Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:16:09.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Multidisciplinary teams within PICUs/LSUs

from Part III - Management of the Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit/Low Secure Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2009

M. Dominic Beer
Affiliation:
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Stephen M. Pereira
Affiliation:
Goodmayes Hospital, Essex
Carol Paton
Affiliation:
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Andy Johnston
Affiliation:
Hospital Manager, RMN Huntercombe Hospital, Roehampton, London, UK
Stephen Dye
Affiliation:
Consultant Psychiatrist Kimble PICU, Haleacre Unit Oxfordshire & BuckinghamshireMental Health, Partnership NHS Trust, Amersham Hospital, Amersham, Bucks, UK
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Multiprofessional working is essential within health care environments. Successive legislation in the UK (Department of Health and Social Security 1977; Department of Health 1990, 1999, 2000, 2001) and, more significantly for the purposes of this book, the National Minimum Standards for Psychiatric Intensive Care (Department of Health 2002) have attempted to outline methods of both implementing and positively running these interactions. Despite this, the development of high-quality and well functioning teams remains a continuing goal.

This chapter outlines the developmental history of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) principle within the UK, discusses some potential problems, elaborates on what makes a successful team and why working within a truly MDT is beneficial within a Psychiatric Intensive Care/Low Secure Unit (PICU/LSU). It also describes roles within the team and finally how teams can remain effective.

Definition of a multidisciplinary team

Mohrman et al. (1995) define a team as, ‘a group of individuals who work together to produce products or deliver services for which they are mutually accountable. Team members share goals and are mutually held accountable for meeting them, they are interdependent in their accomplishment, and they affect the results through their interactions with one another. Because the team is held collectively accountable, the work of integrating with one another is included among the responsibilities of each member’.

There is no one definition of an MDT and formal definitions in the wider literature do not accurately describe those recognised as mental health teams.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blanchard, K. 2001 High Five. New York: Harper Collins
Borrill, C, West, M, Shapiro, D, Rees, A. 2000 Team working and effectiveness in health care. Br J Health Care Manage 6(8): 364–371Google Scholar
Chalk, A. 1999 Community mental health teams: reviewing the debate. Ment Health Nurs 19: 12–14Google Scholar
Couchmann, W. 1995 Joint education for mental health teams. Nurs Stand 10: 32–34Google Scholar
Department of Health. 1975 Better Services for the Mentally Ill. London: HMSO
Department of Health. 1990 NHS and Community Care Act. London: HMSO
Department of Health. 1995. Buiding Bridges: A Guide to Arrangements for Inter-Agency Working for the Care and Protection of Severely Mentally Ill People. London: HMSO
Department of Health. 1999 National Service Framework for Mental Health: Modern Standards and Service Models. London: HMSO
Department of Health. 2000 The NHS Plan – A Plan for Investment. A Plan for Reform. London: HMSO
Department of Health. 2001 Health and Social Care Act. London: The Stationery Office
Department of Health. 2002 National Minimum Standards for General Adult Services in Psychiatric Intensive Care Units (PICU) and Low Secure Environments. London: Department of Health Publications
Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS). 1977 The National Health Service Act. London: HMSO
Department of Health and Social Security. 1981 Care in the Community: a consultative document on moving resources for care in England. London: DHSS
Department of Health and Social Security. 1988 Report of the committee of inquiry into the care and after-care of Miss Sharon Campbell. London: DHSS (Cm 440)
Ford, K, Farrington, A. 1999 Risk assessment. Assessing dangerousness in regional secure units – decision making in the multidisciplinary team. Ment Health Care 2(6): 201–204Google Scholar
Fried, BJ. 1989 Power acquisition in a health care setting – an application of strategic contingency theory. Hum Relat 41: 915–927Google Scholar
Galvin, SW, McCarthy, S. 1994 Multi-disciplinary community teams: clinging to the wreckage. J Ment Health 3: 157–166Google Scholar
Gibb, CE, Morrow, M, Clarke, CL, Cook, G, Gerting, P, Ramprogus, V. 2002 Transdisciplinary working: evaluating the development of health and social care provision in mental health. J Ment Health 11(3): 339–350Google Scholar
Harrison, P. 1990 Multidisciplinary teams and how to survive them. Occasional paper for Community and Rehabilitation Section. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists
Hutchison M. 2000 Issues around empowerment. In: Basset T (ed) Looking to the Future: Key Issues for Contemporary Mental Health Services. Brighton: Pavillion Publishing/Mental Health Foundation
Kielhofner, G. 2002 The Model of Human Occupation. Theory and Application. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Kitson, A. 1985 Education for quality. Senior Nurse 3(4): 11–16Google Scholar
Laidler P. 1994 Stroke Rehabilitation: Structure and Strategy. London: Chapman and Hall
Lucas J. 1996 Multidisciplinary care in the community for clients with mental health problems: guidelines for the future. In: Watkins, M, Hervey, N, Carson, J, Ritter, S (eds) Collaborative Community Mental Health Care. London: Arnold, pp. 351–370
Martin P. 1995 Nurse–patient relationship. In: Martin P (ed) Psychiatric Nursing. Harrow: Scutari, pp. 271–281
Michalon, M, Richman, A. 1990 Factors affecting length of stay in a psychiatric intensive care unit. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 12(5): 303–308Google Scholar
Miller, C, Freeman, M, Ross, N. 2001 Interprofessional Practice in Health Social Care. London: Arnold
Mohrman SA, Cohen SG, Morhrman AM. 1995 Designing Team-Based Organisations. San Francisco: Josey Bass
Norman, IJ, Peck, E. 1999 Working together in adult community mental health services: an inter-professional dialogue. J Ment Health 8(3): 217–230Google Scholar
Onyett, S. 2003 Teamworking in Mental Health. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan
Onyett, SR, Heppleston, T, Bushnell, D. 1994 A national survey of community mental health teams. J Ment Health 3: 175–194Google Scholar
Onyett, S, Pillinger, T, Muijen, M. 1997 Job satisfaction and burnout among members of community mental health teams. J Ment Health 6: 55–66Google Scholar
Opie, A. 1997 Thinking teams thinking clients; issues of discourse and representation in the work of health care teams. Sociol Health Illn 19(3): 259–280Google Scholar
Ovretveit, J. 1993 Coordinating Community Care: Multidisciplinary Teams and Care Management. Buckingham: Open University Press
Ovretveit, J. 1995 Team decision making. J Interprofess Care 9: 41–51Google Scholar
Ovretveit, J. 1996 Five ways to describe a multidisciplinary team. J Interprofess Care 10: 163–171Google Scholar
Peck, E, Norman, IJ. 1999 Working together in adult community mental health services: exploring inter-professional role relations. J Ment Health 8(3): 231–242Google Scholar
Richards, A, Rees, A. 1998 Developing criteria to measure the effectiveness of community mental health teams. Ment Health Care 21(1): 14–17Google Scholar
Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health. 1997 Pulling Together. The Future Role and Training of Mental Health Staff. London: SCMH
Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health. 2001 The Capable Practitioner. London: SCMH
Test MA, Marks IM. 1990 Commentary on Chapter 17. In: Marks IM, Scott RA (eds) Mental Health Care Delivery: Innovations, Impediments and Implementation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 254–256
Watson, GB. 1994 Multi-disciplinary working and co-operation in community care. Ment Health Nurs 14: 18–21Google Scholar
West MA. 1996 Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: a conceptual integration. In: West MA (ed) Handbook of Work Group Psychology. Chichester: Wiley
While, A, Barriball, L. 1999 Qualified and unqualified nurses' view of the multidisciplinary team. J Interpersonal Care 13(1): 77–89Google Scholar
Whyte, L, Brooker, C. 2001 Working with a multidisciplinary team in secure psychiatric environments. J Psychosoc Nurs 39(9): 26–34Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×