Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Prologue: Hilbert's last problem
- 1 Introduction
- PART I PROOF SYSTEMS BASED ON NATURAL DEDUCTION
- PART II PROOF SYSTEMS BASED ON SEQUENT CALCULUS
- PART III PROOF SYSTEMS FOR GEOMETRIC THEORIES
- PART IV PROOF SYSTEMS FOR NON-CLASSICAL LOGICS
- Bibliography
- Index of names
- Index of subjects
1 - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 October 2011
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Prologue: Hilbert's last problem
- 1 Introduction
- PART I PROOF SYSTEMS BASED ON NATURAL DEDUCTION
- PART II PROOF SYSTEMS BASED ON SEQUENT CALCULUS
- PART III PROOF SYSTEMS FOR GEOMETRIC THEORIES
- PART IV PROOF SYSTEMS FOR NON-CLASSICAL LOGICS
- Bibliography
- Index of names
- Index of subjects
Summary
We shall discuss the notion of proof and then present an introductory example of the analysis of the structure of proofs. The contents of the book are outlined in the third and last section of this chapter.
The idea of a proof
A proof in logic and mathematics is, traditionally, a deductive argument from some given assumptions to a conclusion. Proofs are meant to present conclusive evidence in the sense that the truth of the conclusion should follow necessarily from the truth of the assumptions. Proofs must be, in principle, communicable in every detail, so that their correctness can be checked. Detailed proofs are a means of presentation that need not follow in anyway the steps in finding things out. Still, it would be useful if there was a natural way from the latter steps to a proof, and equally useful if proofs also suggested the way the truths behind them were discovered.
The presentation of proofs as deductive arguments began in ancient Greek axiomatic geometry. It took Gottlob Frege in 1879 to realize that mere axioms and definitions are not enough, but that also the logical steps that combine axioms into a proof have to be made, and indeed can be made, explicit. To this purpose, Frege formulated logic itself as an axiomatic discipline, completed with just two rules of inference for combining logical axioms.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Proof AnalysisA Contribution to Hilbert's Last Problem, pp. 3 - 14Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
- 1
- Cited by