Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T18:02:02.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Case studies: Lithology and pore-fluid prediction from seismic data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2010

Per Avseth
Affiliation:
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, and Odin Petroleum, Bergen
Tapan Mukerji
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Gary Mavko
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

The path of precept is long, that of example short and effectual.

Seneca

The case study examples in this chapter make use of the techniques described in the previous chapters, to estimate the uncertainty and map the probability of occurrence of different facies and fluids away from the well locations by combining attributes from seismic analyses with statistical rock physics.

The first case study uses pre-stack seismic amplitude analyses to delineate reservoir zones in the North Sea. In the second study, again in the North Sea, use is made of seismic impedance inversions, statistical rock physics, and geostatistics to characterize the reservoir by mapping probabilities of occurrence of facies and fluids. In the third case study we show how we can combine statistical rock physics, lithofacies interpretation, and AVO analysis to discriminate between lithologies and thereby improve detectability of hydrocarbons from seismic amplitudes in Grane field, North Sea. The fourth study, from West Africa, shows an example of using seismic amplitude analyses and depth trends in rock properties to classify hydrocarbon zones at different depths. The fifth case study is an example of the full workflow of rock physics template (RPT) analysis, starting with the selection of the most appropriate RPT using well-log cross-plot analysis followed by rock physics interpretation of elastic inversion results using the selected template. The example is from the Grane field in the North Sea, the same field as for case study 3.

Type
Chapter
Information
Quantitative Seismic Interpretation
Applying Rock Physics Tools to Reduce Interpretation Risk
, pp. 258 - 316
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×