Kraft, Jonas 2018. Political parties and public investments: a comparative analysis of 22 Western democracies. West European Politics, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 128.
Häusermann, Silja 2018. The multidimensional politics of social investment in conservative welfare regimes: family policy reform between social transfers and social investment. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 25, Issue. 6, p. 862.
Garritzmann, Julian L. Busemeyer, Marius R. and Neimanns, Erik 2018. Public demand for social investment: new supporting coalitions for welfare state reform in Western Europe?. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 25, Issue. 6, p. 844.
Lockwood, Matthew 2018. Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, p. 1.
Rovny, Jan and Polk, Jonathan 2018. New wine in old bottles. Party Politics, p. 135406881775251.
Häusermann, Silja Kurer, Thomas and Wüest, Bruno 2018. Participation in hard times: how constrained government depresses turnout among the highly educated. West European Politics, Vol. 41, Issue. 2, p. 448.
Hooghe, Liesbet and Marks, Gary 2018. Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 109.
Otjes, Simon Ivaldi, Gilles Jupskås, Anders Ravik and Mazzoleni, Oscar 2018. It's not Economic Interventionism, Stupid! Reassessing the Political Economy of Radical Right-wing Populist Parties. Swiss Political Science Review,
Damhuis, Koen and Karremans, Johannes 2017. Responsive to whom? A comparison of the Mitterrand and Hollande presidencies. West European Politics, Vol. 40, Issue. 6, p. 1267.
Toots, Anu and Lauri, Triin 2017. Varieties of Social Investment Policies on Two Sides of the Baltic Sea: Explaining Routes to Endurance. Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 51, Issue. 4, p. 550.
Kriesi, Hanspeter 2015. Enlightened Understanding, Empowerment and Leadership - Three Ways to Enhance Multiculturalism: Comment on Will Kymlicka’s article: “Solidarity in Diverse Societies”. Comparative Migration Studies, Vol. 3, Issue. 1,
Afonso, Alexandre and Papadopoulos, Yannis 2015. How the Populist Radical Right Transformed Swiss Welfare Politics: From Compromises to Polarization. Swiss Political Science Review, Vol. 21, Issue. 4, p. 617.
There is a contrast in the way voter preferences are conceptualized in two strands of current literature: While most of the comparative political economy literature implicitly or explicitly theorizes voter preferences on economic and social policies and their relevance for party choice in terms of – mostly unidimensional – distributive conflict, the literature on political parties and elections that deals with the determinants of party choice has always emphasized the importance of alternative, “second” dimensions of political conflict (see, e.g., Lipset and Rokkan 1967, Kitschelt 1994, Kitschelt and McGann 1995, Rokkan 2000, Bartolini 2000, Hooghe et al. 2002, Kriesi et al. 2006, 2008, Bornschier 2010, De la O and Rodden 2008).
We argue in this chapter that both strands of literature should integrate each other's insights. More specifically, we contend that in order to understand the challenges political parties face in contemporary capitalist democracies, the findings from both strands of literature need to be combined for several reasons: First of all, the European political space cannot be reduced to a single dimension of political conflict and competition, but has always been and still is structured by at least two conflict lines. The coexistence of two (or more) dimensions of conflict fundamentally alters the way we ought to view the electoral landscape and has critical implications for the way preferences are related to party choice. Moreover, the boundaries between distributional (economic) and identity-based (cultural) conflicts have become increasingly blurred: Issues such as welfare chauvinism, the unequal effects of welfare states on men and women, or the distributive balance between labor market insiders and outsiders have a clear distributive relevance, but they also relate to (more culturally connotated) considerations of a universalist versus particularist organization of the society and of social solidarity. Many economic, distributive struggles are thus inherently pluridimensional (see, e.g., Manow 2002, Manow and van Kersbergen 2009, Kitschelt and McGann 1995, Häusermann 2010, 2012).
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.