Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T12:35:12.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Complications of Orthopedic Apparatus

from Section II - Orthopedic Apparatus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2017

By
Jason R. Wild
Edited by
Tim B. Hunter ,
Mihra S. Taljanovic  and
Jason R. Wild
Tim B. Hunter
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, College of Medicine
Mihra S. Taljanovic
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, College of Medicine
Jason R. Wild
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, College of Medicine
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Radiologic Guide to Orthopedic Devices , pp. 123 - 157
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AAOS. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Locking plates for extremity fractures. A technology overview. PDF (2008). Available at: www.aaos.org/research/overviews/LockingPlates.pdf.Google Scholar
Adams, S B, Demetracopoulos, C A, Queen, R M, et al. Early to mid-term results of fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty with a modular intramedullary tibial component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96(23): 1983–1989.Google Scholar
Althausen, P L, Hak, D J. Lower extremity traction pins: indications, technique, and complications. Am J Orthop 2002; 31: 43–47.Google Scholar
Anthony, P P, Gie, G A, Howie, C R, Ling, R S. Localized endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990; 72: 971–979.Google Scholar
Ardaugh, B M, Graves, S E, Redberg, R F. The 501(k) ancestry of a metal-on-metal hip implant. N Engl J Med 2013; 363(2): 97–100.Google Scholar
Argenson, J N, Boisgard, S, Paratte, S, et al. Survival analysis of total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up: a multicenter French nationwide study including 846 cases. Orthop Tramatol Res 2013; 99(4): 385–390.Google Scholar
Asencio, J G, Leonardi, C, Biron-Andreani, C, Schved, J F. Short-term and mid-term outcome of total ankle replacement in haemophilic patients. Foot Ankle Surg 2014; 20(4): 285–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Awan, O, Chen, L, Resnick, C S. Imaging evaluation of complications of hip arthroplasty: review of current concepts and imaging findings. Can Assoc Radiol J 2013; 64(4): 306–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bales, J G, Wall, L B, Stern, P J. Long-term results of Swanson silicone arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39(3): 455–461.Google Scholar
Beaman, F D, Bancroft, L W, Peterson, J J, et al. Imaging characteristics of bone graft materials. RadioGrapics 2006; 26(2): 373–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benjamin, B B, Lund, P J. Orthopedic devices. In: Hunter, T B, Bragg, D G, eds. Radiologic Guide to Medical Devices and Foreign Bodies. St Louis, MO: Mosby–Year Book, 1994; 348–385.Google Scholar
Berger, R A, Beckenbaugh, R D, Linscheid, R L. Arthroplasty in the hand and wrist. In: Green, D P, Hotchkins, R N, Pederson, W C. Green’s Operative Hand Surgery. 4th ed., Vol 1. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1999; 147–191.Google Scholar
Berquist, T H. Imaging Atlas of Orthopedic Appliances and Prostheses. New York, NY: Raven, 1995.Google Scholar
Bestic, J M, Berquist, T H. Current concepts in hip arthroplasty imaging: metal-on-metal prostheses, their complications, and imaging strategies. Semin Roentgenol 2013; 48(2): 178–186.Google Scholar
Bhatt, R A, Rozental, T D. Bone graft substitutes. Hand Clin 2012; 28(4): 457–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohsali, K, Wirth, M A, Rockwood, C A Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88(10): 2279–2292.Google Scholar
Boileau, P, Avidor, C, Krishnan, S G, et al. Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002; 11: 351–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boileau, P, Sinnerton, R J, Chuinard, C, Walch, G. Athroplasty of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(5): 562–575.Google Scholar
Bradberry, S M, Wilkinson, J M, Ferner, R E. Systemic toxicity related to metal hip prostheses. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2014; 52(8): 837–847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brady, O H, Masri, B A, Garbuz, D S, Duncan, C P. Use of reconstruction rings for the management of acetabular bone loss during revision hip surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1999; 7: 1–7.Google Scholar
Carlson, J R, Simons, B P. Total wrist arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1998; 6: 308–315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catena, F, Doty, J F, Jastifer, J, Coughlin, M J, Stevens, F. Prospective study of hammertoe correction with an intramedullary implant. Foot Ankle Int 2014; 35(4): 319–325.Google Scholar
Choi, H R, Bedair, H. Mortality following revision total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort study of septic versus aseptic revisions. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(6): 1216–1218.Google Scholar
Craig, N J, Sivaji, C, Maffulli, N. Subtrochanteric fractures: a review of treatment options. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 2001; 60: 35–46.Google Scholar
Deleu, P A, Devos Bevernage, B, Maldaque, P, Gombault, V, Leemrijse, T. Arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 2014; 35(6): 549–557.Google Scholar
Deshmukh, R V, Scott, R D. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results. Clin Orthop 2001; 392: 272–278.Google Scholar
Dhar, D. Fat embolism syndrome. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2012; 22(12): 800–802.Google Scholar
Divelbiss, B J, Sollerman, C, Adams, B D. Early results of the Universal total wrist arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27: 195–204.Google Scholar
Dy, C J, Bozic, K J, Pan, T J, et al. Risk factors for early revision after total hip arthroplasty. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014; 66(6): 907–915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easley, M E, Vertullo, C J, Urban, W C, Nunley, J A. Total ankle arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2002; 10: 157–167.Google Scholar
Erdil, M, Bilsel, K, Imren, Y, et al. Metatarsal head resurfacing hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of advanced stage hallux rigidus: outcomes in the short-term. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2012; 46(4): 281–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fehring, T K, Rosenberg, A G. Primary total hip arthroplasty: indications and contraindications. In: Callaghan, J J, Rosenberg, A G, Rubash, H E, eds. The adult hip. Vol 2. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1998; 893–898.Google Scholar
Freiberg, A A. The Radiology of Orthopedic Implants: An Atlas of Techniques and Assessment. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2001.Google Scholar
Galante, J O. Overview of total hip arthroplasty. In: Callaghan, J J, Rosenberg, A G, Rubash, H E, eds. The Adult Hip. Vol 2. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1998; 829–837.Google Scholar
Gelman, M I. Radiology of Orthopedic Procedures. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders, 1984.Google Scholar
Gougoulias, N E, Khanna, A, Maffulli, N. History and evolution in total ankle arthroplasty. Br Med Bull 2009; 89: 111–151.Google Scholar
Greisberg, J. The failed first metatarsophalangeal joint implant arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 2014; 19(3): 343–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, R, Phan, D, Schwarzkopf, R. Total knee arthroplasty failure induced by metal hypersensitivity. Am J Case Rep 2015; 16: 542–547.Google Scholar
Ha, A S, Petscavage, J M, Chew, F S. Current concepts of shoulder arthroplasty for radiologists: part 2 – anatomic and reverse total shoulder replacement and nonprosthetic resurfacing. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012a; 199: 768–776.Google Scholar
Ha, A S, Petscavage, J M, Chew, F S. Radial head arthroplasty: a radiologic outcome study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012b; 199: 1078–1082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hak, D J, Mauffrey, C, Seligson, D, Lindeque, B. Use of carbon-fiber-reinforced composite implants in orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics 2014; 37(12): 825–830.Google Scholar
Hannouche, D, Devriese, F, Delambre, J, et al. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA implants in patients younger than 20 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474(2): 520–527.Google Scholar
Hsu, A R, Haddad, S L. Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of intramedullary-fixation total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97(3): 194–200.Google Scholar
Hunt, L P, Ben-Shlomo, Y, Clark, E M, et al. 45-day mortality after 467,779 knee replacements for osteoarthritis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales: an observational study. Lancet 2014; 384(9952): 1429–1436.Google Scholar
Hunter, T B, Bragg, D G, eds. Radiologic Guide to Medical Devices and Foreign Bodies. St Louis, MO: Mosby–Year Book, 1994.Google Scholar
Inglis, A E, Pellicci, P M. Total elbow replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 1980; 62: 1252–1258.Google Scholar
Insall, J N. Historical development, classification, and characteristics of knee prostheses, In: Insall, J N, ed. Surgery of the Knee. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone, 1993; 677–717.Google Scholar
Jauregui, J J, Bor, N, Thakral, R, et al. Life- and limb-threatening infections following the use of an external fixator. Bone Joint J 2015; 97B(9): 1296–1300.Google Scholar
Jazrawi, L M, Kummer, F J, DiCesare, P E. Alternative bearing surfaces for total joint arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1988; 6: 198–203.Google Scholar
Jebson, P J, Adams, B D. Wrist arthrodesis: review of current techniques. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001; 9: 953–960.Google Scholar
Katz, J N. Parachutes and preferences-a trial of knee replacement. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(17): 1668–1669.Google Scholar
Koh, I J, Cho, W S, Choi, N Y, Kim, T K, Kleos Korea Research Group. Causes, risk factors, and trends in failures after TKA in Korea over the past 5 years: a multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472(1): 316–326.Google Scholar
Kramer, W C, Parman, M, Marks, R M. Hammertoe correction with K-wire fixation. Foot Ankle Int 2015; 36(5): 494–502.Google Scholar
Kurien, T, Pearson, R G, Scammell, B E. Bone graft substitutes currently available in orthopaedic practice: the evidence for their use. Bone Joint J 2013; 95B(5): 583–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, M D, Jensen, K L, Southworth, C, Matsen, F A 3rd. The radiographic evaluation of keeled and pegged glenoid component insertion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 1174–1182.Google Scholar
Lee, K J, Min, B W, Oh, G M, Lee, S W. Surgical correction of pelvic malunion and nonunion. Clin Orthop Surg 2015; 7(3): 396–401.Google Scholar
Lin, D J, Wong, T T, Kazam, J K. Shoulder arthroplasty, from indications to complications: what the radiologist needs to know. RadioGraphics 2016; 36: 192–208.Google Scholar
Lindgren, V, Gordon, M, Wretenberg, P, Karrholm, J, Garellick, G. Deep infection after total hip replacement: a method of national incidence surveillance. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014; 35(12): 1491–1496.Google Scholar
Little, J B. First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis in the treatment of hallux valgus. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2014; 31(2): 281–289.Google Scholar
Lunebourg, A, Parratee, S, Gay, A, et al. Lower function, quality of life, and survival rate after total knee arthroplasty for posttraumatic arthritis than for primary arthritis. Acta Orthopaedica 2014; Oct 28: 1–6.Google Scholar
Manaster, B J. Total hip arthroplasty: radiographic evaluation. RadioGraphics 1996; 16: 645–660.Google Scholar
Manrique, J, Gomez, M M, Parvizi, J. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2015; 28(2): 119–126.Google Scholar
McCalden, R W, Robert, C E, Howard, J L, et al. Comparison of outcomes and survivorship between patients of different age groups following TKA. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28(8 Suppl): 83–86.Google Scholar
Miric, A, Inacio, M C, Kelly, M P, Namba, R S. Can total knee arthroplasty be safely performed among nonagenarians? An evaluation of morbidity and mortality within a total joint replacement registry. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(8): 1635–1638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mulcahy, H, Chew, F S. Current concepts of hip arthroplasty for radiologists; Part 1, features and radiographic assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012a; 199: 559–569.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, H, Chew, F S. Current concepts of hip arthroplasty for radiologists; Part 2, revisions and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012b; 570–580.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, H, Chew, F S. Current concepts in knee replacement: features and imaging assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201(6): W828–842. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11307.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, H, Chew, F S. Current concepts in knee replacement: complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014; 202: W76–W86.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, H, Chew, F S. Current concepts in total ankle replacement for radiologists: features and imaging assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015a; 205: 1038–1047.Google Scholar
Mulcahy, H, Chew, FS. Current concepts in total ankle replacement for radiologists: complication. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015b; 205: 1244–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, M E. Technique of internal fixation fixation of fractures. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1965.Google Scholar
Nair, R. Review article: total wrist arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2014; 22(3): 399–405.Google Scholar
Pedersen, A B, Mehnert, F, Sorensen, H T, et al. The risk of venous thrombolembolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding and death in patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement: a 15-year retrospective cohort study of routine clinical practice. Bone Joint J 2014; 96B(4): 479–485.Google Scholar
Petscavage, J M, Ha, A S, Chew, F S. Current concepts of shoulder arthroplasty for radiologists: part 1 – epidemiology, history, preoperative imaging, and hemiarthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: 757–767.Google Scholar
Reito, A, Moilanent, T, Puolakka, T, Pajamaki, J, Eskelinen, A. Repeated metal ion measurements in patients with high risk metal-on-metal hip replacement. Int Orthop 2014; 38(7): 1353–1361.Google Scholar
Roberts, C C, Ekelund, A L, Renfree, K J, Liu, P T, Chew, F S. Radiologic assessment of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. RadioGraphics 2007; 27: 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronconi, P, Martinelli, N, Cancilleri, F, et al. Hemiarthroplasty and distal oblique first metatarsal osteotomy for hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int 2011; 32(2): 148–152.Google Scholar
Ruedi, T P, Buckley, R E, Moran, C G, eds. AO Principles of Fracture Management. Stuttgart: Thieme, 2007.Google Scholar
Schairer, W W, Vail, T P, Bozic, K J. What are the rates and causes of hospital readmission after total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472(1): 181–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheker, L R, Babb, B A, Killion, P E. Distal ulnar prosthetic replacement. Orthopedic Clin North Am 2001; 32: 1–10.Google Scholar
Schrumpf, M, Maak, T, Hammoud, S, Craig, E V. The glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2011; 4(4): 191–199.Google Scholar
Skou, S T, Roos, E M, Laursen, M B, et al. A randomized controlled trial of knee replacement. N Engl J Med 2015; 373(17): 1597–1606.Google Scholar
Stover, M. Distal femoral fractures: current treatment, results and problems. Injury 2001; 32: SC3–SC13.Google Scholar
Sung, W, Weil, L, Weil, LS Sr. Retrospective comparative study of operative repair of hammertoe deformity. Foot Ankle Spec 2014; 7(3): 185–192.Google Scholar
Taljanovic, M S, Jones, M D, Hunter, T B, et al. Joint arthroplasties and prostheses. RadioGraphics 2003; 23: 1295–1314.Google Scholar
Tiberi, J V 3rd, Hansen, V, El-Abbadi, N, Bedair, H. Increased complication rates after hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472(9): 2774–2778.Google Scholar
Titchner, A G, Duncan, N S, Rajan, R A. Outcome following first metatarsophalangeal joint replacement using TOEFIT-PLUS: a mid term alert. Foot Ankle Surg 2015; 21(2): 119–124.Google Scholar
Tosti, R, Foroohar, A, Pizzutillo, P D, Herman, M J. Kirschner wire infections in pediatric orthopaedic surgery. J Pediatr Orhop 2015; 35(1): 69–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsai, I T, Hsu, C J, Chen, Y H, et al. Fat embolism syndrome in long bone fracture-clinical experience in a tertiary referral center in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc 2010; 73(8): 407–410.Google Scholar
van Harlingen, D, Heesterbeek, P J C, de Vos, M J. High rate of complications and radiographic loosening of biaxial total wrist arthroplasty in rheumatoid patients. Acta Orthop 2011; 82(6): 721–726.Google Scholar
Visuri, T, Borq, H, Pulkkinen, P, Paavolainen, P, Pukkala, E. A retrospective comparative study of mortality and causes of death among patients with metal-on-metal and metal-on-polyethylene total hip prostheses in primary osteoarthritis after a long-term follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-78.Google Scholar
Wagoner, M R, Creech, C L, Nolan, C K, Meyr, A J. Pictoral review and basic principles of foot and ankle hardware extraction. Foot Ankle Spec 2015; 8(4): 305–313.Google Scholar
Waljee, J F, Chung, K C. Objective functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after silicone metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37(1): 47–54.Google Scholar
Wulker, N, Mittag, F. The treatment of hallux valgus. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2012; 109(49): 857–868.Google Scholar
Yu, J J, Sheskier, S. Total ankle replacement-evolution of the technology and future applications. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2014; 72(1): 120–128.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×