.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. (1992) ‘Epicurus 11 (?)’, in CPF I 1** 51. Florence: 167–91.Google Scholar

Obbink, D. and Schorn, S. (eds.) (2011) ‘Epicurus (et alii): Epistulae ad familiares’, in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri vol. LXXVI 5077. London: 37–50.Google Scholar

Schneider, J. G. (ed.) (1813) Epicuri Physica et Meteorologica. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. (ed.) (1973) ‘Epicurus: On Nature Book XXVIII’, with transl., CErc 3: 5–83.Google Scholar

Usener, H. (ed.) (1887) Epicurea. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Usener, H. (1977) Glossarium Epicureum. Rome.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (ed.) (2010) Epicuro: Epistola a Erodoto, with transl. and comm. Rome.Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V. (ed. and transl.) (2007) Galien: Introduction générale; Sur l'ordre de ses propres livres; Sur ses propres livres; Que l'excellent médecin est aussi philosophe. Paris.Google Scholar

Kollesch, J. (ed.) (1964) Galen: De instrumento odoratus. Berlin.Google Scholar

Simonetti, M. (ed.) (1993) Testi gnostici in lingua greca e latina, with transl. and comm. Milan.Google Scholar

Thomassen, E. (ed.) (1982) The Tripartite Tractate from Nag Hammadi: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. St Andrews.Google Scholar

Thomassen, E. and Pinchaud, L. (eds.) (1989) Le Traité tripartite NH I 5, with transl. and comm. Laval.Google Scholar

Magris, A. (ed.) (2012) ‘Ippolito’: Confutazione di tutte le eresie, with transl. and notes, with an introductory essay of Castelli, E.. Brescia.Google Scholar

Siouville, A. (1988) Hippolyte de Rome: Philosophumena, ou réfutation de toutes les hérésies. Milan.Google Scholar

Bellini, E. and Maschio, G. (eds.) (1997) Ireneo: Contro le eresie e gli altri scritti, with transl. and notes. Milan.Google Scholar

Rousseau, A. and Doutreleau, L. (eds.) (1979) Irénée de Lyon: Contre les hérésies, with transl. (SC 263–4). Paris.Google Scholar

Chadwick, H. (ed.) (1980) Origen: Contra Celsum, with transl. and notes. Cambridge. (1st edn 1953.)Google Scholar

Colonna, A. (ed.) (1971) Origene: Contro Celso. Turin.Google Scholar

Ressa, P. (ed.) (2000) Origene: Contro Celso, with pref. by Moreschini, C. Brescia.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (ed.) (2001) Philo of Alexandria: On the Creation of the Cosmos according to Moses, with transl. and comm. Leyden.Google Scholar

Des Places, E. (ed.) (1977) Atticus: Fragments, with transl. and notes. Paris.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. and Baldi, L. (eds.) (2011) Plutarco: La generazione dell'anima nel Timeo, with transl. and comm. Naples.Google Scholar

Mayhew, R. (ed.) (2008) Plato Laws 10, with intr., transl. and comm. Oxford.Google Scholar

Tarán, L. (ed.) (1981) Speusippus of Athens: A Critical Study with a Collection of the Related Texts and Commentary. Leyden.CrossRef Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. (ed.) (1958) Plotinus: Enneads, with transl. and notes, vol. III. Cambridge, Mass. and London.Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. (1969 (1st edn. 1966), 1984) Plotinus: Enneads, with transl. and notes, vols. I, V. Cambridge, Mass. and London.Google Scholar

Baracat, J. C. (ed.) (2006) Enéadas. Campinas.Google Scholar

Bréhier, E. (ed.) (1924–5) Plotin: Ennéades, with transl. and notes, vols. II–III. Paris.Google Scholar

Bréhier, E. (1927) Plotin: Ennéades, with transl. and notes, vol. IV. Paris.Google Scholar

Bréhier, E. (1931, repr. 1967) Plotin: Ennéades, with transl. and notes, vol. V. Paris.Google Scholar

Casaglia, M., Guidelli, C., Linguiti, A. and Moriani, A. (1997) Plotino: Enneadi, with transl. and notes (2 vols.). Turin.Google Scholar

Chappuis, M. (ed.) (2006) Plotin: Traité 3 (III, 1), with transl. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar

Cornea, A. (ed.) (2003–9) Plotin: Opere, 3 vols. Bucharest.Google Scholar

D'Ancona, C. et al. (eds.) (2003) Plotino: La discesa dell'anima nei corpi – Plotiniana Arabica, with transl. and comm. Padua.Google Scholar

Dufour, R. (ed.) (2003) Plotin: Traité 12 (II, 4). Sur les deux matières, with transl. and notes, in Plotin: Traités 7–21, ed. Brisson, L. and Pradeau, J.-F.. Paris.Google Scholar

Dufour, R. (2006) Plotin: Traité 33 (II, 9), with transl. and notes, in Plotin: Traités 30–37, ed. Brisson, L. and Pradeau, J.-F.. Paris.Google Scholar

Dufour, R. (2009) Plotin: Traités 47–48 (III, 2–3), with transl. and notes, in Plotin: Traités 45–50, ed. Brisson, L. and Pradeau, J.-F.. Paris.Google Scholar

Faggin, G. (ed.) (1992) Plotino: Enneadi. Milan.Google Scholar

Fronterotta, F. (ed.) (2002) Plotin: Traité 5 (V, 9). Sur l'Intellect, les idées et ce qui est, with transl. and notes, in Plotin: Traités 1–6, ed. Brisson, L. and Pradeau, J.-F.. Paris.Google Scholar

Guidelli, C. (1997) see Casaglia et al.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (ed.) (1994) Plotin: Traité 9 (VI, 9), with transl. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (1999) Plotin: Traité 38 (VI, 7), with transl. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar

Harder von, R. (ed.) (1956–60) Plotins Schriften, 1, 5, with transl. and notes. Hamburg.Google Scholar

Henry, P. and Schwyzer, H.-R. (eds.) (1964–82) Plotini Opera (3 vols.). Oxford (editio minor).Google Scholar

Igal, J. (ed.) (1998) Plotino: Enéades, with transl. and notes, vol. III. Madrid.Google Scholar

Linguiti, A. (ed.) (2000) Plotino: La felicità e il tempo. Enneadi I 4 – I 5, with transl. and notes. Milan.Google Scholar

Linguiti, A. (2007) Plotin: Traité 36 (I, 5), with transl. and comm., French edn. by Peduzzi, A. C.. Paris.Google Scholar

Longo, A. (ed.) (2009) Plotin: Traité 2 (IV, 7), with transl. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar

MacKenna, S. and Dillon, J. (1991) Plotinus: The Enneads. London.Google Scholar

MacKenna, S. and Page, B. S. (1917) Plotinus: The Enneads, vol. I. London.Google Scholar

McGroarty, K. (ed.) (2006) Plotinus on Eudaimonia: A Commentary on Ennead I 4, with transl. Oxford.CrossRef Google Scholar

Meijer, P. A. (ed.) (1992) Plotinus on the Good or the One (Enneads VI, 9): An Analytical Commentary. Amsterdam.CrossRef Google Scholar

Morel, P.-M. (ed.) (2007) Plotin: Traité 41 (IV, 6). Sur la sensation et la mémoire, with transl. and notes, in Plotin: Traités 38–41, ed. Brisson, L. and Pradeau, J.-F.. Paris.Google Scholar

Narbonne, J.-M. (ed.) (1993) Plotin: Les Deux Matières [Ennéade II, 4 (12)], with transl. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar

Ninci, M. (2000) Plotino: Il pensiero come diverso dall'uno. Quinta Enneade, with transl. and notes. Milan.Google Scholar

Perdikouri, E. (ed.) (2014) Plotin: Traité 12 (II, 4), with transl. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar

Petit, A. (ed.) (2002) Plotin: Traité 3 (III, 1). Sur le destin, with transl. and notes, in Plotin: Traités 1–6, ed. Brisson, L. and Pradeau, J.-F.. Paris.Google Scholar

Radice, R. (2003) Plotino: Enneadi. Milan.Google Scholar

Schniewind, A. (ed.) (2007) Plotin: Traité 5 (V, 9), with transl. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar

Soares Santoprete, L. G. E. (ed.) (2009) Plotin: Traité 32 (V, 5). Sur l'Intellect, que les intelligibles ne sont pas hors de l'Intellect et sur le Bien, with transl. and comm. Thèse de doctorat EPHE. Paris.Google Scholar

Spanu, N. (ed.) (2012) Plotinus: Ennead II 9 [33] Against the Gnostics, with transl. and comm. Leuven.Google Scholar

Taormina, D. P. (ed.) (in press) Plotin: Traité 41 (IV 6), with transl. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar

Tornau, Ch. (ed.) (2001) Plotin: Ausgewählte Schriften, with transl. and notes. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Vorwerk, M. (ed.) (2001) Plotins Schrift ‘Über den Geist, die Ideen und das Seiende’. Ennead V 9 [5], with transl. and comm. Munich and Leipzig.CrossRef Google Scholar

VV, AA.. (ed.) (1959–78) Plutarchi Moralia. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Alekniené, T. (2012) ‘Plotin contre les Gnostiques (tr. 33, Enn. II 9): Défense de l'ancienne philosophie grecque’, in Ecrire contre: Quête d'identité, quête de pouvoir dans la littérature des premiers siècles chrétiens, ed. Vinel, F.. Strasburg: 71–91.Google Scholar

Algra, K. A. (1994) ‘Gassendi et le texte de Diogène Laërce’, Elenchos 15: 79–103.Google Scholar

Althoff, J. (1999) ‘Zur Epikurrezeption bei Laktanz’, in Zur Rezeption der hellenistischen Philosophie in der Spätantike, ed. Fuhrer, Th. and Erler, M.. Stuttgart: 33–53.Google Scholar

Angeli, A. ‘Lettere di Epicuro dall'Egitto (POxy. 5077)’, SEP 10: 9–31.Google Scholar

Angeli, A. (in press) ‘Timocratès’, in DphA, vol. VI. Paris.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1992) Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Annas, J. (1993) The Morality of Happiness. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. (1938) ‘The Gods in Plato, Plotinus, Epicurus’, CQ 32: 190–6.CrossRef Google Scholar

Arrighetti, (1961, 1973) see EpicurusGoogle Scholar

Asmis, E. (1984) Epicurus' Scientific Method. Ithaca N.Y.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (2008) ‘Epicurean Epistemology’, in The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, ed. Algra, K. A. et al. Cambridge: 259–94.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (2009) ‘Epicurean Empiricism’, in The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed. Warren, J.. Cambridge: 84–104.CrossRef Google Scholar

Avotins, I. (1980) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on Vision in the Atomists’, CQ 30: 429–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Babut, D. (1969) Plutarque et le Stoïcisme. Paris.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1986) ‘Diogene Laerzio e il pirronismo’, Elenchos 7: 385–426.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1989) ‘The Size of the Sun in Antiquity’, ACD 25: 29–41.Google Scholar

Beierwaltes, W. (1961) ‘Die Metaphysik des Lichtes in der Philosophie Plotins’, ZPhF 15: 334–62.Google Scholar

Bergjan, S.-P. (2001) ‘Celsus the Epicurean? The Interpretation of an Argument in Origen, Contra Celsum’, HThR 94: 179–204.Google Scholar

Berti, E. (1994) ‘Il dibattito sul piacere nell'Accademia antica’, in I filosofi greci e il piacere, ed. Montoneri, L.. Rome and Bari: 135–58.Google Scholar

Bignone, E. (1936) L'Aristotele perduto e la formazione filosofica di Epicuro. Florence.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, H. (1989) ‘Plotinus and Proclus on the Criterion of Truth’, in The Criterion of Truth: Essays in Honour of George Kerferd, ed. Huby, P. and Neal, G.. Liverpool: 257–80, reprinted in Blumenthal 1993: ch. 9.Google Scholar

Blumenthal, H. (1993) Soul and Intellect: Studies in Plotinus and Later Neoplatonism. Aldershot.Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. (1998) Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2005) ‘Plotino, il Teeteto, gli Stoici: Alcune osservazioni intorno alla percezione e alla conoscenza’, in Studi sull'anima in Plotino, ed. Chiaradonna, R.. Naples: 203–22.Google Scholar

Bonazzi, M. (2015) A la Recherche des idées: Platonisme et philosophie hellénistique d'Antiochus à Plotin. Paris.Google Scholar

Boulogne, J. (2003) Plutarque dans le miroir d'Epicure: Analyse d'une critique systématique de l’épicuréisme. Villeneuve d'Ascq.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. (1997) ‘Epicure’, in Philosophie grecque, ed. Canto-Sperber, M.. Paris: 475–510.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1972) Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge, Mass. [orig. 1962].Google Scholar

Cataudella, Q. (1943) ‘Celso e l'epicureismo’, ASNP 12: 1–23.Google Scholar

Cavallo, G. (1984) ‘I rotoli di Ercolano come prodotti scritti: Quattro riflessioni’, S&C 8: 5–30.Google Scholar

Charrue, J.-M. (1978) Plotin lecteur de Platon. Paris.Google Scholar

Charrue, J.-M. (2006) ‘Plotin et Epicure’, Emerita 74: 289–320, reprinted in Charrue 2010: 207–35.CrossRef Google Scholar

Charrue, J.-M. (2010) De L’être et du monde: Ammonius, Plotin, Proclus. Paris.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2009) Plotino. Rome.Google Scholar

Chiaradonna, R. (2012) ‘Plotino su pensiero, estensione e percezione sensibile: Un dualismo cartesiano?’, in Il platonismo e le scienze, ed. Chiaradonna, R.. Rome: 81–99.Google Scholar

Cornea, A. (2003) see PlotinusGoogle Scholar

Cornea, A. (2013) ‘Plotinus, Epicurus, and the Gnostics: On Plotinian Classification of Philosophies’, in Gnosticism, Platonism, and the Late Ancient World: Essays in Honour of John Turner. Leyden and Boston: 465–84.Google Scholar

Corrigan, K. (1996) Plotinus' Theory of Matter-Evil and the Question of Substance: Plato, Aristotle and Alexander of Aphrodisias. Leuven.Google Scholar

Corti, A. (2014) L'Adversus Colotem di Plutarco: Storia di una polemica filosofica. Leuven.Google Scholar

Crone, P. (in press) ‘Ungodly Cosmologies’, in The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, ed. Schmidtke, S.. Oxford.Google Scholar

Crouzel, H. (1991) Origène et Plotin: Comparaisons doctrinales. Paris.Google Scholar

D'Ancona, C. (2012) ‘Plotin’, in DPhA, vol. Va: De Paccius à Plotin. Paris: 984–92.Google Scholar

Del Mastro, G. (2014) Titoli e annotazioni bibliologiche nei papiri greci di Ercolano. Naples.Google Scholar

Dhanani, A. (1994) The Physical Theory of Kalām: Atoms, Space, and Void in Basrian Muʻtazilī Cosmology. Leyden.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. (1983) ‘Plotinus, Philo and Origen on the Grades of Virtue’, in Platonismus und Christentum: Festschrift für Heinrich Dörrie, ed. Blume, H.-D. and Mann, F.. Münster, Westphalia: 92–105.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. (1990) ‘The Theory of Three Classes of Men in Plotinus and Philo’, in The Golden Chain: Studies in the Development of Platonism and Christianity. Aldershot: ch. 20.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. M. (2002) ‘Plutarch and God: Theodicy and Cosmogony in the Thought of Plutarch’, in Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath, ed. Frede, D. and Laks, A.. Leyden, Boston and Cologne: 223–37.Google Scholar

Di Pasquale Barbanti, M. (1994) ‘Piacere, bene, felicità in Plotino’, in I filosofi greci e il piacere, ed. Montoneri, L.. Rome and Bari: 180–205.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (1965) Pagans and Christians in an Age of Anxiety. Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1982) Le scuole l'anima l'impero: La filosofia antica da Antioco a Plotino. Turin.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (1996) ‘Theia dynamis in Alessandro di Afrodisia’, in Dunamis nel Neoplatonismo, ed. Cardullo, R. L. and Romano, F.. Florence: 11–29.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (1997) ‘Lucrèce et les Epicuriens de Campanie’, in Lucretius and His Intellectual Background, ed. Algra, K. A., Könen, M. H. and Schrijvers, P. H.. Amsterdam: 35–48.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (2000) ‘Plotina, Adriano e gli Epicurei di Atene’, in Epikureismus in der späten Republik und der Kaiserzeit, ed. Erler, M. and Bees, R.. Stuttgart: 137–48.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (2009) Laertiana: Capitoli sulla tradizione manoscritta e sulla storia del testo delle Vite dei filosofi di Diogene Laerzio. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. (2010) ‘Diogene Laerzio, Epicuro e gli editori di Epicuro e di Diogene Laerzio’, Eikasmós 21: 273–301.Google Scholar

Dorandi, T. and Messeri, G. (2004) ‘Aspetti della tradizione gnomica di Epicuro e degli epicurei’, in Aspetti di letteratura gnomica nel mondo antico, ed. Funghi, M. S.. Florence: II 273–80, 356–9.Google Scholar

Dorival, G. (1998) ‘La Forme littéraire du Contre Celse’, in Discorsi di verità: Paganesimo, giudaismo e cristianesimo a confronto nel Contro Celso di Origene, ed. Perrone, L.. Rome: 29–45.Google Scholar

Dufour, M. (2001) ‘La distinction ἐνέργεια–κίνησις en Métaph. Θ 6: Deux manières d’être dans le temps’, RPhA 29: 3–43.Google Scholar

Dufour, R. (2006) ‘Plotin et les stoïciens’, in Etudes Platoniciennes III, L’âme amphibie, Etudes sur l’âme selon Plotin. Paris: 177–94.Google Scholar

Dumont, J.-P. (1981) ‘Plotin et la doxographie épicurienne’, in Néoplatonisme: Mélanges offerts à J. Trouillard. Fontenay-aux-Roses: 191–204.Google Scholar

Eliade, M. (ed.) (1994) Enciclopedia delle religioni. Milan.Google Scholar

Eliasson, E. (2008) The Notion of That Which Depends on Us in Plotinus and Its Background. Leyden and Boston.CrossRef Google Scholar

Eliasson, E. (2009) ‘Sur la conception plotinienne du destin dans le traité 3’, EPh 90: 407–30.Google Scholar

Eliasson, E. (2010) ‘Aspects of Plotinus' Account of What is ἐφ’ἡμῖν’, in Wille und Handlung in der Philosophie der Kaiserzeit und Spätantike, ed. Müller, J. and Hofmeister Pich, R.. Berlin and New York: 177–94.Google Scholar

Emilsson, E. K. (1988) Plotinus on Sense-Perception: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Emilsson, E. K. (1996) ‘Cognition and Its Object’, in The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus, ed. Gerson, L. P.. Cambridge: 217–49.Google Scholar

Emilsson, E. K. (2007) Plotinus on Intellect. Oxford.CrossRef Google Scholar

Emilsson, E. K. (2008) ‘Plotinus on Sense Perception’, in Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Knuuttila, S. and Kärkkäinen, P.. Dordrecht: 22–33.Google Scholar

Emilsson, E. K. (2010) ‘L'idealismo plotiniano’, in L'essere del pensiero: Saggi sulla filosofia di Plotino, ed. Taormina, D. P. with the collaboration of O'Meara, D. J. and Riedweg, Ch.. Naples: 65–93.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (2002) ‘Epicurus and deus mortalis: Homoiosis theo and Epicurean Self-Cultivation’, in Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic theology, Its Background and Aftermath. Leyden, Boston and Cologne: 159–81.Google Scholar

Erler, M. (2009) ‘Epicureanism in the Roman Empire’, in The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed. Warren, J.. Cambridge: 46–64.CrossRef Google Scholar

Erler, M. and Bees, R. (eds.) (2000) Epikureismus in der späten Republik und der Kaiserzeit. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Fazzo, S. (1999) see Alexander of AphrodisiasGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, J. (1990) (revised and supplemented post mortem by Hershbell, J.) ‘Epicureanism under the Roman Empire’, in ANRW, ed. Haase, W., II vol. 36.4. Berlin and New York: 2257–327.Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2010–11) ‘La psichicità dell'anima del mondo e il divenire precosmico secondo Plutarco’, Ploutarchos 9: 15–36.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. (2012) ‘L'esegesi medioplatonica del Timeo: Metodi, finalità, risultati’, in Il Timeo: Esegesi greche, arabe, latine, ed. Celia, F. and Ulacco, A.. Pisa: 81–131.Google Scholar

Ferwerda, R. (1965) La Signification des images et des métaphores dans la pensée de Plotin. Groningen.Google Scholar

Festugière, A.-J. (1971) ‘Les Trois Vies’, in Etudes de philosophie grecque. Paris: 117–56.Google Scholar

Festugière, A.-J. (1997) Epicure et ses dieux. Paris. (1st edn 1946.)Google Scholar

Filoramo, G. (1983) L'attesa della fine: Storia della gnosi. Bari.Google Scholar

Flemming, R. (2012) ‘Antiochus and Asclepiades: Medical and Philosophical Sectarianism at the End of the Hellenistic Era’, in The Philosophy of Antiochus, ed. Sedley, D.. Cambridge: 55–79.CrossRef Google Scholar

Follet, S. (1994) ‘Lettres d'Hadrien aux Epicuriens d'Athènes (14.2–14.3.125)’: SEG III 226 + IG II² 1097, 1, REG 107: 158–71.Google Scholar

Follet, S. (2007) ‘Bull. épigr. 2007’, nr. 231, REG 120: 648.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (1994) ‘Celsus philosophus Platonicus’, in ANRW, ed. Haase, W., II vol. 36.7. Berlin and New York: 5183–213.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (2011) A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought, ed. Long, A. A., with a foreword by Sedley, D. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar

Gatier, P. L. (1997) ‘Bull. épigr. 1997’, nr. 639, REG 110: 589–602.Google Scholar

Geer, R. M. (1964) see EpicurusGoogle Scholar

Gercke, A. (1899) De quibusdam Laertii Diogenis auctoribus. Greifswald.Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. (2003) ‘Plotinus and Epicurean Epistemology’, in Epicurus: His Continuing Influence and Contemporary Relevance, ed. Gordon, D. R. and Suits, D. B.. Rochester, N.Y.: 69–80.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1986) ‘Biografia e dossografia in Diogene Laerzio’, Elenchos 7: 7–102.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. (1994) ‘Diogene Laerzio’, in Lo spazio letterario della Grecia antica, ed. Cambiano, G., Canfora, L. and Lanza, D., vol. I.3. Rome: 723–40.Google Scholar

Glei, R. F. (1988) ‘Et invidus et inbecillus: Das angebliche Epikurfragment bei Laktanz, De ira dei 13, 20–21’, VChr 42: 47–58.Google Scholar

Glucker, J. (1978) Antiochus and the Late Academy. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Gordon, P. (2013) ‘Epistolary Epicureans’, in Epistolary Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature, ed. Hodkinson, O, Rosenmeyer, P. A. and Bracke, E.. Leyden: 133–51.Google Scholar

Goulet, R. (1982) ‘Le système chronologique de la Vie de Plotin’, in Porphyre: La Vie de Plotin, ed. Brisson, L. et al., vol. I. Paris: 187–227.Google Scholar

Graeser, A. (1972) Plotinus and the Stoics: A Preliminary Study. Leyden.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (1986) ‘Le Présent seul est notre Bonheur: La valeur de l'instant présent chez Goethe et dans la philosophie antique’, Diogène 133: 58–81.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. (2008) N'oublie pas de vivre: Goethe et la tradition des exercices spirituels. Paris.Google Scholar

Harder von, R. (1956) see PlotinusGoogle Scholar

Hatzimichali, M. (2012) ‘Antiochus’ Biography’, in The Philosophy of Antiochus, ed. Sedley, D.. Cambridge: 9–30.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. P. (1992) ‘Plutarch and Epicureanism’, in ANRW, ed. Haase, W., II vol. 36.5. Berlin and New York: 3353–83.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Ph. (2005) ‘La définition stoïcienne du temps dans le miroir du néoplatonisme: (Plotin, Jamblique)’, in Les Stoïciens, ed. Dherbey, G. Romeyer and Gourinat, J.-B.. Paris: 487–521.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Ph. (2012) ‘Un Grief antichrétien chez Proclus: L'ignorance en théologie’, in Les Chrétiens et l'Hellénisme: Identités religieuses et culture grecque dans l'Antiquité tardive, ed. Perrot, A.. Paris: 161–97.Google Scholar

Hope, R. (1961) see AristotleGoogle Scholar

Joly, R. (1956) Le Thème philosophique des genres de vie dans l'Antiquité Classique. Bruxelles.Google Scholar

Jonas, H. (1934–54) Gnosis und spätantiker Geist (2 vols.). Göttingen (Ital. transl. Jonas, H. (2010) Gnosi e spirito tardo-antico. Milan).Google Scholar

Jonas, H. (2001) The Gnostic Religion: The Message of the Alien God and the Beginnings of Christianity, 3rd edn. Beacon (orig. 1958).Google Scholar

Jones, H. (1999) La tradizione epicurea: Atomismo e materialismo dall'Antichità all'Età Moderna, transl. Crapiz, S.. Genoa (orig. 1992).Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. (2009) ‘Médecine et philosophie: Sur la date de Sextus Empiricus et de Diogène Laërce à la lumière du Corpus galénique’, REG 122: 359–90.Google Scholar

Kalligas, P. (2011) ‘The Structure of Appearances: Plotinus on the Constitution of Sensible Objects’, PhilosQ 61: 762–82.Google Scholar

Kany-Turpin, J. (2000) ‘Lactance, un critique mésestimé de l’épicureisme’, in Epikureismus in der späten Republik und der Kaiserzeit, ed. Erler, M. and Bees, R.. Stuttgart: 218–30.Google Scholar

Kechagia, E. (2012) Plutarch against Colotes: A Lesson in History of Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar

King, K. (2003) What is Gnosticism? Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

King, R. A. H. (2009) Aristotle and Plotinus on Memory. Berlin and New York.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kirbihler, F. (2012) ‘Plotina (Pompeia)’, in DphA, vol. Vb. De Plotina à Rutilius Rufus. Paris: 1071–5.Google Scholar

Kochalsky, A. (1914) Lehre Epikurs. Leipzig and Berlin.Google Scholar

Krämer, H. J. (1971) Platonismus und hellenistische Philosophie. Berlin and New York.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kristeller, O. (1929) Der Begriff der Seele in der Ethik des Plotin. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Kühn, W. (2009) Quel Savoir après le scepticisme? Plotin et ses prédécesseurs sur la connaissance de soi. Paris.Google Scholar

Larrimore, M. J. (2001) The Problem of Evil. Oxford.Google Scholar

Laurent, J. (1999a) ‘Plotin et le plaisir de vivre’, in L'Homme et le monde selon Plotin. Paris: 103–13.CrossRef Google Scholar

Laurent, J. (1999b) ‘Les limites de la conformité à la nature selon Plotin’, in Plotin, des principes: Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg 8: 11–21.Google Scholar

Lavaud, L. (2008) D'une Métaphysique à l'autre: Figures de l'altérité dans la philosophie de Plotin. Paris.CrossRef Google Scholar

Le Boulluec, A. (1998a) ‘La place des concepts philosophiques dans la réflexion de Philon sur le plaisir’, in Philon d'Alexandrie et le langage de la philosophie, ed. Lévy, C.. Turnhout: 129–52.Google Scholar

Le Boulluec, A. (1998b) ‘Vingts Ans de recherches sur le Contre Celse: Etat des lieux’, in Discorsi di verità: Paganesimo, giudaismo e cristianesimo a confronto nel Contro Celso di Origene, ed. Perrone, L.. Rome: 9–28.Google Scholar

Leone, G. (2012) see EpicurusGoogle Scholar

Linguiti, A. (1997) see Plotinus, Casaglia et al.Google Scholar

Linguiti, A. (2001) ‘Sulla felicità dell'anima non discesa’, in Antichi e Moderni nella filosofia di età imperiale, ed. Brancacci, A.. Naples: 213–36.Google Scholar

Longo, A. (2001) ‘L'arte e il teatro per spiegare il mondo: Plot., Enn. III 2’, SCO 47: 503–28.Google Scholar

Longo, A. (2015) ‘L'uso del termine paradeigma in Plotino e la causalità noetica, in particolare nel trattato 31 (Enn. V 8, cap. 7) Sul bello intelligibile’, DSTradF 26: 79–101.Google Scholar

Longo, A. (in press) ‘La maschera epicurea sul volto degli avversari’, in Il lato oscuro della tarda antichità, ed. Seng, H., Soares, L. and Tommasi, C.. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Maass, E. (1880) De biographis Graecis quaestiones selectae. Berlin.Google Scholar

Maggi, C. (2014) ‘Prospettiva universalistica e apostasia monadica: L'uno e i molti nel Contra Celsum’, in Dialogus: Il dialogo fra le religioni nel pensiero tardo-antico, medievale e umanistico, ed. Coppola, M., Fernicola, G. and Pappalardo, L.. Rome: 1–34.Google Scholar

Magrin, S. (2010) ‘Sensation and Scepticism in Plotinus’, OSAPh 39: 249–96.Google Scholar

Magris, A. (1998) ‘Platonismo e cristianesimo alla luce del Contro Celso’, in Discorsi di verità: Paganesimo, giudaismo e cristianesimo a confronto nel Contro Celso di Origene, ed. Perrone, L.. Rome: 47–79.Google Scholar

Magris, A. (2012) ‘Gli “altri gnosticismi” di Ippolito’, in ‘Ippolito’: Confutazione di tutte le eresie, ed. Magris, A., transl. and notes, with an introductory essay, by Castelli, E.. Brescia: 359–79.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1992) Heresiography in Context: Hyppolitus’ Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy. Leyden, New York and Cologne.CrossRef Google Scholar

Markschies, C. (2001) Die Gnosis. Munich.CrossRef Google Scholar

McNamee, K. (2007) Annotations in Greek and Latin Texts from Egypt. Chippenham.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mejer, J. (1992) ‘Diogenes Laertius and the Transmission of Greek Philosophy’, in ANRW, ed. Haase, W., II vol. 36.5. Berlin and New York: 3556–602.Google Scholar

Montoneri, L. (ed.) (1994) I filosofi greci e il piacere. Rome and Bari.Google Scholar

Moraux, P. (1967) ‘Alexander von Aphrodisias Quaest. 2.3’, Hermes 95: 159–69.Google Scholar

Moraux, P. (1970) D'Aristote à Bessarion: Trois exposés sur l'histoire et la transmission de l'Aristotélisme grec. Laval.Google Scholar

Moraux, P. (1973) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen. Berlin and New York.CrossRef Google Scholar

Morel, P.-M. (2002) ‘La sensation, messagère de l’âme. Plotin, V, 3 [49], 3’, in La Connaissance de soi: Sur le Traité 49 de Plotin, ed. Dixsaut, M. with the collaboration of Morel, P.-M. and Tordo-Rombaut, K.. Paris: 209–27.Google Scholar

Morel, P.-M. (2003) ‘Corps et cosmologie dans la physique d'Epicure, Lettre à Hérodote, § 45’, RMM 37: 33–49.Google Scholar

Morel, P.-M. (2008) ‘Method and Evidence: On the Epicurean Preconception’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 23: 25–48.Google Scholar

Morel, P.-M. (2009) Epicure: La Nature et la raison. Paris.Google Scholar

Moreschini, C. (2005) Storia della filosofia patristica, 2nd edn. Brescia.Google Scholar

Narbonne, J.-M. (1997) La Quête du beau comme itinéraire intérieur chez Plotin. Aix-en-Provence.Google Scholar

Narbonne, J.-M. (2011) Plotinus in Dialogue with the Gnostics. Leyden.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ninci, M. (2010) ‘La cosa e il suo perché: Intelligibile e sensibile in Plotino’, in L'essere del pensiero: Saggi sulla filosofia di Plotino, ed. Taormina, D. P. with the collaboration of O'Meara, D. J. and Riedweg, Ch.. Naples: 139–213.Google Scholar

Oliver, J. H. (1977) ‘The Diadochê at Athens under the Humanistic Emperors’, AJPh 98: 160–8.Google Scholar

Oliver, J. H. (1989) Greek Constitutions of Early Roman Emperors. Philadelphia.Google Scholar

O'Meara, D. J. (1999) ‘Epicurus Neoplatonicus’, in Zur Rezeption der hellenistischen Philosophie in der Spätantike, ed. Fuhrer, Th. and Erler, M.. Stuttgart: 83–91.Google Scholar

O'Meara, D. J. (2000) ‘Scepticism and Ineffability in Plotinus’, Phronesis 45: 240–51.CrossRef Google Scholar

O'Meara, D. J. (2002) ‘Scepticisme et ineffabilité chez Plotin’, in La Connaissance de soi: Sur le Traité 49 de Plotin, ed. Dixsaut, M. with the collaboration of Morel, P.-M. and Tordo-Rombaut, K.. Paris: 91–103.CrossRef Google Scholar

Parma, C. (1971) Pronoia und Providentia: Der Vorsehungsbegriff Plotins und Augustins. Leyden.CrossRef Google Scholar

Perrone, L. (1998) ‘Proposta per un commento: Un'esemplificazione su Contro Celso I, 9–13’, in Discorsi di verità: Paganesimo, giudaismo e cristianesimo a confronto nel Contro Celso di Origene, ed. Perrone, L.. Rome: 225–56.Google Scholar

Perrone, L. (2001) ‘Prayer in Origen's Contra Celsum: The Knowledge of God and the Truth of Christianity’, VCr 55: 1–19.Google Scholar

Petit, A. (2002) see PlotinusGoogle Scholar

Pizzani, U. (2001) ‘La polemica antiepicurea in Lattanzio’, in Cultura latina cristiana tra terzo e quinto secolo. Florence: 171–203.Google Scholar

Polito, R. (2012) ‘Antiochus and the Academy’, in The Philosophy of Antiochus, ed. Sedley, D.. Cambridge: 31–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pradeau, J.-F. (2006) see PlotinusGoogle Scholar

Puech, H.-Ch. (1978) ‘Plotin et les Gnostiques’, in En quête de la gnose. Paris: 110–16.Google Scholar

Ramelli, I. (2005) see Diogenes LaertiusGoogle Scholar

Repici, L. (2011) ‘La sensazione in Lucrezio’, AntPhilos 5: 51–82.Google Scholar

Rist, J. (1967) Plotinus: The Road to Reality. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rizzi, M. (1998) ‘Problematiche politiche nel dibattito tra Celso e Origene’, in Discorsi di verità: Paganesimo, giudaismo e cristianesimo a confronto nel Contro Celso di Origene, ed. Perrone, L.. Rome: 171–224.Google Scholar

Rudolph, K. (2000) La gnosi: Natura e storia di una religione tardoantica. Brescia.Google Scholar

Runia, D. T. (1999) Filone di Alessandria nella prima letteratura cristiana: Uno studio d'insieme. Milan.Google Scholar

Rutten, Ch. (1999) ‘Le plaisir chez Aristote et chez Plotin’, in La Fêlure du plaisir: Etudes sur le Philèbe de Platon. 2. Contextes, ed. Dixsaut, M. with the collaboration of Teisserenc, F. Paris: 149–68.Google Scholar

Saffrey, H. D. (1975) ‘Allusions anti-chrétiennes chez Proclus, le diadoque platonicien’, RSPh 59: 553–63, reprinted in Saffrey 1990: 201–11.Google Scholar

Saffrey, H. D. (1990) Recherches sur le néoplatonisme après Plotin. Paris.Google Scholar

Salem, J. (1989) Tel un Dieu parmi les hommes: L'Ethique d'Epicure. Paris.Google Scholar

Schmid, W. (1951) ‘Götter und Menschen in der Theologie Epikurs’, RhM 94: 7–156.Google Scholar

Schmid, W. (1984) Epicuro e l'epicureismo cristiano, transl. Ronca, I.. Brescia [orig. 1961].Google Scholar

Schniewind, A. (2003) L'Ethique du sage chez Plotin: Le Paradigme du spoudaios. Paris.Google Scholar

Schniewind, A. (2007) see PlotinusGoogle Scholar

Schniewind, A. (2008) ‘La phronesis est une sorte d'epilogismos…: A propos d'un concept épicurien chez Plotin, Ennéade I 3, 6, 8–14’, in Le Jugement pratique: Autour de la notion de PHRONÈSIS, ed. Lories, D. and Rizzerio, L.. Paris: 199–214.Google Scholar

Schwartz, E. (1903) ‘Diogenes Laertios’, in RE vol. V.1. Stuttgart, reprinted in Schwartz (1957).Google Scholar

Schwartz, E. (1957) Griechische Geschichtsschreiber. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Schwyzer, H.-R. (1971) ‘Plotins und Platos Philebos’, RIPh 97: 181–93.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (1976) ‘Epicurus and the Mathematics of Cyzicus’, CErc 6: 23–54.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2003) ‘Philodemus and the Decentralisation of Philosophy’, CErc 33: 31–41.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (2007) Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity, Italian transl. (2011) by Verde, F.. California.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sedley, D. N. (ed.) (2012) The Philosophy of Antiochus. Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sfameni Gasparro, G. (2013) La conoscenza che salva. Lo Gnosticismo: temi e problemi. Soveria Mannelli.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (1982) ‘Alexander of Aphrodisias on Divine Providence: Two Problems’, CQ 32: 198–211.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W. (2002) ‘Aristotelian Theology after Aristotle’, in Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, Its Background and Aftermath, ed. Frede, D. and Laks, A.. Leyden, Boston and Cologne: 1–40.Google Scholar

Simonetti, M. (1966) ‘Psychè et psychicòs nella gnosi valentiniana’, RSLR 1: 2–47.Google Scholar

Simonetti, M. (1998) ‘La Sacra Scrittura nel Contro Celso’, in Discorsi di verità: Paganesimo, giudaismo e cristianesimo a confronto nel Contro Celso di Origene, ed. Perrone, L.. Rome: 97–114.Google Scholar

Sleeman, J. H. and Pollet, G. (1980) Lexicon Plotinianum. Leyden and Leuven.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, A. (2006) ‘The Object of Perception in Plotinus’, in Eriugena, Berkeley and the Idealist Tradition, ed. Gersh, S. and Moran, D.. Notre Dame, Ind.: 14–38, reprinted in Smith 2011: 95–104.Google Scholar

Smith, A. (2011) Plotinus, Porphyry and Iamblichus: Philosophy and Religion in Neoplatonism. Farnham.Google Scholar

Smith, M. F. (1996) ‘An Epicurean Priest from Apamea in Syria’, ZPE 112: 125–7.Google Scholar

Spinelli, E. (in press) ‘Senza teodicea: Critiche epicuree e argomentazioni pirroniane’, in Questioni epicuree: Epistemologia, fisica, etica e le loro tradizioni, ed. De Sanctis, D., Spinelli, E., Tulli, M. and Verde, F.. Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar

Stalley, R. F. (1983) An Introduction to Plato's Laws. Oxford.Google Scholar

Steel, C. (1978) The Changing Self. A Study on the Soul in Later Neoplatonism: Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus. Brussels.Google Scholar

Steel, C. (2008) ‘Liberté divine ou liberté humaine? Proclus et Plotin sur ce qui dépend de nous’, in All'eu moi katalexon…/ Mais raconte-moi en détail (Od. III 97): Mélanges de philosophie et de philologie offerts à Lambros Couloubaritsis. Brussels and Paris: 525–42.Google Scholar

Szlezák, Th. A. (1979) Platon und Aristoteles in der Nuslehre Plotins. Basle and Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Taormina, D. P. (2010) ‘Plotino e Porfirio sul messaggero e il re: Nota sulla conoscenza di sé secondo Plotino, Trattato 49, 3. 44–4. 1’, in L'essere del pensiero: Saggi sulla filosofia di Plotino, ed. Taormina, D. P. with the collaboration of O'Meara, D. J. and Riedweg, Ch.. Naples: 245–66.Google Scholar

Taormina, D. P. (2013a) ‘Il n'y a pas d'homme, lâche ou brave, qui ait échappé à sa Moira (Il. VI 488–9). Porphyre vs. les stoïciens sur l'autonomie individuelle et l'origine du mal’, Chora 11: 23–35.Google Scholar

Taormina, D. P. (2013b) ‘Porfirio ha scritto un trattato Peri tou eph'hemin?’, in Plato Revived: Essays on Ancient Platonism in Honour of Dominic J. O'Meara. Berlin: 199–214.CrossRef Google Scholar

Taormina, D. P. (2014) ‘Choice (hairesis), Self-Determination (to autexousion) and What is in Our Power (to eph'hêmin) in Porphyry's Interpretation of the Myth of Er’, in What is Up to Us? Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy, ed. Destrée, P., Salles, R. and Zingano, M.. Sankt Augustin: 265–82.Google Scholar

Tardieu, M. (1992) ‘Les Gnostiques dans La Vie de Plotin’, in Porphyre: La Vie de Plotin, ed. Brisson, L. et al., vol. II. Paris: 503–63.Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. (2003) Chrysippus’ On Affections. Leyden.CrossRef Google Scholar

Torhoudt, A. (1942) Een onbekend gnostisch systeem in Plutarchus’ De Iside et Osiride. Leuven.Google Scholar

Tortorelli Ghidini, M. (1996) ‘L'ambigua presenza di Epicuro in Plotino’, in Epicureismo greco e romano, ed. Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M. (2 vols.). Naples: vol. II 987–97.Google Scholar

Toulouse, S. (2008) ‘Les chaires impériales à Athènes aux IIe et IIIe siècles’, in L'Enseignement supérieur dans les mondes antiques et médiévaux, ed. Hugonnard-Roche, H.. Paris: 127–74.Google Scholar

Trouillard, J. (1958) ‘Agir par son être même ou la causalité selon Proclus’, RSR 32: 347–57.CrossRef Google Scholar

Trouillard, J. (1977) ‘Les degrés du poiein chez Proclos’, Dionysius 1: 69–84.Google Scholar

Tulli, M. (2000) ‘L'epitome di Epicuro e la trasmissione del sapere nel medioplatonismo’, in Epikureismus in der späten Republik und der Kaiserzeit, ed. Erler, M. and Bees, R.. Stuttgart: 109–21.Google Scholar

Turner, J. D. (2001) Sethian Gnosticism and the Platonic Tradition. Québec and Paris.Google Scholar

Turner, J. D. and Majercik, R. (eds.) (2000) Gnosticism and Later Platonism. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Van Bremen, R. (2005) ‘Plotina to all her friends: The Letter(s) of the Empress Plotina to the Epicureans in Athens’, Chiron 35: 499–532.Google Scholar

Van Riel, G. (2000) Pleasure and the Good Life: Plato, Aristotle, and the Neoplatonists. Leyden.CrossRef Google Scholar

Velissaropoulou-Karakosta, E. (2000) ‘Ο Αδριανός και η διαδοχή του Επικούρου’, in Τιμαί Τριανταφυλλόπουλου;. Athens: 317–33.Google Scholar

Vegetti, M. (1989) L'etica degli antichi. Rome and Bari.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2008) ‘Rebus ab ipsis consequitur sensus: Il tempo in Epicuro’, Elenchos 29: 91–117.CrossRef Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2010) ‘Ancora su Timasacora epicureo’, Elenchos 31: 285–317.CrossRef Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2013) Epicuro. Rome.Google Scholar

Verde, F. (2014) ‘Elachista’: La dottrina dei minimi nell'Epicureismo. Leuven.Google Scholar

Von der Mühll, P. (1965) ‘Was Diogenes Laertios der Dame, der er sein Buch widmen will, ankündigt’, Philologus 109: 313–15, reprinted in Von der Mühll 1976: 388–90.Google Scholar

Von der Mühll, P. (1976) Ausgewählte kleine Schriften. Basle.Google Scholar

Wallis, R. T. (1987) ‘Scepticism and Neoplatonism’, in ANRW, ed. Haase, W., II vol. 32.2. Berlin and New York: 911–54.Google Scholar

Warren, J. (2001) ‘Epicurus and the Pleasures of the Future’, OSAPh 21: 135–79.Google Scholar

Warren, J. (2006a) ‘Epicureans and the Present Past’, Phronesis 51: 362–87.CrossRef Google Scholar

Warren, J. (2006b) ‘Psychic Disharmony: Philoponus and Epicurus on Plato's Phaedo’, OSAPh 30: 235–59.Google Scholar

Warren, J. (ed.) (2009) The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wellmann, M. (1919) ‘Eine pythagorische Urkunde des IV Jahr. v. Chr.’, Hermes 54: 225–48.Google Scholar

Whittaker, J. (1989) ‘507 Atticus’, DPhA, vol. I: d'Abam(m)on à Axiothéa. Paris: 664–5.Google Scholar

Wilamowitz-Moellendorff von, U. (1880) Epistula ad Maassium. Berlin.Google Scholar

Wilamowitz-Moellendorff von, U. (1881) Antigonos von Karystos. Berlin.Google Scholar

Williams, M. A. (1996) Rethinking ‘Gnosticism’: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category. Princeton.CrossRef Google Scholar

Witt, R. E. (1971) Albinus and the History of the Middle Platonism. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Woolf, R. (2009) ‘Pleasure and Desire’, in The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism, ed. Warren, J.. Cambridge: 158–78.Google Scholar

Zambon, M. (2011) ‘Porfirio e Origene, uno status quaestionis’, in Le Traité de Porphyre contre les chrétiens: Un siècle de recherches, nouvelles questions, ed. Morlet, S.. Paris: 107–64.Google Scholar

Zamora Calvo, J. M. (2003) ‘Entre la academia y el pórtico: La sympátheia en Plotino’, Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 29, 1: 97–121.Google Scholar

Zeller, E. and Mondolfo, R. (1964) La filosofia dei greci nel suo sviluppo storico, I vol. II. Florence (1st edn 1938; German orig. 1921).Google Scholar