Graphene quantum dots: transport experiments and local imaging

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511998331.018

17 - Graphene quantum dots: transport experiments and local imaging

from Part V - Electron transport in quantum dots fabricated by lithographic techniques from III–V semiconductors and graphene

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2012

S. Schnez ,

J. Guettinger ,

F. Molitor ,

C. Stampfer ,

M. Huefner ,

T. Ihn and

K. Ensslin

Edited by

Alexander Tartakovskii

Show author details

S. Schnez: Affiliation:
Solid State Physics Laboratory, Switzerland
J. Guettinger: Affiliation:
Solid State Physics Laboratory, Switzerland
F. Molitor: Affiliation:
Solid State Physics Laboratory, Switzerland
C. Stampfer: Affiliation:
Solid State Physics Laboratory, Switzerland
M. Huefner: Affiliation:
Solid State Physics Laboratory, Switzerland
T. Ihn: Affiliation:
Solid State Physics Laboratory, Switzerland
K. Ensslin: Affiliation:
Solid State Physics Laboratory, Switzerland
Alexander Tartakovskii: Affiliation:
University of Sheffield

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

This chapter gives an overview of our recent experimental research on graphene quantum dots. We will focus on two aspects, namely transport experiments revealing the existence of excited states and how they can be used to detect the electron–hole crossover and scanninggate microscopy to reveal local information on localized states.

One of the extraordinary properties of carbon atoms is the ability to be synthesized into solid structures of any dimensionality: three-dimensional graphite and diamond, one-dimensional carbon nanotubes, and zero-dimensional fullerenes. Graphene, a twodimensional carbon allotrope, was the last to be added to this list in 2004, when K. Novoselov et al. published their results [32]. Graphene has been stimulating the physicists' imagination since then: remarkable mechanical and electronic properties make it a promising candidate for future technological advances and breakthroughs in fundamental research [10]. In particular, the linear dispersion relation of graphene (for small energies) and an additional degree of freedom due to the valley degeneracy led to new physics not observed before in a condensed-matter environment. In fact, impressive results on the so-called unconventional quantum Hall effect [33, 55] and Klein tunneling [54] were obtained. The significance of the discovery of graphene and the first experiments were acknowledged and the discoverers of graphene were rewarded the Nobel Prize in physics 2010.

It was not obvious from the very beginning of graphene research whether it is easily possible to build more complex nanostructures like quantum point contacts or quantum dots (QDs).

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: Quantum Dots
Optics, Electron Transport and Future Applications
, pp. 296 - 316

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511998331.018 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] Beenakker, C. W. J. 1991. Theory of Coulomb-blockade oscillations in the conductance of a quantum dot. Phys. Rev.B, 44(4), 1646–1656.Google Scholar

[2] Berry, M. V. and Mondragon, R. J. 1987. Neutrino billiards: time-reversal symmetry-breaking without magnetic fields. Proc. R. Soc. Lond.A, 412(1842), 53–74.

[3] Chen, H.-Y., Apalkov, V. and Chakraborty, T. 2007a. Fock–Darwin states of dirac electrons in graphene-based artificial atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98(18), 186803.Google Scholar

[4] Chen, Z., Lin, Y.-M., Rooks, M. J., and Avouris, P. 2007b. Graphene nano-ribbon electronics. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 40(2), 228–232. International Symposium on Nanometer-Scale Quantum Physics.Google Scholar

[5] Darwin, C. G. 1930. The diamagnetism of the free electron. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 27(86).Google Scholar

[6] Deshpande, A., Bao, W., Miao, F., Lau, C. N. and LeRoy, B. J. 2009. Spatially resolved spectroscopy of monolayer graphene on SiO2. Phys. Rev.B, 79(20), 205411.Google Scholar

[7] Evaldsson, M., Zozoulenko, I. V., Xu, H. and Heinzel, T. 2008. Edge-disorder-induced Anderson localization and conduction gap in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev.B, 78(16), 161407.Google Scholar

[8] Fock, V. 1928. Bemerkung zur Quantelung des harmonischen Oszillators im Magnetfeld. Z. Physik, 47, 446.Google Scholar

[9] Gallagher, P.Todd, K. and Goldhaber-Gordon, D. 2010. Disorder-induced gap behavior in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev.B, 81(11), 115409.Google Scholar

[10] Geim, A. K., and Novoselov, K. S. 2007. The rise of graphene. Nat Mater, 6(3), 183–191.Google Scholar

[11] Gildemeister, A. E., Ihn, T., Barengo, C., Studerus, P. and Ensslin, K. 2007. Construction of a dilution refrigerator cooled scanning force microscope. Rev. of Sci. Instrum., 78(1), 013704–6.Google Scholar

[12] Graf, D., Molitor, F., Ensslin, K. et al. 2007. Spatially resolved Ramans pectroscopy of single- and few-layer graphene. Nano Lett., 7(2), 238–242.Google Scholar

[13] Guttinger, J., Stampfer, C., Hellmuller, S. et al. 2008. Charge detection in graphene quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett., 93(21), 212102.Google Scholar

[14] Guttinger, J., Stampfer, C., Libisch, F. et al. 2009. Electron–hole crossover in graphene quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett., 103(4), 046810.Google Scholar

[15] Güttinger, J., Frey, T., Stampfer, C., Ihn, T. and Ensslin, K. 2010. Spin states in graphene quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105(11), 116801.Google Scholar

[16] Han, M. Y., Özyilmaz, B., Zhang, Y. and Kim, P. 2007. Energy band-gap engineering of graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98(20), 206805.Google Scholar

[17] Han, M. Y., Brant, J. C. and Kim, P. 2010. Electron transport in disordered graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104(5), 056801.Google Scholar

[18] Ihn, T. 2010. Semiconductor Nanostructures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[19] Libisch, F., Rotter, S., Güttinger, J., Stampfer, C. and Burgdörfer, J. 2010. Transition to Landau levels in graphene quantum dots. Phys. Rev.B, 81(24), 245411.Google Scholar

[20] Libisch, F., Stampfer, C. and Burgdörfer, J. 2009. Graphene quantum dots: Beyond a Dirac billiard. Phys. Rev.B, 115423.

[21] Liu, R.-B., Yao, W. and Sham, L. J. 2010. Quantum computing by optical control of electrons pins. Advances Phys., 59(5), 703–802.Google Scholar

[22] Liu, X., Oostinga, J. B., Morpurgo, A. F. and Vandersypen, L. M. K. 2009. Electrostatic confinement of electrons in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev.B, 80(12), 121407.Google Scholar

[23] Loss, D. and DiVincenzo, D. P. 1998. Quantum computation with quantum dots. Phys. Rev.A, 57(1), 120–126.Google Scholar

[24] Martin, I. and Blanter, Y. M. 2009. Transport in disordered graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev.B, 79(23), 235132.Google Scholar

[25] Martin, J., Akerman, N., Ulbricht, G. et al. 2008. Observation of electron–hole puddles in graphene using a scanning single-electron transistor. Nat Phys, 4(2), 144–148.Google Scholar

[26] Molitor, F., Jacobsen, A., Stampfer, C. et al. 2009a. Transport gap in side-gated graphene constrictions. Phys. Rev.B, 79(7), 075426.Google Scholar

[27] Molitor, F., Dröscher, S., Güttinger, J. et al. 2009b. Transport through graphene double dots. Appl. Phys. Lett., 94(22), 222107.Google Scholar

[28] Molitor, F., Knowles, H., Dröscher, S. et al. 2010. Observation of excited states in a graphene double quantum dot. EPL (Europhysics Letters), 89(6), 67005.Google Scholar

[29] Mucciolo, E. R., Neto, A. H. C. and Lewenkopf, C. H. 2009. Conductance quantization and transport gaps in disordered graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev.B, 79(7), 075407.Google Scholar

[30] Nakada, K., Fujita, M., Dresselhaus, G. and Dresselhaus, M. S. 1996. Edge state in graphene ribbons: nanometer size effect and edge shape dependence. Phys. Rev.B, 54(24), 17 954–17 961.Google Scholar

[31] Nazarov, Y. V. and Blanter, Y. M. 2009. Quantum Transport: Introduction to Nanoscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[32] Novoselov, K. S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V. et al. 2004. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science, 306(5696), 666–669.Google Scholar

[33] Novoselov, K. S., McCann, E., Morozov, S. V. et al. 2006. Unconventional quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase of 2[pi] in bilayer graphene. Nat. Phys. 2(3), 177–180.Google Scholar

[34] Oostinga, J. B., Sacépé, B., Craciun, M. F. and Morpurgo, A. F. 2010. Magnetotransport t hrough graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev.B, 81(19), 193408.Google Scholar

[35] Ponomarenko, L. A., Schedin, F., Katsnelson, M. I. et al. 2008. Chaotic Dirac billiard in graphene quantum dots. Science, 320(5874), 356–358.Google Scholar

[36] Recher, P., Nilsson, J., Burkard, G. and Trauzettel, B. 2009. Bound states and magnetic field induced valley splitting in gate-tunable graphene quantum dots. Phys. Rev.B, 79(8), 085407.Google Scholar

[37] Ritter, K. A. and Lyding, J. W. 2009. The infiuence of edge structure on the electronic properties of graphene quantum dots and nanoribbons. Nat. Mater., 8(3), 235–242.Google Scholar

[38] Schnez, S., Ensslin, K., Sigrist, M. and Ihn, T. 2008. Analytic model of the energy spectrum of a graphene quantum dot in a perpendicular magnetic field. Phys. Rev.B, 78(19), 195427.Google Scholar

[39] Schnez, S., Molitor, F., Stampfer, C. et al. 2009. Observation of excited states in a graphene quantum dot. Appl. Phys. Lett., 94(1), 012107.Google Scholar

[40] Schnez, S. 2010. Transport Properties and Local Imaging of Graphene Quantum Dots. Ph.D. thesis, ETH Zurich.Google Scholar

[41] Schnez, S., Güttinger, J.Huefner, M. et al. 2010. Imaging localized states in graphene nanostructures. Phys. Rev.B, 82(16), 165445.Google Scholar

[42] Schubert, G., Schleede, J. and Fehske, H. 2009. Anderson disorder in graphene nanoribbons: a local distribution approach. Phys. Rev.B, 79(23), 235116.Google Scholar

[43] Semenoff, G. W. 1984. Condensed-matter simulation of a three-dimensional anomaly. Phys. Rev. Lett., 53(26), 2449–2452.Google Scholar

[44] Sols, F., Guinea, F. and Neto, A. H. 2007. Coulomb blockade in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99(16), 166803.Google Scholar

[45] Stampfer, C., Guttinger, J., Molitor, F. et al. 2008a. Tunable Coulomb blockade in nanostructured graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett., 92(1), 012102.Google Scholar

[46] Stampfer, C., Schurtenberger, E., Molitor, F. et al. 2008b. Tunable Graphene Single Electron Transistor. Nano Letters, 8(8), 2378–2383.Google Scholar

[47] Stampfer, C., Güttinger, J., Hellmüller, S. et al. 2009. Energy gaps in etched graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102(5), 056403.Google Scholar

[48] Tarucha, S., Austing, D. G., Honda, T., van der Hage, R. J. and Kouwenhoven, L. P. 1996. Shell filling and spin effects in a few electron quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett., 77(17), 3613–3616.Google Scholar

[49] Todd, K., Chou, H.-T., Amasha, S. and Goldhaber-Gordon, D. 2008. Quantum dot behavior in graphene nanoconstrictions. Nano Letters, 9(1), 416–421.Google Scholar

[50] Trauzettel, B., Bulaev, D. V., Loss, D. and Burkard, G. 2007. Spin qubits in graphene quantum dots. Nat. Phys., 3(3), 192–196.Google Scholar

[51] Wakabayashi, K., Takane, Y., Yamamoto, M., and Sigrist, M. 2009. Electronic transport properties of graphene nanoribbons. New J. Phys., 11(9), 095016.Google Scholar

[52] Wallace, P. R. 1947. The band theory of graphite. Phys. Rev., 71(9), 622–634.Google Scholar

[53] Wimmer, M., Akhmerov, A. R. and Guinea, F. 2010. Robustness of edge states in graphene quantum dots. ArXiv e-prints, Mar.

[54] Young, A. F. and Kim, P. 2009. Quantum interference and Klein tunnelling in graphene heterojunctions. Nat. Phys., 5(3), 222–226.Google Scholar

[55] Zhang, Y., Tan, Y. -W., Stormer, H. L. and Kim, P. 2005. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry's phase in graphene. Nature, 438(7065), 201–204.

[56] Zhang, Y., Brar, V. W., Girit, C., Zettl, A., and Crommie, M. F. 2009. Origin of spatial charge inhomogeneity in graphene. Nat. Phys., 5(10), 722–726.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.