Skip to main content

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
Cancel
×
×
Home
  • Home
Chapter
  • Get access
    Buy the print book
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    Log in Register Recommend to librarian
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    Crossref Citations
    Crossref logo
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.
    Rehfeld, Andrew 2011. The Child as Democratic Citizen. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 633, Issue. 1, p. 141.
    REHFELD, ANDREW 2011. The Concepts of Representation. American Political Science Review, Vol. 105, Issue. 03, p. 631.
    ×
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: June 2012

9 - On quotas and qualifications for office

Export citation
Summary

Introduction

In every existing democracy, qualifications for office restrict who may run for various elected offices. Most frequently, these qualifications require that the candidate be older than a certain minimal age, that she be a citizen of the nation in which she is running, and that she be a member of the party or resident of the district that she stands to represent. Increasingly, qualifications for office are being crafted based on gender, race, and ethnicity. In the last twenty years, dozens of democratic governments around the globe have established secured seats in the legislature or on party lists for women (Baldez 2004; Krook 2006). And the effect of other rules and circumstances – such as the need for large sums of money to mount a campaign in the United States – has created virtual qualifications for office, stacking the deck in favor of some kinds of candidates at the expense of others.

The use of qualifications is hardly new, nor is the desire to use them to achieve desirable results. For example, on December 4, 1820, in a debate on alterations to the Massachusetts State Constitution, Daniel Webster defended the inclusion of a “profession of belief” in Christian principles as a qualification for office (Webster 1903). As a general matter, Webster argued, the use of qualifications for office was consistent with principles of representative government that depended on voters themselves making good principled judgments about the types of people who should represent them.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Political Representation
  • Online ISBN: 9780511813146
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813146
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *

CAPTCHA *

Skip to the audio challenge
×
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Baldez, Lisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: The Gender Quota Law for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (May): 231–58.
Beitz, Charles R. 1989. Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Christiano, Thomas. 1996. Rule of the Many. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Constant, Benjamin. 1988. “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns,” in Benjamin Constant: Political Writings, ed. Biancamaria, Fontana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 308–28.
Dahl, Robert. 1991. Democracy and its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dahlerup, Drude (ed.). 2006. Women, Quotas and Politics. New York: Routledge.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Estlund, David. 2007. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Goodin, Robert. 1995. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Guizot, François. 2002. The History of the Origins of Representative Government in Europe, trans. Craiutu, Aurelian. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press.
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Harrington, James. 1992 [1656]. The Commonwealth of Oceana. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, Stephen. 1995. Passions and Constraint. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hume, David. 1987. “Idea of a Perfect Commonwealth,” in Essays: Moral Political and Literary, ed. Miller, Eugene F.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 512–29.
James, Michael. 2004. Deliberative Democracy and the Plural Polity. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
Keyssar, Alexander. 2000. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States, with a New Afterword. New York: Basic Books.
Kittilson, Miki Caul. 2006. Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Krook, Mona. 2006. “Reforming Representation: The Diffusion of Candidate Gender Quotas Worldwide.” Politics and Gender 2 (3): 303–27.
Krook, Mona. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, Will. 1996. Multicultural Citizenship. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lerner, Ralph. 1995. “Giving Voice.” Paper presented at the Giornate Atlantiche di Storia Constituzionale, Laboratorio di Storia Constituzionale “Antoine Barnave,” Università degli Studi di Macerata.
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McCormick, John. 2006. “Contain the Wealthy and Patrol the Magistrates: Restoring Elite Accountability to Popular Government.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 147–63.
MacGilvray, Eric. 2004. Reconstructing Public Reason. New York: Harvard University Press.
Madison, James. 1961 [1787–8]. The Federalist, ed. Cooke, Jacob E.. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks And Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28.
Mill, John Stuart. 1991 [1861]. Considerations on Representative Government. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Opello, K. A. R. 2006. Gender Quotas, Parity Reform, and Political Parties in France. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Phillips, Herbert. 1921. The Development of the Residential Qualification for Representatives in Colonial Legislatures. Cincinnati, OH: Abingdon Press.
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Rakove, Jack. 1996. Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2002. “Representation,” in Dictionary of American History. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2005. The Concept of Constituency: Political Representation, Democratic Legitimacy and Institutional Design. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2006. “Towards a General Theory of Political Representation.” Journal of Politics 68 (1): 1–21.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2008. “Extremism in Moderation: A Response to my Critics.” Polity 40 (2): 254–71.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009. “Representation Rethought: Trustees, Delegates and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 102 (2): 214–30.
Schwartzberg, Melissa. 2007. Democracy and Legal Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Shapiro, Ian. 1996. Democracy's Place. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Smith, Rogers. 1996. Civic Ideals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Waldron, Jeremy. 2002. God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke's Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Webster, Daniel. 1903 [1820]. “Testimony Before the Massachusetts Constitutional Convention,” in The Writings and Speeches of Daniel Webster. Boston: Little, Brown: vol. III, 3–7.
Williams, Melissa S. 1998. Voice, Trust, and Memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cancel
Confirm
×