Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:42:49.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 16 - Behavioral approaches

from Section 3 - Interventions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

Colin Hemmings
Affiliation:
Albion Place Medical Centre
Nick Bouras
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brosnan, J. and Healy, O. (2011). A review of behavioural interventions for the treatment of aggression in individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 437446.Google Scholar
Cannella, H.I., O’Reilly, M.F., Lancioni, G.E. (2005). Choice and preference assessment research with people with severe to profound developmental disabilities: a review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 115.Google Scholar
Carr, E.G., Ladd, M.V., Schulte, C.F. (2008). Validation of the Contextual Assessment Inventory for problem behaviour. Journal of Positive Behaviour Interventions, 10, 91104.Google Scholar
Carr, J.W., Severtson, J.M., Lepper, T.L. (2009). Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behaviour exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 2257.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, M. and Benson, B.A. (2011). Use of differential reinforcement to reduce behaviour problems in adults with intellectual disabilities: a methodological review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 383394.Google Scholar
Denis, J., Van den Noortgate, W., Maes, B. (2011). Self-injurious behaviour in people with profound intellectual disabilities: a meta-analysis of single-case studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 911923.Google Scholar
Durand, V.M. and Crimmins, D.B. (1988). Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behaviour. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 99117.Google Scholar
Emerson, E., Robertson, J., Gregory, N., Hatton, C., Kessissoglou, S. (2000). Treatment and management of challenging behaviours in residential settings. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 13, 197215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskin, C.J., McVilly, K.R., McGillivray, J.A. (2013). Initiatives to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint on people with developmental disabilities: a systematic review and quantitative synthesis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 39463961.Google Scholar
Hagopian, L.P., Rooker, G.W., Rolider, N.U. (2011). Identifying empirically supported treatments for pica in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 21142120.Google Scholar
Hagopian, L.P. Rooker, G.W., Jessel, J., DeLeon, I.G. (2013). Initial functional analysis outcomes and modifications in pursuit of differentiation: a summary of 176 inpatient cases. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 46, 88100.Google Scholar
Harvey, S.T., Boer, D., Meyer, L.H., Evans, I.M. (2009). Updating a meta-analysis of intervention research with challenging behaviour: treatment validity and standards of practice. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 34, 6780.Google Scholar
Hassiotis, A., Robotham, D., Canagasabey, A., et al. (2009). Randomized, single-blind, controlled trial of a specialist behaviour therapy team for challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 12781285.Google Scholar
Hassiotis, A., Canagasabey, A., Robotham, D., et al. (2011). Applied behaviour analysis and standard treatment in intellectual disability: two-year outcomes. British Journal of Psychiatry, 198, 490491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwata, B.A., Dorsey, M.F., Slifer, K.J., Bauman, K.E., Richman, G.S. (1994). Towards a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 27, 197209.Google Scholar
Iwata, B.A., Rolider, N.U., Dozier, C.L. (2009). Evaluation of timeout programmes through phased withdrawal. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 203209.Google Scholar
Jennett, H.K. and Hagopian, L.P. (2008). Identifying empirically supported treatments for phobic avoidance in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Behaviour Therapy, 39, 151161.Google Scholar
Kurtz, P.F., Boelter, E.W., Jarmolowicz, D.P., Chin, M.D., Hagopian, L.P. (2011). An analysis of functional communication training as an empirically supported treatment for problem behaviour displayed by individuals with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 29352942.Google Scholar
Lambert, J.M., Bloom, S.E., Clay, C.J., Kunnavatana, S.S., Collins, S.D. (2014). Training residential staff and supervisors to conduct traditional functional analyses. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 17571765.Google Scholar
Lanovaz, M.J., Argumedes, M., Roy, D., Duquette, J.R., Watkins, N. (2013). Using ABC narrative recording to identify the function of problem behaviour: a pilot study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 27342742.Google Scholar
Luiselli, J.K. (2009). Physical restraint of people with intellectual disability: a review of implementation reduction and elimination procedures. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 126134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matson, J.L. (1982). The treatment of behavioural characteristics of depression in the mentally retarded. Behaviour Therapy, 13, 209218.Google Scholar
Matson, J.L. and Boisjoli, J.A. (2009). Restraint procedures and challenging behaviours in intellectual disability: an analysis of causative factors. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 111117.Google Scholar
Matson, J.L., Bamburg, J.W., Cherry, K.E., Paclawsky, T.R. (1999). A validity study on the Questions About Behavioural Function (QABF) scale: predicting treatment success for self-injury, aggression, and stereotypies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20, 163175.Google Scholar
Matson, J.L., Cooper, C., Malone, C.J., Moskow, S.L. (2008). The relationship of self-injurious behaviour and other maladaptive behaviours among individuals with severe and profound intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 29, 141148.Google Scholar
Matson, J.L., Kozlowski, A.M., Worley, J.A., et al. (2011). What is the evidence for environmental causes of challenging behaviours in persons with intellectual disabilities and autism spectrum disorders? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 693698.Google Scholar
Matson, J.L., Neal, D., Kozlowski, A.M. (2012). Treatment for the challenging behaviours of adults with intellectual disabilities. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 57, 587592.Google Scholar
Matson, J.L., Hattier, M.A., Belva, B., Matson, M.L. (2013). Pica in persons with developmental disabilities: approaches to treatment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 25642571.Google Scholar
McClean, B. and Grey, I. (2012). A component analysis of positive behaviour support plans. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 37, 221231.Google Scholar
Murphy, G.H., Beadle-Brown, J., Wing, L., et al. (2005). Chronicity of challenging behaviours in people with severe intellectual disabilities and/or autism: a total population sample. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 35, 405418.Google Scholar
Oliver, P.C., Piachaud, J., Done, J., et al. (2002). Difficulties in conducting a randomized controlled trial of health service interventions in intellectual disability: implications for evidence-based practice. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 46, 340345.Google Scholar
Poppes, P., Van der Putten, A.A.J., Vlaskamp, C. (2014). Addressing challenging behaviour in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: analyzing the effects of daily practice. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 11, 128136.Google Scholar
Rojahn, J., Zaja, R., Turygin, N., Moore, L., van Ingen, D.J. (2012). Functions of maladaptive behaviour in intellectual and developmental disabilities: behaviour categories and topographies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 20202027.Google Scholar
Rush, A.J. and Frances, A. (eds.) (2000). The Expert Consensus Guideline Series. Treatment of psychiatric and behavioral problems in mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105 (Issue 3, Special Issue), 156228.Google Scholar
Smith, C.M., Smith, R.G., Dracobly, J.D., Pace, A.P. (2012). Multiple-respondent anecdotal assessment: an analysis of interrater agreement and correspondence with analogue assessment outcomes. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 45, 779795.Google Scholar
Sturmey, P. (2012). Treatment of psychopathology in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 57, 593600.Google Scholar
Tiger, J., Hanley, G.P., Bruzek, J. (2008). Functional communication training: a review and practical guide. Behaviour Analysis in Practice, 1, 1623.Google Scholar
Tiger, J., Fisher, W.W., Toussaint, K.A., Kodak, T. (2009). Progressing from initially ambiguous functional analyses: three case examples. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 910926.Google Scholar
Travis, R. and Sturmey, P. (2008). A review of behavioural interventions for psychotic verbal behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 1, 1933.Google Scholar
Watkins, N. and Rapp, J.T. (2014). Environmental enrichment and response cost: immediate and subsequent effects on stereotypy. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 47, 186191.Google Scholar
Whitaker, S., Walker, T., McNally, C. (2004). The use of time base lag sequential analysis to look at the relationship between environmental events and challenging behaviour in people with learning disabilities. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 32, 6776.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×