References

Pekka Louhiala

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543982.011

Abramowicz, H. K., Richardson, S. A. 1975. Epidemiology of severe mental retardation in children: community studies. Am. J. Ment. Defic. 80: 18–39Google Scholar

Al-Jader, L., 1999. The achievements of antenatal screening programme for congenital abnormalities and lessons learned for clinical governance. J. Med. Genet. 36 (Suppl. 1): S70Google Scholar

Allardt, E. 1993. Having, Loving, Being: An alternative to the Swedish model of welfare research. In: Nussbaum, M. C., Sen, A. (Eds) The Quality of Life, pp. 88–94. Oxford: Clarendon Press

American Association on Mental Retardation 1992. Mental Retardation: Definition, Classification and Systems of Supports, 9th edn. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation

Arenson, E. B., Forde, M. D. 1989. Bone marrow transplantation for acute leukemia and Down syndrome: report of a successful case and results of a national survey. J. Pediatr. 114: 69–72Google Scholar

Arvio, M. 1993. Life with Aspartylglucosaminuria (Dissertation). Pääjärvi Rehabilitation Centre and Department of Child Neurology, University of Helsinki, Finland

Arvio, M., Sauna-Aho, O., Peippo, M. 2001. Bone marrow transplantation for aspartylglucosaminuria: follow-up study of transplanted and non-transplanted patients. J. Pediatr. 138: 288–90Google Scholar

Autti, T., Santavuori, P., Raininko, R., Renlund, M., Rapola, J., Saarinen-Pihkala, U. 1997. Bone-marrow transplantation in aspartylglucosaminuria. Lancet 349: 1366–7Google Scholar

Bahado-Singh, R., Shahabi, S., Karaca, M., Mahoney, M. J., Cole, L., Oz, U. A. 2002. The comprehensive midtrimester test: high-sensitivity Down syndrome test. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 186: 803–8Google Scholar

Baird, P. A., Sadovnick, A. D. 1988. Life expectancy in Down syndrome adults. Lancet ii: 1354–6Google Scholar

Behrman, R. E., Vaughan, V. C. (Eds) 1987. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, 13th edn. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders

Benjamin, J., Li, L., Patterson, C., Greenberg, B. D., Murphy, D. L., Hamer, D. H., 1996. Population and familial association between the D4 dopamine receptor gene and measures of Novelty Seeking. Nat. Genet. 12 (Jan): 81–4Google Scholar

Berger, M., Yule, W. 1985. IQ test and assessment. In: Clarke, A. M., Clarke, D. B., Berg, J. M. (Eds) Mental Deficiency: The Changing Outlook, pp. 53–95. Cambridge: Methuen and Co

Bianchi, D. W. 1995. Prenatal diagnosis by analysis of fetal cells in maternal blood. J. Pediatr. 127: 847–56Google Scholar

Block, N. J., Dworkin, G. 1974. IQ, Heritability and Inequality, Part 1. Philos. Public Affairs 3: 331–409Google Scholar

Block, N. J., Dworkin, G. 1975. IQ, Heritability and Inequality, Part 2. Philos. Public Affairs 4: 40–99Google Scholar

Boddington, P., Podpadec, T. 1991. Who are the mentally handicapped?J. Appl. Philos. 8: 177–90Google Scholar

Boorse, C. 1975. On the distinction between disease and illness. Philos. Public Affairs 5: 49–68Google Scholar

Booth, B. E., Verma, M., Singh, Beri R. 1994. Fetal sex determination in Punjab, India: correlations and implications. Br. Med. J. 309: 1259–61Google Scholar

Booth, T. 1985. Labels and their consequences. In: Lane, D., Stratford, B. (Eds) Current Approaches to Down's syndrome, pp. 3–24. Eastbourne: Holt, Rinehart and Winston

Borthwick-Duffy, S. A. 1996. Evaluation and measurement of quality of life: special considerations for persons with mental retardation. In: Schalock, R. L., Siperstein, G. N. (Eds) Quality of Life Volume I. Conceptualization and Measurement, pp. 105–19. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation

Bosk, C. L. 1992. All God's Mistakes. Genetic Counseling in a Pediatric Hospital. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

Boss, J. A. 1990. How voluntary prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion increase the abnormal human gene pool. Birth 17: 75–9Google Scholar

Boss, J. A. 1993. The Birth Lottery. Prenatal Diagnosis and Selective Abortion. Chicago: Loyola University Press

Bouchard, L., Renaud, M. 1997. Female and male physicians' attitudes toward prenatal diagnosis: a pan-Canadian survey. Soc. Sci. Med. 44: 381–92Google Scholar

Bourguignon, H. J. 1994. Mental retardation: the reality behind the label. Camb. Q. Health. Ethics 3: 179–94Google Scholar

Brambati, B., Formigli, L., Tului, L., Simoni, G. 1990. Selective reduction of quadruplet pregnancy at risk of Beta-thalassemia. Lancet 336: 1325–6Google Scholar

Bränholm, I. B., Degerman, E. A. 1992. Life satisfaction and activity preferences in parents of Down's syndrome children. Scand. J. Soc. Med. 20: 37–44Google Scholar

Br⊘ndum-Nielsen, K., N⊘rgaard-Pedersen, B. 1993. Prenatal diagnostik i Norden. Nordisk Medicin. 108: 189–92Google Scholar

Burleigh, M. 1994. Death and Deliverance. ‘Euthanasia’ in Germany 1900–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Burton, L. 1975. The Family Life of Sick Children. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul

Cairney, R. 1996. Democracy was never intended for degenerates: Alberta's flirtation with eugenics comes back to haunt it. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 155: 789–92Google Scholar

Callahan, D. 1996. The genetic revolution. In: Thomasma, D., Kushner, T. (Eds) Birth to Death. Science and Bioethics, pp. 13–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Campbell, A. V. 1984. Ethical issues in prenatal diagnosis. Br. Med. J. Clin. Res. Ed. 288: 1633–4

Canguilhem, G. 1978. On the Normal and the Pathological. Dordrecht: Reidel

Carr, J. 1995. Down's Syndrome Children Growing up. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Carter, C. O., Evans, K. A., Fraser, Roberts J. A., Buck, A. R. 1971. Genetic clinic follow-up. Lancet 1: 281–5Google Scholar

Cassell, E. J. 1995. Pain and suffering. In: Reich W. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 2nd edn, pp. 1897–1904. New York: Macmillan

Chadwick, R. 1993. What counts as success in genetic counseling?J. Med. Ethics 19: 43–6Google Scholar

Chadwick, R., Ngwena, C. 1992. The development of a normative standard in counselling for genetic disease: ethics and law. J. Soc. Welfare Fam. Law 4: 276–95Google Scholar

Chadwick, R., ten Have, H., Husted, J.et al. 1998. Genetic screening and ethics: European perspectives. J. Med. Philos. 23: 255–73Google Scholar

Chapple, J. C., Dale, R., Evans, B. G., 1987. The new genetic: will it pay its way?Lancet i: 1189–92Google Scholar

Clarke, A. 1990. Genetics, ethics and audit. Lancet 335: 1145–7Google Scholar

Clarke, A. 1991. Is non-directive genetic counselling possible?Lancet 338: 998–1001Google Scholar

Clarke, A. 1993. Response to: What counts as success in genetic counselling?J. Med. Ethics 19: 47–9Google Scholar

Clarke, A. (Ed.) 1994. Genetic Counselling. Practice and Principles. London: Routledge

Clarke, A. 1997a. Outcomes and processes in genetic counselling. In: Harper, P. S., Clarke, A. J. (Eds) Genetics, Society and Clinical Practice, pp. 165–78. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers

Clarke, A. 1997b. The process of genetic counselling: beyond non-directiveness. In: Harper, P. S., Clarke, A. J. Genetics, Society and Clinical Practice. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers

Clarke, A. M., Clarke, D. B., Berg, J. M. (Eds) 1985. Mental Deficiency: The Changing Outlook. Cambridge: Methuen and Co

Conrad, P. 1997. Public eyes and private genes: historical frames, new constructions, and social problems. Soc. Problems 44: 139–55Google Scholar

Conrad, P. 2001. Media images, genetics and culture: potential impacts of reporting scientific findings on bioethics. In: Barry Hoffmaster (Ed.) Bioethics in Social Context, pp. 90–111. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press

Copel, J. A., Bahado-Singh, R. O. 1999. Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome – a search for the family's values. New Engl. J. Med. 341: 521–2Google Scholar

Coulter, D. L. 1997. Health-related application of quality of life. In: Schalock, R. L., Siperstein, G. N. (Eds) Quality of Life Volume II. Application to Persons with Disabilities, pp. 95–104. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation

Cowan, R. S. 1994. Women's roles in the history of amniocentesis and chorionic villi sampling. In: Rothenberg, K. H., Thomson, E. J. (Eds) Women and Prenatal Testing, pp. 35–48. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press

Cuckle, H. 1998. Rational Down syndrome screening policy. Am. J. Public Health 88: 558–9Google Scholar

Dalgaard, O. Z., Norby, S. 1989. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in the 1980s. Clin. Genet. 36: 320–5Google Scholar

D'Alton, M. E., DeCherney, A. H. 1993. Prenatal diagnosis. New Engl. J. Med. 328: 114–20Google Scholar

Dodge, J. A. 1998. Gene therapy for cystic fibrosis: what message for the recipient?. Thorax 53: 157–8Google Scholar

Downie, R. S., Calman, K. C. 1994. Healthy Respect. Ethics in Health Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Durkin, M. S. 1996. Beyond mortality – residential placement and quality of life among children with mental retardation. Am. J. Public Health 86: 1359–60Google Scholar

Ebstein, R. P., Novick, O., Umansky, R. 1996. Dopamine D4 receptor (D4DR) exon III polymorphism associated with the human personality trait of novelty seeking. Nat. Genet. 12 (Jan): 78–80Google Scholar

Edgerton, R. B. 1996. A longitudinal ethnographic research perspective on quality of life. In: Schalock, R. L., Siperstein, G. N. (Eds) Quality of Life Volume I. Conceptualization and Measurement, pp. 83–90. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation

Edwards, S. 1997. The moral status of intellectually disabled individuals. J. Med. Philos. 22: 29–42Google Scholar

Engel, G. 1977. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 4286: 129–35Google Scholar

Engelhardt, H. T. 1986. The Foundations of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Evans, M. 1996. Some ideas of the person. In: Greaves, D., Upton, H. (Eds) Philosophical Problems in Health Care, pp. 23–35. Aldershot: Avebury

Evans, M. I., Hallak, M., Johnson, M. P. 1995. Genetic testing and screening: prenatal diagnosis. In: The Encyclopedia of Bioethics, pp. 986–91. New York, NY: Macmillan

Felce, D., Perry, J. 1996. Assessment of quality of life. In: Schalock, R. L., Siperstein, G. N. (Eds) Quality of Life Volume I. Conceptualization and Measurement, pp. 63–72. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation

Fricker, J. 1996. PET and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Lancet 347: 604Google Scholar

Friedmann, T. 1990. Opinion: the human genome project – some implications of extensive ‘reverse genetic’ medicine. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 46: 407–14Google Scholar

Froster, U. G., Jackson, L. 1996. Limb defects and chorionic villus sampling: results from an international registry, 1992–94. Lancet 347: 489–94Google Scholar

Fryers, T. 1984. The epidemiology of severe intellectual impairment. London: Academic Press

Fryers, T. 1992. Epidemiology and taxonomy in mental retardation. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 6: 181–92Google Scholar

Gates, E. A. 1994. Prenatal genetic testing: does it benefit pregnant women? In: Rothenberg, K. H., Thomson, E. J. (Eds) Women and Prenatal Testing, pp. 183–200. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press

Gath, A. 1990. Down syndrome children and their families. Am. J. Med. Genet. 7(Suppl.): 314–16Google Scholar

Gillam, L. 1999. Prenatal diagnosis and discrimination against the disabled. J. Med. Ethics 25: 163–71Google Scholar

Gillon, R. 1994. Philosophical Medical Ethics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons

Glass, B. 1971. Science: endless horizons or golden age?Science 171: 23–9Google Scholar

Goodey, C. 1997. Learning difficulties and the guardians of the gene. In: Clarke, A., Parsons, E. (Eds) Culture, Kinship and Genes, pp. 206–17. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan

Gracia, D. 1993. The intellectual basis of bioethics in Southern European countries. Bioethics 7: 97–107Google Scholar

Gräsbeck, R. 1995. Normaalin käsite lääketieteessä. In: Louhiala, P. Lääketiede ja filosofia, pp. 66–77. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino. (The concept of normal in medicine. In Finnish)

Gregg, I. 1994. A memorable patient. Divine intervention?Br. Med. J. 309: 928Google Scholar

Griffin, J. 1986. Well-being. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Grossman, H. J. (Ed.) 1983. Classification in Mental Retardation (3rd rev.). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Deficiency

Hagberg, G. 1992. Severe and mild mental retardation – the epidemiologists view. Abstracts of the Congress on Mental Retardation in Childhood, Oslo

Hallamaa, J. 1994. The Prisms of Moral Personhood. Helsinki: Luther-Agricola-Society

Hare, R. 1976. Survival of the weakest. In: Gorovitz, S. et al. (Eds) Moral Problems in Medicine, pp. 364–9. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Harper, P. S., Clarke, A. J. 1997. Genetics, Society and Clinical Practice. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers

Harris, J. 1985. The Value of Life. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul

Harris, J. 1998 a. Clones, Genes and Immortality. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Harris, J. 1998 b. Should we attempt to eradicate disability? In: Morscher, E. et al. (Eds) Applied Ethics in a Troubled World, pp. 105–14. Dordrecht: Kluwer

Hasle, H., Haunstrup, Clemmensen I., Mikkelsen, M. 2000. Risks of leukaemia and solid tumours in individuals with Down's syndrome. Lancet 355: 165–9Google Scholar

Hatton, C. 1998. Whose quality of life is it anyway? Some problems with the emerging quality of life consensus. Ment. Retard. 36: 104–15Google Scholar

Hauerwas, S. 1986. Suffering Presence. Theological Reflections on Medicine in the Mentally Handicapped and the Church. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Church

Häyry, H. 1991. The Limits of Medical Paternalism. London: Routledge

Häyry, M. 1990. Critical Studies in Philosophical Medical Ethics (Dissertation). Helsinki: University of Helsinki

Heal, L. W., Sigelman, C. K. 1996. Methodological issues in quality of life measurement. In: Schalock, R. L., Siperstein, G. N. (Eds) Quality of Life Volume I. Conceptualization and Measurement, pp. 91–104. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation

Hennekens, C. H., Buring, J. E. 1987. Epidemiology in Medicine. Boston: Little, Brown and Company

Herrnstein, R. J. 1994. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press

Hietala, M. 1998. Prospects for Genetic Screening in Finland (Dissertation). Turku: Annales Universitatis Turkuensis D 322

Hietala, M., Grön, K., Syvänen, A. -C., Peltonen, L., Aula, P. 1993. Prospects of carrier screening of aspartylglucosaminuria in Finland. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 1: 296–300Google Scholar

Hill, E. C. 1986. Your morality or mine? An inquiry into the ethics of human reproduction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 154: 1173–80Google Scholar

Hoedemaekers, R. 1998. Normative Determinanats of Genetic Screening and Testing (Ph.D. thesis). Wageningen: Eburon P&L

Holmes-Siedle, M., Ryynanen, M., Lindenbaum, R. H. 1987. Parental decisions regarding termination of pregnancy following prenatal detection of sex chromosome abnormality. Prenat. Diagn. 7: 239–44Google Scholar

Honderich, T. (Ed.) 1995. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Horgan, J. 1993. Eugenics revisited. Sci. Am. June: 92–100Google Scholar

Hubbard, R. 1986. Eugenics and prenatal testing. Int. J. Health Serv. 16: 227–42Google Scholar

Hughes, C., Hwang, B. 1996. Attempts to conceptualize and measure quality of life. In: Schalock, R. L., Siperstein, G. N. (Eds) Quality of Life Volume I. Conceptualization and Measurement, pp. 51–62. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation

Hunt, J. 1961. Intelligence and Experience. New York: Ronald Press

Imam, Z. 1994. India bans female feticide. Br. Med. J. 309: 428Google Scholar

Isoniemi, A., Hietala, M., Aula, P., Jalanko, A., Peltonen, L. 1995. Identification of a novel mutation causing aspartylglucosaminuria reveals a mutation hotspot region in the aspartylglucosaminuria gene. Hum. Mutat. 5: 318–26Google Scholar

Itälinna, M., Leinonen, E., Saloviita, T. 1994. Kultakutri karhujen talossa. Kehitysvammaisen lapsen perheen voimavarat ja selviytyminen. Tampere: Kehitysvammaisten tukiliitto. (The resources of a family with an intellectually disabled child. In Finnish)

Jallinoja, P. 2001. Genetic screening in maternity care: preventive aims and voluntary choices. Sociol. Health Illness 23: 286–307Google Scholar

Jackson, L. G. 1990. Commentary: Prenatal diagnosis: The magnitude of dysgenic effects is small, the human benefits, great. Birth 17: 80Google Scholar

Jones, S. 1996. In the Blood. God, Genes and Destiny. London: Flamingo/Harper Collins

Julian-Reynier, C., Aurran, Y., Dumaret, A.et al. 1995. Attitudes towards Down's syndrome: follow up of a cohort of 280 cases. J. Med. Gen. 32: 597–9Google Scholar

Kääriäinen, R., Piepponen, P., Vaskilampi, T. (Eds) 1985. A multi-disciplinary case-control study of mental retardation and subnormality in low birth cohorts. Kuopion Yliopiston Julkaisuja, Kausanterveystiede, Alkuperäistutkimukset nro 1

Karjalainen, S., Häyry, H. 1992. Luonnollisesta ja luonnottomasta. Ajatus 49: 7–13. (On the natural and the unnatural. In Finnish)Google Scholar

Kärki, R. 1998. Lääketiede julkisuudessa. Tampere: Vastapaino. (Medicine and publicity. In Finnish)

Kass, L. R. 1985. Toward a More Natural Science. New York: The Free Press

Kass, L. R. 1996. The troubled dream of nature as a moral guide. Hastings Cent. Rep. 26 (6): 22–4Google Scholar

Keith, K. D. 1996. Measuring quality of life across cultures: issues and challenges. In: Schalock, R. L., Siperstein, G. N. (Eds) Quality of Life Volume I. Conceptualization and Measurement, pp. 73–82. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation

Kent, A. P., Dornan, J. C. 1996. Judgment day in utero. Lancet 348 (Suppl II): 16Google Scholar

Kessler, S., Levine, E. K. 1987. Psychological aspects of genetic counselling. IV. The subjective assessment of probability. Am. J. Med. Genet. 28: 361–70Google Scholar

Kessler, S., Levine, E. K. 1989. Psychological aspects of genetic counselling. VI. Critical review of the literature dealing with education and reproduction. Am. J. Med. Genet. 34: 340–53Google Scholar

Khanna, S. K. 1997. Traditions and reproductive technology in an urbanizing north Indian village. Soc. Sci. Med. 44: 171–80Google Scholar

Kingston, H. M. 1994. ABC of Clinical Genetics. London: BMJ Publishing Group

Kishnani, P. S., Sullivan, J. A., Keith, Walter B., Spiridigliozzi, G. A., Doraiswamy, P. M., Rama, Krishnan K. R., 1999. Cholinergic therapy for Down's syndrome. Lancet 353: 1064–5Google Scholar

Kitcher, P. 1997. The Lives to Come. The Genetic Revolution and Human Possibilities. Harmondsworth: Penguin

Kopelman, L. 1984. Respect and the retarded: issues of valuing and labeling. In: Kopelman, L., Moskop, J. C. (Eds) Ethics and Mental Retardation, pp. 65–85. Dordrecht: Reidel

Kopelman, L., Irons, T. G., Kopelman, A. E. 1988. Neonatologists judge the ‘Baby Doe’ regulations. New Engl. J. Med. 318: 677–83Google Scholar

Kuhse, H., Singer, P. 1985. Should the Baby Live? Oxford: Oxford University Press

Kuppermann, M., Goldberg, J. D., Nease, R. F., Washington, A. E. 1999. Who should be offered prenatal diagnosis? The 35-year old question. Am. J. Public Health 89: 160–3Google Scholar

Kurtz, R. A. 1977. Social Aspects of Mental Retardation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books

Kusum, . 1993. The use of prenatal diagnosis for sex selection; the Indian scene. Bioethics 7: 149–65Google Scholar

Lancet 1982. Editorial. Directive counselling. ii: 368–9

Lauren, M. 1998. Ihmisen perimä sanomalehden sivuilla. Sosiologian pro gradu-tutkielma, Helsingin yliopisto 1998. (Human genetic heritage on the pages of a newspaper. MA thesis, University of Helsinki 1998. In Finnish)

Leonard, C. O., Chase, G. A., Childs, B. 1972. Genetic counseling: a consumer's view. New Engl. J. Med. 287: 433–9Google Scholar

Lewontin, R. 1997. Billions and billions of demons. New York Rev. Books Jan 9: 28–32; responses and reply March 6: 50–2Google Scholar

Lippman, A. 1994. Prenatal genetic testing and screening. Constructing needs and reinforcing inequities. In: Clarke, A. (Ed.) Genetic Counselling. Practice and Principles, pp. 142–86. London: Routledge

Lippman, A. 1999. Prenatal diagnosis (letter). Am. J. Public Health 89: 1592Google Scholar

Lippman, A., Wilfond, B. S. 1992. ‘Twice-told-stories’: Stories about genetic disorders. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 51: 936–7Google Scholar

Littlefield, J. W. 1969. Prenatal diagnosis and therapeutic abortion. New Engl. J. Med. 280: 722–3Google Scholar

Louhiala, P. 1993. Kehitysvammaisuuden perinataaliset tekijät. Jyväskylä: STAKES. Tutkimuksia 30. (Perinatal factors in mental retardation. Thesis in Finnish)

Lucassen, A. 1998. Ethical issues in genetic of mental disorders. Lancet 352: 1004–5Google Scholar

Macmillan, D. L., Gresham, F. M., Siperstein, G. N. 1993. Conceptual and psychometric concerns about the 1992 AAMR definition of mental retardation. Am. J. Ment. Retard. 98: 325–35Google Scholar

Marteau, T. M. 1995. Toward informed decisions about prenatal testing: a review. Prenat. Diagn. 15: 1215–26Google Scholar

Marteau, T. M., Drake, H. 1995. Attributions for disability: the influence of genetic screening. Soc. Sci. Med. 40: 1127–32Google Scholar

Marteau, T. M., Kidd, J., Cook, R.et al. 1991. Perceived risk not actual risk predicts uptake of amniocentesis. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 98: 282–6Google Scholar

Marteau, T. M., Slack, J., Kidd, J., Shaw, R. 1992. Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: practice observed. Public Health 106: 131–41Google Scholar

Marteau, T. M., Drake, H., Bobrow, M. 1994a. Counselling following diagnosis of fetal abnormality; the differing approaches of obstetricians, clinical geneticists and genetic nurses. J. Med. Genet. 31: 864–7

Marteau, T. M., Drake, H., Reid, M. 1994b. Counselling following diagnosis of fetal abnormality: a comparison between German, Portuguese and UK geneticists. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2: 96–102Google Scholar

Matikka, L. 2000. Comparability of quality-of-life-studies of the general population and people with intellectual disabilities. Scand. J. Disabil. Res. 2: 83–102Google Scholar

Matikka, L., Vesala, H. T. 1997. Acquiescence in quality-of-life interviews with adults who have mental retardation. Ment. Retard. 35: 75–82Google Scholar

Mayor, S. 1999. Parents of people with Down's syndrome report suboptimal case. Br. Med. J. 318: 687Google Scholar

McCullough, L. B. 1984. The world gained and the world lost: labeling the mentally retarded. In: Kopelman, L., Moskop, J. C. (Eds) Ethics and Mental Retardation, pp. 99–118. Dordrecht: Reidel

McGuffin, P., Thapar, A. 1997. Genetic basis of bad behaviour in adolescents. Lancet 350: 411–12Google Scholar

McLaughlin, J. F., Bjornson, K. F. 1998. Quality of life and developmental disabilities. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 40: 435Google Scholar

Michie, S., Bron, F., Bobrow, M., Marteau, T. M. 1997a. Nondirectivenes in genetic counselling: an empirical study. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 60: 40–7Google Scholar

Michie, S., Marteau, T. M., Bobrow, M. 1997b. Genetic counselling: the psychological impact of meeting patients' expectations. J. Med. Genet. 34: 237–41Google Scholar

Modell, B., Kuliev, A. M. 1991. Services for thalassemia as a model for cost–benefit analysis of genetic services. J. Inherit. Metabol. Dis. 14: 640–51Google Scholar

Molenaar, J. C. 1992. A Report from the Netherlands. The legal investigation of a decision not to operate on an infant with Down's syndrome and duodenal atresia. Bioethics 6: 35–40Google Scholar

Munthe, C. 1996. The Moral Roots of Prenatal Diagnosis. Studies in Research Ethics No 7. Göteborg: The Royal Society of Arts and Sciences in Gotherburg, Centre for Research Ethics

Murphy, T. F. 1985. The moral significance of spontaneous abortion. J. Med. Ethics 11: 79–83Google Scholar

Murray, J., Cuckle, H., Taylor, G., Hewison, J. 1997. Screening for fragile X syndrome: information needs for health planners. J. Med. Screening 4: 60–94Google Scholar

Musschenga, A. W. 1997. The relation between concepts of quality-of-life, health and happiness. J. Med. Philos. 22: 11–28Google Scholar

Nature 1991. Editorial: Ethics and the human genome. 351: 591

Nat. Genet. 1997. Editorial: Brave new now. 15: 1–2

Nelkin, D., Lindee, M. S. 1995. The DNA Mystique. The Gene as a Cultural Icon. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company

Nelkin, D., Tancredi, L. 1995. Health screening and testing in the public-health context. In: Reich, W. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Bioethics, pp. 1129–32. New York: Macmillan

Nesse, R. M., Williams, G. C. 1994. Why We Get Sick. The New Science of Darwinian Medicine. New York: Times Books, Random House

Nicholson, A., Alberman, E. 1992. Cerebral palsy – an increasing contributor to severe mental retardation?Arch. Dis. Child. 67: 1050–5Google Scholar

Nielsen, B. B., Liljestrand, J., Hedegaard, M., Thilsted, S. H., Joseph, A. 1997. Reproductive pattern, perinatal mortality, and sex preference in rural Tamil Nadu, south India: community based, cross sectional study. Br. Med. J. 314: 1521–4Google Scholar

Noddings, N. 1984. Caring. A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press

Nordenfelt, L. 1987. On the Nature of Health. An Action – Theoretic Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel

Palo, J. 1995. Ei ihan tavalliset ihmiset. Helsingin Sanomat Kuukausiliite 25: 46–50 (Not just ordinary people. In Finnish)Google Scholar

Palomaki, G. E. 1994. Population based prenatal screening for the fragile X syndrome. J. Med. Screen. 1: 65–72Google Scholar

Palomaki, G. E., Haddow, J. E. 1996. Is it time for population-based prenatal screening for fragile-X?. Lancet 341: 373–4Google Scholar

Parens, E. 1996. Taking behavioral genetics seriously. Hastings Cent. Rep. 26(4): 13–22Google Scholar

Parfit, D. 1976. Rights, interests and possible people. In: Gorovitz, S. et al. (Eds) Moral Problems in Medicine, pp. 369–75. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall

Parsons, E. 1997. Culture and genetics: is genetics in society or society in genetics? In: Clarke, A., Parsons, E. (Eds) Culture, Kinship and Genes. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan

Parsons, E., Bradley, D. 1994. Ethical issues in newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. In: Clarke, A. (Ed.) Genetic Counselling. Practice and Principles, pp. 95–112. London: Routledge

Pauker, S. P., Pauker, S. G. 1994. Prenatal diagnosis – why is 35 a magical number?. New Engl. J. Med. 330: 1151–2Google Scholar

Payer, L. 1990. Medicine and Culture. London: Victor Gollancz

Peippo, M. 1995. FraX-oireyhtymän perinnöllisyys. In: Arvio, M., Laine, P. (Eds) FraX-oireyhtymä pojalla ja miehellä. Pääjärven kuntayhtymän tutkimusraportti, pp. 6–13. (Heritability of FraX syndrome. In Finnish)

Powledge, T., Fletcher, J. 1979. Guidelines for the ethical, social and legal issues in prenatal diagnosis. New Engl. J. Med. 300: 168–72Google Scholar

Press, N. A., Browner, C. H. 1994. Collective silences, collective fictions: how prenatal diagnostic testing became part of routine prenatal care. In: Rothenberg, K. H., Thomsen, E. J. (Eds) Women and Prenatal Testing, pp. 201–18. Columbus: Ohio State University Press

Press, N. A., Browner, C. H. 1997. Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis. Soc. Sci. Med. 45: 979–89Google Scholar

Pueschel, S. M., 1990. Clinical aspects of Down syndrome from infancy to adulthood. Am. J. Med. Genet. Suppl. 7: 52–6Google Scholar

Puskala, R. M. 1995. In: Reinikka–Tevalin, R. (Ed.) Sikiödiagnostiikka – näkökulmia, pp. 40–3. Tampere: Kehitysvammaisten tulikiiton IKI – instituntti. (Fetal diagnosis – points of view. In Finnish)

Qureshi, N. 1997. The relevance of cultural understanding to clinical genetic practice. In: Clarke, A., Parsons, E. (Eds) Culture, Kinship and Genes, pp. 111–19. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan

Rantakallio, P., Wendt, L. 1986. Mental retardation and subnormality in a birth cohort of 12000 children in Northern Finland. Am. J. Ment. Defic. 90: 380–7Google Scholar

Rapp, R. 1994. Women's responses to prenatal diagnosis: a sociocultural perspective on diversity. In: Rothenberg, K. H., Thomson, E. J. (Eds) Women and Prenatal Testing, pp. 219–33. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press

Reid, M. 1991. The diffusion of four prenatal screening tests across Europe. London: King's Fund Centre for Health Services Development

Richardson, M. K., Reiss, M. J. 1999. What does the human embryo look like, and does it matter?Lancet 354: 244–6Google Scholar

Richardson, S. A., Koller, H. 1985. Epidemiology. In: Clarke, A. M., Clarke, D. B., Berg, J. M. (Eds) Mental Deficiency: The Changing Outlook, pp. 356–400. Cambridge: Methuen and Co

Rose, G. 1992. The Strategy of Preventive Medicine. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Rose, S. 1995. The rise of neurogenetic determinism. Nature 373: 380–2Google Scholar

Rose-Ackerman, S. 1982. Mental retardation and society: The ethics and politics of normalization. Ethics 93: 81–101Google Scholar

Rosen, M., Clark, G. R., Kivitz, M. S. (Eds) 1976. The History of Mental Retardation. Collected Papers. Baltimore: University Park Press

Rothman, B. K. 1994. The tentative pregnancy: then and now. In: Rothenberg, K. H., Thomson, E. J. (Eds) Women and Prenatal Testing, pp. 260–70. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press

Rowley, P. T., Loader, S., Sutera, C. J., Walden, M. 1989. Do pregnant women benefit form hemoglobinopathy carrier detection?Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 565: 152–60Google Scholar

Santalahti, P., Hemminki, E. 1998. Use of prenatal screening tests in Finland. Eur. J. Public Health 8: 8–14Google Scholar

Santalahti, P., Latikka, A. M., Ryynänen, M., Hemminki, E. 1996. Women's experiences of prenatal serum screening. Birth 23: 101–7Google Scholar

Santalahti, P., Hemminki, E., Latikka, A. M., Ryynänen, M. 1998. Women's decision-making in prenatal screening. Soc. Sci. Med. 46: 1067–76Google Scholar

Schalock, R. L. 1996. Reconsidering the conceptualization and measurement of quality of life. In: Schalock, R. L., Siperstein, G. N. (Eds) Quality of Life Volume I. Conceptualization and Measurement, pp. vii–xi. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation

Siperstein, G. N. (Eds) 1996. Quality of Life Volume I. Conceptualization and Measurement. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation

Siperstein, G. N. (Eds) 1997. Quality of Life Volume II. Application to Persons with Disabilities. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation

Schwartz, K. 1976. Nature's corrective principle in social evolution. Original 1908, reprinted in Rosen, M., Clark, G. R., Kivitz, M. S. (Eds) 1976. The History of Mental Retardation. Collected Papers, vol. 2, pp. 147–63. Baltimore: University Park Press

Schwartz, R. 1996. Genetic knowledge: Some legal and ethical questions. In: Thomasma, D. C., Kushner, T. (Eds) Birth to Death. Science and Bioethics, pp. 21–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Sen, A. 1993. Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum, M. C., Sen, A. (Eds) The Quality of Life, pp. 30–53. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Serra-Prat, M., Gallo, P., Jovell, A. J., Aymerich, M., Estrada, M. D. 1998. Trade-offs in prenatal detection of Down syndrome. Am. J. Public Health 88: 551–7Google Scholar

Sheldon, T. 1999. Dutch doctors call for all pregnant women to be screened for Down's. Br. Med. J. 319: 872Google Scholar

Shepperdson, B. 1983. Abortion and euthanasia of Down's syndrome children – the parents' view. J. Med. Ethics 9: 152–7Google Scholar

Simola, K. 1995. Sikiötutkimukset – mitä, kenelle ja miksi? In: Reinikka-Tevalin, R. Sikiödiagnostiikka – näkökulmia, pp. 7–13. Tampere: Kehitysvammaisten tulikiiton IKI-instituutti. (Fetal investigations – what, to whom and why? In Finnish)

Simpson, J. L. 1991. Screening for fetal and genetic abnormalities. Baillière's Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 5: 675–96Google Scholar

Singer, P. 1993. Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Sjögren, B., Uddenberg, N. 1988. Decision making during the prenatal diagnostic procedure. A questionnaire and interview study of 211 women participating in prenatal diagnosis. Prenat. Diagn. 8: 263–73Google Scholar

Skeels, H. M., Dye, H. B. 1976. A study of the effects of differential stimulation on mentally retarded children. Original 1939, reprinted in Rosen, M., Clark, G. R., Kivitz, M. S. (Eds) The History of Mental Retardation. Collected Papers, vol. 2, pp. 241–66. Baltimore: University Park Press

Smith, D. K., Shaw, R. W., Marteau, T. M. 1994. Informed consent to undergo screening for Down's syndrome: the gap between policy and practice. Br. Med. J. 309: 776Google Scholar

Somer, M., Mustonen, H., Norio, R. 1988. Evaluation of genetic counseling: Recall of information, post-counseling reproduction, and attitude of the counsellees. Clin. Genet. 34: 352–65Google Scholar

Spallone, P. 1997. ‘Once you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail’. In: Clarke, A., Parsons, E. (Eds) Culture, Kinship and Genes, pp. 197–205. Basingstoke: Macmillan

Sternberg, R. J. 1990. Metaphors of Mind – Conceptions of the Nature of Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Strauss, D., Eyman, R. K., Grossman, H. J. 1996. Predictors of mortality in children with severe mental retardation: the effect of placement. Am. J. Public Health 86: 1422–9Google Scholar

Sutton, A. 1990. Prenatal Diagnosis: Confronting the Ethical Issues. London: The Linacre Centre

Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R. 1996. Quality of life and the individual's perspective. In: Schalock, R. L., Siperstein, G. N. (Eds) Quality of Life Volume I. Conceptualization and Measurement, pp. 11–22. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation

The Danish Council of Ethics. 1993. Ethics and Mapping of the Human Genome. Copenhagen: Danish Council of Ethics

Tooley, M. 1972. Abortion and infanticide. Philos. Public Affairs 2: 37–65Google Scholar

Vácha, J. 1982. The problem of so-called normality in anthropological sciences. Modern Man, Anthropos (Brno) 22: 73–85Google Scholar

Vanhatalo, S. 1999. Sikiön kipu – totta vai yliempaattista kuvittelua?Duodecim 115: 1458–63. (Foetal pain – true or imagination? In Finnish)Google Scholar

Vehmas, S. 1999a. Discriminative assumptions of utilitarian bioethics regarding individuals with intellectual disabilities. Disabil. Soc. 14: 37–52Google Scholar

Vehmas, S. 1999b. Newborn infants and the moral significance of intellectual disabilities. J. Assoc. Persons Sev. Handicaps 24: 111–21Google Scholar

Virkkula, S. 1998. Karsi vammaisia, karsit kuluja. Aamulehti 26. 4. 1998: 17–18 (Less disabled, less costs. In Finnish)Google Scholar

Wald, N. J., Kennard, A., Hackshaw, A., McGuire, A. 1997. Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome. J. Med. Screen. 4: 181–246Google Scholar

Warren, M. A. 1997. Moral Status. Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Watson, E., Mayall, E., Chapple, J.et al. 1991. Carrier screening for cystic fibrosis. Br. Med. J. 303: 405–7Google Scholar

Watson, J. 1997–1998. Good gene, bad gene. What is the right way to fight the tragedy of genetic disease?Time, Special issue, Winter: 86Google Scholar

Welie, J. V. M. 1998. In the Face of Suffering. The Philosophical-Anthropological Foundations of Clinical Ethics. Omaha: Creighton University Press

Wertz, D. 1997. Reconsidering ‘nondirectiveness’ in genetic counseling. Gene Letter 1, Issue 4 (http://www.geneletter.org/0197/counseling.htm)Google Scholar

Wertz, D., Fletcher, J. C. 1988. Attitude of genetic counselors: a multinational survey. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 42: 592–600Google Scholar

White, M. T. 1998. Decision-making through dialogue: reconfiguring autonomy in genetic counseling. Theoret. Med. Bioethics 19: 5–19Google Scholar

White, M. T. 1999. Making responsible decisions. An interpretive ethic for genetic decision making. Hastings Cent. Rep. 29: 14–21Google Scholar

Whitten, C. F. 1973. Sickle-cell programming – an imperiled promise. New Engl. J. Med. 288: 318–19Google Scholar

Wickelgren, I. 1999. Nurture helps mold able minds. Science 283: 1832–4Google Scholar

Wilska, M. 2001. Aina syntyy lapsia, joiden vammaisuus tulee yllätyksenä. Helsingin Sanomat. (There will always be children whose disability will be a surprise. In Finnish)

Wolraich, M. L., Siperstein, G. N., Reed, D. 1991. Doctors' decisions and prognostications for infants with Down syndrome. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 33: 336–42Google Scholar

World Health Organization 1980. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva: WHO

Wulff, H., Andur Pedersen, S., Rosenberg, R. 1986. Philosophy of Medicine – An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell

Zigler, E., Balla, D., Hodapp, R. 1984. On the definition and classification of mental retardation. Am. J. Ment. Defic. 89: 215–30Google Scholar