Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-m4fzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-09T18:52:00.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 October 2025

Roman Birke
Affiliation:
Dublin City University
Get access

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Population Control as a Human Right
International Law and the Global Quest to Curb Overpopulation
, pp. 198 - 213
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Columbia University Archives, New York City (CUA)

National Archives of Ireland, Dublin (NAI)

Rockefeller Archive Center, Tarrytown (NY) (RAC)

Sophia Smith Collection Archives, Northampton (MA) (SSCA)

United Nations Archives, New York City (UNA NYC)

United Nations Archives, Geneva (UNA GVA)

United States National Archives, College Park (MD) (USNA CP)

World Health Organization Archives, Geneva (WHOA)

Accampo, Elinor Ann. “The Gendered Nature of Contraception in France: Neo-Malthusianism, 1900-1920.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 34, no. 2 (September 29, 2003): 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acts of the Oireachtas. “Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1935.” www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/1935/act/6/section/17/enacted/en/html#sec17. Accessed July 31, 2019.Google Scholar
African Union. African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights. Nairobi: African Union, 1981.Google Scholar
Ahluwalia, Sanjam, and Parmar, Daksha. “From Gandhi to Gandhi: Contraceptive Techniques and Sexual Politics in Postcolonial India, 1947-1977.” In Reproductive States: Global Perspectives on the Invention and Implementation of Population Policy, edited by Solinger, Rickie and Nakachi, Mie, 124–55. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Aly, Götz, and Roth, Karl Heinz. Die restlose Erfassung. Volkszählen, Identifizieren, Aussondern im Nationalsozialismus. 2nd ed. Frankfurt am Main: FISCHER Taschenbuch, 2000.Google Scholar
Bailey, Martha J.Reexamining the Impact of Family Planning Programs on US Fertility: Evidence from the War on Poverty and the Early Years of Title X.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 4, no. 2 (April 2012): 6297.Google ScholarPubMed
Baird, Karen L.Globalizing Reproductive Control: Consequences of the ‘Global Gag Rule.’” In Linking Visions: Feminist Bioethics, Human Rights, and the Developing World, edited by Tong, Rosemarie, Donchin, Anne, and Dodds, Susan, 133–46. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.Google Scholar
Baker, Andrew. Constructing a Post-War Order: The Rise of US Hegemony and the Origins of the Cold War. London: I.B. Tauris, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashford, Alison, and Levine, Philippa, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195373141.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard. “Beyond Family Planning.” Studies in Family Planning 1, no. 38 (1969): 116.10.2307/1964767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berelson, Bernard. “The Present State of Family Planning Programs.” Studies in Family Planning 1, no. 57 (1970): 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besemeres, John F. Socialist Population Politics: The Political Implications of Demographic Trends in the USSR and Eastern Europe. M. E. Sharpe, 1980.Google Scholar
Bienvenu, Richard, ed. The Ninth of Thermidor: The Fall of Robespierre. New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Birke, Roman. “Zwischen Aktivismus und Diplomatie. Eleanor Roosevelts Bedeutung für internationale Menschenrechte, 1936-1962.” In Menschenrechte und Geschlecht im 20. Jahrhundert. Historische Studien, edited by Birke, Roman and Sachse, Carola, 7297. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2018.Google Scholar
Bock, Gisela. Frauen in der europäischen Geschichte. Vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart. München: Beck, 2000.Google Scholar
Boston Women’s Health Collective. Our Bodies, Ourselves. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1973.Google Scholar
Bourbonnais, Nicole. Birth Control in the Decolonizing Caribbean: Reproductive Politics and Practice on Four Islands, 1930-1970. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.10.1017/9781316339930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boye, Abd-el Kader, Hill, Kathleen, Isaacs, Stephen, and Gordis, Deborah. “Marriage Law and Practice in the Sahel.” Studies in Family Planning 22, no. 6 (1991): 343–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bracke, Maud Anne. “Contesting ‘Global Sisterhood’: The Global Women’s Health Movement, the United Nations and the Different Meanings of Reproductive Rights (1970s–80s).” Gender & History 35 (2023): 811–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracke, Maud Anne. “Women’s Rights, Family Planning, and Population Control: The Emergence of Reproductive Rights in the United Nations (1960s–70s).” The International History Review 44 (2022): 751–71.10.1080/07075332.2021.1985585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brzezinski, Zbigniew. The New Dimensions of Human Rights. Morgenthau Memorial Lecture on Ethics & Foreign Policy 14. New York: Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs, 1995.Google Scholar
Burke, Roland. Decolonization and the Evolution of International Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Burke, Roland. “From Individual Rights to National Development. The First UN International Conference on Human Rights, Tehran, 1968.” Journal of World History 19, no. 3 (2008): 275–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, John, and Caldwell, Pat. Limiting Population Growth and the Ford Foundation Contribution. London: Frances Pinter, 1986.Google Scholar
Callahan, Daniel. Ethics and Population Limitation. Philadelphia, PA: The Population Council, 1971.Google Scholar
Callahan, Daniel and Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences. Ethics, Population, and the American Tradition. A Study Prepared for the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future. Vol. 1. 3 vols. (Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences, 1971).Google Scholar
Callahan, Sidney. “Procreation and Control.” In The Catholic Case for Contraception, edited by Callahan, Daniel, 4164. London: Arlington Books, 1969.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. “The Climate of History: Four Theses.” Critical Inquiry 35, no. 2 (2009): 197222.10.1086/596640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charrad, Mounira M.Gender in the Middle East: Islam, State, Agency.” Annual Review of Sociology 37 (2011): 417–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Columbia University Faculty of Medicine and Center for Population and Family Health. The Development Law & Policy Program: Report of Activities 1983/1958. New York: Development Law and Policy Program, 1986.Google Scholar
Commission on Population Growth and the American Future. Population and the American Future: The Report of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1972.Google Scholar
Connelly, Matthew. Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Connelly, Matthew. “Population Control in India: Prologue to the Emergency Period.” Population and Development Review 32, no. 4 (December 2006): 629–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, Matthew. “Seeing beyond the State: The Population Control Movement and the Problem of Sovereignty.” Past & Present, no. 193 (2006): 197–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Rebecca J.The Legal Promotion of the Right to Family Planning.” In The Human Right to Family Planning: Report of the Working Group on the Promotion of Family Planning as a Basic Human Right, edited by Working Group on the Promotion of Family Planning as a Basic Human Right, Appendix 1. New York: International Planned Parenthood Federation, 1983.Google Scholar
Cook, Rebecca J.U.S. Population Policy, Sex Discrimination, and Principles of Equality under International Law.” Journal of International Law and Politics 20, no. 1 (1987): 93142.Google Scholar
Cook, Robert C. “Two Billion People versus Time: A Conservationist Issues a Warning – and Offers a Program to Save the Day.” New York Times Book Review, August 8, 1948.Google Scholar
Corfman, Eunice, and Brown, Peter G.. “An Historical Analysis of Some Moral-Political Values as These Bear on Population Control and Distribution.” In Ethics, Population, and the American Tradition: A Study Prepared for the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future, edited by Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences, Vol. 2, A1–144 (Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: Institute of Society, Ethics and the Life Sciences, 1971).Google Scholar
Council of Europe, and Dankert, Piet. Consultative Assembly of the Council of Europe. Report on Birth Control, Family Planning and the Problem of Abortion in the Council of Europe Member States, 20 September 1972, Doc.3166. Council of Europe, 1972.Google Scholar
Cull, Nicholas J. The Cold War and the United States Information Agency: American Propaganda and Public Diplomacy, 1945-1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.10.1017/CBO9780511817151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, Mary E. The Slow Failure: Population Decline and Independent Ireland, 1920-1973. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Davis, Kingsley. “Population Policy: Will Current Programs Succeed?Science 158, no. 3802 (1967): 730–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, Kingsley. “The World Demographic Transition.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 237 (1945): 111.10.1177/000271624523700102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desrochers, Pierre, and Hoffbauer, Christine. “The Post War Intellectual Roots of the Population Bomb. Fairfield Osborn’s ‘Our Plundered Planet’ and William Vogt’s ‘Road to Survival’ in Retrospect.” The Electronic Journal of Sustainable Development 1, no. 3 (2009): 3761.Google Scholar
Dhar, Kaushik. Domestic Implementation of Human Rights. Rochester, NY: National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR) University, 2012.10.2139/ssrn.2007967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Division for the Advancement of Women and Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. Ending Violence against Women: From Words to Action: Study of the Secretary-General. New York: United Nations, 2006.Google Scholar
Dixon-Mueller, Ruth. Population Policy & Women’s Rights. Transforming Reproductive Choice. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1993.Google Scholar
Dixon-Mueller, Ruth. “U.S. International Population Policy and ‘The Woman Question.’Journal of International Law and Politics 20, no. 1 (1987): 143–67.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Peter J. Nature against Us: The United States and the World Population Crisis 1965-1980. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Peter J.On the Origins of the United States Government’s International Population Policy.” Population Studies 44, no. 3 (1990): 385–99.10.1080/0032472031000144816CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drezgić, Rada. “Policies and Practices of Fertility Control under the State Socialism.” The History of the Family 15, no. 2 (June 10, 2010): 191205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudziak, Mary L.Brown as a Cold War Case.” The Journal of American History 91, no. 1 (2004): 3242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudziak, Mary L.. Cold War Civil Rights. Race and the Image of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Duranti, Marco. The Conservative Human Rights Revolution: European Identity, Transnational Politics, and the Origins of the European Convention. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199811380.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eager, Paige Whaley. “From Population Control to Reproductive Rights: Understanding Normative Change in Global Population Policy (1965–1994).” Global Society 18, no. 2 (2004): 145–73.10.1080/1360082042000207483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eager, Paige Whaley. Global Population Policy: From Population Control to Reproductive Rights. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Eckel, Jan. The Ambivalence of Good: Human Rights in International Politics since the 1940s. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Eckel, Jan. “The International League for the Rights of Man, Amnesty International, and the Changing Fate of Human Rights Activism from the 1940s through the 1970s.” Humanity 4, no. 2 (2013): 183214.10.1353/hum.2013.0014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckel, Jan. “‘Under a Magnifying Glass’: The International Human Rights Campaign against Chile in the Seventies.” In Human Rights in the Twentieth Century, edited by Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig, 321–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Eder, Franz X. Kultur der Begierde. Eine Geschichte der Sexualität. 2nd ed. München: C.H. Beck, 2009.Google Scholar
Education Committee of the Fertility Guidance Company. Family Planning: A Guide for Parents and Prospective Parents. Dublin: Fertility Guidance Co. Ltd, 1971.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Paul. The Population Bomb. New York: Ballantine Books, 1968.Google Scholar
Emmott, Stephen. Ten Billion. New York: Vintage Books, 2013.Google Scholar
Engelman, Peter C. A History of the Birth Control Movement in America. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2011.10.5040/9798400665523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. Brief an Karl Kautsky vom 1. Februar 1881. Vol. 35. Marx Engels Werke. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, n.d.Google Scholar
Engels, Friedrich. Die Lage der arbeitenden Klasse in England. Vol. 2. Marx Engels Werke. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1972.Google Scholar
Estrada-Claudio, Sylvia. “The International Women and Health Meetings: Catalyst and End Product of the Global Feminist Health Movement.” Workshop “Transnationalisation of Solidarities and Women Movements,” Université de Montréal, April 27–28, 2006.Google Scholar
Etzemüller, Thomas. “The Population Discourse: A Transnational Matrix – the Case of Germany and Sweden.” Historical Social Research 36, no. 2 (2011): 101–19.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman, 1995.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard A.World Population and International Law.” The American Journal of International Law 63, no. 3 (1969): 514–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feliciano, Myrna S.Law, Gender, and the Family in the Philippines.” Law & Society Review 28, no. 3 (1994): 547.10.2307/3054074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felitti, Karina. “Birthrate, Sovereignty, and Development: The Reception of the Birth Control Pill in Buenos Aires in the Sixties.” In “Wenn die Chemie stimmt …”. Geschlechterbeziehungen und Geburtenkontrolle im Zeitalter der “Pille,” edited by Satjukow, Silke and Niethammer, Lutz, 331–51. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2016.Google Scholar
Ferriter, Diarmaid. Occasions of Sin: Sex and Society in Modern Ireland. London: Profile Books, 2009.Google Scholar
Finkle, Jason L., and Crane, Barbara B.. “The Politics of Bucharest: Population, Development, and the New International Economic Order.” Population and Development Review 1, no. 1 (1975): 87114.10.2307/1972272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, Leslie, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Reproductive Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Francome, Colin. Unsafe Abortion and Women’s Health: Change and Liberalization. New York: Routledge, 2016.10.4324/9781315548968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Marc. “Neo-Malthusianism and Development: Shifting Interpretations of a Contested Paradigm.” Journal of Global History 6, no. 1 (March 2011): 7597.10.1017/S1740022811000052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galey, Margaret E.Women Find a Place.” In Women, Politics, and the United Nations, edited by Winslow, Anne, 1128. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1995.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded. “The Demographic Transition: Causes and Consequences.” NBER Working Paper Series Working Paper 17057 (2011).Google Scholar
Galton, Francis. “Africa for the Chinese.” The Times. http://galton.org/letters/africa-for-chinese/AfricaForTheChinese.htm. Accessed July 31, 2019.Google Scholar
Garcia-Moreno, Claudia, and Claro, Amparo. “Challenges from the Women’s Health Movement: Women’s Rights versus Population Control.” In Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights, edited by Sen, Gita, Germain, Adrienne, and Chen, Lincoln C., 4761. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Germain, Adrienne, Nowrojee, Sia, and Pyne, Hnin Hnin. “Setting a New Agenda: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights.” In Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights, edited by Sen, Gita, Germain, Adrienne, and Chen, Lincoln C., 2746. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Geoffrey. World Population: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, 2005.Google Scholar
Gilman, Nils. “The New International Economic Order: A Reintroduction.” Humanity – An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, Development 6, no. 1 (2015): 116.10.1353/hum.2015.0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Paul. “The Politics of the Family in Twentieth-Century Europe.” Contemporary European History 9, no. 3 (2000): 411–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. The Transformation of Family Law: State, Law, and Family in the United States and Western Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Global Policy Forum. “United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Income and Expenditure, 1971-2011,” 2011. www.globalpolicy.org/images/pdfs/UNFPA_Income_and_Expenditure_1974-2011.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2025.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, Susan. “Science, Modernity, and the Making of China’s One-Child Policy.” Population and Development Review 29, no. 2 (2003): 163–96.10.1111/j.1728-4457.2003.00163.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Peter M.Introduction. Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46, no. 1 (1992): 135.10.1017/S0020818300001442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagel, Alisa Von, and Mansbach, Daniela. Reproductive Rights in the Age of Human Rights: Pro-Life Politics from Roe to Hobby Lobby. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldermann, John W.Programs of the United Nations and Associated Organizations.” In Population and Law: A Study of the Relation between Population Problems and Law, edited by Lee, Luke T. and Larson, Arthur, 387436. Durham, NC: Rule of Law Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Hardin, Garrett. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162, no. 3859 (1968): 1243–48.10.1126/science.162.3859.1243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harkavy, Oscar, and Roy, Krishna. “Emergence of the Indian National Family Planning Program.” In The Global Family Planning Revolution. Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs, edited by Robinson, Warren C. and Ross, John A., 301–23. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007.Google Scholar
Harris, Alana, ed. The Schism of ’68: Catholicism, Contraception and “Humanae Vitae” in Europe, 1945-1975. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-70811-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Betsy. Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control. Boston, MA: South End Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Heim, Susanne, and Schaz, Ulrike. Berechnung und Beschwörung. Überbevölkerung - Kritik einer Debatte. Göttingen: Verlag der Buchläden Schwarze Risse / Rote Strasse, 1996.Google Scholar
Hitler, Adolf. Mein Kampf. 691st–695th ed. München: Zentralverlag der NSDAP, Franz Eher Nachf., 1942.Google Scholar
Horn, Gerd-Rainer. The Spirit of Vatican II: Western European Progressive Catholicism in the Long Sixties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horvath, Robert. “Russia’s Reversal on Human Rights: Nationalists and the Putin Regime’s Rejection of International Norms.” In Embattled Visions: Human Rights since 1990, edited by Eckel, Jan and Stahl, Daniel, 207–30. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2022.Google Scholar
Hug, C. The Politics of Sexual Morality in Ireland. London: Palgrave, 2016.Google Scholar
Hugh Moore Fund. The Population Bomb. New York: Hugh Moore Fund, 1954.Google Scholar
Humanity. “Special Issue: Toward a History of the New International Economic Order.” Humanity – An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, Development 6, no. 1 (2015).Google Scholar
Iglesias, Enrique V.Latin America and the Creation of a New International Economic Order.” Economic Bulletin for Latin America 19, no. 1/2 (1975): 19.Google Scholar
International Planned Parenthood Federation. “As Human Rights Year Ends, the Challenge Is Implementation.” International Planned Parenthood News, no. 178 (December 1968).Google Scholar
International Planned Parenthood Federation. “Cambridge Students Launch Fund Raising Drive.” International Planned Parenthood News, no. 179 (January 1969).Google Scholar
International Planned Parenthood Federation. “Encyclical Disappoints Many Catholics.” International Planned Parenthood News, no. 175 (September 1968).Google Scholar
International Planned Parenthood Federation. “Family Planning: Vital Ingredient in 1968 Human Rights Campaign.” International Planned Parenthood News, no. 166 (December 1967).Google Scholar
International Planned Parenthood Federation. “New Law Awaited in Canada.” International Planned Parenthood News, no. 180 (February 1969).Google Scholar
International Planned Parenthood Federation, ed. “Planned Parenthood – a Duty and a Human Right.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of the International Planned Parenthood Federation, Santiago, Chile, April 9–15, 1967. Hertford: Stephen Austin and Sons, 1967.Google Scholar
International Planned Parenthood Federation, The Sixth International Conference on Planned Parenthood. Report of the Proceedings, February 14–21, 1959, Vigyan Bhavan, New Delhi, India. London, 1959.Google Scholar
International Women’s Health Coalition. “Women’s Declaration on Population Policies.” Development in Practice 3, no. 2 (1993): 116–21.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Stephen L. Population Law and Policy: Source Materials and Issues. New York: Human Sciences Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Stephen L., Cairns, Gail S., and Heckel, Nancy I.. Population Policy: A Manual for Policymakers and Planners. New York: Development Law and Policy Program, 1985.Google Scholar
Jansen, Jan C., and Osterhammel, Jürgen. Decolonization: A Short History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Jeraj, Mateja. “Vida Tomšič.” In Biographical Dictionary of Women’s Movements and Feminisms in Central, Eastern, and South Eastern Europe: 19th and 20th Centuries, edited by de Haan, Francisca, Daskalova, Krasimira, and Loutfi, Anna, 575–79. Budapest: Central European University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Jian, Chen, Klimke, Martin, Kirasirova, Masha, Nolan, Mary, Young, Marilyn, and Waley-Cohen, Joanna, eds. The Routledge Handbook of the Global Sixties: Between Protest and Nation-Building. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018.10.4324/9781315150918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joachim, Jutta. Agenda Setting, the UN, and NGOs: Gender Violence and Reproductive Rights. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter. “Group Rights.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. Stanford, CA: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/rights-group/. Accessed March 11, 2025.Google Scholar
Jones, Peter. “Human Rights, Group Rights, and Peoples’ Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 21, no. 1 (1999): 80107.10.1353/hrq.1999.0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapor-Stanulovic, Nila, and David, Henry Philip. “Former Yugoslavia and Successor States.” In From Abortion to Contraception: A Resource to Public Policies and Reproductive Behavior in Central and Eastern Europe from 1917 to the Present, edited by David, Henry Philip, Skilogianis, Joanna, and Posadskaya-Vanderbeck, Anastasia, 279316. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, 1999.Google Scholar
Katz, Esther, Engelman, Peter C., and Hajo, Moran, eds. The Selected Papers of Margaret Sanger, Volume 4: Round the World for Birth Control, 1920-1966. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Kaupen-Haas, Heidrun, ed. Der Griff nach der Bevölkerung. Aktualität und Kontinuität nazistischer Bevölkerungspolitik. Schriften der Hamburger Stiftung für Sozialgeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts 1. Nördlingen: Greno, 1986.Google Scholar
Kautsky, Karl. Der Einfluß der Volksvermehrung auf den Fortschritt der Gesellschaft. Wien: Bloch und Hasbach, 1880.Google Scholar
Kellogg, Alfred. “Population Growth and International Law.” Cornell International Law Journal 3, no. 1 (January 1, 1970): 93104.Google Scholar
Kelly, Laura. Contraception and Modern Ireland: A Social History, c.1922-92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.10.1017/9781108979740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinzelbach, Katrin. “Human Rights in Chines Foreign Policy: A Battle for Global Public Opinion.” In Handbook on Human Rights in China, edited by Biddulph, Sarah and Rosenzweig, Joshua, 84103. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2019.Google Scholar
Kinzelbach, Katrin. “Weißbuch Menschenrechte in China (1991).” In Quellen zur Geschichte der Menschenrechte. Kommentierte Schlüsseltexte, edited by Stahl, Daniel, 307–67. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2021.Google Scholar
Kirk, Dudley. “Population Changes and the Postwar World.” American Sociological Review 9, no. 1 (February 1944): 2835.10.2307/2086020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, I.Population Growth and Mortality in British India Part II: The Demographic Revolution.” Indian Economic & Social History Review 27, no. 1 (March 1, 1990): 3363.10.1177/001946469002700102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Renate, and FINRRAGE. “Reflections on Cairo: Empowerment Rhetoric – but Who Will Pay the Price?” FINRRAGE, 1994. www.finrrage.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Reflections_on_Cairo_Renate_Klein.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2025.Google Scholar
Kline, Wendy. Bodies of Knowledge: Sexuality, Reproduction, and Women’s Health in the Second Wave. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.10.7208/chicago/9780226443072.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kline, Wendy. “The Making of Our Bodies, Ourselves: Rethinking Women’s Health and Second-Wave Feminism.” In Feminist Coalitions: Historical Perspectives on Second-Wave Feminism in the United States, edited by Gilmore, Stephanie, 6383. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Klose, Fabian, ed. The Emergence of Humanitarian Intervention: Ideas and Practice from the Nineteenth Century to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Korey, W. NGO’s and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.10.1057/9780230108165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870-1960. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Krastev, Ivan, and Holmes, Stephen. “Populisms in Eastern Europe: A Demographic Anxiety.” Le Débat 204, no. 2 (2019): 161–69.Google Scholar
Kudaisya, Medha. “‘A Mighty Adventure’: Institutionalising the Idea of Planning in Post-Colonial India, 1947-60.” Modern Asian Studies 43, no. 4 (2009): 939–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kühl, Stefan. For the Betterment of the Race: The Rise and Fall of the International Movement for Eugenics and Racial Hygiene. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.10.1057/9781137286123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampe, John R. Yugoslavia as History: Twice There Was a Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Lecomte, Jean, and Abd-El-Kadar-Laraqui, . “Morocco.” Studies in Family Planning 6, no. 8 (1975): 311–13.10.2307/1964989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Luke T.Legal Implications of the World Population Plan of Action,” The Journal of International Law and Economics 9, no. 3 (1975): 375417.Google Scholar
Lee, Luke T., “Population-Related Laws in the Less-Developed-Countries.” In The World Population Crisis: Policy Implications and the Role of Law. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law Regional Meeting and The John Bassett Moore Society of International Law Symposium, edited by Paxman, John M., 8690. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Lee, Luke T., Sipilä, Helvi, Green, Marshall, and Koh, T.T.B.. “Population and Human Rights: Expanding Frontiers of International Law.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 70 (1976): 105123.10.1017/S0272503700017717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leo, Annette, and König, Christian. Die “Wunschkindpille”: Weibliche Erfahrung und Staatliche Geburtenpolitik in der DDR. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2015.Google Scholar
Leridon, Henri. “Fertility, the Family and Human Rights.” In Population and Human Rights. Proceedings of the Symposium on Population and Human Rights, Vienna, 29 June–3 July 1981, 8499. New York: United Nations, 1983.Google Scholar
Lestapis, Stanislas de. Family Planning and Modern Problems: A Catholic Analysis. London: Burns & Oates, 1961.Google Scholar
Lieberman, S. S., Gillespie, Robert, and Loghmani, M.. “The Isfahan Communication Project.” Studies in Family Planning 4, no. 4 (1973): 73100.10.2307/1964793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeffler, James. Rooted Cosmopolitans: Jews and Human Rights in the Twentieth Century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Lorimer, Frank. “Issues of Population Policy.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 237, no. 1 (January 1, 1945): 193203.10.1177/000271624523700121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luddy, Maria. “Marriage, Sexuality and the Law in Ireland.” In The Cambridge Social History of Modern Ireland, edited by Daly, Mary E. and Biagini, Eugenio F., 344–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael Rask. “From Cold War Instrument to Supreme European Court: The European Court of Human Rights at the Crossroads of International and National Law and Politics.” Law & Social Inquiry 32, no. 1 (2007): 137–59.10.1111/j.1747-4469.2007.00053.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Mikael Rask. “The Challenging Authority of the European Court of Human Rights: From Cold War Legal Diplomacy to the Brighton Declaration and Backlash.” Law and Contemporary Problems 79, no. 1 (2016): 141–78.Google Scholar
Maguire, Daniel C., ed. Sacred Rights: The Case for Contraception and Abortion in the World Religions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malthus, Thomas Robert. An Essay on the Principle of Population, As It Affects the Future Improvement of Society. London: Joseph Johnson, 1798.Google Scholar
Margulies, Lazar. “History of Intrauterine Devices.” Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 51, no. 5 (May 1975): 662–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Marks, Lara. “Human Guinea Pigs? The History of the Early Oral Contraceptive Clinical Trials.” History and Technology 15, no. 4 (January 1, 1999): 263–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Elaine Tyler. America and the Pill: A History of Promise, Peril, and Liberation. New York: Basic Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Mesner, Maria. Geburten/Kontrolle. Reproduktionspolitik im 20. Jahrhundert. Wien: Böhlau, 2010.10.26530/OAPEN_437179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesquita, Cecilia. “Women’s Health during Brazil’s Transition to Democracy: The History of PAISM.” In “Wenn die Chemie stimmt …”. Geschlechterbeziehungen und Geburtenkontrolle im Zeitalter der “Pille”, edited by Satjukow, Silke and Niethammer, Lutz, 352–68. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2016.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Johnson C.The Case for Compulsory Regulation of Reproduction.” In The World Population Crisis: Policy Implications and the Role of Law. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law Regional Meeting and The John Bassett Moore Society of International Law Symposium, edited by Paxman, John M., 6775. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Moore, Richard. “Family Planning in Iran, 1960-79.” In The Global Family Planning Revolution: Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs, edited by Robinson, Warren C. and Ross, John A., 3357. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007.Google Scholar
Morgen, Sandra. Into Our Own Hands: The Women’s Health Movement in the United States, 1969-1990. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Morina, Christina. Die Erfindung des Marxismus. Wie eine Idee die Welt eroberte. München: Siedler, 2017.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. Christian Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. Not Enough: Human Rights in an Unequal World. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. “Personalism, Community, and the Origins of Human Rights.” In Human Rights in the Twentieth Century, edited by Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig, 85106. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Murray, Peter. “The Best News Ireland Ever Got?” In The Schism of ’68: Catholicism, Contraception and “Humanae Vitae” in Europe, 1945-1975, edited by Harris, Alana, 275301. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-70811-9_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. Population: A Problem for Democracy. The Godkin Lectures, 1938. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Nakachi, Mie. “Liberation without Contraception? The Rise of the Abortion Empire and Pronatalism in Socialist and Postsocialist Russia.” In Reproductive States: Global Perspectives on the Invention and Implementation of Population Policy, edited by Solinger, Rickie and Nakachi, Mie, 290328. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199311071.003.0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanda, Ved P.Can International Law Cope with the Population Crisis?” In The World Population Crisis: Policy Implications and the Role of Law. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law Regional Meeting and The John Bassett Moore Society of International Law Symposium, edited by Paxman, John M., 113–19. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Nathans, Benjamin. “Die Entzauberung des Sozialismus. Sowjetische Dissidenten, Menschenrechte und die neue globale Moralität.” In Moral für die Welt? Menschenrechtspolitik in den 1970er Jahren, edited by Eckel, Jan and Moyn, Samuel, 100–19. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2012.Google Scholar
Nelson, Jennifer. More than Medicine: A History of the Feminist Women’s Health Movement. New York: NYU Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Nelson, Jennifer. Women of Color and the Reproductive Rights Movement. New York: NYU Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Nelson, William Max. Enlightenment Biopolitics: A History of Race, Eugenics, and the Making of Citizens. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2024.10.7208/chicago/9780226825571.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niethammer, Lutz. “Die Gottesgabe sexueller Lust als Vorgeschmack auf ein Paradies der Männer. Zur Grundlegung der tausendjährigen Geschichte islamischer Geburtenkontrolle durch Imam Abu Hamid al-Ghazali.” In “Wenn die Chemie stimmt …”. Geschlechterbeziehungen und Geburtenkontrolle im Zeitalter der “Pille”, edited by Satjukow, Silke and Niethammer, Lutz, 3562. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2016.Google Scholar
Nixon, Richard. “Remarks on Signing Bill Establishing the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future.” March 16, 1970. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/240990. Accessed March 11, 2025.Google Scholar
Nolan, Mary. “Gender and Utopian Visions in a Post-Utopian Era: Americanism, Human Rights, Market Fundamentalism.” Central European History 44, no. 1 (2011): 1336.10.1017/S0008938910001160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nortman, Dorothy. “Population and Family Planning Programs: A Factbook.” Reports on Population/Family Planning 1971 Edition, no. 2 (June 1971): 1–48.Google Scholar
Notestein, Frank W.Demographic Work of the United Nations.” Population Index 16, no. 3 (1950): 184–93.10.2307/2730608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, Fairfield. Our Plundered Planet. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1948.Google Scholar
Osborn, Frederick. Preface to Eugenics. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1940.Google Scholar
Packenham, Robert A. Liberal America and the Third World: Political Development Ideas in Foreign Aid and Social Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Partan, Daniel G. Population in the United Nations System: Developing the Legal Capacity and Programs of UN Agencies. Law and Population Book Series 3. Leiden: Rule of Law Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Paulmann, Johannes, ed. Dilemmas of Humanitarian Aid in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Paxman, John M., ed. “Discussion.” In The World Population Crisis: Policy Implications and the Role of Law. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law Regional Meeting and The John Bassett Moore Society of International Law Symposium, 119–30. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Paxman, John M., The World Population Crisis: Policy Implications and the Role of Law. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law Regional Meeting and The John Bassett Moore Society of International Law Symposium. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Pechatnoiv, Vladimir O.The Soviet Union and the World, 1944-1953.” In The Cambridge History of the Cold War, Volume I, edited by Leffler, Melvyn P. and Westad, Odd Arne, 90111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.10.1017/CHOL9780521837194.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, William. “Marxism and the Population Question: Theory and Practice.” Population and Development Review 14 (1988): 77101.10.2307/2808091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilpel, Harriet F.Legal Impediments to Voluntarism.” In The World Population Crisis: Policy Implications and the Role of Law. Proceedings of the American Society of International Law Regional Meeting and The John Bassett Moore Society of International Law Symposium, edited by Paxman, John M., 8690. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Pison, Gilles, and US National Research Council, eds. Population Dynamics of Senegal. Population Dynamics of Sub-Saharan Africa Series. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Plotkin, Stanley. “History of Vaccination.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, no. 34 (August 26, 2014): 12283–87.10.1073/pnas.1400472111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, Pope VI. “Gaudium et Spes. Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World.” December 7, 1965. www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19651207_gaudium-et-spes_ge.html. Accessed March 11, 2025.Google Scholar
Paul, Pope “Humanae Vitae. On the Regulation of Birth.” July 25, 1968. http://w2.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/de/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_25071968_humanae-vitae.html. Accessed March 11, 2025.Google Scholar
Paul, Pope “Populorum Progressio. On the Development of Peoples.” March 26, 1967. www.vatican.va/content/paul-vi/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_26031967_populorum.html. Accessed March 11, 2025.Google Scholar
Population Council. “Declaration of Population.” Studies in Family Planning 1, no. 16 (1967): 110.2307/1964890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajagopal, Arvind. “The Emergency as Prehistory of the New Indian Middle Class.” Modern Asian Studies 45, no. 5 (2011): 1003–49.10.1017/S0026749X10000314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddle, John M. Eve’s Herbs. A History of Contraception and Abortion in the West. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Riley, Barry. The Political History of American Food Aid: An Uneasy Benevolence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.10.1093/oso/9780190228873.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Thomas. The Malthusian Moment: Global Population Growth and the Birth of American Environmentalism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2012.10.2307/j.ctt5hjdm1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Warren C.Family Planning Programs and Policies in Bangladesh and Pakistan.” In The Global Family Planning Revolution. Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs, edited by Robinson, Warren C. and Ross, John A., 235–56. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007.10.1596/978-0-8213-6951-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Warren C., and Ross, John A., eds. The Global Family Planning Revolution: Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007.10.1596/978-0-8213-6951-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockefeller, III, John D. Population and the Role of the Developed World. Lecture Series on Population. World Population Year, Bucharest 1974. International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, 1974.Google Scholar
Romano, Renee. “No Diplomatic Immunity: African Diplomats, the State Department, and Civil Rights, 1961-1964.” The Journal of American History 87, no. 2 (2000): 546–79.10.2307/2568763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roosevelt, Eleanor. “My Day.” December 15, 1959. www2.gwu.edu/~erpapers/myday/. Accessed July 31, 2019.Google Scholar
Rosenboim, Or. The Emergence of Globalism: Visions of World Order in Britain and the United States, 1939-1950. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Ross, John A., Han, Dae Woo, Keeny, S. M., Cernada, George P., Hsu, T. C., and Sun, T. H.. “Korea/Taiwan 1969: Report on the National Family Planning Programs.” Studies in Family Planning 1, no. 54 (1970): 116.10.2307/1965338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubinstein, Alvin Z. Yugoslavia and the Nonaligned World. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Sachse, Carola. “What Research, to What End? The Rockefeller Foundation and the Max Planck Gesellschaft in the Early Cold War.” Central European History 42, no. 1 (2009): 97141.10.1017/S0008938909000041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachse, Carola, and Grossmann, Atina. “Human Rights, Utopias, and Gender in Twentieth-Century Europe: Introduction.” Central European History 44, no. 1 (2011): 112.10.1017/S0008938910001159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saille, Stevienna de. Knowledge as Resistance: The Feminist International Network of Resistance to Reproductive and Genetic Engineering. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.10.1057/978-1-137-52727-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, Rafael M. “Brief an Kurt Waldheim vom 23. August 1977.” UNA NYC, Secretary-General - Kurt Waldheim, Special Programmes, Population, S-0971-0010-05, 1977.Google Scholar
Sanger, Alexander C. “Stellungnahme von International Planned Parenthood auf der Weltbevölkerungskonferenz in Kairo 1994,” 1994. www.unfpa.org/resources/statement-international-planned-parenthood. Accessed March 11, 2025.Google Scholar
Sanger, Margaret. An Autobiography. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1938.Google Scholar
Sanger, Margaret, ed. Proceedings of the World Population Conference, Held at the Salle Centrale, Geneva, August 29th to September 3rd, 1927. London: Edward Arnold, 1927.Google Scholar
Satjukow, Silke, and Niethammer, Lutz, eds. “Wenn die Chemie stimmt ….” Geschlechterbeziehungen und Geburtenkontrolle im Zeitalter der “Pille.” Göttingen: Wallstein, 2016.Google Scholar
Schwab, Dieter. “Gleichberechtigung und Familienrecht im 20. Jahrhundert.” In Frauen in der Geschichte des Rechts. Von der frühen Neuzeit bis zur Gegenwart, edited by Gerhard, Ute. München: C.H. Beck, 1999.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Michael. “‘Proletarier’ Und ‘Lumpen’. Sozialistische Ursprünge Eugenischen Denkens.” Vierteljahrshefte Für Zeitgeschichte 42, no. 4 (1994): 537–70.Google Scholar
Selden, Steven. “Transforming Better Babies into Fitter Families: Archival Resources and the History of the American Eugenics Movement, 1908-1930.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 149, no. 2 (2005): 199225.Google ScholarPubMed
Sen, Gita, Germain, Adrienne, and Chen, Lincoln C., eds. Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, and Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Shah Commission of Inquiry. Third and Final Report. New Delhi, 1978.Google Scholar
Shannon, William H. The Lively Debate: Response to Humanae Vitae. New York: Sheed & Ward, 1970.Google Scholar
Singh, Jyoti Shankar. Creating a New Consensus on Population: The Politics of Reproductive Health, Reproductive Rights and Women’s Empowerment. 2nd ed. London: Earthscan, 2009.Google Scholar
Sipilä, Helvi. Status of Women and Family Planning: Report of the Special Rapporteur Appointed by the Economic and Social Council Under Resolution 1326 (XLIV). New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, 1975.Google Scholar
Sluga, Glenda. “The Transformation of International Institutions: Global Shock as Cultural Shock.” In The Shock of the Global: The 1970s in Perspective, edited by Ferguson, Niall, Maier, Charles S., Manela, Erez, and Sargent, Daniel J., 223–36. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sobotka, Tomás. “The Stealthy Sexual Revolution? Birth Control, Reproduction, and Family under State Socialism in Central and Eastern Europe.” In “Wenn die Chemie stimmt …”. Geschlechterbeziehungen und Geburtenkontrolle im Zeitalter der “Pille”, edited by Satjukow, Silke and Niethammer, Lutz, 121–50. Göttingen: Wallstein, 2016.Google Scholar
Stoddard, Lothrop. The Rising Tide of Color against White World-Supremacy. New York: Scribner, 1921.Google Scholar
Suitters, Beryl. Be Brave and Angry: Chronicles of the International Planned Parenthood Federation. London: International Planned Parenthood Federation, 1973.Google Scholar
Svensson, Marina. Debating Human Rights in China: A Conceptual and Political History. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar
Symonds, Richard, and Carder, Michael. The United Nations and the Population Question 1945–1970. London: Chatto & Windus, 1973.Google Scholar
Thompson, Warren S.Population.” American Journal of Sociology 34, no. 6 (1929): 959–75.10.1086/214874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomšič, Vida. “Constitution of the SFRY and the Human Right to Free Decision on the Birth of Children. Report to the Symposium on Obstacles to the Realization of the Constitutional Right to Free Decision on the Birth of Children, Bled, 20-22 November, 1971.” In A Selection of Articles and Speeches on the Status of Women and Family Planning in Yugoslavia, edited by Pantić-Starič, Nada, 7393. Ljubljana: Federal Council for Family Planning, 1975.Google Scholar
Tomšič, Vida. “Family Planning and Population Policy. Theses Presented to the Symposium on Possible Elements of Society’s Population Policy in the SFRY, Belgrade, September 1973.” In A Selection of Articles and Speeches on the Status of Women and Family Planning in Yugoslavia, edited by Pantić-Starič, Nada, 3043. Ljubljana: Federal Council for Family Planning, 1975.Google Scholar
Tomšič, Vida. “Status of Women and Family Planning in Yugoslavia. Report Submitted to the UN Seminar on Status of Women and Family Planning, Istanbul, 11-24 July, 1972.” In A Selection of Articles and Speeches on the Status of Women and Family Planning in Yugoslavia, edited by Pantić-Starič, Nada, 929. Ljubljana: Federal Council for Family Planning, 1975.Google Scholar
Turda, Marius. “Race, Science, and Eugenics in the Twentieth Century.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, edited by Bashford, Alison and Levine, Philippa, 6279. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Turshen, Meredeth. Women’s Health Movements: A Global Force for Change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.10.1057/9780230607125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tydén, Mattias. “The Scandinavian States: Reformed Eugenics Applied.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics, edited by Bashford, Alison and Levine, Philippa, 363–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
United Nations Fund for Population Activities, and Lee, Luke T.. The United Nations and Population: Major Resolution and Instruments. Law and Population Book Series 7. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1974.Google Scholar
United Nations Population Division. Abortion Policies: A Global Review. New York: United Nations Publications, 2001.Google Scholar
United Nations Population Division. The World at Six Billion. New York: United Nations, 1999.Google Scholar
Visaria, Leela, and Ved, Rajani R.. India’s Family Planning Programme: Policies, Practices and Challenges. New York: Routledge, 2016.10.4324/9781315652498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, William. Road to Survival. New York: William Sloane Associates, 1948.Google Scholar
Warwick, Donald P. Bitter Pills: Population Policies and Their Implementation in Eight Developing Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Weidmann, Nils B., Kuse, Doreen, and Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede. “The Geography of the International System: The CShapes Dataset.” International Interactions 36, no. 1 (February 26, 2010): 86106.10.1080/03050620903554614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weindling, Paul. “From Disease Prevention to Population Control: The Realignment of Rockefeller Foundation Policies in the 1920s to 1950s.” In American Foundations and the Coproduction of World Order in the Twentieth Century, edited by Krige, John and Rausch, Helke, 125–45. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2012.Google Scholar
Weindling, Paul. “International Eugenics: Swedish Sterilization in Context.” Scandinavian Journal of History 24, no. 2 (1999): 179–97.10.1080/03468759950115791CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weindling, Paul. “Julian Huxley and the Continuity of Eugenics in Twentieth-Century Britain.” Journal of Modern European History 10, no. 4 (2012): 480–99.10.17104/1611-8944_2012_4_480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinke, Annette. “Von ‘Gentlemen Lawyers’ Und ‘Barfüßigen Richtern’. Zum Einfluss Juridischer Felder Auf Menschenrechtsdiskurse Und -Praktiken Seit 1945.” Geschichte in Wissenschaft Und Unterricht 66, no. 1/2 (2015): 2545.Google Scholar
Westoff, Charles F.The Commission on Population Growth and the American Future Its Origins, Operations, and Aftermath.” Population Index 39, no. 4 (1973): 491507.10.2307/2733834CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weydner, Sara. “Reproductive Rights and Reproductive Control: Family Planning, Internationalism, and Population Control in the International Planned Parenthood Federation.” Geschichte Und Gesellschaft 44, no. 1 (2018): 135–61.10.13109/gege.2018.44.1.135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Leigh Ann. How Sex Became a Civil Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Williams, Rebecca Jane. “Storming the Citadels of Poverty: Family Planning under the Emergency in India, 1975-1977.” The Journal of Asian Studies 73, no. 2 (May 2014): 471–92.10.1017/S0021911813002350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirsing, Giselher. Die Menschenlawine. Der Bevölkerungszuwachs als weltpolitisches Problem. Stuttgart: DtVerl-Anst, 1956.Google Scholar
Wright, Nicolas H.Early Family Planning Efforts in Sri Lanka.” In The Global Family Planning Revolution: Three Decades of Population Policies and Programs, edited by Robinson, Warren C. and Ross, John A., 341–62. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2007.Google Scholar
Životić, Aleksandar, and Čavoški, Jovan. “On the Road to Belgrade: Yugoslavia, Third World Neutrals, and the Evolution of Global Non-Alignment, 1954-1961.” Journal of Cold War Studies 18, no. 4 (2016): 7997.10.1162/JCWS_a_00681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zunz, Olivier. Philanthropy in America: A History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.10.1515/9781400850242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

The PDF of this book complies with version 2.2 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range of users and attains the highest (AAA) level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive accessibility guidelines.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Roman Birke, Dublin City University
  • Book: Population Control as a Human Right
  • Online publication: 09 October 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009601184.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Roman Birke, Dublin City University
  • Book: Population Control as a Human Right
  • Online publication: 09 October 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009601184.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Roman Birke, Dublin City University
  • Book: Population Control as a Human Right
  • Online publication: 09 October 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009601184.010
Available formats
×