Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T20:16:35.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The National Association of Manufacturers Helps Out

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jennifer Delton
Jennifer Delton
Affiliation:
Skidmore College, New York
Get access

Summary

The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) has long been a paragon of American business conservatism. Since its founding in 1895, the NAM has fought against unions, taxes, labor legislation, and the encroachment of the federal government into private enterprise. It opposed the New Deal and did everything in its power to subvert the prounion Wagner Act (1935). Its battle against the Wagner Act helped secure the passage of the Taft-Hartley Act (1947), which limited unions' power and signified a rightward shift in postwar domestic policy. In the 1950s, it continued its war against “creeping socialism,” standing athwart history, becoming in the eyes of the liberal establishment a bitter, extremist organization with little relevance in mainstream life.

Yet the NAM endorsed fair employment with regard to racial minorities and women beginning in 1941, restated its commitment to equal opportunity in the 1950s, and helped implement the equal opportunity legislation of the 1960s. The NAM facilitated and encouraged compliance with civil rights legislation and worked closely with government agencies such as the President's Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity (PCEEO), the Office of Contract Compliance (OFCC), and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to publicize the new regulations among small and medium-sized businesses. The NAM generally opposed federal legislation, but it did not officially oppose Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act nor did it try to stop its passage. It did however prefer voluntary approaches to legislation and encouraged its members to take affirmative actions to integrate their companies.

Type
Chapter
Information
Racial Integration in Corporate America, 1940–1990 , pp. 194 - 224
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Weinstein, James, The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State, 1900–1918 (Boston, 1968)Google Scholar
McQuaid, Kim, Uneasy Partners: Big Business in American Politics, 1945–1990 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Workman, Andrew, “Manufacturing Power: The Organizational Revival of the National Association of Manufacturers, 1941–45,” Business History Review 72, no. 2 (Summer 1998): 279–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Julie, Pure and Simple Politics: The American Federation of Labor and Political Activism, 1881–1917 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, Philip H., Jr., “The NAM as an Interest Group,” Politics and Society 4, no.1 (1973): 97–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gable, Richard, “NAM: Influential Lobby or Kiss of Death?” Journal of Politics (May 1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, Alfred, “NAM: Spokesman for Industry?” Harvard Business Review 26, no. 3 (May 1948): 353–71Google Scholar
Fones-Wolf, Elizabeth, Selling Free Enterprise: The Business Assault on Labor and Liberalism, 1945–1960 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Jacoby, Sanford, Modern Manors: Welfare Capitalism since the New Deal (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Whyte, William H., The Organization Man (Garden City, NY: Doubleday-Anchor, 1957)Google Scholar
Soffer, Jonathan, “The National Association of Manufacturers and the Militarization of American Conservatism,” Business History Review 75 (Winter 2001): 775–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leavitt, Theodore, “The Johnson Treatment,” Harvard Business Review (January–February 1967): 114–28Google Scholar
,David Grant testimony: “I feel that the man who deprives me of my right to work makes prostitutes of my daughters and convicts and criminals of my sons.” In ,U.S. Congress, House Committee on Labor, To Prohibit Discrimination in Employment (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1944), 53Google Scholar
Zieger, Robert, For Jobs and Freedom: Race and Labor in America since 1865 (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2007), 172–73Google Scholar
Leff, George, Free Choice for Workers: A History of the Right to Work Movement (Ottawa, IL: Jameson Books, 2005)Google Scholar
Moreno, Paul, Black Americans and Organized Labor: A New History (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press), 167
Kelley, Robin D. G. and Lewis, Earl, To Make Our World Anew: A History of African Americans (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 415Google Scholar
Hill, Herbert, Black Labor and the American Legal System: Race, Work and Law (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985)Google Scholar
Arnesen, Eric, “The Quicksands of Economic Insecurity': African Americans, Strikebreaking, and Labor Activism in the Industrial Era,” in The Black Worker: Race, Labor, and Civil Rights since Emancipation ed. Arnesen, Eric (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2007), 41–71Google Scholar
Bates, Beth Tompkins, “A New Crowd Challenges the Agenda of the Old Guard in the NAACP, 1933–1941,” American Historical Review 102, no. 2 (April 1997): 340–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurber, Timothy, The Politics of Equality: Hubert H. Humphrey and the African American Freedom Struggle (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999), 69–70, 102–5Google Scholar
Graham, Hugh Davis, The Civil Rights Era: Origins and Development of National Policy, 1960–1972 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
“Where Civil Rights Law Is Going Wrong,” Nation's Business 53, no. 11 (November 1965): 60–67
Stein, Judith, Running Steel, Running America: Race, Economic Policy and the Decline of Liberalism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1998), 103–18Google Scholar
Kotlowski, Dean, Nixon's Civil Rights: Politics, Principle, and Policy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Hoff, Joan, Nixon Reconsidered (New York: Basic Books, 1994)Google Scholar
Moreno, Paul, From Direct Action to Affirmative Action: Fair Employment Law and Policy in America, 1933–72 (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Skrentny, John David, The Ironies of Affirmative Action: Politics, Culture and Justice in America (Chicago: University of Chicago, 1996), 215Google Scholar
Fisher, Anne B., “Businessmen Like to Hire by the Numbers,” Fortune 112 (September 16, 1985): 26, 28–30Google Scholar
“A New Drive to Reaganize Equal Opportunity,” BusinessWeek, March 11, 1985, 42
Schwartz, Herman, “The 1986 and 1987 Affirmative Action Cases: It's All over but the Shouting,” Michigan Law Review 86, no. 3 (December 1987): 524–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×