Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:54:22.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Assemblage Diversity

from PART III - ARCHAEOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO DATA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2017

David L. Carlson
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Get access

Summary

Archaeological assemblages are collections of artifacts that have been assigned to different groups. The boundaries defining an assemblage can be a whole site, the part of the site excavated, a feature within a site (e.g., pit, grave, house), or an arbitrary unit defined in terms of horizontal and vertical space (Level 7 of unit N302E200). A description of an assemblage includes how its boundaries are defined and how many of each kind of archaeological material was present within those boundaries.

One of the challenges in analyzing archaeological assemblages is that the factors that control the counts are usually not controlled by the archaeologist. The boundaries of the assemblage usually do not represent a consistent amount of time from one assemblage to another. It does not matter if time is measured in years or person-years, we cannot assume that the amount of time is the same between assemblages except in rare circumstances such as graves and shipwrecks. Artifact composition, whether the result of a geological event (obsidian) or a behavioral event (ceramics) does not include the same level of uncertainty. Artifact composition is expressed using some similar measure that standardizes abundance (e.g., percent, per mil, ppm, ppb). Artifact assemblages may be similarly standardized in terms of percentage of the whole assemblage or only those items under analysis (e.g., ceramics, but not lithics; faunal material, but not botanical material; lithic artifacts, but not lithic debitage) or in terms of density (items per volume), but usually we are not certain that volume means the same thing across the various assemblages under consideration.

This means the analysis of artifact assemblages is similar, but different from artifact composition and from species composition in ecological communities. While it makes sense to borrow from the approaches used by both, it is important to recognize the differences. In comparison with ecological communities, artifact types are less clear-cut than species. The assemblage represents an accumulation of discarded material rather than the observation of living individuals present at a particular point in time and in that sense archaeological assemblages are more similar to fossil communities. Instead of the niches occupied by biological species, artifacts occupy space defined by human interaction with the physical environment and with social networks.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Assemblage Diversity
  • David L. Carlson, Texas A & M University
  • Book: Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Using R
  • Online publication: 22 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139628730.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Assemblage Diversity
  • David L. Carlson, Texas A & M University
  • Book: Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Using R
  • Online publication: 22 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139628730.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Assemblage Diversity
  • David L. Carlson, Texas A & M University
  • Book: Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Using R
  • Online publication: 22 July 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139628730.018
Available formats
×